Congressional Record—House H7090

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record—House H7090 H7090 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE October 26, 2011 Senate amendment to H.R. 2608 (H. Res. scribes the vote on the previous question on ceedings on this question will be post- 405)—CR I11Senate amendment to H.R. 2608 the rule as ‘‘a motion to direct or control the poned. (H. Res. 412)—CR consideration of the subject before the House being made by the Member in charge.’’ To f H.R. 658 (H. Res. 189)—FAA reauthoriza- defeat the previous question is to give the SOUTHEAST ARIZONA LAND EX- tion opposition a chance to decide the subject be- CHANGE AND CONSERVATION H.R. 754 (H. Res. 264)—Intel Authorization fore the House. Cannon cites the Speaker’s ACT OF 2011 H.R. 1892 (H. Res. 392)—Intel Authorization ruling of January 13, 1920, to the effect that Vote no on the previous question, reject this ‘‘the refusal of the House to sustain the de- Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. Mr. rule, and reject the pay-for that violates the mand for the previous question passes the Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that control of the resolution to the opposition’’ Budget Act and cuts healthcare for low-income all Members may have 5 legislative in order to offer an amendment. On March days in which to revise and extend families. 15, 1909, a member of the majority party of- The material previously referred to fered a rule resolution. The House defeated their remarks and include extraneous by Mr. HASTINGS of Florida is as fol- the previous question and a member of the material on H.R. 1904. lows: opposition rose to a parliamentary inquiry, The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina). Is there ob- AN AMENDMENT TO H. RES. 448 OFFERED BY asking who was entitled to recognition. MR. HASTINGS OF FLORIDA Speaker Joseph G. Cannon (R–Illinois) said: jection to the request of the gentleman ‘‘The previous question having been refused, (1) In the first section of the resolution, from Washington? the gentleman from New York, Mr. Fitz- There was no objection. strike ‘‘the previous question’’ and all that gerald, who had asked the gentleman to follows and insert the following: The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- yield to him for an amendment, is entitled to ant to House Resolution 444 and rule The previous question shall be considered the first recognition.’’ as ordered on the bill and on any amendment Because the vote today may look bad for XVIII, the Chair declares the House in thereto to final passage without intervening the Republican majority they will say ‘‘the the Committee of the Whole House on motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally vote on the previous question is simply a the state of the Union for the consider- divided and controlled by the chair and rank- vote on whether to proceed to an immediate ation of the bill, H.R. 1904. ing minority member of the Committee on vote on adopting the resolution . [and] Ways and Means; (2) the amendment printed has no substantive legislative or policy im- b 1321 in section 4, if offered by Representative plications whatsoever.’’ But that is not what IN THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE Levin of Michigan, or Representative Bishop they have always said. Listen to the Repub- Accordingly, the House resolved of New York, or Representative Keating of lican Leadership Manual on the Legislative itself into the Committee of the Whole Massachusetts, which shall be in order with- Process in the United States House of Rep- House on the state of the Union for the out intervention of any point of order, shall resentatives, (6th edition, page 135). Here’s be considered as read, and shall be separately how the Republicans describe the previous consideration of the bill (H.R. 1904) to debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and question vote in their own manual: ‘‘Al- facilitate the efficient extraction of controlled by the proponent and an oppo- though it is generally not possible to amend mineral resources in southeast Arizona nent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or the rule because the majority Member con- by authorizing and directing an ex- without instructions. trolling the time will not yield for the pur- change of Federal and non-Federal (2) At the end of the resolution, add the pose of offering an amendment, the same re- land, and for other purposes, with Mr. following: sult may be achieved by voting down the pre- MURPHY of Pennsylvania in the chair. SEC. 4. The amendment referred to in the vious question on the rule. When the The Clerk read the title of the bill. first section of this resolution is as follows: motion for the previous question is defeated, Strike all after the enacting clause and in- control of the time passes to the Member The CHAIR. Pursuant to the rule, the sert the following: who led the opposition to ordering the pre- bill is considered read the first time. The gentleman from Washington (Mr. SECTION 1. REPEAL OF IMPOSITION OF 3 PER- vious question. That Member, because he CENT WITHHOLDING ON CERTAIN then controls the time, may offer an amend- HASTINGS) and the gentleman from Ari- PAYMENTS MADE TO VENDORS BY ment to the rule, or yield for the purpose of zona (Mr. GRIJALVA) each will control GOVERNMENT ENTITIES. amendment.’’ 30 minutes. (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3402 of the Inter- In Deschler’s Procedure in the U.S. House The Chair recognizes the gentleman nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by of Representatives, the subchapter titled from Washington. striking subsection (t). ‘‘Amending Special Rules’’ states: ‘‘a refusal Mr. HASTINGS of Washington. I (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment to order the previous question on such a rule made by this section shall apply to payments [a special rule reported from the Committee yield myself such time as I may con- made after December 31, 2011. on Rules] opens the resolution to amend- sume. Mr. Chairman, our Nation has suf- SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE ment and further debate.’’ (Chapter 21, sec- TO DOMESTIC PRODUCTION ACTIVI- tion 21.2) Section 21.3 continues: ‘‘Upon re- fered through 32 consecutive months of TIES NOT ALLOWED WITH RESPECT jection of the motion for the previous ques- over 8 percent unemployment, and peo- TO OIL AND GAS ACTIVITIES OF tion on a resolution reported from the Com- ple everywhere across our great Nation MAJOR INTEGRATED OIL COMPA- mittee on Rules, control shifts to the Mem- continue to ask, where are the jobs? NIES. ber leading the opposition to the previous (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of sec- question, who may offer a proper amendment Congress’ top priority right now is job tion 199(d)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code of or motion and who controls the time for de- creation, and today we have an oppor- 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(9 percent in bate thereon.’’ tunity to act on that commitment by the case of any major integrated oil com- Clearly, the vote on the previous question passing a bill that would put thousands pany (as defined in section 167(h)(5)))’’ after on a rule does have substantive policy impli- of Americans to work. ‘‘3 percent’’. cations. It is one of the only available tools The Southeast Arizona Land Ex- (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment for those who oppose the Republican major- change and Conservation Act, spon- made by subsection (a) shall apply to taxable ity’s agenda and allows those with alter- sored by our colleague from Arizona years beginning after the date of the enact- native views the opportunity to offer an al- ment of this Act. ternative plan. (Mr. GOSAR), is a commonsense meas- (The information contained herein was Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina. Mr. ure that will create new American jobs provided by the Republican Minority on mul- Speaker, I yield back the balance of and strengthen our economy through tiple occasions throughout the 110th and my time, and I move the previous ques- increased U.S. mineral production. 111th Congresses.) The bill authorizes an equal-value tion on the resolution. THE VOTE ON THE PREVIOUS QUESTION: WHAT The SPEAKER pro tempore. The land exchange between Resolution Cop- IT REALLY MEANS question is on ordering the previous per, the Federal Government, the State This vote, the vote on whether to order the question. of Arizona and the town of Superior, previous question on a special rule, is not The question was taken; and the Arizona, that will open up the third- merely a procedural vote. A vote against or- Speaker pro tempore announced that largest undeveloped copper resource in dering the previous question is a vote the ayes appeared to have it. the world. The bill requires the cost of against the Republican majority agenda and the land exchange to be fully paid for a vote to allow the opposition, at least for Mr. HASTINGS of Florida. Mr. the moment, to offer an alternative plan. It Speaker, on that I demand the yeas by the mine developer, ensuring fair is a vote about what the House should be de- and nays. treatment for taxpayers and for the bating. The yeas and nays were ordered. government. Mr. Clarence Cannon’s Precedents of the The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- This project will provide substantial House of Representatives (VI, 308–311), de- ant to clause 8 of rule XX, further pro- benefits to the United States in the VerDate Mar 15 2010 02:01 Oct 27, 2011 Jkt 019060 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 0636 Sfmt 0634 E:\CR\FM\A26OC7.027 H26OCPT1 tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with HOUSE October 26, 2011 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H7091 form of job creation, economic growth, al consultation prior to constructing Mountain Apache, Yavapai-Apache, and increased national security.
Recommended publications
  • April 7, 2005 the Honorable Jim Kolbe United States House of Representatives 237 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC
    American Lands Alliance ♦ Access Fund ♦ Arizona Mountaineering Club ♦ Arizona Native Plant Society ♦ Arizona Wildlife Federation ♦ Center for Biological Diversity ♦ Chiricahua-Dragoon Conservation Alliance ♦ Citizens for the Preservation of Powers Gulch and Pinto Creek ♦ Citizens for Victor! ♦ EARTHWORKS ♦ Endangered Species Coalition ♦Friends of Queen Creek ♦ Gila Resources Information Project ♦ Grand Canyon Chapter of the Sierra Club ♦ Great Basin Mine Watch♦ The Lands Council ♦ Maricopa Audubon Society ♦ Mining Impact Coalition of Wisconsin ♦ Mount Graham Coalition ♦ National Wildlife Federation ♦ Rock Creek Alliance ♦Water More Precious Than Gold ♦ Western Land Exchange Project ♦ Yuma Audubon Society April 7, 2005 The Honorable Jim Kolbe United States House of Representatives 237 Cannon House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Dear Representative Kolbe, On behalf of the undersigned organizations and the thousands of members we represent in Arizona and nationwide, we urge you not to introduce the Southeastern Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2005 (the “land exchange bill”) that would, in part, revoke a mining prohibition on 760 acres of public lands in the Tonto National Forest in the area of the Oak Flat Campground 60 miles east of Phoenix. Resolution Copper Company (RCC), a foreign-owned mining company, is planning a massive block-cave mine and seeks to acquire Oak Flat Campground and the surrounding public lands for its use through this land exchange bill. If they succeed, the campground and an additional 2,300 acres of the Tonto National Forest will become private property and forever off limits to recreationists and other users. Privatization of this land would end public access to some of the most spectacular outdoor recreation and wildlife viewing areas in Arizona and cause massive surface subsidence leaving a permanent scar on the landscape and eliminating the possibility of a diversified economy for the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Get the Facts on Oak Flat
    Get the Facts on Oak Flat Background Oak Flat is a part of the Tonto National Forest in Arizona. In 2014 Congress passed the National Defense Authorization Act with a rider that would give 2,422 acres on Tonto National Forest to a mining Conglomerate of two of the world’s largest mining companies.1 These companies, BHP and the Rio Tinto Group, plan to create a massive mine in Oak Flat in order to remove the copper that lies 7,000 feet underground. They call this project “Resolution Copper.” 2 Effects ● Subsidence­ the mine will create a large sinkhole that is estimated to be 2­4 miles in diameter. When supporting rock underneath the surface is removed, it causes a gradual sinking on the surface, resulting in a crater­like depression in the earth.3 ● Waste products­ the mine is expected to produce 1.5 billion tons of tailings. Tailings are the materials left over after the process of separating the copper from the unusable part of the ore. 4 Even if tailings are properly stored, they can easily contaminate water and soil through acid drainage or other means. 5 ● Water­ Arizona already suffers from drought in many areas, and this mine will use an estimated 20,000 acre feet of water per year­ enough to provide water for 20,000 families or 80,000 people for an entire year. To function the mine requires the removal of water to keep the mine shafts dry.6 Water is a precious resource that must be protected. Why this land is important ● Sacred land­ Oak Flat is sacred to the San Carlos Apache people.
    [Show full text]
  • Vote on Hr 687 Delayed! Keep up the Pressure Bill Would
    Urgent Action Alert | VOTE ON H.R. 687 DELAYED! KEEP UP THE PRESSURE BILL WOULD TRANSFER APACHE AND YAVAPAI SACRED AREAS ON FOREST LANDS TO MINING COMPANY VOTE RESCHEDULED FOR FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 at 9:30 AM Today the U.S. House of Representatives debated, H.R. 687, the SE Arizona Land Exchange, which would direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey over 2,400 acres of U.S. Forest Service land in an area known as Oak Flat to a foreign owned mining company (Resolution Copper). The lands have significant religious, cultural, historical, and archeological value to Apache, Yavapai and other tribes in the region. If H.R. 687 is enacted, the mining company will operate an unprecedented large-scale copper mine, which will destroy this place of worship. Because of Indian Country’s collective efforts to voice strong opposition to the bill, the House of Representatives conducted a robust debate today on the bill and three amendments sponsored by Reps. Raul Grijalva (D-AZ), Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM) and Grace Napolitano (D-CA) were offered, which included a passionate discussion of Congress’ obligation to protect Native sacred areas located on federal lands. The House voted on the amendments offered by Reps. Grijalva and Napolitano but then decided to delay the votes on the Lujan amendment and final passage of the bill. House leadership postponed the votes on the Lujan amendment to protect sacred and cultural areas and on the underlying bill due to the concern that the bill currently does not have enough votes for passage due to tribal opposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2013
    113TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 113–167 SOUTHEAST ARIZONA LAND EXCHANGE AND CONSERVATION ACT OF 2013 JULY 22, 2013.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Natural Resources, submitted the following R E P O R T together with DISSENTING VIEWS [To accompany H.R. 687] [Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 687) to facilitate the efficient extraction of mineral re- sources in southeast Arizona by authorizing and directing an ex- change of Federal and non-Federal land, and for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do pass. The amendment is as follows: Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southeast Arizona Land Ex- change and Conservation Act of 2013’’. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Findings and purpose. Sec. 3. Definitions. Sec. 4. Land exchange. Sec. 5. Conveyance and management of non-Federal land. Sec. 6. Value adjustment payment to United States. Sec. 7. Withdrawal. Sec. 8. Apache leap. Sec. 9. Miscellaneous provisions. SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds that— 29–006 VerDate Mar 15 2010 04:28 Jul 24, 2013 Jkt 029006 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6621 E:\HR\OC\HR167.XXX HR167 tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with REPORTS 2 (1) the land exchange furthers public objectives referenced in section 206 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Bikers, Bands and Barristers: Oak Flat Copper Mine Plan Draws a Wide Range of Opponents
    https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2021/03/07/oak-flat-copper-mine-inspires- support-from-lawyers-singers-catholic-brophy-prep-students/4549754001/ Bikers, bands and barristers: Oak Flat copper mine plan draws a wide range of opponents Debra Utacia Krol Arizona Republic Published 7:00 a.m. MT Mar 7, 2021 Mario Tsosie and more than two dozen other motorcycle riders rumbled into Oak Flat Campground last month with a mission and a message. "We had riders come from San Diego, Fresno, Orange County and Los Angeles," said Tsosie, a Navajo who rides with Redrum Motorcycle Club, the world's largest Indigenous-based biker group. "It was pretty exciting." Tsosie, a member of the Valley of the Sun Chapter of the club, said the Feb. 21 caravan to Oak Flat, about 70 miles east of Phoenix, was almost a last-minute affair. The club had just two weeks to plan the 41-mile ride from San Carlos, capital of the San Carlos Apache Tribe, to the campground. "We've been looking for the right time to do this," he said. Wendsler Nosie, head of the grassroots group Apache Stronghold, has been living at the campground since November 2019 to focus opposition on a plan by Resolution Copper to build a huge copper mine beneath the site, land considered sacred by many Apaches and other tribes in Arizona. He seemed surprised when a few dozen motorcycles arrived, said Tsosie. But once the club members explained that they were there to offer support and prayer, the meeting went well.
    [Show full text]
  • Apache Stronghold Complaint
    Case 2:21-cv-00050-CDB Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 1 of 32 Michael V. Nixon (OR Bar # 893240) (pro hac vice application pending) 101 SW Madison Street # 9325 Portland, OR 97207 Telephone: 503.522.4257 Email: [email protected] Clifford Levenson (AZ Bar # 014523) 5119 North 19th Avenue, Suite K Phoenix, AZ 85015 Telephone: 602.258.8989 Fax: 602.544.1900 Email: [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Phoenix Division Apache Stronghold, ) No. CV-21-______-PHX- a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, ) ) COMPLAINT Plaintiff, ) ) For violations of: v. ) ) Treaty Rights, Trust Responsibility and ) Fiduciary Duty; the Religious Freedom ) Restoration Act; First Amendment Rights to United States of America, ) Free Exercise of Religion, and to Petition ) and for Remedy; and Fifth Amendment Right Sonny Perdue, Secretary, U.S. Department ) to Due Process. of Agriculture (USDA), ) ) And to compel the performance of: Vicki Christensen, Chief, USDA Forest ) Service, ) Trust Obligations & To Provide A Full ) Accounting Neil Bosworth, Supervisor, USDA Forest ) Service, Tonto National Forest, ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED and ) ) Tom Torres, Acting Supervisor, USDA ) Forest Service, Tonto National ) Forest, ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT 1 Case 2:21-cv-00050-CDB Document 1 Filed 01/12/21 Page 2 of 32 The Great Spirit made all things... So live your life that the fear of death can never enter your heart. Trouble no one about their religion; respect others in their view, and demand that they respect yours. Love your life, perfect your life, beautify all things in your life.
    [Show full text]
  • 49302 FSPLT1 028837.Pdf
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ______________________________ RESOLUTION PRE-FEASIBILITY ACTIVITIES PLAN OF OPERATIONS May 2010 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper Digital copies are available for download from the Tonto National Forest website. If printing a copy, please consider the environment and use recycled paper. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................... v 1. PROJECT SCOPE .............................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Organization of the Environmental Assessment ....................................................................1-1 1.2. Project Background and History ............................................................................................1-2
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Tinto and BHP Battle Apache Tribes to Build North America's Biggest Copper Mine at Sacred Oak Flat Site
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-27/rio-tinto-indigenous-mining-juukan-gorge-oak-flat- apache/13087514 Rio Tinto and BHP battle Apache tribes to build North America's biggest copper mine at sacred Oak Flat site By business reporter Sue Lannin Posted 5hhours ago, updated 19mminutes ago [Jasnuary 26, 2021] Apache elder Wendsler Nosie is one of those leading the campaign to save Oak Flat from mining.(Supplied: Wendsler Nosie) "This place is very holy and religious to us." Wendsler Nosie Senior, an elder of the San Carlos Apache Tribe, is describing his people's land, Oak Flat or Chi'chil Bildagoteel, in the Arizona desert in the US south-west. The site in the Tonto National Forest is a popular camping and hiking ground and contains sacred cultural heritage locations that include rock carvings, burial sites and the Apache Leap, where Apache warriors jumped to their death after being driven to the edge of the cliff by the US cavalry. But earlier this month, in the dying days of the Trump administration, the US Government handed over Oak Flat to two of the world's biggest mining companies, Rio Tinto and BHP. Through a joint venture named Resolution Copper, the global miners want to build North America's largest copper mine, on the Apache land, about 100 kilometres from Arizona's capital Phoenix. The San Carlos Apache tribe has been campaigning for years to prevent mining at Oak Flat.(Supplied) Resolution Copper says the planned underground mine, which will be 2 kilometres metres below ground, will bring nearly 4,000 jobs and tens of billions of dollars in economic benefits to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Rambler-2012.Pdf
    S. HRG. 112–486 RESOLUTION COPPER HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION TO CONSIDER H.R. 1904, THE SOUTHEAST ARIZONA LAND EXCHANGE AND CONSERVATION ACT OF 2011; AND S. 409, THE SOUTHEAST ARIZONA LAND EXCHANGE AND CONSERVATION ACT OF 2009, AS REPORTED BY THE COMMITTEE DURING THE 111TH CONGRESS FEBRUARY 9, 2012 ( Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 75–271 PDF WASHINGTON : 2012 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES JEFF BINGAMAN, New Mexico, Chairman RON WYDEN, Oregon LISA MURKOWSKI, Alaska TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming MARY L. LANDRIEU, Louisiana JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho MARIA CANTWELL, Washington MIKE LEE, Utah BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont RAND PAUL, Kentucky DEBBIE STABENOW, Michigan DANIEL COATS, Indiana MARK UDALL, Colorado ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JOHN HOEVEN, North Dakota AL FRANKEN, Minnesota DEAN HELLER, Nevada JOE MANCHIN, III, West Virginia BOB CORKER, Tennessee CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware ROBERT M. SIMON, Staff Director SAM E. FOWLER, Chief Counsel MCKIE CAMPBELL, Republican Staff Director KAREN K. BILLUPS, Republican Chief Counsel (II) C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS Page Bingaman, Hon. Jeff, U.S. Senator From New Mexico ........................................ 1 Cherry, Jon, Vice President, Resolution Copper Company .................................. 25 Farquhar, Ned, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management, Department of the Interior .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Statement Submitted to the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States, U.S
    Statement Submitted to the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States, U.S. House of Representatives Natural Resources Committee, re: H.R. 1884, the Save Oak Flat Act Submitted by Randy Serraglio, Southwest Conservation Advocate, Center for Biological Diversity, April 13, 2021 Thank you for holding a hearing on H.R. 1884, the Save Oak Flat Act, and for the opportunity to provide input in support of this critically important and urgent bill. The spiritual, cultural and natural heritage of the Apache people and the ecological integrity of a priceless piece of public land hang in the balance. Oak Flat is a very popular campground in the Tonto National Forest in central Arizona, offering spectacular scenery, diverse wildlife and world-class rock-climbing opportunities. It’s also the location of the best set of Western Apache cultural artifacts in existence, according to tribal historic preservation experts, evidence of the centuries over which Oak Flat has been central to Western Apache culture by providing habitation, sustenance, and a sacred place for religious ceremony and spiritual fulfillment. Unfortunately, it also sits above a potentially lucrative ore body that Resolution Copper (a subsidiary of international mining behemoths Rio Tinto and BHP) wants to exploit for a massive copper mine that would destroy Oak Flat. In 1955, President Eisenhower recognized the public values of Oak Flat and formally withdrew it from mineral entry in order to preserve it in perpetuity. The mining companies are seeking to circumvent this mineral withdrawal by executing a land trade with the U.S. government and obtaining private control of Oak Flat.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolutions Committee Recommendation
    N A T I O N A L C O N G R E S S O F A M E R I C A N I N D I A N S Resolutions Committee Recommendation Resolution #: MSP-15-001 Title: “Support for Repeal of Section 3003 of the FY15 National Defense Authorization Act, the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange Comments: • Resolution calls for the repeal of Section 3003 of the Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Act (FY15 NDAA), which became law in December 2014. It is only calling for repeal of Section 3003, and not the entire FY15 NDAA. • Section 3003 is the “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange”, which authorizes the conveyance of federal lands to Resolution Copper for the purposes of mining copper. The lands authorized in the conveyance include an area known as Oak Flat, a sacred place to the Apache of Arizona, and the proposed mining operations will cause irreparable harm to and surrounding the Oak Flat area. • Despite the authorizing legislation’s failure to pass for over a decade, the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange Act was added as a rider to the FY15 NDAA in December 2014 and passed shortly thereafter. • While Section 3003 of the FY15 NDAA authorized the transfer of these lands, it also mandated the U.S. Department of Agriculture to conduct an environmental impact statement and engage in government-to-government consultation with affected Indian tribes prior to such conveyance. Recommendations: • Recommend title change to, “Support for Repeal of Section 3003, the Southeast Arizona Land Exchange, in the Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Act” • Proposed edits include
    [Show full text]
  • Written Testimony of Roger Featherstone
    Written Testimony of Roger Featherstone Southwest Circuit Rider EARTHWORKS Public Lands and Forests Subcommitee of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Hearing on S. 3157 “Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2008” Wednesday, July 9, 2008 EARTHWORKS is a non-profit, non-partisan environmental organization dedicated to protecting communities and the environment from the adverse impacts of mineral development. Our national office, based in Washington D.C., provides support to citizens across the country and around the world. Our field offices in Arizona and Montana assist communities throughout the western United States concerned about the impact of mineral development in their backyards. EARTHWORKS supports responsible mining policies and practices and recognizes that some mining companies seek to operate in a manner that protects our environment. The Sierra Club is America's oldest, largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization. Inspired by nature, the Sierra Club’s members—including 14,000 in Arizona—work together to protect our communities and the planet. The Sierra Club's mission is to explore, enjoy, and protect the wild places of the earth; to practice and promote the responsible use of the earth's ecosystems and resources; to educate and enlist humanity to protect and restore the quality of the natural and human environment; and to use all lawful means to carry out these objectives. The Sierra Club’s Grand Canyon Chapter has been actively involved in protecting public lands in Arizona for more than 40 years. We appreciate the opportunity to express our view in front of the Subcommittee about S.
    [Show full text]