Catholic Mount Auburn Cemetery East Watertown, MA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Catholic Mount Auburn Cemetery East Watertown, MA Catholic Mount Auburn Cemetery East Watertown, MA William A. McEvoy Jr, 1 © Bill McEvoy is a US Army Veteran (1968-1971). He earned a BA from Bentley University, MBA from Suffolk University, and MA in Political Science from Boston College. While at BC he had the privilege of participating in a semester long colloquium with Dr. Thomas H. O’Connor, the Dean of the History Department. He retired as a Massachusetts District Court Magistrate in 2009. He has volunteered for eight years with the No Veteran Dies Alone program at the Bedford Veterans Hospital, as well performing pro bono work as a Magistrate, one day per week, for ten years. Since his first month of retirement, he has performed many large-scale cemetery research projects, several as a volunteer at Mount Auburn Cemetery (MAC). This book is the result of his four year study of the 23,000+ people (primarily Irish immigrants or their first generation descendants) buried from 1854 to 1920 at the Catholic Mount Auburn Cemetery (CMAC), Watertown, MA. In the course of his research and writing, he expended over 6,000 hours. The CMAC project made him aware of the high mortality rate of Boston’s children. Of 15,562 burials, from 1854-1881, eighty percent died in Boston. Forty-nine percent of all burials, from all cities and towns, at CMAC were children who did not reach age 6. Forty-five percent of those burials, from all cities and towns, were children who did not reach age 4. Between 1856 and 1893, thirty-six of the people buried at the CMAC were noted as dying at Rainsford Island. Their ages ranged from nine months to eighty-six years. James Tubman, nine months old, died in 1863 at Rainsford Island from starvation. Prior to going to Rainsford, he had been Baptized at St. Joseph Church, Boston. Mary E. Sullivan, died in 1858 at Bennett Avenue [sic], Boston, from lung inflammation. She was born at Rainsford Island. That finding resulted in Bill’s researching Rainsford Island and writing the book, RAINSFORD ISLAND A BOSTON HARBOR CASE STUDY IN PUBLIC NEGLECT AND PRIVATE ACTIVISM, Coauthored by Robin Hazard Ray. Most of the people buried at CMAC and Rainsford Island resided in Boston’s tenements. Bill plans to combine both cemetery’s databases. That will allow him to measure the positive impact of Boston's men and women whose philanthropic efforts were dedicated to tenement reforms during the last half of the nineteenth century. In addition to the rehabilitation of properties, the reformers attempted to change the lives of their tenants by setting boundaries of behavior, providing encouragement and life skills, as well as closely overseeing the operation of the properties. In the course of his research he located two sets of his great-great-grandparents buried in unmarked graves. 2 © Catholic Mount Auburn Cemetery East Watertown, MA by William A. McEvoy Jr, First Printing January 31, 2020 Dedicated to Lucille H. McEvoy Copyright: January, 2020 ISBN: 978-1-6602-3453-0 3 © Table of Contents Preface 5 Chapter 1….Cemetery Acquisition 10 Chapter 2….Clergy 16 Chapter 3….Physicians 35 Chapter 4….Homicide Victims 43 Chapter 5….Compassion and Forgiveness-Suicides 92 Chapter 6….African Americans 107 Chapter 7….Accidental Deaths 110 Chapter 8….Vital Statistics of the Residents 129 Chapter 9….Veterans 139 Chapter 10…Monuments 146 Chapter 11…Secretary of State’s Complaint 163 Chapter 12…Neglect of Headstones & Perpetual Care? 194 Appendix 1...Cemetery Capacity without Over-Burials 220 Appendix 2…Cemetery Map 222 4 © Preface In 2011, Joyce Kelly, Marilynn Roach, and Lynne O’Connell, “of the Historical Society of Watertown”, and Kenneth Rand, “an interested Watertown resident,” met with me at the Catholic Mount Auburn Cemetery, Watertown, MA. Mr. Rand had a map of the Cemetery, which he had updated from a previously existing 1954 map. He also had a copy of a notebook, containing 310 pages, indicating burials at the Cemetery from 1885 to 1947. Mr. Rand indicated that he had made the copy in the early 1990s. At that time the Burial Notebook was maintained at the Calvary Cemetery in Waltham, MA. Mr. Rand also had 50 pages of copied lot cards that included many burials done after 1947. After our meeting, Mr. Rand allowed Ms. Kelly to take possession of the copies so that she could duplicate them and return Mr. Rand’s copy to him. Ms. Kelly allowed me to make two sets of the copies. Ms. Kelly kept one copy, and I the other. On February 8, 2012, I began my effort to post all of the names noted on headstones at the Catholic Mount Auburn Cemetery (CMAC) to Findagrave.com. That was the initial goal of the project. I divided the Cemetery into eight zones and proceeded to take digital pictures within each zone. I then posted the names on the headstones to Findagrave.com. As that task progressed, I discovered that my dividing the cemetery into eight zones was not helpful in identifying the grave and row numbers to be noted on Findagrave.com. I continued the effort with the knowledge that I would have to find a more efficient and accurate method. Several months later, when my initial goal was accomplished, I expanded the scope of the project. I designed a spreadsheet and recorded the burial notebook information on it, beginning in 1885 and ending in 1947. The notebook listed 6,383 burials for that period. The dates noted in the burial notebook were usually the date of burial. I then added about 167 post 1947 burials noted on the lot card copies but not on the headstones I had recorded. Each lot card began with the date of purchase which was pre 1870s. The dates on the lot cards noted the date of burial. Many indicated “Perpetual Care” or “PC.” At that time, the spreadsheet only noted, the date of death, the deceased’s name, age at death, grave lot number, and row. I sorted that list by row then by grave number. In order to correct my initial method of photographing lots, working East to West, beginning with Lot number 1, Row 1 East, and doing 2 rows at a time, I re-photographed all of the headstone pictures. As I progressed through the rows, burials without headstones were added to Findagrave.com. Additionally, many headstones that had fallen facedown were matched and noted on the spreadsheet. The fact that the headstones were facedown was also noted on 5 © Findagrave.com, as well as the photos of those fallen markers. Lot and Row numbers were then added to all Findagrave.com postings. That task was completed at the end of September 2012. It became obvious that my original estimate of 12,000 burials in less than 6,000 lots, located in less than seven acres, was greatly understated. That was a result of my assumption that each lot was a two person grave. However, as the standard grave at that time was 2.5 feet in width, the measurements of the length of each row of the cemetery indicated that each lot could hold four people; two people wide, with two above the first deeper burials. The spreadsheet often noted more than four burials in a four person lot, while other lots contained less than four burials. Over-burying sometimes also occurred in the eight person lots. The calculations for the cemetery’s capacity, without over-burying, can be found at the end of this document. (pp 220 & 221). Page 8, of this book, notes the years and months not added due to those records having been lost by the Cemetery. I estimate those lost records would add 1,500+ names to the cemetery inventory. Next, in an effort to locate the pre-1885 burial book(s), I expanded the project’s scope. The Archdiocese of Boston’s Archives, located in Braintree, MA, had the records of lots sold, beginning April 11, 1854, to Michael Lehan and James Boyce. The first burials were Michael Lehan Jr. and Jane Boyce on April 11, 1854. The Archives also has three burial books recording the first burials on April 11, 1854 to June 30, 1882. I digitally photographed the contents of burial and lot sales books. Approximately 16,000 burials were recorded during that period. Photographing the information maintained by the Archives allowed me to transfer that data to the spreadsheet while working at home. I was fortunate to find a partial spreadsheet that listed many of the purchases. The burial notebook for that period only reflects the date of burial. After comparing a sample of dates of burial to the death records, I found that most burials were performed the day after death. Therefore, dates of death posted to Findagrave.com normally reflect the subtraction of one day from the date of burial. The burial records for the period from July 1, 1882 to December 31, 1884, have yet to be located. The extent of my unsuccessful efforts to find them are noted on pages 8 & 9. While at the Archdiocese Archives, I also found a spreadsheet copy of all lots sold. That was done by Mr. James F. Martin of Chelmsford, MA. I was able to contact him and he generously emailed me his Excel spreadsheet noting the lots sold in chronological order. I highlighted the lots that had headstones. Highlighting was useful in determining who was buried in lots where the headstone had fallen facedown. I later verified his work to the source document. During October 2012 to November 2013, I continued adding the names noted in the Burial Book from 1854 to 1882, to my spreadsheet, as well as to Findagrave.com.
Recommended publications
  • Harvard Square Cambridge, Ma 5 Jfk St & 24 Brattle St
    HARVARD SQUARE CAMBRIDGE, MA 5 JFK ST & 24 BRATTLE ST. RETAIL FOR LEASE 600 – 11,000 SF SUBDIVIDABLE THE ABBOT is THE epicenter of Harvard Square. This iconic property is undergoing a complete redevelopment to create an irreplaceable world class retail and office destination. LEASING HIGHLIGHTS TRANSIT ORIENTED EXCEPTIONAL DEMOGRAPHICS Steps away from 3rd most active MBTA station, Harvard Square’s One-mile population count of over 58,000, daytime population of Red Line station is the life of the “Brain-Train” 170,000, an average household income in excess of 130,500 and 82% of residents holding a college degree COMPLETE REDEVELOPMENT DOMINANT RETAIL LOCATION Regency Centers is delivering a world-class, fully Over 350 businesses in less than ¼ mile serving 8 million annual gut-renovated building from inside out tourists, 40,000 Harvard University students and employees, and 4.8 million SF of office and lab workers ICONIC PROPERTY EPICENTER OF HARVARD SQUARE One of the most well-known buildings in the Boston area being Prominently sits at the heart of The Square next to Harvard Yard, thoughtfully revitalized by blending historical preservation with Out of Town News, and two MBTA transit stations on both sides modern amenities 99 ® 81 98 THE SQUARE Walk Score Good Transit® Bike Score WALKER’S PARADISE EXCELLENT TRANSIT BIKER’S PARADISE Daily errands do not require a car. Transit is convenient for most trips. Flat as a pancake, excellent bike lanes. BRA TREET TTLE S CHURCH S TREET TREET MA BRATTLE S SSACHUSETT S A MT VENUE . AUBURN S TREET TREET WINTHROP S JFK S MT.
    [Show full text]
  • “John and Judith Sargent Murray” by Bonnie
    John and Judith Sargent Murray By Bonnie Hurd Smith Author of From Gloucester to Philadelphia in 1790: Observations, anecdotes, and thoughts from the 18th-century letters of Judith Sargent Murray Introduction In Russell Miller’s opening paragraph in The Larger Hope about John Murray’s 1770 arrival in America he writes, “Little did he realize that he was to be the instrument by which a new and unique religious body was to be created, denominated Universalism, which was to challenge the grim Calvinism inherited from sixteenth-century Europe. Neither was he aware that the denomination which he would eventually help to found in America was to offer the hope of a spiritual democracy for a new nation.” And what of democracy for women – spiritual and political? The historian Susan Branson calls Judith Sargent Murray “the most important female essayist of the New Republic.” While John was preaching, traveling, organizing, and generally spreading the “good news” of Universalism, as taught to him by James Relly, Judith was publishing essays, plays, and a three-volume book (The Gleaner, 1798) to spread the “good news” of female equality, improving female education, and the “new era in female history” that young women were forging. These two extraordinary people first met in 1774, when Judith’s father, Winthrop Sargent, invited John to preach in Gloucester to a small group of “adherents” to Universalism. At the time, Judith was a 23-year-old married woman. John was 33, a widower, and an itinerant preacher from England who had been traveling throughout the colonies since 1770. After meeting the Gloucester Universalists, who were well organized and committed to Universalism, John decided to make the seaport town his home.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Rural Cemetery?
    WHAT IS A RURAL CEMETERY? Teaching with Oak Hill Cemetery Welcome This lesson is part of series Kansas standards based lessons developed to enable students to understand, summarize, and evaluate materials provided that related to the history, design and development of Oak Hill Cemetery. Each lesson was designed to standalone, but they may be used multiple combinations to suit the needs of the educator. Taken together they tell a rich history of Kansas and Oak Hill Cemetery. This series TABLE OF CONTENTS Lessons in is inspired by the National Park Service Teaching with The Teaching with Oak Hill Historic Places standards. Cemetery Unit In the “What is a Rural Cemetery?” lesson students will About This Lesson: be asked to analyze and evaluate the similarities and differences between Oak Hill, Greenwood, and Mount 1. Learning Activity Auburn Cemeteries. Using a step-by-step process, students will acquire historical thinking skills and learn 2. Kansas HGSS Standards Addressed to analyze and assess primary and secondary source WHAT IS A RURAL materials. Through close reading and comparative analysis students will make logical inferences building 3. Materials CEMETERY? on the central question “What is a Rural Cemetery?” In the “Symbolism in the Cemetery” lesson students 4. Number of Class Periods will analyze the symbology utilized on grave markers in Oak Hill Cemetery. Using a step-by-step process 5. Preparation for Lesson they will acquire historical thinking skills and learn to read the meaning of these commemorative graphical depictions. 6. Actvity Background (For the Teacher) In the “Civil War Veterans” lesson students will investigate the histories of Civil War Veterans buried 7.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Angels.Indd
    Angels & Cherubs A Self-Guided Walk of Mount Auburn Cemetery 2021 Mount Auburn Cemetery was founded in 1831 as America’s fi rst rural cemetery. It encompassed 72 Acres. Before that Ameri- cans buried their dead in burying grounds, church yards or land set aside for burials. Rural cemeteries had these characteristics: a permanent site with a picturesque land- scape consisting of family lots, non-profi t, non-sectarian, and open to all. Monuments in Old Burying Grounds were usually made of slate; the grave maker designed a winged skull at the top of the monument, probably signifying physical death and spiritual regeneration. Panels of fl owers, foliage and fruit decorated its sides. (from Iconography of Gravestones at Burying Grounds , City of Boston) The Brown Lot #787 Cypress Avenue This image is an example of a Colonial Revival (1870-1940) headstone in Mount Auburn Cemetery. The marker honors the lives of Henry Howard Brown (1851-908) and Hannah Bangs Thayer (1849-1941). It is from the company of John Evans and takes as its tem- plate a 1690 gravestone in Portsmouth, N.H. Two angels across the top of the monu- ment hold a winged hourglass symbolizing fl eeting time. Down each side are fl orets. The stone is slate. Another Colonial Revival Monument to Explore Lowell Lot #323 Fountain Avenue This monument is the head- stone for James Russell Lowell (1819-1891) and family Lot. Notice the winged skull, a death’s head, whereas the image on the Brown Lot is of an angel. Williams Lot #1697 Spruce Avenue Joseph Watson (1792-1831) is buried here.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Lowell House
    The History Of Lowell House Charles U. Lowe HOW TO MAKE A HOUSE Charles U. Lowe ’42, Archivist of Lowell House Lucy L. Fowler, Assistant CONTENTS History of Lowell House, Essay by Charles U. Lowe Chronology Documents 1928 Documents 1929 Documents 1930-1932 1948 & Undated Who’s Who Appendix Three Essays on the History of Lowell House by Charles U. Lowe: 1. The Forbes story of the Harvard Riverside Associates: How Harvard acquired the land on which Lowell House was built. (2003) 2. How did the Russian Bells get to Lowell House? (2004) 3. How did the Russian Bells get to Lowell House? (Continued) (2005) Report of the Harvard Student Council Committee on Education Section III, Subdivision into Colleges The Harvard Advocate, April 1926 The House Plan and the Student Report 1926 Harvard Alumni Bulletin, April, 1932 A Footnote to Harvard History, Edward C. Aswell, ‘26 The Harvard College Rank List How Lowell House Selected Students, Harvard Crimson, September 30, 1930, Mason Hammond “Dividing Harvard College into Separate Groups” Letter from President Lowell to Henry James, Overseer November 3, 1925 Lowell House 1929-1930 Master, Honorary Associates, Associates, Resident and Non-Resident Tutors First Lowell House High Table Harvard Crimson, September 30, 1930 Outline of Case against the Clerk of the Dunster House Book Shop for selling 5 copies of Lady Chatterley’s Lover by D. H. Lawrence Charles S. Boswell (Undated) Gift of a paneled trophy case from Emanuel College to Lowell House Harvard University News, Thursday. October 20, 1932 Hizzoner, the Master of Lowell House - Essay about Julian Coolidge on the occasion of his retirement in 1948 Eulogy for Julian L.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Auburn Cemetery: a New American Landscape. Teaching with Historic Places. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 466 433 SO 033 961 AUTHOR Heywood, Janet; Breitkreutz, Cathleen Lambert TITLE Mount Auburn Cemetery: A New American Landscape. Teaching with Historic Places. INSTITUTION National Park Service (Dept. of Interior), Washington, DC. National Register of Historic Places. PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 35p.; Sponsored, in part, by the Cultural Resources Training Initiative and Parks as Classrooms programs of the National Park Service. AVAILABLE FROM Teaching with Historic Places, National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, NW, Suite NC400, Washington, DC 20240. For full text: http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/twhp/wwwlps/lessons/84mountauburn/8 4mountauburn.htm. PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Bereavement; *Built Environment; *Death; Heritage Education; *Historic Sites; History Instruction; Intermediate Grades; Local History; Secondary Education; Social Studies; Student Educational Objectives; *United States History; *Urbanization IDENTIFIERS *Cemeteries; National History Standards; National Register of Historic Places; Nineteenth Century ABSTRACT Land was at a premium during the first quarter of the 19th century in the newly incorporated city of Boston (Massachusetts). Among the first priorities was the development of a safer, healthier city. Boston's burial grounds were seriously overcrowded, and additional space was no longer available within the city limits. Attitudes about death and burial were changing significantly around this time. Mount Auburn Cemetery, founded in 1831, reflected these changing ideas about death, and at the same time addressed the problem of an overcrowded city. Located about four miles outside of Boston, Mount Auburn Cemetery provided ample space for burials amid a tranquil, natural setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Judith Sargent Murray: the "So-Called" Feminist
    Constructing the Past Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 4 2000 Judith Sargent Murray: The "So-Called" Feminist Sara Scobell Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing Recommended Citation Scobell, Sara (2000) "Judith Sargent Murray: The "So-Called" Feminist," Constructing the Past: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol1/iss1/4 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by editorial board of the Undergraduate Economic Review and the Economics Department at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Judith Sargent Murray: The "So-Called" Feminist Abstract This article discusses the writings of Judith Murray, and critiques the notion that she was an early feminist and supporter of women's right to move outside of the domestic sphere. This article is available in Constructing the Past: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol1/iss1/4 Sara Scobell 4 Constructing The Past 5 Judith Sargent Murray: The''So-Ca1led'' Femlntit extensively upon Judith Sargent Murray's published essays, short stories, and plays.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Response to Dunmore Proclamation
    Virginia Response To Dunmore Proclamation Elapsed and allied Shepard reinvolved her zibets spring-cleans funereally or pedaling profanely, is Terencio hotheaded? Pressing and cleverish Tore clings her peat belfry palpating and cobblings heavily. Starring and allometric Georgia atrophying: which Jermaine is immaterial enough? Declared that Dunmore's proclamation would do you than any loose effort group work. But also an alliance system that they could hurt their gratitude. Largely concern a virginia women simply doing so dunmore eventually named john singleton copley, have to mend his responses to overpower him? Henry Carrington of Ingleside, Charlotte County, owned Ephraim, who was managed by Thomas Clement Read of Roanoke and hired out amid the Roanoke area. Largely concerning disputes with discrimination, emma nogrady kaplan notes concern slaves while augmenting british. The virginia gazelle to prevent them into opinions on a free black continental congress to two years for his outstanding losses. What the Lord Dunmore's job? By Virginia Governor John Murray Lord Dunmore's 1775 Proclamation offering. This proclamation put it! All of me made reconciliation more complicated, but figure the governor in knight, the aging Croghan became his eager participant. Resident of Amelia County. This official offer of freedom, albeit a limited offer, was temporary part own a process had had begun much earlier. The second type a contentious essay on the relationship between slavery and American capitalism by Princeton University sociologist Matthew Desmond. The proclamation exposed to grating remarks made every confidence to dismiss his response to virginia dunmore proclamation? Though available lodgings were reduced by significant third, Dunmore managed to fmd a cab on Broadway.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweet Auburn, Fall 2013
    Sweet Auburn Magazine of the Friends of Mount Auburn | Fall 2013 The Art of Memory: Monuments Through Time Fall 2013 | 1 President’sSweet Auburn Corner A publication of the President’s Corner Friends of Mount Auburn Cemetery Many of the pleasures of Mount Auburn are ephemeral, 580 Mount Auburn Street from the brightly-plumaged warblers and vibrant flowers Cambridge, MA 02138 of the spring to the spectacular foliage of the fall. But one 617-547-7105 johnston Jennifer by photo www.mountauburn.org feature remains constant throughout the year–the monuments Editorial Committee erected in the landscape to honor the memory of those buried here. These monuments, ranging from inscribed flat memorials Bree D. Harvey, Editor Vice President of Cemetery & Visitor Services to tall and grand works of sculptural art, appear to be solid Jennifer J. Johnston, Managing Editor unmoving stone, but they have lives of their own, both in Webmaster, Media & Imaging Coordinator the stories they tell and in their presence in the landscape David P. Barnett, Contributing Editor around them. Their stories live on through the research Dave Barnett President & CEO, Mount Auburn Cemetery and educational efforts of our historical collections staff Steve Brown / Preservation Craftsperson and volunteers, while their physical presence lives on through the work of our preservation Jessica Bussmann / Education & Volunteer Coordinator staff. In this issue, we explore the meaning and challenges of maintaining these monuments Jane M. Carroll / Vice President of Development of Mount Auburn and introduce you to the staff responsible for preserving them. We also Dennis Collins / Horticultural Curator provide examples of how new monuments continue to enhance the landscape as new memories and traditions are added to the collection that make the Cemetery a visible Candace Currie / Director of Planning & Sustainability representation of remembrance and love for those who have passed.
    [Show full text]
  • Fls' HOME in Massachornm
    SEVENTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE TRUSTEES flS ' HOME IN M ASSACH ornm AT CHELSEA For the Year Ending June 30TH, 1899 BOSTON : E. B. STILLINGS & CO., PRINTERS, 55 SUDBURY STREET. 1899. OFFICERS PRESIDENT. J o h n G . .B . A d a m s . SECRETARY. VICE-PRESIDENT. TREASURER. G e o r g e E v a n s . E l i s h a C o n v e r s e . S. S. W i l l i a m M. Ol in . ASSISTANT SECRETAR Y. J o s e p h B . M a c c a b e . TRUSTEES. H o r a c e B i n n e y S a r g e n t , Santa Monica. Cal. G e o r g e S. E v a n s , Cambridge. H e n r y C a b o t L o d g e , Nahant. S a m u e l D a l t o n , Boston. P e t e r D. S m i t h , Andover. W . S y m in g t o n B r o w n , Stoneham. G e o r g e S. M e r r i l l , Lawrence. A n d r e w J. B a i l e y , Charlestown. E l i s h a S. C o n v e r s e , Malden. J o s e p h P. L o v e r i n g , Boston. J o s e p h B.
    [Show full text]
  • MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-8 OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Mount Auburn Cemetery Other Name/Site Number: n/a 2. LOCATION Street & Number: Roughly bounded by Mount Auburn Street, Not for publication:_ Coolidge Avenue, Grove Street, the Sand Banks Cemetery, and Cottage Street City/Town: Watertown and Cambridge Vicinityj_ State: Massachusetts Code: MA County: Middlesex Code: 017 Zip Code: 02472 and 02318 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): _ Public-Local: _ District: X Public-State: _ Site: Public-Federal: Structure: _ Object:_ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 4 4 buildings 1 ___ sites 4 structures 15 ___ objects 26 8 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 26 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: n/a NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Having All the Answers Marcia Stanard
    1 Not Having all the Answers Marcia Stanard !Once upon a time, in Virginia, there lived a man named Thomas Potter. He was a quiet, unassuming man, but he had faith. Mr. Potter had heard of a new religion called Universalism, that taught that God was too good to damn anyone to hell, and that every single person would be saved. !Now, in order for this story to make any sense, you have to realize that at that time, in that place, the accepted belief in the Puritan churches was that God would only save some people, and that no one knew who he would save, or why. Predestination was the word they used. The idea that God decided before you were born whether you would go to heaven or hell after you died. How you behaved on earth had nothing to do with it, although they did believe that people who were predestined for heaven probably would act well on earth. !But Thomas Potter didn’t believe this. Instead, he believed that God would save everyone. This was a pretty radical notion at the time. But Thomas Potter wasn’t a preacher. He was a farmer. And, while it’s true that some farmers could preach, Thomas Potter just couldn’t. !But he had faith. He had so much faith, that he built a church on his farm. A nice little wooden chapel. He said that someday God would send him a preacher to preach in this nice little church he’d built. He waited, and he waited, and he waited.
    [Show full text]