DOCSLIB.ORG

A Womb of One's Own?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Womb of One's Own? A Womb of One’s Own? – The Legal Implications of Ectogenesis A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Philosophy in the Faculty of Law 2013 Amy Victoria Rollings School of Law 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................ 2 Table of cases ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Table of Legislation and Similar Instruments ........................................................................ 7 Abstract .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Declaration ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Copyright Statement ...................................................................................................................... 11 Dedication and Acknowledgments .......................................................................................... 12 Chapter One: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 13 1.1 Tomorrow’s Politics - Why Now? ........................................................................................... 14 1.2 ‘First of all, do no harm’ .......................................................................................................... 16 1.3 Definitional Issues .................................................................................................................... 17 1.4 Chapter Outline ........................................................................................................................ 18 1.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 22 Chapter Two: The Road to Ectogenesis ................................................................................. 23 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 23 2.2 Rationale for primary legislation on ectogenesis ..................................................................... 26 2.3 IVF Technology - too big a risk? ............................................................................................. 30 2.4 ‘Test-tube Babies’: A Cause for Concern? .............................................................................. 31 2.5 Early IVF Legislation ............................................................................................................... 35 2.5.1 The Warnock Report ......................................................................................................... 36 2.6 Assessing the harms of ectogenic research .............................................................................. 37 2.7 How can we begin human research into ectogenesis (If allowed to go ahead at all)? ............. 41 2.7.1 From Animal Research to Human Embryos ..................................................................... 42 2.7.2 Would research towards ectogenesis be ethical? .............................................................. 44 2.7.3 Risk versus benefit ............................................................................................................ 46 2.7.4 Ectogenic Research: Moving Beyond Fourteen Days ...................................................... 50 2.7.5 A New Warnock Committee for Ectogenesis? ................................................................. 55 2.8 Research on the living ex utero foetus ..................................................................................... 55 2.8.1 Foetuses in research .......................................................................................................... 56 2.8.2 Foetuses in utero ............................................................................................................... 58 2.9 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 59 Chapter Three ................................................................................................................................... 62 Square pegs and round holes? – Viability and Birth for the Ectogenic Foetus ..... 62 PART I: Viability ........................................................................................................................... 65 3.1 Foetal Viability: A Legal Analysis .......................................................................................... 67 3.2 Medical Viability ..................................................................................................................... 70 3.3 When is the ectogenic foetus ‘viable’? .................................................................................... 71 3.4 Is Louise ‘viable’? .................................................................................................................... 74 PART II: Birth ............................................................................................................................... 75 3.5 When is the ectogenic foetus ‘born alive’? .............................................................................. 79 3.6 When is Louise ‘born alive’? ................................................................................................... 82 2 3.7 Conclusions .............................................................................................................................. 83 Chapter Four: Square Pegs and Round Holes – Switching off the Ectogenic Chamber .............................................................................................................................................. 85 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 85 4.2 The Law on Abortion: The Offences Against the Person Act 1861 ........................................ 88 4.3 The Abortion Act 1967 ............................................................................................................ 90 4.3.1 Abortion Act 1967 s.1(1): ‘...a pregnancy is terminated...’ .............................................. 90 4.4 Foetal Rights and the Female Body ......................................................................................... 93 4.4.1 A Foetal Right to Life? – Vo v France .............................................................................. 94 4.4.2 Context is Everything: Nothing and ‘Not Nothing’ .......................................................... 96 4.5 The ‘point of no return’ model ............................................................................................... 100 4.5.1 Pre-and Post-Conception Arrangements: A Panacea? .................................................... 103 4.5.2 A B and C: ‘This is not a case of dry legal contract’ ...................................................... 106 4.5.3 Exceptions to the ‘point of no return’ rule: The Disabled Foetus ................................... 107 4.6 Can Louise be ‘switched off’? ............................................................................................... 114 4.7 Parental Responsibility: who is the legal mother or father of the ectogenic child? ............... 117 4.8 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 120 Chapter Five: Drafting a regulatory framework for the development of ectogenesis ...................................................................................................................................... 122 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 122 5.2 Legal Elements of the Proposal ............................................................................................. 123 5.2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 123 5.2.1 (1) Stage I ........................................................................................................................ 124 5.2.2 Stage II ............................................................................................................................ 125 5.3 Chronological timeline of the embryo and foetal status: ....................................................... 126 5.3.1 Implantation .................................................................................................................... 126 5.3.2 From implantation to the twenty-third week of gestation ............................................... 127 5.3.3 Viability .......................................................................................................................... 127 5.3.4 Birth ................................................................................................................................ 127 5.3.5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phenomenological Perspectives on Technological Posthumanism
    Master thesis Phenomenological perspectives on technological posthumanism Supervisors: prof. dr. Paul Ziche, dr. Iris van der Tuin Date: 10. 8. 2017 Name: Tomáš Čech Student number: 5656664 Number of Words: 24 678 i Content 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Posthumanism/transhumanism – how to make sense of it all ......................................................... 4 2.1. What is transhumanism and transhuman? ............................................................................... 7 2.2. Transhumanist perception of technology and science ........................................................... 11 2.3. Comparison between transhumanism and religion ................................................................ 13 2.4. In Summary ........................................................................................................................... 15 3. Debate about transhumanism ........................................................................................................ 15 3.1. Transhumanism as an ideology ............................................................................................. 17 3.2. Reaction to transhumanism - bioconservatism ...................................................................... 21 3.3. Bioconservative arguments – why transhumanism is not such a great idea .......................... 26 3.4. Human dignity and the transhumanism debate.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 1 2 Fall 2008
    Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 1 2 Fall 2008 Columbia University Journal of Bioethics And Supplement on BIOCEP Volume VI. No 1, Fall 2008 Editorial Board Faculty Editors Editors-in-Chief Dr. John D. Loike Dr. Ruth L. Fischbach Copy Editors Soo Han Cover Design: “Entwine‖ Komal Kaothari Robyn Scheinder and Dr. John D. Loike Please send your comments to Dr. John D. Loike at: [email protected] Production & Creative Directors Robyn Scheinder Jana Bassman Web Version is available through the undergraduate page: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ Or through http://www.bioethicscolumbia.org/ Copyright 2008 by: Columbia University Center for Bioethics NO PART OF THIS JOURNAL MAY BE COPIED OR USED WITHOUT PERMISSION. All views in the articles reflect those of the authors only. Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 Introductions by Dr. John Loike and Dr. Ruth Fischbach ............ …………………………………..…….6-7 Section I: Genetics The Sound and the Fury By Katie O‘Neill and Wei-Jen Hsieh……………………………………………….. Majority Report: DNA Data-banking As an Opt-Out System By Emilia Javorsky and Robyn Schneider………………………………………... Could Genetic Research Interfere with Medicine? By Jorge Jara and Joanna Etra………………………………………………. Charging You for Being You By Elisa Fung and Gabriela Vargas…………………………………………. Section II: Stem Cells and Reproductive Medicine Altered Nuclear Transfer: A Novel Way of Developing Pluripotent Stem Cells By Sarah Eberle and Tabby Khan………………………………………………... Secrets and Lies: Mandating Disclosure in Oocyte Donation By Tiffany Hsieh………………………………………………………………….. Diagnosing Disability… And Keeping It by David Yin and John Tseng……………………………………………….. Section III: Neuroethics Programmed Free Will By Elisa Fung and Lindsay Kugler………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Volume III - Article 2 Legislating Limits on Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research Sïna A. Muscati1 Spring 2003 Copyright © 2003 University of Pittsburgh School of Law Journal of Technology Law and Policy Introduction Research on embryonic stem cells has generated great intrigue in the scientific community. Many medical researchers consider stem cell-based therapies to have the potential of treating a host of human ailments and yielding a number of medical benefits. They are motivated by the possibility of treating incurable diseases or facilitating effective treatment methods. Their enthusiasm is shared by many of those who are afflicted with these debilitating diseases. However, the methodology of this research raises numerous ethical and public policy concerns. The extraction of embryonic stem cells for research destroys the human embryo. This has generated a storm of debate about if, and in what circumstances, this research can be legally and ethically justified. The concerns are heightened further when embryos are created specifically for use in the very research that occasions their destruction. In response, numerous countries have passed legislation that attempts to control some of the more controversial aspects of embryonic stem cell research. For example, in May 2002, Canada introduced draft legislation that would govern and restrict a number of practices related to this fast-growing field of research. 1 L.L.B., third year, University of Ottawa; B.Sc. (Hons.) 2001, Carleton University. The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Centre of Innovation Law and Policy of the University of Toronto. The author also wishes to thank Professor Ian R. Kerr of the University of Ottawa for his guidance throughout the writing of this Article.
    [Show full text]
  • Could Artificial Wombs End the Abortion Debate?
    Philosophy Faculty Works Philosophy Summer 2005 Could Artificial ombsW End the Abortion Debate? Christopher Kaczor Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Christopher Kaczor, “Could Artificial ombsW End the Abortion Debate?” National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 5.2 (Summer 2005): 73-91. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Could Artificial Wombs End the Abortion Debate? Christopher Kaczor Although artificial wombs may seem fanciful when first considered, certain trends suggest they may become reality. Between 1945 and the 1970s, the weight at which premature infants could survive dropped dramatically, moving from 1000 grams to around 400 grams.1 In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court, in deciding Roe v. Wade, considered viability to begin around twenty-eight weeks. In 2000, premature babies were reported to have survived at eighteen weeks.2 Advanced incubators already in existence save thousands of children born prematurely each year. It is highly likely that such incubators will become even more advanced as technology progresses. Researchers are working to make super-advanced incubators, “artificial wombs,” a reality. Temple University professor Dr. Thomas Schaffer hopes to save premature infants using a synthetic amniotic fluid of oxygen-rich perfluorocarbons. Lack of funding has thus far prevented tests on human infants born prematurely, but Shaffer has successfully transferred premature lamb fetuses from their mother’s wombs and used the synthetic amniotic fluid to sustain their lives.3 At Cornell University, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mothers on Mothers: Maternal Readings of Popular Television
    From Supernanny to Gilmore Girls, from Katie Price to Holly Willoughby, a MOTHERS ON wide range of examples of mothers and motherhood appear on television today. Drawing on questionnaires completed by mothers across the UK, this MOTHERS ON MOTHERS book sheds new light on the varied and diverse ways in which expectant, new MATERNAL READINGS OF POPULAR TELEVISION and existing mothers make sense of popular representations of motherhood on television. The volume examines the ways in which these women find pleasure, empowerment, escapist fantasy, displeasure and frustration in popular depictions of motherhood. The research seeks to present the MATERNAL READINGS OF POPULAR TELEVISION voice of the maternal audience and, as such, it takes as its starting REBECCA FEASEY point those maternal depictions and motherwork representations that are highlighted by this demographic, including figures such as Tess Daly and Katie Hopkins and programmes like TeenMom and Kirstie Allsopp’s oeuvre. Rebecca Feasey is Senior Lecturer in Film and Media Communications at Bath Spa University. She has published a range of work on the representation of gender in popular media culture, including book-length studies on masculinity and popular television and motherhood on the small screen. REBECCA FEASEY ISBN 978-0343-1826-6 www.peterlang.com PETER LANG From Supernanny to Gilmore Girls, from Katie Price to Holly Willoughby, a MOTHERS ON wide range of examples of mothers and motherhood appear on television today. Drawing on questionnaires completed by mothers across the UK, this MOTHERS ON MOTHERS book sheds new light on the varied and diverse ways in which expectant, new MATERNAL READINGS OF POPULAR TELEVISION and existing mothers make sense of popular representations of motherhood on television.
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing Roe: Property Over Privacy
    Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons Faculty Scholarship 1-1-2012 Reframing Roe: Property over Privacy Becca Rausch Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons Recommended Citation Becca Rausch, Reframing Roe: Property over Privacy, 27 BERKELEY J. GENDER L. & JUST. 28 (2012). https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty/262 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reframing Roe: Property over Privacy* Rebecca L. Rauscht ABSTRACT Roe v. Wade has received much criticism from both sides of the political spectrum. These critiques diverge divisively but for one commonality. Specifically, commentators from both the pro- and anti-choice camps have expressed concern about the absence of an express constitutional right to privacy, upon which the Supreme Court in Roe based its finding of a "fundamental" right to abortion. This lack of express constitutional provision renders the Roe decision, and its resulting reproductive rights, vulnerable. Further, pro-choice advocates find fault with the privacy basis because it yields no positive rights to funding or governmental support for accessing abortion services. When based upon a right to privacy, the right to abortion is relegated to the land of negative rights. The negative right to privacy might provide some women with reproductive choice free from government intrusion, but for other women-those with limited resources-the so-called "choice" becomes nonexistent.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Grinin, Leonid; Grinin, Anton
    www.ssoar.info The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Grinin, Leonid; Grinin, Anton Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Monographie / monograph Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Grinin, L., & Grinin, A. (2016). The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems. Moscow: Uchitel Publishing House. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57569-8 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Basic Digital Peer Publishing-Lizenz This document is made available under a Basic Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ The International Center for Education and Social and Humanitarian Studies Volgograd Center for Social Research Leonid Grinin and Anton Grinin The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems Moscow 2016 ББК 30г 60.5 63 Leonid Grinin and Anton Grinin The Cybernetic Revolution and the Forthcoming Epoch of Self-Regulating Systems. Moscow: Moscow branch of Uchitel Publishing House, 2016. – 216 pp. ISBN 978-5-7057-4877-8 The monograph presents the ideas about the main changes that occurred in the devel- opment of technologies from the emergence of Homo sapiens till present time and outlines the prospects of their development in the next 30–60 years and in some respect until the end of the twenty-first century. What determines the transition of a society from one level of development to another? One of the most fundamental causes is the global technological transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inaccessible Road to Motherhood - the Tragic Consequence of Not Having Reproductive Policies for Israelis with Disabilities
    30.1 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF GENDER AND LAW THE INACCESSIBLE ROAD TO MOTHERHOOD - THE TRAGIC CONSEQUENCE OF NOT HAVING REPRODUCTIVE POLICIES FOR ISRAELIS WITH DISABILITIES DORON DORFMAN* INTRODUCTION The desire of an individual to become a parent can be very strong, especially in "child-centric" societies, where the idea of having children and raising a family is highly valued. In those societies, the prominent pro-natal nature translates into policies and laws regulating reproduction. The Jewish-Israeli society is a prime example of such a society where the use of state-funded Assisted Reproduction Technologies ("ARTs") is the highest in the world-eight times higher than the international average.1 However, the road to becoming a parent is not as smooth for all members of Israeli society. A recent case that went all the way to the Israeli Supreme Court proved how the current Israeli reproductive policies, particularly surrounding third-party reproduction methods such as adoption or surrogacy, are inaccessible to people with disabilities (among other minority groups) who share the same great desire to become parents.2 * J.S.D. Candidate, Stanford Law School. Sitting in my office at one of the top floors of a Tel Aviv office building one morning, a few weeks before quitting my job at a private law firm and moving to Stanford, little did I know how a short news article I accidently stumbled upon would lead to my involvement in the representation in the incredible case that stands at the heart of this piece, and later to the writing of it. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to get to know Ora and work with Avi Setty, her devoted attorney, and with Roni Rothler from the Disability Rights Clinic at Bar Ilan University's faculty of law, and want to thank them for their terrific work.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts: Oral Presentations *All Oral Presentations Will Take Place in the Devon Room at the Times Listed Below*
    Abstracts: Oral Presentations *All oral presentations will take place in the Devon Room at the times listed below* Augustine & Culture Seminar Program (ACSP) (2:00 p.m.) Playing Mother: The Daunting Possibilities of Artificial Womb Technology Author: Hanlon, Erin Advisor: Dr. Peter Busch So often in our society, technological advances are met with the reaction that we must be wary of “playing God.” Yet, we often ignore this concern when the technology is created for the betterment of society and to solve a critical problem. This was the case for the CHOP research team that created an extra-uterine physiologic support system for the extreme premature lamb, a bio-bag system that could support an extremely premature lamb within a womb-like environment that would allow for survival and development up to a fuller point of gestation. This research, when translated to humans, would give extremely premature babies an increased chance of survival and ability to thrive post-birth with limited health complications. What I focused my research on is, what comes after this technology? We most likely will continue building upon this research until a baby could survive within this system from as early as conception. With a fully artificial womb and no need for a woman to carry a child, what possibilities does this allow for? How does this change women’s role within society? Would we even need women involved in the process? Could women donate eggs as men donate sperm and men can have a child independently? Could this possibly eliminate the abortion debate? What kind of policies will we need surrounding fetuses and the process? What potential risks does this allow for? The very real possibility of artificial womb technology brings to light many questions and ethical dilemmas that we, as a global community, may face in the very near future and we must begin to explore these possibilities in order to make the most ethical and just decisions for the future of our society.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Staff Reclaim Weekly Pay a Quota System on Asylum Seekers Has Sparked a Heat- Ed Debate
    The big red ball Bungee running in Wye Marky magic A fiery film The Juggling Club show us A new way to raise money for Felix reaches The End with DJ Our reviewer turns up the heat how it’s done, page 8 the tsunami appeal, page 11 Marky and friends, page 18 with Ladder 49, page 22 The student newspaper of Imperial College ● Established 1949 ● Issue 1313 ● Thursday 27 January 2005 ● www.felixonline.co.uk Immigration issues The Conservative Party’s recent proposal to introduce Student staff reclaim weekly pay a quota system on asylum seekers has sparked a heat- ed debate. Felix looks at the By Dave Edwards monthly pay was made in Operations Committee Imperial College Union, told said: “It was acknowledged national newspapers’ views Editor order to cut costs and make reversed the decision. One Felix: “The situation with that paying students on a on this contentious issue. it easier for the College to co- student, who has worked for part time student staff has monthly cycle was leading to uNEWS page 2 Following a highly unpopu- ordinate payments. Student the College for two years, been unfortunate, and I hope recruitment problems in our lar change to monthly pay in staff complained about a cautiously welcomed the those who have been incon- organisation.” State of the Union December, students who work range of issues, including a news: “We’re all incredibly venienced will be compensat- Meanwhile, the introduc- The President’s views on hall part time for Imperial College lack of communication, insuf- pleased, but as far as I’m ed appropriately.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Benefits of Ectogenesis Outweigh Potential Harms
    Unique benefits of ectogenesis outweigh potential harms Citation of the final article: Kendal, Evie 2019, Unique benefits of ectogenesis outweigh potential harms, Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 719-722. Published in its final form at https://doi.org/10.1042/etls20190112. This is the accepted manuscript. © 2019, The Author Reprinted with permission. Downloaded from DRO: http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30131603 DRO Deakin Research Online, Deakin University’s Research Repository Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code: 00113B Title Unique benefits of ectogenesis outweigh potential harms. Author details Dr Evie Kendal Lecturer of Bioethics and Health Humanities Deakin University, School of Medicine Waurn Ponds, Victoria, Australia [email protected] Abstract This article will consider some of the ethical issues concerning ectogenesis technology, including possible misuse, social harms and safety risks. The article discusses three common objections to ectogenesis, namely that artificial gestation transgresses nature, risks promoting cloning and genetic engineering of offspring, and would lead to the commodification of children. Counterbalancing these concerns are an appeal to women’s rights, reproductive autonomy, and the rights of the infertile to access appropriate assisted reproductive technologies. The article concludes that the unique benefits of promoting the development of ectogenesis technology to prospective parents and children, outweigh any potential harms. Introduction Full ectogenesis refers to the artificial gestation of human embryos until independent viability, without the need for a woman’s womb at any stage.1 It represents the closing of a gap between existing artificial reproductive technologies, including in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and humidicrib incubation, to cover the entire development period.
    [Show full text]
  • In Our Lives: a Resource Centre MUSIC in the WOMB the Value of Creating a Musical Environment Very Early
    Music in Our Lives: A Resource Centre MUSIC IN THE WOMB the value of creating a musical environment very early What a foetus hears Can a baby hear music played to it before it is born? If so, How to play music to your unborn baby will it remember what it has heard, post-birth? Are there any benefits to playing music to an What kind of music to choose unborn baby, and if so, what is the best kind of music to play? We answer these key questions Effects, before and after birth in simple terms, and direct readers who would like to know more to some Our recommendations in-depth, technical, sources of information. Further reading The developing foetus–what it can hear If you are playing the music directly into your stomach, it is recommended that you should limit this to no more From the moment she knows she is expecting a baby, than one hour per day, as it is up close and may risk a woman’s behaviour and lifestyle is bound to change: over-stimulating the baby7. Choose a time when you are from the things she eats and drinks, the medicines she relaxed, and use it as an opportunity for yourself also: takes, to the exercise she does. All aspects of life now need careful consideration because of possible implications “A perfect time to stimulate your baby would be when you for the unborn child. decide to take a nap or rest during the day… Although Much research has been carried out into the development over-stimulation will not harm your baby physically, it can of a foetus’s hearing while in the womb.
    [Show full text]