DOCSLIB.ORG

DRAFT HERITAGE BUILDINGS and PLACES RECOVERY PROGRAMME for GREATER CHRISTCHURCH Draft, Not Government Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DRAFT HERITAGE BUILDINGS and PLACES RECOVERY PROGRAMME for GREATER CHRISTCHURCH Draft, Not Government Policy DRAFT HERITAGE BUILDINGS AND PLACES RECOVERY PROGRAMME FOR GREATER CHRISTCHURCH Draft, not government policy Christchurch Arts Centre. Conservation work under way. Source: Ross Becker 17 December 2013 D‐0511860 Heritage Recovery Programme – draft, not government policy Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 3 Section One: What does the Heritage Recovery Programme deliver? .................................................. 5 Section Two: What has been happening? .............................................................................................. 8 Section Three: Heritage Recovery Projects .......................................................................................... 14 Project 1: Retaining heritage buildings and places .......................................................................... 16 Project 2: Determining the best methods of strengthening heritage buildings .............................. 19 Project 3: Reusing heritage fabric retrieved from heritage and character buildings ...................... 20 Project 4: Ensuring that District Plan regulation assists recovery ................................................... 22 Project 5: Identifying and restoring sites of significance to Ngāi Tahu ........................................... 23 Project 6: Retrieving archaeological information and artefacts ...................................................... 25 Project 7: Conserving artefacts recovered from archaeological sites ............................................. 27 Project 8: Keeping memory and awareness alive ............................................................................ 29 Appendices Appendix One: The partner agencies ............................................................................................. 31 Appendix Two: The history and heritage of greater Christchurch ................................................. 34 Appendix Three: The Canterbury Earthquake Heritage Buildings Fund ......................................... 40 Appendix Four: Statutory documents ............................................................................................. 41 This document is not government policy or the policy of any of the agencies that contributed to its development. It is a draft Recovery Programme prepared to seek feedback. 2 Heritage Recovery Programme – draft, not government policy Executive Summary In greater Christchurch, heritage agencies have been working together to assess and conserve heritage buildings and places since the first earthquake in September 2010. At the same time, they have prepared this draft Heritage Buildings and Places Recovery Programme (‘Heritage Recovery Programme’) to record the work that has been done, the work that is under way, and future initiatives. 1 The Heritage Recovery Programme sets out the major achievements to date (pages 8‐13) and eight heritage recovery projects, most of which are under way, to: 1 retain heritage buildings and places 2 determine the best methods of strengthening heritage buildings 3 reuse heritage fabric retrieved from heritage and character buildings 4 ensure that District Plan regulation assists recovery 5 identify and restore sites of significance to Ngāi Tahu 6 retrieve archaeological information and artefacts 7 conserve artefacts recovered from archaeological sites 8 keep memory and awareness alive. Scope The Heritage Recovery Programme responds to heritage issues across all of greater Christchurch, that is: the districts of the Christchurch City Council, the Selwyn District Council, and the Waimakariri District Council, and the coastal marine area adjacent to these districts. It is one of three programmes that guide the cultural recovery of greater Christchurch; the other two are the: Arts and Culture Recovery Programme2 Spaces, Place and People Plan for Sport and Recreation in greater Christchurch.3 How was the Heritage Recovery Programme developed? The Ministry for Culture and Heritage (MCH) prepared the Heritage Recovery Programme working with: the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA), Ngāi Tahu, the New Zealand Historic Places Trust (NZHPT), Christchurch City Council (CCC), Waimakariri District Council (WDC) and Selwyn District Council (SDC) (‘the partner agencies’). Appendix One provides information on the partner agencies. The Heritage Recovery Programme is based on a scoping paper, released in June 2012, which is available on MCH’s website.4 A wide range of heritage and property groups provided input into the scoping paper. MCH is now seeking feedback on the Heritage Recovery Programme. 1 Previously known as the ‘Heritage Buildings and Cultural Places Recovery Programme’. Work on this Programme commenced in September 2011, following the release of the draft Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch. 2 Previously known as the ‘Arts, Culture and Heritage Collections Recovery Programme’. 3 Previously known as the ‘Sport and Recreation Recovery Programme’. 3 Heritage Recovery Programme – draft, not government policy The partner agencies developed the Heritage Recovery Programme in accordance with CERA’s Recovery Strategy for Greater Christchurch (‘Recovery Strategy’), which in turn is implemented under the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011 (‘the CER Act’). It does not override the CER Act or any other statutory requirements. While the Heritage Recovery Programme is a non‐binding document, it sets out the basis on which the partner agencies will seek to achieve the heritage‐ related cultural goals set out in the Recovery Strategy. 4 http://www.mch.govt.nz/news‐events/news/heritage‐recovery‐programme 4 Heritage Recovery Programme – draft, not government policy Section One: What does the Heritage Recovery Programme deliver? Introduction Accounts of Canterbury’s heritage published before the 2010 and 2011 earthquakes often concentrate upon the richness of its built heritage, particularly Christchurch’s Gothic Revival architecture. The projects contained in the Heritage Recovery Programme reflect a determination to hold on to the region’s rich built heritage by retaining and strengthening heritage buildings, reusing heritage fabric and recording and interpreting ‘lost’ heritage. At the same time, the projects realise opportunities to better recognise and increase awareness of the depth and breadth of the region’s heritage traditions – particularly, sites associated with early Māori and European settlement. The Heritage Recovery Programme also recognises that there are unparalleled opportunities to design new buildings that future generations will regard as heritage, and to establish a distinctive city that incorporates new and old architecture in creative ways. There are significant challenges: considerable damage has occurred the costs of repairing and strengthening heritage buildings can be high there are difficulties securing insurance for heritage buildings the land beneath some heritage buildings is sub‐optimal the recovery needs to proceed as quickly as possible. The overall aim must be to ensure that heritage recovery is an integral part of the recovery of greater Christchurch, not a roadblock to this recovery. Objective Recognising the opportunities and challenges, the objective of the Heritage Recovery Programme is to achieve an appropriate balance between: retaining heritage buildings and places as an important part of greater Christchurch’s identity the need for wider earthquake recovery to proceed quickly and within available funding. Outcomes The following outcomes will be achieved to the extent possible within the time frames for the wider recovery and within available funding: 1 Heritage buildings and places contribute to a strong sense of identity, a quality urban environment, and tourism, which support the economic and cultural recovery of greater Christchurch. 2 Heritage agencies assist property owners where a collaborative approach can help to ensure heritage buildings are made safe and restored. 3 Heritage buildings and places are adapted to new uses, where appropriate, to ensure they have an ongoing function. 5 Heritage Recovery Programme – draft, not government policy 4 Heritage recovery recognises and celebrates Ngāi Tahu’s heritage. 5 Heritage materials are retrieved safely to enable their reuse, and a sample of Christchurch’s archaeological heritage is recovered through excavation and retained. What does the Heritage Recovery Programme cover? The Heritage Recovery Programme covers all land‐based heritage, including: heritage buildings, that is, buildings with recognised heritage value as established through registration under the Historic Places Act 1993 (HPA) or listing on a District Plan archaeological sites as defined in the HPA (section 2) heritage spaces and landscapes such as Cathedral, Victoria, Latimer and Cranmer Squares places of cultural significance to Ngāi Tahu, including wāhi tapu and wāhi taonga areas. The term ‘heritage building’ as used in the Heritage Recovery Programme may include structures, such as bridges and memorials. For a brief overview of the history and heritage of greater Christchurch, see Appendix Two (page 34). The Heritage Recovery Programme does not have statutory authority over property owners (private or public), but proposes to review whether existing regulation is appropriate (see ‘Ensuring that District Plan regulation assists recovery’, page 22.) It covers heritage material that is excavated
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Mw 6.3 Christchurch, New Zealand Earthquake of 22 February 2011
    THE MW 6.3 CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT THE CHRISTCHURCH, NEW ZEALAND EARTHQUAKE OF 22 FEBRUARY 2011 A FIELD REPORT BY EEFIT Sean Wilkinson Matthew Free Damian Grant David Boon Sarah Paganoni Anna Mason Elizabeth Williams Stuart Fraser Jenny Haskell Earthquake Field Investigation Team Institution of Structural Engineers 47 - 58 Bastwick Street London EC1V 3PS Tel 0207235 4535 Fax 0207235 4294 Email: [email protected] June 2011 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 3 1. INTRODUCTION 4 2. REGIONAL TECTONIC AND GEOLOGICAL SETTING 6 3. SEISMOLOGICAL ASPECTS 12 4. NEW ZEALAND BUILDING STOCK AND DESIGN PRACTICE 25 5. PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS 32 6. PERFORMANCE OF LIFELINES 53 7. GEOTECHNICAL ASPECTS 62 8. DISASTER MANAGEMENT 96 9. ECONOMIC LOSSES AND INSURANCE 108 10. CONCLUSIONS 110 11. REFERENCES 112 APPENDIX A: DETAILED RESIDENTIAL DAMAGE SURVEY 117 The Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake of 22 February 2011 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to express their thanks to the many individuals and organisations that have assisted with the EEFIT mission to Christchurch and in the preparation of this report. We thank Arup for enabling Matthew Free to attend this mission and the British Geological Survey for allowing David Boon to attend. We would also like to thank the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council for providing funding for Sean Wilkinson, Damian Grant, Elizabeth Paganoni and Sarah Paganoni to join the team. Their continued support in enabling UK academics to witness the aftermath of earthquakes and the effects on structures and the communities they serve is gratefully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Riccarton Cemetery 2007 1
    St Peter’s, Upper Riccarton, is the graveyard of owners and trainers of the great horses of the racing and trotting worlds. People buried here have been in charge of horses which have won the A. J. C. Derby, the V.R.C. Derby, the Oaks, Melbourne Cup, Cox Plate, Auckland Cup (both codes), New Zealand Cup (both codes) and Wellington Cup. Area 1 Row A Robert John Witty. Robert John Witty (‘Peter’ to his friends) was born in Nelson in 1913 and attended Christchurch Boys’ High School, College House and Canterbury College. Ordained priest in 1940, he was Vicar of New Brighton, St. Luke’s and Lyttelton. He reached the position of Archdeacon. Director of the British Sailors’ Society from 1945 till his death, he was, in 1976, awarded the Queen’s Service Medal for his work with seamen. Unofficial exorcist of the Anglican Diocese of Christchurch, Witty did not look for customers; rather they found him. He said of one Catholic lady: “Her priest put her on to me; they have a habit of doing that”. Problems included poltergeists, shuffling sounds, knockings, tapping, steps tramping up and down stairways and corridors, pictures turning to face the wall, cold patches of air and draughts. Witty heard the ringing of Victorian bells - which no longer existed - in the hallway of St. Luke’s vicarage. He thought that the bells were rung by the shade of the Rev. Arthur Lingard who came home to die at the vicarage then occupied by his parents, Eleanor and Archdeacon Edward Atherton Lingard. In fact, Arthur was moved to Miss Stronach’s private hospital where he died on 23 December 1899.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconnection to Cleared Site in Christchurch Architecture for the Rememberer
    Reconnection to Cleared Site in Christchurch Architecture for the Rememberer Abigail Michelle Thompson A thesis submitted in ful! lment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture (professional), The University of Auckland, 2012 Fig 1: Project. Surface study model by author. Abstract The loss of life and buildings due to the devastating and continuing earthquakes in Canterbury (since 9th September, 2010) have created a need to examine the issue of memory with concerns to architecture in a New Zealand context. This thesis was initiated with concern to addressing the cleared (destroyed, demolished) buildings of Christchurch and architecture’s role in reconnecting Cantabrians mnemonically to the cleared sites in their city. This is an investigation of architecture’s ability to trigger memories in order to speci! cally address the disorientation experienced by Cantabrians subsequent to the loss of built fabric in their city. The design intention is to propose an architectural method for reconnecting people’s memories with site, which will have implications to other sites throughout the city of Christchurch. Consequently, two signi! cant sites of destruction have been chosen, the Methodist Church site at 309 Durham St (community) and the house at 69 Sherborne St (domestic). With the only original material left on these cleared sites being the ground itself, two issues were made apparent. Firstly, that ground should play a signi! cant role in substantiating the memory of the site(s), and secondly the necessary task of designing a mnemonic language without tangible links (other than ground). Collective memory is examined with regards to theory by Maurice Halbwachs, Piere Nora, and Peter Carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Christchurch Street Names: B
    Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information Badger Street Named after Ronald Parklands Badger was a real estate Sylvia Street Information supplied "The property Smith Badger agent and a landowner in by Richard Greenaway market", The Press, (1880?-1946). New Brighton. in 2008. 19 October 1918, p 10 First appears in street directories in 1928. “Obituary, Mr R. S. Badger”, The Press, 18 September 1946, p 5 Baffin Street Named after Baffin Wainoni One of a number of streets Huron Street, “Chester Street West or “Tunnel’s first blast Island in the Arctic in a subdivision between Niagara Street, Cranmer Terrace?”, celebrated”, The Ocean of Northern Ottawa Road, Pages Road Ontario Place, The Press, 28 April Press, 22 July 2011, Canada. and Cuffs Road given Quebec Place, 1959, p 7 p A7 Canadian place names. Vancouver Information supplied in Crescent and Named because Canadian 2005 by Tim Baker in Winnipeg Place. engineers and workers an interview with Also Ottawa lived in the area while Margaret Harper. Road. working for Henry J. Kaiser Co of USA and building the Lyttelton road tunnel. Houses were built for them by Fletcher Construction. After the tunnel was opened in 1964, the Canadians went home and their houses were sold to locals. © Christchurch City Libraries February 2016 Page 1 of 172 Christchurch Street Names B Current name Former name Origin of name Suburb Additional information See Source Further information OR Named because they were near Ottawa Road. Named in 1959. Baigent Way Named after Steve Middleton Baigent was a former Riccarton/Wigram Baigent.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedral Working Group Recommendation Report
    CATHEDRAL WORKING GROUP RECOMMENDATION REPORT NOVEMBER 2016 Released by the Minister supporting Greater Christchurch Regeneration This document and its contents are confidential and shall not be distributed, published, copied or reproduced without the express written permission of the Minister Supporting Greater Christchurch Regeneration and the Church Property Trustees. VERSION ISSUE DATE REASON FOR ISSUE AUTHOR APPROVED FOR ISSUE 1 28.10.16 Draft for Review Bianca Hurrell, RCP Marcus Read, RCP 2 31.10.16 Draft to include Bianca Hurrell, RCP Marcus Read, RCP comments from Working Group Chair Regeneration 3 01.11.16 Edited and Proofed Anna Komink, Axiom Marcus Read, RCP Final Draft to CWG / Bianca Hurrell, RCP 4 07.11.16 Updates following Bianca Hurrell, RCP / Marcus Read, RCP / CWG meeting Anna Komink, Axiom Geoff Dangerfield, CWG Christchurch 5 21.11.16 Updates as Geoff Dangerfield, Geoff Dangerfield, provided to CWG CWG / Marcus Read, CWG / Marcus Read, for review RCP RCP 6 24.11.16 Final Draft providedGreater Geoff Dangerfield, Marcus Read, RCP / to CWG for review CWG / Marcus Read, Geoff Dangerfield, RCP CWG 7 25.11.16 Final Copy Geoff Dangerfield, Geoff Dangerfield, CWG / Marcus Read, CWG / Marcus Read, RCP RCP supporting Minister the by Released ii CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary 1 2.0 Recommendations 7 3.0 Introduction 9 4.0 Background and Context 12 5.0 Values and Requirements of the ChristChurch Cathedral 13 6.0 Heritage and Archaeological Review Regeneration16 7.0 Structural Review 21 8.0 Regeneration of the Square 27 9.0 Delivery
    [Show full text]
  • A History of the Barbadoes Street Cemetery
    A HISTORY OF THE BARBADOES S~REE~ 0EMET}~Y. (A) IR~RODUCTION. ( 1) G·eneral. A brief note on the location, division and religious composition of' the three cemeteries, and the signif­ icance of the Cemetery in the history of Christchurch. (2) Early European Settlement of Canterbury. A brief note on the early settlement of Christchurch, Banks Peninsula and the ~lains prior to the arrival of the Canterbury Pilgrims. / (3) Edward Gibbon Wakefield and an. exclusive Church of England Settlement. A brief note on Wakefield's idea of an exclusive Church of England settlemen~ in Canterbury. (4) The Siting and Surveying of Christchurch. A brief note on the acquisition: of land in Canterbury, the siting and Surveying of Christchurch by Captain ~oseph Thomas and Edward Jollie, and the provision made for cemetery reserves. (5) The Canterbury Pilgrims. A brief note on the arrival of the Canterbury Pilgrims, /) their first impressions, conditions, religious . G. composition and numbers. j (B) THE THREE CEMETERIES. (1851 - 1885). /' j (1) General. if< ·rr::!.o~Ac..T1or,j (1 - d . A brief note on the Church of Bngland, Dissenter.and Roman Catholic religious developMents during the early years and the provision made for ~esbyterian burials. Early burials and undertakers. (2) The Setting-up and nevelopment of the 8emeteries • ./ (a) ,Church of England Gemetery• ./(i) The F..arl y V'ears. / (ii) The Construcciion of the Mortuary Chapel. .iii) Consecreation of the Cemetery. j (iv) The Setting-up of the I;emetery Board. / (v) Rules and Regulations. ~ (vi) The laying out, boundaries, plans, registers and maintenance of the r;emetery, and extensions to the Cemetery.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Christchurch Update
    Future Christchurch Update The voice of the Canterbury rebuild MAY 2016 Regenerate Christchurch board announced Page 3 Exciting time for Sumner Pages 6–7 SCIRT – rebuilding stronger and better Pages 8–9 Pacific women celebrating post-quake identity Page 14 Words designed to reflect the feelings of the people of Christchurch now adorn this 100-metre-long wall in the central city as part of this year’s SPECTRUM Festival. Street art for the people of Christchurch I always knew you would come back. Local writer Hannah Herchenbach came up with the They were painted on a prominent wall in the South phrase, I always knew you would come back. Frame by international street artist Elliott Routledge, These are the words that took out the recent WORD aka Numskull (pictured above). UP competition to find a phrase that captured the way Festival Director George Shaw says the words Christchurch people feel about their city. describe the personal journey that resonates with More details on page 15. many Christchurch people. WORD UP formed part of the finale of the third annual SPECTRUM street art festival in central Christchurch. Future Christchurch Update May 2016 CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL Karleen Edwards Inside: Christchurch City Council Chief Executive Officer 3 New regeneration leaders announced This month we experienced organisations which will have such an and development of much-loved a significant development in impact on our city’s rejuvenation. I am community facilities such as the 4–5 Christchurch City Christchurch’s rebuild journey. confident that in working alongside new Aranui-Wainoni Community Council facilities Regenerate Christchurch and Ōtākaro Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 March 2013
    COMMUNITY, RECREATION AND CULTURE COMMITTEE AGENDA TUESDAY 5 MARCH 2013 AT 9AM IN COMMITTEE ROOM 1, CIVIC OFFICES, 53 HEREFORD STREET Committee: Councillor Yani Johanson (Chairperson), Councillors Peter Beck, Helen Broughton, Tim Carter, Barry Corbett, Jimmy Chen, Jamie Gough, and Glenn Livingstone (Deputy Chairperson). General Manager General Manager – General Manager Strategy and Planning Public Affairs Community Services Committee Adviser Mike Theelen Lydia Aydon Michael Aitken Lucy Halsall Tel: 941-8281 Tel: 941- 8982 Tel: 941-8607 Tel: 941-6227 PART A - MATTERS REQUIRING A COUNCIL DECISION PART B - REPORTS FOR INFORMATION PART C - DELEGATED DECISIONS INDEX ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. PART C 1. APOLOGIES 1 PART A 2. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 1 PART A 3. FACILITIES REBUILD PLAN – MONTHLY UPDATE REPORT INCLUDING TOP 30 3 PROJECTS STATUS UPDATE PART A 4. CENTRAL CITY HERITAGE LANDMARK GRANTS POLICY AND OPERATIONAL 47 GUIDELINES PART A 5. CENTRAL CITY HERITAGE LANDMARK GRANTS – RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 61 2012/2013 PART C 6. HERITAGE GRANT APPROVAL, ST LUKES, 1280 CHORLTON ROAD, LITTLE 81 AKALOA PART A 7. HERITAGE GRANT APPROVAL, ST PAUL’S, 1 HAREWOOD ROAD, PAPANUI, 87 CHRISTCHURCH PART A 8. CREATIVE INDUSTRIES SUPPORT FUND - FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS 95 PART A 9. FANFARE – A GATEWAY SCULPTURE FOR CHRISTCHURCH 165 PART A 10. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 175 CONTINUED OVER … ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE NO. NO. PART C 11. REPORT FROM CHAIRPERSON OF THE COMMUNITY, RECREATION AND CULTURE 193 COMMITTEE – ESTABLISHMENT OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKING PARTY PART A 12. SCARBOROUGH PADDLING POOL 195 1 COMMUNITY, RECREATION AND CULTURE COMMITTEE 5. 3. 2013 1. APOLOGIES Nil. 2. DEPUTATIONS BY APPOINTMENT 2 3 COMMUNITY, RECREATION AND CULTURE COMMITTEE 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Gathering Place
    Our gathering place Proudly managed by ASM Global Nau mai haere mai ki Te Pae Ōtautahi Welcome to Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre View from Victoria Square – Architectural Render Welcome to Te Pae Christchurch The South Island Christchurch City Located in the middle of the South A vibrant, walkable city centre Island, home to New Zealand’s most showcasing innovation and urban beautiful scenery and experiences. regeneration. River Promenade Location Architectural Collaboration Looking out over the Ōtākaro A beautifully designed building using Avon River promenade, right in natural materials and reflecting the the heart of Christchurch CBD. braided rivers of our landscape. Flexible Spaces Global Expertise Designed to adapt to your event Experienced management by ASM requirements, from international Global – our team are dedicated to conferences to bespoke gatherings. the success of your event. View from Oxford Terrace – Architectural Render OUR STORY Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre is the city’s gathering place – an architectural and social landmark designed as a welcoming heart in the centre of Christchurch. Opening in 2021, Te Pae Christchurch Convention Centre will become a showcase of the very best of Canterbury and the wider South Island. From rich and authentic food and cultural offerings, to seamless hosting and flawless technology, our focus is on providing our guests with the opportunity to share knowledge, make connections and enjoy a genuine and enriching experience in a world class environment. Te Pae Christchurch at night – Architectural Render Te ūnga, ko Aotearoa Destination New Zealand Introduction Destination New Zealand New Zealand Destination The South Island Getting Here Te Pae Christchurch Venue Spaces Explore Christchurch City of Innovation About Us 5 Lake Gunn, Fiordland NEW ZEALAND Aotearoa New Zealand is a country rich in culture and Aotearoa, the Land of the stunning natural landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of Posttensioned Seismic Retrofit of Two Stone Masonry Buildings During the Canterbury Earthquakes
    Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2013 Conference, Nov 15-17 2013, Hobart, Tasmania Performance of posttensioned seismic retrofit of two stone masonry buildings during the Canterbury earthquakes Dmytro Dizhur1, Sara Bailey2, John Trowsdale3, Michael Griffith4 and Jason M. Ingham5 1. Research Fellow, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand, [email protected] 2. Student Researcher, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand, [email protected] 3. Arts Centre Project Director, Holmes Consulting Group, P O Box 6718, Christchurch 8442, New Zealand, [email protected] 4. Professor, School of Civil, Environmental and Mining Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia, [email protected] 5. Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand, [email protected] Abstract Seismic retrofitting of unreinforced masonry buildings using posttensioning has been the topic of many recent experimental research projects. However, the performance of such retrofit designs in actual design level earthquakes has previously been poorly documented. In 1984 two stone masonry buildings within The Arts Centre of Christchurch received posttensioned seismic retrofits, which were subsequently subjected to design level seismic loads during the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence. These 26 year old retrofits were part of a global scheme to strengthen and secure the historic building complex and were subject to considerable budgetary constraints. Given the limited resources available at the time of construction and the current degraded state of the steel posttension tendons, the posttensioned retrofits performed well in preventing major damage to the overall structure of the two buildings in the Canterbury earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Experiments Middle-Class, Professional Families in Australia and New Zealand C
    Family Experiments Middle-class, professional families in Australia and New Zealand c. 1880–1920 Family Experiments Middle-class, professional families in Australia and New Zealand c. 1880–1920 SHELLEY RICHARDSON Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Creator: Richardson, Shelley, author. Title: Family experiments : middle-class, professional families in Australia and New Zealand c 1880–1920 / Shelley Richardson. ISBN: 9781760460587 (paperback) 9781760460594 (ebook) Series: ANU lives series in biography. Subjects: Middle class families--Australia--Biography. Middle class families--New Zealand--Biography. Immigrant families--Australia--Biography. Immigrant families--New Zealand--Biography. Dewey Number: 306.85092 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. The ANU.Lives Series in Biography is an initiative of the National Centre of Biography at The Australian National University, ncb.anu.edu.au. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Photograph adapted from: flic.kr/p/fkMKbm by Blue Mountains Local Studies. This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents List of Illustrations . vii List of Abbreviations . ix Acknowledgements . xi Introduction . 1 Section One: Departures 1 . The Family and Mid-Victorian Idealism . 39 2 . The Family and Mid-Victorian Realities . 67 Section Two: Arrival and Establishment 3 . The Academic Evangelists . 93 4 . The Lawyers . 143 Section Three: Marriage and Aspirations: Colonial Families 5 .
    [Show full text]
  • Shooting Star: a Biography of a Bicycle
    SHOOTING STAR: A BIOGRAPHY OF A BICYCLE Geoff Mentzer 2 SHOOTING STAR: A BIOGRAPHY OF A BICYCLE Copyright © 2020 by Geoff Mentzer All rights reserved. 3 In a scientific study of various living species and machines, the most efficient at locomotion – that is, the least amount of energy expended to move a kilometre – was found to be a man on a bicycle. –SS Wilson, Scientific American, March 1973, Volume 228, Issue 3, 90 The Dandy Horse of 1818, said to be the first velocipede man-motor carriage. Sharp, Bicycles & Tricycles: An Elementary Treatise On Their Design And Construction, Longmans, Green, and Co, London, New York and Bombay, 1896, 147 4 INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS What began as a brief biograph of the author's forebear Walter William Curties soon doubled into a study of two men, and expanded into an account of early bicycle – and a little motoring – history in New Zealand. Curties is mostly invisible to history, while Frederick Nelson Adams – who rose to national pre-eminence in motoring circles – by his reticence and reluctance for public exposure is also largely overlooked. Pioneering New Zealand cycling and motoring history – commercial, industrial and social – have been variously covered elsewhere, in cursory to comprehensive chronicles. Sadly, factual errors that persist are proof of copy and paste research. As examples, neither Nicky Oates nor Frederick Adams' brother Harry was the first person convicted in New Zealand for a motoring offence, nor was the world's first bicycle brass band formed in New Zealand. It must be said, however, that today we have one great advantage, ie Papers Past, that progeny of the Turnbull Library in Wellington.
    [Show full text]