THE HISTORY of BAROQUE STYLE Content
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
1. Compare and Contrast the High Renaissance Period with the Baroque Period
Preliminary Handout: David and Goliath Summarize the story of David and Goliath: How is David significant in Medici Florence? High Renaissance Period The Baroque Period Dates of the period: Dates of the period: Locations: Locations: Influences on the period: Influences on the period: Stylistic Characteristics: Stylistic Characteristics: Compare Donatello's David, Michelangelo's David, and Bernini’s David Donatello's David Michelangelo's David Bernini’s David Date Period Material Height Nude? Contrapposto? Moment in story: David represents... Original location: Stylistic Characteristics: Short Answer Essays: Please write a concise paragraph essay answering each of the questions below. You will work in groups and do a short two-minute presentation to the class on one question. 1. Compare and contrast the High Renaissance period with the Baroque period. What are the important influences and stylistic differences? 2. What are the primary defining elements of Italian Baroque sculpture and architecture? Select one Baroque sculpture and one Baroque building in Italy and discuss how they exemplify the style. 3. Compare and contrast Donatello, Michelangelo, and Bernini's David. How does each work embody the stylistic principles of its age? 4. Describe Bernini's Apollo and Daphne. What moment does it depict in Ovid's myth? Why would the Church approve of such a work? 5. How has Bernini drawn from his knowledge of theater, writing plays, and producing stage designs to create an emotionally dramatic experience for worshipers that involve architecture, sculpture, and painting at the Cornaro chapel? 6. How is Gianlorenzo Bernini’s work typical of the Baroque period? Give several examples of his work that support your answer. -
The Distinctiveness of Bohemian Baroque: a Study in the Architecture of Central Europe, C.1680-C.1720
artificialhorizon.org The distinctiveness of Bohemian baroque: a study in the architecture of Central Europe, c.1680-c.1720 RALPH HARRINGTON Between the late seventeenth century and the first years of the eighteenth the architecture of Bohemia underwent a marked transformation as the Italian influences that had been dominant until around 1690 gave way before Southern German and Austrian influences. In 1680 there were 28 architects of Italian origin working in Prague, compared with seven recorded as coming from northern Europe.1 The rapidity with which German influence displaced Italian can be gauged from the fact that by the later 1690s the proportions were reversed, largely as a result of the great immigration of architects, particularly from southern Germany, which took place from 1690 to 1700. This influx of talent ensured that, despite long-established Italian architectural dominance, the great flowering of the Austrian baroque which took place in the 1680s had rapid repercussions in Bohemia, where its influence interacted with local influences to produce a style of architecture altogether distinct from that prevalent in Austria itself. The first phase of the Austrian baroque had itself been dependent on Italian artists, and a large number of architects, sculptors and decorators originating in Italy made vital contributions to the development of the style known as ‘Imperial Baroque’. This Austrian imperial architectural style, dynamic in its manipulation of volumes and planes, grandiloquent in detail but massively authoritarian in overall character, had reached its fullest expression around 1700, finding its greatest exponents in two Italian-trained native architects, Johann Fischer von Erlach (1656- 1723) and Lucas von Hildebrandt (1688-1745). -
Riegl, Alois. the Origins of Baroque Art in Rome. Ed. and Trans. Andrew Hopkins and Arnold Witte
296 book reviews Riegl, Alois. The Origins of Baroque Art in Rome. Ed. and trans. Andrew Hopkins and Arnold Witte. Texts and Documents. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute, 2010. Pp. x, 279. ISBN 978-1-60606-041-4 (paperback) $50. The translation into English of Alois Riegl’s final book, Die Entstehung der Barockkunst in Rom, is certain to be embraced with enthusiasm by specialists and students of art history and the Baroque alike. Those familiar with Riegl’s work in the field of Baroque studies will appreciate the renewed attention given to this important text while English-speaking newcomers will no doubt welcome the opportunity to access the late ideas of this pioneer of the Vienna School. Riegl is of course best known for his influential theory of Kunstwollen, first projected in his groundbreaking Stilfragen of 1893. Yet in The Origins of Baroque Art in Rome this theoretical concern is largely set aside in order to privilege discussion of singular works. To some extent this may be attributed to the fact that the text, first published posthumously in 1908, derives from the incomplete lecture notes compiled by Riegl during his tenure at the University of Vienna. The emphasis here is on example and though the book seeks to adumbrate the stylistic changes that took place in Italian art between 1520 and 1610 it does so principally through the close formal analysis of select works, many of which will surprise by their appearance in a discussion on Baroque art. For in Riegl’s view the Italian Baroque finds its earliest expression not in the familiar late sixteenth-century paintings of the Bolognese school or the Roman works of Maderno and Caravaggio but in the shifting styles of the mature artists of the Renaissance including Michelangelo and Correggio. -
Flesh As Relic: Painting Early Christian Female Martyrs Within
FLESH AS RELIC: PAINTING EARLY CHRISTIAN FEMALE MARTYRS WITHIN BAROQUE SACRED SPACES by Stormy Lee DuBois A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Art in Art History MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana November 2019 ©COPYRIGHT by Stormy Lee DuBois 2019 All Rights Reserved ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to offer my sincerest gratitude to my committee, Dr. Todd Larkin, Dr. Regina Gee, and Dr. Melissa Ragain, for supporting me throughout my coursework at Montana State University and facilitating both graduate research and pedagogical inspiration during the study abroad program in Italy. I would also like to thank School of Art Director, Vaughan Judge for his continued support of art historical research and for the opportunities the program has afforded me. My thanks also go my husband, Josh Lever for his love and support. Thanks are also in order to Dani Huvaere for reading every draft and considering every possibility. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 2. BAROQUE PAINTING CONVENTIONS: STYLISTIC INTERPRETATIONS OF TRIDENTINE REQUIREMENTS FOR RELIGIOUS ART ............................................................................................... 4 Baroque Classicism and Naturalism ............................................................................. 4 Burial of Saint Lucy.................................................................................................. -
Baroque Architecture
'"" ^ 'J^. rfCur'. Fig. I. — Venice. S. Maria della Salute. (See pp. 88-90.) BAROQUE ARCHITECTURE BY MARTIN SHAW BRIGGS A.K.I. B. A. " iAulhor of " In the Heel of Italy WITH 109 ILLUSTRATIONS NEW YORK ; ' McBRIDE, NAST & COMPANY ^ y 1914 ,iMvMV NA (^Ay n^/i/j reserved) In all ages there have been some excellent workmen, and some excellent work done.—Walter Pater. PREFACE is commonly supposed that the purpose of a preface is to IT explain the scope of a book to those who do not read so far as the first page. There is a touch of cynicism in such an opinion which makes one loth to accept it, but I prefer to meet my troubles half way by stating at the outset what I have emphasized in my last chapter—that this book is not in any way an attempt to create a wholesale revival of Baroque Architecture in England. It is simply a history of a complex and neglected period, and has been prepared in the uncertain intervals of an architectural practice. The difficulty of the work has been increased by the fact that the subject has never been dealt with as a whole in any language previously. Gurlitt in his Geschichte des Barockstiles, published in 1887, covered a considerable part of the ground, but his work is very scarce and expensive. To students his volumes may be recommended for their numerous plans, but for details and general views they are less valuable. In recent years several fine mono- graphs have appeared dealing with Baroque buildings in specific districts, and very recently in a new international series the principal buildings of the period in Germany and Italy have been illustrated. -
Chapter 14.Key
Chapter 14: The Seventeenth Century: The Baroque Era Culture and Values, 8th Ed. Cunningham and Reich and Fichner-Rathus Identify the major features of the Baroque period The Counter-Reformation Spirit ■ Council of Trent (1545-1563) ■ Redefined doctrines, reaffirmed dogmas ■ Assertion of discipline, education ■ New artistic demands, purpose ■ Society of Jesus, Jesuits ■ Ignatius Loyola (1491-1556) ■ Missionaries, educational improvement Seventeenth-Century Baroque ■ Decentralized styles ■ Art for the middle-class ■ Rich, ornate, elaborate, fanciful ■ Emotionalism ■ Psychological exploration ■ New techniques, virtuosity Baroque Style • grand size or spectacular – to impress • elaborate ornamentation (or metaphors) – sometimes called “conceits” in literature and drama • dramatic use of light in painting • illusionism • intense emotion – affections in music List the major features and figures in Baroque art and architecture in Italy 14.4 Saint Peter’s façade, Rome, Italy ! smart history link The Baroque Period in Italy Baroque Sculpture and Architecture in Rome Gian Lorenzo Bernini (1598-1680) ■ Chief architect of Counter-Reformation ■ Fountains, palaces, churches ■ Conflict with Borromini ■ Religious-themed sculptures ■ Baldacchino ■ David (1623) ■ The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa (1645-1652) 14.6 Gian Lorenzo Bernini, Baldacchino, 1624-1633 ! smart history link 14.7 Gian Lorenzo Bernini, David, 1623 ! smart history link Art in the Baroque Italy Bernini’s David Michelangelo’s David note the “action”; intense emotion seems calm, in repose, relaxed 14.8 Gian Lorenzo Bernini, The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa, Cornaro Chapel, Santa Maria della Vittoria, Rome, Italy smart history link The Baroque Period in Italy Painting in Rome Caravaggio (1573-1610) ■ Dramatic naturalism, realism ■ Brutal, pessimistic ■ Emotional, psychological ■ Tenebrism ■ The Calling of St. -
The Crisis in the Arts of the Seventeenth Century: a Crisis Of
Journal of Interdisciplinary History, xl:2 (Autumn, 2009), 239–261. CRISIS IN THE ARTS Peter Burke The Crisis in the Arts of the Seventeenth Century: A Crisis of Representation? Because the term crisis in general and the idea of a seventeenth-century crisis in particular have been the objects of acute criticism, a formal deªnition is in order. One might speak, for instance, of a “crisis of conªdence”— in other words, a decline. However, conªdence is not easy to measure, and, in any case, it is necessary to ask, “Conªdence in what” (church, state, or humanity)? In the context of witch trials, discussed in this issue by Edward Bever, the phrase “crisis of con- ªdence” is a precise one, but it becomes vaguer when it is used about the arts. To avoid such a problem, the deªnition of crisis employed herein is a fairly precise one, close to the medical origins of the term in ancient Greece, where it referred to the moment in an illness when a patient was poised between death and recovery, or to seventeenth-century usage, exempliªed by a speech in the House of Commons in 1627 by Sir Benjamin Rudyerd about the “crisis of parliaments” that would determine whether the Parlia- ment would “live or die.” Burckhardt, perhaps the ªrst historian to make a serious use of the term, also used the metaphor of a fever.1 The pathological overtones of this metaphor, however, are an obstacle to understanding, and in what follows an attempt will be Peter Burke is Emeritus Professor of Cultural History and Life Fellow of Emmanuel College, University of Cambridge. -
Bernini Struts
Part II Material and Social Transformations 3 Bernini Struts Michael Cole Few works in the history of sculpture are more admired for the sheer skill of their carving than Gianlorenzo Bernini’s Apollo and Daphne (figure 3.1). Charles Avery counts it among the pieces that established Bernini as ‘‘the greatest sculptor in the world.’’1 Peter Rockwell maintains that ‘‘any sculptor who looks at Bernini’s Apollo and Daphne can only come away astonished.’’2 And Howard Hibbard concludes his discussion of the statue by suggesting that it is too dazzling, showing ‘‘a quality of immature excess, of virtuosity for its own sake.’’3 The Apollo and Daphne has come to stand as the perfect antithesis to the modernist principle of ‘‘truth to materials,’’ the ultimate illustration of the artist defying his medium’s very nature. Indeed, it has become difficult, in view of the Apollo and Daphne, to imagine what Bernini could not make marble do. No wonder Jennifer Montagu caused a small sensation when she argued that its most famous features were executed by Bernini’s gifted assistant Giuliano Finelli rather than by the master himself.4 Bernini began the Apollo and Daphne in 1622 and had largely completed it by 1624, the last year of his employment with Cardinal Scipione Borghese. Roughly contemporary with the sculptor’s David (1623–4) and still standing in the building for which it was made, it represents the culmination of a series of works that, as Rudolf Preimesberger sug- gested in a classic article, ask to be measured collectively against a sixteenth-century, largely Florentine, tradition.5 The Apollo and Daphne and the other statues Bernini made for the Cardinal were collectors’ pieces, appealing explicitly to a cultivated audience with a historical sensibility and a keen awareness of sculptural practice. -
Bernini's 'Animas' Were Originally Meant to Be Mythological, Not Religious, Sculptures 19 February 2016
Bernini's 'Animas' were originally meant to be mythological, not religious, sculptures 19 February 2016 of a Christian soul's personification enjoying the pleasures of the Heaven or tormented by the punishment received in Hell (as believed until now), but they really are mythologically themed sculptures: a nymph and a satyr, respectively. This revelation came from David García Cueto, Arts History professor at the University of Granada (UGR), in an article published in the renowned Sculpture Journal magazine, belonging to the University of Liverpool (United Kingdom). In his article, García Cueto comes to this astonishing conclusion about these two renowned sculptures that can be seen at the Spanish Embassy in front of the Holy See (Rome). García Cueto has propossed that the 'Animas' are mythologically themed sculptures based on unpublished documents of that time coming from the Archivio Storico Capitolino (the Roman Historical Archives) in Rome. "This revelation opens the way to a new interpretation of his work, absent in Bernini's huge historiography until now", the researcher stresses. Bernini's 'Anima dannata', kept at the Spanish Embassy The first conclusions of this research were in front of the Holy See. Credit: Credit: CAROLINA published in February 2015 in a conference held at MARCONI Museo Nacional del Prado (Madrid, Spain) on the occasion of the exhibition 'Bernini, Roma y la Monarquía Hispánica, siglos XVI-XVIII' David García Cueto, Arts History professor at the (HAR2014-52061-P) [Bernini, Rome and the University of Granada, affirms that these two Spanish Monarchy, XVI-XVIII centuries]. marble heads are not a representation of a Christian soul's personification enjoying the Gian Lorenzo Bernini (1598-1680) was an Italian pleasures of the Heaven or tormented by the sculptor, architect and painter. -
Italian Baroque Sculpture Free
FREE ITALIAN BAROQUE SCULPTURE PDF Bruce Boucher | 224 pages | 02 Mar 1998 | Thames & Hudson Ltd | 9780500203071 | English | London, United Kingdom Italian Baroque Artists Baroque Italian Baroque Sculpture is associated with the Baroque cultural movement in 17th century Europe. In Baroque sculpture, groups of figures assumed new importance, and there was a dynamic movement and energy of human Italian Baroque Sculpture spiraled around an empty central vortex or reached outwards into the surrounding space. A great deal of Baroque sculpture added extra-sculptural elements; for example, concealed lighting, water fountains, or fused sculpture and architecture that created a transformative experience for the viewer. Artists saw themselves as working in the classical tradition and admired Hellenistic and later Roman sculpture. Gian Lorenzo Bernini was the dominating figure of the age. The Ecstasy of St. Theresa in the Cornaro Chapel, Santa Maria della Vittoriaand the now-hidden Constantine at the base of the Scala Regia which he designed were among his best known works. Ecstasy of St. Theresa by Bernini : Bernini was the most prominent sculptor of the Baroque period. Inat the height of his fame, Bernini traveled to Paris for several months in response to repeated requests for his works by King Louis XIV. His international popularity was such that the streets were lined with admiring crowds during his walks in the city. Here, Bernini presented some designs for the east front of the Louvre, which were ultimately rejected. He soon lost favor at the French court as he praised the art Italian Baroque Sculpture architecture of Italy over that of France. -
Chapter 10—The Counter- Reformation and the Baroque
Chapter 10—The Counter- Reformation and the Baroque The Baroque World Barroco (Portuguese for irregular shaped pearl) • 16th century influenced by the Reformation and the 17th century by the Counter-Reformation (1600-1715) —the Counter-Reformation reestablished discipline of the church and an attempt to do so with art. • Council of Trent: dealt with transubstantiation, purgatory, apostolic succession, celibacy, etc. • Jesuits became the enforcers of the Counter- Reformation. • Completion of St. Peter’s first major Baroque architecture • Decentralization of power in both the church and the arts. • Reformation and the rise of the national state. • Art for the more than just the church (aristocracy and bourgeoisie) • Science: Galileo, Bacon, Kepler, Descartes, Newton • Time of absolutism in church and state Bernini Saint Peter’s Square 1656-57 The Baroque Art/Mannerism Characteristics: • Emotionalism and psychology • Anti-rationalistic classicism of Renaissance • Illusionism • Splendor • Light and Shadow (chiaroscuro) • Movement (note diagonal line) • Religious Fervor • Domestic Intimacy The RCC had a couple major problems: • The Protestant Reformation • The fight between Charles V of Spain and Francis I of France • Therefore, the two emperors got the pope to create the Council of Trent (1545-1563) so that the RCC could reform itself and deal with the Protestants. The Council of Trent did several things: Stopped selling offices and religious items Moved many bishops to their respective churches Remain celibate Create seminaries in each diocese Pushed art—pictures, statues, music, etc. The Rise of Mannerism Michelangelo was the bridge from the Renaissance to Mannerism. Here Michelangelo's Victory has a small head with a massive body. -
The Annals of UVAN, Vol. I, Fall, 1951, No. 2
WESTERN EUROPE AND THE UKRAINIAN BAROQUE AN ASPECT OF CULTURAL INFLUENCES AT THE TIME OF HETMAN IVAN MAZEPA OLEKSANDER OHLOBLYN Ukrainian Baroque architecture of Mazepa’s period has been ex tensively studied. Although outstanding monographs are lacking, numerous works by such Ukrainian scholars as H. Pavluckyj, K. Šyrockyj, F. Ernst, D. Antonovyč, V. Zaloziećkyj, and V. Sicynśkyj have established the main features of this architecture, have shown both Ukrainian and European origins of it, and have made some studies of individual monuments. The place of this “Cossack-Het- man” architecture in the history of art, together with its genesis and development, has been clearly defined. Hence a kind of scholarly canon has been set up, and all further work in this field conforms carefully to it, only elaborating details of the main outline. Prac tically no attempt has been made to return again to the source ma terial, in part because almost all the monuments of the Ukrainian Baroque period have been destroyed, and little interest is shown in new methods of research into what has become familiar. However, the latest researches into the times of Mazepa have raised many new problems in the fields of history and culture, and especially in architecture. The modern historian of that period is now attracted not only to further exploration of the different trends within the Ukrainian culture, but primarily to the elucida tion of the reciprocal cultural influences between Western Europe and the Ukraine. This new interest has not, as yet, led to any special comparative studies and has been somewhat hampered by the inaccessibility of the sources.