DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy and Entropy in Quantum Field Theories by Adam Levine A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy and Entropy in Quantum Field Theories by Adam Levine A Energy and Entropy in Quantum Field Theories by Adam Levine A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Raphael Bousso, Chair Professor Richard Borcherds Professor Yasunori Nomura Summer 2019 Energy and Entropy in Quantum Field Theories Copyright 2019 by Adam Levine 1 Abstract Energy and Entropy in Quantum Field Theories by Adam Levine Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Raphael Bousso, Chair Energy conditions play an important role in constraining the dynamics of quantum field theories as well as gravitational theories. For example, in semi-classical gravity, the achronal averaged null energy condition (AANEC) can be used to prove that it is always slower to traverse through a wormhole than to travel around via its exterior. Such conditions prevent causality violations that would lead to paradoxes. Recent advances have been made in proving previously conjectured energy conditions directly in quantum field theory (QFT) as well as in uncovering new ones. This thesis will be an exploration of various energy inequalities in conformal field the- ories (CFTs) as well as semi-classical quantum gravity. At the core of this work lies the recently proved quantum null energy condition (QNEC). The QNEC bounds the null energy flowing past a point by a certain second shape derivative of entanglement entropy. We will demonstrate that the QNEC represents a deep connection between causality, energy and entanglement in quantum field theories. We explore this connection first in the context of holographic CFTs. Calculations in holographic theories will lead us to conjecture that the so-called diagonal QNEC is saturated in all interacting QFTs. We will then provide further, independent evidence that this conjecture holds for all CFTs with a twist gap by explicitly calculating shape derivatives of entanglement entropy using defect CFT techniques. i To my grandfathers, Bob and Lenny, who I know would have enjoyed learning about quantum entanglement. To Paul and Barbara O'Rourke. ii Contents Contents ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Energy conditions in gravity and quantum field theory . 2 1.2 Quantum Focussing and the Quantum Null Energy Condition . 3 1.3 Energy and Entanglement . 5 1.4 Outline . 7 2 Upper and Lower Bounds on the Integrated Null Energy in Gravity 8 2.1 Introduction and Summary . 8 2.2 Review of Induced Gravity on the Brane . 10 2.3 Lower Bound from Brane Causality . 14 2.4 Upper Bound From Achronality . 16 2.5 Applications . 17 2.6 Discussion and Future Directions . 19 3 Geometric Constraints from Subregion Duality 20 3.1 Introduction . 20 3.2 Glossary . 23 3.3 Relationships Between Entropy and Energy Inequalities . 30 3.4 Relationships Between Entropy and Energy Inequalities and Geometric Con- straints . 31 3.5 Discussion . 41 4 Local Modular Hamiltonians from the Quantum Null Energy Condition 44 4.1 Introduction and Summary . 44 4.2 Main Argument . 46 4.3 Holographic Calculation . 49 4.4 Discussion . 51 5 The Quantum Null Energy Condition, Entanglement Wedge Nesting, and Quantum Focusing 54 iii 5.1 Entanglement Wedge Nesting . 56 5.2 Connection to Quantum Focusing . 65 5.3 Discussion . 72 6 Energy Density from Second Shape Variations of the von Neumann En- tropy 76 6.1 Introduction . 76 6.2 Setup and Conventions . 79 6.3 Null Deformations and Perturbative Geometry . 85 6.4 Non-Perturbative Bulk Geometry . 88 6.5 Non-Null Deformations . 94 6.6 Discussion . 97 7 Entropy Variations and Light Ray Operators from Replica Defects 101 7.1 Introduction . 101 7.2 Replica Trick and the Displacement Operator . 106 7.3 Towards saturation of the QNEC . 109 ^ 7.4 Contribution of T++ ............................... 111 7.5 Higher order variations of vacuum entanglement . 114 7.6 Near Vacuum States . 117 7.7 Discussion . 120 Bibliography 123 8 Appendix 134 A Notation and Definitions . 134 B Surface Variations . 138 C z-Expansions . 140 D Details of the EWN Calculations . 142 E The d = 4 Case . 144 F Connections to the ANEC . 147 G Free and Weakly-Interacting Theories . 150 H Modified Ward identity . 155 I Analytic Continuation of a Replica Three Point Function . 157 J Explicit Calculation of c(2) ............................ 162 K Explicit Calculation of γ(1) ............................ 164 L Calculating Fn .................................. 166 M Free Field Theories and Null Quantization . 168 iv Acknowledgments This work would have been impossible without the support and guidance of many people. Chief among them is my advisor, Raphael Bousso, who, despite not yet being my collabo- rator, has been extremely supportive of me in every aspect of this work. I could not have asked for a better advisor. I also benefited immensely from the patient guidance of and collaboration with Stefan Leichenauer. I'm not sure exactly what I would have done without him, but I know it would have been significantly worse. My collaboration with Tom Faulkner, which is detailed in the final chapter of this work, had a large impact on me. Working with Tom was a humbling and inspiring experience. I am extremely grateful for his patience with us graduate students at Berkeley, especially as our project wore on into its second year! I benefited from many influential conversations with Aron Wall, who taught me a ton throughout graduate school. I am also grateful to the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, where I spent a semester as a graduate fellow. While at KITP, I talked frequently with Don Marolf who was extremely supportive, patient and kind to me. To everyone at BCTP - Arvin, Chris, Ven, Illan, Pratik, Vincent, Jason, Zach, Mudassir - thanks for making these past few years so fun. I hope we will continue yelling at each other over physics for many years to come. This work benefited from the support of the Defense Department through the National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) fellowship. 1 Chapter 1 Introduction The past two decades of research into quantum gravity has seen a rapid convergence of techniques from quantum information, string theory and quantum field theory. Much of this research has been anchored on the fundamental result of Maldacena, who found the first concrete example of the so-called \holographic principle" in string theory [113]. The holographic principle predicts that the information content of gravitating systems - such as a black hole - can be encoded in a theory of one lower dimension [132, 84]. Maldacena found a precise realization of this principle in the so-called AdS/CFT duality, which equates string theory on anti- de Sitter space (AdS) in d + 1 spacetime dimensions with a special non-gravitational theory - a conformal field theory (CFT) - in d spacetime dimensions. Although AdS/CFT provided further evidence for the holographic principle, the idea of a holographic universe arose out of a famous formula, due originally to Jacob Bekenstein, stating that black holes have entropy which scales not with their space-time volume but rather their horizon area [11]. The relationship between entropy and horizon area precisely takes the form Ahorizon SBH = (1.0.1) 4G~ d−2 where G~ = `Planck is the Planck area for a spacetime of dimension d. Although this fundamental formula was originally conjectured using simple thought ex- periments in the 1970s, it was not given a precise, UV realization until 2006, when Ryu & Takayanagi first found that the entropy for some sub-region R in a holographic CFT is in fact given by the area over 4G~ of a specific surface in the dual AdS spacetime [126, 125]. This co-dimension 2 surface, now called the Ryu-Takayanagi (RT) surface, is found by extremizing over all surfaces anchored and homologous to the boundary region R. This result opened the floodgates for research examining the connection between geom- etry and entanglement. To cherry pick a few important examples, Mark van Raamsdonk's work in [121] suggested that space-time connectivity should be related to entanglement. Fur- thermore, the work of Maldacena and Susskind conjectured that [112] entanglement between CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 2 the exterior and interior Hawking modes of an evaporating black hole should holographically generate a geometric, wormhole-like connection. These fascinating ideas together with Ein- stein's equations suggest that if geometry (and therefore spacetime curvature) are related to entanglement there should be a corresponding connection between entanglement and energy density. This latter connection will be the main the subject of this thesis. 1.1 Energy conditions in gravity and quantum field theory To understand the various connections between energy and entanglement, it is instructive to first review various constraints on energy in both semi-classical quantum gravity and quantum field theory. Einstein's equations can always be solved trivially given a metric by computing the Einstein tensor and then declaring that this gives you the stress tensor. Of course, such a procedure for solving Einstein's equations does not tell you whether the solution is physical. For this question, one must consult energy conditions, which constrain the source term in Einstein's equations. In classical gravity, the weakest energy condition which is manifestly true is the null energy condition (NEC). The NEC states that at every point in the spacetime Tkk(x) ≥ 0 (1.1.1) a where k is a null vector in the tangent space at x and where Tµν is the stress tensor of the field theory coupled to gravity. For example, in free, scalar field theory, the null-null component of the stress tensor is Tkk ∼ rkφrkφ (1.1.2) which is manifestly positive. In quantum field theory, this positivity can break due to quantum fluctuations. The canonical example of such a NEC-violating state is the Casimir vacuum.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Quantum Focussing Conjecture Arxiv:1506.02669V1 [Hep-Th]
    Prepared for submission to JHEP A Quantum Focussing Conjecture Raphael Bousso,a;b Zachary Fisher,a;b Stefan Leichenauer,a;b and Aron C. Wallc aCenter for Theoretical Physics and Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. bLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A. cInstitute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA Abstract: We propose a universal inequality that unifies the Bousso bound with the classical focussing theorem. Given a surface σ that need not lie on a horizon, we define a finite generalized entropy Sgen as the area of σ in Planck units, plus the von Neumann entropy of its exterior. Given a null congruence N orthogonal to σ, the rate of change of Sgen per unit area defines a quantum expansion. We conjecture that the quantum expansion cannot increase along N. This extends the notion of universal focussing to cases where quantum matter may violate the null energy condition. Integrating the conjecture yields a precise version of the Strominger-Thompson Quantum Bousso Bound. Applied to locally parallel light-rays, the conjecture implies a Quantum Null Energy Condition: a lower bound on the stress tensor in terms of the second derivative of the von Neumann entropy. We sketch a proof of this novel relation in quantum field theory. arXiv:1506.02669v1 [hep-th] 8 Jun 2015 Contents 1 Introduction2 2 Classical Focussing and Bousso Bound5 2.1 Classical Expansion5 2.2 Classical Focussing Theorem6 2.3 Bousso Bound7 3 Quantum Expansion and Focussing Conjecture8 3.1 Generalized Entropy
    [Show full text]
  • The Penrose and Hawking Singularity Theorems Revisited
    Classical singularity thms. Interlude: Low regularity in GR Low regularity singularity thms. Proofs Outlook The Penrose and Hawking Singularity Theorems revisited Roland Steinbauer Faculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna Prague, October 2016 The Penrose and Hawking Singularity Theorems revisited 1 / 27 Classical singularity thms. Interlude: Low regularity in GR Low regularity singularity thms. Proofs Outlook Overview Long-term project on Lorentzian geometry and general relativity with metrics of low regularity jointly with `theoretical branch' (Vienna & U.K.): Melanie Graf, James Grant, G¨untherH¨ormann,Mike Kunzinger, Clemens S¨amann,James Vickers `exact solutions branch' (Vienna & Prague): Jiˇr´ıPodolsk´y,Clemens S¨amann,Robert Svarcˇ The Penrose and Hawking Singularity Theorems revisited 2 / 27 Classical singularity thms. Interlude: Low regularity in GR Low regularity singularity thms. Proofs Outlook Contents 1 The classical singularity theorems 2 Interlude: Low regularity in GR 3 The low regularity singularity theorems 4 Key issues of the proofs 5 Outlook The Penrose and Hawking Singularity Theorems revisited 3 / 27 Classical singularity thms. Interlude: Low regularity in GR Low regularity singularity thms. Proofs Outlook Table of Contents 1 The classical singularity theorems 2 Interlude: Low regularity in GR 3 The low regularity singularity theorems 4 Key issues of the proofs 5 Outlook The Penrose and Hawking Singularity Theorems revisited 4 / 27 Theorem (Pattern singularity theorem [Senovilla, 98]) In a spacetime the following are incompatible (i) Energy condition (iii) Initial or boundary condition (ii) Causality condition (iv) Causal geodesic completeness (iii) initial condition ; causal geodesics start focussing (i) energy condition ; focussing goes on ; focal point (ii) causality condition ; no focal points way out: one causal geodesic has to be incomplete, i.e., : (iv) Classical singularity thms.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical and Semi-Classical Energy Conditions Arxiv:1702.05915V3 [Gr-Qc] 29 Mar 2017
    Classical and semi-classical energy conditions1 Prado Martin-Morunoa and Matt Visserb aDepartamento de F´ısica Te´orica I, Ciudad Universitaria, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain bSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington 6140, New Zealand E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: The standard energy conditions of classical general relativity are (mostly) linear in the stress-energy tensor, and have clear physical interpretations in terms of geodesic focussing, but suffer the significant drawback that they are often violated by semi-classical quantum effects. In contrast, it is possible to develop non-standard energy conditions that are intrinsically non-linear in the stress-energy tensor, and which exhibit much better well-controlled behaviour when semi-classical quantum effects are introduced, at the cost of a less direct applicability to geodesic focussing. In this chapter we will first review the standard energy conditions and their various limitations. (Including the connection to the Hawking{Ellis type I, II, III, and IV classification of stress-energy tensors). We shall then turn to the averaged, nonlinear, and semi-classical energy conditions, and see how much can be done once semi-classical quantum effects are included. arXiv:1702.05915v3 [gr-qc] 29 Mar 2017 1Draft chapter, on which the related chapter of the book Wormholes, Warp Drives and Energy Conditions (to be published by Springer) will be based. Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Standard energy conditions2 2.1 The Hawking{Ellis type I | type IV classification4 2.2 Alternative canonical form8 2.3 Limitations of the standard energy conditions9 3 Averaged energy conditions 11 4 Nonlinear energy conditions 12 5 Semi-classical energy conditions 14 6 Discussion 16 1 Introduction The energy conditions, be they classical, semiclassical, or \fully quantum" are at heart purely phenomenological approaches to deciding what form of stress-energy is to be considered \physically reasonable".
    [Show full text]
  • Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research Communication Studies, Department of Spring 4-12-2011 Secular Salvation: Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement Brent Yergensen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstuddiss Part of the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Yergensen, Brent, "Secular Salvation: Sacred Rhetorical Invention in the String Theory Movement" (2011). Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research. 6. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/commstuddiss/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication Studies, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Studies Theses, Dissertations, and Student Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. SECULAR SALVATION: SACRED RHETORICAL INVENTION IN THE STRING THEORY MOVEMENT by Brent Yergensen A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Major: Communication Studies Under the Supervision of Dr. Ronald Lee Lincoln, Nebraska April, 2011 ii SECULAR SALVATION: SACRED RHETORICAL INVENTION IN THE STRING THEORY MOVEMENT Brent Yergensen, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2011 Advisor: Ronald Lee String theory is argued by its proponents to be the Theory of Everything. It achieves this status in physics because it provides unification for contradictory laws of physics, namely quantum mechanics and general relativity. While based on advanced theoretical mathematics, its public discourse is growing in prevalence and its rhetorical power is leading to a scientific revolution, even among the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Rays, Singularities, and All That
    Light Rays, Singularities, and All That Edward Witten School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA Abstract This article is an introduction to causal properties of General Relativity. Topics include the Raychaudhuri equation, singularity theorems of Penrose and Hawking, the black hole area theorem, topological censorship, and the Gao-Wald theorem. The article is based on lectures at the 2018 summer program Prospects in Theoretical Physics at the Institute for Advanced Study, and also at the 2020 New Zealand Mathematical Research Institute summer school in Nelson, New Zealand. Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Causal Paths 4 3 Globally Hyperbolic Spacetimes 11 3.1 Definition . 11 3.2 Some Properties of Globally Hyperbolic Spacetimes . 15 3.3 More On Compactness . 18 3.4 Cauchy Horizons . 21 3.5 Causality Conditions . 23 3.6 Maximal Extensions . 24 4 Geodesics and Focal Points 25 4.1 The Riemannian Case . 25 4.2 Lorentz Signature Analog . 28 4.3 Raychaudhuri’s Equation . 31 4.4 Hawking’s Big Bang Singularity Theorem . 35 5 Null Geodesics and Penrose’s Theorem 37 5.1 Promptness . 37 5.2 Promptness And Focal Points . 40 5.3 More On The Boundary Of The Future . 46 1 5.4 The Null Raychaudhuri Equation . 47 5.5 Trapped Surfaces . 52 5.6 Penrose’s Theorem . 54 6 Black Holes 58 6.1 Cosmic Censorship . 58 6.2 The Black Hole Region . 60 6.3 The Horizon And Its Generators . 63 7 Some Additional Topics 66 7.1 Topological Censorship . 67 7.2 The Averaged Null Energy Condition .
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title General Properties of Landscapes: Vacuum Structure, Dynamics and Statistics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8392m6fc Author Zukowski, Claire Elizabeth Publication Date 2015 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California General Properties of Landscapes: Vacuum Structure, Dynamics and Statistics by Claire Elizabeth Zukowski A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Raphael Bousso, Chair Professor Lawrence J. Hall Professor David J. Aldous Summer 2015 General Properties of Landscapes: Vacuum Structure, Dynamics and Statistics Copyright 2015 by Claire Elizabeth Zukowski 1 Abstract General Properties of Landscapes: Vacuum Structure, Dynamics and Statistics by Claire Elizabeth Zukowski Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Professor Raphael Bousso, Chair Even the simplest extra-dimensional theory, when compactified, can lead to a vast and complex landscape. To make progress, it is useful to focus on generic features of landscapes and compactifications. In this work we will explore universal features and consequences of (i) vacuum structure, (ii) dynamics resulting from symmetry breaking, and (iii) statistical predictions for low-energy parameters and observations. First, we focus on deriving general properties of the vacuum structure of a theory independent of the details of the geometry. We refine the procedure for performing compactifications by proposing a general gauge- invariant method to obtain the full set of Kaluza-Klein towers of fields for any internal geometry. Next, we study dynamics in a toy model for flux compactifications.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Cover Inside (Print)
    CONTENTS - Continued PHYSICAL REVIEW D THIRD SERIES, VOLUME 57, NUMBER 4 15 FEBRUARY 1998 Recycling universe . 2230 Jaume Garriga and Alexander Vilenkin Cosmological particle production and generalized thermodynamic equilibrium . 2245 Winfried Zimdahl Spherical curvature inhomogeneities in string cosmology . 2255 John D. Barrow and Kerstin E. Kunze Strong-coupling behavior of ␾4 theories and critical exponents . 2264 Hagen Kleinert Hamiltonian spacetime dynamics with a spherical null-dust shell . 2279 Jorma Louko, Bernard F. Whiting, and John L. Friedman Black hole boundary conditions and coordinate conditions . 2299 Douglas M. Eardley Ampli®cation of gravitational waves in radiation-dominated universes: Relic gravitons in models with matter creation . ..................................... 2305 D. M. Tavares and M. R. de Garcia Maia Evolution equations for gravitating ideal ¯uid bodies in general relativity . 2317 Helmut Friedrich Five-brane instantons and R2 couplings in Nϭ4 string theory . 2323 Jeffrey A. Harvey and Gregory Moore Exact gravitational threshold correction in the Ferrara-Harvey-Strominger-Vafa model . 2329 Jeffrey A. Harvey and Gregory Moore Effective theories of coupled classical and quantum variables from decoherent histories: A new approach to the back reaction problem . 2337 J. J. Halliwell Quantization of black holes in the Wheeler-DeWitt approach . 2349 Thorsten Brotz Trace-anomaly-induced effective action for 2D and 4D dilaton coupled scalars . 2363 Shin'ichi Nojiri and Sergei D. Odintsov Models for chronology selection . 2372 M. J. Cassidy and S. W. Hawking S-wave sector of type IIB supergravity on S1ϫT4 ................................................... 2381 Youngjai Kiem, Chang-Yeong Lee, and Dahl Park Kerr spinning particle, strings, and superparticle models . 2392 A. Burinskii Stuffed black holes .
    [Show full text]
  • General Relativistic Energy Conditions: the Hubble Expansion in the Epoch of Galaxy Formation
    General Relativistic Energy Conditions: The Hubble expansion in the epoch of galaxy formation. Matt Visser† Physics Department Washington University Saint Louis Missouri 63130-4899 USA 26 May 1997; gr-qc/9705070 Abstract The energy conditions of Einstein gravity (classical general relativity) are designed to extract as much information as possible from classical general relativity without enforcing a particular equation of state for the stress-energy. This systematic avoidance of the need to specify a particular equation of state is particularly useful in a cosmological setting — since the equation of state for the cosmological fluid in a Friedmann–Robertson– Walker type universe is extremely uncertain. I shall show that the energy conditions provide simple and robust bounds on the behaviour of both the density and look-back time as a function of red-shift. I shall show that current observations suggest that the so-called strong energy condition (SEC) is violated sometime between the epoch of galaxy formation and the present. This implies that no possible combination of “normal” matter is capable of fitting the observational data. PACS: 98.80.-k; 98.80.Bp; 98.80.Hw; 04.90.+e † E-mail: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction The discussion presented in this paper is a model-independent analysis of the misnamed age-of-the-universe problem, this really being an age-of-the-oldest- stars problem. In this paper I trade off precision against robustness: I sacrifice the precision that comes from assuming a particular equation of state, for the robustness that arises from model independence. A briefer presentation of these ideas can be found in [1], while a related analysis is presented in [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Life at the Interface of Particle Physics and String Theory∗
    NIKHEF/2013-010 Life at the Interface of Particle Physics and String Theory∗ A N Schellekens Nikhef, 1098XG Amsterdam (The Netherlands) IMAPP, 6500 GL Nijmegen (The Netherlands) IFF-CSIC, 28006 Madrid (Spain) If the results of the first LHC run are not betraying us, many decades of particle physics are culminating in a complete and consistent theory for all non-gravitational physics: the Standard Model. But despite this monumental achievement there is a clear sense of disappointment: many questions remain unanswered. Remarkably, most unanswered questions could just be environmental, and disturbingly (to some) the existence of life may depend on that environment. Meanwhile there has been increasing evidence that the seemingly ideal candidate for answering these questions, String Theory, gives an answer few people initially expected: a huge \landscape" of possibilities, that can be realized in a multiverse and populated by eternal inflation. At the interface of \bottom- up" and \top-down" physics, a discussion of anthropic arguments becomes unavoidable. We review developments in this area, focusing especially on the last decade. CONTENTS 6. Free Field Theory Constructions 35 7. Early attempts at vacuum counting. 36 I. Introduction2 8. Meromorphic CFTs. 36 9. Gepner Models. 37 II. The Standard Model5 10. New Directions in Heterotic strings 38 11. Orientifolds and Intersecting Branes 39 III. Anthropic Landscapes 10 12. Decoupling Limits 41 A. What Can Be Varied? 11 G. Non-supersymmetric strings 42 B. The Anthropocentric Trap 12 H. The String Theory Landscape 42 1. Humans are irrelevant 12 1. Existence of de Sitter Vacua 43 2. Overdesign and Exaggerated Claims 12 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Holes and Black Hole Thermodynamics Without Event Horizons
    General Relativity and Gravitation (2011) DOI 10.1007/s10714-008-0739-9 RESEARCHARTICLE Alex B. Nielsen Black holes and black hole thermodynamics without event horizons Received: 18 June 2008 / Accepted: 22 November 2008 c Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 Abstract We investigate whether black holes can be defined without using event horizons. In particular we focus on the thermodynamic properties of event hori- zons and the alternative, locally defined horizons. We discuss the assumptions and limitations of the proofs of the zeroth, first and second laws of black hole mechan- ics for both event horizons and trapping horizons. This leads to the possibility that black holes may be more usefully defined in terms of trapping horizons. We also review how Hawking radiation may be seen to arise from trapping horizons and discuss which horizon area should be associated with the gravitational entropy. Keywords Black holes, Black hole thermodynamics, Hawking radiation, Trapping horizons Contents 1 Introduction . 2 2 Event horizons . 4 3 Local horizons . 8 4 Thermodynamics of black holes . 14 5 Area increase law . 17 6 Gravitational entropy . 19 7 The zeroth law . 22 8 The first law . 25 9 Hawking radiation for trapping horizons . 34 10 Fluid flow analogies . 36 11 Uniqueness . 37 12 Conclusion . 39 A. B. Nielsen Center for Theoretical Physics and School of Physics College of Natural Sciences, Seoul National University Seoul 151-742, Korea [email protected] 2 A. B. Nielsen 1 Introduction Black holes play a central role in physics. In astrophysics, they represent the end point of stellar collapse for sufficiently large stars.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Trust a Theory? Some Further Remarks (Part 1)
    Why trust a theory? Some further remarks (part 1). Joseph Polchinski1 Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4030 USA Abstract I expand on some ideas from my recent review \String theory to the rescue." I discuss my use of Bayesian reasoning. I argue that it can be useful but that it is very far from the central point of the discussion. I then review my own personal history with the multiverse. Finally I respond to some criticisms of string theory and the multiverse. Prepared for the meeting \Why Trust a Theory? Reconsidering Scientific Method- ology in Light of Modern Physics," Munich, Dec. 7-9, 2015. [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 It's not about the Bayes. It's about the physics. 2 3 The multiverse and me 4 4 Some critics 9 4.1 George Ellis and Joseph Silk . .9 4.2 Peter Woit, and X . 10 1 Introduction The meeting \Why Trust a Theory? Reconsidering Scientific Methodology in Light of Mod- ern Physics," which took place at the Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Dec. 7-9 2015, was for me a great opportunity to think in a broad way about where we stand in the search for a theory of fundamental physics. My thoughts are now posted at [1]. In this followup discussion I have two goals. The first is to expand on some of the ideas for the first talk, and also to emphasize some aspects of the discussion that I believe need more attention. As the only scientific representative of the multiverse at that meeting, a major goal for me was to explain why I believe with a fairly high degree of probability that this is the nature of our universe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Null Energy Condition and Its Violation
    The Null Energy Condition and its violation V.A. Rubakov Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences Department of Particle Physics and Cosmology Physics Faculty, Moscow State University The Null Energy Condition, NEC µ ν Tµν n n > 0 µ µ for any null vector n , such that nµ n = 0. Quite robust In the framework of classical General Relativity implies a number of properties: Penrose theorem: Penrose’ 1965 Once there is trapped surface, there is singularity in future. Assumptions: (i) The NEC holds (ii) Cauchi hypersurface non-compact Trapped surface: a closed surface on which outward-pointing light rays actually converge (move inwards) Spherically symmetric examples: 2 2 2 2 2 ds = g00dt + 2g0RdtdR + gRRdR R dΩ − 4πR2: area of a sphere of constant t, R. Trapped surface: R decreases along all light rays. Sphere inside horizon of Schwarzschild black hole Hubble sphere in contracting Universe = ⇒ Hubble sphere in expanding Universe = anti-trapped surface = singularity in the past. ⇒ No-go for bouncing Universe scenario and Genesis Related issue: Can one in principle create a universe in the laboratory? Question raised in mid-80’s, right after invention of inflationary theory Berezin, Kuzmin, Tkachev’ 1984; Guth, Farhi’ 1986 Idea: create, in a finite region of space, inflationary initial conditions = this region will inflate to enormous size and in the end will look⇒ like our Universe. Do not need much energy: pour little more than Planckian energy into little more than Planckian volume. At that time: negaive answer [In the framework of classical General Relativity]: Guth, Farhi’ 1986; Berezin, Kuzmin, Tkachev’ 1987 1 Inflation in a region larger than Hubble volume, R > H− = Singularity in the past guaranteed by Penrose theorem ⇒ Meaning: Homogeneous and isotropic region of space: metric ds2 = dt2 a2(t)dx2 .
    [Show full text]