DOCSLIB.ORG

Schengen Evaluation of ROMANIA - Answers to the Questionnaire with a View to the Evaluation of Romania's Preparations for the Application of the Schengen Acquis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Schengen Evaluation of ROMANIA - Answers to the Questionnaire with a View to the Evaluation of Romania's Preparations for the Application of the Schengen Acquis COUNCIL OF Brussels, 3 June 2016 THE EUROPEAN UNION (OR. en) 15533/08 EXT 1 SCH-EVAL 89 COMIX 802 PARTIAL DECLASSIFICATION of document: 15533/08 RESTREINT UE dated: 21 November 2008 new status: Public Subject: Schengen evaluation of ROMANIA - Answers to the questionnaire with a view to the evaluation of Romania's preparations for the application of the Schengen Acquis Delegations will find attached the partially declassified version of the above-mentioned document. ________________________ 15533/08 EXT 1 DG D 1A EN ANNEX COUNCIL OF Brussels, 21 November 2008 THE EUROPEAN UNION 15533/08 RESTREINT UE SCH-EVAL 89 COMIX 802 NOTE from : the Romanian delegation to: the Schengen Evaluation Working Party No. prev. doc. : 15480/2/07 REV 2 SCHEVAL 189 COMIX 984 Subject : Schengen evaluation of ROMANIA - Answers to the questionnaire with a view to the evaluation of Romania's preparations for the application of the Schengen Acquis Delegations will find enclosed the answers from Romania to the Schengen evaluation questionnaire with a view to the evaluation of its preparation for the application of the Schengen acquis. A list of the respective annexes can be found at the end of this document. The annexes themselves were distributed (pdf.format) to delegations on a CD rom during the Schengen Evaluation Working Party of 17 November 2008. They are also available at the General Secretariat of the Council. ___________ 15533/08 EXT 1 1 ANNEX DG D 1A EN SCHENGEN EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE Reply of Romania SCHENGEN ROMANIA 15533/08 EXT 1 2 ANNEX DG D 1A EN Romanian answers on the questionnaire to new Member States with a view to the evaluation of their preparations for the application of the Schengen Acquis INTRODUCTION In compliance with the priority of its foreign policy, Romania began accession negotiations to the EU on February, the 15th 2000. The accession process was concluded on December, the 17th 2004, when the European Council decided to close negotiations with Romania. The signing of the Accession Treaty took place on April, the 25th 2005, in Luxembourg. Romania joined the European Union on January, the 1st 2007. Once a member of the European Union, Romania entered a new period involving the preparation and adoption of necessary measures towards eliminating controls at internal borders with a view to joigning the Schengen area. Romania has been systematically preparing for accession to the Schengen area in parallel with carrying out the activities which targeted EU accession. The actions in this field followed the course set in the National Strategy for accession to the Schengen area (annex 1) and of the Schengen Action Plan (annex 2). By signing the Accession Treaty, Romania assumed the commitment to apply the provisions of Category I Schengen acquis as from the date of EU accession. As far as the Category II provisions are concerned, they will come into force in Romania as of the date of the abolition of the border control at internal borders, on the basis of a decision taken separately by the Council of the European Union. In order to ensure a coherent and unitary approach of Romania’s coordination efforts, the Schengen Department was set up under GD no. 1317/2007. Also, the inter-institutional co-ordination is realized by the National Commission for Schengen auto-evaluation (National Commission), a body set up under GD no. 882/05.07.2006. It is formed of representatives of all institutions with responsibilities in the field. Romania declared its readiness for Schengen accession on June the 28th 2007, on three fields: data protection, police co-operation and visas. A second Declaration of readiness including all fields of evaluation was presented on June, the 2nd, 2008. The answers to the Schengen questionnaire describe the way the Schengen acquis was implemented in Romania, current state of preparations and plans, which will be implemented in the remaining period before the lifting of border control. The questionnaire contains a number of annexes, including the list of abbreviations used. * * * 15533/08 EXT 1 3 ANNEX DG D 1A EN ABBREVIATIONS BCP Border crossing points BP Border Police BPCI Border Police County Inspectorate BPD Border Police Directorate BPS Border police sectors CCC Common Core Curricullum CCI Common Consular Instructions DDLVRC Directorate for Driving Licenses and Vehicles Registration Certificates DIOCTO Directorate for the Investigation of Organized Crime and Terrorism Offences within the Public Ministry EADS European Aeronautic Defence and Space Company eASF Interpol Electronic Automatic Search Facility EAW European arrest warrant EPN European Patrol Network GD Government Decision GDP General Directorate for Passports GDIIP General Directorate for Intelligence and Internal Protection GEO Government Emergency Ordinance GO Government Ordinance GIBP General Inspectorate of Border Police GIRP General Inspectorate of Romanian Police GIRG General Inspectorate of Romanian Gendarmerie IGIMRSB Interministerial Group for the Integrated Management of the Romanian State Border IOM International Organization for Migration IPCC International Police Cooperation Center ISBS Integrated System for Border Security MFA Ministry of Foreign Affairs MIAR Ministry of Interior and Administrative Reform NSAPDP / NSA National Supervisory Authority for Personal Data Processing NCA National Customs Authority NVC National Visa Centre NISA National IT System for Alerts NCMDPR National Centre for Managing the Databases on Persons Records RBP Romanian Border Police RIO Romanian Immigration Office RON New Romanian Currency (Leu) RIS Romanian Intelligence Service SBC Schengen Borders Code SCOD Integrated System for the Surveillance of Vessels’ Itinerary SCOMAR System for the surveillance and observation at the Black Sea UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees VTMIS System Vessel Traffic Management and Information System WAP Wireless Application Protocol 15533/08 EXT 1 4 ANNEX DG D 1A EN C O N T E N T S I. General border management of external borders ....................................................................... 7 II. Specific management of external borders ................................................................................ 60 III. Entry ......................................................................................................................................... 92 IV. Readmission ........................................................................................................................... 103 V. Schengen Information System ................................................................................................ 111 VI. Issuing of visas ....................................................................................................................... 148 VII. Judicial cooperation ................................................................................................................ 165 VIII. Legislation on firearms ........................................................................................................... 171 IX. Police cooperation .................................................................................................................. 175 X. Drugs ...................................................................................................................................... 208 XI. Data protection ....................................................................................................................... 222 Annexes ............................................................................................................................................ 232 15533/08 EXT 1 5 ANNEX DG D 1A EN List of Figures: Figure 1. Organisational structure of the risk analysis procedure 16 Figure 2. Information flow towards the central level 16 Figure 3. Information flow towards the subordinatet units 17 Figure 4. The available human resources of the Romanian Border Police (01.06.2008) 20 Figure 5. Continuous training courses on forged/falsified documents and stolen cars 27 Figure 6. Data exchange through contact points 29 Figure 7. Border Crossing Points’ location Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 8. Naval mobility means at the maritime border 45 Figure 9. Naval mobility means at the Danube and Prut river 45 Figure 10. Surveillance towers location 47 Figure 11. Integrated System for Border Security – PMR Network 48 Figure 12. Border illegal crossings/attempts 49 Figure 13. Estimated level of detection 49 Figure 14. Persons admitted from neighbouring countries 50 Figure 15. Detected illegal immigrants on the Romanian territory 51 Figure 16. Rutes used by illegal migrants 53 Figure 17. Number of passengers of the regular ferry line Odessa – Constanta – Varna 61 Figure 18. Vessels calling at ports from EU and third countries 63 Figure 19. The deployment of SCOMAR Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 20. The Command and Control Centre for SCOMAR Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 21. The network communication subsystem Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 22. Deployment of local operation consoles Error! Bookmark not defined. Figure 23. The general architecture of the Command and Control CentreError! Bookmark not defined. Figure 24. Sample screenshot of Constanta VTMIS System 73 Figure 25. Sample screenshot from AIES 77 Figure 26. International Airpots location 80 Figure 27. Penalties applied by the Romanian Border Police personnel. 96 Figure 28. Reasons for issuing visas in 2007 97 Figure 29. Number of visas granted at the border 97 Figure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Application of Main Component Analysis Method on Indicators of Romanian National Authority for Consumers Protection Activities
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Gabor, Manuela Rozalia; Ştefănescu, Daniela; Conţiu, Lia Codrina Article The Application of Main Component Analysis Method on Indicators of Romanian National Authority for Consumers Protection Activities Amfiteatru Economic Journal Provided in Cooperation with: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies Suggested Citation: Gabor, Manuela Rozalia; Ştefănescu, Daniela; Conţiu, Lia Codrina (2010) : The Application of Main Component Analysis Method on Indicators of Romanian National Authority for Consumers Protection Activities, Amfiteatru Economic Journal, ISSN 2247-9104, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Vol. 12, Iss. 28, pp. 314-331 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/168694 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Benefits of the Sustainability Reporting Practices
    sustainability Article Assessing the Benefits of the Sustainability Reporting Practices in the Top Romanian Companies Anca Gabriela Petrescu 1,*, Florentina Raluca Bîlcan 1, Marius Petrescu 1, 2 3 2 Ionica Holban Oncioiu , Mirela Cătălina Türkes, and Sorinel Căpu¸sneanu 1 Faculty of Economic Sciences, Valahia University, 130024 Targoviste, Romania; bilcan.fl[email protected] (F.R.B.); [email protected] (M.P.) 2 Faculty of Finance-Banking, Accounting and Business Administration, Titu Maiorescu University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania; [email protected] (I.H.O.); [email protected] (S.C.) 3 Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy, Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania; offi[email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-744-322-911 Received: 19 March 2020; Accepted: 21 April 2020; Published: 24 April 2020 Abstract: The concept of sustainability reporting has been addressed by experts worldwide and is defined as the process of communicating the social and environmental effects of the economic actions of organizations to special interest groups within society in general. The main purpose of this research was to identify and analyze the opinions of the real benefits obtained by large companies in Romania following the elaboration of sustainability reports and their contribution to the development of a sustainable economy. A quantitative marketing research was carried out on the sample randomly extracted from a target community of the largest 5750 companies
    [Show full text]
  • Justice and Home Affairs Background
    February 2006 JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS BACKGROUND As stated in the 2005 Comprehensive Monitoring Report, “Romania has taken significant steps to address some of the issues within the political criteria which were highlighted in the 2004 report as requiring further improvements, such as the reform and independence of the judiciary. (…) The fight against corruption should receive high priority. Efforts should focus on the effective enforcement of anti-corruption legislation and on preventive measures, fighting high-level corruption and corruption within law enforcement bodies”. Justice system In March 2005 the new Government adopted an ambitious revised Strategy and Action Plan 2005-2007 to reform the justice system. These documents represent a significant step forward in the plans to create an independent, professional and effective justice system and now need to be internalised by the relevant actors. The Action Plan is being implemented according to schedule, with comprehensive monitoring mechanisms consisting of an inter-institutional commission co-ordinated by the Ministry of Justice and a series of working groups within the Superior Council of the Magistracy. The full and effective implementation of the Action Plan should continue without delay. The availability of financial and human resources and comprehensive training as well as accurate and standardised management statistics will largely determine the success of this operation. Following consultation with stakeholders a revision of the so-called three-law package on justice reform (Laws on the Superior Council of the Magistracy, on the Organisation of the Judiciary and on the Statute of Magistrates) was submitted by the Government to Parliament in June 2005 and adopted after a vote of confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Fight Against Trafficking in Human Beings
    Progress Report - 17 July – 17 August 2006 - - Fight against Trafficking in Human Beings - 1. Legal framework The Law no. 300 from 11 July 2006 for ratifying the Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human beings, adopted on 3 May 2005, open for signature and signed by Romania in Warsaw on 16 May 2005, was adopted. The law was published in the Official Gazette no. 622 from19 July 2006. Through the Government Decision no. 1083 from 16 August 2006, the Government Decision no. 1584/2005 on the setting up and functioning of the National Agency for Preventing the Trafficking in Human Beings and for Monitoring the Assistance provided to the Victims of the Trafficking in Human Beings was amended. The amendments mainly aim to increase the number of the personnel, both in the central structure and in the territorial structures and to strengthen the role that the Agency plays in coordinating the activities developed against trafficking in human beings, according to the recommendations of the EU Monitoring Report from May 2006. Thus: o The new name of the Agency will be The National Agency against Trafficking in Human Beings; o The number of the regional centres of the Agency has been increased from 8 to 15, which will be placed in the counties where Courts of Appeal function; this will ensure a better collaboration with the law enforcement agencies (police, border police), whose coordination structures function in the same counties, in order to take and refer the victims with maximum promptness to the specialized assistance
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Mechanisms in Border Management and Expulsion Operations in Europe
    COMPLAINT MECHANISMS IN BORDER MANAGEMENT AND EXPULSION OPERATIONS IN EUROPE EFFECTIVE REMEDIES FOR VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? Sergio Carrera and Marco Stefan COMPLAINT MECHANISMS IN BORDER MANAGEMENT AND EXPULSION OPERATIONS IN EUROPE EFFECTIVE REMEDIES FOR VICTIMS OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS? SERGIO CARRERA AND MARCO STEFAN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES (CEPS) BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe. The views expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed to CEPS or any other institution with which they are associated or to the European Union. Prof. Sergio Carrera is Senior Research Fellow and Head of Justice and Home Affairs Programme at CEPS, Brussels. He is also Part-Time Professor at the Migration Policy Centre (MPC) in the European University Institute (EUI) in Florence (Italy) and Visiting Professor at the Paris School of International Affairs (PSIA) in Sciences Po, Paris (France). Dr. Marco Stefan is Research Fellow in the Justice and Home Affairs Programme at CEPS. Cover illustration by LeStudio / Shutterstock.com. Cover design Margaita Minkova. ISBN 978-94-6138-677-9 © Copyright 2018, CEPS All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise – without the prior permission of the Centre for European Policy Studies. Centre for European Policy Studies Place du Congrès 1, B-1000 Brussels Tel: (32.2) 229.39.11 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.ceps.eu Contents Preface .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Common Manual for Immigration Liaison Officers (Ilos) Posted Abroad by the Member States of the European Union
    COUNCIL OF Brussels, 25 April 2006 THE EUROPEAN UNION 8418/06 LIMITE CIREFI 16 COMIX 368 NOTE from : General Secretariat to : CIREFI No. prev. doc.: 14759/05 CIREFI 31 COMIX 781 Subject : Draft Common Manual for Immigration Liaison Officers (ILOs) posted abroad by the Member States of the European Union Delegations will find attached the above-mentioned draft Common Manual. ______________ 8418/06 EB/cr 1 DG H I LIMITE EN DRAFT Common Manual For Immigration Liaison Officers posted abroad by the Member States of the European Union 2006 8418/06 EB/cr 2 DG H I LIMITE EN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................5 2. Purpose, Nature And Scope of the Manual.......................................................................5 3. General Part.......................................................................................................................5 3.1 Organisations and persons concerned by this Manual ...............................................5 3.2 ILOs tasks and best practices .....................................................................................6 3.2.1. Constitution of cooperation networks between ILOs through networking activities....................................................................................6 3.2.2. Establish and maintain direct contacts with the competent authorities/ representatives of international organisations in the host country/ ILOs of third countries and commercial
    [Show full text]
  • Border Wars the Arms Dealers Profiting from Europe’S Refugee Tragedy
    BORDER WARS THE ARMS DEALERS PROFITING FROM EUROPE’S REFUGEE TRAGEDY Mark Akkerman Stop Wapenhandel www.stopwapenhandel.org Border wars | 1 AUTHOR: Mark Akkerman EDITORS: Nick Buxton and Wendela de Vries DESIGN: Evan Clayburg PRINTER: Jubels Published by Transnational Institute – www.TNI.org and Stop Wapenhandel – www.StopWapenhandel.org Contents of the report may be quoted or reproduced for non-commercial purposes, provided that the source of information is properly cited. TNI would appreciate receiving a copy or link of the text in which this document is used or cited. Please note that for some images the copyright may lie elsewhere and copyright conditions of those images should be based on the copyright terms of the original source. http://www.tni.org/copyright ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks to Corporate European Observatory for some of the information on arms company lobbying. Border wars: The arms players profiting from Europe’s refugee crisis | 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction: the EU war on immigration 3 Fueling the refugee tragedy: EU arms exports 6 EU response to migration: militarising the borders 9 – ‘Fighting illegal immigration’ – EUNAVFOR MED – Armed forces at the borders – NATO assistance – Border fences and drones – From Frontex to a European Border and Coast Guard Agency – Externalizing EU borders – Deal with Turkey – Selling militarisation as a humanitarian effort Lobbying for business 17 – Lobby organisations – Frontex and industry – Security fairs as meeting points EU funding for border security and border control 25 – Funding for (candidate) member states – Funding third countries’ border security – EU Research & Technology funding – Frontex funding for research – Future prospects for security research Which companies profit from border security? 34 – Global border security market – Frontex contracts – Major profiting companies – Detention and deportation Conclusion 43 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The refugee crisis facing Europe has caused consternation in the corridors of power, and heated debate on Europe’s streets.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste and TFS Inspections in Romania
    Waste and TFS inspections in Romania IMPEL Waste and TFS Conference 16 – 17 October 2019; Bucharest, Romania Outline • Who are we & What are we doing? • EU projects • Networking (national and international) • Why IMPEL member? • SMART planning of waste shipment inspections • SMART in practice • Key mesages Who are we? • The National Environmental Guard is a public institution for inspection and control acting as a specialized body of the central public administration, with legal personality, integrally financed from the state budget, and subordinated to the Ministry of Environment • NEG consist of: GENERAL Legal Service COMMISSARIAT Human Resources DANUBE DELTA 41 COUNTY BUCHAREST BIOSPHERE RESERVE COMMISSARIATES COMMISSARIAT COMMISSARIAT Financial & Public Procurements 621 Commissars & 179 Support staff What we are doing? Industrial pollution control Other… Seveso Inspection Waste & TFS & Chemicals Enforcement Water Nature Soil contamination What we are doing? EU projects • Romania becomes EU member 10 years ago (1 st of January, 2007) and many opportunities revealed to Romanian competent authorities • NEG started to take advantages from the available EU funds in order to build up its capacity: – Supporting NEG to increase its capabilities in inspection and control activities (Twinning Project), 0.8ME – Joint Risk Monitoring during Emergencies in the Danube Area Border (RO-BG), 2.65ME – Improving NEG capacity on implementation and enforcement of hazardous waste and substances, 1.05ME – Developing of methodologies for establishment of
    [Show full text]
  • Italian Historical Migration and Investments in Modern-Day Romania
    CA' FOSCARI UNIVERSITY OF VENICE UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM Double Degree Laurea Magistrale in Economia e gestione delle aziende Master of Science in International Business and Economics Department of Management Associate Professor Dr. Giovanni Favero Master-Thesis Italian Historical Migration and Investments in Modern-day Romania Liviu Constantin Jakob 848196 / 425517 [email protected] [email protected] Venice, October 9th 2014 1 Executive Summary The present master thesis analyses the common historical and economic relationship between Italy and Romania, two countries of Latin origin that have been both founded by the middle of the 19th century, through the unification of different former states of same roots, language, culture and history. The thesis is divided into five chapters. The first chapter covers the middle ages and then the period from the 19th century until 1945, when Italian craftsmen, especially from the provinces of North-Eastern Italy, came to the newly established Romanian Kingdom, laying the foundation for the nowadays officially recognized Italian minority in Romania. The second chapter presents the economic and social relationships between Italy and Romania during the time of the communist regime, which was imposed to Romania by the Soviet Union after World War 2 and lasted until the end of 1989. Chapter three presents the status of the Italian minority after the revolution of 1989 and until today. After the fall of the Iron Curtain, the markets of the former communist states in Eastern Europe were opened to western products and investments. Also Romania opened its economy step by step during the transitional period from communism to capitalism and free market.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Ordinance No. 7 of 4 April 2020
    The Official Journal of Romania, Part I, No 284/4.04.2020 The Ministry of Internal Affairs Agreed Prime Minister Ludovic Orban Military Ordinance on measures to prevent the spread of COVID 19 Considering the provisions of Article 24 of the Government Emergency Ordinance no.1/1999 regarding the state of siege and the emergency regime, published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I, no.22 of January 21, 1999, approved with amendments and additions by Law no. 453/2004, with subsequent amendments and additions, of Article 2 and Article 4, paragraph 2 of the Decree of the President of Romania no. 195/2020 on establishing the state of emergency at national level, published in the Official Journal of Romania, Part I, no. 212 of March 16, 2020, Taking into account the assessment made by the National Committee for Special Emergency Situations, approved by Decision no. 18 of April 4, 2020, For the implementation of provisions of points 1, 3 and 4 of Annex no.2 to the Decree of the President of Romania no. 195/2020, Based on Article 20 (n) of the Government Emergency Ordinance no.1/1999, with subsequent amendments and additions, The Minister of Internal Affairs has issued the following military ordinance: Chapter I Establishing the quarantine measure in the city of Ţăndărei, Ialomiţa county Art. 1 The quarantine measure is established during the state of emergency in the city of Ţăndărei, Ialomiţa county. Art. 2 In the locality under quarantine referred to in Art. 1, entry and exit are allowed for: a) freight transport, regardless of its nature, of raw materials and resources necessary to carry out the economic activities in the locality under quarantine, as well as to supply the population; b) persons who do not live in the quarantine area but who carry out economic activities in the fields of defence, public order, national security, health, emergency situations, local public administration, welfare and social protection, judiciary, public utility services, energy, agriculture, public food, water supply, communications and transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Il Monitoraggio Dei Rimpatri Forzati in Europa. Strategie, Criticità E Buone Pratiche
    IL MONITORAGGIO DEI RIMPATRI FORZATI IN EUROPA. STRATEGIE, CRITICITÀ E BUONE PRATICHE Ricerca realizzata nell’ambito del progetto “Realizzazione di un sistema di monitoraggio dei rimpatri forzati” finanziato al Garante nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale attraverso il Programma nazionale Asilo Migrazione Integrazione (FAMI) 2014/2020 Team di progetto Massimiliano Bagaglini, Responsabile del progetto Antonella Dionisi, Referente per il monitoraggio del progetto Nicolò Maurizio Rallo, Referente amministrazione e rendicontazione Elena Adamoli, Ufficio Privazione della libertà e migranti Dario Pasquini, Comunicazione e Ufficio stampa Team di ricerca e redazione del Rapporto: Bianca Bonelli, Marta Lovison, Irene Pavlidi Fondazione ISMU Revisione del testo Elena Adamoli, Massimiliano Bagaglini, Antonio Marchesi ©Copyright Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale Citazione consigliata: Fondazione ISMU (2019), Il monitoraggio dei rimpatri forzati in Europa. Strategie, criticità e buone pratiche, Garante Nazionale dei diritti delle persone detenute o private della libertà personale 2 Sommario Introduzione .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 Nota metodologica .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1. Il caso italiano: il quadro
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Border Control for Combating Cross Border Crime
    AGORA International Journal of Juridical Sciences, www.juridicaljournal.univagora.ro ISSN 1843-570X, E-ISSN 2067-7677 No. 4 (2013), pp. 88-96 EU BORDER CONTROL FOR COMBATING CROSS BORDER CRIME F. Matea ş Florian Matea ş Law and Economics Faculty, Social Sciences Department Agora University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania *Correspondence: Florian Matea ş, Agora University of Oradea, 8 Pia ţa Tineretului St., Oradea, Romania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract One area of particular interest, both the European Union and Romania, is the border issue, which requires the setting up of a common institutional framework that embodies all specific courses of action across the EU. The area of border control and Schengen cooperation, which is very important and at the same time very sensitive, imposed at Community level, a continuous development of legal regulations in order to ensure effective security of the EU's external borders. Romania's geo-strategic position makes the Black Sea an indispensable part of Euro- Atlantic security and prosperity. Many of transnational threats facing Europe come from this region. A big part of the area is dominated by economic stagnation, unsafe and insecure borders, organized crime activities and frozen ethnic conflicts. Keywords : border control, organized crime, risk analysis, target. Introduction Romania’s accession to the European Union has resulted in, among other things, establishing new borders of the Community. Thus Romania becomes the eastern limit of the European Union, an important factor, with high share in promoting the interests, values and shared vision of the European space to these areas, the vector of interests of Western democracies, and will support in the future different forms of EU cooperation to other areas of interest.
    [Show full text]