DOCSLIB.ORG

NEW YORK UNIVERSITY the International Role in Libya's

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY the International Role in Libya's NEW YORK UNIVERSITY CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The International Role in Libya’s Transition | August 2011 - March 2012 Emily O’Brien with Richard Gowan July 2012 NEW YORK UNIVERSITY CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION The world faces old and new security challenges that are more complex than our multilateral and national institutions are currently capable of managing. International cooperation is ever more necessary in meeting these challenges. The NYU Center on International Cooperation (CIC) works to enhance international responses to conflict, insecurity, and scarcity through applied research and direct engagement with multilateral institutions and the wider policy community. CIC’s programs and research activities span the spectrum of conflict, insecurity and scarcity issues. This allows us to see critical inter-connections and highlight the coherence often necessary for effective response. We have a particular concentration on the UN and multilateral responses to conflict. Table of Contents The International Role in Libya’s Transition | August 2011-March 2012 Emily O’Brien with Richard Gowan Authors and acknowledgements 2 Foreword 3 The International Role in Libya’s Transition | August 2011- March 2012 6 August 2011 6 September 2011 8 October 2011 13 Gaddafi’s death 15 The end of the NATO mission 16 November 2011 19 December 2011 22 January 2012 25 February 2012 28 March 2012 29 Authors and acknowledgements Emily O’Brien is a Senior Program Officer at CIC. Richard Gowan is Associate Director at CIC. He is also a Senior Policy Fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations. The authors would like to thank the officials and experts who offered comments on earlier versions of this report. CIC’s Laurie Mincieli also provided extremely useful editorial assistance. All errors in this report remain the authors’ own. All views expressed in this report are those of the authors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of CIC. 2 NYU The International Role in Libya’s Transition | August 2011 - March 2012 CIC The International Role in Libya’s tion. While the new Libyan authorities were opposed to Transition | August 2011- March 2012 any international military presence, regional politics also worked against the deployment of peacekeeping troops Foreword from a Western organization like NATO, and there was no appetite for any such mission in the budget-strained al- Following the death of Muammar Gaddafi in October liance. The Arab League and African Union did not have 2011, the situation in Libya fell largely out of the headlines, the operational capacity to mount an effective assistance with the majority of reports focused on the fragile security mission. The UN was the most viable actor to lead interna- environment there. Meanwhile, international attention tional assistance efforts, but deploying a heavy UN peace- has been fixed on the crisis in Syria. keeping operation did not gain traction as an acceptable model. One reason that Libya receded from international attention was that the UN did not put a large-scale post- Instead, the UN took its cue from the Libyan transitional conflict presence in place there, as it has done in situations government. UNSMIL’s operations have been tailored to like those in Kosovo, Haiti and Afghanistan. The UN the type of assistance the National Transitional Council Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL), mandated by Security (NTC) has requested. From the outset Ian Martin, UNSMIL’s Council Resolution 2009 on 16 September 2011, has a head and the Secretary-General’s special representative for broad mandate but a light footprint. Although the UN Libya, made clear that the UN would be responsive to the has taken the lead in post-conflict peacebuilding support, priorities that Libya’s NTC set out for the transition. Martin Libya has not proved to be a classic case for blue helmets. described UNSMIL’s initial mission as “an opportunity not This approach has reinforced the false impression that only to provide immediate assistance and advice to the the international community is not deeply engaged in NTC… but then through that engagement to make sure 3 rebuilding Libya. that the longer-term mission that we recommend to the Security Council genuinely reflects Libyan ownership CIC’s last report The Libyan War: A Diplomatic History pre- and Libyan wishes.”1 The ongoing process of assisting the sented a record of the international community’s diplo- political transition and beginning peacebuilding work has matic engagement over Libya, from the first international not been built around peacekeeping or a very large-scale responses to the uprising there in February 2011 to the political mission. eve of the rebel assault on Tripoli in August 2011. This re- port picks up where the last left off, and tracks internation- Its light footprint aside, UNSMIL has played a central role al efforts to stabilize the country and begin the process of in post-conflict work in Libya and in coordinating other reintegrating it into the international community, ending international actors. The complexity of these multilateral with the Security Council’s decision to renew UNSMIL’s engagements on Libya stands out. This report highlights mandate for a year in March 2012. Although there have the range of international actors involved in Libya’s been important developments in Libya since March, the transition, and their work in responding to a series of goal of this report is to highlight that international assis- challenges: tance to the country after Gaddafi’s fall was wide-ranging and important — even if it received relatively little public- • Addressing human rights concerns. Reports of ity. In a period in which the future of large-scale interna- rampant abuses by Gaddafi troops in the last days tional interventions is in doubt, the Libyan case may offer of his regime were followed by accounts of torture precedents for future post-conflict situations. and abuse by militia forces. A UN inter-agency humanitarian assessment team was dispatched Some commentators initially debated how to get peace- to Tripoli in September; the UN Office of the High keeping troops on the ground in Libya rapidly, and which organizations had the capabilities to stabilize the situa- 1. “New UN political mission in Libya begins operations and deployment of staff”,UN News Centre, 22 September 2011. NYU The International Role in Libya’s Transition | August 2011 - March 2012 CIC Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) put a hardware previously in the Gaddafi regime’s team of senior officials in the field and the high possession. The UN sent an inter-agency assessment commissioner, Navi Pillay, was vocal about the mission there in December; UN political offices situation; and the Independent Commission of in West Africa and Central Africa met to address Inquiry in Libya (ICIL), set up by the UN Human Rights regional security concerns; the Organization for Council, urged the NTC to investigate allegations the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) of abuse. The Commission released a widely-read undertook an assessment of the security of Libya’s report on 2 March summarizing its findings. weapon stockpiles and provided assistance to the NTC; and the UNSC passed Resolution 2017, calling • Taking up transitional justice issues. The Inter- on states in the region to prevent the proliferation of national Criminal Court (ICC) has been at odds with arms with international assistance. Libyan authorities over Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi’s future, as well as that of Muammar Gaddafi’s former intelli- • Building an inclusive political framework. The gence chief Abdullah Senussi. Following the capture interim government is committed to an ambitious of the two men within days of each other, the tran- timeline of political reform, including national sitional government resisted turning them over to elections that took place in early July. The NTC the Court, where they face charges of crimes against declared Libya to be liberated three days after humanity. At the time of this writing, the Court had Gaddafi’s death, and in October 2011 named a not issued a final legal determination on whether prime minister, Abdurrahim El-Keib, who formed Libya could try the two men, per the Libyan interim a cabinet to run the interim government until the government’s petition. Complicating the situation, national elections. But political bargaining between 4 reports suggest that the men remain in the custody interested parties has been slow in coming, as groups of two different militias, and not under the interim continue to operate as separate power brokers government’s direct control. outside of government purview. The continued activity of Libya’s militias has raised concerns about • Creating conditions for economic recovery. the interim government’s ability to centralize International assistance for Libya’s economic authority, much less to bring a diverse coalition of recovery has proceeded along multiple tracks. political actors under its umbrella. The UN Security Council led the process of ending sanctions against Libya, freeing up needed assets • Establishing security. Concerns about the security for the NTC. Libya also looked to strengthen bilateral environment in Libya have threatened to overshad- ties with neighbors, and Gulf countries like Qatar ow all other stabilization work. Describing fighting and the UAE that played a role in NATO’s military between armed brigades in January, Ian Martin operations during the war. The NTC, European Union, noted that “Although authorities have successfully United Nations, World Bank, International Monetary contained these and other more minor incidents Fund (IMF) and other international partners jointly that continue to take place across the country on agreed on a framework for a post-conflict needs a regular basis, there is the ever-present possibility assessment in September 2011, creating a basis that similar outbreaks of violence could escalate.”2 for important political-financial linkages for post- Despite intensive international efforts in other areas conflict assistance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unscreportlibyanov2011eng1.Pdf
    Le Bureau du Procureur The Office of the Prosecutor SECOND REPORT OF THE PROSECUTOR OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT TO THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO UNSCR 1970 (2011) INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 February 2011 the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1970 (2011), referring the situation in Libya since 15 February 2011 to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and stressing “the need to hold to account those responsible for attacks, including by forces under their control, on civilians.” 2. Paragraph 7 of the Resolution invites the Prosecutor to address the Security Council within two months of the adoption of this resolution and every six months thereafter on actions taken pursuant to this resolution. The Prosecutor first briefed the United Nations Security Council on 4 May 2011. 3. This second report provides a summary of the activities of the Office of the Prosecutor undertaken to implement Resolution 1970 (2011), including: a. The request to issue arrest warrants for Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar Gaddafi (Muammar Gaddafi), Saif Al‐Islam Gaddafi, and Abdullah Al‐Senussi. b. Cooperation, and c. The ongoing investigation. 1. THE REQUEST FOR ARREST WARRANTS FOR MUAMMAR MOHAMMED ABU MINYAR GADDAFI (MUAMMAR GADDAFI), SAIF AL‐ISLAM GADDAFI, AND ABDULLAH AL‐SENUSSI 1.1 Notice to the United Nations Security Council 4. In its Resolution 1970, the Security Council rejected ʺunequivocally the incitement to hostility and violence against the civilian population made from the highest level of the Libyan government,ʺ and considered ʺthat the widespread and systematic attacks currently taking place in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya against the civilian population may amount to crimes against humanity.” 5.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis in Libya
    APRIL 2011 ISSUE BRIEF # 28 THE CRISIS IN LIBYA Ajish P Joy Introduction Libya, in the throes of a civil war, now represents the ugly facet of the much-hyped Arab Spring. The country, located in North Africa, shares its borders with the two leading Arab-Spring states, Egypt and Tunisia, along with Sudan, Tunisia, Chad, Niger and Algeria. It is also not too far from Europe. Italy lies to its north just across the Mediterranean. With an area of 1.8 million sq km, Libya is the fourth largest country in Africa, yet its population is only about 6.4 million, one of the lowest in the continent. Libya has nearly 42 billion barrels of oil in proven reserves, the ninth largest in the world. With a reasonably good per capita income of $14000, Libya also has the highest HDI (Human Development Index) in the African continent. However, Libya’s unemployment rate is high at 30 percent, taking some sheen off its economic credentials. Libya, a Roman colony for several centuries, was conquered by the Arab forces in AD 647 during the Caliphate of Utman bin Affan. Following this, Libya was ruled by the Abbasids and the Shite Fatimids till the Ottoman Empire asserted its control in 1551. Ottoman rule lasted for nearly four centuries ending with the Ottoman defeat in the Italian-Ottoman war. Consequently, Italy assumed control of Libya under the Treaty of 1 Lausanne (1912). The Italians ruled till their defeat in the Second World War. The Libyan constitution was enacted in 1949 and two years later under Mohammed Idris (who declared himself as Libya’s first King), Libya became an independent state.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion Paper: Libya and R2P and Regime Change
    Thinking About Libya, the Responsibility to Protect and Regime Change: A “Lessons Learned” Discussion Paper Robin Collins October, 2011 This discussion paper on the application of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine in Libya is intended to stimulate dialogue among members of the World Federalist Movement – Canada (WFMC) and other R2P advocates. We begin with the assumption that there was a real need for the international community to respond to the threats and behaviour of the Libyan government of Moammar Gaddafi. In the circumstances, the UN Security Council resolutions that followed Gaddafi‘s actions, resolutions 1970 and 1973, and then resolution 2009 which recognized the National Transitional Council after the fall of Gaddafi, were appropriate responses to the crisis. There was explicit reference to a responsibility to protect civilians and civilian areas. The International Criminal Court was referenced (in resolutions 1970, 1973 and 2009). There was demand for a ceasefire, to diplomatic channels being opened, to dialogue towards political reform (resolution1973), and to an arms embargo and freezing of assets. In resolution 1973 “all necessary measures” were authorized, as was a no-fly zone to protect Libyan civilians, including those in Benghazi. However, there were many rough edges and a fair amount of (intended?) ambiguity. These topics are important to explore so that we are clear about where mandates were followed, or violated. Our goal is to strengthen the R2P doctrine so that it becomes a reliable new normative framework for future international diplomacy and protection of civilians. The experience of application in Libya will impact future efforts by the United Nations to invoke R2P.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation of Human Rights in Libya, and the Effectiveness of Technical Assistance and Capacity-Building Measures Received by the Government of Libya
    United Nations A/HRC/43/75 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 January 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty-third session 24 February–20 March 2020 Agenda items 2 and 10 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Technical assistance and capacity-building Situation of human rights in Libya, and the effectiveness of technical assistance and capacity-building measures received by the Government of Libya Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Summary In the present report, submitted to the Human Rights Council pursuant to Council resolution 40/27, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights describes the situation of human rights in Libya from January to December 2019, and provides an overview of the work and technical assistance conducted by the Human Rights, Transitional Justice and Rule of Law Service of the United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) in cooperation with the Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR). The High Commissioner highlights key human rights issues relating to the protection of civilians in armed conflict, in particular its impact on women and children; the situation of migrants and refugees; the rights to freedom of opinion and expression; the administration of justice; and the support provided to victims of human rights violations. The High Commissioner also describes capacity-building activities conducted by UNSMIL and the implementation of the human rights due diligence policy on United Nations support to non-United Nations security forces. The High Commissioner concludes the report with recommendations for the Government of National Accord in Libya, all parties to the conflict and the international community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Arab Presidents for Life ÀÀÀ and After
    Middle East Development Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2013) 1350001 (13 pages) °c Economic Research Forum DOI: 10.1142/S1793812013500016 THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF ARAB PRESIDENTS ¤ FOR LIFE | AND AFTER ROGER OWEN Center for Middle Eastern Studies Harvard University Cambridge, MA [email protected] Received 23 August 2012 Accepted 23 January 2013 Published 14 March 2013 The system of personalized Arab presidential power based on a strong security state had its origins in the assertion of national sovereignty in the dangerous post-independence world of the 1950s and 1960s. and then becoming more monarchical in character over time, including the attempt to perpetuate itself by passing power on to the ruler’s son. Key to this development was the appearance around each ruler of a small group of crony-capitalists who used their privileged access to secure state monopolies which they then schemed to protect after the ruler’s death. Both developments, that of family dictatorships, as well as their associated corruption and cronyism, can then be used to account in large measure with the uprisings associated with the Arab `Spring'. Keywords: Personalized power; authoritarianism; crony capitalism; coup-proof; kleptocracy; succession; Arab middle class; Arab Spring. by WSPC on 03/19/13. For personal use only. 1. Introduction Middle East. Dev. J. Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com The overthrow of a series of long-term dictatorships was clearly the major aim of the revolutionaries of the so-called `Arab Spring'. And remarkably successful they were. In a relatively short period of time, three republican presidents for life (Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, Hosni Mubarak, and Muammar Qadda¯) have been deposed, two others (Bashar Hafez al-Assad and Ali Abdullah Saleh) have been forced into the ¯ght of their lives to defend themselves, and two others again (Abdelaziz Boute°ika and Omar al-Bashir) much weakened, although by a variety of forces not all directly connected with an active youth rebellion.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Clippings
    SPECIAL COURT FOR SIERRA LEONE OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE See additional photos from the Prosecutor’s Outreach to Yiffin, Alikalia and Kurubola in Koinadugu District in today’s ‘Special Court Supplement’. PRESS CLIPPINGS Enclosed are clippings of local and international press on the Special Court and related issues obtained by the Outreach and Public Affairs Office as at: Friday, 4 November 2011 Press clips are produced Monday through Friday. Any omission, comment or suggestion, please contact Martin Royston-Wright Ext 7217 2 Local News RCS Dismisses Sierra Leonean Prisoners’ Claims / Exclusive Page 3 International News Taylor’s Trial Not Tie to Election / The New Dawn Page 4 RCS Dismisses Sierra Leonean Prisoners' Claims / The New Times Page 5 Libya: Nato to be investigated by ICC for war crimes / The Telegraph Pages 6-7 ICC looks into possible Nato crimes in Libya / Radio Netherlands Pages 8-9 Special Court Supplement The Prosecutor’s Outreach to Koinadugu District, in Pictures Pages 10-12 3 Exclusive Friday, 4 November 2011 4 The New Dawn (Liberia) Friday, 4 November 2011 Taylor’s Trial Not Tie to Election The UN backed Special Court for Sierra Leone says the delay in the trial of ex-President Charles Taylor is not tied to politics here, while clarifying that the late Judge Cassese was not a judge of the special court. Reacting to an article in this paper “Tragedy Hits the Special Court”, the Court’s Communication Chief, Peter Andersen in an email said “We were surprised at your article referenced above; since the press release was very clear that Judge Cassese was not a judge at the Special Court” “Also, if you have "unconfirmed reports" that the judges are taking the Liberian elections into consideration, and then I can only say that it is "unconfirmed speculation" by people not close to the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: Protect Vulnerable Minorities & Assist Civilians Harmed
    Libya: Protect Vulnerable Minorities & Assist Civilians Harmed • The Libyan authorities should work with UNSMIL, IOM, the U.S., and other donors to provide protec- tion for displaced sub-Saharan Africans, including through the adoption of migrant-friendly policies and compliance with human rights obligations. • The Libyan authorities should work with UNSMIL, the U.S., and other donors to protect displaced dark-skinned Libyans, foster reconciliation, and provide long-term solutions for them. • The Libyan authorities should request NATO’s, the U.S’s, and UNSMIL’s long-term commitment, and technical and financial assistance to develop an effective security sector capable of protecting civil- ians. • NATO must fully and transparently investigate, and when appropriate make amends for civilian harm incurred as a result of its military operations in Libya. Similarly, the Libyan authorities should ensure all civilian conflict-losses are accounted for and amends offered to help civilians recover. With the death of Muammar Gaddafi a long-standing dictatorship has come to an end. The majority of Libyans are celebrating a new future; but certain groups, including suspected loyalist civilians, sub-Saharan Africans, and ethnic minorities remain displaced and vulnerable to violent attacks. The National Transitional Council (NTC) – the current de facto government of Libya – lacks command and control over all armed groups, including those responsible for revenge attacks. As such, the NTC cannot yet establish or maintain the rule of law. The plight of these vulnerable civilians foreshadows challenges to reconciliation, integration, and equal treatment of all in the new Libya. Further, civilians suffering losses during hostilities have not been properly recognized or assisted.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy Promotion and Turkey Bilal Ciplak [email protected]
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 6-26-2014 Democracy Promotion and Turkey Bilal Ciplak [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI14071105 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Ciplak, Bilal, "Democracy Promotion and Turkey" (2014). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1439. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1439 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida DEMOCRACY PROMOTION AND TURKEY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICAL SCIENCE by Bilal Ciplak 2014 To: Interim Dean Michael R. Heithaus College of Arts and Sciences This dissertation, written by Bilal Ciplak, and entitled Democracy Promotion and Turkey, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment. We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved. _______________________________________ Benjamin Smith _______________________________________ Markus Thiel _______________________________________ Ronald Cox _______________________________________ Mohiaddin Mesbahi, Major Professor Date of Defense: June 26, 2014 The dissertation of Bilal Ciplak is approved. _______________________________________ Interim Dean Michael R. Heithaus College of Arts and Sciences ______________________________________ Dean Lakshmi N. Reddi University Graduate School Florida International University, 2014 ii © Copyright 2014 by Bilal Ciplak All rights reserved. iii DEDICATIONS I dedicate this dissertation to my wife, Zehra, and to my daughter, Sara, who was born on June 14, 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Activism in Tunisia, Egypt, and Jordan As Case Studies
    Structure of Mobilization and Democratization: Youth Activism in Tunisia, Egypt, and Jordan as Case Studies by Mohammad Yaghi A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Guelph, Ontario, Canada © Mohammad Yaghi, April, 2015 ABSTRACT STRUCTURE OF MOBILIZATION AND DEMOCRATIZATION: YOUTH ACTIVISM IN TUNISIA, EGYPT, AND JORDAN AS CASE STUDIES Mohammad Yaghi Advisors: Professor Janine A. Clark University of Guelph, 2015 Professor Jordi Diez Professor Francesco Cavatorta This dissertation argues for a correlation between the dynamics of the protests at their climax and the processes of democratization in case these protests succeed. Using youth activism in Tunisia and Egypt where the protests succeeded, and in Jordan where they failed as a contrasting case study, this research shows that youth activism leads to democratization if three conditions are met at the protests’ apex: domination of autonomous youth movements, an inclusive master frame (MF), and a decentralized leadership. In doing so, the research provides an atypical narrative about the role of activists during the protests in Tunisia, Egypt, and Jordan. The primary sources that informed this research are not only based on the activists themselves, but also on the analysis of the protests videos, slogans, and documents of the youth movements. Furthermore, the research contributes to the literature on social movements in four domains. First, it reveals that the state’s use of repression and the way it uses it is a necessary condition, but is insufficient to turn a reform protest cycle into a revolution; the other necessary condition is that an autonomous opposition also must be dominant when the state uses repression.
    [Show full text]
  • Speak Softly and Carry a Sealed Warrant: Building the International Criminal Court’S Legitimacy in the Wake of Sudan
    APPEAL VOLUME 18 n 163 ARTICLE SPEAK SOFTLY AND CARRY A SEALED WARRANT: BUILDING THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT’S LEGITIMACY IN THE WAKE OF SUDAN Kai Sheffield* CITED: (2013) 18 Appeal 163-175 INTRODUCTION The Rome Statute, the constitutive treaty of the International Criminal Court (ICC), sets out the goals by which the Court’s legitimacy can be measured: punishment of perpetrators, deterrence of future crimes, and positive effects on the peace, security, and well-being of the world.1 Upholding and enhancing the legitimacy of the ICC is the duty of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court,2 and Luis Moreno Ocampo, Prosecutor until June 2012, made it his project to make the ICC a “reality” which political actors “cannot ignore.”3 During his time in office, Moreno Ocampo handed over a steady stream of accused war criminals and genocidaires from states party to the Rome Statute (State Parties) to the judges in The Hague.4 However, he was much less successful in bringing defendants from non-State Parties before the Court. Under the Rome Statute, the ICC possesses a limited power of universal jurisdiction, whereby it may prosecute individuals from non-State Parties through referrals from the United Nations Security Council (UNSC).5 This power, however, is not well- * Kai Sheffield completed his J.D. at the University of Toronto Faculty of Law in the spring of 2012 and is currently an associate at Sullivan & Cromwell LLP in New York City. He completed his undergraduate degree in International Relations at the University of British Columbia. Kai wrote a shorter version of this paper as a third-year law student for Professor Michael Ignatieff’s Human Rights and International Politics class and is very grateful to Professor Ignatieff for his guidance and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab Spring Incidents in the End of the “Green Era” in Libya: Questions on the Right to Intervene and the Duty to Interfere
    Austral: Brazilian Journal of Strategy & International Relations | e-ISSN 2238-6912 | ISSN 2238-6262| v.2, n.3, Jan-Jun 2013 | p.145-165 ARAB SPRING INCIDENTS IN THE END OF THE “GREEN ERA” IN LIBYA: QUESTIONS ON THE RIGHT TO INTERVENE AND THE DUTY TO INTERFERE Gladys Lechini de Álvarez1, Noemí S. Rabbia2 The Arab Spring has quietly started in the end of 2010 with the wave of protests against the Tunisian regime of Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, in power for more than two decades. Nonetheless, it caused a domino effect that fully impacted the oldest autocracies in Northern Africa and the Middle East. In this context, the Tunis’ case has been constituted in the beginning of a long series of successes that reshaped the Arab and Maghrebi regional political scene with similar results, considering the specifics of each scenario. It is interesting to highlight that Tunis paradoxically had been sustained many times by the same Western countries that defended the end of the Libyan autocracy. In reference to this particular case, Muammar Gaddafi has died in obscure circumstances during the seizure of his hometown, Sirte, in October 20th, 2011. The elucidation of this fact has been diluted with the euphoria and increasing successes, and Western employees like the Vice-President of the United States of America, Joseph Biden, have limited themselves to affirm that 1 Gladys Lechini is Profesor of International Relations at Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina; researcher at CONICET; and director of the South-South Cooperation and Relations Program (PRECSUR). E-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Date with History As UN Acts Over Libya by Harvey Morris , 27 February 2011
    Date with history as UN acts over Libya By Harvey Morris , 27 February 2011 Muammer Gaddafi, at his only appearance before the UN, ripped pages out of its founding Charter and branded its Security Council the Terror Council. Less than 18 months on, that same council has now acted with unprecedented speed and unanimity to try and hasten his downfall. There was a forgivable atmosphere of self-congratulation among diplomats of the 15 council members on Saturday night after a grinding day of bargaining that led to the adoption of sanctions against the rapidly shrinking Libyan regime. The question, as always: will they work? The intention, summed up by Susan Rice, US envoy to the UN, was “stopping the violence against innocent civilians”. But are an asset freeze, a travel ban, an arms embargo – even the threat of future prosecution for war crimes – enough to deter a regime fighting for its survival? Diplomats acknowledge that the measures might not divert Colonel Gaddafi from his murderous intention to crush the Libyan uprising. However, they could persuade his cohorts of military and security henchman that there is still time to bail out before the inevitable end. Why fight on in a lost cause, only to end up penniless in an international court, facing life imprisonment for war crimes? For the first time, the Security Council unanimously referred a case of state violence to the International Criminal Court. That alone was a big victory for the resolution’s British and French drafters and could set an important longer-term precedent. The UK and France are the only permanent members of the council even to have ratified the Rome Treaty that established the court.
    [Show full text]