2014 ENERGY BENCHMARKING REPORT San Francisco Municipal Buildings

December 2015

Cover and first page photos: San Francisco General Hospital

San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) serves as the only trauma center for both San Francisco and Northern San Mateo counties. At SFGH, service is provided to a wide array of individuals, including 70% of inpatients that are either uninsured or underinsured. Just as importantly, SFGH has been a longtime partner (more than 130 years!) with UCSF, facilitating education by conducting 32% of all resident training to ensure that the next generation of medical caretakers is properly qualified.

In calendar year 2014, SFGH showcased energy savings of 13.1% when compared to 2013. Furthermore, its carbon footprint decreased 15.5% from 32.15 to 27.18 pounds of CO2 per square foot. A sizeable portion of these savings are due to energy efficiency measures taken over the last five years, including a generator upgrade project, which was estimated to save SFGH about two million therms of natural gas, or about 11,700 tons of CO2, annually. In total, the SFPUC contributed nearly $600,000 towards these energy efficiency improvements, including a $450,000 dollar loan.

SFGH has also undertaken a major rebuild including a new nine-story, 453,000 square foot hospital building. Opening in December 2015, this new property is seeking LEED Gold certification and is projected to save SFGH substantial quantities of energy and water. Funding for this project was provided by the voter’s passage of Proposition A in 2008 and its management was handled by the San Francisco Department of Public Works.

Acknowledgements Thanks to the Climate Liaisons and other staff of the departments and Gathering the information necessary to complete this report involved agencies represented in this report. contributions of time and expertise by numerous people at 26 different departments and agencies. This is the fourth annual report publicly Department abbreviations used in the report are indicated at the right. disclosing the energy consumption of San Francisco’s municipal buildings, and includes additional facilities that were not part of previous Animal Care and Control ACC reports. Continued care went into ensuring that data is as complete and Arts Commission SFAC accurate as possible. Asian Art Museum AAM

California Academy of Sciences CAS SFPUC Power Enterprise staff: City College of San Francisco CCSF Dan Heffernan Convention Facilities Department / Moscone Center CFD Jonathan Cherry District Attorney DA Terrence O’Sullivan Department of Emergency Management DEM Jamie Seidel Department of Public Health DPH Matt Greco Department of Public Works DPW Hina Dave Department of Technology DT Masoud Vafaei Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco FAMSF Fire Department SFFD Thanks to: Human Services Agency HSA John Cook (Utility Management Services) & Amy Chan (SFUSD) Juvenile Probation JUV Rhab Boughn (Fire Department) Municipal Transportation Agency SFMTA Mark Palmer (SF Environment) Office of City Administrator (Central Shops) GSA Chrissy Smith (School Project for Utility Rate Reduction, SPURR) Police Department SFPD Public Library SFPL Real Estate Division RED Recreation & Park Department RPD SFPUC Project Manager: Matthew Kozuch San Francisco International Airport SFO Please email any questions about this report to: [email protected] San Francisco Public Utilities Commission SFPUC San Francisco Unified School District SFUSD

Sheriff’s Department SHF War Memorial and Performing Arts Center WMPAC

Table of Contents

Executive Summary 5

Introduction 7

San Francisco’s Approach to Benchmarking 8

Energy Use in San Francisco’s Municipal Buildings 10

2014 Energy Benchmarking Results 14

Putting the Results in Context 33

Appendix A: Key to Benchmarking Notes 34

Appendix B: EUI Normalized by Hours of Operation 35

Photograph Information and Sources 37

Executive Summary for a 1-100 rating. Of the municipal facilities eligible for a rating, over 87% outperformed the national median for similar buildings. Only 4 out Background of 132 rating-eligible facilities ranked in the bottom 25% compared to their national peers. This fourth annual report details the energy performance of 465 of San Francisco’s municipal facilities during calendar year 2014, including Comparison to Prior Years: The improving energy use and greenhouse almost 49 million square feet of building area. gas (GHG) emissions trends noted in the previous three reports continued this year, largely due to significant reductions in natural gas In 2011, the San Francisco Existing Commercial Buildings Energy use. The overall EUI of benchmarked facilities1 improved 9.9% from Performance Ordinance was approved by the Board of Supervisors and 2013 and 16.2% compared to 2009. The average 2014 carbon signed by Mayor Edwin M. Lee. The ordinance requires owners of non- footprint of benchmarked facilities improved 15.9% from 2013 and residential buildings over 10,000 square feet to annually benchmark and 27.4% compared to 2009.2 disclose the energy performance of their buildings, using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager tool to obtain ENERGY STAR ratings when possible. Energy Use Intensity - EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) As the owner and occupant of hundreds of buildings, the City and County 7.00 81.26 90.00 78.70 78.06 of San Francisco has chosen to lead by example and provide 75.09 73.12 80.00 transparency about its own operations. The report also includes data on 6.00 65.92 over 130 San Francisco Unified School District facilities and 10 City 70.00 5.89 College of San Francisco facilities. 5.00 5.68 5.56 5.27 60.00 4.00 4.90 By distributing this report on behalf of 26 different agencies, the SFPUC 50.00 4.12 hopes to provide a fresh perspective on these public facilities, 3.00 GHG Emissions 40.00 highlighting energy performance successes and focusing attention and Intensity 30.00 resources on buildings that may benefit from energy improvements. 2.00 (kBtu/sq.ft.) 20.00 1.00 Key Findings 10.00 0.00 0.00 Comparison by Building Type: The detailed charts in this report give a rich 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 amount of information about each location. For each facility type, the Figure 1: The EUI of benchmarked facilities improved 16.2% from 2009- reader can see the individual facilities ranked in descending order of 2014 and the average carbon footprint improved 27.4% over the same on-site Energy Use Intensity (EUI), plus an indication of each facility’s period. annual carbon footprint and a profile of what times of year are most (and least) energy intensive. Summary charts provide insights into the energy use of each municipal facility type.

ENERGY STAR Ratings: The ENERGY STAR rating system is designed for 1 Includes 464 facilities; excludes Airport. See page 8 for details on on-site EUI. commercial buildings, so only some municipal facility types are eligible 2 See page 14 for details on carbon footprint calculation. The same (most current) emissions factors are used for all years, for consistency. 5

Making Use of the Results Calendar Year 2014 Highlights:

The findings suggest that San Francisco’s municipal buildings overall  Benchmarking results are provided for 465 SF city facilities across 30 continued to perform well in 2014. However, the results in this report are facility types. just a first step. The wide variation in energy performance within most  Across the portfolio, there were significant drops in both Energy Use facility types suggests there are still many opportunities for improvement. Intensity (EUI) and GHG emissions from 2013 to 2014.  The overall EUI of municipal buildings has improved 16.2% over the last This Energy Benchmarking Report forms one part of efforts by the SFPUC five years, while the average carbon footprint has decreased by 27.4% and other departments to track and improve the energy efficiency of over the same period. municipal buildings. This annual report is one of the tools guiding the  While warmer weather certainly play ed a role in the significant drop in SFPUC Power Enterprise’s ongoing energy efficiency programs. The Power natural gas use seen in 2014, many energy efficiency projects, Enterprise offers a range of energy efficiency services such as energy programs, and improvements were also at play. audits and green building commissioning that can identify technical  87% of ENERGY STAR rated facilities outperformed the national median (ratings 50-100). deficiencies and recommend operations and maintenance  School facilities performed particularly well in 2014, with 75 total improvements. In total, SFPUC Power has spent nearly $3M in calendar schools in the top 25% for ENERGY STAR ratings (75-100) compared to year 2014 on these energy efficiency measures. Furthermore, the role of their national peers. building occupants in using energy wisely is also crucial.  About 66% of the overall energy drop (excluding SFO) in 2014 was due to natural gas reductions at SFUSD locations. Another 25% of this was Developing this annual report continues to be a major undertaking due to reductions in natural gas at SFGH. supported by numerous departments. Each department can look in more detail at facilities that appear as outliers in the data and provide data improvements where necessary to improve the benchmarking process in future years. The SFPUC is hopeful that the format of this report provides value to municipal building owners, managers, occupants, and the general public, and welcomes suggestions about how to improve this report in future years. Please email any questions or suggestions to: [email protected].

Introduction With support from 25 other departments and agencies that own or lease full buildings, the SFPUC has issued this report to provide San Francisco’s The City and County of San Francisco is strongly committed to reducing agencies and the general public a better understanding of how the City’s its impact on the environment and its contributions to climate change. municipal facilities perform. This report identifies high performing Through key policy documents including the Climate Action Plan and the buildings as well as opportunities for improvement, and is an attempt by Electricity Resource Plan, the City has laid out strategies to achieve its the City to lead by example and provide transparency related to ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals. government operations.

One of the actions San Francisco is taking in support of those The information in this report is just a first step. Together with the more commitments is to reduce the energy consumption of public buildings. detailed information gained from energy audits and the in-depth San Francisco’s public buildings obtain their electricity from the City’s knowledge of building owners and occupants, this report will help City GHG-free Hetch Hetchy Power system, and stewardship of this public departments target resources to locations that could benefit the most resource demands that the City make the most efficient use of energy. from energy-related improvements. These buildings also consume natural gas and steam, contributing to climate change.

The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) has offered energy efficiency services to its power customers for the past three decades. Combined with the efforts of individual departments, these energy improvements in existing buildings save the City millions of dollars per year in energy costs while also improving the indoor environment for building occupants. Additionally, as public facilities are built or undergo major renovations, they must meet the energy performance and LEED Gold standards of the City’s Green Building Ordinance and Environment Code Chapter 7.

To most effectively take action, building owners and occupants need to be informed of cost-effective opportunities for energy savings. With this in mind, the Board of Supervisors approved the San Francisco Existing Commercial Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance in February 2011, amending the Environment Code. The ordinance requires owners of non- residential buildings larger than 10,000 square feet (both privately and municipally owned) to annually disclose their buildings’ energy performance by benchmarking against similar facilities.

This report includes more facilities than required by the ordinance. Although the ordinance only requires benchmarking buildings larger than 10,000 square feet, this municipal report includes buildings of smaller size where a meaningful benchmark could be established. The smallest buildings—park restrooms and kiosks, for example—are excluded. Also, this report includes numerous buildings owned by the City outside of the geographic boundaries of San Francisco, as well as some privately owned buildings that are occupied in full by City departments. San Francisco’s ordinance, like those in other cities, identifies the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager tool as the preferred method of benchmarking for private-sector buildings. As a well- recognized national rating tool that draws on the best available energy use data, Portfolio Manager (and the associated ENERGY STAR rating system) is a widely accepted way for owners and occupants of eligible facilities to see how their buildings stack up against local and national peers. Eligible buildings can receive a 1-100 score (with 50 being the median and 100 the best) that compares a structure’s energy performance to similar buildings nationwide, taking climate differences between regions into account. San Francisco’s Approach to Benchmarking Although some facility types in this report are eligible for a 1-100 rating (see In 2011, San Francisco joined a growing number of cities that had adopted Figure 2), the bulk of the City’s municipal buildings—the libraries, fire ordinances requiring building owners to benchmark and publicly disclose the stations, museums, recreation centers, etc.—are benchmarked on the basis energy performance of their facilities each year. Energy benchmarking is of on-site Energy Use Intensity (EUI), a measure of annual energy use per simply a way to track the performance of a building over time and compare square foot of building area. The resulting EUI for each facility is then that building to other similar structures, in order to help identify opportunities compared to the EUI of other San Francisco municipal buildings of a similar for improvement. type. While national average EUI figures are published for a variety of building types, these figures are not normalized for climate and thus are not While the concept of energy benchmarking is simple, the undertaking of an ideal method of understanding how well a building in San Francisco accurately performing this process for San Francisco’s hundreds of municipal performs. A building in San Francisco’s mild climate would tend to perform buildings continues to be relatively complex. As the City’s public electricity relatively well compared to its national peers on the basis of EUI, without provider, the SFPUC has opted to coordinate the required data gathering revealing much about the building’s actual energy efficiency. effort and publish a consolidated annual report for all City departments. This fourth annual report builds upon the previous three years’ efforts, while Another decision is the use of “on-site” rather than “source” EUI as the continuing to maintain a large body of benchmarked facilities with accurate primary metric in this report, due to the City’s source of electricity. To derive energy data. Over the past four years, SFPUC staff has worked with source EUI, the EPA’s Portfolio Manager tool uses national averages to representatives of 26 different departments to gather, verify, and update the convert electricity used in a facility to the total energy required to supply this facility data necessary for this report. electricity. In most cases, electricity delivery involves substantial conversion losses through the burning of fossil fuel, plus some losses due to 8 transmission and distribution of the resulting power.3 However, the SFPUC’s Figure 2: ENERGY STAR eligibility of facility types Hetch Hetchy Power system and some local distributed generation provide nearly all of the electricity needed by San Francisco’s municipal buildings. San Francisco municipal facility types eligible for ENERGY STAR rating: Since these power sources do not involve converting fossil fuels to electricity, K-12 School use of a national average site-source ratio would be misleading. Therefore, Mental Health Center (Medical Office) all comparisons in this report (with the exception of ENERGY STAR ratings) Hospital are based on site energy use. General Office Courthouse While this benchmarking report is one tool to identify energy efficiency Warehouse opportunities, there are other efforts to track and report the energy efficiency Wastewater Treatment Plant of the City’s buildings. Some City departments (e.g. the Real Estate Division and the California Academy of Sciences) were already using Portfolio San Francisco municipal facility types not eligible for rating: Manager to benchmark specific facilities prior to the requirements of the new Convention Center ordinance. Also, the SFPUC has distributed quarterly Energy Usage Reports to Performance Hall every department for several years, giving its electricity customers information about fluctuations in energy use for each of their sites. The Art/Cultural Center SFPUC and other departments have also annually contributed energy data Museum for every City facility as part of the Climate Action Plan process coordinated Childcare / Teen Center by the Department of the Environment. College / Adult Education Library It is the SFPUC’s hope that the format of this report is helpful to City Homeless Service departments and other readers as a way to supplement and improve upon Medical Clinic other information sources about San Francisco’s municipal sustainability Veterinarian performance. As changes are made to the EPA’s ENERGY STAR system, and Parking Garage as San Francisco’s private sector buildings have begun to release their own Fire Station energy performance data, the SFPUC will look for ways to further refine its Police Station benchmarking methods to improve the accuracy and relevancy of its Emergency Center reporting and to help lead the way in improving access to energy data in San Jail / Correctional Francisco and the nation. Clubhouse Recreation Center Swimming Pool Camp Other Recreational Building

Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair Other Shop Transit Station Airport 3 Portfolio Manager uses an average site-source ratio of 3.34 to estimate these losses. 9

Energy Use in San Francisco’s Municipal Buildings In some cases, facilities contain more than one space type. For instance, the Hall of Justice is a mixed-use facility that contains offices, a Information Sources and Assumptions courthouse, and jail areas. Where this would affect the ENERGY STAR rating, multiple space types were entered into EPA’s Portfolio Manager. Creating an accurate energy performance benchmark of San Francisco’s municipal buildings requires information from numerous sources. Departments also supplied the SFPUC with the size of parking garages and parking lots. Where attached parking would affect the ENERGY STAR rating Energy data: Electricity, natural gas, and steam data is stored in the SFPUC’s of a facility, this data was entered into Portfolio Manager as an additional energy accounting database, which contains metered monthly usage for all space type. The EUI calculations in this report include parking garage area utility meters where billing is managed by the SFPUC. as part of a facility’s square footage, which in most cases decreases the reported EUI of a building due to the lower energy intensity of a typical Some additional natural gas data was obtained from other sources, in parking garage. However, the area of parking lots is not included in the EUI cases where the site pays PG&E directly for natural gas and the meter calculations. information was provided by the individual department to the SFPUC. Natural gas data for SFUSD facilities was provided by SFUSD. There are 15 Civic Center steam loop: Two historic Civic Center buildings obtain steam facilities where some energy use data is missing (see page 32).4 from the NRG Energy Center steam loop but do not have individual steam meters: Bill Graham Civic Auditorium and the DPH Central Office at 101 Facility data: Accurate facility data is needed to reliably benchmark a Grove. To estimate the EUI of these buildings, the unmetered portion of building. As part of the initial report (calendar year 2011), the SFPUC and Civic Center steam use was apportioned to the two buildings based on other departments engaged in a thorough verification process to review their square footage. These buildings are not eligible for an ENERGY STAR available building and operations data and supply additional detail for the rating due to the absence of accurate steam meter data. benchmarking effort. Similar verification occurred for facilities added to the 2012, 2013, and 2014 reports, and several departments were also asked Snapshot of Energy Use Intensity to provide any updates for locations that were previously included. For a description of this process, see the inset on page 13. In calendar year 2014, the overall Energy Use Intensity (EUI) of the 464 benchmarked facilities (excluding the Airport)5 was 65.9 kBtu of on-site This report generally refers to “facilities” rather than “buildings”, because energy per square foot of building area.6 This was an improvement of 9.9% in many cases energy meters are shared by multiple buildings. These from the 2013 EUI of 73.12 and an improvement of 16.2% since 2009. locations are benchmarked as campuses. For instance, the Airport is listed as one facility, but contains 70 individual buildings. San Francisco General Hospital is benchmarked as one facility but is a campus of more than 15 individual buildings. Similarly, Moscone Center North and South are considered a campus with shared mechanical systems, as are the War Memorial Veterans Building and Opera House. 5 The overall EUI comparisons provided in the report exclude the Airport, due to its large size and lack of building-level meter detail. Additionally, some Airport natural gas data prior to 2011 is not available to the SFPUC. 6 The site EUI figures in this report are not weather normalized to account for 4 Excluded are any amounts of fuel oil that may be burned in several dual-fuel year-to-year fluctuations in the number of heating and cooling degree days. The boilers, to ensure readiness in case of a natural gas curtailment event. ENERGY STAR ratings, where available, are weather normalized. 10

Figure 3: Energy Use in Municipal Facilities, Calendar Year 2014

The buildings benchmarked in this report represent almost 75.8% of the electricity, natural gas, and district steam used in San Francisco’s municipal facilities in calendar year 2014. Shown in dark green, these 465 facilities (including San Francisco International Airport) used a total of 3,646,681 MMBtu of on-site energy. This report also provides partial benchmark results for an additional 5.7% of municipal facility energy use, though these facilities cannot be accurately benchmarked on a per-square-foot basis. 18.3% of the on-site energy used in municipal facilities is excluded from this report, as indicated. [Note that the figure for the Port is a partial total that excludes natural gas.]

Streetlights SFPUC Non-Building 2.0% 4.1% Other Non-Building Excluded Departments Not Covered By SFMTA Non-Building 0.7% (non building or inactive) Ordinance 5.9% Inactive Buildings or Not Covered By SF Housing Authority Ordinance (Includes estimated gas use) 0.6% 1.4%

Other Benchmarked Buildings (ENERGY 0.7% STAR Rated) 367,614 MMBtu Reporting Independently 7.6% of energy use Port of San Francisco 3.2% of energy use (includes electricity only) Benchmarked Facilities (Including Airport) 3,646,681 MMBtu Partial Benchmark 75.8% of energy use 5.7% of energy use Benchmarked Buildings (EUI Only) Buildings of Unknown Size 1,820,876 MMBtu 0.1% 37.9% of energy use

Buildings With Incomplete Airport Meter Data 1,458, 191 MMBtu 0.5% 30.3% of energy use Water and Wastewater Treatment Buildings 5.1%

Libraries Performance Halls Libraries Museums and Art Performance Health & Human Health & Human 610,708 sq.ft. 59,100 MMBtu 39,175 MMBtu 1,223,551 sq.ft. Halls Services Services 1.3% Museums and Art 1.6% 1.1% 2.5% 1,061,450 sq.ft. 365,519 sq.ft. 40,072 MMBtu 195,424 MMBtu Recreation 2.2% 0.7% 1.1% 5.4% Facilities Transit Stations 1,310,287 sq.ft. 363,000 sq.ft. Recreation Transit Stations 2.7% 0.7% Facilities 20,465 MMBtu 114,207 MMBtu 0.6% Public Safety 3.1% 1,601,103 sq.ft. 3.3% Public Safety Convention 134,199 MMBtu Centers 3.7% 2,071,000 sq.ft. Airport 4.2% 15,579,508 Convention Airport 1,458,191 sq.ft. Centers 31.9% 147,373 MMBtu MMBtu Hospitals 4.0% 40.0% 2,088,030 sq.ft. Hospitals 4.3% 589,557 MMBtu Service, Repair, 16.2% Service, Repair, Offices and Storage and Storage 4,180,282 sq.ft. 147,498 MMBtu 2,741,929 sq.ft. 8.6% 5.6% 4.0% Education Education 10,288,584 Offices 407,943 MMBtu Parking Garages sq.ft. 251,812 MMBtu 11.2% 5,285,430 sq.ft. 21.1% 6.9% 10.8%

Parking Garages 41,665 MMBtu 1.1% Figure 4: Benchmarked Energy Use, by Building Figure 5: Benchmarked Square Footage, by Category Building Category (Calendar Year 2014 Benchmarked Energy Use = 3,646,681 MMBtu) (Total Benchmarked Building Area = 48,770,381 sq ft)

Comparing the two charts above (Figures 3 and 4), some building types (EUI of only 7.9). Museums have a higher than average EUI (likely due to consume energy out of proportion to their size. For instance, the two unique climate control needs), while schools on average are less energy hospitals comprise only 4.3% of the benchmarked square footage, but intensive (partly due to the school calendar, along with energy efficiency consumed 16.2% of benchmarked energy in 2014 (EUI of 282.4). This is programs, such as summer shutdown). The average EUI figure for each largely due to the hospitals’ operating hours and intensity of use, as well building type is found in the next section of the report. as ongoing construction at SF General Hospital. On the other hand, parking garages (which are unheated) make up 10.8% of benchmarked Municipal facilities use GHG-free SFPUC electricity, natural gas supplied square footage but used only 1.1% of the year’s benchmarked energy use by PG&E or an aggregator (either the California Department of General 12

Services or SPURR), and steam supplied by NRG. To compare these forms of on-site energy use, units have been converted throughout this Sources and Verification of Facility Data report to British thermal units (Btu) of energy.7 The charts below (Figure 6) show the different energy sources used at the 464 benchmarked To develop a list of facilities, SFPUC staff began with a list of over 1,000 facilities plus the Airport, as well as the total associated greenhouse gas individually metered municipal facilities in the Power Enterprise energy accounting database, and cross-referenced this data with databases of emissions.8 owned and leased facilities maintained by the City’s Real Estate Division and Figure 6 Capital Planning Committee. Energy Use and GHG Emissions, By Fuel Type Next, the SFPUC screened out facilities owned by agencies not covered by the ordinance, such as the Housing Authority. The Port of San Francisco, which (Benchmarked Facilities Only) maintains its own facility records and natural gas use data, will independently report its energy performance data.

District Steam(Calendar Year 2014 BenchmarkedDistrict Energy Steam Use = 3,646,681 MMBtu Of the 90 facility categories in the database, those that did not meet the 62,146,300 lbs 6,184 tons CO definition of “building” were also screened out. These included bridges, bus 2 Electricity 74,203 MMBtu 7% of emissions stops, fire pumps, sirens, street lights, traffic signals, water pumps, etc. While 0 tons CO 2% of energy use 2 extremely small buildings such as park restrooms and kiosks were excluded 0% of emissions from the report, numerous other buildings smaller than the ordinance’s 10,000 square foot threshold were included where they provided a meaningful comparison to other buildings.+

To maximize the accuracy of the facility list used in the initial 2011 report, the SFPUC displayed all known facility data in a web-based survey tool and asked Natural Gas each department to verify its list of facilities and the associated data. The 13,950,956 therms Electricity 1,395,096 MMBtu 638,128 MWh SFPUC supplied a list of meters associated with each facility, for each 38.3% of energy use 2,177,686 MMBtu department to correct meter matchups if necessary. 59.7% of energy use Natural Gas Representatives from the 26 affected departments have verified the data and 81,613 tons CO 2 provided corrections and missing information when requested to do so by 93% of emissions SFPUC. Data verified includes building square footage, number of building occupants, operating hours, year built (and renovated), and other ENERGY

STAR facility characteristics depending on building type.

The SFPUC and other Departments were able to verify most facility data. 7 Conversion factors are those referenced by EPA’s ENERGY STAR Portfolio Square footage information and partial meter data from a small fraction of Manager: (3.412 kBtu per kWh; of electricity 100 kBtu per therm of natural gas; relevant facilities is still unknown. A “partial benchmark” of those facilities is 1.194 kBtu per lb of district steam). 1 MMBtu = 1,000 kBtu = 1,000,000 Btu. included in the report, and an effort will be made to obtain the missing data in 8 GHG emissions from SFPUC electricity are zero for 2014. Natural gas emissions future years. use national averages cited by ENERGY STAR (11.7 lbs CO2 per therm of natural gas). Steam emissions provided by NRG (0.199 lbs CO2 per pound of steam).

2014 Energy Benchmarking Results under construction for an extended period of time during 2013 or 2014, a note (4) is included after the facility name. Energy Use Intensity (EUI) for all Facilities ENERGY STAR Ratings As described previously, the primary method of benchmarking the Since the ENERGY STAR rating system was developed primarily for facilities in this report is to compare the on-site annual Energy Use commercial buildings, the majority of municipal buildings in San Intensity (EUI) of each facility to other San Francisco municipal facilities of Francisco are building types that are not eligible for a 1-100 rating. the same type. By listing the facilities of each type in descending order of However, of the 465 municipal facilities benchmarked in this report, 132 EUI, the reader can quickly see which facilities consumed the most of them do have building characteristics and available data that make energy per square foot, and which consumed the least. While the charts them eligible for an ENERGY STAR 1-100 rating. For these buildings, the on the far right-hand side of pages 17-32 show the total energy use for SFPUC used the EPA’s Portfolio Manager system to generate ratings that each facility, the primary comparison is on a per-square-foot basis. allow a comparison to national averages. Unlike the EUI data, these This EUI comparison is helpful, but not perfect. The wide variation in ratings take into account local climate and weather conditions, as well as energy performance within many facility types indicates the potential for building characteristics such as weekly operating hours and number of energy efficiency retrofit projects at the most energy intense locations. occupants. However, each department should look in more detail at the list of its In general, seven types of San Francisco municipal facilities fall into a buildings to help interpret the results. For example, some facilities have category eligible for an ENERGY STAR rating: Office buildings, energy meter arrangements that do not correspond to discrete buildings Courthouses, Mental Health Centers (Medical Office), Hospitals, (e.g. locations in Golden Gate Park and other Recreation & Park Warehouses, K-12 Schools, and Wastewater Treatment Plants. Of the clubhouses and playgrounds), which means the EUI for some facilities facilities in appropriate categories, some did not qualify for a rating includes energy use from adjacent areas as well. because they did not meet ENERGY STAR’s minimum operating To help track changes in energy use over time, a comparison to calendar thresholds (for instance, the buildings were too small or did not have any year 2013 EUI is included for each site. This comparison is also not full-time occupants). The ratings for these non-qualifying facilities are perfect—it is not adjusted to account for fluctuations in weather or listed as “N.Q.” along with explanations. Several other locations are changes in occupancy or operations—but does provide informative qualifying building types but the SFPUC did not have adequate data to results. In cases where the SFPUC was aware that a facility was vacant or generate an accurate rating.

San Francisco Facilities in ENERGY STAR Categories: Comparison to National Median Rating General Medical K-12 # of Rated % of Rated Office Courthouse Office Warehouse School Facilities Facilities Top 25% (75-100 rating) 11 1 2 1 75 90 68.2% 2nd Quarter (50-74 rating) 7 3 1 14 25 18.9% 3rd Quarter (25-49 rating) 3 1 9 13 9.8% Bottom 25% (0-24 rating) 1 3 4 3.0% TOTAL: 22 1 5 3 101 132 100.0% 14

As shown in Figure 7, almost 70% of rating-eligible facilities (90 out of In addition to these partially benchmarked buildings, there are notes (#) 132) achieved a preliminary score in the top 25% of similar buildings beside the names of some facilities. These notes clarify situations where nationwide, and therefore appear qualified to receive the ENERGY STAR energy or facility data is treated as a special case, or where facilities need label for calendar year 2014.9 87% of rating-eligible San Francisco further investigation in future years. Several facilities that were under facilities performed equal to or better than the national median for similar construction or that had irregular natural gas billing were treated as one buildings. Only four facilities rated in the bottom 25% compared to similar of these special cases. For a key to these notes, see Appendix A. buildings nationwide. Individual ratings for these facilities can be seen in the charts on the following pages, grouped by facility type.

Carbon Footprint SFUSD Energy Efficiency Improvements

The GHG emissions of each facility (on a per square foot basis) is One example of effective energy management this past year was provided to help integrate this benchmarking report with the City’s annual demonstrated by SFUSD. SFUSD has been proactive in reducing utility Climate Action Plan reporting. The average 2014 carbon footprint of the use through data analysis and behavior change. The District actively benchmarked facilities (4.12 pounds of CO2 emissions per square foot) monitors their utility usage so leaks or energy waste that would otherwise improved 15.9% from 2013 and 27.4% compared to 2009. While this is go unchecked are dealt with promptly. In addition, the District runs a very significant drop, calendar year 2014 was one of the hottest on Shared Savings program, which encourages and incentivizes schools to record, leading to a drop in natural gas usage for heating. This combined reduce the utility bill at their site. The program helps an appointed with more efficient systems and management, especially by SFUSD, led “Champion” (usually a teacher) implement energy and water conservation to such a significant drop in the city’s carbon footprint in 2014. measures. In return for their efforts, schools receive half of the savings they generate and the Champion gets a stipend. Each year, the Shared One key difference between the buildings in this report and their national Savings program has been improved to offer more resources and reach counterparts is that electricity in San Francisco municipal buildings is more schools. This year, the school district hired a Conservation Manager GHG-free electricity from the SFPUC’s Hetch Hetchy Power system. This to reach twice the number of schools. It has also launched an initiative to difference is not taken into account by the ENERGY STAR ratings, thus shut down heating during the summer. Much of the energy and carbon becomes an additional lens with which to view the relative performance savings by municipal buildings this past year was a result of significant of the facilities in this report. Emissions factors used in this report are drops in gas use by SFUSD buildings, which demonstrates the impact explained on the next page. properly implemented energy efficiency programs can have.

Data Uncertainties and Exceptions

As described in the previous section of this report, a small number of facilities received a “partial benchmark” due to missing square footage or meter information. These facilities are listed separately (see page 32).

9 Ratings for calendar year 2014 were obtained in October 2015. To obtain the ENERGY STAR label, the building owner must have the results validated by a licensed engineer or architect, and submit a formal application to the EPA. 15

Each facility’s preliminary 2014 ENERGY STAR rating is shown here. How to Interpret Data on the Following Pages Facilities in the top 25% of similar buildings nationwide are indicated with a green dot. Facilities in the bottom 25% are indicated with a The 2014 Energy Benchmarking results are grouped by facility type, and red dot. “N/A” indicates a facility type not eligible for a rating, or provide key data points about each facility, as well as the facility’s energy that inadequate information is available. “N.Q.” indicates the facility is performance in calendar year 2014. an eligible category but does not qualify for a rating based on EPA’s operating thresholds. General category of building, corresponding Each facility’s estimated 2014 carbon footprint is shown

to energy use snapshot in previous chapter here as pounds of CO2 emissions per square foot of

Specific facility type, allowing a comparison of For each general building building area. For electricity in 2014, GHG emissions associated with SFPUC electricity were zero. Natural gas similar facilities to each other category, the average 2014 EUI of San Francisco municipal facilities emissions are derived from national averages cited by See Page 3 for a list of department is provided here. ENERGY STAR (11.7 lbs CO2 per therm of natural gas). acronyms. GHG emissions from steam provided by NRG Energy Center (0.199 lbs CO2 per pound of steam).

Performance Halls 55.7 0 25 50 75 100 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 Performance Hall - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -14.2% 55.7 4.47 Bill Graham Civic Auditorium (steam unmetered) (2) RED 1915 1989 302,250 -2.4% 66.1 N/A 8.73 Davies Symphony Hall / Zellerbach Rehearsal Hall (1) WMPAC 1980 229,500 -6.1% 52.5 N/A 2.43 War Memorial Veterans Building & Opera House WMPAC 1932 529,700 -23.9% 51.1 N/A 2.93

District steam shown in dark blue This section includes facility characteristics for each location—facility owner, year built, year renovated, Natural gas use shown in light blue and total building area in square feet. Electricity use shown in yellow The fluctuation in monthly EUI is shown throughout 2014 Energy Use Intensity (EUI) for each facility, in kBtu the calendar year, to provide a sense of the times of of total on-site energy, per square foot of building area year with highest and lowest energy use. For each facility type, the average 2014 EUI of San The change in annual EUI from 2013 to 2014 is shown in this Francisco municipal buildings is provided on the top row, column for each facility. An improvement of more than 10% is shown for comparison to individual facilities of that type. in green. An EUI increase of more than 10% is shown in red. Facilities Bars shown in this area indicate total 2014 energy use for that were unoccupied for prolonged periods during either 2013 or each facility, in MMBtu of on-site energy. Note: Chart scales 2014 are indicated with a note (4) next to the facility name. vary for different facility types.

Convention Centers 71.2 0 25 50 75 100 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 Convention Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 10.7% 71.2 3.48 Moscone Center West CFD 2002 775,000 5.9% 78.7 N/A 4.45 Moscone Center North & South (1) CFD 1981 1992 1,296,000 14.4% 66.7 N/A 2.90

Museums and Art 159.7 0 100 200 300 400 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 Art/Cultural Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -12.7% 33.4 2.22 Randall Museum RPD 1951 32,030 -7.2% 67.1 N/A 5.65 GGP -- Sharon Arts Studio (3) RPD 1888 1992 11,376 -17.4% 63.6 N/A 7.43 SOMArts Cultural Center SFAC 1906 17,844 1.6% 32.8 N/A 0.98 Harvey Milk Center for the Arts RPD 1950 2009 23,125 4.4% 30.2 N/A 1.44 Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts SFAC 1948 32,230 -25.6% 21.0 N/A 0.54 African American Art & Culture Complex SFAC 1935 34,031 -29.8% 19.6 N/A 1.15 Bayview Opera House SFAC 1888 14,000 -6.1% 8.3 N/A 0.10 Arts Commission Window Site / Gallery SFAC 1914 4,163 -33.1% 5.8 N/A 0.23 Museum - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -0.6% 179.9 9.13 California Palace of the Legion of Honor FAMSF 1924 1995 117,665 0.9% 285.3 N/A 19.41 Asian Art Museum AAM 1917 2003 185,000 -2.8% 188.5 N/A 8.85 GGP -- Conservatory of Flowers (3) RPD 1879 2003 27,900 -15.6% 179.2 N/A 20.96 De Young Museum FAMSF 2005 292,500 -1.1% 178.0 N/A 9.99 California Academy of Sciences CAS 2008 426,000 1.8% 150.2 N/A 5.16 Coit Tower RPD 1933 2012 5,687 -5.4% 51.1 N/A 0.00

Education 39.7 0 50 100 150 200 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Childcare / Teen Center / Family Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -10.4% 30.4 2.49 Argonne CDC SFUSD 2001 2,500 -10.8% 94.6 N/A 6.55 Zaida T Rodriguez Early Education SFUSD 1976 1,800 -23.0% 80.3 N/A 6.49 Earl P Mills Community Center HSA 1971 15,000 -2.7% 59.4 N/A 3.97 Junipero Serra Annex CDC SFUSD 1970 5,800 -7.9% 46.0 N/A 1.47 Noriega CDC SFUSD 1951 14,700 -9.2% 44.9 N/A 3.69 Jefferson Early Education SFUSD 1960 2,400 1.8% 44.7 N/A 3.38 John McLaren CDC SFUSD 1954 57,885 4.3% 44.6 N/A 4.44 Playmates Nursery SFUSD 1954 3,000 3.1% 35.9 N/A 2.54 Theresa Mahler CDC SFUSD 1943 5,339 -1.1% 31.3 N/A 2.07 Mission CDC SFUSD 1976 4,100 -5.7% 28.2 N/A 1.46 Commodore Stockton CDC (16) SFUSD 1924 21,255 N/A 27.2 N/A 1.12 San Miguel CDC SFUSD 1929 1953 52,545 13.3% 25.2 N/A 2.13 Sojourner Truth Child Center HSA 1971 5,184 -34.9% 24.8 N/A 2.18 Tule Elk Park CDC SFUSD 1923 32,000 -8.1% 24.2 N/A 2.14 MLK Child Care Center HSA 1971 7,409 -9.8% 22.4 N/A 2.08 Leola M Havard Early Education SFUSD 1969 74,100 -31.5% 22.1 N/A 1.94 Visitacion Valley Family Resource Center (4) RED 1940 12,000 N/A 17.8 N/A 1.72 SFUSD -- SPEd Medical Therapy Unit (Laguna) SFUSD 1972 12,400 -18.8% 12.3 N/A 0.48 Shorey Childrens Center HSA 1971 9,700 -4.5% 7.4 N/A 0.41 College / Adult Education - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -16.6% 77.3 5.22 0 30,000 60,000 90,000 120,000 SFPD Academy SFPD 1966 19,332 0.6% 159.9 N/A 13.11 GGP -- Senior Center RPD 1930 5,940 -8.5% 129.7 N/A 11.53 CCSF -- Ocean Campus CCSF 1940 931,000 -21.5% 100.4 N/A 6.71 Southeast Community Facility and Greenhouses (5) SFPUC 1986 193,400 -7.0% 92.8 N/A 9.25 CCSF -- Mission Center CCSF 1939 2005 138,129 -4.3% 78.0 N/A 4.73 CCSF -- Downtown Center CCSF 1978 86,038 -5.0% 58.4 N/A 1.91 Sheriff Community Programs / Five Keys Adult School SHF 1959 2004 10,842 -9.0% 54.3 N/A 1.68 CCSF -- Chinatown / North Beach Annex (16) CCSF 2012 29,411 N/A 45.9 N/A 2.32 CCSF -- Airport Campus (16) CCSF 1975 27,753 N/A 44.6 N/A 1.36 CCSF -- Chinatown / North Beach Center CCSF 2012 157,353 -8.6% 34.3 N/A 1.52 CCSF -- Alemany Campus CCSF 1911 26,400 -22.4% 19.2 N/A 1.11 CCSF -- John Adams Center CCSF 1911 2009 151,397 -27.2% 17.7 N/A 1.09 CCSF -- Evans Center CCSF 1984 90,000 -20.0% 17.5 N/A 0.23 0 50 100 150 200

Calendar Year 2014 EUI Carbon Year Year Building ENERGY Facility Dpt. Monthly Site Energy Change STAR Footprint Built Renov. Area (sq. ft.) Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Annual Site MMBtu Use Intensity (EUI) Since (lbs 2013 CO2/sq.ft.) 0 50 100 150 200 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 High School - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -17.1% 33.1 2.42 International Studies Academy at Enola Maxwell SFUSD 1971 108,400 34.7% 65.5 (13)(13) 5.15

School of the Arts / Academy of Arts and Sciences SFUSD 1970 209,500 -20.0% 44.1 (13)(13) 2.60 George Washington High SFUSD 1936 228,800 -18.2% 43.3 (13)(13) 3.68

Raoul Wallenberg High SFUSD 1952 62,840 -35.0% 40.8 (13)(13) 2.88 (13) Ida B Wells High SFUSD 1910 34,300 -32.3% 39.1 (13) 3.13 Gateway High / KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy (16) SFUSD 1913 143,237 N/A 37.4 N/AN/A 3.16 (13) Philip and Sala Burton High SFUSD 1963 230,000 -16.4% 37.2 (13) 2.64 Galileo High SFUSD 1924 242,400 -10.7% 35.0 (13)(13) 2.76 Hilltop County Community High / Sunshine Building SFUSD 1937 61,442 -36.7% 34.9 (13)(13) 2.60 (13) Independence High (Old Laguna Honda) SFUSD 1908 30,114 -9.5% 33.7 (13) 2.58 (13) Thurgood Marshall High SFUSD 1957 149,796 -4.7% 33.3 (13) 2.53 (13) John O'Connell High SFUSD 1999 130,091 -20.5% 31.9 (13) 1.64 (13) SF International High SFUSD 1980 33,100 -29.6% 31.9 (13) 1.48 (13) Downtown High SFUSD 1936 58,760 -23.3% 28.3 (13) 2.51 (13) June Jordan High / City Arts and Tech High SFUSD 1957 151,600 -14.4% 27.9 (13) 2.24 N/A Abraham Lincoln High (16) SFUSD 1940 330,200 N/A 26.7 N/A 1.99 (13) Mission High SFUSD 1922 225,000 -23.5% 25.0 (13) 1.63 (13) Lowell High SFUSD 1962 245,000 -20.1% 24.1 (13) 1.59 (13) Balboa High SFUSD 1928 261,700 -35.7% 19.6 (13) 1.38 Elementary / Middle School - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -23.8% 30.3 2.20 Mission Education Center Elementary SFUSD 1911 27,000 -36.2% 72.1 21 6.98 El Dorado Elementary SFUSD 1953 30,300 -29.5% 70.0 26 6.56 George Peabody Elementary SFUSD 1976 16,229 -2.3% 60.3 86 3.70 Visitacion Valley Middle SFUSD 1971 113,600 -22.1% 59.1 7 4.67 Sunset Elementary SFUSD 1951 40,150 -16.8% 57.8 40 5.51 Civic Center Secondary at John Swett Campus SFUSD 1912 29,060 10.7% 51.1 23 3.07 Robert Louis Stevenson Elementary SFUSD 1953 47,500 -21.2% 50.6 99 4.88 Paul Revere Elementary SFUSD 1928 1968 56,400 -11.8% 50.6 36 3.81 Jefferson Elementary SFUSD 1923 42,434 17.1% 50.5 39 4.32 SFUSD -- 940 Filbert St (Yick Wo Elementary) (4) SFUSD 1900 1925 37,500 N/A 49.3 N/A 4.76 Francis Scott Key Elementary SFUSD 1936 52,000 -16.6% 46.2 61 4.00 Ulloa Elementary SFUSD 1952 53,000 -12.4% 45.3 75 3.72 Jose Ortega Elementary SFUSD 1953 35,180 -37.9% 43.2 62 3.67 Clarendon Elementary SFUSD 1962 39,500 -10.4% 42.3 83 3.39 Redding Elementary SFUSD 1917 26,100 -22.8% 40.1 85 3.00 George Moscone Elementary SFUSD 1997 45,108 -11.1% 40.0 38 2.36

0 50 100 150 200 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Alamo Elementary SFUSD 1924 50,420 -16.8% 39.4 42 1.92 Claire Lilienthal (K-2 Madison Campus) SFUSD 1910 20,855 -48.4% 39.2 72 2.96 Chinese Immersion Elementary at DeAvila SFUSD 1926 58,582 20.7% 38.8 82 3.48 Rooftop Alternative (5-8 Mayeda Campus) SFUSD 1997 21,000 -22.1% 38.2 35 1.26 Argonne Elementary SFUSD 1997 52,000 -10.1% 35.5 72 2.54 Buena Vista / Horace Mann SFUSD 1924 68,000 -30.0% 35.2 95 2.74 Sunnyside Elementary SFUSD 1927 30,900 -32.2% 35.1 89 2.87 Bessie Carmichael Elementary SFUSD 2000 56,358 -13.6% 34.7 49 1.60 Dr George Washington Carver Elementary SFUSD 1974 45,500 -36.7% 34.5 47 1.07 Hillcrest Elementary SFUSD 1951 60,280 -31.2% 34.3 70 3.16 Dr William Cobb Elementary SFUSD 1923 36,246 -19.7% 34.3 70 2.42 Lakeshore Elementary SFUSD 1954 56,101 1.1% 33.6 86 2.98 E R Taylor Elementary SFUSD 1923 56,113 -16.2% 33.6 86 2.95 Everett Middle SFUSD 1926 155,370 -15.0% 33.6 65 2.83 Rosa Parks Elementary / Raphael Weill CDC SFUSD 1927 1964 66,900 -15.8% 33.4 80 2.49 Longfellow Elementary SFUSD 1960 40,500 -23.2% 33.2 83 2.45 Sheridan Elementary SFUSD 1975 46,335 -15.5% 33.1 75 2.11 Guadalupe Elementary (4) SFUSD 1922 40,777 N/A 33.0 N/A 2.05 Chinese Education Center SFUSD 1976 10,580 -12.3% 32.6 97 1.22 Malcolm X Elementary SFUSD 1957 50,800 -34.8% 32.4 80 2.60 Lawton Elementary SFUSD 1934 64,940 -23.4% 32.3 74 2.83 Bret Harte Elementary SFUSD 1954 79,000 -3.3% 31.6 76 2.49 Cleveland Elementary SFUSD 1911 34,000 -14.2% 31.3 83 2.36 New Traditions Elementary SFUSD 1924 26,300 -31.9% 31.3 98 2.36 Alice Fong Yu Elementary SFUSD 1914 59,650 -20.6% 30.8 97 2.43 Sutro Elementary SFUSD 1976 32,860 -21.9% 30.7 75 1.91 Glen Park Elementary SFUSD 1936 45,200 -11.4% 30.4 94 2.57 A P Giannini Middle (16) SFUSD 1954 136,392 N/A 30.3 98 2.59 James Denman Middle / Leadership High SFUSD 1940 150,900 -10.3% 30.3 51 1.97 SF Public Montessori Elementary SFUSD 1924 64,500 5.1% 30.3 96 2.95

Harvey Milk Civil Rights Academy SFUSD 1952 30,560 -26.3% 30.1 90 2.31 Dr Charles R Drew Elementary SFUSD 1971 55,234 -14.5% 30.1 72 1.66

West Portal Elementary SFUSD 1927 44,700 3.5% 30.0 78 2.15 Edison Charter Academy Elementary SFUSD 1927 59,200 6.4% 29.3 86 2.01

Commodore Sloat Elementary SFUSD 1977 59,200 -22.8% 29.2 84 2.07 John Muir Elementary SFUSD 1928 53,500 -30.7% 29.1 76 2.14 Rooftop Alternative (K-4 Burnett Campus) SFUSD 1952 23,300 -12.7% 29.0 95 2.53 Miraloma Elementary SFUSD 1952 51,900 -6.0% 28.4 91 2.32 Alvarado Elementary SFUSD 1926 51,700 -25.3% 27.7 97 1.92

0 50 100 150 200 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Sherman Elementary SFUSD 1928 56,200 -3.2% 27.6 95 2.38

Bryant Elementary and CDC SFUSD 1969 32,500 -32.3% 27.4 71 1.08 Cesar Chavez Elementary SFUSD 1926 49,100 -15.4% 27.1 90 1.85

Francisco Middle SFUSD 1926 104,897 -7.4% 27.1 79 2.04 Bessie Carmichael / Filipino Education Ctr (6-8) SFUSD 1975 13,654 -16.2% 27.0 88 1.25 Monroe Elementary SFUSD 1977 53,400 -26.7% 26.7 78 1.25 Marina Middle SFUSD 1936 152,900 -31.4% 26.5 83 2.30 John Yehall Chin Elementary SFUSD 1914 23,100 -28.4% 26.5 84 1.21 Dr Martin Luther King Middle SFUSD 1940 72,210 -27.7% 26.2 72 1.30 Yick Wo Elementary (4) SFUSD 1983 26,000 N/A 25.5 N/A 1.28 Roosevelt Middle SFUSD 1930 121,000 -31.9% 25.4 80 1.93 Daniel Webster Elementary SFUSD 1924 42,800 -22.4% 24.9 57 0.22 Jean Parker Elementary SFUSD 1996 46,000 -18.5% 24.7 91 1.45 Leonard R Flynn Elementary SFUSD 1926 52,700 -41.1% 23.7 91 1.44 Grattan Elementary SFUSD 1971 55,420 -14.6% 23.5 97 1.74 Presidio Middle (16) SFUSD 1930 140,000 N/A 23.3 98 1.80 SF Community School SFUSD 1911 66,900 -21.7% 23.2 98 2.10 Starr King Elementary SFUSD 1955 49,900 -32.0% 23.2 96 1.64 Tenderloin Elementary SFUSD 1998 61,569 -33.6% 23.0 77 0.78 Garfield Elementary SFUSD 1979 33,800 -26.7% 22.9 75 0.55 Lafayette Elementary (4) SFUSD 1927 54,283 N/A 22.9 97 1.51 Dianne Feinstein Elementary SFUSD 2003 62,087 -13.1% 22.9 94 1.18 Aptos Middle SFUSD 1931 168,000 -34.1% 21.9 88 1.78 Sanchez Elementary SFUSD 1927 50,500 -36.4% 20.7 95 1.42 Frank McCoppin Elementary SFUSD 1976 32,700 -16.1% 20.4 84 0.49 Spring Valley Elementary SFUSD 1912 50,400 -34.5% 20.4 99 1.22 Gateway Middle SFUSD 1908 31,121 -54.9% 19.8 98 1.42 Marshall Elementary SFUSD 1977 34,300 -20.8% 19.4 90 0.71 Claire Lilienthal (3-8 Winfield Scott Campus) (16) SFUSD 1930 34,000 N/A 19.2 N/A 1.04 Creative Arts Charter SFUSD 1962 33,117 -41.2% 18.4 100 1.10 Fairmount Elementary SFUSD 1976 60,960 -18.2% 18.2 97 0.68 Junipero Serra Elementary SFUSD 1977 34,200 -16.8% 18.1 95 0.71 Herbert Hoover Middle (16) SFUSD 1956 132,400 N/A 17.2 90 0.69 Visitacion Valley Elementary SFUSD 1936 51,400 -43.0% 17.1 97 1.17

McKinley Elementary SFUSD 1977 45,160 -16.3% 16.0 96 0.56 James Lick Middle (4) SFUSD 1932 116,000 N/A 12.1 100 0.80 Gordon J Lau Elementary (4) SFUSD 1914 1956 63,800 N/A 10.6 N/A 0.41 21

Libraries 64.1 0 50 100 150 200 0 7,500 15,000 22,500 30,000 Library - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -6.6% 64.1 2.65 Ocean View Branch Library SFPL 2000 4,794 -5.6% 148.7 N/A 2.46 Chinatown Him Mark Lai Branch Library SFPL 1921 1996 17,858 -28.7% 79.7 N/A 2.87 Bayview/Anna E. Waden Branch Library SFPL 2012 9,527 17.5% 75.7 N/A 6.81 Main Library SFPL 1996 376,000 -2.8% 71.5 N/A 3.05 Western Addition Branch Library SFPL 1966 2008 8,000 -26.2% 65.8 N/A 3.86 Noe Valley/Sally Brunn Branch Library SFPL 1916 2008 6,096 6.9% 62.8 N/A 2.82 Richmond/Milton Marks Branch Library SFPL 1914 2009 13,900 -16.2% 62.5 N/A 1.12 West Portal Branch Library SFPL 1939 2007 8,010 -19.4% 62.1 N/A 3.63 Mission Bay Branch Library SFPL 2006 7,500 0.4% 54.0 N/A ? Presidio Branch Library SFPL 1921 2011 10,205 -16.9% 53.7 N/A 3.74 Mission Branch Library SFPL 1916 1999 10,479 -5.3% 53.6 N/A 1.07 Potrero Branch Library SFPL 1951 2010 5,428 -14.7% 53.1 N/A 1.60 Ortega Branch Library SFPL 2011 9,300 -13.9% 51.7 N/A 2.55 Portola Branch Library SFPL 2009 6,427 -18.8% 47.2 N/A 1.63 Anza Branch Library SFPL 1932 2011 8,222 -13.0% 45.9 N/A 1.95 Ingleside Branch Library SFPL 2009 6,100 -22.9% 44.8 N/A 1.93 Merced Branch Library SFPL 1958 2011 5,832 -7.7% 43.9 N/A 1.50 Sunset Branch Library SFPL 1918 2007 9,434 -21.9% 42.7 N/A 0.80 Eureka Valley/Harvey Milk Branch Library SFPL 1961 2009 6,465 19.2% 42.4 N/A 1.15 North Beach Branch Library (New Location) (4) 2013 2013 8,500 N/A 41.5 N/A 2.12 Parkside Branch Library SFPL 1951 2010 6,822 -1.4% 41.3 N/A 1.80 Bernal Heights Branch Library SFPL 1940 2010 8,777 -21.0% 41.2 N/A 1.70 Park Branch Library SFPL 1909 2011 8,060 -35.1% 40.7 N/A 2.02 Visitacion Valley Branch Library SFPL 2011 9,945 -22.0% 40.6 N/A 1.62 Marina Branch Library SFPL 1954 2007 7,633 -39.6% 39.1 N/A 0.55 Glen Park Branch Library SFPL 2007 7,185 -4.3% 38.2 N/A 1.08 Excelsior Branch Library SFPL 1967 2005 8,322 -22.2% 31.5 N/A 1.56 Golden Gate Valley Branch Library SFPL 1917 2011 7,432 -16.6% 27.8 N/A 0.49 North Beach Branch Library (Old Location) (4) SFPL 1959 8,455 N/A 26.4 N/A 2.13

(Read more about the Branch Library Improvement Program and see Green Branch Report Cards at sfpl.org.)

Calendar Year 2014 EUI Carbon Year Year Building ENERGY Facility Dpt. Monthly Site Energy Change STAR Footprint Built Renov. Area (sq. ft.) Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Annual Site MMBtu Use Intensity (EUI) Since (lbs 2013 CO2/sq.ft.) Health & Human Services 109.6 0 50 100 150 200 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 Homeless Service - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -7.2% 144.8 12.86 Multi-Service Center South HSA 1924 25,600 -10.4% 249.0 N/A 22.70 Multi-Service Center North HSA 1913 37,125 -8.4% 162.3 N/A 14.40 Mission Neighborhood Resource Center HSA 1922 6,500 -7.0% 126.4 N/A 7.68 Hamilton Family Shelter HSA 1966 50,000 0.3% 80.9 N/A 7.34 Medical Clinic - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -6.9% 103.8 7.52 Chinatown Public Health Center (Health Center #4) DPH 1967 2010 22,500 43.3% 135.5 N/A 9.86 Southeast Health Center DPH 1979 2012 14,604 -7.1% 130.4 N/A 8.51 Ocean Park Health Center (Health Center #5) DPH 1967 2009 16,247 -30.7% 117.7 N/A 9.60 Castro Mission Health Center (Health Center #1) DPH 1965 2008 15,258 -7.9% 103.4 N/A 7.49 San Francisco City Clinic DPH 1930 8,000 -30.9% 102.9 N/A 7.51 Maxine Hall Health Center (Health Center #2) DPH 1966 2006 20,590 7.3% 100.4 N/A 8.24 Silver Avenue Health Center (Health Center #3) DPH 1967 2005 22,950 -9.5% 87.2 N/A 6.31 Curry Senior Service Center DPH 1930 2006 11,195 -25.5% 66.2 N/A 3.80 Potrero Hill Health Center DPH 1976 2012 8,000 -29.5% 49.1 N/A 1.83 Mental Health Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -7.4% 34.3 3.60 Sunset Mental Health Services (4) DPH 1949 1972 5,500 N/A 50.3 57 3.07 Chinatown/North Beach Mental Health Services (16) DPH 1953 1988 11,067 -8.7% 27.4 N/A ? S Van Ness Mental Health / Mission Family Center DPH 1958 14,700 -8.6% 44.8 68 2.42 South of Market Mental Health Services DPH 1956 1998 13,000 -12.3% 42.0 53 0.68 Mission Mental Health Services DPH 1943 2002 32,000 26.5% 29.1 87 0.72 Chinatown Child Development Center DPH 1950 1985 9,250 -10.3% 26.9 83 0.69 SE Child/Family Therapy Center (6) DPH 1939 1998 3,000 -20.2% 25.6 N.Q. 1.83 Veterinarian - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -18.9% 189.9 16.31 Animal Shelter ACC 1931 1989 29,500 -18.9% 189.9 N/A 16.31

Hospitals 282.4 0 100 200 300 400 0 150,000 300,000 450,000 600,000 Hospital - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -12.5% 282.4 22.99 San Francisco General Hospital DPH 1915 1976 1,370,904 -13.1% 327.1 N/A 27.18 Laguna Honda Hospital (8) DPH 1926 2010 717,126 -10.2% 196.7 N.Q. 14.99

Offices 60.2 0 75 150 225 300 0 25,000 50,000 75,000 100,000 General Office - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -7.3% 60.3 2.83 Temp Sewer Operations Office (6) SFPUC 2000 2,500 -3.1% 145.2 N.Q. 0.00 SFUSD -- Administration - Franklin (10) SFUSD 1976 78,028 4.8% 131.2 N/A 5.07 Hall of Justice (9) RED 1959 700,000 -5.9% 118.8 N.Q. 8.29 Sheriff Training Facility SHF 1963 2002 19,057 31.2% 99.4 9 5.56 Moccasin Administration Building (11) SFPUC 12,241 -16.5% 94.5 86 0.00 Enforcement Division SFMTA 1920 8,000 -14.9% 84.3 46 2.50 GGP -- McLaren Lodge and Annex RPD 1896 1950 17,252 -18.8% 82.5 63 4.69 DPH Central Office (steam unmetered) (2) DPH 1932 119,000 -10.0% 81.5 N.Q. 9.55 1650 Mission St (16) RED 1983 216,712 8.5% 34.3 N/A 0.87 1660 Mission St RED 1990 90,619 -5.3% 70.5 51 2.37 CHN Headquarters DPH 1923 1993 60,000 -22.1% 66.5 66 3.37 Women's Resource Center SHF 1959 5,920 -5.8% 65.1 29 4.37 SFFD - Headquarters SFFD 1912 1999 50,000 4.1% 63.9 67 2.19 SFUSD -- Student Nutrition Services (10) SFUSD 1932 9,900 -7.3% 61.7 N/A 5.33 1680 Mission St DPW 1923 41,200 -11.5% 61.1 80 3.19 SFUSD -- Academics and Professional Development (10)SFUSD 1973 23,400 -27.1% 59.9 N/A 2.60 Investigations -- 160 South Van Ness HSA 1936 2002 14,219 -10.3% 57.1 65 0.98 SFPUC -- 525 Golden Gate Ave (4) SFPUC 2012 277,511 0.7% 54.1 92 0.84 GGP -- Park Aid Station / Natural Areas Program (6) RPD 1902 2012 2,733 -27.3% 53.9 N.Q. 3.61 Social Services -- 1235 Mission HSA 1935 124,219 -5.4% 53.5 83 0.99 SFUSD -- School Health Programs (10) SFUSD 1950 13,900 -8.9% 53.5 N/A 3.10 30 Van Ness Ave RED 1965 180,939 -21.6% 53.1 72 0.68 Library Support Services Building SFPL 1925 2001 43,182 -4.5% 53.0 79 2.76 25 Van Ness Ave RED 1913 1985 130,000 -2.5% 49.7 77 0.38 One South Van Ness (OSVN) RED 1959 1989 655,000 0.3% 46.2 84 1.28 SFUSD -- Children's Center Administration Building (10)SFUSD 1930 20,000 -35.4% 43.0 N/A 3.97 MediCal -- 1440 Harrison HSA 1921 52,200 -0.7% 42.7 91 1.27 Former Gloria R Davis Middle SFUSD 1976 60,700 -19.7% 42.5 N/A 3.13 CCSF -- Administrative Offices (10) CCSF 1949 1971 50,521 -10.0% 41.1 N/A 2.82 Human Services Agency Headquarters HSA 1979 171,385 -36.3% 40.8 89 0.69 City Hall RED 1915 2000 516,484 -10.8% 39.4 (13) 0.99 Seneca First Stop Visit Cntr/Workforce Development HSA 1947 8,100 -3.5% 39.2 69 1.74 Airport Reprographics SFO 1967 6,000 -4.6% 37.8 37 0.50 SFUSD -- Irving M Scott Building SFUSD 1895 12,300 -10.2% 36.7 N/A 2.98 Public Defender's Office RED 1985 52,000 2.5% 33.1 86 0.27 SFUSD -- Administration - Van Ness (10) SFUSD 1927 241,956 1.1% 23.0 N/A 2.00 SFUSD -- 3045 Santiago Admin Building (4) SFUSD 1954 15,334 N/A 22.9 N/A 1.44 Bayside Office Space and Warehouse SFPUC 1978 50,593 36.5% 15.0 N.Q. 0.04 35/45 Onondaga Building (4) (12) DPH 1928 1932 8,747 N/A 7.6 N.Q. 0.53 Courthouse - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -30.2% 41.7 2.37 Community Justice Center DPH 1913 18,430 -30.2% 41.7 80 2.37 24

Public Safety 82.6 0 75 150 225 300 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Fire Station - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -3.8% 62.3 4.67 Fire Station 35 (Fire Boat House) SFFD 1908 1994 4,712 -2.1% 194.2 N/A 8.52 Fire Fighting Training Center - Treasure Island SFFD 5,040 47.9% 150.6 N/A 0.00 Fire Station 34 SFFD 1929 1998 4,400 -11.9% 123.7 N/A 10.09 Fire Station 22 SFFD 1962 5,900 -6.3% 122.1 N/A 11.22 Fire Station 20 SFFD 1963 1997 10,300 -8.1% 101.0 N/A 9.45 Fire Station 16 SFFD 1938 1998 14,000 -2.9% 94.5 N/A 9.69 Fire Station 11 SFFD 1956 1996 14,000 0.6% 94.5 N/A 8.90 Fire Station 06 SFFD 1948 1998 13,500 4.1% 94.3 N/A 8.85 Fire Station 15 SFFD 1957 1997 12,138 2.3% 94.0 N/A 6.74 Fire Station 31 SFFD 1913 8,500 -11.6% 91.3 N/A 7.29 Fire Station 29 SFFD 1956 1996 8,300 -15.4% 88.6 N/A 8.05 Fire Station 43 SFFD 1970 1995 10,800 -19.0% 87.8 N/A 6.31 Fire Station 19 SFFD 1951 1998 11,500 -9.8% 87.5 N/A 8.28 Fire Station 05 SFFD 1954 1984 12,600 -8.3% 85.8 N/A 7.68 Fire Station 10 SFFD 1956 14,300 0.7% 84.9 N/A 7.87 Fire Station 21 SFFD 1958 1988 8,000 -11.2% 80.4 N/A 7.56 Fire Station 38 SFFD 1960 13,400 1.6% 80.0 N/A 7.35 Fire Station 17 SFFD 1955 1996 12,100 -2.3% 79.1 N/A 6.42 Fire Station 01 (4) (16) SFFD 2013 15,136 N/A 75.6 N/A 2.86 Fire Station 40 SFFD 1931 1995 7,350 1.7% 74.6 N/A 4.70 Fire Station 13 SFFD 1974 1999 18,790 -16.2% 74.0 N/A 3.95 Fire Station 07 / Division of Training SFFD 1953 2003 33,600 -7.8% 67.8 N/A 5.48 Fire Station 12 SFFD 1955 11,300 -9.3% 65.1 N/A 5.58 Fire Station 37 SFFD 1915 1990 6,950 -8.8% 62.0 N/A 4.62 Fire Station 08 SFFD 1940 1994 8,000 -3.3% 61.0 N/A 3.51 Fire Station 41 SFFD 1956 9,600 -1.3% 58.5 N/A 5.23 Fire Station 39 SFFD 1923 1998 8,450 -12.6% 58.3 N/A 4.98 Fire Station 32 SFFD 1941 1991 10,900 -11.0% 55.4 N/A 4.98 Fire Station 24 SFFD 1914 1997 7,600 4.4% 54.0 N/A 3.80 Fire Station 25 SFFD 1916 11,420 6.7% 53.6 N/A 3.69 Fire Station 23 SFFD 1959 1996 12,000 3.5% 52.6 N/A 4.88 Fire Station 33 SFFD 1973 1998 5,900 -17.0% 52.0 N/A 2.89 Fire Station 03 SFFD 1973 8,000 -2.4% 51.9 N/A 2.60 Fire Station 42 SFFD 1979 1998 9,300 7.5% 44.5 N/A 2.88 Fire Station 02 SFFD 1994 16,920 2.1% 42.9 N/A 2.13 Fire Station 26 SFFD 1968 1997 15,000 -17.1% 42.4 N/A 3.37 Fire Station 09 SFFD 1972 1995 21,400 -2.2% 41.5 N/A 2.74 25

Calendar Year 2014 EUI Carbon Year Year Building ENERGY Facility Dpt. Monthly Site Energy Change STAR Footprint Built Renov. Area (sq. ft.) Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Annual Site MMBtu Use Intensity (EUI) Since (lbs 2013 CO2/sq.ft.) 0 75 150 225 300 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Fire Station 14 SFFD 1973 15,900 0.3% 35.9 N/A 1.87 Fire Station 49 SFFD 1958 2002 75,000 -0.6% 12.6 N/A 0.43 Fire Station 48 - Treasure Island SFFD 15,000 -72.8% 8.3 N/A 0.37

0 75 150 225 300 0 3,750 7,500 11,250 15,000 Police Station - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -8.9% 73.8 3.55 Bayview Police Station SFPD 1996 16,000 46.2% 132.5 N/A 7.47 Central Police Station SFPD 1970 8,000 -0.8% 129.5 N/A 1.52 Ingleside Police Station SFPD 1910 1990 18,500 -6.4% 114.9 N/A 8.98 Park Police Station SFPD 1910 1993 13,700 -26.6% 82.3 N/A 5.33 Taraval Police Station SFPD 1929 1994 18,070 9.4% 77.8 N/A 5.55 Northern Police Station SFPD 1988 1987 18,000 -0.6% 73.8 N/A 3.40 Mission Police Station SFPD 1994 25,000 -13.6% 66.3 N/A 2.88 SFPD Tactical Company SFPD 1941 2009 52,125 -26.8% 58.1 N/A 1.78 Richmond Police Station SFPD 1910 1993 13,000 -25.5% 45.1 N/A 1.47 Tenderloin Police Station SFPD 2000 27,500 -12.5% 39.2 N/A 1.01 Emergency Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 10.4% 232.0 9.88 Emergency Operations Center DEM 1998 2010 56,000 10.4% 232.0 N/A 9.88 0 75 150 225 300 0 15,000 30,000 45,000

Jail / Correctional - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -13.0% 90.2 6.02 Youth Guidance Center JUV 1950 2006 210,000 -6.5% 119.7 N/A 10.13 San Francisco County Jail, San Bruno Facility SHF 1934 2006 348,202 -19.8% 107.1 N/A 7.49 County Jail #1 & #2 SHF 1994 250,000 0.8% 41.8 N/A 0.51

Recreation Facilities 86.3 0 75 150 225 300 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 Clubhouse - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 10.3% 58.6 2.91 Sandy Tatum Clubhouse RPD 2005 20,000 26.7% 247.6 N/A 16.74 South Sunset Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1949 1,500 -8.0% 213.6 N/A 6.26 Youngblood Coleman Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1960 2,135 9.6% 161.9 N/A 0.40 Laurel Hill Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1953 1,134 -9.4% 133.2 N/A 14.06 James Rolph Jr Clubhouse RPD 1921 2008 2,730 -0.2% 120.3 N/A 1.74 GGP -- Golf Course Clubhouse RPD 1951 2,470 30.1% 120.0 N/A 0.00 GGP -- Stow Lake Boathouse (4) RPD 1945 4,647 18.0% 92.5 N/A 6.45 Jose Coronado Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1995 933 14.4% 90.8 N/A 0.06 Lincoln Park Golf Course RPD 1936 6,329 -3.9% 82.4 N/A 1.40 Merced Heights Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1950 1,136 -22.4% 75.2 N/A 2.35 Gilman Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1969 1,578 46.6% 73.3 N/A 0.00 Cayuga Clubhouse (4) RPD 2013 2,500 N/A 71.7 N/A 2.12 Hayes Valley Clubhouse RPD 2011 2,500 -1.3% 70.8 N/A 2.98 Helen Wills Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2005 3,082 -24.9% 68.8 N/A 5.14 Silver Terrace Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1953 7,842 4.9% 64.4 N/A 0.67 Visitacion Valley Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2003 2,600 -37.7% 61.5 N/A 5.29 Argonne Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2006 1,000 -21.1% 59.6 N/A 2.09 Fulton Clubhouse and Playground (4) RPD 1955 2012 1,420 -21.1% 56.6 N/A 3.54 Jackson Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1912 8,060 -2.5% 50.0 N/A 2.57 Margaret S Hayward Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1922 6,717 -7.6% 44.3 N/A 1.04 Christopher Clubhouse RPD 1971 2,337 2.9% 42.4 N/A 0.00 Mccoppin Square Clubhouse RPD 1955 2,000 -23.7% 41.7 N/A 2.34 Cabrillo Clubhouse (4) RPD 1931 2013 1,420 N/A 41.6 N/A 2.77 Midtown Terrace Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1961 2,176 -18.6% 41.0 N/A 3.93 Wawona Clubhouse (Project Insight) RPD 1950 1,830 -4.2% 37.7 N/A 2.84 Parque Ninos Unidos Clubhouse RPD 2004 2,414 -29.8% 35.2 N/A 2.57 Sunnyside Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1969 4,412 16.4% 29.7 N/A 2.15 J. P. Murphy Clubhouse RPD 1950 2008 1,820 22.2% 28.1 N/A 1.90 Douglas Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1926 1,072 23.3% 27.3 N/A 1.33 Lake Merced Boathouse (4) RPD 1958 2013 15,200 N/A 26.1 N/A 2.24 Sunnyside Conservatory RPD 1900 2009 1,536 -3.9% 25.9 N/A 0.00 Peixotto Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1955 2,000 -16.7% 25.0 N/A 1.97 Sigmund Stern Grove / Trocadero Clubhouse RPD 1930 2005 12,832 -3.8% 21.7 N/A 0.00 Excelsior Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1928 2,255 -27.4% 20.8 N/A 1.29 Julius Kahn Clubhouse RPD 1922 1,105 2.7% 20.6 N/A 1.42 Grattan Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1949 1,854 -13.7% 17.8 N/A 1.17 Miraloma Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1949 1,352 -4.0% 16.7 N/A 1.08 Cow Hollow Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1950 675 -31.1% 16.1 N/A 1.01 Rochambeau Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2004 1,482 -28.1% 15.9 N/A 0.62 Woh Hei Yuen Clubhouse RPD 1997 5,000 -22.0% 15.1 N/A 0.00 27

0 75 150 225 300 0 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 West Portal Clubhouse and Playground RPD 2004 2,728 -27.2% 14.7 N/A 0.38 Junipero Serra Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1955 2008 1,700 -5.6% 13.9 N/A 0.25 Richmond Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1916 1,200 -51.3% 12.8 N/A 0.96 Willie Woo Woo Wong Clubhouse RPD 1927 6,000 10.3% 12.6 N/A 0.00 West Sunset Clubhouse RPD 1953 13,530 -0.1% 9.6 N/A 0.00 Presidio Heights Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1910 958 -26.9% 8.5 N/A 0.62 Pine Lake Park Clubhouse RPD 1950 1,242 2.7% 7.6 N/A 0.00 Alice Chalmers Clubhouse RPD 1951 2,505 -37.8% 7.3 N/A 0.00 Boeddeker Park and Clubhouse (4) RPD 1989 3,740 N/A 5.9 N/A 0.00 Crocker Amazon Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1955 1982 24,040 -18.4% 5.8 N/A 0.31 Recreation Center - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -8.5% 49.8 3.31 Moscone Rec Center RPD 1924 2008 9,650 -21.0% 103.8 N/A 5.26 Joseph Lee Rec Center RPD 1950 2007 16,383 -1.1% 90.4 N/A 7.53 Minnie & Lovie Ward Rec Center RPD 2007 2008 19,461 5.1% 73.8 N/A 5.19 Potrero Hill Rec Center RPD 1950 18,805 -10.6% 69.2 N/A 6.54 Upper Noe Rec Center RPD 1950 2006 16,447 8.6% 63.5 N/A 4.60 Richmond Rec Center RPD 2000 18,470 -9.2% 61.0 N/A 3.52 GGP -- County Fair Building/Hall Of Flowers RPD 1961 1969 23,477 -0.7% 58.4 N/A 4.88 Eureka Valley Rec Center RPD 1951 2004 17,880 -46.4% 57.2 N/A 4.82 St. Mary's Rec Center and Playground RPD 1949 23,307 -9.1% 54.1 N/A 4.47 Sunset Rec Center RPD 1940 2012 16,424 -5.9% 45.1 N/A 1.94 Tenderloin Rec Center RPD 1995 10,133 -16.4% 40.7 N/A 2.58 Palega Rec Center (4) RPD 1928 2012 18,397 N/A 38.8 N/A 2.08 Bernal Heights Rec Center RPD 1932 5,008 -17.7% 34.6 N/A 2.42 Betty Ann Ong Chinese Rec Center RPD 1951 2012 24,234 -6.9% 32.1 N/A 1.62 GGP -- Model Yacht Clubhouse (3) RPD 1938 3,168 -2.6% 31.5 N/A 3.69 Mission Rec Center / Mission Arts Center RPD 1984 2012 30,850 -26.6% 29.6 N/A 0.80 Gene Friend Rec Center @ SOMA RPD 1989 16,354 -2.1% 19.2 N/A 0.50 GGP -- Kezar Pavilion RPD 1925 24,254 -7.5% 15.6 N/A 0.00

0 150 300 450 600 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 Swimming Pool - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 22.2% 294.0 25.84 Coffman Pool / Herz Clubhouse and Playground RPD 1957 2008 12,289 20.6% 456.2 N/A 41.80 Hamilton Rec Center and Pool RPD 1953 2010 16,988 N/A 431.0 N/A 34.21 Rossi Swimming Pool and Playground RPD 1958 15,162 -5.1% 411.2 N/A 42.63 Charlie Sava Swimming Pool / Larsen Park RPD 1957 2008 12,900 -7.5% 400.8 N/A 34.81 Mission Community Pool / Clubhouse (4) RPD 1916 2012 8,500 N/A 290.1 N/A 28.97 Garfield Pool and Garfield Square Clubhouse RPD 1958 21,160 -4.3% 236.3 N/A 23.03 North Beach Swimming Pool/Joe DiMaggio Playground RPD 2004 2006 16,384 -7.3% 222.9 N/A 17.70 Martin Luther King Jr Swimming Pool RPD 2001 23,851 -1.0% 220.2 N/A 15.10 Balboa Swimming Pool (16) RPD 1962 19,000 N/A 120.7 N/A 10.77 28

Calendar Year 2014 EUI Carbon Year Year Building ENERGY Facility Dpt. Monthly Site Energy Change STAR Footprint Built Renov. Area (sq. ft.) Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Annual Site MMBtu Use Intensity (EUI) Since (lbs 2013 CO2/sq.ft.) 0 150 300 450 600 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Other Recreational Buildings - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -19.1% 67.5 3.13 GGP -- Murphy MilLZright's Cottage RPD 1904 2011 2,960 3.8% 641.3 N/A 1.83 SF Zoo RPD 1930 65,799 -17.7% 293.2 N/A 15.18 GGP -- Kezar Stadium RPD 1924 5,000 2.2% 286.3 N/A 24.90 GGP -- Beach Chalet and Visitor Center RPD 1925 1996 18,045 13.3% 267.9 N/A 29.44 GGP -- Music Concourse RPD 1900 5,095 -4.0% 120.7 N/A 0.00 SFPD Pistol Range SFPD 1942 1989 10,000 -5.7% 50.9 N/A 0.42 SFPD Stables SFPD 1935 11,800 -42.0% 42.2 N/A 3.67 Candlestick Park Stadium (4) RPD 1960 500,000 N/A 28.7 N/A 0.64 GGP -- Pioneer Log Cabin RPD 1911 1931 2,256 -21.3% 28.4 N/A 0.00 GGP -- Dutch Windmill RPD 1902 2,500 -68.3% 17.4 N/A 0.00 GGP -- Bercut Equitation Field RPD 1930 20,632 -2.4% 11.0 N/A 0.00 Fay House RPD 1912 4,536 13.9% 1.3 N/A 0.00

Calendar Year 2014 EUI Carbon Year Year Building ENERGY Facility Dpt. Monthly Site Energy Change STAR Footprint Built Renov. Area (sq. ft.) Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Annual Site MMBtu Use Intensity (EUI) Since (lbs 2013 CO2/sq.ft.) 53.8 Service, Repair, and Storage 0 75 150 225 300 0 7,500 15,000 22,500 30,000 Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -10.0% 65.5 2.37 H. Hetchy-Warnerville Substation/Switchyard SFPUC 1,835 -5.1% 205.0 N/A 0.00 GGP -- Maintenance Yard and Nursery RPD 1957 43,947 -19.7% 179.3 N/A 16.61 Cable Car Barn and Power House SFMTA 1906 1984 83,741 -1.3% 158.7 N/A 0.08 Kirkland Division - Motor Coach SFMTA 1949 9,352 -15.3% 140.7 N/A 5.18 Metro East Facility - LRV SFMTA 2008 180,000 -7.1% 133.9 N/A 2.59 Millbrae Yard SFPUC 60,045 -7.0% 120.7 N/A 5.15 City Distribution Division SFPUC 67,500 -7.7% 110.4 N/A 7.20 Cameron Beach (Geneva) Yard - LRV and Streetcar SFMTA 1984 31,514 -12.9% 102.1 N/A 3.40 Woods Division - Motor Coach SFMTA 1976 161,719 -7.7% 92.6 N/A 4.17 Islais Creek - Motor Coach SFMTA 2013 16,200 8.3% 72.0 N/A 0.00 Central Shops GSA 1959 80,577 31.7% 64.0 N/A 4.15 Green Division and Annex - LRV SFMTA 1977 1983 208,371 -19.5% 53.7 N/A 0.71 1399 Marin - Maintenance Facility SFMTA 1972 25,100 -0.7% 51.4 N/A 0.00 Hall of Justice Gas Station GSA 1959 4,360 -10.6% 48.4 N/A 1.96 South Forks Maintenance Yard SFPUC 2,900 -8.1% 48.2 N/A 0.00 Flynn Division - Motor Coach SFMTA 1941 1989 268,947 -16.9% 47.8 N/A 2.04 Potrero Division - Trolley Coach SFMTA 1914 1990 101,510 -26.0% 47.3 N/A 1.74 Sunol Yard SFPUC 12,095 -0.9% 44.2 N/A 2.25 Presidio Division - Trolley Coach SFMTA 1912 158,381 -11.4% 43.5 N/A 2.48 DPW -- Corporation Yard DPW 1949 102,764 -16.1% 34.2 N/A 1.49 GGP -- San Francisco Botanical Garden (3) RPD 1955 29,763 -37.9% 22.1 N/A 2.59 Scott Division SFMTA 1990 116,144 -3.5% 16.1 N/A 0.33 Bayshore Yard and Shop SFMTA 255,420 4.5% 9.3 N/A 0.26 Other Shops - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -6.4% 25.4 0.91 SFFD - Bureau of Equipment SFFD 1918 7,000 32.6% 86.6 N/A 6.89 ReproMail RED 1935 10,469 17.7% 65.7 N/A 0.98 SFUSD -- Buildings and Grounds SFUSD 1968 40,000 -11.2% 44.8 N/A 2.72 700 Pennsylvania - Maintenance of Way SFMTA 1947 2000 99,383 -12.4% 31.1 N/A 1.03 Sustainable Streets Division SFMTA 1999 90,000 -8.4% 15.6 N/A 0.29 1401 Bryant - Overhead Lines SFMTA 1897 1979 46,000 -11.5% 12.0 N/A 0.09 Paint Shop and Vehicle Parking SFMTA 1958 35,021 31.6% 5.5 N/A 0.00 Warehouses - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 10.6% 17.0 0.36 SFUSD -- Warehouse/Transportation (10) SFUSD 1946 132,000 14.4% 25.7 N/A 0.99 651 Bryant - Power Utility Services SFPUC 1954 14,000 -21.8% 15.3 86 0.11 Brooks Hall (12) RED 1956 90,000 15.4% 15.3 N.Q. 0.00 Burke Avenue Facility - Central Warehouse SFMTA 1969 103,231 8.6% 13.6 40 0.08 Streetlight Warehouse (12) SFPUC 1988 6,400 -27.9% 10.4 N.Q. 0.00 Fine Arts Warehouse FAMSF 1983 27,440 4.6% 6.4 65 0.00 Oakdale Office/Warehouse (12) SFPUC 7,800 -1.9% 5.7 N.Q. 0.08 SFPD Storage Facility (12) SFPD 11,000 -31.1% 0.9 N.Q. 0.00 30

Calendar Year 2014 EUI Carbon Year Year Building ENERGY Facility Dpt. Monthly Site Energy Change STAR Footprint Built Renov. Area (sq. ft.) Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Annual Site MMBtu Use Intensity (EUI) Since (lbs 2013 CO2/sq.ft.) Parking Garages 7.9 0 25 50 75 100 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 Parking Garage - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -2.9% 7.9 0.00 Union Square Garage RPD 1941 423,780 -1.4% 11.8 N/A 0.00 Vallejo Street Garage SFMTA 1969 62,760 14.0% 10.9 N/A 0.00 Civic Center Garage RPD 1958 355,674 -16.9% 10.8 N/A 0.00 Portsmouth Square Garage RPD 1962 225,480 -1.8% 9.4 N/A 0.00 Sixteenth & Hoff Garage SFMTA 1996 17,284 -1.5% 9.1 N/A 0.00 SF General Hospital Garage SFMTA 1996 300,000 2.6% 8.3 N/A 0.00 Golden Gateway Garage SFMTA 1965 226,800 -2.8% 8.1 N/A 0.00 Sutter Stockton Garage SFMTA 1959 717,970 -1.4% 7.5 N/A 0.00 Fifth & Mission Garage SFMTA 1957 992,600 1.2% 7.4 N/A 0.00 St Mary's Square Parking Garage RPD 1952 245,445 5.0% 7.4 N/A 0.00 Moscone Center Garage SFMTA 1984 255,444 1.0% 7.3 N/A 0.00 Music Concourse Garage SFMTA 2005 300,000 -15.2% 7.1 N/A 0.00 Ellis O'Farrell Garage SFMTA 1964 304,520 0.2% 7.0 N/A 0.00 Mission Bartlett Garage SFMTA 1983 113,759 1.7% 6.8 N/A 0.00 Japan Center Garage - Fillmore Street Annex SFMTA 1965 59,308 5.1% 6.5 N/A 0.00 Polk Bush Garage SFMTA 1993 70,160 -23.1% 6.0 N/A 0.00 Performing Arts Garage SFMTA 1983 209,896 -9.5% 5.7 N/A 0.00 North Beach Garage SFMTA 2002 82,405 3.9% 5.7 N/A 0.00 Lombard Street Garage SFMTA 1988 71,263 7.6% 5.4 N/A 0.00 SFUSD -- 1340 Bush Garage SFUSD 1969 13,316 5.3% 5.4 N/A 0.00 Japan Center Main Garage SFMTA 1965 237,566 -0.3% 4.8 N/A 0.00

Transportation 0 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 0 25 50 75 100 Transit Station - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -2.5% 56.4 Castro Station SFMTA 1972 31,000 -0.3% 77.0 N/A 0.00 Forest Hill Station SFMTA 1918 1986 26,000 -6.0% 65.6 N/A 0.00 Embarcadero Station (14) SFMTA 1972 56,000 -3.5% 64.0 N/A 0.00 Church Station SFMTA 1972 39,000 2.1% 57.3 N/A 0.00 Powell Station (14) SFMTA 1972 59,000 -2.8% 52.1 N/A 0.00 Civic Center Station (14) SFMTA 1972 53,000 -2.5% 50.8 N/A 0.00 Van Ness Station SFMTA 1972 42,000 -3.0% 49.5 N/A 0.00 Montgomery Station (14) SFMTA 1972 57,000 -3.5% 47.5 N/A 0.00

Airport - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D 93.6 0 375,000 750,000 1,125,000 1,500,000 San Francisco International Airport (18) SFO 1954 15,579,508 -3.9% 93.6 N/A 2.49

Calendar Year 2014 EUI Carbon Year Year Building ENERGY Facility Dpt. Monthly Site Energy Change STAR Footprint Built Renov. Area (sq. ft.) Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) Annual Site MMBtu Use Intensity (EUI) Since (lbs 2013 CO2/sq.ft.) Buildings with Incomplete Meter Data 0 50 100 150 200 0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 Buildings with Incomplete Meter Data - San Francisco Average J F M A M J J A S O N D -5.6% 53.2 SFPD Building 606 Crime Lab (15) SFPD 1986 56,325 0.6% 130.3 N/A ? Mental Health Services -- 1380 Howard (16) DPH 1927 84,000 1.8% 95.3 N/A ? Fire Station 44 (4) SFFD 1915 1998 8,450 -42.8% 28.8 N/A 2.22 Fire Station 18 (16) SFFD 1951 1997 15,900 111.8% 65.9 N/A 5.79 Western Addition Community Technology Center (16) RPD 1991 4,500 -4.9% 42.0 N/A ? Camp Ida Smith SFPUC 1,200 -72.1% 3.2 N/A 0.00 Fire Station 36 (4) SFFD 1961 1996 16,100 -86.6% 6.0 N/A 0.11 Redwood Center (7) DPH 1939 11,000 -40.7% 6.3 N.Q. 0.00 Glen Park Rec Center / Glenridge Nursery School RPD 1934 22,301 195.9% 41.4 N/A 2.90 Fire Station 28 (17) SFFD 1967 1997 9,350 -13.7% 40.0 N/A 2.74 District Attorney's Office (16) DA 1906 17,625 6.7% 38.5 N/A ? Visitacion Valley CDC (16) RPD 1998 1,753 -5.5% 28.1 N/A ? Workforce Development Service Center (16) HSA 1947 2010 2,465 -16.4% 20.6 N/A ? Ella Hill Hutch Community Center (16) MOH 1980 22,300 -37.4% 19.5 N/A ? Palace of Fine Arts (4) (16) RPD 1915 2003 140,000 -37.5% 17.8 N/A ?

Buildings of Unknown Size 0 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 Camp J F M A M J J A S O N D 63.1% Camp Mather RPD 0 144.2% N/A N/A 0.00 Log Cabin Ranch Youth Guidance JUV 1953 1966 80,758 -4.5% N/A N/A 0.00

Water and Wastewater Treatment Buildings 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 Wastewater Treatment J F M A M J J A S O N D North Point Wet Weather Facility (10) SFPUC 1951 89,600 -61.6% N/A N/A N/A Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant (10) SFPUC 1993 0 34.7% N/A N/A N/A Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant (10) SFPUC 1951 1982 524,593 8.3% N/A N/A N/A Water Treatment J F M A M J J A S O N D Harry Tracy Water Filtration SFPUC 38,870 21.2% N/A N/A N/A Pulgas Dechloramination Facility SFPUC 8,000 22.8% N/A N/A N/A Rock River Lime Facility SFPUC 2,040 4.1% N/A N/A N/A San Antonio Pump Station / Sunol WTP (4) SFPUC 51,202 -25.2% N/A N/A N/A

Putting the Results in Context climate-adjusted national comparisons for additional building types such as libraries, fire stations, and museums. The data in this report provides a snapshot of energy performance in San The role of benchmarking: Benchmarking the energy use of a portfolio of Francisco’s municipal buildings during calendar year 2014. The report is buildings can help identify which buildings are outliers among their intended primarily to help inform building owners and other decision peers, and can be useful for tracking changes in energy use from year makers about where to target public resources. It also provides to year. Once outliers are identified, on-site energy audits can be information to energy efficiency researchers and the general public. As performed to identify cost-effective retrofit opportunities in a particular described below, energy benchmarking should be seen as part of a wider building. This Energy Benchmarking Report is one tool used by the array of energy efficiency strategies to reduce the City’s energy use and SFPUC to target facilities for energy efficiency improvements. The improve the operations and comfort of its public facilities. SFPUC also offers a green building commissioning program to City Limitations of report data: To make the most out of this report, City departments, which can assist with new building projects and major departments should look in more detail at facilities that appear as renovations. In addition, retro-commissioning of existing buildings can outliers in the data or the have unexpected results. For instance, a identify equipment deficiencies and recommend operations and poorly functioning HVAC system can result in large amounts of wasted maintenance improvements to save energy and improve building energy and cause an unexpectedly poor rating. On the other hand, a performance. The role of building occupants in using energy wisely is facility with a history of comfort problems may appear on paper as an also crucial, and the SFPUC is interested to work with City departments energy efficient building because the HVAC systems are not functioning. to share the results of this report with employees and other building Additionally, while the SFPUC made every effort to accurately match users to help reinforce positive changes in occupant behavior. Readers meters to facilities and also to indicate where a facility was vacant for a are encouraged to suggest improvements to the format of the report for significant period of time, readers should be aware that incomplete future years. meter matchups or changes in occupancy may skew the results for a The findings of this report suggest that San Francisco’s public buildings particular facility. As described elsewhere in this report, some types of continued to perform well in 2014, contributing toward the City’s goals facilities (e.g. park and recreational buildings) may be particularly of reducing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. The SFPUC susceptible to such meter and occupancy uncertainties. hopes that City departments and others will find this data useful in Report improvements in future years: This is the fourth year that this better understanding the energy use of municipal facilities, and that Energy Benchmarking Report has been issued for San Francisco’s this knowledge will encourage further actions to improve that municipal buildings. The content of each year’s report has been performance. improved by the suggestions and contributions of a variety of people

and departments. Still, there is room for further improvement. For the small number of buildings with incomplete meter information, the SFPUC will continue to encourage City departments to fill these gaps. The SFPUC will also continue to work with departments to improve the accuracy of meter matchups, as described above. As the EPA’s ENERGY STAR program and other national energy databases evolve, the City will seek opportunities to obtain ENERGY STAR ratings or other meaningful

APPENDIX A: the all-electric facility obtains its energy from hydropower resources in the immediate vicinity. Therefore, the conversion and transmission losses of a typical building are not applicable. Key to Benchmarking Notes (12) Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating, due to lack of full-time (1) Adjacent facilities combined for benchmarking, due to shared occupants. mechanical systems. (13) High schools that appear to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR (2) Bill Graham Civic Auditorium and DPH Central Office receive rating are indicated with green dots, and ENERGY STAR quartile steam from the Civic Center steam loop that is unmetered at results for high schools are included in the overall totals shown individual facility level. For purposes of this report, the metered on page 14 of this report. However, the 1-100 scores for use at the steam loop is apportioned based on each building’s individual high schools are not listed due to unexpectedly square footage, but may be over reported here due to leaks and positive scores. More detailed site surveys, as well as a more other losses in the steam loop itself. A steam meter was detailed assessment of the ENERGY STAR ratings for high installed at City Hall at the beginning of 2012. schools in San Francisco’s climate may be warranted. (3) Facilities in Golden Gate Park, in cases where electrical meters (14) The square footage and energy use listed for these shared specific to the facility cannot be located. stations represents the Muni portion only, excluding BART. (4) This location was under construction or vacant for an extended (15) Annual propane use at this site unknown. period of time during a portion of calendar years 2013 or 2014. (16) Irregular natural gas use. Some or all natural gas use data is (5) The metering arrangement at the SECF needs further unknown, missing, or gas meter readings may be inaccurate. investigation. Electricity and natural gas use data for the nursery (17) Irregular electricity use. Some or all electricity use data is and greenhouses may be incomplete. unknown, missing, or electrical meter readings may be (6) Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating, due to small size. inaccurate. (7) Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating for dormitories, due to (18) A significant portion of the Airport is in operation 24 hours per inadequate number of rooms. day. For EUI comparisons among facility types based on average (8) Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating for hospitals. As a long- hours of operation, see Appendix B. term care facility, Laguna Honda Hospital is not eligible for the hospital category. The square footage listed includes the new hospital buildings as of 2010 plus the square footage of old wings A, B, C, and H. The total excludes 120,000 square feet under remodel in buildings K, L, M, and O, which will be reoccupied in future years. (9) Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating, due to more than 10% of the mixed-use facility being classified as “Other” space type. (10) Facility operations data required for ENERGY STAR rating is unavailable at time of report publication. (11) The ENERGY STAR rating of the Moccasin Administration Building assumes on-site energy generation. Located at the site of the SFPUC’s Moccasin Powerhouse in Moccasin, California, 34

APPENDIX B: EUI Normalized by Hours of Operation Annual EUI Assumed # Assumed # Facility Type 2014 Annual Normalized to of Weekly of Annual (in order as listed on pages 17- Site EUI 40 hours per Operating Operating 32) (kBtu/sq.ft.) week Hours * Hours (kBtu/sq.ft.) Convention Center 71.16 112 5824 25.41 Performance Hall 55.68 75 3900 29.70 Art/Cultural Center 33.42 57 2964 23.45

Museum 179.93 55 2860 130.86 Childcare / Teen Center 30.44 ? ** ? ?

College / Adult Education 77.34 50 2600 61.88 High School *** 33.13 50 1950 35.33

Elementary / Middle School *** 30.30 50 1950 32.32 Library 64.15 47 2444 54.59 Homeless Service 144.84 143 7436 40.51 Medical Clinic 103.82 53 2756 78.35 Mental Health Center 34.34 51 2652 26.93 Veterinarian 189.86 168 8736 45.20 Hospital 282.35 168 8736 67.23 General Office 60.32 56 2912 43.09 Courthouse 41.66 50 2600 33.33 Fire Station 62.29 166 8632 15.01 Police Station 73.82 168 8736 17.58 Emergency Center 231.97 168 8736 55.23 Jail / Correctional 90.19 149 7748 24.21 Clubhouse 58.63 ? ** ? ? Recreation Center 49.79 62 3224 32.12 Swimming Pool 294.03 65 3380 180.94 Other Recreational Buildings 67.46 ? ** ? ? Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair 65.52 82 4264 31.96 Other Shops 25.40 ? ** ? ? Warehouses 17.04 43 2236 15.86 Parking Garage 7.88 132 6864 2.39 Transit Station 56.38 148 7696 15.24 Airport 93.60 157 8164 23.85

* Based on average weekly operating hours reported in departmental survey for each facility type ** Typical operating hours not obtained in departmental survey *** K-12 schools annual total assumes nine months of operation per year

Pictured: Human Services Agency Headquarters

Year Built: 1979

Building Information: 171,385 Square Feet of Office Space, Eight Stories High (pictured above)

In summer of 2014, the Human Services Agency Headquarters (HSA) and the SFPUC completed a retrofit of the building’s HVAC systems through the SFPUC’s Job Order Contract (JOC) program. The project replaced aging and inefficient mechanical equipment including the building’s existing space heating boiler, hot water pumps, chillers, chilled water pumps, cooling tower, and energy management system. The parking garage exhaust fans were also retrofitted using variable frequency drives (VFDs) and carbon monoxide sensors. The project combined HSA capital improvement funding sources and SFPUC General Fund Energy Efficiency Program funding sources. Overall, the SFPUC spent just over $675,000 on energy efficiency improvements at HSA headquarters during the duration of this project.

With the completion of these improvements, and partly due to warmer weather in general, the Human Services Agency Headquarters used 36.3% less energy in calendar year 2014 than in 2013, due to decreases in both natural gas and electricity use. Human Services Agency Headquarters also decreased its carbon footprint by a factor of 71% over the last year, decreasing from 2.39 to 0.69 pounds of carbon dioxide per square foot.

Photograph Information and Sources

Cover Page: San Francisco General Hospital Rebuild Project (Photo Credit: Department of Public Heath)

Page 6: New North Beach Public Library with Solar PV Array (Photo Credit: Robin Scheswohl)

San Francisco Animal Shelter (Photo Credit: SFPUC Power)

Page 7-8: City Hall Solar Array Installation (Photo Credit: Robin Scheswohl)

Page 36: Human Services Agency Energy Retrofit including Boiler and Chiller Upgrades (Photo Credit: SFPUC Power)

For more information about the clean energy programs of the

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, please visit our website: