North America

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

North America 15 North America STEWART COHEN (CANADA) AND KATHLEEN MILLER (USA) Lead Authors: K. Duncan (Canada), E. Gregorich (Canada), P. Groffman (USA), P. Kovacs (Canada), V. Magaña (Mexico), D. McKnight (USA), E. Mills (USA), D. Schimel (USA) Contributing Authors: G. Chichilnisky (USA), D. Etkin (Canada), R. Fleming (Canada), K. Hall (USA), S. Meyn (Canada), J. Patz (USA), R. Pulwarty (USA), D. Scott (Canada), G. Wall (Canada) Review Editor: E. Wheaton (Canada) CONTENTS Executive Summary 73 7 15 . 2 . 6 . Tourism and Recreation 76 9 15 . 2 . 7 Public and Private Insurance Systems 77 0 15 . 1 . The North American Region 74 1 15 . 2 . 7 . 1 Private-Sector Insurance Systems 77 0 15 . 1 . 1 . Previous Wor k 74 1 15 . 2 . 7 . 2 Government-Based Insurance 15 . 1 . 2 . What is Different about the and Disaster-Relief Systems 77 3 North American Region? 74 1 15 . 2 . 7 . 3 Creating and Maintaining 15 . 1 . 2 . 1 . High Level of Adaptive Capacity 77 4 Intensive Water Management 74 2 15 . 2 . 7 . 4 Equity and Sustainability Issues 15 .1 . 2 . 2.U r b a ni z a t i o n 74 3 in Relation to Insurance 77 5 15 . 1 . 2 . 3 . Continental Free Tra d e 74 3 15 . 1 . 3 . Past to Present 74 4 15 . 3 . Adaptation Potential and Vul n e r a b i l i t y 77 5 15 . 1 . 4 . Scenarios for the Future 74 4 15 . 3 . 1 . Generic Issues 77 5 15 . 3 . 2 . Subregional and Extra-Regional Cases 77 5 15 . 2 . Key Regional Characteristics 74 5 15 .3 . 2 . 1.I n t r o du c t i o n 77 5 15 . 2 . 1 . Water Resources 74 5 15 . 3 . 2 . 2 . Pacific Subregion 77 6 15 . 2 . 1 . 1 . Impacts and Adaptation Options 74 7 15 . 3 . 2 . 3 . Rocky Mountains– 15 . 2 . 1 . 2 . Water Quality 74 8 Southwest U.S. Subregion 77 7 15 . 2 . 1 . 3 . Flood Risks 74 9 15 . 3 . 2 . 4 . Prairies–Great Plains Subregion 77 8 15 . 2 . 2 . Natural Resources 75 0 15 . 3 . 2 . 5 . Great Lakes– 15 . 2 . 2 . 1 . Forests 75 0 St. Lawrence Subregion 77 8 15 . 2 . 2 . 2 . Protected Ar e a s 75 2 15 . 3 . 2 . 6 . North Atlantic Subregion 77 8 15 . 2 . 3 . Food and Fiber 75 4 15 . 3 . 2 . 7 . Southeast United States 78 0 15 . 2 . 3 . 1 . Agriculture 75 4 15 . 3 . 2 . 8 . Arctic Border 78 0 15 . 2 . 3 . 2 . Production Forestry 75 9 15 . 3 . 2 . 9 . U.S.–Mexican Border 78 2 15 . 2 . 3 . 3 . Marine Fisheries 76 0 15 . 3 . 2 . 1 0 . U.S.–Caribbean Border 78 3 15 . 2 . 4 . Human Health 76 1 15 . 2 . 4 . 1 . Potential Direct Health Impacts 15 . 4 . Sy n t h e s i s 78 3 of Climate Change 76 1 15 . 2 . 4 . 2 . Potential Indirect Health Impacts Re f e re n c e s 78 4 of Climate Change 76 2 15 . 2 . 5 . Human Settlements and Infrastructure 76 5 15 . 2 . 5 . 1 . Demographic Pressures 76 5 15 . 2 . 5 . 2 . Infrastructure Investments in Ad a p t a t i o n 76 6 15 . 2 . 5 . 3 . Coastal Regions Particularly Vul n e r a b l e 76 6 15 . 2 . 5 . 4 . Vulnerability to System Failure 76 7 15 . 2 . 5 . 5 . Development and Vulnerability to Extreme Events 76 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY North America has experienced challenges posed by changing with a larger proportion of runoff occurring in winter, together climates and changing patterns of regional development and with possible reductions in summer flows (high confidence). will continue to do so. Varying impacts on ecosystems and human settlements will exacerbate subregional differences in Adaptive responses to such seasonal runoff changes could climate-sensitive resource production and vulnerability to include altered management of artificial storage capacity, extreme events. Opportunities may arise from a warming climate, increased reliance on conjunctive management of ground and and some innovative adaptation strategies are being tested as a surface water supplies, and voluntary water transfers between response to current challenges (e.g., water banks), but there are various water users. It may not be possible, however, to avoid few studies on how these strategies could be implemented as adverse impacts on many aquatic ecosystems or to fully offset regional climates continue to change. Recent experience the impacts of reduced summer water availability for irrigation demonstrates high capability in emergency response to and other out-of-stream and instream water uses. extreme events, but long-term problems remain. Where lower summer flows and higher water temperatures occur, there may be reduced water quality and increased stress Climate Trends and Scenarios on aquatic ecosystems (medium confidence). North America has warmed by about 0.7°C during the past Possible changes in the frequency/intensity/duration of heavy c e ntury and precipitation has increased, but both trends are precipitation events may require changes in land-use planning h e terogeneous (e.g., seasonal reductions in precipitation in and infrastructure design to avoid increased damages arising some areas). from flooding, landslides, sewerage overflows, and releases of contaminants to natural water bodies. For a range of emission scenarios produced for this Third Assessment Report, model results suggest that North America Responses to recurring and emerging water quality and quantity could warm by 1–3°C over the next century for a low-emissions problems will provide opportunities to develop and test adaptive case (B1). Warming could be as much as 3.5–7.5°C for the management options. higher emission A2 case. Published regional impact studies have used climate scenarios with global temperature changes that are similar to these new cases, but regional scenarios may Natural Resources not be directly comparable. Forests Key Regional Concerns Climate change is expected to increase the areal extent and productivity of forests over the next 50–100 years (medium Water Resources confidence). Extreme and/or long-term climate change scenarios indicate the possibility of widespread decline (low confidence). Changes in precipitation are highly uncertain. There is little agreement across climate scenarios regarding changes in total Climate change is likely to cause changes in the nature and extent annual runoff across North America. of several “disturbance factors” (e.g., fire, insect outbreaks) (medium confidence). Of particular interest in North America The modeled impact of increased temperatures on lake are changes in fire regimes, including an earlier start to the fire e v a p oration leads to consistent projections of reduced lake season, and significant increases in the area experiencing high l e vels and outflows for the Great Lakes–St. Lawrence system to extreme fire danger. The long-term effects of fire will depend under most climate change scenarios (medium confidence). Th e heavily on changes in human fire management activities, only exception is the HadCM2 transient scenario incorporating which are uncertain, especially in remote boreal forests. IS92a sulfate aerosol emissions, which suggests slight increases in lake levels and outflows. There is a strong need for a long-term comprehensive system to monitor forest “health” and disturbance regimes over regional Where snowmelt currently is an important part of the hydrological scales that can function as an early warning system for climate regime (e.g., Columbia basin), seasonal shifts in runoff are likely, change effects on forests. 738 North America Protected Areas and circulation dynamics—play an important role in determining the productivity of several North American fisheries (high Climate change can lead to loss of specific ecosystem types, c o nfidence). such as high alpine areas and specific coastal (e.g., salt m a r s hes) and inland (e.g., prairie “potholes”) wetland types Projected climate changes have the potential to affect coastal (high confidence). There is moderate potential for adaptation to and marine ecosystems, with impacts on the abundance and prevent these losses by planning conservation programs to spatial distribution of species that are important to commercial identify and protect particularly threatened ecosystems. and recreational fisheries. The degree of impact is likely to vary within a wide range, depending on species and community characteristics and region-specific conditions. These impacts Food and Fiber are complex and difficult to observe, so climate variability c o nstitutes a significant source of uncertainty for fishery Agriculture m a nagers. Recent experiences with Pacific salmon and At l a n t i c cod suggests that sustainable fisheries management will require Food production is projected to benefit from a warmer climate, timely and accurate scientific information on environmental but there probably will be strong regional effects, with some conditions that affect fish stocks, as well as institutional areas in North America suffering significant loss of comparative flexibility to respond quickly to such information. advantage to other regions (high confidence). There is potential for increased drought in the U.S. Great Plains/Canadian Prairies and opportunities for a limited northward shift in production Human Health areas in Canada (high confidence). Crop yield studies for the United States and Canada have indicated a wide range of impacts. Increased frequency and severity of heat waves may lead to an Modeled yield results that include direct physiological effects increase in illness and death, particularly among young, elderly, of carbon dioxide (CO2), with sufficient water and nutrients, and frail people, especially in large urban centers. The net are substantially different from those that do not account for effect of reduced severity of extreme cold is likely to have a such effects.
Recommended publications
  • The Air Severe Thunderstorm Model for the United States
    In 2011, six severe thunderstorms The AIR Severe generated insured losses of over USD 1 billion each. Total losses from Thunderstorm 24 separate outbreaks that year exceeded USD 26 billion. With the potential for insured losses on both an Model for the occurrence and aggregate basis this high, companies need the best tools available to assess and mitigate U.S. United States severe thunderstorm risk. THE AIR SEVERE THUNDERSTORM MODEL FOR THE UNITED STATES The AIR Severe Thunderstorm Model AIR Worldwide has developed for the United States estimates the a comprehensive Severe frequency, severity, and geographical Thunderstorm Model for the United States... The damage distribution of potential losses from functions are based on the straight-line winds, hail, and tornadoes. scientific relationship between building damage and wind The model incorporates the latest speed/hail impact energy. The scientific research into the highly model includes both the vertical fall speed [of hail] as well as the localized effects of these complex horizontal component of wind perils as well as independent research, speed to calculate impact energy. This is especially useful when post-disaster surveys, and more than estimating the amount of damage USD 40 billion in claims data. While to building exteriors such as siding and windows. severe thunderstorm is a relatively high- - Timothy Marshall, PE frequency peril, aggregate losses can Haag Engineering result in extreme volatility in financial results, making it crucial for companies to have a robust and highly granular An Innovative Way to Model Storm Occurrence The AIR U.S. severe thunderstorm model utilizes a large view of the risk.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 ACS PUMS DATA DICTIONARY August 7, 2015 HOUSING RECORD
    2011 ACS PUMS DATA DICTIONARY August 7, 2015 HOUSING RECORD RT 1 Record Type H .Housing Record or Group Quarters Unit SERIALNO 7 Housing unit/GQ person serial number 0000001..9999999 .Unique identifier DIVISION 1 Division code 0 .Puerto Rico 1 .New England (Northeast region) 2 .Middle Atlantic (Northeast region) 3 .East North Central (Midwest region) 4 .West North Central (Midwest region) 5 .South Atlantic (South region) 6 .East South Central (South region) 7 .West South Central (South Region) 8 .Mountain (West region) 9 .Pacific (West region) PUMA 5 Public use microdata area code (PUMA) 00100..08200 .Public use microdata area codes 77777 .Combination of 01801, 01802, and 01905 in Louisiana Note: Public use microdata areas (PUMAs) designate areas of 100,000 or more population. Use with ST for unique code. REGION 1 Region code 1 .Northeast 2 .Midwest 3 .South 4 .West 9 .Puerto Rico ST 2 State Code 01 .Alabama/AL 02 .Alaska/AK 04 .Arizona/AZ 05 .Arkansas/AR 06 .California/CA 08 .Colorado/CO 09 .Connecticut/CT 10 .Delaware/DE 11 .District of Columbia/DC 12 .Florida/FL 13 .Georgia/GA 1 15 .Hawaii/HI 16 .Idaho/ID 17 .Illinois/IL 18 .Indiana/IN 19 .Iowa/IA 20 .Kansas/KS 21 .Kentucky/KY 22 .Louisiana/LA 23 .Maine/ME 24 .Maryland/MD 25 .Massachusetts/MA 26 .Michigan/MI 27 .Minnesota/MN 28 .Mississippi/MS 29 .Missouri/MO 30 .Montana/MT 31 .Nebraska/NE 32 .Nevada/NV 33 .New Hampshire/NH 34 .New Jersey/NJ 35 .New Mexico/NM 36 .New York/NY 37 .North Carolina/NC 38 .North Dakota/ND 39 .Ohio/OH 40 .Oklahoma/OK 41 .Oregon/OR 42 .Pennsylvania/PA 44 .Rhode
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions to Regional Haze in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States
    Contributions to Regional Haze in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic United States Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) Contribution Assessment Prepared by NESCAUM For the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) Figure III-21 2002 Annual Average PM 2.5 , Sulfate, Nitrate and Total Carbon for MANE-VU based on IMPROVE and STN data. Mass data are supplemented by the FRM network AIRS vs. CMAQ in PA,MD,DE,DC,VA,WV,NC during August 9~16, 2002 100 O3 hourly 75 O3 daytime hourly O3 diurnal max 50 O3 daily mean 15%/35% Fractional Error (%) . (%) Error Fractional 25 30%/50% 60%/75% 0 -75 -50 -25 0 25 50 75 Fractional Bias (%) Contribution to PM Sulfate in Brigantine, NJ Surface Emission + All Canada & Mexico PA Emission 11.2% 30% OH Other US Elevated 9.2% Emission 1.9% NY 4.3% RI VT WV 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% DC CONTRIBUTION OF RPO TO PM SO4 IN CLASS I AREAS 0.0% ME MD MANE-VU LADCO VISTAS CenRAP0.1% Esurface 4.0% AR VA 100 NH MS 0.2% 4.0% 90 0.3% IN 0.3% SC MI 80 AL GA KY 3.9% CT TX 0.9% DE 2.9% LA 1.2% 2.2% NJ 70 0.5% 0.7% 1.6% 2.0% 0.3% NC 3.5% 60 TN IL IA MA WI 2.9% 50 MN MO 1.6% 2.2% 0.6% 1.0% 1.3% Percent 40 0.5% 0.9% 30 20 10 0 Brigantine, NJ Acadia, ME Lye Brook, VT Shenandoah, VA August 2006 Members of NESCAUM Board Arthur Marin, Executive Director NESCAUM Anne Gobin, Bureau Chief Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air Management James P.
    [Show full text]
  • TCA 049.Pdf (2.027Mb)
    Detección de la tendencia local del cambio de la temperatura en México • René Lobato-Sánchez* • Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua, Jiutepec, México *Autor para correspondencia • Miguel Ángel Altamirano-del-Carmen • Consultor, Ciudad de México, México DOI: 10.24850/j-tyca-2017-06-07 Resumen Abstract Lobato-Sánchez, R., & Altamirano-del-Carmen, M. A. Lobato-Sánchez, R., & Altamirano-del-Carmen, M. A. (November- (noviembre-diciembre, 2017). Detección de la tendencia local December, 2017). Detection of local temperature trends in Mexico. del cambio de la temperatura en México. Tecnología y Ciencias Water Technology and Sciences (in Spanish), 8(6), 101-116, del Agua, 8(6), 101-116, DOI: 10.24850/j-tyca-2017-06-07. DOI: 10.24850/j-tyca-2017-06-07. Registros de temperatura indican que tres de cada cuatro Temperature records indicate that three of the four climatic stations estaciones climáticas evaluadas en México señalan un evaluated in Mexico show warming over the years 1950 to 2013, as calentamiento en el periodo 1950-2013, tomando como compared to the period 1961 to 1990 which was used as a baseline. referencia al periodo base 1961-1990. Después de un análisis After a complete analysis of climate records in Mexico, only 112 completo de registros climáticos en México, se determinó que were determined to have met the quality and standards required 101 solamente 112 registros cumplen con la calidad y estándares for the present study. From those, a subset of 20 stations with a requeridos para el presente estudio, de ahí se seleccionó, positive trend were randomly selected, which were representative de forma aleatoria, un subconjunto de 20 estaciones con of urban and rural areas distributed across Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Location of Mexico Mexico Is the Second-Largest Country by Size and Population in Latin America
    Read and Respond: Location, Climate, and Natural Resources of Mexico and Venezuela Location of Mexico Mexico is the second-largest country by size and population in Latin America. It is the largest Spanish- speaking country in the world. The country is located south of the United States. On the west is the Pacific Ocean, and on the east are the Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean Sea. Mexico’s location between the Pacific Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea allows it the opportunity to trade. There are seven major seaports in Mexico. Oil and other materials from Mexico can be easily shipped around the world to ports along the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Another advantage of Mexico’s location is that it is close to the United States. Because the two countries share a border, trade is easier. Railroads and trucks can be used to ship goods. Mexico’s main trading partner is the United States. Climate of Mexico Mexico has the Sierra Madre Mountains, deserts in the north, tropical beaches, plains, and plateaus. The climate varies according to the location, with some tropical areas receiving more than 40 inches of rain a year. Desert areas in the north remain dry most of the year. Most people live on the Central Plateau of Mexico in the central part of the country. Mexico City, one of the world’s largest cities, is in this region. There is arable (farmable) land in this region, and there is usually enough rain to grow a variety of crops. The region has many manufacturing centers, which provide jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Computer Modeling in Estimating and Managing Future Catastrophe Losses
    The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Vol. 27 No. 2 (April 2002) 181±195 The Use of Computer Modeling in Estimating and Managing Future Catastrophe Losses by Karen M. Clarkà Overview Over the past two decades, the use of computer modeling to estimate future losses from natural catastrophes has gone from being virtually unheard of to being the standard global risk assessment technology. This is primarily the result of the unprecedented and unexpected losses sustained by insurance and reinsurance companies from actual catastrophe events, most notably the series of winter storms that struck Europe in 1990, Hurricane Andrew in 1992 and the 1994 Northridge Earthquake. By the mid-1990s it was apparent to all that the catastrophe loss potential was far greater than had previously been thought possible, even though some computer models available much earlier had been providing loss estimates well in excess of the losses sustained from Andrew and Northridge. However, these larger loss scenarios were not taken seriously by most in the industry without the actual occurrence of a major loss-producing event. Today, catastrophe modeling is used extensively for pricing, risk selection and underwriting, loss mitigation activities, reinsurance decision-making and overall portfolio management. This paper presents a history of catastrophe modeling technology and an explanation of how catastrophe models work. It also reviews recent advances in catastrophe modeling and concludes with a discussion of how insurers and reinsurers can derive maximum value from
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean Billfish Project?
    Image by sportfishimages.com What is the Caribbean Billfish Project? The goal of the Caribbean Billfish Project (CBP) is to recapture lost wealth and contribute to sustainable livelihoods in the West- ern Central Atlantic region through investment in economically, technically and ecologically feasible billfish fisheries management and conservation approaches. The objective is to develop business plans for one or more long-term pilot projects aimed at sustain- able management and conservation of billfish within the Western Central Atlantic Ocean. The CBP has 4 components: 1. Generating value and conservation outcomes through innovative management. 2. Strengthening regional billfish management and conservation planning. 3. A Functional and Responsive Consortium on Billfish Management and Conservation (CBMC). 4. Business plans developed for pilot investments in sustainable management and conservation of billfish. 2 • Caribbean Billfish Project List of Acronyms CBMC Consortium on Billfish Management and Conservation CFMC Caribbean Fisheries Management Council CI Conservation International CNFO Caribbean Network of Fisherfolk Organizations CRFM Caribbean Regional Fisheries Mechanism FAD Fish Aggregating Devices GGFA Grenada Game Fishing Association ICCAT International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas IUU Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated IGFA International Game Fish Association OSPESCA Central America Fisheries and Aquaculture Organization RFMO Regional Fisheries Management Organization RFB Regional Fisheries Body WECAFC Western
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Land-Use Changes on the Climate of the Mexico City Region
    Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM Ernesto Jáuregui ISSN 0188-4611, Núm. 55, 2004, pp. 46-60 Impact of land-use changes on the climate of the Mexico City Region Ernesto Jáuregui* Recibido: 17 de junio de 2004 Aceptado en versión final: 21 de septiembre de 2004 Abstract. It is well established that anthropogenic land-use changes directly affect the atmospheric boundary layer at the mesoscale dimensions. Located in the high lands of Central Mexico, the basin of Mexico (7 500 km2) has undergone a widespread conversion of natural vegetation to urban and agricultural land by deforestation. While the urban extension of the capital city occupied 6% of the basin in 1960, at the end of the twentieth century the urban sprawl had increased considerably to 20% of the total area. This phenomenal growth has impacted on the thermal climate of substantial portions of the basin. In this paper using annual temperature and precipitation data for a 25 year period, an attempt is made to identify interdecadal climate changes. Results show that large areas of the basin have changed toward a warmer drier climate. While afternoon temperatures have increased at a rate of 0.07° C/yr in the suburbs of the city the corresponding area averaged value for the rural sites is somewhat less: 0.06° C/yr. The afternoon temperature increase for the total number of stations used was 0.06° C/yr. The area-averaged minimum temperature increase in suburban stations (3) was 0.15° C/yr while that corresponding to surrounding rural sites was 0.08° C/yr for period 1961-1985.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Insurance: an Agenda for Action in the United States
    Climate Change and Insurance: An Agenda for Action in the United States A publication of Allianz Group and WWF, October 2006 FOREWORD Climate change poses significant risks throughout the United States, particularly to coastal, flood-prone and fire-prone areas . Allianz and World Wildlife Fund (WWF) are working together to understand and better manage the true risks of global warming. Without examining how global warming could intensify risk it is impractical for Allianz, WWF and our peers to carry out long term planning to protect assets. The insurance industry has a two-fold responsibility. On the one hand, it needs to prepare itself for the negative effects that climate change may have on its business and on its customers. On the other hand, it can significantly help mitigate the eco- nomic risks and enter the low-carbon economy by providing appropriate products and services. Allianz Group and WWF have joined forces to produce a report that will advance the debate in the insurance industry, and propose solutions. The report identifies risks for the sector, emerging physical impacts that will likely be amplified with climate change, and develops actions that demonstrate how insurance providers, such as Allianz Group, can respond to these risks in a meaningful and responsible manner. Implementing these actions will mean big steps forward, developing sound practices business for a living planet. WWF and Allianz Group will work together to implement the actions of this report and to take responsible steps to help solve this global problem. Allianz and WWF strongly believe that companies that are ready to seize these new opportunities will ultimately be able to reap benefits for society and for their shareholders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Climate of Mexico City
    298 Erdkunde Band XXVII Kawagoe und Shiba einem doppelten Spannungsver der Landflucht ist jedoch aus Kapazitatsgriinden si haltnis ausgesetzt. Als zentripetale Zentralorte und cher. Wanderungszentren sind sie fiir ein weiteres Hinter 2. Hauptanziehungsgebiet werden die grofistadtorien land kaum besonders attraktiv. Die Zentralisations tierten pazifischen Ballungsraume bleiben. Dabei spannungen fiihren iiber sie hinaus direkt zum Haupt wird sich eine weitere zunehmend grofiraumige zentrum. von Ihre Entwicklung wird zentrifugalen der in mit - Ausweitung Ballungszonen Verbindung Kraften der Sie Ballungskerne gesteuert. wachsen, dem Bau neuer Strecken des Schienenschnellver aus - jedoch nicht eigener Kraft sondern als Satelliten. kehrs und neuer Autobahnen abzeichnen. Demgegenuber steht die sich eigenstandig verstar 3. Eine weitere Verstarkung der zwischenstadtischen kende regionale Vormacht der Prafektur-Hauptorte, Wanderungen wird sich auch auf den Austausch die echte Regionalzentren geworden sind. Sobald es zwischen den Ballungsgebieten auswirken. Eine Stu ihnen gelang, konkurrierende Nachbarstadte funktio wird sich nur da vollziehen, wo kla nal zu iiberschichtenund zu iiberholen, fenwanderung grofienmafiig re zentralortliche Hierarchien vorliegen. wuchs und wachst ihr Vorsprung unaufhaltsam wei ter.Das istAomori gegeniiberHirosaki erst halb, Sap 4. Das Prinzip der Wanderungs-Zentralitat aufierhalb erster den poro gegeniiber Asahikawa und Otaru bereits voll ge der Ballungsgebiete wird in Linie grofie ren mit mehr als 300 000 Einwoh lungen. Mentalitat und Wanderungsverhalten der ja Regionalzentren nern wer panischen Bevolkerung unterstutzen den Prozefi der zugute kommen. Kleinere Landeszentren Selbstverstarkung, der das Modell des ?Grofien To den mit der Ausdunnung ihres landlichen Umlandes Prafektur kyo" auf verschiedene ?Klein-Tokyos" im ganzen weiter abnehmen. Die dominierenden werden am starksten weiterwachsen. Land ubertragt. Hauptstadte Es wird abzuwarten sein, in welchem Mafie die zur des neuen Minister D.
    [Show full text]
  • About MANE-VU.Pmd
    ABOUT Mid-Atlantic/Northeast MANE-VU Visibility Union FACT SHEET Regional haze is air pollution that visually obscures mountain ranges, city skylines and scenic vistas. With regional haze diminishing pristine views of the Nation’s national parks and wilderness areas, visi- tors may not experience the beauty seen in the past. Regional haze also poses risks to human health. An organization called MANE-VU, a coalition of air quality experts from nearly 20 federal, state and tribal agencies, is working to develop solutions to bring back beautiful vistas to the Mid-Atlantic and North- east regions. MANE-VU, the Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union, includes representatives from Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, the Penobscot Indian Nation, Rhode Island, St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, Ver- mont, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Forest Service, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, and the National Park Service. The federal Clean Air Act requires EPA to address impaired visibility caused by haze in federal Class I areas – certain national parks and wilderness areas. In 1999 EPA issued the Regional Haze Rule, which requires states and interested tribes to take steps to reduce haze-causing emissions from numerous sources over large geographic areas. In accordance with the Rule, all states in the na- tion are required to identify key sources of haze- causing pollution, develop plans to reduce emis- sions from those sources, and submit these plans to EPA by 2008. EPA established five regional planning organizations across the nation to coor- dinate this effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Structure of the Atlantic Margins and Neighboring Oceanic Crust from Wide-Angle Seismic Data and Plate Kinematic Reconstructions
    Deep structure of the Atlantic margins and neighboring oceanic crust from wide-angle seismic data and plate kinematic reconstructions. Frauke Klingelhoefer, Youssef Biari, Dieter Franke, Thomas Funck, Lies Loncke, Jean-Claude Sibuet, Christophe Basile, James Austin, Caesar Rigoti, Mohamed Sahabi, Massinissa Benabdellouahed, and Walter Roest This study Biari et al., 2021 Rotational poles Matthews et al., 2016 Volcanic provinces Whittaker et al., 2015 Marginal plateaus Loncke et al., 2020 Click to visit Conclusions Next slide Central Atlantic (~195 Ma) Initial extension Assymmetric seafloor spreading Accretion of thin oceanic crust Funck et al., 2004 Biari et al., 2015 Biari et al., 2017 ● 37 km unthinned continental crust thickness ● No indications for the existence of serpentinized upper mantle material ● 150 km broad region with serpentinized upper mantle material exhumed to the seafloor ● Oceanic crust of 7–8 km thickness ● ~3 thin oceanic crust ● Unthinned continental crust has a thickness of ~36 km South Atlantic – Falkland Segment (~160Ma) Schimschal and Jokat, 2019 Falkland Plateau comprises three regions: ● the Falkland/Malvinas islands (underlain by a 35 km crust of continental origin) ● the Falkland Plateau basin (underlain by thick oceanic crust) ● the Maurice Ewing Bank (28 km thick continental fragment heavily overprinted by magmatic intrusions) South Atlantic – Austral Segment (~133 Ma) Schnabel et al., 2008 Hirsch et al., 2009 ● 20–25 km of thinned continental crust ● Continental crust thinning from 40 to 15 km below the SDR ● One single thick SDR complex ● Further thinning crust seaward of SDR. ● Up to 10 km thick underplate layers at the ● High velocity lower crustal body transition zone interpreted to be igneous material.
    [Show full text]