The Sale of the Twelve Regional Electricity Companies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Sale of the Twelve Regional Electricity Companies NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE REPORTBY THE COMPTROLLERAND AUDITOR GENERAL The Sale of the Twelve Regional ElectricityCompanies ORDEREDBY THEHOUSEOFCOMMONS TO BE PRINTED 6 MAY1992 LONDON:HMSO 10 f7.10 NET \ THE SALE OF THE TWELVE REGIONAL ELECTRICITY COMPANIES This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act, 1963 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. John Bourn National Audit Office Comptroller and Auditor General 31 March 1992 The Comptroller and Auditor General is the head of the National Audit Office employing some 900 staff. He, and the NAO, are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide rangeof otherpublic sector bodies; and he hasstatutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies use their resources. i THE SALE OF THE TWELVE REGIONAL ELECTRICITY COMPANIES Contents Pages Summary and conclusions 1 Part 1: The companies and the sale 7 Part 2: Achievement of objectives 9 Part 3: Control of costs 23 Glossary of terms 27 Appendices 1. Electricity industry restructuring 28 2. The twelve companies 30 3. List of the principal advisers and contractors appointed by the Department 31 THE SALE OF THE TWELVE REGIONAL ELECTRICITY COMPANIES Summary and conclusions 1 In December 1990 the Secretary of State for Energy sold the twelve regional electricity companies in England and Wales. The Department of Energy (the Department) estimated that gross proceeds will amount to some E7.9 billion, payable in two forms: nearly E5.l billion, in instalments, from the sale of the shares and some E2.8 billion from staged debt repayments. Since the sale the Department have been merged with the Department of Trade and Industry who are now responsible for the matters dealt with in this report. 2 This was one of the largest sales since 1979. It was also one of the most complex, involving the simultaneous disposal of all the Government’s shareholdings in the twelve regional electricity companies, who distribute and sell electricity to customers in England and Wales. The sale introduced an entirely new sector to the London Stock Exchange. It followed a radical restructuring of the electricity industry’s organisation and its commercial and regulatory arrangements. It was the first of an ambitious series of three sales planned in the British electricity sector, to be followed by the sale of National Power and PowerGen, who generate electricity in England and Wales, and the Scottish companies ScottishPower and Hydro-Electric. 3 The twelve electricity companies were floated on the London Stock Exchange by means of a fixed price offer. Shares totalling some 2.1 billion were offered for sale at Q.40 each, payable in three instalments. 4 The Government’s overriding objective was to complete the sale of the electricity industry during the lifetime of the Parliament. Within that overriding objective, the Department sought: to maximise net proceeds; to widen and deepen share ownership among individuals; to achieve the overall recognition that the sale of the regional companies had been a success; and to achieve a modest premium over the issue price following the start of share dealings. 6 This report sets out the results of a National Audit Office examination of how far the Department achieved their objectives for the sale and how they controlled its costs. During the course of their work, the National Audit Office examined Departmental papers, held discussions with Departmental officials and advisers, and consulted the Chairmen and senior executives of three of the companies. The National Audit Office were assisted in their work by Hambros Bank Limited and SRU Limited, strategic market consultants. Achievement of 6 The National Audit Office’s main findings and conclusion are: objectives On the overriding objective of completing the sale to timetable (a) The Department completed the sale of the regional electricity companies by their December 1990 target, paving the way for the generating companies to be sold in March 1991 and the Scottish companies by June 1991 (paragraphs 2.2 to 2.6). 1 THE SALE OF THE TWELVE REGIONAL ELECTRICITY COMPANIES On maximising net proceeds Method of sole (b) In floating the companies, the Department took appropriate steps to identify and evaluate a variety of options that might help maximise net proceeds. Introducing major innovations into the chosen method of sale would not have been without risk to achieving this objective, given the novelty of the companies and the considerable uncertainty of the market at the time of the sale (paragraphs 2.9 to 2.16). (c) The National Audit Office recognise these uncertainties but, with the benefit of hindsight, note that if a back-end tender- which the Department succeeded in implementing for the first time in the subsequent sale of the generating companies-could have been successfully introduced in this sale, it would have enabled the Department to share in the increase in the value of the companies which, in the avant, took place during the offer period. In the circumstances at the time of the sale, however, the Department accepted the strong recommendation of their advisers that introducing such measures would have entailed risks to the success of the sale, and to proceeds, outweighing the potential gain. Valuation of the assets (d) The approach adopted by the Department to the valuation of the companies’ assets was reasonable in the circumstances of this sale (paragraphs 2.20 to 2.23). Clawback [e) The Department introduced provision for clawback on gains arising from the disposal of land and buildings between 31 March 1990 and 31 March 2000 (paragraphs 2.24 and 2.25). (f) The Department also considered but did not introduce provision for clawback on profits. The view of the Department and their advisers was, and remains, that the existence of such a provision would have altered the basis on which the negotiations on dividends took place. Their view is that, if profit clawback had been introduced, they would have had a much reduced chance of achieving the levels of dividend that they soughtand obtained, and an increasedchance of havingto sell the companies at a less advantageous yield, and that either of these factors would have had more of a negative impact on proceeds than the potential profits to be clawed back (paragraph 2.26). (g) Overall profit outturn for 1990-91 was 22 per cent (E214.4 million) higher than forecast. The Department note that dividends, which are the main determinant of proceeds, were however set on the basis of underlying profit performance not on the first year profit forecasts, which were necessarily set on a cautious basis (paragraphs 2.27 to 2.30). In view, however, of the limited track record of the companies and the correspondingly cautious basis on which forecasts for the first year were made, the National Audit Office and their advisers, Hambros, believe that it would have been appropriate for the Department to have explored in detail with their advisers whether higher net proceeds might have been achievable by making provision for clawback of a proportion of at least some part of any profits exceeding the forecast for 2 THE SALE OF THE TWELVE REGIONAL ELECTRICITY COMPANIES that first year. Even such a limited clawback would have called for a careful assessment as to whether a provision along these lines could be implemented without greater negative impact either on the dividends which the companies would be prepared to offer, or on the dividend yield which investors would be prepared to accept; and of course for careful presentation to companies and investors. The assessment of the Department and their advisers is that any benefit from such a provision would, in this sale, have been significantly outweighed by the loss of proceeds likely to have resulted from lower dividends or higher yield, or a combination of both. Sale of all the shoreholding (h) The Department kept open the possibility of selling only part of the Government’s shareholding (60 per cent), in case there was a severe deterioration in market conditions. In the event, however, they proceeded with a 100 per cent sale because they saw it as offering the best balance of risk in the circumstances (paragraphs 2.36 to 2.41). Pricing the offer (i) The Department set the fully paid value of the shares at nearly E5.2 billion. In so doing, they sought the best price they thought they could get in negotiating the sale of these new companies during a period of unsettled market conditions (paragraphs 2.46 to 2.52). (j) Following the start of dealings, the market valued the shares at E6.3 billion. The Department’s advisers attribute this to upward movements in the stock market between the time the offer had to be priced, when market conditions were uncertain, and the start of dealings (paragraphs 2.53 to 2.60). (k) The National Audit Office’s consultants, Hambros, agree that most of the increase in the value of the electricity companies above the Department’s target premium was attributable to the upward movements in the market generally, and in particular to the increase in gas and water shares. The causes of these upward movements are likely to remain unclear because they flowed from the investment decisions of a large number of individual institutions. On widening and deepening share ownership Targets/planning assumptions (1) The Department succeeded in meeting their broad planning assumption for the number of individuals who might register their interest in the sale. The Department’s planning assumptions about the minimum level of subscription they saw as desirable, and their initial estimate of the number of applications to be processed, were however exceeded (paragraphs 2.65 to 2.69).
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Findings Plains Eastern Clean Line
    United States Department of Energy Summary of Findings In re Application of Clean Line Energy Partners LLC Pursuant to Section 1222 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 March 25, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS FREQUENTLY USED ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................ iii I. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1 II. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 2 a. Section 1222 of EPAct 2005......................................................................................................... 2 b. The Department’s 2010 Request for Proposals ............................................................................ 3 c. Clean Line’s Application .............................................................................................................. 4 d. Clean Line’s Regulatory Filings ................................................................................................... 5 e. DOE Review of Clean Line’s Application ................................................................................... 7 i. Environmental and Historic Property Review ....................................................................... 7 ii. Section 1222 Review.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES
    CES Working Paper 07/00 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Author: Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCES Tim Jackson ISSN: 1464-8083 Published by: Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford (Surrey) GU2 7XH, United Kingdom http://www.surrey.ac.uk/CES Publication date: 2000 © Centre for Environmental Strategy, 2007 The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and not of the Centre for Environmental Strategy. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the authors and the publishers cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials. This publication and its contents may be reproduced as long as the reference source is cited. ROYAL COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION STUDY ON ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT Paper prepared as background to the Study Renewable Energy Sources March 1998 Dr Tim Jackson* and Dr Ragnar Löfstedt Centre for Environmental Strategy University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 5XH E-mail: [email protected] The views expressed in the paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the thinking of the Royal Commission. Any queries about the paper should be directed to the author indicated * above. Whilst every reasonable effort has been made to ensure accurate transposition of the written reports onto the website, the Royal Commission cannot be held responsible for any accidental errors which might have been introduced during the transcription. Table of Contents Summary 1 Introduction 2 Renewable Energy Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D Major Events in the Energy Industry
    Annex D Major events in the Energy Industry 2017 Electricity The foundation stone for the new ElecLink electricity connection between Britain and France was laid in February 2017. The interconnector will run through the Channel Tunnel between Sellindge in the UK and Les Mandarins in France, and will provide 1000MW of electricity, enough capacity to power up to 2 million homes. Energy Efficiency Homes across Great Britain will get extra support to make their homes cheaper and easier to keep warm thanks to reforms that came into force in April 2017. Changes to the Energy Company Obligation (ECO) will make sure energy companies give support to people struggling to meet their heating bills, with plans announced to extend the scheme from April 2017 to September 2018. Smart Meters A Smart Meters bill was included in the Queen’s speech in June 2017 to allow the Government to continue to oversee the successful completion of the rollout of smart meters and protect consumers, leading to £5.7 billion of net benefits to Britain. 2016 Energy Policy The Energy Bill received Royal Assent in May 2016. In summary the Bill: Creates the framework to formally establish the Oil and Gas Authority (OGA) as an independent regulator, taking the form of a government company, so that it can act with greater flexibility and independence. It gives the OGA new powers including: access to external meetings; data acquisition and retention; dispute resolution; and sanctions. It also enables the transfer of the Secretary of State of the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) existing regulatory powers in respect of oil and gas to the OGA.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Experience: Privatization with Market Power
    The UK Experience: Privatization with Market Power David M Newbery Department of Applied Economics Cambridge, UK 8 February 1999 1. Introduction The UK has three quite distinct electricity supply industries (ESIs) in the three different jurisdictions of England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. In England and Wales (with a population just over 50 million and a peak demand of just over 49 GW) the industry was under public ownership from 1948-90, and for most of this period, the Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) operated all generation and transmission as a vertically integrated statutory monopoly, with 12 Area Boards acting as regional distribution monopolies. The CEGB had interconnectors to Scotland and France, with whom it traded electricity. Scotland (with a population of 5.1 million and peak demand of 5.6 GW, including exports of 800 MW to England) has always retained a degree of autonomy (in law and government) within Britain, while England and Wales are normally treated as a single jurisdiction.1 In Scotland there were two vertically integrated geographically distinct utilities, combining generation, transmission, distribution and supply, one serving the north, the other serving the south. Northern Ireland (with a population of 1.7 million and peak demand of 1.5 GW) is physically separate from the mainland, and the grid connection with Eire in the south had been severed by terrorist activity so that it was a small isolated system. It included all four functions within a single vertically integrated state-owned company, Northern Ireland Electricity (NIE). 2. Restructuring and ownership changes The Electricity Act 1989 divided the CEGB, with its 74 power stations and the national grid, into four companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Network Review
    A DISTRIBUTION NETWORK REVIEW ETSU K/EL/00188/REP Contractor P B Power Merz & McLellan Division PREPARED BY R J Fairbairn D Maunder P Kenyon The work described in this report was carried out under contract as part of the New and Renewable Energy Programme, managed by the Energy Technology Support Unit (ETSU) on behalf of the Department of Trade and Industry. The views and judgements expressed in this report are those of the contractor and do not necessarily reflect those of ETSU or the Department of Trade and Industry.__________ First published 1999 © Crown copyright 1999 Page iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.........................................................................................................................1.1 2. INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................2.1 3. BACKGROUND.........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Description of the existing electricity supply system in England , Scotland and Wales ...3.1 3.2 Summary of PES Licence conditions relating to the connection of embedded generation 3.5 3.3 Summary of conditions required to be met by an embedded generator .................................3.10 3.4 The effect of the Review of Electricity Trading Arrangements (RETA)..............................3.11 4. THE ABILITY OF THE UK DISTRIBUTION NETWORKS TO ACCEPT EMBEDDED GENERATION...................................................................................................................................................4.1
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap for Renewable Energy in the Middle East and North Africa
    January 2014 A Roadmap for Renewable Energy in the Middle East and North Africa Laura El-Katiri OIES PAPER: MEP 6 The contents of this paper are the authors’ sole responsibility. They do not necessarily represent the views of the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies or any of its members. Copyright © 2014 Oxford Institute for Energy Studies (Registered Charity, No. 286084) This publication may be reproduced in part for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. ISBN 978-1-907555-90-9 ii Abstract Home to more than half of the world’s crude oil and more than a third of its natural gas reserves, the MENA region has, for the past fifty years, gained enormous significance as a global producer and exporter of energy. The MENA region is already a major energy consumer, and is forecast to continue to account, alongside Asia, for the majority of the world’s energy demand growth well into the 2030s; placing domestic energy policies at the heart of the region’s economic agendas for the coming decades. This paper argues that renewable energy – most importantly solar power, with its particular regional climatic advantage – could play a significant role as a cost-competitive alternative to conventional fossil fuels, if the full opportunity cost of domestically consumed oil and natural gas resources is fully priced into the regional energy system.
    [Show full text]
  • Centrica Plc's Proposed Acquisition of TXU Europe's King's Lynn
    September 2001 Centrica plc’s proposed acquisition of TXU Europe’s King’s Lynn and Peterborough power stations A consultation paper 1. Introduction Purpose of this document 1.1 This document: ♦ gives details of the proposed acquisition of King’s Lynn and Peterborough power stations by Centrica plc; ♦ explains the merger control process for this transaction; and ♦ requests comments on the regulatory issues arising from the proposed transaction. 1.2 Ofgem will make recommendations to the Director General of Fair Trading in relation to this acquisition. In order to allow comments to be considered, Ofgem needs to receive these not later than 5pm on Wednesday 19 September 2001. 2. Details of the proposed acquisition 2.1 TXU Europe Group plc (TXU) owns both the gas fired power station businesses at King’s Lynn and Peterborough. TXU is proposing to sell these businesses to Centrica plc (Centrica). 2.2 Both King’s Lynn and Peterborough are wholly owned subsidiaries of TXU - namely Anglian Power Generators Limited (APGL) and Peterborough Power Limited (PPL), respectively. Centrica has entered into a binding contract with TXU, PPL and APGL to acquire the leaseholds and other interests in the power station businesses of PPL and APGL. 2.3 Centrica announced the proposed acquisition on 24 August 2001. The parties have notified the completed transaction to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) for a decision by the Secretary of State to clear the transaction or to refer it to the Competition Commission for further investigation. 3. Merger Control Process 3.1 This transaction falls within the scope of UK merger control law since the value of Centrica’s assets exceeds the £70 million threshold under the Fair Trading Act 1973 (FTA).
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Privatization in the United Kingdomand Its
    ELECTRICITY PRIVATIZATION IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND ITS RESULTS Colin ROBINSON Institute of Economic Affairs & University of Surrey -153- 1. A brief history 1.1 The nationalised period The electricity supply industry in Britain was nationalised by the Electricity Act of 1947, as part of the sweeping programme of nationalising the ‘commanding heights’ of the economy carried out by the 1945-51 Labour Government under Prime Minister Clement Attlee. Prior to nationalisation the industry had been regulated by the state almost from its beginnings in the late nineteenth century and the degree of regulation had grown in the interwar period.1 In 1919, Electricity Commissioners, responsible to the Minister of Transport, were appointed and in 1926 a Central Electricity Board was established to construct and own an electricity grid; the Board could give directions to power station owners and the Commissioners could determine the price of electricity from power stations if the Board and the owners could not agree. Nationalisation was seen at the time as the logical next step in this trend towards greater state involvement in the industry. The initial structure of the industry under nationalisation was a development of earlier regulatory schemes, designed to cope with what was perceived to be a rather complex industry. Most nationalised industries were run by a single corporation with Board members appointed by the responsible Minister. In electricity, however, there were a number of corporations. 1 The history of British electricity supply from the late nineteenth century to 1968 is summarised in R. Kelf-Cohen, Twenty Years of Nationalisation: The British Experience, Macmillan, 1969, especially Chapter 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex D Major Events in the Energy Industry
    Annex D Major events in the Energy Industry 2020 Electricity In July 2020 construction work commenced on what is set to be the world’s longest electricity interconnector, linking the UK’s power system with Denmark. Due for completion in 2023, the 765-kilometre ‘Viking Link’ cable will stretch from Lincolnshire to South Jutland in Denmark. In July 2020 approval was granted for the Vanguard offshore wind farm in Norfolk. The 1.8GW facility consisting of up to 180 turbines will generate enough electricity to power 1.95 million homes. In May 2020 approval was granted for Britain’s largest ever solar farm at Cleve Hill, near Whitstable in Kent. The 350MW facility, comprising of 800.000 solar panels, will begin operation in 2022 and will provide power to around 91,000 homes. Energy Prices In February 2020 the energy price cap was reduced by £17 to £1,162 per year, from 1 April for the six-month “summer” price cap period. 2019 Climate Change The Government laid draft legislation in Parliament in early June 2019 to end the UK’s contribution to climate change, by changing the UK’s legally binding long-term emissions reduction target to net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The new target is based on advice from the government’s independent advisors, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC). The legislation was signed into law in late June 2019, following approval by the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Energy Policy A joint government-industry Offshore Wind Sector Deal was announced in March 2019, which will lead to clean, green offshore wind providing more than 30% of British electricity by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • 29. 9. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 245/9
    29. 9. 90 Official Journal of the European Communities No C 245/9 Notice pursuant to Article 19 (3) of Council Regulation No 17/62 (') concerning the reorganization of the electricity industry in Scotland (2) (90/C 245/04) I. South of Scotland Electricity Board are now owned and operated by a separately established generating company, Until 31 March 1990 Scotland's electricity requirements Scottish Nuclear Ltd ('Scottish Nuclear') which will were met by two publicly owned corporations, North of remain in public ownership. Scottish Nuclear does not Scotland Hydro-Electric Board and South of Scotland supply direct to customers, selling all its output under Electricity Board, which generated, transmitted and contract to Scottish Power and Hydro-Electric distributed electricity in their assigned geographical areas, covering the north and south of Scotland respectively. The whole generating and transmission system in Scotland was planned and operated on a joint basis by these two publicly owned utilities so that elec­ The Electricity Act 1989 and subordinate legislation tricity was always generated from the cheapest station made thereunder set out the framework for the new first, in order to meet demand at the least cost. All costs regulatory system for the electricity industry in Scotland. of the system were pooled and met in proportion to the Under this Act any undertaking generating, transmitting number of units of electricity sold. Total Scottish elec­ or supplying electricity in Scotland needs a licence issued tricity demand was met by the two utilities roughly in the by the Secretary of State for Scotland or the proportion of 1:3, North:South.
    [Show full text]
  • Privatisation RESEARCH PAPER 14/61 20 November 2014
    Privatisation RESEARCH PAPER 14/61 20 November 2014 This paper examines the economic policy which came to be known as ‘privatisation’ – the transfer of responsibility for an industry or the ownership of a company from the public to the private sector. From the 1980s until the mid-1990s, privatisation was an important component of economic policy. Privatisation continued after 1997, although there have only been a handful of instances since then and they have often been referred to by other names. After 2010, interest in the policy as an economic tool revived, particularly with the privatisation of Royal Mail. After defining ‘privatisation’, this paper presents a brief history of the policy. An analysis of the motivations behind the policy is followed by a discussion of the different methods of privatisation, including public flotations, management-led buyouts and private sales. We discuss the importance of regulation and competition in privatised industries and present data showing the scale of privatisation in each year since 1970. Finally, we review various strategies for assessing privatisation as a policy and present a chronological table showing each major privatisation by year. The annex to this paper is a collection of short articles which describe the main features of each major privatisation, including the type of sale, the proceeds to government, and other details. Chris Rhodes David Hough Louise Butcher Recent Research Papers 14/52 Economic Indicators, October 2014 07.10.14 14/53 Recall of MPs Bill [Bill 94 of 2014-15] 09.10.14
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of the Electricity Industry Research Paper 94/93
    Regulation of the Electricity Industry Research Paper 94/93 1 August 1994 This paper examines the regulation of the UK electric industry. It discusses the role of the Director General of Electricity Supply, and the effects of this on prices and competition within the industry. Christopher Barclay Science and Environment Section House of Commons Library REGULATION OF THE ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY I. Introduction The idea of a privatised industry regulated by an independent regulator dates back to the privatisation of the telecommunications industry in 1984. The basic principle has remained largely the same, with a licence being issued by the Secretary of State and the regulator ensuring that the licence conditions are complied with in subsequent years. However, the regulators have far more importance than that simple description would imply. None has a more complex job than the Director General of Electricity Supply, Professor Stephen Littlechild. Some of the complexities relate to the competitive structure in the industry while others stem from the fact that the electricity industry uses coal, nuclear power and gas as fuels, so that decisions about electricity have enormous consequences for other energy industries. It has become increasingly clear that major decisions have to be taken, going far beyond a simple refereeing role to ensure compliance with the terms of the licence. This role has become controversial, with some critics calling for a different system of regulation, either in the form of a Regulatory Commission or with a revised system incorporating greater democratic accountability. This paper sets out the statutory basis for the Director General of Electricity Supply (DGES) and describes how his powers have been used.
    [Show full text]