Land Resources of the Einasleigh - Atherton Dry Tropics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Land Resources of the Einasleigh - Atherton Dry Tropics QUEENSLAND DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES 0089004 D LAND RESOURCES OF THE EINASLEIGH - ATHERTON DRY TROPICS M. J. Grundy and N. J. Bryde Land Resources Branch Q Department of PrimaryIndustries Queensland Government, Queensland Government Technical Report This report is a scanned copy and some detail may be illegible or lost. Before acting on any information, readers are strongly advised to ensure that numerals, percentages and details are correct. This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1989 For information about this report contact [email protected] Queensland Department of Primary Industries Project Report QO89004 LAND RESOURCES OF THE EINASLEIGH- ATHERTON DRY TROPICS M. J. Grundy and N. J. Bryde Land Resources Branch Department of Primary Industries, Queensland Government Brisbane 1989 ISSN 0727-6281 AGDEX 524 This publication was prepared for Queensland Department of Primary Industries officers. It may be distributed to other interested individuals and organisations. Funds provided under the National Soil Conservation Program to partly fund this project are gratefully acknowledged. © Queensland Government Queensland Department of Primary Industries GPO Box 46 Brisbane 4001 iii ~NTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES iv LIST OF FIGURES iv ABSTRACT V I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background to the study 1.2 The study area 1.3 Previous resource studies . PHYSICAL RESOURCES 6 2.1 Climate 6 2.2 Geology and landform 17 2.3 Vegetation 19 2.4 Water resources 21 . LAND RESOURCE SURVEY METHOD 24 3.1 Terminology 25 . SOIL LANDSCAPE UNITS AND SOIL ASSOCIATIONS 27 . LAND USE 35 5.1 Present land use 35 5.2 Limitations on agriculture 37 . PRIORITY ORDER OF MAP SHEET AREAS 45 . CONCLUSIONS 47 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 49 REFERENCES 49 APPENDIX I Symbols used to derive soil association 52 mapping codes. APPENDIX II Attributes of Great Soil Groups (in 54 alphabetical order). APPENDIX III Collated soil chemical data from 6O commercial enquiries in drier areas of the Einasleigh-Atherton dry tropics. iv LIST OF TABLES Page Table 2.1 Annual rainfall variability index 11 (Vl) for a number of centres. Table 2.2 Mean rainfall per rain day (mm) for 16 a number of centres. Table 2.3 Streamflow attributes for major 22 watercourses. Table 4.1 Soil landscape units and soil 28 associations with major limitations. Table 4.2 Land limitation factors used to assign 33 land suitability classes. Table 5.1 Agricultural management units 38 - their limitations and potential. Table 6.1 Areas of soils in each of the five 46 Land Suitability Classes within I: I00 000 map sheet areas. LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1.1 Dominant land suitability in Queensland 2 and location of the study area (box). Figure 1.2 Major geographical features. Figure 2.1 Average annual rainfall. Figure 2.2 The monthly median rainfall of six centres. Figure 2.3 The Waite Index -~-(r/e 0'') for five 10 centres. Figure 2.4 The probability of receiving varying 12 amounts of rain over a four month period commencing on (a) November I, (b) December I and (c) January I for eleven centres. Figure 2.5 Average monthly maximum and minimum 17 temperatures for Herberton and Mt Surprise. Figure 5.1 Cropped land (1985) in the Einasleigh- 36 Atherton study area. ABSTRACT An exploratory study was undertaken of the land resources of the Atherton and Einasleigh 1:250 000 map sheet areas west of Cairns. The result, an overview of 3.5m ha of the dry tropics, is an aid to the setting of priorities for more intensive resource assessment. The work was funded by the National Soil Conservation Program. Twenty-two soil landscape units consisting of 87 soil associations were identified. Of these, 33 soil associations were considered suitable for rainfed summer grain production with few, slight or moderate limitations. They covered an area of 533 000 ha with 2 981 000 ha unsuitable. Of the suitable soils, soil associations dominated by red earths occupied 166 000 ha, non-calcic brown soils and red podzolic soils 70 500 ha, black earths and grey and brown clays 72 000 ha and various suitable soils on alluvium 46 000 ha. The climate including rainfall which is of moderate reliability is discussed. Research and development needs and degradation hazards are identified. Priorities for further resource survey are assigned based on the twelve 1:100 000 map sheet areas found within the Einasleigh - Atherton dry tropics. 1 • IFfRODUCTION 1.1 Baek~ound to the study Intensive agricultural development in the northern half of Queensland is presently confined to the coastal fringe and adjacent tableland areas• Yet there exists a large area of land in the far north with a significant annual rainfall (greater than 700 ram) which produces store cattle from unimproved pastures• There has long been a perception that appreciable areas of this land have the potential for more intensive use and this was formally recognised in the 'Assessment of the Agricultural and Pastoral Potential of Queensland' (Weston et al. 1981). Sorghum, maize, and, by inference, similar crops were assessed as well adapted to some 1.3m hectares of the far north with soil type, climate and landform as the assessment criteria• This assessment was based on small scale soils mapping (Isbell et al. 1968) with input from local officers of the Queensland Department of Primary Industries (QDPI). This data base was insufficient for providing advice on cropping reliability or assessing the potential for degradation• If more detailed resource information could be obtained prior to extensive development then the adoption of sustainable cropping systems could be encouraged on suitable soil types. Consequently the QDPI sought and received Federal funding through the National Soil Conservation Program (NSCP) for a study into the land resources of the dry tropics• Dry tropics in this study were taken to be tropical areas with a pronounced dry season and consequently a limited growing season• Much of this land has impediments to more intensive use other than those addressed in the Weston et al. (1981) study• These include: • access to existing agricultural infrastructure; • type of land tenure; • source of experienced farmers; and • current economics of site. These are essentially ephemeral criteria but are factors that determine which of the potential cropping areas first comes under development pressure. The study area chosen was the Einasleigh and Atherton I: 250 000 map sheets which adjoin the established agricultural areas around Mareeba and Atherton and which include a large portion of the potentially arable land (Figure I• I)• These sheets cover some 3.5m ha including wet tropical areas outside the scope of the study• These wetter areas, however, were included in the mapping as detailed studies of the agricultural areas were available and could be incorporated without further work. The mapping of complete map sheet areas also has practical advantages• The first stage of the project reported here was an overview of the area to identify the major land resources and enable an assessment of priorities for further more intensive work. The results of earlier QUEENSLAND DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AGRICULTURE BRANCH Adapted from DOMINANT LAND SUITABILITY By J. Harbison and E.J. Weston (1980) F~-~~ ~:: ~,~-,--~_---~-~ Drawn by M.B. Carroll REFERENCE LAND SUITABILITY GROUPS i :i .i!:i : :ii ~ A. P ....... t arable (crop). ,~'.~.~• B. Arable with stabihzing pasture Cairns rotation~ (crop ..... pasture). ~ C. Non-arable except for sown pasture ._ ::~ eslablishment (sown pasture). ~:::i" D. Native past ..... d .... agricultural land. ~z ::~: --_~~~:i % ~.7 ~.~,--~-~:~ ~ ~ _~-~_= ....... -- ~ --~, ~-_- -~-~ ~ ~ ~ ~-~- --~ -<.__,~ - ~ ~ ockhampton ..... ~__. -- ~- ~-~---. __ ~ ~, ....,~-,~--~,..~_:~_~, ~.--- __ ........ ~- ~ ~ \~.'..\ __~ ~.-- ~ ~-'~ -- ~ ~ -= ..........._- _ ___ _:_ ~,~ ;::.:.:~. ..,~ ....: :.: :~,~,~, __,~ ,~ .~ %:~~.-~ ............ ~ .... ~--~ ~_. • ~ .....~. .'.~... "~-.~._'~_~:"~'...~;,2~ ~~-- ~---- -- i-i~~-:~-~::~: .~-- ~L~_ • ~'-~i.i ~ ii i !~ __ .......... .- ~ ............ ,-~ i.. -- --, .-~5 .... ;.~ -- -~ !- -- -- ~-:C/." ." .......... ~ ~__ --~ ~f.., __ --~ --~.~. ~ -- ___~, _ - ........... ~ ~::~ ~y PREPARED BY THE DIVISION OF LAND UTILISATION, D.P.I,, BRISBANE 1981. Figure 1.1 Dominant land suitability in Queensland and location of the study area (box) 3 studies were reviewed and new field work commenced, the intensity of work being dependent on potential agricultural suitability. 1.2 The study area The major population centres, Mareeba, Atherton, Herberton and Ravenshoe (Figure 1.2) are concentrated in the intensive agricultural areas in the north-east of the study area. The more remote centres generally owe their existence to mining with important industries still centred around Greenvale (nickel), Kidston (gold), Mt Garnet (tin) and Chillagoe (formerly copper, now marble, limestone and tourism)• Mt Surprise and Einasleigh
Recommended publications
  • Lower Cretaceous Fossils from the Sources of the Barcoo, Ward And
    LOWER CRETACEOUS FOSSILS FROM THE SOURCE8 OF THE BARCOO, WARD AND NIV E RIVERS SOUTH OENTRAL QUEENSLA~D. PART II.l-CEPHALOPODA. By R. ETHERIDGE, JUNR., Curator. (Plates xxx.-xlix., and Fig. 8.) I.-IN'l'RODUC'l'ION. The" Ammonites" proper contained in Mr. H. \V. Blomfield's collection are few in nnmber', and will be noticed in a later part of this Memoir. The following descriptions of the "Crioceri" are offered with a considerable amsmnt of diffidence, and to arrive at these results I found it impemtive to undertake a general review of our Cretaceous forms hitherto associated with the names CTioceras and Ancylocera8; the outcome of this work, extending over many months, is t~ my mind, I regret to say, anything but satisfactory. This arises from two primary causes, the frag­ mentary state in which the fossils are frequently found, and the difficulty experienced in grouping ~uch portions, from many and "widely separated localities, in well dlefined species. A secondary cause is due to the fact that many of the hitherto described forms are based on portions of shells only, and in two instances at least the descriptions are so inadequate that recognition of the species is practically reduced to gue~s work. In no instance is this more apparent than in that of Cl·iocemB australe, Moore, the Australian type of the group. To render my investigations as complete as possible, I assembled all the specimens of the above two genera within my reach, and drew upon the following collections, as well as onr own :-The Mining and Geological, and Macleay Museums, ~ydney; National Museum, Melbourne; Geological Survey, and Queensland Museums, Brisbane; Geological Survey Collection, Adelaide; and the Sweet Collection, Melbourne.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland
    REPORT TO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT (RID), NORTH REGION ON An Assessment of Agricultural Potential of Soils in the Gulf Region, North Queensland Volume 1 February 1999 Peter Wilson (Land Resource Officer, Land Information Management) Seonaid Philip (Senior GIS Technician) Department of Natural Resources Resource Management GIS Unit Centre for Tropical Agriculture 28 Peters Street, Mareeba Queensland 4880 DNRQ990076 Queensland Government Technical Report This report is intended to provide information only on the subject under review. There are limitations inherent in land resource studies, such as accuracy in relation to map scale and assumptions regarding socio-economic factors for land evaluation. Before acting on the information conveyed in this report, readers should ensure that they have received adequate professional information and advice specific to their enquiry. While all care has been taken in the preparation of this report neither the Queensland Government nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result from any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein. © State of Queensland 1999 For information about this report contact [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors thank the input of staff of the Department of Natural Resources GIS Unit Mareeba. Also that of DNR water resources staff, particularly Mr Jeff Benjamin. Mr Steve Ockerby, Queensland Department of Primary Industries provided invaluable expertise and advice for the development of the agricultural suitability assessment. Mr Phil Bierwirth of the Australian Geological Survey Organisation (AGSO) provided an introduction to and knowledge of Airborne Gamma Spectrometry. Assistance with the interpretation of AGS data was provided through the Department of Natural Resources Enhanced Resource Assessment project.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula
    CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY LAND USE PROGRAM SURFACE WATER RESOURCES OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA A.M. Horn Queensland Department of Primary Industries 1995 r .am1, a DEPARTMENT OF, PRIMARY 1NDUSTRIES CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY (CYPLUS) Land Use Program SURFACE WATER RESOURCES OF CAPE YORK PENINSULA A.M.Horn Queensland Department of Primary Industries CYPLUS is a joint initiative of the Queensland and Commonwealth Governments Recommended citation: Horn. A. M (1995). 'Surface Water Resources of Cape York Peninsula'. (Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy, Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland, Brisbane, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra and Queensland Department of Primary Industries.) Note: Due to the timing of publication, reports on other CYPLUS projects may not be fully cited in the BIBLIOGRAPHY section. However, they should be able to be located by author, agency or subject. ISBN 0 7242 623 1 8 @ The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia 1995. Copyright protects this publication. Except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act 1968, - no part may be reproduced by any means without the prior written permission of the Office of the Co-ordinator General of Queensland and the Australian Government Publishing Service. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Office of the Co-ordinator General, Government of Queensland PO Box 185 BRISBANE ALBERT STREET Q 4002 The Manager, Commonwealth Information Services GPO Box 84 CANBERRA ACT 2601 CAPE YORK PENINSULA LAND USE STRATEGY STAGE I PREFACE TO PROJECT REPORTS Cape York Peninsula Land Use Strategy (CYPLUS) is an initiative to provide a basis for public participation in planning for the ecologically sustainable development of Cape York Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • A Re-Examination of William Hann´S Northern Expedition of 1872 to Cape York Peninsula, Queensland
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Historical Records of Australian Science, 2021, 32, 67–82 https://doi.org/10.1071/HR20014 A re-examination of William Hann’s Northern Expedition of 1872 to Cape York Peninsula, Queensland Peter Illingworth TaylorA and Nicole Huxley ACorresponding author. Email: [email protected] William Hann’s Northern Expedition set off on 26 June 1872 from Mount Surprise, a pastoral station west of Townsville, to determine the mineral and agricultural potential of Cape York Peninsula. The expedition was plagued by disharmony and there was later strong criticism of the leadership and its failure to provide any meaningful analysis of the findings. The authors (a descendent of Norman Taylor, expedition geologist, and a descendent of Jerry, Indigenous guide and translator) use documentary sources and traditional knowledge to establish the role of Jerry in the expedition. They argue that while Hann acknowledged Jerry’s assistance to the expedition, his role has been downplayed by later commentators. Keywords: botany, explorers, geology, indigenous history, palaeontology. Published online 27 November 2020 Introduction research prominence. These reinterpretations of history not only highlight the cultural complexity of exploration, but they also During the nineteenth century, exploration for minerals, grazing demonstrate the extent to which Indigenous contributions were and agricultural lands was widespread in Australia, with expedi- obscured or deliberately removed from exploration accounts.4 tions organised through private, public and/or government spon- William Hann’s Northern Expedition to Cape York Peninsula sorship. Poor leadership and conflicting aspirations were common, was not unique in experiencing conflict and failing to adequately and the ability of expedition members to cooperate with one another acknowledge the contributions made by party members, notably in the face of hardships such as food and water shortages, illness and Jerry, Aboriginal guide and interpreter.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21
    Surface Water Ambient Network (Water Quality) 2020-21 July 2020 This publication has been compiled by Natural Resources Divisional Support, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2020 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Summary This document lists the stream gauging stations which make up the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy (DNRME) surface water quality monitoring network. Data collected under this network are published on DNRME’s Water Monitoring Information Data Portal. The water quality data collected includes both logged time-series and manual water samples taken for later laboratory analysis. Other data types are also collected at stream gauging stations, including rainfall and stream height. Further information is available on the Water Monitoring Information Data Portal under each station listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands of the Mitchell-Normanby Area, Queensland
    IMPORTANT NOTICE © Copyright Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (‘CSIRO’) Australia. All rights are reserved and no part of this publication covered by copyright may be reproduced or copied in any form or by any means except with the written permission of CSIRO Division of Land and Water. The data, results and analyses contained in this publication are based on a number of technical, circumstantial or otherwise specified assumptions and parameters. The user must make its own assessment of the suitability for its use of the information or material contained in or generated from the publication. To the extend permitted by law, CSIRO excludes all liability to any person or organisation for expenses, losses, liability and costs arising directly or indirectly from using this publication (in whole or in part) and any information or material contained in it. The publication must not be used as a means of endorsement without the prior written consent of CSIRO. NOTE This report and accompanying maps are scanned and some detail may be illegible or lost. Before acting on this information, readers are strongly advised to ensure that numerals, percentages and details are correct. This digital document is provided as information by the Department of Natural Resources and Water under agreement with CSIRO Division of Land and Water and remains their property. All enquiries regarding the content of this document should be referred to CSIRO Division of Land and Water. The Department of Natural Resources and Water nor its officers or staff accepts any responsibility for any loss or damage that may result in any inaccuracy or omission in the information contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Indexes to Correspondence Relating to Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in the Records
    Indexes to correspondence relating to Aborigines and Torres Strait Islanders in the records of the Colonial Secretary’s Office and the Home Secretary’s Office 1896 – 1903. Queensland State Archives Item ID 6820 88/4149 (this top letter is missing) Letter number: 88/328 Microfilm Z1604, Microfilm frame numbers 3-4 contain a copy of the original letter. The original is contained on frames 5-6. Letter from the Reverend GJ Richner on behalf of the Committee for the Lutheran Mission of South Australia. He acknowledges receipt of the Colonial Secretary's letter advising that CA Meyer and FG Pfalser have been appointed trustees of Bloomfield River Mission Station (Wujal Wujal). He also asks for government support for both Bloomfield River and Cape Bedford Mission stations. He suggests that "It is really too much for the Mission Societies to spend the collections of poor Christians for to feed the natives". A note on letter 88/328 advises "10 pounds per month for 12 months". Queensland State Archives Item ID 6820 88/4149 (this top letter is missing) Letter number: 88/4058 Microfilm Z1604, Microfilm frame numbers 8-9 contain a copy of the original letter. (The original is contained on frames 10-11). Letter from the Reverend GJ Richner thanking the Colonial Secretary for the allowance of 10 pounds per month for Cape Bedford and Bloomfield River Mission Stations. He suggests, however, that the 10 pounds is "fully required" for the Cape Bedford Mission Station and asks for further funding to support Bloomfield River Mission Station. Queensland State Archives Item ID 6820 88/9301 (this top letter is missing) Letter number: 87/7064 Microfilm Z1604, Microfilm frame numbers 14-15.
    [Show full text]
  • 494 JAMES VENTURE MULLIGAN Prospector and Explorer of the North
    494 JAMES VENTURE MULLIGAN Prospector and Explorer of the North [By GLENVILLE PIKE] (Written for the Monthly General Meeting of the His­ torical Society of Queensland, Inc., on 26th April 1951). James Venture Mulligan is a man whose deeds are not known to many. Yet he was probably North Queensland's greatest explorer and prospector—a man who did more than anyone else to open up the vast mineral areas of Cape York Peninsula and the hinter­ land of Cairns. In this paper I propose to tell you, as briefly as I can, about Mulligan's work—briefly because the full story would fiU a book if sufficient time was spent in sorting out the many records and old newspaper re­ ports that survive—relics of the days when Mulligan's discoveries were big news. Mulligan made six expeditions between 1873 and 1876 and on only one of them did he receive financial help from the Government. His arduous journeys were made at his own expense, spurred on only by his urge of discovering something of value to the community, and to open up the then wild Northern lands of which this brave man was so much a part. He was a bom leader of men. In a wider field he could have become Australia's greatest explorer. This year is the seventy-fifth anniversary of Mul­ ligan's discovery of payable gold on the Hodgkinson; the founding of Cairns followed within six months. This October, the anniversary is being celebrated in Cairns in conjunction with the Jubilee of Federation, but few will pause to remember Mulligan as the man who blazed the way for the pioneers of Cairns to foUow.
    [Show full text]
  • The XPD Extreme Adventure Story by Matt Shields
    The XPD Extreme Adventure Story by Matt Shields Parramatta Cycling Club Home About Us Join the Club News Racing Results Club Clothing Gallery Club Trophies Contact Us » Home » Print » Sitemap » Contact Us The XPD Extreme Adventure Story by Matt Shields Robert Shields, Cairns North Queensland, Thursday, 24 June 2010 XPD Cairns 2010 race report by Matt Shields Location: Somewhere on the slightly dodgy side of Cairns. There is a sign that says “Press buzzer and wait to be let in!” Upon gaining access we make our way past the rows of shotguns, laser scopes and countless boxes of ammunition. My thoughts were if anyone is going to know what lurks in the Queensland outback these are the guys to be talking to. But let me take it back a few days and go from there. Saturday 15th May After 9 months of preparation and countless training sessions I’m ready for the big adventure, the Cairns XPD adventure race. Team number 20 Aberdeen Australia is a quartet of highly motivated and skilled adventure racers taking on the world’s best in Australia’s biggest and hardest adventure race. Danielle Winslow, Gary Lilley, Toby Wallace and I make up the team. By Saturday afternoon the four of us have made it to Cairns. After checking into our accommodation we go to race Head Quarters to collect all our equipment trunks that were shipped up from Sydney. Several hours later the hotel staff were unable to locate our trunks, big problem. No gear = No race! We head off to dinner quite concerned and angry that our race may have hit its first road block before it has even started.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental DNA Survey of Eureka Creek, Upper Mitchell and Walsh River for Two Invasive Tilapia Species
    Environmental DNA survey of Eureka Creek, Upper Mitchell and Walsh River for two invasive tilapia species Report by Richard C. Edmunds, Madalyn Cooper, Roger Luerlimann, Heather Robson and Damien Burrows © James Cook University, 2019 Environmental DNA survey of Eureka Creek, Upper Mitchell, and Walsh River for invasive Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae (November 2017) is licensed by James Cook University for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This report should be cited as: Edmunds, R.C., Cooper, M., Huerlimann, R., Robson, H., and Burrows, D. 2019. Environmental DNA survey of Eureka Creek, Upper Mitchell, and Walsh River for invasive Oreochromis mossambicus and Tilapia mariae (November 2017). Report 19/06, Centre for Tropical Water and Aquatic Ecosystem Research (TropWATER), James Cook University, Townsville Cover photographs: Front cover: eDNA sampling in the Walsh River (photo Heather Robson). Back cover: Walsh River and Eureka Creek junction (photo Madalyn Cooper). This report is available for download from the Northern Australia Environmental Resources (NAER) Hub website at nespnorthern.edu.au The Hub is supported through funding from the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program (NESP). The NESP NAER Hub is hosted by Charles Darwin University. ISBN 978-1-925800-38-8 March, 2019 Printed by Uniprint Contents Acronyms...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Statistical Analysis of Flood Hydrology and Bankfull Discharge for the Mitchell River Catchment, Queensland, Australia Paul Rustomji
    A statistical analysis of flood hydrology and bankfull discharge for the Mitchell River catchment, Queensland, Australia Paul Rustomji January 2010 Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Report series ISSN: 1835-095X Australia is founding its future on science and innovation. Its national science agency, CSIRO, is a powerhouse of ideas, technologies and skills. CSIRO initiated the National Research Flagships to address Australia’s major research challenges and opportunities. They apply large scale, long term, multidisciplinary science and aim for widespread adoption of solutions. The Flagship Collaboration Fund supports the best and brightest researchers to address these complex challenges through partnerships between CSIRO, universities, research agencies and industry. The Water for a Healthy Country Flagship aims to achieve a tenfold increase in the economic, social and environmental benefits from water by 2025. The work contained in this report is collaboration between CSIRO and the Tropical Rivers and Coastal Knowledge (TRaCK) research program. For more information about Water for a Healthy Country Flagship or the National Research Flagship Initiative visit www.csiro.au/org/HealthyCountry.html TRaCK brings together leading tropical river researchers and managers from Charles Darwin University, Griffith University, University of Western Australia, CSIRO, James Cook University, Australian National University, Geoscience Australia, Environ- mental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Australian Institute of Marine Science, North
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Water Network Review Final Report
    Surface Water Network Review Final Report 16 July 2018 This publication has been compiled by Operations Support - Water, Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy. © State of Queensland, 2018 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Interpreter statement: The Queensland Government is committed to providing accessible services to Queenslanders from all culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. If you have difficulty in understanding this document, you can contact us within Australia on 13QGOV (13 74 68) and we will arrange an interpreter to effectively communicate the report to you. Surface
    [Show full text]