Final Transferability Report (Draft)
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Final transferability Report (Draft) D 3.4 .2 Version N°1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................6 1.1. Background ................................................................................................6 1.1.1. MOBILIS..............................................................................................................6 1.2. The Project Consortium Cities ....................................................................7 1.3. The Project Objectives ..............................................................................11 1.3.1. General objectives...............................................................................................11 1.4. Overview of the Measures .........................................................................12 1.5. Structure of this report .............................................................................13 2. APPROACH TO EVALUATION AND TRANSFERABILITY IN MOBILIS ..............................................................................................15 2.1. Evaluation approach .................................................................................15 2.2. Transferability approach ..........................................................................15 2.2.1. Methodology.......................................................................................................15 2.2.2. Transferability role and tasks in MOBILIS.........................................................16 2.3. Selected measures .....................................................................................17 3. TRANSFERABLE MEASURES ............................................................18 3.1. City 1: Toulouse ........................................................................................18 3.1.1. MOBILIS in Toulouse........................................................................................18 3.1.2. Toulouse Objectives and Targets........................................................................21 3.2. Measures Transferability results for Toulouse ..........................................22 3.2.1. Measure 6.1: New parking management in Toulouse.........................................22 3.2.2. Measure 11.4: Commuter and administration mobility plans in Toulouse .........26 3.2.3. Measure 12.3: Development of an integrated multimodal traveller information system in Toulouse 30 3.3. City 2: DEBRECEN ..................................................................................34 3.3.1. Measures implemented .......................................................................................35 3.3.2. Debrecen; Objectives and Targets ......................................................................35 3.4. Measure Transferability Results for the City of Debrecen.........................36 3.4.1. Measure 12.4: Tramway public transport priority scheme and real-time passenger information system 36 3.5. City 3 : LJUBLJANA ................................................................................38 3.5.1. MOBILIS in Ljubljana .......................................................................................39 3.5.2. Measures implemented: ......................................................................................39 3.5.3. Ljubljana; Objectives and Targets ......................................................................39 3.6. Measure Transferability Results for the City of Ljubljana ........................40 3.6.1. Measure 5.4: Implementation and large-scale deployment of bio-diesel and CNG fleets in Ljubljana 40 3.7. City 5: ODENSE .......................................................................................44 3.7.1. MOBILIS in Odense...........................................................................................45 3.7.2. Measures implemented: ......................................................................................45 3.7.3. Odense: Objectives and Targets..........................................................................46 3.8. Measure Results for City of Odense ..........................................................46 3.8.1. Measure 6.10: Environmental zones...................................................................47 3.8.2. Measure 11.10.0: Interactive traffic training for children in Odense..................49 3.9. City 4: VENICE ........................................................................................52 3.9.1. MOBILIS in Venice ...........................................................................................53 3.9.2. Measures implemented: ......................................................................................56 3.9.3. Venice: Objectives and Targets ..........................................................................56 3.10. Measure transferability Results for City of Venice ....................................57 3.10.1. Measure 6.8: Access management for the city centre in Venice-LTZ buses.......57 3.10.2. Measure 9.4: Expansion and diversification of the car-sharing scheme in Venice61 3.10.3. Measure 11.9: Promotion of safe and increased bicycle use in Venice. .............65 4. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................68 4.1. Introduction ..............................................................................................68 4.2. Transferability ..........................................................................................68 4.3. Conclusions ...............................................................................................68 A1: City of Toulouse ............................................................................................70 A 2 : City of Debrecen .........................................................................................71 A2.1 Measure 12.4 Real time passenger information and tram priority............................71 Transferability analysis......................................................................................................71 A 3 : City of Ljubljana .........................................................................................75 A 4 : City of Odense .............................................................................................75 A4.1 Measure 6.10 – Environmental zones ...........................................................75 A4.2 Measure 11.10 –Traffic training for children ...............................................78 A 5: City of Venice ...............................................................................................81 A5.1 Measure 6.8 Access management for the city centre in Venice – LTZ buses .81 4.4. Attributes .................................................................................................81 D5.2 Measure 9.4: Expansion and diversification of the car-sharing scheme in Venice .................................................................................................................84 D5.3 Measure 11.9: Promotion of safe and increased bicycle use in Venice ...........86 4.5. Attributes .................................................................................................86 4.6. A. Components .........................................................................................86 List of Figures Figure 1: Toulouse conburbation –source: Google earth ................................................................ 19 Figure 2: Resident pricing areas at the end of 2007...................................................................................... 24 Figure 3: Business areas concerned by commuter plans in Toulouse conurbation .............................. 27 Figure 4: information panel................................................................................................................... 31 Figure 5: The tramline of Debrecen, and the major crossed junctions ................................................. 37 Figure 6: testing bench in Maribor........................................................................................................ 42 Figure 7: 1+2 Environmental housing areas, 3 Environmental city zone, 4 Odense Harbour.............. 45 List of tables Glossary of Terms ABS Anti-lock Braking System AIS Agricultural Institute of Slovenia ADAS Advanced Driver Assistance systems Association française de normalisation (French national AFNOR standardisation authority) AKS Automatic Kick-down system ARS System ASC Automatic Stability Centre ASM Azienda Servizi per la Mobilità (Mobility service Agency) ASR Anti-slip Regulation AVL Automatic Vehicle Detection BAU Business as usual BRT Bus Rapid T ransit CAC CIVITAS Advisory Committee CIVITAS CI ty–VITA lity–Sustainability CO Carbon monoxide CNG Compressed natural gas CR Coordinator responsible DKV Debrecen Transport Company DM Dissemination manager DRT Demand Responsive Transport EGNOS European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service ELG Evaluation liaison group EM Evaluation manager Electronic Stability Program ESP GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System, also called NAVSTAR system GPS Global Positioning System GUARD HQB High Quality bus corridor IAR Interim activity report ID Partner identification Digit IP Implementation plan IPR Internal progress report IPT Internal transferability potential ITS Intelligent transport systems K&R Kiss and ride LDM Local dissemination manager LEM Local evaluation manager LPG Liquid petroleum