DOCSLIB.ORG

Dissertation SS Final2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dissertation SS Final2 FACULTY OF HUMANITIES, SOCIAL SCIENCES AND EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTICS Asymmetries in Linguistic Construal Russian Prefixes and the Locative Alternation Svetlana Sokolova A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor May 2012 Asymmetries in Linguistic Construal Russian Prefixes and the Locative Alternation Svetlana Sokolova A thesis submitted for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor University of Tromsø Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education Department of Language and Linguistics CLEAR group: Cognitive Linguistics: Empirical Approaches to Russian May 2012 CONTENTS Acknowledgements ................................................................................ vii 1. Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 1.1. The notion of construal ............................................................................ 3 1.1.1. Classes of construal phenomena ....................................................... 3 1.1.2. Construal and asymmetry ................................................................. 5 1.2. Organization of the dissertation ............................................................... 7 I. BACKGROUND AND THEORETICAL ISSUES ........................................... 9 2. Main Approaches to the Locative Alternation ................................. 9 2.1. Terminology overview ............................................................................. 9 2.2. Early Approaches to the Locative Alternation ....................................... 11 Fillmore ......................................................................................................... 11 2.3. Lexical Approaches ................................................................................ 13 Pinker and Levin ........................................................................................... 13 2.3.1. Pinker’s Lexical Rule Approach ..................................................... 13 2.3.1.1. The analysis of verbal semantics within the Lexical approach. Conflation classes. ................................................................................ 13 2.3.1.2. The interaction between verbal semantics and syntax within the Lexical approach. Linking rules and Lexical rule ................................ 15 2.3.1.3. The relation between the two syntactic structures within the Lexical approach .................................................................................. 17 2.3.1.4. Problems with the Lexical Approach ...................................... 18 2.3.2. Levin’s Projectionist Approach ...................................................... 20 2.3.2.1. The analysis of verbal semantics within Levin’s Projectionist Approach. Basic event structure. .......................................................... 20 2.3.2.2. The interaction between verbal semantics and syntax within Levin’s Projectionist Approach. Template augmentation. ................... 21 2.3.2.3. Problems with Levin’s Projectionist Approach. ...................... 22 2.4. Constructional approaches ..................................................................... 23 Goldberg, Boas, Iwata, Lewandowski .......................................................... 23 iv CONTENTS 2.4.1. Goldberg’s Constructional Approach ............................................. 23 2.4.1.1. The nature of the two syntactic structures within Goldberg’s Constructional Approach. ..................................................................... 23 2.4.1.2. The interaction between verbal semantics and syntax within Goldberg’s Constructional Approach. The Semantic Coherence Principle and the Correspondence Principle ......................................... 24 2.4.1.3. Problems with Goldberg’s Constructional Approach .............. 27 2.4.2. Boas’s Frame-semantic Approach .................................................. 28 2.4.2.1. The analysis of verbal semantics within Boas’s Frame-Semantic Approach. Levels of verb Descriptivity. ............................................... 28 2.4.2.2. The nature of the two syntactic structures within Boas’ Frame- Semantic Approach. Constructions vs. frames ..................................... 29 2.4.2.3. Problems with Boas’s Frame-Semantic Approach .................. 30 2.4.3. Iwata’s Lexical-constructional Approach ....................................... 31 2.4.3.1. The analysis of verbal semantics within Iwata’s Lexical- constructional Approach. L-Meaning vs. P-Meaning. .......................... 31 2.4.3.2. The nature of the two syntactic structures within Iwata’s Lexical-constructional Approach. The Hierarchy of constructions ...... 35 2.4.3.3. Problems with Iwata’s Lexical-constructional Approach. ....... 36 2.4.4. Lewandowski’s Constructional Approach ...................................... 36 2.4.4.1. The analysis of verbal semantics within Lewandowski’s Constructional Approach. Three-member classification. ..................... 36 2.4.4.2. Problems with Lewandowski’s Constructional Approach ...... 39 2.4.5. Semantics of verbs and Constructions in the present study ............ 40 3. Main Approaches to Prefixes in Russian ........................................ 49 3.1. An Overview of the Russian Aspectual System ..................................... 49 3.1.1. Grammatical Aspect in Russian ...................................................... 49 3.1.2. Types of Perfective Verbs ............................................................... 50 3.1.3. “Empty” prefixes and Aspectual Pairs ............................................ 52 3.1.3.1. The Notion of “Empty” Prefixes ............................................. 52 3.1.3.2. Criteria for determining “aspectual pairs” ............................... 53 3.1.3.3. Opponents to the idea of “empty prefixes” .............................. 56 3.2. An Overview of the Prefixes NA-, ZA-, PO- ......................................... 58 3.2.1. The Semantics of the Prefix NA- ..................................................... 58 3.2.2. The Semantics of the Prefix ZA- ..................................................... 59 3.2.3. The Semantics of the Prefix PO- .................................................... 63 3.3. The Locative Alternation and Prefixes ................................................... 67 3.3.1. Prefixes as Part of the Verbal Root ................................................. 67 3.3.2. Prefixes as Part of Construction ...................................................... 69 CONTENTS v 4. Constructions ..................................................................................... 73 4.1. Typology of the Locative Alternation constructions .............................. 73 4.1.1. Constructions 1 and 2: Theme-Object Construction vs. Goal-Object Construction .............................................................................................. 75 4.1.2 Construction 3: Theme-Subject construction .................................. 76 4.1.3 Construction 4: Impersonal construction ......................................... 76 4.1.4 Construction 5: Hybrid construction ................................................ 80 4.1.5. Construction 6: Decausative construction ...................................... 82 4.2. Modifications of Constructions .............................................................. 83 4.2.2. Metaphorical extensions ................................................................. 83 4.2.3 Reduced constructions ..................................................................... 86 4.2.4. Elaboration and Hybrid constructions ............................................ 87 4.3. Summary ................................................................................................ 90 II. CONSTRUCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE RUSSIAN LOCATIVE ALTERNATION VERBS WITH THE PREFIXES NA-, ZA- AND PO- ............. 93 5. Methodology ....................................................................................... 93 5.1. Database Description .............................................................................. 93 5.2. Methods .................................................................................................. 98 5.2.1. Constructional Profiling .................................................................. 98 5.2.2. Statistical Analysis ........................................................................ 100 6. Alternating verbs with NPs ............................................................ 101 6.1. The verb GRUZIT’ ‘load’ .................................................................... 101 6.1.1. Binary regression model ............................................................... 102 6.1.2. Non-passive forms of gruzit’ ‘load’ and its Natural Perfectives .. 104 6.1.3. Passive forms of gruzit’ ‘load’ and its Natural Perfectives .......... 106 6.1.4. Reduction ...................................................................................... 109 6.2. The verb MAZAT’ ‘daub, smear’ ........................................................ 113 6.2.1. Non-passive forms of mazat’ ‘daub, smear’ and its Natural Perfectives ............................................................................................... 113 6.2.2. Passive forms of mazat’ ‘daub, smear’ and its Natural Perfectives ............................................................................................... 121 6.2.3. Reduction .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Elena Ulyanova – Biography
    Piano Jack Price Founding Partner / Managing Director Marc Parella Partner / Director of Operations Brenna Sluiter Marketing Operations Manager Karrah Cambry Opera and Special Projects Manager Mailing Address: 520 Geary Street Suite 605 San Francisco CA 94102 Telephone: Contents: Toll-Free 1-866-PRI-RUBI (774-7824) 310-254-7149 / Los Angeles Biography 415-504-3654 / San Francisco Reviews & Testimonials Skype: pricerubent | marcparella Repertoire Email: Short Notice Concertos [email protected] CD/DVDs [email protected] Recordings Curriculum Vitae Website: http://www.pricerubin.com Complete artist information including video, audio Yahoo!Messenger and interviews are available at www.pricerubin.com pricerubin Elena Ulyanova – Biography Praised as "a phenomenal, gifted performer" by Roy Gillinson of the Beethoven Society of America, Elena Ulyanova is a pianist whose style runs the gamut of power, strength, and technique to a delicate, floating elegant finesse. Hailed by the Moscow Conservatory as one of their most gifted musicians, her Professor Victor Merzhanov noted that she possesses "Great virtuosity, brilliant artistic temperament, unique interpretive expression and a rich sound pallet." At the age of 5, Elena Ulyanova began to study piano with her mother, Larisa Ulyanova, in Saki, Ukraine. After winning several first prizes in Ukrainian and Russian competitions, she was awarded full scholarships for study in Moscow at Gnessin College of Music, Gnessin Academy of Music, and Moscow Tchaikovsky Conservatory. While at Gnessin Academy, she won the Momontov competition, which also resulted in tours of Russia, Bulgaria, and Romania. She was also awarded a tour of Austria, along with the best students representing Gnessin Academy, which included Alexander Kobrin.
    [Show full text]
  • — 2004 T&FN Women's World Rankings —
    — 2004 T&FN Women’s World Rankings — 100 METERS 800 METERS 5000 METERS 1. Yuliya Nesterenko (Belarus) 1. Kelly Holmes (Great Britain) 1. Meseret Defar (Ethiopia) 2. Veronica Campbell (Jamaica) 2. Jolanda Ceplak (Slovenia) 2. Elvan Abeylegesse (Turkey) 3. Aleen Bailey (Jamaica) 3. Hasna Benhassi (Morocco) 3. Isabella Ochichi (Kenya) 4. Lauryn Williams (US) 4. Maria Mutola (Mozambique) 4. Tirunesh Dibaba (Ethiopia) 5. Christine Arron (France) 5. Jearl Miles Clark (US) 5. Ejegayehu Dibaba (Ethiopia) 6. Debbie Ferguson (Bahamas) 6. Tatyana Andrianova (Russia) 6. Berhane Adere (Ethiopia) 7. Ivet Lalova (Bulgaria) 7. Svetlana Cherkasova (Russia) 7. Edith Masai (Kenya) 8. Sherone Simpson (Jamaica) 8. Zulia Calatayud (Cuba) 8. Werknesh Kidane (Ethiopia) 9. LaTasha Colander (US) 9. Amina Aït Hammou (Morocco) 9. Paula Radcliffe (Great Britain) 10. Kim Gevaert (Belgium) 10. Nicole Teter (US) 10. Yelena Zadorozhnaya (Russia) 200 METERS 1500 METERS 10,000 METERS 1. Veronica Campbell (Jamaica) 1. Kelly Holmes (Great Britain) 1. Huina Xing (China) 2. Allyson Felix (US) 2. Tatyana Tomashova (Russia) 2. Ejegayehu Dibaba (Ethiopia) 3. Debbie Ferguson (Bahamas) 3. Olga Yegorova (Russia) 3. Derartu Tulu (Ethiopia) 4. Aleen Bailey (Jamaica) 4. Natalya Yevdokimova (Russia) 4. Werknesh Kidane (Ethiopia) 5. Ivet Lalova (Bulgaria) 5. Yelena Zadorozhnaya (Russia) 5. Lornah Kiplagat (Holland) 6. Kim Gevaert (Belgium) 6. Lidia Chojecka (Poland) 6. Paula Radcliffe (Great Britain) 7. Muna Lee (US) 7. Maria Cioncan (Romania) 7. Yingjie Sun (China) 8. Abi Oyepitan (Great Britain) 8. Carmen Douma-Hussar (Canada) 8. Jelena Prokopcuka (Latvia) 9. Cydonie Mothersill (Cayman 9. Wioletta Janowska (Poland) 9. Lidiya Grigoryeva (Russia) Islands) 10. Natalia Rodríguez (Spain) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • BOCK C08 0321570448 Pp3.Qxd 11/21/08 5:01 PM Page 192
    BOCK_C08_0321570448 pp3.qxd 11/21/08 5:01 PM Page 192 192 CHAPTER 8 Linear Regression REGRESSION ON THE COMPUTER All statistics packages make a table of results for a regression. These tables may differ slightly from one package to another, but all are essentially the same—and all include much more than we need to know for now. Every computer regression table includes a section that looks something like this: R squared The “dependent,” response, or Standard y -variable dev of residuals Dependent variable is: Total Fat R squared = 69.0% ( s e) Finding Least Squares s = 9.277 Lines. We almost always use technology to find regressions. Variable Coefficient SE(Coeff) t-ratio P-value Practice now—just in time for Intercept 6.83077 2.664 2.56 0.0158 the exercises. Protein 0.971381 0.1209 8.04 #0.0001 The slope The “independent,” predictor, or We'll deal with all of x -variable The intercept these later in the book. You may ignore them for now. The slope and intercept coefficient are given in a table such as this one. Usually the slope is labeled with the name of the x-variable, and the intercept is labeled “Intercept” or “Constant.” So the regression equation shown here is Fat = 6.83077 + 0.97138Protein. It is not unusual for statistics packages to give many more digits of the estimated slope and intercept than could possibly be estimated from the data. (The original data were reported to the nearest gram.) Ordinarily, you should round most of the reported numbers to one digit more than the precision of the data, and the slope to two.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 European Championships Statistics – Women's 100M
    2014 European Championships Statistics – Women’s 100m by K Ken Nakamura All time performance list at the European Championships Performance Performer Time Wind Name Nat Pos Venue Year 1 1 10.73 2.0 Christine Arron FRA 1 Budapest 1998 2 10.81 1.3 Christine Arron 1sf1 Budapest 1998 3 2 10.83 2.0 Irina Privalova RUS 2 Budapest 1998 4 3 10.87 2.0 Ekaterini Thanou GRE 3 Budapest 1998 5 4 10.89 1.8 Katrin Krabbe GDR 1 Split 1990 6 5 10.91 0.8 Marlies Göhr GDR 1 Stuttgart 1986 7 10.92 0.9 Ekaterini Thanou 1sf2 Budapest 1998 7 6 10.92 2.0 Zhanna Pintusevich -Block UKR 4 Budapest 1998 9 10.98 1.2 Marlies Göhr 1sf2 Stuttgart 1986 10 11.00 1.3 Zhanna Pintusevich -Block 2sf1 Budapest 1998 11 11.01 -0.5 Marlies Göhr 1 Athinai 1982 11 11.01 0.9 Zhanna Pintusevich -Block 1h2 Helsinki 1994 13 11.02 0.6 Irina Privalova 1 Helsinki 1994 13 11.02 0.9 Irina Privalova 2sf2 Budapest 1998 15 7 11.04 0.8 Anelia Nuneva BUL 2 Stuttgart 1986 15 11.04 0.6 Ekaterini Thanou 1h4 Budapest 1998 17 8 11.05 1.2 Silke Gladisch -Möller GDR 2sf2 Stuttgart 1986 17 11.05 0.3 Ekaterini Thanou 1sf2 München 2002 19 11.06 -0.1 Marlies Göhr 1h2 Stuttgart 1986 19 11.06 -0.8 Zhanna Pintusevich -Block 1h1 Budapest 1998 19 9 11.06 1.8 Kim Gevaert BEL 1 Göteborg 2006 22 10 11.06 1.7 Ivet Lalova BUL 1h2 Helsinki 2012 22 11.07 0.0 Katrin Krabbe 1h1 Split 1990 22 11 11.07 2.0 Melanie Paschke GER 5 Budapest 1998 25 11.07 0.3 Ekaterini Thanou 1h4 München 2002 25 11.08 1.2 Anelia Nuneva 3sf2 Stuttga rt 1986 27 12 11.08 0.8 Nelli Cooman NED 3 Stuttgart 1986 28 11.09 0.8 Silke Gladisch -Möller
    [Show full text]
  • Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Technology
    THE ROUTLEDGE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGY The Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Technology provides a state-of-the art survey of the field of computer-assisted translation. It is the first definitive reference to provide a comprehensive overview of the general, regional and topical aspects of this increasingly significant area of study. The Encyclopedia is divided into three parts: • Part One presents general issues in translation technology, such as its history and development, translator training and various aspects of machine translation, including a valuable case study of its teaching at a major university. • Part Two discusses national and regional developments in translation technology, offering contributions covering the crucial territories of China, Canada, France, Hong Kong, Japan, South Africa, Taiwan, the Netherlands and Belgium, the United Kingdom and the United States. • Part Three evaluates specific matters in translation technology, with entries focused on subjects such as alignment, bitext, computational lexicography, corpus, editing, online translation, subtitling and technology and translation management systems. The Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Technology draws on the expertise of over 50 contributors from around the world and an international panel of consultant editors to provide a selection of articles on the most pertinent topics in the discipline. All the articles are self-contained, extensively cross-referenced, and include useful and up-to-date references and information for further reading. It will be an invaluable reference work for anyone with a professional or academic interest in the subject. Chan Sin-wai is Professor in the Department of Translation at The Chinese University of Hong Kong. His research interests include computer translation, translation studies and lexicography.
    [Show full text]
  • Lists N.No 42, All, 2002
    2002 IAAF World Indoor Lists No 42 updated as at 30 August 2002 Compiled by Ottavio Castellini Legenda IAAF Statistics & Documentation Manager A altitude h heat qf quarter-final Amendments will be gratefully received by sf semi-final Ottavio Castellini f final (E-mail address : [email protected]) r race Tel. (+377) 93 10 88 72 c competition Fax (+377) 93 25 09 00 q qualification = ex-aequo Monaco, 4 September 2002, 2 P.M. jo jump off jun junior pen pentathlon hep heptathlon dec decathlon U20 Under 20 U23 Under 23 ope open ext extra Inv Invitational Uni University Col Collegiate HS High School * = world record awaiting ratification IAAF Competitions Department MEN MEN 50 METRES ( WR 5.56 Donovan Bailey CAN Reno, NV, 09 Feb 1996 ) 55 METRES 5.62 Morne Nagel RSA 23 Mar 1978 1+h1 Liévin 24 Feb 2002 6.24 Aaron Armstrong USA 14 Oct 1977 2 Gainesville, FL 28 Feb 2002 5.62 Morne Nagel 1+ Liévin 24 Feb 2002 6.25 Anson Henry CAN 09 Mar 1979 1 Cheney, WA 19 Jan 2002 5.66 Brian Lewis USA 05 Dec 1974 2+h1 Liévin 24 Feb 2002 6.26 Eugene Lee USA 1983 2 r3 Boone, NC 06 Dec 2001 5.67 Gregory Saddler USA 29 Jun 1974 2+ Liévin 24 Feb 2002 6.26 DeMario Wesley USA 20 Apr 1980 1 r8 Lubbock, TX 25 Jan 2002 5.69 Nicolas Macrozonaris CAN 22 Aug 1980 1 Saskatoon 12 Jan 2002 6.26 Pierre Browne CAN 14 Jan 1980 1 r2 Gainesville, FL 10 Feb 2002 5.69 Gennadiy Chernovol KAZ 06 Jun 1976 4+ Liévin 24 Feb 2002 6.26 A Andre Ammons USA 17 Nov 1978 1 r5 Reno, NV 16 Feb 2002 5.73 Mickey Grimes USA 10 Oct 1976 1 r1 Los Angeles, CA 23 Feb 2002 6.26 Jason Green USA 27 Jul 1981
    [Show full text]
  • World Rankings — Women's Heptathlon
    World Rankings — Women’s Heptathlon © VICTOR SAILER/PHOTO RUN Carolina Klüft was No. 1 for 6 straight years, then unexpectedly became a long jumper in ’08, never tackling the multi again 6 different Pent/Hept versions 1956 1956–60: Day 1 was SP, HJ, 200 1 .........Nina Vinogradova (Soviet Union) Day 2 was 80H, LJ 2 .... Aleksandra Chudina (Soviet Union) 1961–68: Day 1 was 80H, SP, HJ 3 ................ Nilia Kulkova (Soviet Union) Day 2 was LJ, 200 4 ............Galina Bystrova (Soviet Union) 1969–76: Day 1 was 100H, SP, HJ 5 ......... Sofia Burdulenko (Soviet Union) Day 2 was LJ, 200 6 ............... Maria Sturm (West Germany) © VICTOR SAILER/PHOTO RUN 1977–80: Day 1 was 100H, SP, HJ 7 ........Klara Nikitinskaya (Soviet Union) Day 2 was LJ, 800 8 .....Galina Nozdracheva (Soviet Union) 1981–82: Day 1 was 100H, SP, HJ, 200 9 .......Yevgenia Gurevich (Soviet Union) Day 2 was LJ, JT, 800 10 .......... Galina Akimova (Soviet Union) 1983–present: Day 1 is 100H, HJ, SP, 200 Day 2 is LJ, JT, 800 © Track & Field News 2020 — 1 — World Rankings — Women’s Heptathlon 1957 1961 1 ............Galina Bystrova (Soviet Union) 1 .................... Irina Press (Soviet Union) 2 ............Lidia Shmakova (Soviet Union) 2 ............Galina Bystrova (Soviet Union) 3 ...... Edeltraud Eiberle (West Germany) 3 ... Tatyana Shchelkanova (Soviet Union) 4 .... Aleksandra Chudina (Soviet Union) 4 ............Lidia Shmakova (Soviet Union) 5 .............. Vilve Maremäe (Soviet Union) 5 ........... Maria Sizyakova (Soviet Union) 6 .......Zinaida Burenkova (Soviet Union) 6 ........ Helga Hoffmann (West Germany) 7 .........Nina Vinogradova (Soviet Union) 7 ................Olga Kardash (Soviet Union) 8 ........Christa Buchner (West Germany) 8 ...............
    [Show full text]
  • 6Wdwlvwlfv +Dqgerrn
    Statistics Handbook 14 - 17 July 2011, Ostrava www.ostrava2011.com City Stadium Ostrava-Vtkovice EUROPEAN RECORDS U23 MEN 100 m 9.97 Dwain CHAMBERS GBR 1978 22.08.1999 Sevilla 100 m 9.97 + Christophe LEMAITRE FRA 1990 29.08.2010 Rieti 200 m 20.19 Christian MALCOLM GBR 1979 27.09.2000 Sydney 400 m 44.33 Thomas SCHÖNLEBE GDR 1965 03.09.1987 Roma 800 m 1:42.47 Yuriy BORZAKOVSKIY RUS 1981 24.08.2001 Bruxelles 1000 m 2:15.45 Mehdi BAALA FRA 1978 08.07.2000 Nice 1500 m 3:30.88 Rui SILVA POR 1977 11.08.1999 Zürich 1 mile 3:50.91 Rui SILVA POR 1977 07.07.1999 Roma 3000 m 7:37.50 Morhad AMDOUNI FRA 1988 17.07.2009 Saint-Denis 5000 m 13:10.40 Hansjörg KUNZE GDR 1959 09.09.1981 Rieti 10000 m 28:18.18 Vasiliy MATVIYCHUK UKR 1982 04.07.2004 Yalta 3000 m St. 8:10.83 Günther WEIDLINGER AUT 1978 21.08.1999 Sevilla 110 m Hurd. 12.97 Ladji DOUCOURE FRA 1983 15.07.2005 Angers 400 m Hurd. 47.85 Harald SCHMID FRG 1957 04.08.1979 Torino High Jump 2.42 Patrik SJÖBERG SWE 1965 30.06.1987 Stockholm Pole Vault 6.00 Sergey BUBKA URS 1963 13.07.1985 Paris Long Jump 8.86 Robert EMMIYAN URS 1965 22.05.1987 Tsakhkadzor Triple Jump 17.98 + Teddy TAMGHO FRA 1989 12.06.2010 New York Shot Put 20.94 Edis ELKAŠEVI 5 CRO 1983 23.06.2005 Velenje Discus 68.60 Wolfgang SCHMIDT GDR 1954 21.05.1976 Köln Hammer 81.70 Olli-Pekka KARJALAINEN FIN 1980 16.07.2002 Lahti Javelin 89.58 Steve BACKLEY GBR 1969 02.07.1990 Stockholm Decathlon 8617 Andrey KRAVCHENKO BLR 1986 26.05.2007 Götzis (10.68-7.90-13.89-2.15-47.46-14.05-39.63-5.00-64.35-4:29.10) 20 km Walk 1:17:16 Vladimir KANAYKIN
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Sebrle Y Carolina Kluft, Campeones Olímpicos En Atenas, Participan En Madrid’2005
    Av. Valladolid, 81, 1º - 28008 Madrid • Tel. 91-548 24 23 Fax. 91-547 61 13 / 91- 548 06 38 E-Mail: [email protected] • Web Page: http://www.madrid2005.org • CIF: Q-2878003-I Noticias/News: 14 19/01/2005 ROMAN SEBRLE Y CAROLINA KLUFT, CAMPEONES OLÍMPICOS EN ATENAS, PARTICIPAN EN MADRID’2005 El decatleta checo Román Sebrle, y la heptatleta sueca Carolina Kluft, vigentes medallas de oro Atenas’2004 en decatlón y heptatlón respectivamente, forman parte de los 10 hombres y 10 mujeres especialistas en pruebas combinadas que participarán en los Europeos bajo techo de Madrid’2005, tras atender la invitación formulada en su día por la AEA En pista cubierta la prueba combinada de hombres es el heptatlón y la de mujeres el pentatlón. La idea es que tomen parte 15 hombres y 15 mujeres en cada prueba. La AEA invitó a participar a los nueve mejores decatletas y a las nueve mejores heptatletas del ranking 2004 al aire libre. También invita a dos representantes de España, un hombre y una mujer, que la RFEA designará en su momento. Los otros cinco hombres y cinco mujeres serán sido elegidos a la vista del ranking de heptatlón y pentatlón en pista cubierta 2005. El único condicionante es que como máximo pueden participar dos atletas del mismo país por prueba. La lista ya oficial de heptatletas y pentatletas invitados que han confirmado su participación en el Palacio de Deportes de Madrid, es la siguiente: Hombres Ranking Puntos Nombre País Confirmado Lugar Fecha 1 8893 Roman Šebrle CZE 9 Athína 24-Aug 2 8343 Chiel Warners NED 9 Athína 24-Aug 3 8317
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 World Indoor Lists N. 10 Ter Updated As at 12 May 1999
    1999 World Indoor Lists N. 10 ter updated as at 12 May 1999 Compiled by Ottavio Castellini Legenda IAAF Statistics & Documentation Manager A altitude Other compilers h heat José Luis Hernández (ESP) (sprint & hurdles, men & women) qf quarter-final (E-mail address : [email protected]) sf semi-final Carlos Fernández Canet (ESP) (800m - Marathon, men & women) f final (E-mail address : [email protected]) r race Jirí Havlín (CZE) (Field Events, men & women) c competition (E-mail address: [email protected]) q qualification = ex-aequo with the assistance of jo jump off Marco Buccellato (ITA) pen pentathlon (E-mail : [email protected]) hep heptathlon Amendments will be gratefully received by Ottavio Castellini (E-mail address : [email protected]) Tel. (+377) 93 10 88 72 Fax (+377) 93 25 09 00 Monaco, 12 May 1999 IAAF Competitions Department MEN MEN 50 METRES ( WR 5.56 Donovan BAILEY CAN Reno, 09 Feb 1996 ) 50 METRES ( WR 5.56 Donovan BAILEY CAN Reno, 09 Feb 1996 ) ( WR 5.56 Maurice GREENE USA Los Angeles, 13 Feb 1999 ) ( WR 5.56 Maurice GREENE USA Los Angeles, 13 Feb 1999 ) 5.56 Maurice GREENE USA 23 Jul 1974 1 Los Angeles 13 Feb 1999 5.86 Patrick MOCCI RAOUMBE GAB 16 Jan 1970 5+h1 Liévin 21 Feb 1999 5.59 Maurice GREENE 1+ Madrid 16 Feb 1999 ( 18 performances by 18 athletes) 5.61 Deji ALIU NGR 22 Nov 1975 1+ Liévin 21 Feb 1999 5.62 Eric NKANSAH GHA 12 Dec 1974 2+ Liévin 21 Feb 1999 5.63 Jon DRUMMOND USA 09 Sep 1968 2 Los Angeles 13 Feb 1999 55 METRES 5.63 Deji ALIU 1+h2 Liévin 21 Feb 1999 5.64 Bruny SURIN CAN 12 Jul 1967 3+ Liévin 21 Feb
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis.Pdf (12.16Mb)
    Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education Mass Protests from a Spatial Perspective Discontent and Urban Public Space in Kyiv, Minsk, and Moscow Arve Hansen A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor – November 2019 Front page: Protesters in front of Maidan, 22 January 2019 Photo: Arve Hansen Acknowledgements First of all, my deepest gratitude goes to my main supervisor, Yngvar Steinholt. You have made the process of writing both this doctoral thesis and my previous master’s thesis a thoroughly enjoyable experience, and I have learned a lot from you. I also greatly appreciate the academic and personal support of my co-supervisor, Andrei Rogatchevski. Without the two of you and your readiness to facilitate my work, it would have been absolutely impossible to realise this project. You have pushed me forward, connected me with people, and improved my writing. For this I am grateful. A big thank you goes to my colleagues in the RSCPR research group and at UiT, especially Svetlana Sokolova and Kari Aga Myklebost, who have read, commented, and followed my progress every step of the way. Thanks also to Kirsty Jane Falconer for proofreading; Ferenc Leskó and Polina Gladkaya, for your seemingly unlimited hospitality and friendship; Janet Handley (our media correspondent), for your delicious food and interesting conversations; and Andrei Krasniashchikh, for everything you have done for me and our research group. Thanks are also due to Torgeir Alvestad, Petter Bauck, Harald Hoff, and David-Emil Wickström. My project has also put me in touch with people across the world, at seminars, PhD courses and study groups at UiT, NaUKMA and UiO; as well as among the audiences for the papers I have presented in Cambridge, Chernivtsi, Kassel, Kharkiv, Kyiv, Lund, Lviv, Mannheim, Oslo, San Francisco, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Lists N.No 21, All, 2001
    2001 World Indoor Lists No 21 updated as at 13 December 2001 Compiled by Ottavio Castellini Legenda IAAF Statistics & Documentation Manager A altitude Other compiler h heat qf quarter-final Carlos Fernandez Canet (ESP) sf semi-final f final with the assistance of r race c competition Jiri Havlin (CZE) q qualification Marco Buccellato (ITA) = ex-aequo jo jump off jun junior Amendments will be gratefully received by pen pentathlon Ottavio Castellini hep heptathlon (E-mail address : [email protected]) dec decathlon Tel. (+377) 93 10 88 72 U20 Under 20 Fax (+377) 93 25 09 00 U23 Under 23 ope open Monaco, 13 December 2001 ext extra Inv Invitational Uni University Col Collegiate HS High School * = world record awaiting ratification IAAF Competitions Department MEN MEN 50 METRES ( WR 5.56 Donovan Bailey CAN Reno, 09 Feb 1996 ) 55 METRES 5.63 Freddy Mayola CUB 01 Nov 1977 1+ Madrid 14 Mar 2001 6.24 Jason Smoots USA 1 h1 Boston (Rox), MA 09 Mar 2001 5.64 Jeff Laynes USA 03 Oct 1970 1 r4 Los Angeles 20 Jan 2001 6.25 Anson Henry CAN 09 Mar 1979 2 Cheney, WA 20 Jan 2001 5.65 Deji Aliu NGR 22 Nov 1975 1+ Liévin 25 Feb 2001 6.25 Christie Van Wyk NAM 12 Oct 1977 1 h2 Boston (Rox), MA 09 Mar 2001 5.66 Gregory Saddler USA 29 Jun 1974 2+ Liévin 25 Feb 2001 ( 13 performances by 12 athletes ) 5.67 Venancio José ESP 19 Apr 1976 2+ Madrid 14 Mar 2001 Hand timing 5.69 Mickey Grimes USA 10 Oct 1976 2 r4 Los Angeles 20 Jan 2001 6.00 Gene Sun USA 1 Annapolis, MD 13 Jan 2001 5.70 Deji Aliu 1+h2 Liévin 25 Feb 2001 ( 1 performance by 1 athlete ) 5.70 Coby Miller USA
    [Show full text]