DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting Notes 2001-07-12 [Part B]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Meeting Notes 2001-07-12 [Part B] Portland State University PDXScholar Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 7-12-2001 Meeting Notes 2001-07-12 [Part B] Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation, "Meeting Notes 2001-07-12 [Part B] " (2001). Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation. 324. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact/324 This Minutes is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Priorities 2002 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program 2002-2005 Project Ranking Public Comments June 12-July 11, 2001 METRO Priorities 2002 MTBP Project Ranking Public Comment Report July 12, 2001 This report is a compilation of public comments regarding funding priorities for the fiscal years 2002 - 2005 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTCP) in summer 2001. Public input was solicited on the ranking of projects from June 12 to July 11, 2001. A public comment meeting was held at Metro on Monday, June 18 from 6 to 9 pm. Comments have been summarized from that meeting, plus written communications (mail, fax and e-mail) and the telephone hotline. Anonymous letters and comments are not included in this summary. The report is divided into the following sections: 1. Summary of Comments - This section provides a general summary of all comments, written and oral, received during the public comment period, June 12 - July 11, 2001. 2. Oral Comments - This section contains a brief synopsis of oral comments received at a public comment meeting on June 18 at Metro. All comments have been summarized to best reflect each person's sentiments. Attachments to the oral comments are included at the end of this section. 3. Written Comments - This section includes written comments received during the public comment period from June 12 to July 11, 2001. Each written response has been summarized, similar to the oral comments, and all letters/cards are included in this report. 4. Post Cards - More than 100 pre-printed post cards were received regarding support of funding of the Springwater Trail. Since the post cards all supported funding for the same project, this section lists the names and addresses only. 5. Appendix - This section includes sample copies of public notices, advertisements, press releases and other associated materials. Please note that the comments received after this document was prepared will be compiled as a separate supplement to the Public Comment Report. Table of Contents Introduction Section One Summary of Comments 3 Section Two Oral Comments Received at the Public Meeting of June 18, 2001: Meeting Report, Metro Council Annex 11 Attachments 19 Meeting Report, Metro Room 370 31 Transportation Telephone Hotline Comments 51 Section Three Written Comments ...55 E-Mail Comments 126 Section Four PostCards 137 Section Five Appendix 143 Section One Summary of Comments Priorities 2002 Summary of Public Comments June 12, 2001 Introduction This report provides a summary of public comments received to date on transportation funding priorities in the 2002-2005 Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Program (MTIP). All comments received during the public comment period, June 12 — July 11, 2001 are included. Both oral and written comments were received during a public comment meeting held on Monday, June 18 at Metro. The MTIP is a regional transportation funding program that identifies projects to be constructed or programs to be funded with federal transportation revenues over the next four years. Local jurisdictions submit transportation projects to Metro for funding consideration. Eligible projects range from freeways, roads and highways to buses, bicycle lanes, boulevards, pedestrian improvements and planning projects. For the first time, freeways improvements are in the proposed project list. A public comment packet, with project descriptions and the draft project rankings, was mailed to interested parties on request and available at the public comment meeting. The public was asked to comment on the following: 1. Of the transportation projects under consideration for funding, which do you think are most important? 2. Do you think that regional funds should begin to fund freeway improvements (work formerly paid for by the Oregon Department of Transportation)? 3. Does the recommended technical ranking seem reasonable? If not, why not? 4. Are there other project considerations that would interest decision makers?" 5. Do you have recommendations for the modal mix (freeways, roads, buses, bike lanes, sidewalks, etc.) of projects that should be included in the final package? Most comments focused on the first and last questions regarding the most important projects for funding and the modal mix desired. A public comment meeting was held at Metro on June 18, 2001. More than 50 oral comments were received by panel members consisting of Metro Councilors and JPACT members. All oral comments were summarized and may be found in Section 2. Comment cards may be found under Section 3, Written Comments. July 11, 2001 MTIP Priorities 2002 Project Ranking Public Comments Page 3 General Comments Many comments were received in favor of a balance of transportation investments, especially those that will reduce the number of cars on the road. Many of these comments requested that public transit be the top consideration, followed by bicycle and pedestrian paths. Bicycle advocates strongly requested more bike and pedestrian paths, noting that these multi-use paths would take cars off the roads during the peak commute times, as well as provide more weekend recreation. The value of bike and pedestrian improvements on non-freeway bridges was also stressed. Other general comments focused on the need for sidewalks in neighborhoods, and the need for more TDM projects in the region. Many comments related to safety of streets and crossings with the growth of traffic congestion. The TOD program in general was praised for providing public/private partnerships for successful mixed-use projects in high-density town centers. Summary of Comments Summary of all comments received A total of 460 comments, oral and written, were received on specific MTIP projects in the project ranking public process. The most support was shown for the bike projects (49 percent), road modernization (18 percent), boulevards (7.4 percent), and transit projects (6.7 percent). This represents a balance of project modes around the region, with bicycle trails (especially the Springwater Corridor) being the focus of this comment period. Fewer comments were received on pedestrian projects (5 percent), freight projects (4 percent), TDM projects (3 percent), TOD projects (2 percent), planning projects (1.5 percent) and road reconstruction (.04 percent). Project Comments by Mode Bike projects A total of 227 comments were received on all the bicycle projects, with the most received on the East Bank Trail/Spring water Trail. East Bank Trail/Springwater Trail A majority of bike comments (150) were in favor of the East Bank Trail/Springwater Trail Connector project. Of these comments, 112 were pre-printed post cards with Page 4 MTIP Priorities 2002 Project Ranking Public Comments July 11, 2001 personalized notes. It was a unified response, urging the linking of trails for bicyclists and pedestrians. Many people noted the potential to increase bicycle commuting and reduce the number of cars on the road by creating a trail to downtown Portland. The project is seen as a critical link to other regional trails, to OMSI and to the Eastbank Esplanade. Morrison Bridge Bicycle/Pedestrian Facility Many comments (38) were in favor of the multi-use pathway across the Morrison Bridge. It is considered a vital link to downtown Portland for bicyclists and pedestrians traveling to work and school, as well as for recreation. Gresham-Fairview Trail Twenty comments were received in favor of constructing this bike/ped path, to help gain more access to downtown Gresham, as well as more recreational opportunity. Fanno Creek Trail, Phase 2 Fourteen comments on the Fanno Creek Trail emphasized this trail as a critical link in the only bike path system in Washington County. Washington Street Boulevard Project PE: 12th/16th This project received four comments in favor of mixed-use bike, transit and pedestrian amenities as improving livability in Oregon City. Pedestrian Projects Twenty-seven comments were received on four pedestrian projects in the MTIP ranking process. The Jennings Avenue: 99E/Portland Ave. Ped Access Project This project received the most comments and support (11) of all pedestrian projects. Regional Pedestrian Access to Transit Program Eight comments stressed the need for more access to bus lines through more sidewalks and pedestrian amenities around the region. 257th Avenue Pedestrian Improvements Five comments were received on the need for improvements for pedestrians along this transit corridor. Molalla Ave. Boulevard Project Three comments stressed the need for boulevard status for Molalla Avenue. The other pedestrian projects received no comments. July 11, 2001 MTIP Priorities 2002 Project Ranking Public Comments Page 5 Boulevard
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Portland Pride 2008 Is Going to Bring. It. Oh Really?
    PRIDE1 This year, Pride Northwest, Inc. has made quite the promise: Portland Pride 2008 is going to Bring. It. Oh really? Well, the Mercury is going to Bring. It. On! Inside, check out our homage to the cheer-tastic lm of the same name, featuring Portland’s brightest stars of the queer cheerleading squad (and their rivals, the anti-gay troupe). We’ve also got queers who bring it with guns, a head-to-head gay-off, and a polite request that certain gays stop bringing it, please. Plus: All the info you need to enjoy Portland Pride 2008, from the parade and waterfront festival EDITED BY AMY J. RUIZ to every dance night in town. You know what to do. PRIDE2 2 Portland Mercury June 5, 2008 The Official Guide to Pride June 14-15, 2008 PRIDE3 The Official Guide to Pride June 14-15, 2008 June 5, 2008 Portland Mercury 3 PRIDE4 HP. Proud Sponsor of the Portland Pride Festival. hp.com/go/diversity 2008 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. 4 Portland Mercury June 5, 2008 The Official Guide to Pride June 14-15, 2008 PRIDE5 The BRING IT Manifesto BRO’s Next Battle… and How You Can Bring it, Too! by Basic Rights Oregon The BRING IT Manifesto Can you hear the bells ringing? No, it’s not the sound of be free to earn a living, and able to care for the ones we love. wedding bells (yet). It’s the sound of socially regressive vot- After 20 years of ballot measures designed to divide our state ers getting their wings! According to polls, bigotry is aging in two, we believe the time to BRING IT for equality is now.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro I Making a Great Place
    600 NE Grand Ave. www.oregonmetro.gov Portland, OR 97232-2736 .,Metro I Making a great place August 4, 2016 Board of County Commissioners Multnomah County cjo Land Use Planning Division 1600 SE 190th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97233 RE: METRO COMMENTS - Draft Comprehensive Plan Updates Dear Chair Kafoury and County Commissioners: · On behalf of Metro, I want to thank you for the opportunity to participate in this Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. Through this letter, I hope to share a bit more background on Metro's Parks and Nature Program; provide general comments and concerns on the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments; and propose plan language amendments for your consideration. Metro seeks edits that support Metro's role as a park service provider and to balance recreational needs and uses with natural resource protection and neighborhood concerns. I would also like to thank Planning Director Michael Cerbone and Multnomah County staff for their work on this complex project. The Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process: The County's Comprehensive Plan update process is largely a citizen-driven process, with the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) submitting its recommendations to the County Planning Commission for consideration and discussion. The Planning Commission was the first county government body to review the draft plan and thereafter provide policy guidance to the Board of County Commissioners. Before the Planning Commission, Metro presented comments and concerns, as well as proposed revisions to the County's draftcomprehensive plan language. The Planning Commission heard testimony that supported Metro's positions. The Planning Commission also heard testimony that sought to isolate the County's rural lands and residents.
    [Show full text]
  • FRG17 Online-1.Pdf
    Tualatin Dance Center - 8487 SW Warm Krayon Kids Musical Theater Co. - 817 12th, ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT Springs, Tualatin; 503-691-2414; facebook.com. Oregon City; 503-656-6099; krayonkids.org. Musical theater featuring local children. ART GALLERIES in camps and classes, plus supplies for at-home projects. Ladybug Theater - 8210 SE 13th; 502-232- & EXHIBITS DRAMA / THEATER 2346; ladybugtheater.com. Wed. morning Vine Gogh Artist Bar & Studio - 11513 SW Pa- Northwest Children’s Theater performances for young children with audience Oregon Historical Society cific Hwy, Tigard; 971-266-8983; vinegogh.com. participation. and School Visit our new permanent exhibit History Public painting classes for all ages. Hub where families can explore the topic of NWCT produces award-winning children’s Lakewood Theatre Company - 368 S State, diversity through fun, hands-on interactives. Young Art Lessons - 7441 SW Bridgeport; 503- theater productions and is one of the largest Lake Oswego; 503-635-3901; lakewood-center. With puzzles, touch screen activities, and board 336-0611; 9585 SW Washington Sq; 503-352- theater schools on the West Coast. NWCT org. Live theater and classes for kids and adults. games, History Hub asks students to consider 5965; youngartusa.co. keeps the magic of live performance accessible questions like “Who is an Oregonian?,” and and affordable to over 65,000 families annually Portland Revels - 1515 SW Morrison Street; “How can you make Oregon a great place for with a mission to educate, entertain, and enrich 503-274-4654; portlandrevels.org. Seasonal everyone?” the lives of young audiences. performances feature song, dance, story and DANCE ritual of the past and present.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Notes 1999-05-13 [Part B]
    Portland State University PDXScholar Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Oregon Sustainable Community Digital Library 5-13-1999 Meeting Notes 1999-05-13 [Part B] Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact Recommended Citation Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation, "Meeting Notes 1999-05-13 [Part B] " (1999). Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation. Paper 270. http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/oscdl_jpact/270 This Minutes is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Joint Policy Advisory Committee on Transportation by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Priorities 2000 Public Comment Letters and e-mail April 1 - May 3,1999 Alegria, Pamela 65 American Institute of Architects, Portland Chapter 39 Bicycle Transportation Alliance 36-37 Bridger, Glenn W 60 Brown, Russ 26 Ciarlo, Catherine 36-37 Clackamas County Board of Commissioners 5 Clackamas County Economic Development Commission 16 CNF Service Company 40 Columbia Slough Watershed Council 9-10 Custom Woodworking 49-54 Dawes, Rick 34 Ditmars, Lois 42 Edwards, Representative Randall 58-59 Enoch Manufacturing Company 34 Epstein, Andrew 11 Erwert, Tim 29 Fekety, Sharon 45 Follett, Matthew 28 Gailey, Allison 30 Goldfarb, Gabriela 8 Gordly, Senator Avel 57 Gresham-Barlow School District 56 Hall, Elinor 32-33 Hillsboro,
    [Show full text]
  • Combined 97 Index
    1997 ARTICLE LISTINGS BY CATEGORY Click on any category below TRAVEL Western Wanderings 12 Techniques,Maintenance 17 Shade,Sun Control 21 Accessories,Gear 1 Wildlife,Nature 12 Tools,Products 18 Storage 21 Agriculture 1 Window on the West 12 Trees 18 Tools,Products 21 Alaska 1 Wineries,Wine Regions 12 Tropicals,Subtropicals 18 Windows,Skylights 21 Arizona 1 Wyoming 12 Vegetables 18 Art,Exhibits,Museums 1 Vines 18 FOOD Beaches,Coast 2 GARDEN Water Features 18 Appetizers 22 Best of the West 2 Animals 13 Watering 18 Barbecuing 22 Biking 2 Annuals,Biennials 13 Beverages 22 Boating,River Trips,Cruises Arrangements 13 HOME Breads 22 3 Beneficial Insects 13 Architecture 19 Cakes 22 California 3 Bulbs,Bulblike Plants 13 Artisans 19 Casseroles 22 Camping 4 Cactus,Succulents 13 Bathroooms 19 Cereals,Grains 22 Canada 4 Community Action 13 Building Materials 19 Competitions 22 Colorado 4 Container Gardening 13 Design Contests,Awards Cookies,Candies 22 Environmental Action 4 Crafts,Projects 13 19 Dairy,Eggs 22 Events 5 Design Contests,Awards Doors,Entries 19 Desserts 23 Fishing 7 13 Ecology,Energy 19 Equipment 23 Hawaii 7 Events 14 Electrical,Electronic 19 Fish,Shellfish 23 Hiking,Trails 7 Fruits,Nuts 14 Entertainment Centers 20 Food Products 23 Idaho 7 Herbs 14 Fireplaces,Woodstoves 20 Fruit 23 Lodging 7 House Plants 14 Furniture 20 International 24 Mexico 8 Landscaping 14 Garages 20 Meat 24 Montana 8 Lawns,Grasses 14 Home Office 20 Menus 24 Nevada 9 Native Plants 15 Interior Design 20 Nuts 25 New Mexico 9 Nurseries,Seed Sources 15 Kitchens 20 Pasta
    [Show full text]
  • Family -Friendly Spots to Live, Play And
    Vote for your favorites! PDX Parent Picks 2021 for the long days and short years theCity Guide FamiFamilyly- friendly spotspotss to live, play and eat PDXPARENT.COM PORTLAND | VANCOUVERpdxparent.com | JANUARY | January 2021 1 pdxparent.com | January 2021 3 4 January 2021 | pdxparent.com contents ERIN J. BERNARD BONCHRON DENISE CASTAÑON NATALIE GILDERSLEEVE PORTLAND PARKS AND RECREATION PDX Parent’s City Guide Take a deep dive into family-friendly neighborhoods across the quadrants and beyond. Find family-tested places to eat and play; housing costs; transit, walk and bike scores; and much more. North: BONUS STORIES RESOURCES St. Johns neighborhood ..........................................................8 Editor’s Note ..........................................................................6 City Guide Listings Northeast: A helpful directory to find Friendly Neighborhoods King neighborhood .......................................................................12 for LGBTQ+ Families ....................................................9 everything your family needs — from dentists to dance Southeast: Supporting Local Black-owned .......................................................................10 Sellwood-Moreland neighborhood ............................16 classes. Businesses .............................................................................13 School Open Houses ............................... 31 Southwest: GreatSchools.org: .................................................20 Maplewood neighborhood Ratings Aren’t the
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT REPORT FIRST QUARTER FY 2013-14 FY 2013-14 First Quarter Management Report Table of Contents
    July to September MANAGEMENT REPORT FIRST QUARTER FY 2013-14 FY 2013-14 First quarter management report Table of contents Management report item Page Metro management report executive summary 2 Metro management report at-a-glance 3 Metro management report in detail 10 Office of the COO 1.1 Diversity Program 10 1.2 Equity Strategy Program 10 Finance and Regulatory Services 2.1 Solid waste compliance and cleanup 12 Parks and Environmental Services 3.1 Cemetery operations 14 3.2 Parks and natural areas management 15 3.3 Solid waste operations 16 Planning and Development 4.1 Land use planning 17 4.2 Project development 19 4.3 Transportation system planning 20 Sustainability Center 5.1 Natural areas 21 5.2 Parks and natural areas levy 23 5.2 Parks planning and development 29 5.3 Resource conservation and recycling 29 Visitor Venues 6.1 Convention, trade and consumer shows 31 6.2 Performing arts, arts and culture 33 6.3 Zoo conservation and research 34 6.4 Zoo education 35 6.5 Zoo infrastructure bond (A Better Zoo) 36 6.6 Zoo visitor experience 38 Metro management report for 1st quarter, FY 2013-14 Page 1 Metro Management Report At-a-Glance 1st Quarter FY 2013-14 During the first quarter, Metro improved customer service, launched parks and natural area levy implementation and continued efforts to increase revenues and reach sustainability and diversity goals. The Diversity Program focused managers on workforce diversity goals and developed materials to advance diversity in procurement. Equity Strategy Program staff moved forward with Equity Baseline work, formed an advisory committee and developed a pilot community partnership project.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Hagg Lake Environmental Assessment and FONSI
    FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT PN FONSI -04-01 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HENRY HAGG LAKE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Introduction The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has completed a mUlti-year planning and public involvement program for the purpose of preparing a Resource Management Plan (RMP) for Henry Hagg Lake and the surrounding Reclamation lands, known as Scoggins Valley Park. The RMP program is authorized under Title 28 of Public Law 102-575. Reclamation has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) of the plan in compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969. The purpose of the RMP is to manage natural and cultural resources, facilities, and access on Reclamation's lands at Henry Hagg Lake for the next 10 years. This RMP will also serve as guidance for Washington County's (WACO) management of Scoggins Valley Park, Reclamation's public entity, and non-Federal managing partner. Alternatives Considered The National Environmental Policy Act requires Reclamation to explore a reasonable range of alternative management approaches and to evaluate the environmental effects of these alternatives. Three alternatives are evaluated and compared in this document, including a No Action Alternative and a Preferred Alternative. Alternative A - No Action - Continuation of Existing Management Practices. Management would be conducted according to the priorities and projects proposed under the preferred alternative in the 1994 EA for Scoggins Valley Park/Henry Hagg Lake Recreation Development, including camping. Reclamation would continue to adhere to all applicable Federal and State laws, regulations, and executive orders, including those enacted since the 1994 EA was adopted. Alternative B - Minimal Recreation Development with Resource Enhancement_ Alternative B accommodates the increasing demands for recreation at Henry Hagg Lake primarily by expanding and upgrading existing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Transportation Growth Management Grant Application Instructions
    2020 Transportation Growth Management Grant Application Instructions Be sure to download and review the 2020 application packet before filling out this grant application. The application packet, additional resources, and examples of successful applications can be found on the TGM planning grants page. You can save your progress and revisit this form at any time by clicking the "Save" button at the bottom of each page. Applications must be received by July 31, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. (PDT) Applicant information Instructions: Complete this information for the applicant. Provide both a designated contact and an authorized representative (if different than the designated contact) for your entity. The authorized representative is someone who is authorized to make decisions and sign a funding agreement with ODOT should your project be chosen for funding. Primary applicant jurisdiction City of Fairview Mailing address 1300 NE Village Street, Fairview, Oregon 97024 Website http://www.fairvieworegon.gov Contact person name Sarah Selden Contact person title Senior Planner & Economic Development Coordinator Contact phone Contact email (503) 674-6242 [email protected] Would you like to receive TGM news and updates? Yes Authorized representative name, if different from the applicant contact Nolan Young Authorized representative title City Administrator Phone Email (503) 674-6221 [email protected] List other participating local jurisdictions (if any) List other participating local jurisdictions (if any) Participating local jurisdiction Providing match? City of Troutdale Yes City of Wood Village Yes Multnomah County No Project name and location Project title Main Streets on Halsey Cross Section and Street Design Plan Project area: Using either of the two fields below, attach a map of the project area or describe the area your project is located in.
    [Show full text]
  • Trust Government? Fuhgeddaboudit
    Halloween happenings There’s plenty to do in Portland area — SEE LIFE, B1 PortlandTHURSDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2014 • TWICE CHOSEN THE NATION’S BEST NONDAILY PAPERTribune • PORTLANDTRIBUNE.COM • PUBLISHED TUESDAY AND THURSDAY Trust government? Fuhgeddaboudit dents, but there is no majority the Oregon Legislature. In the But 67 percent also said candi- were more dissatisfied than New poll reveals most voters are from any group on the other side. DHM survey conducted recently, dates for governor, and 68 per- Democrats. Yet by an almost identical ma- only 27 percent saw their city cent said candidates for U.S. sen- In the race for senator, dissatis- dissatisfi ed as crucial election nears jority of 58 percent, Oregonians government favorably, and 28 ator, were not addressing the is- faction came most from outside also say they do not trust their percent had similar feelings for sues they thought the election the Willamette Valley and the By PETER W ONG of fi cials N ov. 4 . state and local governments to their county government. should focus on — even though Portland area. While a majority The Tribune By a substantial majority of 59 spend their money wisely. According to other recent sur- there was no consensus on what of 61 percent felt no change from percent, they say Oregon’s sys- In a different DHM Research veys by DHM Research, 51 per- those issues are. previous elections, 24 percent Oregonians, like other tem of government may have its survey conducted last month for cent of voters sampled felt Ore- Men were more dissatisfied said they had more enthusiasm A mericans, do not trust problems but is sound.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan for Blue Lake, Fairview, Oregon
    Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan for Blue Lake, Fairview, Oregon Prepared for: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Metro Regional Authority, and Interlachen Homeowners Association Prepared by: Mary Pfauth and Mark Sytsma Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Environmental Sciences and Resources Portland State University May 2004 v 5.31.04 PSU Center for Lakes & Reservoirs Blue Lake IAVMP Executive Summary Blue Lake, located in Fairview, is on the1998 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) 303(d) list of water quality impaired water bodies for violating the upper pH standard (8.5) and supporting abundant aquatic weeds and algae. The lake is eutrophic and has high algal productivity, especially in mid to late summer. Curlyleaf pondweed (Potamogeton crispus), a non-native, invasive, aquatic plant species, restricts access to and use of Blue Lake by humans. Human uses of the lake which have been impaired include boating, water skiing, fishing, and swimming. Development of the current Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan was driven by the need for an integrated, adaptive management strategy which would address not only the control and prevention of invasive, nuisance plants but also their interaction with algal productivity and water quality, especially pH. The overarching goal of the Blue Lake Integrated Aquatic Vegetation Management Plan is to control nuisance aquatic vegetation so that: • human recreational and aesthetic use of the lake is facilitated, • acceptable water quality conditions are maintained, • and natural functioning of lake aquatic systems is not impaired. These goals can best be met by preventing new weed introductions and a combination of small-scale physical and mechanical methods and larger-scale chemical treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Nichaqwli Dedication.Indd
    NICHÁQWLI EVENTS, SATURDAY, AUGUST 6, 2005 Dedicate a permanent monument to the Sing happy birthday to Pomp, Sacagawea’s baby people who lived in the Blue Lake area for who camped his way across the country with Lewis centuries before Lewis and Clark and whose lives and Clark. His first birthday was at Fort Clatsop 200 were changed forever after first European contact. (at years ago. the Nicháqwli Monument site, 1:30 to 2 p.m.) Watch Alex Garibay, a world-class break- Taste salmon cooked traditionally around a fire dancer from Los Angeles, portray boatman François tended by descendants of Oregon tribes who live in Rivet, who danced on his hands to fiddle music while Multnomah County today. Indian tacos, frybread and the Expedition wintered at Fort Mandan. Rivet is other foods will be available for sale, 2 to 7 p.m. buried in St. Paul, Oregon. Listen to Eagle Beak Singers, and watch exhibition Be the first to own the newest nickels just dancers who pass on the songs and dances to new released nationwide and first available to the Portland generations. Singing and dancing remain important public at Blue Lake Regional Park from 1 to 4 p.m., community events. West Coast Bank will exchange rolls of the new “Ocean in View” nickels for cash. This nickel will Witness tribal members weaving traditional be officially released at the new Lewis and Clark baskets. Materials such as cedar, juncus, tule and Interpretive Center in Ilwaco, Washington August 5. cattails are all materials found in the area and remain an integral part of native life today.
    [Show full text]