DOCSLIB.ORG

Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance Independent Medical Education/Global Medical Grants Request for Educational Support (RFE)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance Independent Medical Education/Global Medical Grants Request for Educational Support (RFE) Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance Independent Medical Education/Global Medical Grants Request for Educational Support (RFE) Date September 4, 2019 RFE Requestor Information Name: Sylvia Nashed, PharmD, RPh Title: IME Specialist Phone: 609-302-3320 E-mail: [email protected] RFE Code RFE-19-CV-104 Therapeutic Area Cardiovascular Area of Interest Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Cancer It is our intent to support educational initiatives that focus on educating practitioners on optimal management of patients with VTE who also have cancer (treatment and reduction in risk of recurrence following initial treatment). This grant will be awarded for creation of VTE in Cancer learnings and tools to be used as part of a comprehensive initiative to address the educational gaps among HCPs in providing care to VTE patients with cancer. The successful proposal will have: Clear and concise statement of the goal, learning objectives, and expected outcomes of the educational initiative Learning plan that incorporates innovative techniques designed to engage learners, promotes application of education into practice, and incorporates the patient voice into educational resources Tools that provide HCP learners the opportunity to facilitate change to improve patient outcomes Measurement of outcomes, inclusive of learner progression throughout the activity, extent to which the activity closed the identified practice gaps, and patient impact Educational Design Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance is interested in supporting a comprehensive educational initiative that is innovative, engaging, interactive, and that leverages current scientific evidence to improve HCP knowledge, skills, competence, and ultimately patient care. The activity(ies) should measure improvement of learners’ knowledge, confidence, competence, and performance and should achieve at least a Moore’s Level 4 impact. Activities that achieve Moore’s Levels 5 and 6 outcomes are highly favored and recommended when possible. Intended Audience (may include, Heme-Oncs, Medical Oncologists, and/or multidisciplinary healthcare but not limited to) professionals involved in the care of patients with cancer. Budget/Budget Range The maximum amount of funding available for this RFE is $250,000. Funding available may support a single, comprehensive initiative or multiple grants. Single or multi-supported initiatives will be considered. Accreditation ACCME, ANCC, ACPE, and others as appropriate Geographic Coverage United States, Canada Deadline for Submission October 2, 2019 by 5 PM EST Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a consequence of clot formation in the blood circulation. It can present as either a deep vein thrombosis (DVT), a blood clot that forms predominantly in deep venous valve pockets, or a pulmonary embolism (PE), a clot that breaks and travels through blood vessels to the lungs.1 The incidence of symptomatic VTE occurrence is estimated at about 1.32 per 1,000 patients.2 VTE is often associated with identifiable risk factors that can be divided up into 3 categories according to Virchow’s triad: blood stasis, vascular injury, and hypercoagulability.3 These types of risk factors are common within the cancer patient population and there is a well-established association between both disease states.4 In addition, VTE is the second most common cause of death among cancer patients with a risk of 24.6 events per 1,000 per year as compared to the previous 1.32 per 1,000 for patients without cancer who have VTE.2,5,6 Patients with active cancer are at a 2- to 9-fold increased risk of recurrence of VTE with a poor prognosis.7,8 VTE is observed more in prostate, breast, and colon cancer.9 However, this is a result of higher prevalence of these cancer types, despite having a lower thrombotic risk.9 Specific types of cancers, including pancreatic, stomach, and metastatic, place patients at very high risk for thromboembolic events.9 The correlation between specific cancer gene mutations which includes JAK2 mutation by integration activation can lead to development of VTE.10 VTE risk can also be dependent on cancer specific therapies. Examples of cancer therapies associated with VTE risk include platinum-based therapy, hormonal therapy, Anti-VEGF therapy, BCR-ABL TKI, immunomodulatory agents, and protease inhibitors.11 Surgery can increase postoperative VTE risk and related death in cancer by 2-fold and increases PE risk, specifically, by 4-fold.12 Several guidelines on the management of cancer associated VTE, such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostatis (ISTH), and the American Society of Hematology (ASH) have been or will soon be updated. Given this, as well as the increased VTE mortality rate among cancer patients, there is a need to educate healthcare providers on appropriate treatment to optimize therapeutic outcomes.12-15 Specifically, educating hem-oncologists and medical oncologists, who are at the forefront of treating cancer patients, on VTE risk stratification and management, including understanding and application of clinical trial data and ongoing updates to evidence-based guidelines in treatment and reduction of risk of recurrence following initial treatment within this population, is important in impacting patient care and outcomes. Educational Needs and Professional Practice Gaps: BMS and Pfizer Alliance has identified, through insights from educational needs assessments, literature search, learning outcomes, and other methods, the need to address the following existing professional practice gaps by providing education on appropriate management of VTE in cancer patients (prophylaxis and treatment): Need to recognize the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality rates associated with VTE in cancer Need to recognize risk factors for cancer-related VTE and apply risk-stratification assessments to help determine optimal management of patients with cancer associated VTE Need to understand efficacy and safety profiles for currently available anti-thrombotic treatment options Need to understand and apply current, evidence-based guidelines on managing VTE in cancer, as they evolve and new data becomes available Need to treat, follow-up, and/or refer patients who are diagnosed with VTE in cancer as appropriate Need to enhance networking and collaborations across the multidisciplinary healthcare team to improve patient care, and educate patients on the importance of treatment adherence This activity(ies) will ensure timely and effective communication of the latest science, clinical trial data, and evidence-based guidelines for the management of VTE in patients with cancer. Key clinical data, barriers to care, and practice gaps will be addressed through the educational program. Specific Area of Interest BMS and the Pfizer Alliance is seeking grant applications for development and implementation of a well- designed, innovative, interactive, and educational initiative that addresses the above educational needs and professional practice gaps. Based on a series of systematic reviews conducted by Dr. Cervero to assess the impact of CME, activities that are more interactive, apply multiple methods and multiple exposures, and are focused on outcomes that are considered important by physicians, lead to more 16 positive outcomes.P Proposals that incorporate such findings into the design and development of the educational activity will be given higher priority. Further, proposals that incorporate patient education resources and tools will be prioritized. The content and/or the format of the CME/CE activity and its related materials must be current and designed in such a way that it addresses the educational needs of the intended audiences as described in this RFE. Grant Proposals should include, but not be limited to, the following information: Executive Summary: The Executive Summary should consist of 1-2 pages and highlight the key areas as described below. Needs Assessment/Gaps/Barriers: Needs assessment should be referenced and demonstrate an understanding of the specific gaps and barriers of the target audiences. The needs assessment must be independently developed and validated by the educational provider through triangulation. Target Audience and Audience Generation: Target audience for educational program must be identified within the proposal. In addition, please describe methods for reaching target audience(s) and any unique recruitment methods that will be utilized. The anticipated or estimated participant reach should also be included, with a breakdown for each modality included in the proposal, as applicable (e.g., number of participants for the live activity, the live webcast, and enduring activity). Learning Objectives: The learning objectives must be written in terms of what the learner will achieve as a result of attending. The objectives must be clearly defined, measurable, attainable, and address the identified gaps and barriers. Program Evaluation and Outcomes Reporting: Description of the approach to evaluate the quality of the educational program. Describe methods used for determining the impact of the educational program on closing identified healthcare gaps. o Please refer to “Guidance for Outcomes Report” (on the BMS grants website) for a detailed explanation of preferred outcomes reporting methods and timelines. o Remember that knowledge, performance and competency based outcome measures according to Moore’s Levels
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Print Layout 1
    TECHNICAL PROGRAM Monday, March 19 5:00 – 8:00 pm Welcome Reception Tuesday, March 20 8:00 – 10:00 Session 1: Setting the Conference Context and Drivers Chair: Geoff Slaff (Amgen) Roger Perlmutter (Amgen) Conquering the Innovation Deficit in Drug Discovery Helen Winkle (CDER, FDA) Regulatory Modernization 10:00 – 10:30 Break Vendor and poster review 10:30 – 12:30 Session 2: Rapid Cell Line Development and Improved Expression System Development Chairs: Timothy Charlebois (Wyeth) and John Joly (Genentech) Amy Shen (Genentech) Stable Antibody Production Cell-Line Development with an Improved Selection Process and Accelerated Timeline Mark Leonard (Wyeth) High-Performing Cell-Line Development within a Rapid and Integrated Platform Process Control Pranhitha Reddy (Amgen) Applying Quality-by-Design to Cell Line Development Lin Zhang (Pfizer) Development of a Fully-Integrated Automated System for High-Throughput Screening and Selection of Single Cells Expressing Monoclonal Antibodies 12:30 – 2:00 Lunch Vendor and poster review 2:00 – 4:30 Session 3: High-Throughput Bulk Process Development Chairs: Brian Kelley (Wyeth) and Jorg Thommes (Biogen Idec) Colette Ranucci (Merck) Development of a Multi-Well Plate System for High-Throughput Process Development Min Zhang (SAFC Biosciences) CHO Media Library – an Efficient Platform for Rapid Development and Optimization of Cell Culture Media Supporting High Production of Pharmaceutical Proteins in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Nigel Titchener-Hooker The Use of Ultra-Scale-Down Approaches to Enable Rapid Investigation
    [Show full text]
  • Pfizer and Mylan Will Own 57% and 43% of the New Company (“Newco”), Respectively
    DEAL PROFILE PFIZER | MYLAN VALUES 57% 43% $12.0bn PFIZER SHARE OF NEWCO MYLAN SHARE OF NEWCO NEW DEBT RAISED Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) is a pharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures, and sells products in internal medicine, vaccines, oncology, inflammation & immunology, and rare diseases. Upjohn, a subsidiary of Pfizer, is composed of Pfizer’s oral solid generics and off-patent drugs franchise, such as Viagra, Lipitor, and Xanax. Upjohn has a strong focus in emerging markets, and is headquartered in Shanghai, China. TEV: $265.4bn LTM EBITDA: $22.5bn LTM Revenue: $55.7bn Mylan N.V. (NASDAQ:MYL) Mylan N.V. (“Mylan”) is a pharmaceutical company that develops, manufactures, and commercializes generic, branded-generic, brand-name, and over-the-counter products. The company focuses in the following therapeutic areas: cardiovascular, CNS and anesthesia, dermatology, diabetes and metabolism, gastroenterology, immunology, infectious disease, oncology, respiratory and allergy, and women’s health. Mylan was founded in 1961 and is headquartered in Canonsburg, PA. TEV: $23.9bn LTM EBITDA: $3.5bn LTM Revenue: $11.3bn Bourne Partners provides strategic and financial advisory services to BOURNE clients throughout the business evolution life cycle. In order to provide PARTNERS the highest level of service, we routinely analyze relevant industry MARKET trends and transactions. These materials are available to our clients and partners and provide detailed insight into the pharma, pharma services, RESEARCH OTC, consumer health, and biotechnology sectors. On July 29, 2019, Pfizer announced the spin-off of its off-patent drug unit, Upjohn, in order to merge the unit with generic drug manufacturer, Mylan.
    [Show full text]
  • Faculty Disclosure
    Faculty Disclosure In accordance with the ACCME Standards for Commercial Support, course directors, planning committees, faculty and all others in control of the educational content of the CME activity must disclose all relevant financial relationships with any commercial interest that they or their spouse/partner may have had within the past 12 months. If an individual refuses to disclose relevant financial relationships, they will be disqualified from being a part of the planning and implementation of this CME activity. Owners and/or employees of a commercial interest with business lines or products relating to the content of the CME activity will not be permitted to participate in the planning or execution of any accredited activity. Nature of Relevant Financial Relationship Last Name Commercial Interest What Was Received For What Role AbbVie, Allergan/ Tobira Therapeutics Inc, Gilead Research Grant Research Balart Sciences Inc, Pfizer, Salix Pharmaceuticals AbbVie, Merck Honorarium Advisory Board Bau None N/A N/A Benz None N/A N/A AbbVie, Arbutus Biopharma, Dieterich Gilead Sciences, Inc., Bristol- Research Grant Consultant Myers Squibb, Merck Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences Honorarium Speaking, Consultant Inc. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Speaking, Advisory Sciences, Inc, Salix Honorarium Frenette Board Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Merck Intercept Pharmaceuticals Honorarium Advisor Conatus Pharmaceuticals Inc Honorarium Consulting Principle Investigator, Research Grant, Han Gilead Sciences,
    [Show full text]
  • Eople on the Move Eople on the Move
    eopleeople onon PPthethe movemove Pierre Cloutier Sylvie Denis Gilles Fortin Nicolas Gauvin Bernard Michaud Anna Kratochvil Abbott Abbott Abbott Abbott Abbott Abbott Laboratories Laboratories Laboratories Laboratories Laboratories Laboratories Gary Schmid Alison Shore Eric Bergey Kal Dreisziger Lidia Krupka Abbott Abbott L’Académie- Allard-Johnson Allard-Johnson Laboratories Laboratories Ogilvy Communications Communications (Montreal) (Montreal) Pierre Cloutier, formerly Business Nicolas Gauvin, formerly Senior Alison Shore, formerly Product Unit Manager, Oncology, Product Manager, GI, has been Manager, has been promoted to Pharmaceutical Products Division, promoted to Marketing Manager, GI, Senior Product Manager, Metabolic has been promoted to Director, Pharmaceutical Products Division, at (Meridia), Pharmaceutical Products Customer Relations (Corporate), at Abbott Laboratories. Division, at Abbott Laboratories. Abbott Laboratories. Bernard Michaud, formerly Senior Eric Bergey, formerly International Sylvie Denis, formerly Business Unit Product Manager, Anti-infectives, has OTC Product Manager at World Manager, Cardiovascular & been promoted to Marketing Headquarters of Pharmacia & Metabolic, has been promoted to Manager, Anti-infectives, Upjohn in Sweden and, most Director of Sales, Primary Care, Pharmaceutical Products Division, at recently, Account Supervisor at Jeffrey Pharmaceutical Products Division, at Abbott Laboratories. Simbrow Associates (Montreal), has Abbott Laboratories. been appointed Account Director at Anna Kratochvil,
    [Show full text]
  • Ipo Virtual Annual Meeting Sept
    PATENTS | TRADEMARKS | COPYRIGHTS TRADE SECRETS | INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS IPO VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING SEPT. 21-24, 2020 IPO.ORG/AM2020 KEYNOTE SPEAKERS 30+ EDUCATION POPPY CRUM SESSIONS PhD, Chief Scientist, Dolby Laboratories ANTÓNIO CAMPINOS President, European Patent Office IP EXPO #IPOAM20 ANDREI IANCU Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director United States Patent and Trademark Office KASUTANI NETWORKING TOSHIHIDE Commissioner, Japan Patent Office CONNECT ENGAGE LEARN IPO VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING | SEPT. 21-24, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNUAL MEETING STANDING IP COMMITTEES 4 COMMITTEE BUSINESS MEETINGS 5 PROGRAM AT-A-GLANCE 6 GENERAL SESSIONS 8 WORKSHOPS 11 PATENT SESSIONS 12 TRADEMARK/COPYRIGHT SESSIONS 17 INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS SESSIONS 20 OPERATIONS SESSIONS 21 SPONSORS 22 VIRTUAL IP EXPO 23 NETWORKING 24 REGISTRATION AND MEETING POLICIES 27 REGISTRATION FORM 28 IPO VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING | SEPT. 21-24, 2020 ANNUAL MEETING We are looking forward to bringing our members together in a new and innovative way this year for the 2020 Virtual Annual PROGRAM COMMITTEE Meeting on a secure and engaging virtual platform. The IPO Annual Meeting offers a mix of educational programs LEADERSHIP: featuring leaders in the IP industry, committee meetings, networking opportunities, exhibits, and more. This must-attend CHAIR: event brings together IP professionals from around the world Steve Caltrider, Eli Lilly and Co. to discuss strategies, trends, and best practices. More than VICE CHAIR FOR PATENTS: 30 education sessions will be offered on patents, trademarks, Scott Barker, Micron Technology, Inc. copyrights, industrial designs, and – new this year – operations. In addition to the sessions planned by IPO’s Program VICE CHAIR FOR TRADEMARKS: Committee, several sessions are being organized by IPO’s Colette Durst, 3M Innovative Properties Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Statements Contained in This Release As the Result of New Information Or Future Events Or Developments
    Pfizer and BioNTech Provide Update on Booster Program in Light of the Delta-Variant NEW YORK and MAINZ, GERMANY, July 8, 2021 — As part of Pfizer’s and BioNTech’s continued efforts to stay ahead of the virus causing COVID-19 and circulating mutations, the companies are providing an update on their comprehensive booster strategy. Pfizer and BioNTech have seen encouraging data in the ongoing booster trial of a third dose of the current BNT162b2 vaccine. Initial data from the study demonstrate that a booster dose given 6 months after the second dose has a consistent tolerability profile while eliciting high neutralization titers against the wild type and the Beta variant, which are 5 to 10 times higher than after two primary doses. The companies expect to publish more definitive data soon as well as in a peer-reviewed journal and plan to submit the data to the FDA, EMA and other regulatory authorities in the coming weeks. In addition, data from a recent Nature paper demonstrate that immune sera obtained shortly after dose 2 of the primary two dose series of BNT162b2 have strong neutralization titers against the Delta variant (B.1.617.2 lineage) in laboratory tests. The companies anticipate that a third dose will boost those antibody titers even higher, similar to how the third dose performs for the Beta variant (B.1.351). Pfizer and BioNTech are conducting preclinical and clinical tests to confirm this hypothesis. While Pfizer and BioNTech believe a third dose of BNT162b2 has the potential to preserve the highest levels of protective efficacy against all currently known variants including Delta, the companies are remaining vigilant and are developing an updated version of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that targets the full spike protein of the Delta variant.
    [Show full text]
  • Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer Inc., Analysis of Agreement Containing
    ANALYSIS OF AGREEMENT CONTAINING CONSENT ORDERS TO AID PUBLIC COMMENT In the Matter of Johnson & Johnson and Pfizer Inc. File No. 061-0220, Docket No. C-4180 I. Introduction The Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”) has accepted, subject to final approval, an Agreement Containing Consent Orders (“Consent Agreement”) from Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) and Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”), which is designed to remedy the anticompetitive effects that would otherwise result from J&J’s proposed acquisition of Pfizer Consumer Healthcare. Under the terms of the proposed Consent Agreement, the parties will be required to divest: (1) Pfizer’s Zantac® H-2 blocker business; (2) Pfizer’s Cortizone® hydrocortisone anti-itch business; (3) Pfizer’s Unisom® nighttime sleep-aid business; and (4) J&J’s Balmex® diaper rash treatment business. The proposed Consent Agreement has been placed on the public record for thirty (30) days for receipt of comments by interested persons. Comments received during this period will become part of the public record. After thirty (30) days, the Commission will again review the proposed Consent Agreement and will decide whether it should withdraw from the proposed Consent Agreement, modify it, or make final the Decision and Order (“Order”). Pursuant to a Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 25, 2006, J&J proposes to acquire certain voting securities and assets comprising Pfizer’s Consumer Healthcare business in a transaction valued at approximately $16.6 billion (“Proposed Acquisition”). The Commission’s complaint alleges that the Proposed Acquisition, if consummated, would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Our 2019 Peer Groups – Competitive Pay Positioning
    94228_04_Pfizer_Exec_Comp_Part 1.qxp_04 3/5/20 6:48 PM Page 72 ExEcutivE compEnsation SECTION 2 – HOW WE DETERMINE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION This chart explains the Compensation Committee’s process for determining our executive pay targets. Analysis/Tools How We Use This Information Purpose Peer and • We target the median compensation values of our peer and comparator groups to help determine Establishes a competitive pay Comparator Group an appropriate total level and pay mix for our executives. framework using comparator Pay Analysis groups’ median compensation • Each compensation target is assigned a numbered salary grade to simplify our compensation values, to help determine an Data source: publicly administration process. optimum pay mix of base pay, available financial – Each salary grade has a range of salary levels: including minimum, midpoint and maximum. annual short-term and long- and compensation term incentive targets information as – minimum and maximum salary range levels for each grade are set 25% below and above the reported by our salary range midpoint to approximate the bottom and top pay quartiles for positions assigned pharmaceutical peer to that grade. and General industry comparator Groups • We review this framework/salary grade as a guide to determine the preliminary salary recommendation, target annual short-term incentive award opportunity, and target annual long-term (typically from incentive value for each executive position. surveys and public filings) note: the actual total compensation and/or amount of each compensation element for an individual executive may be more or less than this median. Tally Sheets • We review a “tally sheet” for each ELt member that includes target and actual total compensation provides additional elements, stock ownership as well as benefits information, accumulated deferred compensation, information that assists the Data source: and outstanding equity award values.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Myers
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1306 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 10-CV-0805, Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke. ______________________ Decided: June 12, 2014 ______________________ WILLIAM F. LEE, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff- appellant. With him on the brief were LAUREN B. FLETCHER and ANDREW J. DANFORD; AMY K. WIGMORE and THOMAS G. SAUNDERS, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were PAUL BERGHOFF, ALISON J. BALDWIN, and JOSHUA R. RICH, McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, of Chicago, Illinois. GEORGE C. LOMBARDI, Winston & Strawn LLP, of Chi- cago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were LYNN MACDONALD ULRICH, IVAN M. 2 BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. POULLAOS, JULIA MANO JOHNSON, and WILLIAM P. FERRANTI. ______________________ ∗ Before PROST, Chief Judge, PLAGER and CHEN, Circuit Judges. CHEN, Circuit Judge. This patent infringement case concerns a drug for the treatment of hepatitis B. After a four-day bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware found claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 5,206,244 (’244 patent) invalid as obvious. We affirm the district court’s invalidi- ty judgment for the reasons that follow. I. Appellant Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMS) owns the ’244 patent. Claim 8 of the ’244 patent is directed to a nucleoside analog composed of two regions: a carbocyclic ring and a guanine base.
    [Show full text]
  • (“Viatris”) to the Shareholders of Pfizer Inc
    NOTIFICATION TO CANADIAN SHAREHOLDERS With respect to the distribution of the shares of Viatris Inc. (“Viatris”) to the shareholders of Pfizer Inc. (“Pfizer”) (the “Distribution”) on November 16, 2020 (the “Distribution Date”), Pfizer filed with the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”), within the prescribed time, the information that will allow the CRA to determine whether the Distribution qualifies as an “eligible distribution” for the purposes of section 86.1 of the Income Tax Act (Canada). Provided that the CRA determines that the Distribution qualifies as an eligible distribution, a Canadian resident Pfizer shareholder as of the date of the Distribution who acquires Viatris shares pursuant to the Distribution must elect in writing (filed with the taxpayer's return of income for the year in which the Distribution occurs) to have section 86.1 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) apply to the Distribution, such that the Distribution will not be viewed as a taxable foreign dividend and should not be included in such shareholder’s income. A shareholder who makes such an election will be required to allocate the aggregate cost basis amount of such shareholder’s Pfizer shares held immediately before the Distribution among the Viatris shares received in the Distribution and the Pfizer shares (in respect of which such Viatris shares were received) in proportion to their relative fair market values immediately after the Distribution. Fair market value is not defined for these purposes and shareholders should consult a Canadian tax advisor. One method to determine the fair market value is to use the closing prices of the Pfizer and Viatris common stock on the Distribution Date.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Delaware
    Case 1:20-cv-00561-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 27 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AMGEN INC. and AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, C.A. No. ________ Plaintiffs, v. HOSPIRA, INC. and PFIZER INC., DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Amgen Inc. and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, for their Complaint against Defendants Hospira, Inc. and Pfizer Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) hereby allege as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Amgen Inc. is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, California, 91320. Amgen Inc. discovers, develops, manufactures, and sells innovative therapeutic products based on advances in molecular biology, recombinant DNA technology, and chemistry. Founded in 1980, Amgen Inc. is a pioneer in the development of biological human therapeutics. Today, Amgen Inc. is one of the largest biotechnology companies in the world, fueled in part by the success of NEUPOGEN® (filgrastim). 2. Amgen Manufacturing, Limited (“AML”) is a corporation existing under the laws of Bermuda with its principal place of business in Juncos, Puerto Rico. AML manufactures and sells biologic medicines for treating particular diseases in humans. AML is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amgen Inc. Case 1:20-cv-00561-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 27 PageID #: 2 3. On information and belief, Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”) is a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its principal place of business at 275 North Field Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045.
    [Show full text]
  • Investor Presentation March 19, 2019
    Transaction Update INVESTOR PRESENTATION MARCH 19, 2019 1 Important Information For Investors And Stockholders This communication does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or a solicitation of any vote or approval. It does not constitute a prospectus or prospectus equivalent document. No offering of securities shall be made except by means of a prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. In connection with the proposed transaction between Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“Bristol-Myers Squibb”) and Celgene Corporation (“Celgene”), on February 1, 2019, Bristol-Myers Squibb filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a registration statement on Form S-4, as amended on February 1, 2019 and February 20, 2019, containing a joint proxy statement of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene that also constitutes a prospectus of Bristol- Myers Squibb. The registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on February 22, 2019, and Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene commenced mailing the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus to stockholders of Bristol-Myers Squibb and Celgene on or about February 22, 2019. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS OF BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB AND CELGENE ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FILED OR THAT WILL BE FILED WITH THE SEC CAREFULLY AND IN THEIR ENTIRETY BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN OR WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Investors and security holders will be able to obtain free copies of the registration statement and the definitive joint proxy statement/prospectus and other documents filed with the SEC by Bristol-Myers Squibb or Celgene through the website maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.
    [Show full text]