“Design, Fabrication and Control of an Articulated Robotic Arm”

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Design, Fabrication and Control of an Articulated Robotic Arm” A Project Report on “Design, Fabrication and Control of an Articulated Robotic Arm” Submitted In partial fulfillment of the requirements of degree of Bachelor of Technology- Mechanical Engineering By Sahil R. Makwana BTM862 Divya H. Shah BTM868 Kahaan P. Shah BTM 869 Under the guidance of Dr. Rajesh Buktar Department of Mechanical Engineering (SESSION: 2014-2015) Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan’s Sardar Patel College of Engineering (An Autonomous Institute affiliated to University of Mumbai) Munshi Nagar, Andheri (West), Mumbai-400058. i CERTIFICATE This is to certify that this project report entitled ‘DESIGN, FABRICATION AND CONTROL OF AN ARTICULATED ROBOTIC ARM’ is the bona-fide work of MR. SAHIL MAKWANA, MR. DIVYA SHAH and MR. KAHAAN SHAH, the students of BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, BATCH OF 2015 at SARDAR PATEL COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, who carried out the project work under my supervision and have completed it to my satisfaction. Dr. Rajesh Buktar Dr. P. H. Sawant Project Guide Principal HOD- Mechanical, S.P.C.E. S.P.C.E. ii CERTIFICATE This is to certify that this project report entitled ‘DESIGN, FABRICATION AND CONTROL OF AN ARTICULATED ROBOTIC ARM’ submitted by MR. SAHIL MAKWANA, MR. DIVYA SHAH and MR. KAHAAN SHAH, is found to be satisfactory and approved for the degree of BACHELOR OF TECHNOLOGY- MECHANICAL ENGINEERING. Dr. Rajesh Buktar Dr. Santosh Rane Prof. Sachin Vankar Project Guide Examiner Examiner HOD- Mechanical Associate Professor Assistant Professor iii DECLARATION OF THE STUDENT I declare that this written submission represents my ideas in my own words and where others' ideas or words have been included, I have adequately cited and referenced the original sources. I also declare that I have adhered to all principles of academic honesty and integrity and have not misrepresented or fabricated or falsified any idea / data / fact / source in my submission. I understand that any violation of the above will be cause for disciplinary action by the Institute and can also evoke penal action from the sources which have thus not been properly cited or from whom proper permission has not been taken when needed. Sahil Makwana Divya Shah Kahaan Shah Seat No.: BTM 862 Seat No.: BTM 868 Seat No.: BTM 869 Date: May 12, 2015. Date: May 12, 2015. Date: May 12, 2015. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The success and final outcome of this project would not have been possible without the able guidance and help from many people and we are extremely fortunate to have got this throughout the completion of the project work. We hereby take this opportunity to thank and show our gratitude towards everyone who supported us. We thank our professor, project guide and the Head of Department- Mechanical Engineering, Dr. Rajesh Buktar for guiding us throughout the way and for advising us on various aspects of our project. We thank him for offering much- appreciated and sought-after advice and suggesting thought-provoking ideas throughout the semester. We are indebted to our guide for offering us the freedom to explore and work on challenging aspects of the project. His constant support and guidance has helped us complete our project successfully. We also thank him for supporting us by providing great learning oriented infrastructure coupled with laboratory equipment and plethora of varied literature of scholarly levels incorporated in the Institute’s library which made our search and quest for research materials a lot easier. We would also like to express our sincere thanks to all our professors, colleagues and friends from different fields whose periodic inputs, informal discussions and varied perspectives have given us a better understanding of our progress. v ABSTRACT The report documents the conceptualization, design, fabrication and control of a six degree of freedom articulated robotic arm by means of design and analysis followed by manufacturing specific to a particular work envelope and payload. The motivation for this project is creating a generalized robotic arm for educational purposes at the Institute which will contribute to acquiring a deeper understanding of theories of robotic arms and at the same time enable research in various applications of robotic manipulators. The designs implemented through CATIA v5 computer software followed by payload calculations and analysis for materials and stresses have been presented as a part of this project. Manufacturing was implemented by importing designs via the drawing exchange format onto laser-cutting machines. Programming was implemented through Arduino MEGA microcontroller using C++ language. The final prototype will validate and establish the capability of the robotic arm. It will serve as a research platform for extended functionality by adding and improving existing software environments and hardware devices. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement v Abstract vi Table of Contents vii List of Figures ix List of Tables x 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Robotic Manipulator 2 1.2. Current Robotics Research 3 1.3. Purpose & Application 6 1.4. Approach 7 2. Literature Survey 9 2.1. Technical Terms 10 2.2. Robot Anatomy 11 2.3. Arm Configuration 16 3. Design 23 3.1. Overview 24 3.2. Torque Calculations 26 3.3. Components 28 4. Analysis 31 4.1. Direct Kinematics 33 5. Fabrication 38 5.1. Materials 39 5.2. Manufacturing- Laser Cutting 42 6. Control 50 6.1. Actuators 51 6.2. Microcontroller 53 6.3. Programming 57 7. Applications & Conclusion 62 7.1. Applications 63 7.2. Conclusion 66 7.3. The Future Scope 66 References 67 Annexure A- CAD Draft Files 68 Annexure B- Circuit Diagram 69 Annexure C- Arduino Program 70 Annexure D- Team Details 74 vii LIST OF FIGURES SR NO. FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE NO. 1 Fig.2.1 The base, arm, wrist, and end effector 11 forming the mechanical structure of a manipulator 2 Fig.2.2 Two rigid binary links in free space 12 3 Fig.2.3 An open kinematic chain formed by joining 12 two links 4 Fig.2.4 Joint types and their symbols 13 5 Fig.2.5 Representation of six degrees of freedom with 14 respect to a coordinate frame 6 Fig.2.6 A two DOF planar manipulator-two links, 14 two joints 7 Fig.2.7 A 3 DOF Cartesian arm configuration and its 17 workspace 8 Fig.2.8 Gantry or box configuration Cartesian 17 manipulator 9 Fig.2.9 A 3-DOF cylindrical arm configuration and 18 its workspace 10 Fig.2.10 A 3 DOF polar arm configuration and its 19 workspace 11 Fig.2.11 A 3 DOF articulated configuration and its 20 workspace 12 Fig.2.12 The SCARA configuration and its workspace 21 13 Fig.2.13 A DOF RPY wrist with three revolute joints 21 14 Fig.2.14 Some fingered grippers for holding different 22 types of jobs 15 Fig. 3.1 An articulated Robotic Arm 25 16 Fig. 3.2 Link Diagram 26 17 Fig. 3.3 Picture of Assembly 1 28 18 Fig. 3.4 Picture of Assembly 2 28 19 Fig. 3.5 Links & Base Plate 29 20 Fig. 3.6 Universal Bracket 30 21 Fig. 3.7 C- Bracket 30 viii 22 Fig. 3.8 Circular Horn 30 23 Fig. 3.9 Servo Motor 30 24 Fig. 3.10 Micro Servo Motor 30 25 Fig.4. 1 D-H parameters 34 26 Fig.4. 2 3 DOF manipulator 35 27 Fig 4. 3 Link 36 28 Fig.5. 1 Laser cutting 42 29 Fig.5. 2 Laser cutting 43 30 Fig.5. 3 CO2 Laser Machine 44 31 Fig.5. 4 Neodymium (Nd) Laser Machine 45 32 Fig.5. 5 Process of Laser cutting 46 33 Fig.5. 6 Machine configuration 48 34 Fig 6. 1 Arduino mega 53 35 Fig 6. 2 50%, 75%, and 25% Duty Cycle Examples 61 36 Fig 7. 1 Stud welding 64 37 Fig 7. 2 Palletizing 65 38 Fig 7. 3 Medical application 65 ix LIST OF TABLES SR. NO. TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE NO. 1 Table 3. 1 Joint and functions 25 2 Table 3. 2 Servo motor dimension 30 3 Table 4. 1 Joint link parameter table 37 4 Table 5. 1 Physical properties of acrylic 39-40 5 Table 6. 1 Pin description of IC 7806 53 6 Table 6. 2 Arduino summary 54 7 Table A Team members 74 x Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 ROBOTIC MANIPULATORS A robotic arm is a type of mechanical arm, usually programmable, with similar functions to a human arm; the arm may be the sum total of the mechanism or may be part of a more complex robot. The links of such a manipulator are connected by joints allowing either rotational motion (such as in an articulated robot) or translational (linear) displacement. The links of the manipulator can be considered to form a kinematic chain. The terminus of the kinematic chain of the manipulator is called the end effector and it is analogous to the human hand. The end effector, or robotic hand, can be designed to perform any desired task such as welding, gripping, spinning etc., depending on the application. For example robot arms in automotive assembly lines perform a variety of tasks such as welding and parts rotation and placement during assembly. In some circumstances, close emulation of the human hand is desired, as in robots designed to conduct bomb disarmament and disposal. The first robotic arm was developed in the 1950s by a scientist named George Devol, Jr., before which robotics were largely the products of science fiction and the imagination. The development of robotics was slow for a while, with many of the most useful applications being involved with space exploration. The use of robots to aid in industrialization weren‘t fully realized until the 1980s, when robotic arms began to be integrated in automobile and other manufacturing assembly lines.
Recommended publications
  • Robotic Systems
    Robotic Systems What is an Industrial Robot? An industrial robot is a programmable, multi-functional manipulator designed to move materials, parts, tools, or special devices through variable programmed motions for the performance of a variety of tasks. An industrial robot consists of a number of rigid links connected by joints of different types, controlled and monitored by a computer. Fundamentals of Robotics and Robotics Technology Power sources for robots 1. Hydraulic drive: gives a robot great speed and strength. These systems can be designed to actuate linear or rotational joints. The main disadvantage of a hydraulic system is that it occupies floor space in addition to that required by the robot. 2. Electric drive: compared with a hydraulic system, an electric system provides a robot with less speed and strength. Accordingly, electric drive systems are adopted for smaller robots. However, robots supported by electric drive systems are more accurate, exhibit better repeatability, and are cleaner to use. 3. Pneumatic drive: are generally used for smaller robots. These robots, with fewer degrees of freedom, carry out simple pick-and-place material handling operations. Robotic sensors 1. Position sensors: are used to monitor the position of joints. Information about the position is fed back to the control systems that are used to determine the accuracy of joint movements. 2. Range sensors: measure distances from the reference point to other points of importance. Range sensing is accomplished by means of television cameras or sonar transmitters and receivers. 3. Velocity sensors: are used to estimate the speed with which a manipulator is moved. The velocity is an important part of dynamic performance of the manipulator.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Robotics: Timeline
    History of Robotics: Timeline This history of robotics is intertwined with the histories of technology, science and the basic principle of progress. Technology used in computing, electricity, even pneumatics and hydraulics can all be considered a part of the history of robotics. The timeline presented is therefore far from complete. Robotics currently represents one of mankind’s greatest accomplishments and is the single greatest attempt of mankind to produce an artificial, sentient being. It is only in recent years that manufacturers are making robotics increasingly available and attainable to the general public. The focus of this timeline is to provide the reader with a general overview of robotics (with a focus more on mobile robots) and to give an appreciation for the inventors and innovators in this field who have helped robotics to become what it is today. RobotShop Distribution Inc., 2008 www.robotshop.ca www.robotshop.us Greek Times Some historians affirm that Talos, a giant creature written about in ancient greek literature, was a creature (either a man or a bull) made of bronze, given by Zeus to Europa. [6] According to one version of the myths he was created in Sardinia by Hephaestus on Zeus' command, who gave him to the Cretan king Minos. In another version Talos came to Crete with Zeus to watch over his love Europa, and Minos received him as a gift from her. There are suppositions that his name Talos in the old Cretan language meant the "Sun" and that Zeus was known in Crete by the similar name of Zeus Tallaios.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Robotics
    Robotics 1 Industrial Robotics Prof. Alessandro De Luca Robotics 1 1 What is a robot? ! industrial definition (RIA = Robotic Institute of America) re-programmable multi-functional manipulator designed to move materials, parts, tools, or specialized devices through variable programmed motions for the performance of a variety of tasks, which also acquire information from the environment and move intelligently in response ! ISO 8373 definition an automatically controlled, reprogrammable, multipurpose manipulator programmable in three or more axes, which may be either fixed in place or mobile for use in industrial automation applications ! more general definition (“visionary”) intelligent connection between perception and action Robotics 1 2 Robots !! Spirit Rover (2002) Comau H4 Waseda WAM-8 (1995) (1984) Robotics 1 3 A bit of history ! Robota (= “work” in slavic languages) are artificial human- like creatures built for being inexpensive workers in the theater play Rossum’s Universal Robots (R.U.R.) written by Karel Capek in 1920 ! Laws of Robotics by Isaac Asimov in I, Robot (1950) 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm 2. A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law Robotics 1 4 Evolution toward industrial robots computer 1950 mechanical numerically controlled telemanipulators machines (CNC) robot manipulators 1970 Unimation PUMA ! with respect to the ancestors ! flexibility of use ! adaptability to a priori unknown conditions ! accuracy in positioning ! repeatability of operation Robotics 1 5 The first industrial robot US Patent General Motor plant, 1961 G.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Program and Book of Abstracts Third Swedish Workshop on Autonomous Robotics SWAR ´05
    Final Program and Book of Abstracts Third Swedish Workshop on Autonomous Robotics SWAR '05 Petter Ögren (Editor) Kista, Stockholm, September 1-2, 2005 FOI-R-- 1756 --SE Systems Technology October 2005 ISSN 1650-1942 Scientific report Final Program and Book of Abstracts Third Swedish Workshop on Autonomous Robotics SWAR ‘05 FOI-R--1756--SE Systems Technology October 2005 ISSN 1650-1942 Scientific report Page 1 of 98 Issuing organization Report number, ISRN Report type FOI – Swedish Defence Research Agency FOI-R—1756--SE Scientific report Systems Technology Research area code SE-164 90 Stockholm 7. Mobility and space technology, incl materials Month year Project no. October 2005 E6941 Sub area code 71 Unmanned Vehicles Sub area code 2 Author/s (editor/s) Project manager Petter Ögren (Editor) Petter Ögren Approved by Monica Dahlén Sponsoring agency FMV Scientifically and technically responsible Karl Henrik Johansson Report title Final Program and Book of Abstracts, Third Swedish Workshop on Autonomous Robotics, SWAR 05 Abstract This document contains the final program and 36 two page extended abstracts from the Third Swedish Workshop on Autonomous Robotics, SWAR’05, organized by FOI in September 1-2, 2005. SWAR is an opportunity for researchers and engineers working in the field of robotics and autonomous systems to learn about activities of neighboring institutions, discuss common interests and initiate new cooperations. The previous workshops, SWAR’00 and SWAR’02, were hosted by Örebro University and KTH, respectively. SWAR’05 gathered more than 80 participants from 25 different organizations, all over Sweden. Keywords Autonomy, Robotics, SWAR, Workshop Further bibliographic information Language English ISSN 1650-1942 Pages 98 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Robot
    1 Introduction 25 1.2 Industrial robots - definition and classification 1.2.1 Definition (ISO 8373:2012) and delimitation The annual surveys carried out by IFR focus on the collection of yearly statistics on the production, imports, exports and domestic installations/shipments of industrial robots (at least three or more axes) as described in the ISO definition given below. Figures 1.1 shows examples of robot types which are covered by this definition and hence included in the surveys. A robot which has its own control system and is not controlled by the machine should be included in the statistics, although it may be dedicated for a special machine. Other dedicated industrial robots should not be included in the statistics. If countries declare that they included dedicated industrial robots, or are suspected of doing so, this will be clearly indicated in the statistical tables. It will imply that data for those countries is not directly comparable with those of countries that strictly adhere to the definition of multipurpose industrial robots. Wafer handlers have their own control system and should be included in the statistics of industrial robots. Wafers handlers can be articulated, cartesian, cylindrical or SCARA robots. Irrespective from the type of robots they are reported in the application “cleanroom for semiconductors”. Flat panel handlers also should be included. Mainly they are articulated robots. Irrespective from the type of robots they are reported in the application “cleanroom for FPD”. Examples of dedicated industrial robots that should not be included in the international survey are: Equipment dedicated for loading/unloading of machine tools (see figure 1.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Planning for Variable Topology Trusses: Reconfiguration and Locomotion
    Journal Title XX(X):1–22 Motion Planning for Variable Topology ©The Author(s) 2021 Trusses: Reconfiguration and Locomotion Chao Liu1, Sencheng Yu2, and Mark Yim1 Abstract Truss robots are highly redundant parallel robotic systems and can be applied in a variety of scenarios. The variable topology truss (VTT) is a class of modular truss robot. As self-reconfigurable modular robots, variable topology trusses are composed of many edge modules that can be rearranged into various structures with respect to different activities and tasks. These robots are able to change their shapes by not only controlling joint positions which is similar to robots with fixed morphologies, but also reconfiguring the connections among modules in order to change their morphologies. Motion planning is the fundamental to apply a VTT robot, including reconfiguration to alter its shape, and non-impact locomotion on the ground. This problem for VTT robots is difficult due to their non-fixed morphologies, high dimensionality, the potential for self-collision, and complex motion constraints. In this paper, a new motion planning framework to dramatically alter the structure of a VTT is presented. It can also be used to solve locomotion tasks much more efficient compared with previous work. Several test scenarios are used to show its effectiveness. Keywords Modular Robots, Parallel Robots, Motion Planning, Reconfiguration Planning, Locomotion 1 Introduction Self-reconfigurable modular robots consist of repeated building blocks (modules) from a small set of types with uniform docking interfaces that allow the transfer of mechanical forces and moments, electrical power, and communication throughout all modules (Yim et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Articulated Robot Motion for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (ARM-SLAM)
    Articulated Robot Motion for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (ARM-SLAM) Matthew Klingensmith1 Siddartha S. Sirinivasa2 Michael Kaess3 Abstract— A robot with a hand-mounted depth sensor scans a scene. When the robot’s joint angles are not known with certainty, how can it best reconstruct the scene? In this work, we simultaneously estimate the joint angles of the robot and reconstruct a dense volumetric model of the scene. In this way, we perform simultaneous localization and mapping in the configuration space of the robot, rather than in the pose space of the camera. We show using simulations and robot experiments that our approach greatly reduces both 3D reconstruction error and joint angle error over simply using the forward kinematics. Unlike other approaches, ours directly reasons about robot joint angles, and can use these to constrain the pose of the sensor. Because of this, it is more robust to missing or ambiguous depth data than approaches that are unconstrained by the robot’s kinematics. I. INTRODUCTION Uncertainty is a central problem in robotics. In order to (a) Experimental setup. understand and interact with the world, robots need to inter- pret signals from noisy sensors to reconstruct clear models not only of the world around them, but also their own internal state. For example, a mobile robot navigating an unknown space must simultaneously reconstruct a model of the world around it, and localize itself against that model using noisy sensor data from wheel odometry, lasers, cameras, or other sensors. This problem (called the Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) problem) is very well-studied in the mobile robotics community.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    College of Applied Science, Payyappady Self-Healing Robots 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 ROBOTS A robot is a mechanical or virtual, artificial agent. It is usually an electromechanical system, which, by its appearance or movements, conveys a sense that it has intent or agency of its own. A typical robot will have several, though not necessarily all of the following properties: Is not 'natural' i.e. has been artificially created. Can sense its environment. Can manipulate things in its environment. Has some degree of intelligence or ability to make choices based on the environment or automatic control / pre-programmed sequence. Is programmable. Can move with one or more axes of rotation or translation. Can make dexterous coordinated movements. Appears to have intent or agency (reification, anthropomorphisation or Pathetic fallacy). Robotic systems are of growing interest because of their many practical applications as well as their ability to help understand human and animal behavior, cognition, and physical performance. Although industrial robots have long been used for repetitive tasks in structured environments, one of the long- standing challenges is achieving robust performance under uncertainty. Most http://vishnur-online.blogspot.com Page | 1 College of Applied Science, Payyappady Self-Healing Robots robotic systems use a manually constructed mathematical model that captures the robot’s dynamics and is then used to plan actions. Although some parametric identification methods exist for automatically improving these models, making accurate models is difficult for complex machines, especially when trying to account for possible topological changes to the body, such as changes resulting from damage. 1.2 ERROR RECOVERY Recovery from error, failure or damage is a major concern in robotics.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Use of Robotics in Airframe Assembly Via Accurate Robot Technology
    2010-01-1846 Expanding the Use of Robotics in Airframe Assembly Via Accurate Robot Technology Russell DeVlieg Electroimpact, Inc. Copyright © 2010 SAE International ABSTRACT Serial link articulated robots applied in aerospace assembly have largely been limited in scope by deficiencies in positional accuracy. The majority of aerospace applications require tolerances of +/-0.25mm or less which have historically been far beyond reach of the conventional off-the-shelf robot. The recent development of the accurate robot technology represents a paradigm shift for the use of articulated robotics in airframe assembly. With the addition of secondary feedback, high-order kinematic model, and a fully integrated conventional CNC control, robotic technology can now compete on a performance level with customized high precision motion platforms. As a result, the articulated arm can be applied to a much broader range of assembly applications that were once limited to custom machines, including one-up assembly, two-sided drilling and fastening, material removal, and automated fiber placement. INTRODUCTION Assembly tolerances in aircraft structures have driven automation manufacturers to design custom, dedicated equipment that will meet accuracy requirements. Though successful, custom machines are relatively expensive, and for shorter term contracts, are difficult to justify as their scope is typically focused on a single application. Production implementations of articulated arm robots in aerospace have been active for many years with varying degrees of success. Interest in them derives from their successful implementation in automotive manufacturing. Robots offer airframe manufacturers benefits in both cost and application flexibility. Because their mass is relatively low, foundation requirements are minimal and often systems can be installed on top of existing slabs.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Accuracy Articulated Mobile Robots 2017-01-2095 Published 09/19/2017
    High-Accuracy Articulated Mobile Robots 2017-01-2095 Published 09/19/2017 Timothy Jackson Electroimpact Inc. CITATION: Jackson, T., "High-Accuracy Articulated Mobile Robots," SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2095, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017- 01-2095. Copyright © 2017 SAE International Abstract feedback methods [2]. Work discussed in this paper addresses particular aspects of maintaining a similar level of accuracy The advent of accuracy improvement methods in robotic arm performance in mobile robotic systems. manipulators have allowed these systems to penetrate applications previously reserved for larger, robustly supported machine A variety of mobile robot architectures implemented in architectures. A benefit of the relative reduced size of serial-link manufacturing endeavors are discussed; specifically, challenges robotic systems is the potential for their mobilization throughout a associated with the mechanical design, control, and calibration of the manufacturing environment. However, the mobility of a system offers systems as these aspects pertain to accuracy performance. The unique challenges in maintaining the high-accuracy requirement of positional accuracy of these systems, measured using a laser tracker, many applications, particularly in aerospace manufacturing. is offered as evidence of the effectiveness of these techniques. The Discussed herein are several aspects of mechanical design, control, core of all the robotic systems discussed is that of the patented and accuracy calibration required to retain accurate motion over large Electroimpact Accurate Robot technology. This consists of a KUKA volumes when utilizing mobile articulated robotic systems. A number Robotics-manufactured articulated robot fitted with secondary of mobile robot system architectures and their measured static feedback devices on each robot joint and controlled by a Siemens accuracy performance are provided in support of the particular 840Dsl CNC.
    [Show full text]
  • Robotics For
    TECHNICAL PROGRESS REPORT ROBOTIC TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE SRS 235-F FACILITY Date Submitted: August 12, 2016 Principal: Leonel E. Lagos, PhD, PMP® FIU Applied Research Center Collaborators: Peggy Shoffner, MS, CHMM, PMP® Himanshu Upadhyay, PhD Alexander Piedra, DOE Fellow SRNL Collaborators: Michael Serrato Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Environmental Management Cooperative Agreement No. DE-EM0000598 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of its contractors, subcontractors, nor their employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any other agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. FIU-ARC-2016-800006472-04c-235 Robotic Technologies for SRS 235F TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet: History of Robotics
    Fact Sheet: History of Robotics www.RazorRobotics.com ≈250 B.C. - Ctesibius, an ancient Greek engineer and mathematician, invented a water clock which was the most accurate for nearly 2000 years. ≈60 A.D. - Hero of Alexandria designs the first automated programmable machine. These 'Automata' were made from a container of gradually releasing sand connected to a spindle via a string. By using different configurations of these pulleys, it was possible to repeatably move a statue on a pre-defined path. 1898 - The first radio-controlled submersible boat was invented by Nikola Tesla. 1921 - The term 'Robot' was coined by Karel Capek in the play 'Rossum's Universal Robots'. 1941 - Isaac Asimov introduced the word 'Robotics' in the science fiction short story 'Liar!' 1948 - William Grey Walter builds Elmer and Elsie, two of the earliest autonomous robots with the appearance of turtles. The robots used simple rules to produce complex behaviours. 1954 - The first silicon transistor was produced by Texas Instruments. 1956 - George Devol applied for a patent for the first programmable robot, later named 'Unimate'. 1957 - Launch of the first artificial satellite, Sputnik 1. I, Robot Turtle robot Sputnik 1 1961 - First Unimate robot installed at General Motors. Used for welding and die casting. 1965 - Gordon E. Moore introduces the concept 'Moore's law', which predicts the number of components on a single chip would double every two years. 1966 - Work began on the 'Shakey' robot at Stanford Research Institute. 'Shakey' was capable of planning, route-finding and moving objects. 1969 - The Apollo 11 mission, puts the first man on the moon.
    [Show full text]