Florida Department of Natural Resources, Marine Research Laboratory
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ecology and Morphology of Copepods Developments in Hydrobiology 102
Ecology and Morphology of Copepods Developments in Hydrobiology 102 Series editor H. J. Dumont Ecology and Morphology of Copepods Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Copepoda, Baltimore, USA, June 6-13, 1993 Edited by Frank D. Ferrari & Brian P. Bradley Reprinted from Hydrobiologia, vo/s 2921293 (1994) Springer-Science+Business Media, BV. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A C.I.P. Catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 978-90-481-4490-7 ISBN 978-94-017-1347-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-1347-4 Printed an acid-free paper AII Rights Reserved © 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht Originally published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in 1994 No part of the material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner. v Contents Preface............................................................................................. ix Photograph and List of Participants x Maxilliped lecture How many copepods? by A.G. Humes 1 Systematics Acartia tonsa: a species new for the Black Sea fauna by G. Belmonte, M.G. Mazzocchi, I.Y. Prusova & N.V. Shadrin ......................... 9 A new species of Erebonectes (Copepoda, Calanoida) from marine caves on Caicos Islands, West Indies by A. Fosshagen & T.M. Iliffe .............................................................. 17 Nomenclature, redescription, and new record from Okinawa of Cymbasoma morii Sekiguchi, 1982 (Monstrilloida) by M.J. Grygier .............................................................................. 23 Copepod phylogeny: a reconsideration of Huys & Boxshall's 'parsimony versus homology' by J-S. -
Copepod Distribution and Production in a Mid-Atlantic Ridge Archipelago
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências (2014) 86(4): 1719-1733 (Annals of the Brazilian Academy of Sciences) Printed version ISSN 0001-3765 / Online version ISSN 1678-2690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420130395 www.scielo.br/aabc Copepod distribution and production in a Mid-Atlantic Ridge archipelago PEDRO A.M.C. MELO1, MAURO DE MELO JÚNIOR2, SILVIO J. DE MACÊDO1, MOACYR ARAUJO1 and SIGRID NEUMANN-LEITÃO1 1Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Departamento de Oceanografia, Av. Arquitetura, s/n, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901 Recife, PE, Brasil 2Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada, Fazenda Saco, s/n, Zona Rural, 56903-970 Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil Manuscript received on October 3, 2013; accepted for publication on March 11, 2014 ABSTRACT The Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago (SPSPA) are located close to the Equator in the Atlantic Ocean. The aim of this study was to assess the spatial variations in the copepod community abundance, and the biomass and production patterns of the three most abundant calanoid species in the SPSPA. Plankton samples were collected with a 300 µm mesh size net along four transects (north, east, south and west of the SPSPA), with four stations plotted in each transect. All transects exhibited a tendency toward a decrease in copepod density with increasing distance from the SPSPA, statistically proved in the North. Density varied from 3.33 to 182.18 ind.m-3, and differences were also found between the first perimeter (first circular distance band) and the others. The total biomass varied from 15.25 to 524.50 10-3 mg C m-3 and production from 1.19 to 22.04 10-3 mg C m-3d-1. -
Supplementary Figure 1. Tintinnid Ciliates (A, B, C, D) and Radiolaria (E, F, G) Collected by the Bottle Net Between 2,000-4,000 M
a) b) c) d) 20 µm e) f) g) 40 µm Supplementary Figure 1. Tintinnid ciliates (A, B, C, D) and radiolaria (E, F, G) collected by the bottle net between 2,000-4,000 m. 1 Supplementary Figure 2. Cytograms of some selected surface and deep ocean samples. The samples were stained with SybrGreen I, a DNA stain that targets nucleic acids and, thus, stain all microbes, phototroph or autotroph. However, those microbes that have red autofluorescence from the chlorophyll a, appear in a different diagonal when plotting red vs. green (SybrGreen) fluorescence. They are indicated as “pa”, while the bacteria and archaea are labelled as “bt”. Reference 1 µm Yellow-Green Polysciences beads were added as internal standards (labelled “b”). A) A surface sample, Station 40 at 70 m, ratio bt/pa= 11.8; B) Station 110, at 2000 m, ratio bt/pa= 6.1; C) Station 126, at 2200 m ratio bt/pa= 6.2; and D) Stn 113, at 3850 m, ratio bt/pa= 9.1. 2 A B C ) -1 D E F Ln Alive cell concentration (cells L (cells cell concentration Alive Ln Time (days) Supplementary Figure 3. Mortality of surface phytoplankton cells in the dark. The decline in the number of alive cells of phytoplankton sampled at the surface layer declined with time when maintained in the dark and at cold temperature, conditions encountered during their possible sinking transient from the surface to the deep ocean. (A) Trichodesmium sp. (p <0.001); (B) centric diatom (p <0.05); (C) Ceratium sp. (p <0.01); (D) Ceratium spp. -
Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come?
Microorganisms 2013, 1, 3-25; doi:10.3390/microorganisms1010003 OPEN ACCESS microorganisms ISSN 2076-2607 www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms Review Understanding Bioluminescence in Dinoflagellates—How Far Have We Come? Martha Valiadi 1,* and Debora Iglesias-Rodriguez 2 1 Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Strasse, Plӧn 24306, Germany 2 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +49-4522-763277; Fax: +49-4522-763310. Received: 3 May 2013; in revised form: 20 August 2013 / Accepted: 24 August 2013 / Published: 5 September 2013 Abstract: Some dinoflagellates possess the remarkable genetic, biochemical, and cellular machinery to produce bioluminescence. Bioluminescent species appear to be ubiquitous in surface waters globally and include numerous cosmopolitan and harmful taxa. Nevertheless, bioluminescence remains an enigmatic topic in biology, particularly with regard to the organisms’ lifestyle. In this paper, we review the literature on the cellular mechanisms, molecular evolution, diversity, and ecology of bioluminescence in dinoflagellates, highlighting significant discoveries of the last quarter of a century. We identify significant gaps in our knowledge and conflicting information and propose some important research questions -
A Comparative Study on the Affinities for Inorganic Carbon Uptake, Nitrate and Phosphate Between Marine Diatoms and Dinoflagellates
A comparative study on the affinities for inorganic carbon uptake, nitrate and phosphate between marine diatoms and dinoflagellates Mr. T. (Thomas) Hofman - 11066938 Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) Supervised by: mw. dr. J.H.M. Verspagen Abstract: Eutrophication and increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations are water quality concerns threatening our drinking water and food supply due to a rise in harmful cyanobacterial and harmful algal blooms. Understanding which factors determine the species distribution of phytoplankton could help to prevent the increase of these blooms in the future. Growth is thought to be limited by the scarcest resource available. As eutrophic waters are, by definition, rich in macronutrients such as nitrate and phosphate, inorganic carbon limitation becomes more significant in population dynamics as a limiting factor. Moreover, due to increased growth rates in eutrophied oceans, inorganic carbon depletes faster. An in silico literature research on the the affinity for phosphate, nitrate and inorganic carbon in marine diatom and dinoflagellate species gave insights in species distribution, based on in vivo uptake kinetics, field measurements and uptake mechanisms of both taxonomic groups. The affinity for nitrate and inorganic carbon was significantly higher dinoflagellates. This difference could explain the species composition in marine environments. According to findings in this research, dinoflagellates are better adapted, based on their affinity for nutrients and inorganic carbon, to oligotrophic and Ci depleted environments. 1. Introduction Phytoplankton blooms can severely decrease water quality, threatening drinking water and food supply. Anthropogenic increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations and nutrient enrichment alter hydrological patterns and strongly influence the duration, frequency and intensity of harmful cyanobacterial blooms (HCB’s) (Visser et al, 2016) and harmful algal blooms (HAB’s) (Smith and Schindler, 2009). -
Novel and Rapidly Diverging Intergenic Sequences Between Tandem Repeats of the Luciferase Genes in Seven Dinoflagellate Species1
J. Phycol. 42, 96–103 (2005) r 2005 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00165.x NOVEL AND RAPIDLY DIVERGING INTERGENIC SEQUENCES BETWEEN TANDEM REPEATS OF THE LUCIFERASE GENES IN SEVEN DINOFLAGELLATE SPECIES1 Liyun Liu and J. Woodland Hastings2 Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA Tandemly arranged luciferase genes were previ- Our previous studies of the structure of dinoflagel- ously reported in two dinoflagellates species, but lates genes and their circadian regulation revealed that their intergenic regions were strikingly different several occur in tandemly arranged copies (Le et al. and no canonical promoter sequences were found. 1997, Li and Hastings 1998, Okamoto et al. 2001). Here, we examined the intergenic regions of the Other than for ribosomal genes (Sollner-Webb and luciferase genes of five other dinoflagellate species Tower 1986) and a few protein-coding genes in two along with those of the earlier two. In all cases, the protozoa, Trypanosoma brucei and Babesia bovis (Lee and genes exist in multiple copies and are arranged Van der Ploeg 1997, Suarez et al. 1998), such an ar- tandemly, coding for proteins of similar sizes and rangement is not known in other eukaryotes. Indeed, sequences. However, the 50 untranslated region, 30 it is well known that the dinoflagellate nucleus is very untranslated region, and intergenic regions of the unusual; its envelope remains intact throughout the seven genes differ greatly in length and sequence, cell cycle, with the separation of the chromosomes in except for two stretches that are conserved in the mitosis being carried out by an external mitotic spindle intergenic regions of two pairs of phylogenetically (Taylor 1987). -
Stress-Induced Dinoflagellate Bioluminescence at the Single Cell Level
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 125, 028102 (2020) Editors' Suggestion Featured in Physics Stress-Induced Dinoflagellate Bioluminescence at the Single Cell Level Maziyar Jalaal ,1 Nico Schramma ,1,2 Antoine Dode ,1,3 H´el`ene de Maleprade ,1 Christophe Raufaste ,1,4 and Raymond E. Goldstein 1,* 1Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom 2Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, 37077 Göttingen, Germany 3LadHyX, UMR 7646 du CNRS, École polytechnique, 91120 Palaiseau, France 4Universit´e Côte d’Azur, CNRS, Institut de Physique de Nice, CNRS, 06100 Nice, France (Received 18 March 2020; accepted 26 May 2020; published 6 July 2020) One of the characteristic features of many marine dinoflagellates is their bioluminescence, which lights up nighttime breaking waves or seawater sliced by a ship’s prow. While the internal biochemistry of light production by these microorganisms is well established, the manner by which fluid shear or mechanical forces trigger bioluminescence is still poorly understood. We report controlled measurements of the relation between mechanical stress and light production at the single cell level, using high-speed imaging of micropipette-held cells of the marine dinoflagellate Pyrocystis lunula subjected to localized fluid flows or direct indentation. We find a viscoelastic response in which light intensity depends on both the amplitude and rate of deformation, consistent with the action of stretch-activated ion channels. A phenomenological -
Observing Copepods Through a Genomic Lens James E Bron1*, Dagmar Frisch2, Erica Goetze3, Stewart C Johnson4, Carol Eunmi Lee5 and Grace a Wyngaard6
Bron et al. Frontiers in Zoology 2011, 8:22 http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/8/1/22 DEBATE Open Access Observing copepods through a genomic lens James E Bron1*, Dagmar Frisch2, Erica Goetze3, Stewart C Johnson4, Carol Eunmi Lee5 and Grace A Wyngaard6 Abstract Background: Copepods outnumber every other multicellular animal group. They are critical components of the world’s freshwater and marine ecosystems, sensitive indicators of local and global climate change, key ecosystem service providers, parasites and predators of economically important aquatic animals and potential vectors of waterborne disease. Copepods sustain the world fisheries that nourish and support human populations. Although genomic tools have transformed many areas of biological and biomedical research, their power to elucidate aspects of the biology, behavior and ecology of copepods has only recently begun to be exploited. Discussion: The extraordinary biological and ecological diversity of the subclass Copepoda provides both unique advantages for addressing key problems in aquatic systems and formidable challenges for developing a focused genomics strategy. This article provides an overview of genomic studies of copepods and discusses strategies for using genomics tools to address key questions at levels extending from individuals to ecosystems. Genomics can, for instance, help to decipher patterns of genome evolution such as those that occur during transitions from free living to symbiotic and parasitic lifestyles and can assist in the identification of genetic mechanisms and accompanying physiological changes associated with adaptation to new or physiologically challenging environments. The adaptive significance of the diversity in genome size and unique mechanisms of genome reorganization during development could similarly be explored. -
Atoll Research Bulletin No. 247 Species Composition And
ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 247 SPECIES COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE OF LAGOON ZOOPLANKTON AT ENIWETAK ATOLL, MARSHALL ISLANDS by Ray P. Gerber Issued by THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Washington, D. C., U.S.A. July 1981 ENEWETAK ATOLL MARSHALL ISLANDS LAGOON STATION 2 8 PASS \ DEEP CHANNEL ENEWETAK ISLAND - 0 10 SOUTH PASS -~rn (WIDE CHANNEL) Figure 1. Enewetak Atoll, with sampling stations (1) and (2) indicated SPECIES COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE OF LAGOON ZOOPLANKTON AT ENIWETAK ATOLL, MARSHALL ISLANDS by Ray P. Gerberl ABSTRACT The species composition and abundance of lagoon zooplankton were studied from net tows made during two winters (January-February, 1972; 1974) and one summer (June-August, 1974) at a mid-lagoon station, and during the winter of 1972 at a shallow back-reef area. About 124 zooplanktonic organisms were identified, which included many species not previously reported from this lagoon. Copepods, chaetognaths and larvaceans which dominated at the mid- lagoon station were much lower in abundance at the shallow station. At the mid-lagoon station about 56 of the more abundant species increased in abundance during the summer, while 3 species were collected only in the summer; 4 species increased in abundance during the winter, while about 4 species were collected only in the winter; and about 30 species lacked a seasonal preference. The species diversity (Shannon-Wiener and Brillouin indices) of the lagoon zooplankton, which ranged from about 3.8 to 3.9, was not significantly different for the winter and summer populations. hisl lack of a difference in diversity may be due to certain limitations inherent in such indices when used to describe complex communities. -
Molecular Phylogeny of Tintinnid Ciliates (Tintinnida, Ciliophora)
Protist, Vol. 163, 873–887, November 2012 http://www.elsevier.de/protis Published online date 9 February 2012 ORIGINAL PAPER Molecular Phylogeny of Tintinnid Ciliates (Tintinnida, Ciliophora) a b a c Charles Bachy , Fernando Gómez , Purificación López-García , John R. Dolan , and a,1 David Moreira a Unité d’Ecologie, Systématique et Evolution, CNRS UMR 8079, Université Paris-Sud, Bâtiment 360, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France b Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Universidad de Valencia, PO Box 22085, 46071 Valencia, Spain c Université Pierre et Marie Curie and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR 7093, Laboratoire d’Océanographie de Villefranche, Marine Microbial Ecology, Station Zoologique, B.P. 28, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France Submitted October 6, 2011; Accepted January 4, 2012 Monitoring Editor: Hervé Philippe We investigated the phylogeny of tintinnids (Ciliophora, Tintinnida) with 62 new SSU-rDNA sequences from single cells of 32 marine and freshwater species in 20 genera, including the first SSU-rDNA sequences for Amphorides, Climacocylis, Codonaria, Cyttarocylis, Parundella, Petalotricha, Undella and Xystonella, and 23 ITS sequences of 17 species in 15 genera. SSU-rDNA phylogenies sug- gested a basal position for Eutintinnus, distant to other Tintinnidae. We propose Eutintinnidae fam. nov. for this divergent genus, keeping the family Tintinnidae for Amphorellopsis, Amphorides and Steenstrupiella. Tintinnopsis species branched in at least two separate groups and, unexpectedly, Climacocylis branched among Tintinnopsis sensu stricto species. Tintinnopsis does not belong to the family Codonellidae, which is restricted to Codonella, Codonaria, and also Dictyocysta (formerly in the family Dictyocystidae). The oceanic genus Undella branched close to an undescribed fresh- water species. -
RHODES MELANIE 33.Pdf
VITA Melanie Anne Rhodes, daughter of Terry S. (Wood) Rhodes-Forsberg and Jay S. Forsberg, was born on November 16, 1979 in Phoenix, AZ. She graduated from Calvert Senior High School in Prince Frederick, MD in June 1997. In August 1997, she entered Long Island University-Southampton College in Southampton, NY. She graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Marine Science, Biology concentration in May 2001. While attending college, she gained work experience through internships at the Wisconsin Aquatic Technology and Environmental Research Institute in Milwaukee, WI and the Chesapeake Biological Laboratory in Solomons, MD. She participated in the SEAmester program in the Fall of 1999, sailing from Boston, MA to San Juan, PR, on the tall ship, Harvey Gamage. During the Winter 2001 term she participated in a Tropical Marine Biology program in the South Pacific islands of the Kingdom of Tonga. From March 2001 to September 2001, she was employed by the East Hampton Town Shellfish Hatchery in Montuak, NY as a Hatchery and Field Technician. Returning to Maryland, she was employed from January 2002 to March 2003 as an Aquatic Biologist by Wildlife International, Ltd. in Easton, MD. From April 2003 to June 2003 she lived on board the Schooner A.J. Meerwald working as a Deckhand and Environmental Educator. In September 2003, she entered the Master of Science Program at Auburn University. iv THESIS ABSTRACT EVALUATION OF FABREA SALINA AND OTHER CILIATES AS ALTERNATIVE LIVE FOODS FOR FIRST-FEEDING RED SNAPPER, LUTJANUS CAMPECHANUS, LARVAE Melanie Anne Rhodes Master of Science, August 8, 2005 (B.S. -
AGUIDE to Frle DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES of COMMON COASTAL
A GUIDE TO frlE DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES OF COMMON COASTAL, GeORGES BANK AND GULF OF MAINE COPEPODS BY Janet A. Murphy and Rosalind E. Cohen National Marine Fisheries Service Northeast Fisheries Center Woods Hole Laboratory Woods Hole, MA 02543 Laboratory Reference No. 78-53 Table of Contents List of Plates i,,;i,i;i Introduction '. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 1 Acarti a cl aus; .. 2 Aca rtia ton sa .. 3 Aca rtia danae .. 4 Acartia long; rem; s co e"" 5 Aetidi us artllatus .. 6 A1teutha depr-e-s-s-a· .. 7 Calanu5 finmarchicus .............•............................ 8 Calanus helgolandicus ~ 9 Calanus hyperboreus 10 Calanus tenuicornis .......................•................... 11 Cal oca 1anus pavo .....................•....•....•.............. 12 Candaci a armata Ii II .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 13 Centropages bradyi............................................ 14 Centropages hama tus .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 15 ~ Centropages typi cus " .. " 0 16 Clausocalanus arcuicornis ..............................•..•... 17 Clytemnestra rostra~ta ................................•.•........ 18 Corycaeus speciosus........................................... 19 Eucalanus elongatu5 20 Euchaeta mar; na " . 21 Euchaeta norveg; ca III co .. 22 Euchirel1a rostrata . 23 Eurytemora ameri cana .......................................•.. 24 Eurytemora herdmani , . 25 Eurytemora hi rundoi des . 26 Halithalestris croni ..................•......................