DOCSLIB.ORG

Title 9 Counties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Title 9 Counties NOTICE: The Delaware Code appearing on this site is prepared by the Delaware Code Revisors and the editorial staff of LexisNexis in cooperation with the Division of Research of Legislative Council of the General Assembly, and is considered an official version of the State of Delaware statutory code. This version includes all acts effective as of August 19, 2021, up to and including 83 Del. Laws, c. 126. DISCLAIMER: With respect to the Delaware Code documents available from this site or server, neither the State of Delaware nor any of its employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, including the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately-owned rights. Please seek legal counsel for help on interpretation of individual statutes. Title 9 - Counties Part I Provisions Affecting All Counties Chapter 1 Boundaries of Counties and Hundreds § 101. Division of State into counties. The State is divided into 3 counties: New Castle, Kent and Sussex. (Code 1852, § 5; Code 1915, § 8; Code 1935, § 8; 9 Del. C. 1953, § 101.) § 102. New Castle County boundaries. New Castle County comprises that part of the State which is bounded as follows: On the north, by the State of Pennsylvania; on the east, by low watermark on the eastern side of the Delaware River within the 12-mile circle described from New Castle, the southerly perimeter of the circle from its intersection with the low watermark westerly to the middle line of Delaware River, the middle lines of Delaware River and Bay southerly to a point in the last mentioned line opposite the mouth of Smyrna River; on the south, by a line drawn by the shortest distance from the last mentioned point in the middle line of the Delaware Bay to the mouth of Smyrna River, thence by a line westerly through the thoroughfare north of Bombay Hook Island, and up the Smyrna River to the mouth of a branch issuing from the main branch of the River, at a point opposite, on the Kent side, land formerly of Enoch Jones, and opposite, on the New Castle side, lands formerly of Richard Nash, and running thence westwardly up the branch the several courses thereof 602 perches to a point, where formerly stood a white oak tree, a corner for lands formerly of Benjamin Hazel and lands formerly of Richard Hollet, at the head of the branch; and from thence continued due west 1708 perches till it intersects the tangent or divisional line between the States of Delaware and Maryland, where the same crosses the Cypress Branch; and on the west by the State of Maryland. (Code 1852, § 6; 19 Del. Laws, c. 835; 20 Del. Laws, c. 147; 20 Del. Laws, c. 629; 20 Del. Laws, c. 650; Code 1915, § 9; Code 1935, § 9; 9 Del. C. 1953, § 102.) § 103. Kent County boundaries. Kent County comprises that part of the State which is bounded as follows: On the north, by the southerly boundary line of New Castle County, as described in § 102 of this title; on the east, by the middle line of Delaware Bay from the point where the same is intersected by the southerly boundary line of New Castle County to a point in the middle line of the Bay nearest to the centre line of Mispillion River at the mouth thereof; on the south, by a line drawn by the shortest distance from the last mentioned point in the middle line of the Bay to the centre line of Mispillion River at the mouth thereof, thence up the Mispillion River the several courses thereof to a fork of the River, the point being marked by a large stone buried in the west side of a Mill Dam at the junction of Tan Trough Branch with Beaver Dam 3 8 Branch (a small maple marked with 6 chops bears south 76 /4 degrees west /10 of a perch from the stone, and a sweet gum on the east 3 side of the Mill Dam marked with 6 chops bears south 44 /4 degrees east 2.23 perches from the stone); and running thence up and with the middle of the run of the Tan Trough Branch the several meanderings thereof, the general trend of which Branch is in a southwesterly 1 direction, about 874.7 perches to a stone monument (No. 1) set at the head of the Tan Trough Branch; thence running south 27 /2 degrees west a distance of 480 perches to another stone monument (No. 3) set in the corner of the front yard attached to the dwelling owned and occupied by James L. Jump; thence running south 69 degrees and 50 minutes west a distance 299.1 perches to a point in the middle of 4 the bridge over the division line ditch between the Counties of Kent and Sussex (the point is south 69 degrees and 50 minutes west /10 of a perch from a stone monument (No. 4) set on the east bank of the ditch in the north side of the public road); thence running down and with the middle of the run of the division line ditch the several meanderings thereof, the general trend of which ditch is in a southwesterly direction, a distance of about 500.5 perches to a point in the junction of this ditch with the ditch of the main branch of Nanticoke River; this same point bears south 86 degrees and 51 minutes east 2 perches from a stone monument (No. 5) set in the northeast side of the public road and in the next mentioned line; thence running north 86 degrees and 51 minutes west and at a distance of 2 perches passes stone monument (No. 5); thence crossing fields, swamps, striking across the middle of Marshy Hope Bridge in a diagonal direction the whole 1 distance being 2870 /4 perches to a stone monument (No. 14) set in the dividing line between the States of Maryland and Delaware, this being the terminus of the division line between the Counties of Kent and Sussex; and on the west by the State of Maryland. (Code 1852, § 7; 19 Del. Laws, c. 835; 20 Del. Laws, c. 147; 20 Del. Laws, c. 629; 20 Del. Laws, c. 650; Code 1915, § 9; Code 1935, § 9; 9 Del. C. 1953, § 103.) § 104. Sussex County boundaries. Sussex County comprises that part of the State which is bounded as follows: On the north, by the southerly boundary line of Kent County as described in § 103 of this title; on the east, by the middle line of Delaware Bay from the point where the same is intersected by southerly boundary line of Kent County to the mouth of the Bay, and by the Atlantic Ocean; on the south and west by the State of Maryland. (Code 1852, § 7; 19 Del. Laws, c. 835; 20 Del. Laws, c. 147; 20 Del. Laws, c. 629; 20 Del. Laws, c. 650; Code 1915, § 9; Code 1935, § 9; 9 Del. C. 1953, § 104.) Page 1 Title 9 - Counties § 105. Hundreds in New Castle County; boundaries. (a) New Castle County is divided into 11 hundreds, as follows: Appoquinimink, Blackbird, Brandywine, Christiana, Mill Creek, New Castle, Pencader, Red Lion, St. Georges, White Clay Creek and Wilmington. (b) Brandywine Hundred comprises that part of New Castle County which is bounded as follows: Beginning at the point where low watermark on the westerly side of the Delaware River is intersected by the northerly boundary line of the State of Delaware; thence by the boundary line, crossing the Delaware River, to low watermark on the easterly side of the Delaware River; thence by the last mentioned low watermark to the point where the last mentioned low watermark is intersected by the northerly boundary line of the City of Wilmington; thence by the present boundary lines dividing Brandywine Hundred from the City of Wilmington, Christiana Hundred, and the State of Pennsylvania, to the place of beginning. (c) Wilmington Hundred comprises that part of New Castle County described as follows: (1) All that part of New Castle County which is included within the corporate limits of the City of Wilmington; (2) All territory which shall hereafter be added to and included within the City of Wilmington shall become part of Wilmington Hundred; (3) Whenever by the extension of the limits of the City of Wilmington, territory forming part of any hundred as hereby established, shall be included within the limits of the City, such hundred shall thereafter consist of the residue thereof not so included within the limits. (d) New Castle Hundred comprises that part of New Castle County which is bounded as follows: Beginning at the point where low watermark on the westerly side of the Delaware River is intersected by the southerly boundary line of the City of Wilmington; thence by the boundary line, crossing the Delaware River to the low watermark on the easterly side of the Delaware River; thence by the last mentioned low watermark to a point which is due east of the point where the boundary line between New Castle Hundred and Red Lion Hundred intersects the low watermark on the westerly side of the Delaware River; thence due west to low watermark on the westerly side of the Delaware River; thence by the present boundary lines dividing New Castle Hundred from Red Lion Hundred, Pencader Hundred, White Clay Creek Hundred, Christiana Hundred and the City of Wilmington, to the place of beginning.
Recommended publications
  • Bridge Index

    Bridge Index

    Co Br# Page Facility Carried Featured Intersedtion Co Br# Page Facility Carried Featured Intersedtion 1 001 12 2-G RISING SUN RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 087 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD BURRIS RUN 1 001A 12 2-G RISING SUN RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 088 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD TRIB OF RED CLAY CREEK 1 001B 12 2-F KENNETT PIKE WATERWAY & ABANDON RR 1 089 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD. WATERWAY 1 002 9 12-G ROCKLAND RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 090 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD. WATERWAY 1 003 9 11-G THOMPSON BRIDGE RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 091 9 10-C SNUFF MILL RD. WATERWAY 1 004P 13 3-B PEDESTRIAN NORTHEAST BLVD 1 092 9 11-E KENNET PIKE (DE 52) 1 006P 12 4-G PEDESTRIAN UNION STREET 1 093 9 10-D SNUFF MILL RD WATERWAY 1 007P 11 8-H PEDESTRIAN OGLETOWN STANTON RD 1 096 9 11-D OLD KENNETT ROAD WATERWAY 1 008 9 9-G BEAVER VALLEY RD. BEAVER VALLEY CREEK 1 097 9 11-C OLD KENNETT ROAD WATERWAY 1 009 9 9-G SMITHS BRIDGE RD BRANDYWINE CREEK 1 098 9 11-C OLD KENNETT ROAD WATERWAY 1 010P 10 12-F PEDESTRIAN I 495 NB 1 099 9 11-C OLD KENNETT RD WATERWAY 1 011N 12 1-H SR 141NB RD 232, ROCKLAND ROAD 1 100 9 10-C OLD KENNETT RD. WATERWAY 1 011S 12 1-H SR 141SB RD 232, ROCKLAND ROAD 1 105 9 12-C GRAVES MILL RD TRIB OF RED CLAY CREEK 1 012 9 10-H WOODLAWN RD.
  • Sussex County

    Sussex County

    501 ALLOWANCES AND APPROPRIATIONS. Dolls. Ct,. Amount brought forward, 3,3137 58 To Lowder T. Layton, for damages on new road, 15 00 Albert Webster, do do 05 Appropriation for opening and making said road, 20 00 William K. Lockwood, commissioner on road, 2 days, 2 00 Albert Webster, do 3 3 00 T. L. Davis, do 3 3 00 George Jones, do 2 2 00 William Nickerson, do 2 2 00 Alexander Johnson, surveyor, 7 00 John Cox, for damages on road, 50 00 William Slay, do 06 David Marvel, do 06 Martha Day, do 06 Appropriation to open and make said road, 150 00 $3,642 31 March Session. Thomas S. Buckmaster, for overwork under a resolu- tion, 3 89 Isaac L. Crouch, for work on jail, 87 Joshua Nickerson, for work on a bridge, 2 08 S. C. Leatherberry, cryer of the courts, 20 62 Joab Fox, for work on a bridge, 9 87 James Jones, assessor for Duck Creek hundred, 29 38 Nathan Soward, Little Creek " 25 56 William Slaughter, Dover, " 27 56 John Sherwood, Murderkill, " 34 02 John Quillen, Milford, " 26 46 Henry W. Harrington, Mispillion, " 27 00 Dr. Isaac Jump, for medicine for prisoners in jail, 4 50 William Hirons, commissioner on road, 1 00 Thomas Stevenson, justice peace, for fees, 15 35 Alexander J. Taylor, late sheriff, board of prisoners and fees, 352 51 James B. Richardson, coroner, for fees, 17 23 John P. Coombe, justice of the peace, for fees, I 00 George Smith, commissioner oo new road, 1 00 Joho Ha wk ins, for excess of tax, for the years 1848-9, 12 98 John Sherwood, for services dividing school districts, I 00 Am,unt carried forward, $4,356 19 502 ALLOWANCES AND APPROPRIATIONS.
  • The Results of the Phase II Deldot Investigations at 7NC-E 53 Indicate

    The Results of the Phase II Deldot Investigations at 7NC-E 53 Indicate

    SITE INTERPRETATIONS The results of the Phase II DelDOT investigations at 7NC-E­ 53 indicate that the historic component of the site is undisturbed and in good condition. The site represents a farmstead and possible landing operation dating from the mid­ eighteenth to nineteenth century, and was owned at one time by a prominent local merchant, John Read. The site was occupied continuously throughout the nineteenth century, yet there is archaeological evidence that middle-to-late eighteenth century deposits are present in good stratigraphic contexts. Much of the site, particularly around the foundation, is unplowed. The historic artifacts recovered show archaeological evidence of historic sheet refuse disposal patterns. WILLIAM DICKSON SITE (7NC-E-82) INVESTIGATIONS SITE mSTORY Of all three sites investigated in the Patterson Lane Site Complex, the Dickson Site is the most difficult to trace historically. The site's history is easily followed backwards in time until 1844, then the trail of deed transactions and property transfers becomes murky and fragmentary. Table 8 presents a summary of the deed transactions for the Dickson Site. The property, which is presently owned by William T. Neal, Jr., was acquired by William T. Neal, Sr., in 1919 from George W. Butler of Christiana Village (NCCD N-28-260). Butler had bought the land, which consisted of 5.7 acres, from the heirs of Daniel Heisler Egbert in 1912 for $1000. There was a bUilding present 109 " ' TABLE 8 I DICKSON SITE (7NC-E-82), SUMMARY OF PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS Name (from/to) Reference Date Acreage Cost William T. Neal, WCCH N-28-260 11-15-1919 5.7a $500 from George Butler and wife, WCCH George Butler, WCCH B-24-184 9-11-1912 5.7a $1,000 from Henderson R.
  • This Report Describes the Research Methods and Plans, Excavations

    This Report Describes the Research Methods and Plans, Excavations

    INTRODUCTION This report describes the research methods and plans, excavations, analyses, and results of the archaeological investigations of the Patterson Lane Site Complex, near Christiana, New Castle County, Delaware (Figure 1). The Patterson Lane Site Complex consists of three separate historic sites: the Patterson Lane Site (7NC-E-53), the William Dickson Site (7NC-E-82), and the Heisler Tenancy Site (7NC-E-83) (Figure 2 and Plate 1). Archaeological investigations were conducted on the sites within the complex as part of the cultural resources survey of the planned realignment of Delaware Route 7 around the town of Christiana, which in turn was part of a larger upgrading and realignment of Route 7 from 1-95 to U.S. 13 (see Catts et al. 1988a). Phase I survey and testing and Phase II investigations of the sites were funded by the Delaware Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration, and were undertaken to fulfill regulatory obligations under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (amended) to evaluate the effects of the proposed relocation and realignment of Delaware Route 7 on significant, or potentially significant, cultural resources as defined by the National Register of Historic Places (36 CFR 60). The Patterson Lane excavations were conducted in the summer of 1982 by archaeologists of the Delaware Department of Transportation. Phase I and II field investigations of the Dickson and Heisler Sites were undertaken in the winter and spring of 1986 by archaeologists from the University of Delaware, 1 Center for Archaeological Research (UDCAR). Preliminary artifact cataloging and analysis was performed on the Patterson Lane Site artifact assemblage by the DelDOT archaeologists, and final artifact cataloging and analysis, and report preparation for all three sites were conducted by UDCAR in 1987.
  • Residents Happy with Newark's Quality of Life

    Residents Happy with Newark's Quality of Life

    •••• Greater Newark's Hometown Newspaper Since 1910 .:• 101 st Year, 24th Issue © 2010 July 2, 2010 www.newarkpostonllne.com Newark, Del. Fireworks Residents happy with and more Newark's quality of life By MARK CORRIGAN the form. The survey is released to 78 percent) in favorability every five years, with the last one over 2004's rating. Traffic con­ [email protected] mailed out in 2004. trol and repairing of major and The City of Newark Parks Approximately 1,200 forms neighborhood streets all showed and Recreation Department were returned, producing a a double-digit increase in favor­ Monday night's Mayor & will help local residents return rate of about 25 percent. ability, while bike lanes and City Council meeting reviewed celebrate the 4th of July A sample of 600 questionnaires trails, recreation programs, and the results of a questionnaire with entertainment, com­ was selected, 100 randomly cho­ UNICITY Bus favorability rat­ mailed to 4,300 homes last May, munity information and food sen from each district, to produce ings all showed slight decreases showing that an overwhelming vendors and fireworks. The a sample group that gave a 95 since the last survey. number of residents are either percent confidence level, with a City services rated as the five event will take place at happy or satisfied with what the University of Delaware 3.5 percent margin of error. most important were police pro­ Newark has to offer. About 98 percent of resi­ tection, electric service, trash! Athletic Complex, at the cor­ The 2009 survey was com­ dents reported that they were garbage collection, water quality, ner of Routes 896 and 4 in prised of ten questions that rated either "very satisfied" or "satis­ and major street repairs.
  • Delawarehousejournal

    Delawarehousejournal

    UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE THE LIBRARY \J ...,, ~. ;"'iY/:'4 .!"· ,II /J )' ;!':'. ·,;.r J $·7~ •7.f.-.f'.' J't' ~ JOURNAL OF THE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AT A SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSE:M:BLY, CONVEXED AND HELD AT DOVER, ON TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY, IN THE YEAR OF OUU f,ORD ONE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED AND FIFTY-THREE, AND OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE UI\JITED ST ATES, THE SEVENTY.SEVENTH. DOVER, DELAWARE: ~· KIMMEY, PRINTER, 1853. • .. • • • • • • • • • f' • • • • • .v".. :.. ". ·.~;: \ ... :· :·.: =·~: : ·.. : . ... ... ; . .... ,, . .. .. .. \ I . •H., \ ~ ,./, ... ,, .. ·-. ,.., '"1t"- ~. ,.,,.: • '. '.\.., l "" ~ ' , : :·: : :·:: . : : .. : ... : : : ·.•: ... :: ... ........ ... ...... :.-. : .. : ..~: : . : • • • : ... u • ... • : •••• : . ·.: ... ... ... .. .. ... ... ... ... .... ... ··: ... .. =~~:· ... • . ... ... .. •. ... .. ... .. .. ..• _I • . .... ... e .. .. ... .. ... :·:.. .. .... ... Gx,::, -·r. t: \. ~ ~ -~ .. , t \·\' • I cl t.. \·1 --~. ~.. · JOURNAL OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE STATE OF DELA\VARE. At a sessio11 ef the General Assembly, convened and held at Dover, on Tuesday, the fourth day ef January, in the year ef our Lord one thousand eight hundred and fifty-three, and of the Independence ef the United States ef America, the seventy-seventh. Messrs. James Delaplaine, Jesher H. Dixon, Alexander M. Biddle, Charles Gooding, Joshua S. Vaientine, John A. Reynolds and Ephraim Beaston, of New Castle county; and Messrs. Benjamin L. Collins, John G. Chambers, Paris T. Carlisle, Eli Saulsbury, Merritt Scotten,
  • Underground Railroad Byway Delaware

    Underground Railroad Byway Delaware

    Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway Delaware Chapter 3.0 Intrinsic Resource Assessment The following Intrinsic Resource Assessment chapter outlines the intrinsic resources found along the corridor. The National Scenic Byway Program defines an intrinsic resource as the cultural, historical, archeological, recreational, natural or scenic qualities or values along a roadway that are necessary for designation as a Scenic Byway. Intrinsic resources are features considered significant, exceptional and distinctive by a community and are recognized and expressed by that community in its comprehensive plan to be of local, regional, statewide or national significance and worthy of preservation and management (60 FR 26759). Nationally significant resources are those that tend to draw travelers or visitors from regions throughout the United States. National Scenic Byway CMP Point #2 An assessment of the intrinsic qualities and their context (the areas surrounding the intrinsic resources). The Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway offers travelers a significant amount of Historical and Cultural resources; therefore, this CMP is focused mainly on these resource categories. The additional resource categories are not ignored in this CMP; they are however, not at the same level of significance or concentration along the corridor as the Historical and Cultural resources. The resources represented in the following chapter provide direct relationships to the corridor story and are therefore presented in this chapter. A map of the entire corridor with all of the intrinsic resources displayed can be found on Figure 6. Figures 7 through 10 provide detailed maps of the four (4) corridors segments, with the intrinsic resources highlighted. This Intrinsic Resource Assessment is organized in a manner that presents the Primary (or most significant resources) first, followed by the Secondary resources.
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form

    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form Continuation sheet_____________________Item number N-6l88 _____Page 2____ INVENTORY FORM: WHITE CLAY CREEK HUNDRED MULTIPLE RESOURCE AREA E. Justification of Boundaries; The boundaries of the nominated property coincide with the boundaries of the legal parcel. Because the property fronts on Elkton Road, is bounded on the west by Casho Mill Road, and on the north and east by modern residential development, selection of these boundaries best preserves the integrity of this historic resource. F. Significance: The Andrew Kerr House is significant as an early example of a stone dwelling in White Clay Creek Hundred, and is important in understanding the early history and development of the hundred. The Kerrs were one of the first Scotch-Irish families to settle in the western part of White Clay Creek Hundred, and were prominent members of the Head of Christiana Presbyterian Church. Therefore, this property is being nominated to the National Register on the basis of criterion C, as it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; and on the basis of criterion B for its association with persons significant to the local:past. Samuel Kerr, patriarch of the White Clay Creek Hundred family, came to this country from Scotland, and settled in the western portion of the hundred, southwest of the Village of Newark. It was Samuel's son, Andrew, who built this stone house in 1805 authenticated by the initials AK and 1805 in a stone under the right gable said to be the most complete stone house erected in White Clay Creek Hundred at the time.
  • Archaeological Survey of Three Areas of for Myer

    Archaeological Survey of Three Areas of for Myer

    Phase II archaeological evaluation 7.0 REFERENCES CITED American-Rails.com 2012 Delaware Railroads and Railfanning In "The First State". Website: http://www.american- rails.com/delaware-railroads.html. Accessed January 2012. Angier, B. 1974 Field Guide to Edible Wild Plants. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Artusy, R.E. 1976 An Overview of the Proposed Ceramic Sequence in Southern Delaware. Maryland Archeology 12 (2): 1-15. Atkinson, Wilmer, Company 1914 The Farm Journal Illustrated Farm and Business Directory of New Castle County, Delaware, 1914. Wilmer Atkinson Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Auman, C., S.L. Bupp, L. Paonessa, S.M. Moffett, C. Sperling, C. Bowen, D. Knepper, and B.D. Crane 2005 Draft Final Technical Report, Cultural Resources Investigations of the Milton Bypass, Sussex County, Delaware. Prepared by Parsons, Fairfax, Virginia for the Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover, Delaware. Baist, G. William 1893 Atlas of the State of Delaware. G. William Baist, Philadelphia. Baublitz, Richard, John Branigan, John Lawrence, and Paul Schopp 2005 Archaeological Predictive Model U.S. 301 Project Development St. Georges and Pencader Hundreds New Castle County, Delaware. Prepared by A.D. Marble and Company, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania for the Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover, Delaware. Becker, Marshall Joseph 1999 Archaeology at the Printzhof (36DE3), the Only Documented Early 17th Century Swedish Colonial Site in the Delaware Valley. Journal of Middle Atlantic Archaeology 15:77-94. 2011 Delaware. Countries and Their Cultures, North America. Website: http://www.everyculture.com/North-America/Delaware.html. Accessed May 2011. Beers, D.G 1868 Atlas of the State of Delaware. Pomeroy & Beers, Philadelphia. Bendler, Bruce A.
  • Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: Dwellings of the Rural Elite in Central Delaware, 1770-1830 +/-______4

    Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: Dwellings of the Rural Elite in Central Delaware, 1770-1830 +/-______4

    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Hill Island Farm___________________________________ other name/site number: Noxontown Farm, CRS# N-5898__________________ 2. Location street & number: 3379 Dupont Parkway (U.S. Route 13)_________________ not for publication: N/A :ity/town: Odessa, Appoquinimink Hundred_____ vicinity: X state: DE county: New Castle_______ code: 003 zip code: 19709 3. Classification Ownership of Property: private___________________________________ Category of Property: building_________________________________ Mumber of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing 1 4 buildings 0 0 sites 0 0 structures 0 0 objects Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 0__________________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: Dwellings of the Rural Elite in Central Delaware, 1770-1830 +/-_________________________ ___ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets ___ does not meet the National^ Register Criteria. See continuation sheet. // Signature of certifying official Date Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria. X See continuation sheet. ignature of commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau 5.
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form 1

    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service For NPS use only National Register of Historic Places received 4 inventory Nomination Form date entered ?WK See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections_____ 1. Name Towns end Historic District and or common 2. Location street^ number Main Street, South Street, Commerce Street and vicinity-NA. not for publication city, town Towns end i?A- vicinity of state Delaware code 10 county New Castle code 002 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use x district public x occupied agriculture museum building(s) private x unoccupied x commercial park structure x both x work in progress x educational x private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment _x_ religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered x _ yes: unrestricted industrial x transportation NA no military other: 4. Owner of Property name Multiple (see owners list) street & number city, town __ vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. New Castle County Recorder of Deeds street & number City/County Building, 800 French Street city, town Wilmington state Delaware 6. Representation in Existing Surveys__________ title Delaware Cultural Resource Survey has this property been determined eligible? __ yes JgL no date 1981_____CRS #N-10297_____________________ federal _2S_ state __ county _ local Bureau of Archaeology and Historic Preservation depository for survey records pid State House, The Green, P.O. Box 1401 __________________ city, town Dover state Delaware 7.
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service

    United States Department of the Interior National Park Service

    NFS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INTERAGENCY RESOURCES DiVlt REGISTRATION FORM NATIONAL PARK SERVICE This torsi is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Springer-Cranston House________________________ other names/site number CRS # N-12931________________________ 2. Location 1015 Stanton Road __ not for publication n/a Marshallton. Mill Creek Hundred _________ vicinity __ code DE county New Castle____ code 003 zip code 19808 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination __ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property x meets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant __ nationally __ statewide _x__ locally.