DOCSLIB.ORG

Aldborough Hatch Defence Association

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aldborough Hatch Defence Association Aldborough Hatch Defence Association Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030: Pre-Submission Draft Strategic Head of Planning & Building Control London Borough of Redbridge FREEPOST RLSR-JACE HSUG Town Hall High Road ILFORD, Essex IG1 1DD 25th September 2016 Dear Sir, Redbridge Local Plan 2015-2030: Pre-Submission Draft Representations from the Aldborough Hatch Defence Association 1. The representations of the Aldborough Hatch Defence Association relate primarily to Section 3 of the Draft Local Plan (Promoting and Managing Growth) and to Policies LP1 and LP1B (Land South of Billet Road opportunity site 99). The representations also relate to paragraphs 2.2 (Table 2), 3.8.3, 3.8.4, 3.8.5, 6.1.6, 6.1.7, 6.1.9, LP 36 (C). 2. It is considered that the Draft Local Plan is not legally compliant and is not ‘sound’. It does not justify the aspirations in draft policies LP1 and LP1B, relying on erroneous evidential documentation or misinterpretation of such and in many areas the Draft Local Plan is not consistent with National and Regional policies. 3. Redbridge has put forward the Outer North East London Strategic Housing Market Assessment, prepared by Opinion Research Services, as justification for removing land south of Billet Road (Willow Farm) from Green Belt designation. It suggests that since the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment demonstrates that there are insufficient potential sites to meet the housing needs numbers for Redbridge for the period of the Local Plan, and as referred to in the Outer North East London Strategic Housing Market Assessment report, this demonstrates ‘exceptional circumstances’ to justify removing from Green Belt designation various parcels of land around the Borough, including the LP1B lands. However, it is clear from Section 2 of the Draft Local Plan (the Plan) and, in particular Table 2, that the declared Objective of Redbridge is to deliver up to 18,500 new homes over the plan period (although Policy LP2 refers to 16,845 new homes over the period of the Plan) as opposed to the 31,977 new homes over a similar period referred to in paragraph 6.1.6 of the Plan. (It should be noted that Appendix 1 to the Plan does not list all possible opportunity sites and therefore it creates a false base from which to conclude there is insufficient land to meet the Policy LP2 housing needs.) In addition, given the result of June's EU referendum, and the forthcoming Brexit process, can anyone really predict with any certainty the actual housing need? 4. Whilst the housing and population numbers in Section 1 of the Plan are inconsistent and, in at least one instance, mathematically incorrect, these are the numbers which have been used to guide the new housing target in Objective 1 of Table 2. Thus, the only purpose of the Outer North East London Strategic Housing Market Assessment is to try and justify ‘exceptional circumstances’. 5. The Draft Green Belt Review prepared by Wardell Armstrong January 2016, and which Redbridge is using to justify removing the LP1B lands from Green Belt designation, is flawed in many respects. It suggests that the National Planning Policy Framework is different in its approach to Green Belt issues than was the case in Planning Policy Guidance 2 but case law states that the NPPF made no changes to the guidance in PPG2. 6. The Wardell Armstrong Green Belt Review states that the area of Green Belt land south of Billet Road which they have numbered GB14c no longer meet Green Belt purposes and should be de-designated, although the reviews of 2013 & 2015 recommended that GB14c still fulfilled the Green Belt purpose. A view of an aerial photograph of the area shows the connectivity with other Green Belt land of Fairlop Plain. The housing backing onto the GB14c lands was built prior to 1950. Whilst there have been some changes in the locality (not least the development of Hainault House) the character of the area remains much as it was when it was first designated as Green Belt. We have members who have lived in the locality for well over 80 years and who can attest to this. 7. Transport issues - with the development of land south of Billet Road(GB14c) the Council commissioned A High Level Transport Report for the area from Atkins Ltd (their reference 5141547-02). In January 2016 the impact to the local roads was noted as Hainault Road – Moderate Impact, Billet Road – Moderate to Major Impact and B177 Barley Lane Minor to Moderate Impact. From local knowledge and personal observation, we believe the data used has not taken into account current actual peak flow rates into this road system or the potential developments of the other LB1b sites of King George and Goodmayes Hospitals onto the road system. Tailbacks and queues on these roads and nearby highways (Painters Road, Aldborough Road North and Whalebone Lane) are common throughout the day but especially at peak times and during the school runs. We intend to submit up-to-date data to the Inspector in due course. We believe that as the road system is operating at peak times near to its maximum capacity, trying to add another 1000+ vehicle movements will overload the system. We would add that public transport in the area is poor with only direct access to some bus services which are overloaded at peak hours, rail transport is over 2.5 kilometres away at Goodmayes (Network Rail) or Newbury Park for the Central Line which is outside the recommended CIHT Walk Journey Distance and Time Threshold. We consider that cycling on these local roads to be inherently unsafe. 8. Air quality – As well as the High Level Transport Report a separate Air Quality Report was commissioned from Atkins Ltd (their reference 5141547 – December 2015). It is apparent that no actual air quality readings were taken in the vicinity of the Billet Road, Hainault Road and the A12 junction. The report is based totally on modelling, using data that is generalised. We would have thought that some real data monitoring would have been taken from the Little Heath Special Needs School on Hainault Road to give credibility to this report. 9. Biodiversity- Although not on the Borough register of Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) land south of Billet Road (Willow Farm) is still of importance for nature, more so since arable farming ceased. There are a large number of Western European Hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus) found on Willow Farm (a bit of background data: nationally 30 million in the 1950s to around 1.5 million now. They are now listed as an endangered species. If the decline continues, we will lose our last hedgehog by 2020. Declared priority conservation species in 2007.) There are several old ponds that historically were noted for Great Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus) a fully protected species in terms of the Wildlife and Countryside Act. Areas of scrub have developed with associated birdlife, such as Lesser Whitethroat (Sylvia curruca) . In the old arable land Skylarks (Alauda arvensis) breed - a bird of conservation concern. Other farmland birds are also found. Though not officially a SINC (by accident or design) it is listed as one of the Boroughs “Green Corridors” and also part of the “All London Green Grid” administered by the London Mayor. Loss of this site to built development would to the detriment of wildlife conservation in Redbridge. 10. Within the Draft Plan Redbridge has designated various areas around the Borough as Investment and Growth Areas (Section 3 of the Plan refers). One of these is referred to as The Crossrail Corridor Investment and Growth Area. As the accompanying plan (Figure 6) clearly demonstrates, far from being a ‘corridor’ Redbridge has stretched the imagination to create something which looks nothing like a ‘corridor’. It is suggested that this Crossrail Corridor Investment and Growth Area has been drawn in this particular manner in a further attempt to justify taking the GB14c land out of Green Belt designation – but this will not satisfy the tests set out in case law. 11. To take GB14c land out of Green Belt designation will clearly be contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (Green Belt Protection), the London Plan (chapter 7) and the Plan Policies LP34 (Managing and Protecting the Borough’s Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land), LP 36 (Allotments and Local Produce (c) protecting agricultural Land), LP37 (Green Infrastructure and Blue Ribbon Network) and LP39 (Nature Conservation and Biodiversity) 12. Sustainability Issues - Firstly we should define sustainability in the terms of the local plan; the most popular definition of sustainability is that from the Brundtland Report of 1987 which states: Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. This maybe an over simplification of Sustainability but it is the basic reference. We must ask is it Sustainable or sensible to develop farmland that maybe needed to produce food for a growing population in the future? Is it Sustainable to develop a site that is important for its biodiversity? Is it Sustainable to develop a site where transport links are a major issue? Redbridge Council commissioned a Sustainability Appraisal (which it has to do by law) dated July 2016. There are 15 objectives that the local plan is judged against. We will concern ourselves with objective 8 “Maintain and enhance Biodiversity species and habitats” and 9 “Reduce the effect of traffic on the environment”. We also note that added to the plan proposed development sites we have this spurious “Other Greenbelt sites” (par 6.3.7 & 6.3.10).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qryrptcontacts Merge Postal
    qryRptContacts_Merge_Postal_Add PLACES OF WORSHIP IN REDBRIDGE Town County Postcode Al Madina Mosque Barking 2 Victoria Rd Barking Essex IG11 8PY Al-Bayan Welfare Centre 57B Green Lane, Ilford IG1 1XG Ilford Essex IG1 1XG All Saint's Church C/o 38 Broomhill Road Goodmayes Ilford Essex IG3 9SJ. All Saint's Church Woodford Wells The Vicarage 4 Inmans Row Woodford Green Essex IG8 0NH All Saint's Church higwell Row The Rectory Romford Road Chigwell Row Essex IG7 4QD Al-Taqwa Mosque 97 Longbridge Road Ilford Essex IG11 8TB Ashurst Drive Baptist Church Ashurst Drive Gants Hill Essex IG2 6QH Barkingside Congregation of Jehovah's Witnessses Kingdom Hall Manford Way Hainault Essex IG7 4DG Barkingside Methodist Fremantle Road Barkingside Ilford Essex IG6 2AZ Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University 2 Northbrook Road Ilford Essex IG1 3BS Broadmead Baptist Church Chigwell Road Woodford Green Essex IG8 8PD Buckhurst Hill Baptist Church 28 Palmerston Road Buckhurst Hill Essex IG9 5LW Cambridge Park & Hermon Hill Methodist Churches c/o 1 Chester Road Wanstead London E11 2JR Canfield Chapel Canfield Road Woodford Green Essex IG8 8JL Chabad Lubavitch Centre Imperial Chambers 10-17 Woodford Ave Ilford Essex IG2 6JX Chapel of St. Mary & Thomas of Canterbury 48 Ilford Road Ilford Essex IG1 2AT Chigwell & Hainault Synagogue Limes Avenue Limes Farm Estate Chigwell Essex IG7 5NT Church Of Latter Day Saints 46 Ilford Lane Ilford Essex IG1 2JY Church of Our Lady of Assumption (RC) The Presbytery 98 Manford Way Chigwell Essex IG7 4DF City Gates Christian Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Cooper, Mark From: Mayers, Mishka on behalf of reviews Sent: 13 April 2016 10:15 To: Cooper, Mark Subject: FW: Submission for Redbridge Local Government Boundary Changes Attachments: Aldborough Boundary Proposal %281%29.docx From: Cllr John Howard Sent: 12 April 2016 15:35 To: reviews <[email protected]> Cc: Subject: Submission for Redbridge Local Government Boundary Changes Dear Mark, As per the extension granted to us by the boundary review team, please find attached the submission of myself and Cllr Kaur-Thiara (Cllr Streeting MP has submitted his own comments as the MP for Ilford North). Best Wishes John Cllr John Howard Labour Member for Aldborough Ward London Borough of Redbridge Sign up to our Aldborough newsletter Email: LONDON BOROUGH OF REDBRIDGE DISCLAIMER This email contains proprietary confidential information some or all of which may be legally privileged and/or subject to the provisions of privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail; you must not use, disclose, copy, print or disseminate the information contained within this e-mail. Please notify the author immediately by replying to this email. Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states these to be the views of the London Borough of Redbridge. This email has been scanned for all viruses and all reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure that no viruses are present. The London Borough of Redbridge cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop of Barking “For Centuries, the Arts Have Been an Important
    NEWHAM AREA BARKING AND DAGENHAM AREA CONTINUED HAVERING AREA CONTINUED St MARGARET’S BARKING St ANDREW’S, ROMFORD St PAUL’S STRATFORD Stratford Barking Romford Maryland Road, Stratford, E15 IJL The Broadway, North Street, Barking, IG11 8AS Cotleigh Road, Romford, RM7 9AT Artwork: A striking wooden hanging cross, painted and gilded and matching Artwork: St Margaret’s has a rich history of involvement in the visual arts. The Artwork: The East Window (1996) depicts the Transfiguration. There altar frontal (both unattributed) c. 1950’s. high altar was produced by Arts and Crafts architect and Morris & Co. designer, is a an icon by the iconographer John Coleman (2006), in the nave. Philip Webb. Morris & Co. designer , George Jack contributed a window, carved Opening Times: Sunday services: 11.00am Opening by prior arrangement at other Opening Times: Sunday, 10.30am. See website for full details. Access at other times times. Contact: Revd Kelvin Woolmer T: 020 8279 4053 or Frank Simons 0208 923 statuetes, and a painted font cover to a early Twentieth century reordering. A by prior arrangement with the Rector or Parish Secretary Contact: Rector, Fr John- 1453 E: [email protected] W: www.achurchnearyou.com/stratford-st-paul painting by Alan Stewart, entitled Early in the Morning (2005 – detail shown), Francis Friendship T: 01708 741256 or Parish Secretary 01708737791 shows a black Christ cooking breakfast for his disciples depicted as being E: [email protected] W: www. standrewromford.org.uk St MICHAEL & ALL ANGELS, MANOR PARK of every ethnic origin to reflect the diverse worshipping community at St Manor Pk EDWARD THE CONFESSOR, ROMFORD Romford Rd/Toronto Ave, Manor Park, E12 5JF Margaret’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement Regarding Wardell Armstrong Report Green Belt Review Addendum – LBR 2441 – Feb 2017
    Save Oakfield Society R01088/01-05 Statement Regarding Wardell Armstrong Report Green Belt Review Addendum – LBR 2441 – Feb 2017 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 My name is Howard Berlin. I practice under the name of Howard Berlin Chartered Surveyors. I give my professional qualifications as a Member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors. I am a RICS Registered Valuer. I am also a Member of the Institute of Revenues Rating and Valuation (Honours) and a Member of the Chartered Institute of Building. 1.2 I specialise primarily in valuation but part of my work involves planning issues. 1.3 I was instructed on behalf of Save Oakfield Society on the 22nd July 2016 to prepare a Green Belt Review into the London Borough of Redbridge plans to declassify Oakfield Playing Fields from the Green Belt (Metropolitan Open Land). Wardell Armstrong have prepared a new report (February 2017) and I make the following points by way of rebuttal. 2.0 PPG2 / NPPF ASSESSMENT 2.1 It should be noted that the original Green Belt review carried out in 2010 (Stage 3 PPG2 Assessment dated May 2010, (LBR 2.4.1.a) (4.1.1 Page 9) stated that both Hainault Fields (GB13) and Fairlop Plain (GB14) scored 12 points. This is the correct methodology in advising if green belt land should be declassified. It should be noted that nothing has happened in the location to alter the score. Neither has there been any change to this in NPPF Policy. There is no evidence of any material change from Wardell Armstrong (WA) or London Borough of Redbridge It should be further noted that 12 points is the highest score for any Green Belt land in London Borough of Redbridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation on Possible Changes to Bus Route 462
    Consultation on possible changes to bus route 462 Consultation Report October 2015 1 2 Consultation on possible changes to bus route 462 Consultation Report 3 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 2 The consultation ........................................................................................................................ 3 3 Responses from members of the public ................................................................................. 4 4 Responses from statutory bodies and other stakeholders ................................................... 7 Appendix A - Copy of the consultation letter, maps, and CRM email .......................................... 8 Appendix B – Letter distribution area ........................................................................................... 15 Appendix C – List of stakeholders consulted .............................................................................. 16 1 1 Introduction We recently consulted stakeholders and the public about a proposal to alter route 462 in the Fairlop area. The consultation took place between 6 February and 20 March 2015. Following a request from the London Borough of Redbridge we reviewed the possibility of providing a bus service along Forest Road in Fairlop, which is not served by a bus route at present. As a consequence we proposed to change route 462 to meet this request, which would bring some local residents closer to the
    [Show full text]
  • Freehold for Sale
    FREEHOLD FOR SALE POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR A MIXED-USE SCHEME OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES (B1 & B8 USE CLASSES). RAINHAM R O AD NOR TH PLANNING ADVICE HAS BEEN SOUGHT FROM THE LOCAL AUTHORITY FOR A MIXED-USE, RESIDENTIAL-LED DEVELOPMENT TO INCLUDE 455 RESIDENTIAL UNITS AND COMMERCIAL SPACE SITUATED ON A PROMINENT CORNER AT THE JUNCTION OF RAINHAM ROAD SOUTH, OXLOW LANE OXLOW LANE AND DAGENHAM ROAD RAINHAM R CURRENTLY USED AS A DISTRIBUTION CENTRE REXEL AND TRADE COUNTER WITH ASSOCIATED WAREHOUSING AND OFFICES O AD S OUTH SITE COMPRISES 6.13 ACRES (2.48 HECTARES) FREEHOLD FOR SALE WITH VACANT POSSESSION UNCONDITIONAL OFFERS INVITED W AL TZ R O MANCHESTER WAY AD ATE USTRIAL EST STERLING IND Site plan for indicative purposes only and not to scale. 2 REXEL D A O R F H R C I D R A U Y H H C I L D L L D O A RO CHIGWELL NE WOODFORD WELLS OUR A AMB Hainault Forest A A L RODING VALLEY H A L A L AD I I NEW RO N H A A U E E L A T R E T R N CHINGFORD HATCH C O E A H L IN L A G A G D GRANGE HILL L R F N L O K A A R S D R H H O A R L O L A L N M R E F O N O A E R D D E R A R O G A D W D WOODFORD A R A AD A L RO T O OR H F AN A D M M O GRANGE HILL S D T A CHASE CROSS O O HIGHAMS PARK O W W R D L HAINAULT A A L E V HIGHAMS PARK O E R W N G H I U WOODFORD H G E I C H N O R TH C F I E R HAINAULT A C N D U A WALTHAM C L A D O HALE END E B R R A R R OA WOODFORD BRIDGE P S O O DM I S R E E A A O D C D A R ­ R RO C A E E D E S R A FOREST T CH S COLLIER ROW O ROMFORD ROAD E WOODFORD GREEN A H REPTON PARK D D C
    [Show full text]
  • Brett Tarmac Limited Fairlop Tar/Fa/Dm/5599/01/Nts 1
    BRETT TARMAC LIMITED FAIRLOP An application for an Environmental Permit to authorise the deposition of waste on land as a recovery activity for the restoration of Phases E and F to agriculture and nature restoration at Fairlop Quarry, Romford, London Borough of Redbridge Non-technical Summary 1.1 MJCA is commissioned by Brett Tarmac Limited (BTL) to prepare an application for a bespoke Environmental Permit for the deposition of waste on land as a recovery activity in order to restore Phase E and Phase F to agriculture and nature conservation at Fairlop Quarry, Hainault Road, Little Heath, Romford in the London Borough of Redbridge. The Environment Agency (EA) have confirmed that the activity comprises recovery. 1.2 Phases E and F form part of the wider Fairlop Quarry complex of mineral workings which is located approximately 4km north east of Ilford. Several of the other phases of mineral workings at Fairlop Quarry have been restored or are in the process of being restored including Phase D which is the subject of Environmental Permit number EPR/BB3833AL operated by Brett Tarmac Limited for the deposit of waste on land as a recovery activity. Phase D has largely been restored to agriculture and nature conservation habitats although parts of the Phase will remain in use as water management facility. The locations of Phase E and Phase F are shown on Figure NTS 1. Phase E is centred approximately on National Grid Reference (NGR) TQ 45268 89397 and covers an area of approximately 14ha. Phase F is centred approximately on NGR TQ 46503 90402 and covers an area of approximately 2ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Below Are Our Reports on Recent Events and Instruments That We Have Visited
    Below are our reports on recent events and instruments that we have visited: Musical Extravaganza - a fundraising concert at All Saints Woodford Wells on 18/03/2017 by David Sutton A visit to St Mary of Eton Hackney Wick on 23/04/2016 by David Sutton A visit to St Luke’s Hillyfields Enfield on 20/02/2016 by David Sutton Visit to the Temple Church London on 03/10/2015 by David Sutton Visit to St Mary’s Standon on 05/09/2015 by David Sutton Visit to the Royal Academy of Music on 04/07/2015 by David Sutton Visit to Marlow on 13/06/2015 by David Sutton Visit to the City of London School on 02/03/2015 by David Sutton Visit to Chelsea Hospital on 17/01/2015 by David Sutton An evening with our President, Catherine Ennis, at St Mary-Le-Bow on 12/11/2014 by David Sutton A visit to Notting Hill Gate and Bayswater on 11/10/2014 by David Sutton Visit to Holy Innocents High Beech on 03/08/2014 by David Sutton Organ Symposium, Royal Festival Hall on 02/08/2014 by Claire Randall Visit to St George’s Metropolitan Cathedral Southwark on 05/07/2014 by David Sutton Visit to St John’s Stratford Broadway on 12/04/2014 by David Sutton Visit to the Union Chapel Islington on 11/01/2014 by David Sutton Visit to the Mansion House on 12/10/2013 by David Sutton 'Royal Connections' - Visits to Aldborough Hatch and Goodmayes on 28/09/2013 by David Sutton Visit to Bury St Edmunds on 17/08/2013 by David Sutton Visit to St John’s Seven Kings on 23/07/2013 by David Sutton Visit to Loughton Methodist Church on 18/03/2013 by David Sutton Peter Collins Day – a visit to two
    [Show full text]
  • Redbridge Decentralised Energy Masterplanning Study
    Intended for London Borough of Redbridge Document type Report Date 18th December 2012 London Borough of Redbridge Decentralised Energy Masterplanning Study LONDON BOROUGH OF REDBRIDGE DECENTRALISED ENERGY MASTERPLANNING STUDY LONDON BOROUGH OF REDBRIDGE Revision Final Version 6 Date 2012/12/18 Made by Anthony Riddle/ Olof Jangsten Checked by Soren Vesterby Knudsen Approved by Crispin Matson Description London Borough of Redbridge Decentralised Energy Masterplanning Study Ref Report 12199430275-141-001 Ramboll Hannemanns Allé 53 DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark T +45 5161 1000 F +45 5161 1001 www.ramboll.com Ramboll Energy 60 Newman Street London W1T 3DA T +44 (0)20 7631 5291 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. Introduction 7 1.1 Introduction to Decentralised Energy 7 1.2 Background and Policy Context 8 1.3 Report Aims 9 1.4 Outline Methodology 10 1.5 Layout of Report 11 2. Ilford Town Centre Heat Network Opportunity 13 2.1 Summary of Opportunity 13 2.2 Energy Supply Opportunity 22 2.3 Phasing Strategy and Implementation Plan 25 2.4 Economic Appraisal 25 2.5 Sensitivity Analysis 28 2.6 Implication for Project Procurement 30 2.7 Heat Supply Contribution 32 2.8 Carbon Appraisal 32 2.9 Route Identification and Risk Appraisal 32 2.10 Summary 34 3. Crossrail Corridor 36 3.1 Summary of Opportunity 36 3.2 Identified Network Opportunity 36 3.3 Energy Supply Opportunity 43 3.4 Phasing Strategy and Implementation Plan 44 3.5 Economic Appraisal 44 3.6 Sensitivity Analysis 45 3.7 Implication for Project Procurement 46 3.8 Heat Supply Contribution 46 3.9 Carbon Appraisal 46 3.10 Route Identification and Risk Appraisal 47 3.11 Summary 47 4.
    [Show full text]
  • R01098 Aldborough Hatch Defence Association
    Chris Gannaway, for Aldborough Hatch Defence Association R01098/04 Policy LP22 relating to Billet Road development 11/05/2017 Please find attached three transport survey documents relating to our objection to the development of land at Billet Road. The LONG TERM REPORT.pdf – sets the scene and shows all the data logged by our contractor DCA Moisyst Ltd using MetroCount 5900' traffic loggers which are state of the art traffic loggers. The TRAFFIC FLOW COMPARISON PAINTERS ROAD ALDBOROUGH ROAD NORTH.pdf – Show the increase of traffic that has taken place over a short period within Aldborough Hatch that can directly be attributed to the traffic conditions on Hainault Road into Little Heath Junction (including Billet Rd flow) of the A12 between April and September 2016 the September data shows a substantial increase in vehicle numbers flowing into the Aldborough Road North junction with the A12. The comparison report ACTUAL.pdf – shows photographs and timings of the actual conditions of traffic at the round-a-bout at the junction of Hainault Rd and Billet Road, it also shows the queuing points up to 500 metres along both roads, a copy of Crash Map for the area 2011 to 2015(the latest date at time of report) showing a significant number of reported crashes note many minor accidents go unreported. It also notes the Greater London Authority objection to a smaller development at Five Oaks (425 houses) we believe that if the Billet Road Development of 800 dwellings + primary school got the go ahead from LB Redbridge the Mayor of London would call it in.
    [Show full text]
  • Chadwej.Jl Heath. [Northern
    42 CHADWEJ.JL HEATH. [NORTHERN Chadwell Heath-continue~!. Dodwell Eber John, butcher Saunders Charles, 3 Hainault villas Hartridge Daniel, coffee rooms Fordham William, dairyman tlavill Alfred, Chigwell hall Higgs Thomas, blacksmith French John,farm bailiff to Mrs.Burton, Savill Misses, Ten l\Iile villa Hills George, greengrocer, Whitehouse Blue House farm Shorter John, Mill brook, Grange hill HollidayJoseph Frdk. builder,Hope villa Gunary Geo. mrkt.gardnr.Primrose frm ShorterMiss,Lttl. Haylands, ChigwellRd JewellAlexanderThos.shpkpr.Station rd Hancock John, farmer, Seven Kings Simkins W. A. M.A. Lassistantmastor], King Edward, carman, Alpha cottage Holliday Elgar, shopkeeper Grammar school King Robert, carman, Ernest cottage Humphrey Joseph, shopkpr. Little hth Suart Alfred Pett1ts, Pudding lane KingRobert,jun.hay& straw dlr.High rd King Henrietta (Mrs.), shopkeeper Swallow Hev. Hichard Dawson I>I.A. Kirby Charles, dairyman Knight William, carter, Little heath [head master], Grammar school Little John, jobber Lee Robert John, carpenter & grocer Tallett Saml. Kings, 15 Hainault villas Little 1\Irs. cowkeeper :Machell Fras. L. beer ret. Little heath Taylor Victor, The Shaws, Gravel lane Martin John, farm bailiff for Thomas ~1assey Alfred, farmer, Little heath Thomas James Harrison, Haylands May, esq. Valence Mead Clement, farmer, Downhall Walby George, llroomhill May Frrderick, hairdresser, Station rd Miriam Jane Matilda C~hs.), beer retlr Webb John l~acker, 7 Hainault villas Moss Archer & Son, millers (wind & Porter Wm. shopkeeper, Padnall corner White Alexander F. Sandon lodge steam) & corn dealers & coal mer­ Pye Chas. Wm. hay&straw dlr. Little hth COMMERCIAL. chants, The Mills Rodgers Mrs. dress maker, Railway ter Archbishop Harsnett'sGrammar School Parrish Albert, hay & straw dealer, :::laggers George, Crooked Billet P.H.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Aldborough Walk
    9. WHITE’S FARMHOUSE A typical mid 19th century farmhouse with ornate conservatory. The House is of a type once very common,common, but now disappearing fast. Ilford War Memorial Gardens 11. ILFORD WAR MEMORIAL, EASTERN AVENUE This formed part of the memorial to the Military White’s Farmhouse dead of the 1914-1918 War. The rotunda and entrance hall has names of the dead inscribed on 10. NEWBURY PARK STATION BUS SHELTER stone tablets around the inner walls. Attached to the rear entrance was the access to the Designed in 1937 by Oliver Hill . The Shelter was now demolished children’s ward of the Ilford built in 1947-48, in use from 1949, and won a Emergency Hospital (later rebuilt as King George Aldborough Gazebo Festival of Britain Architectural Merit Award in Hospital), the whole complex was opened on 25 1951. A part of the pre-War Central Line extension January 1927. The architects were C.J. Dawson & programme. Son and Allardyce . This is only a selection of the interesting things to be seen on this walk. Why not increase your enjoyment of the walk still further by visiting Redbridge Local Studies & Archives for more information about the route. All photos and illustrations are courtesy of: Local Studies and Archives 2nd Floor, Central Library Clements Road IG1 1EA Tel: 020 8708 2417 Email: [email protected] ALDBOROUGH WALK Newbury Park Station bus shelter DOORSTEP YOUR ON HISTORY THE DISCOVER London Borough of Redbridge, PO BOX No.2, Town Hall, 128-142 High Road, Ilford, IG1 1DD ALDBOROUGH WALK MAP CRAVE FREM ANT LE R OAD N B A G RO N DS PAINTERS ROAD G D N S T A RS NNE L A N E 4 S T Barkingside 3 ATI 2 O N 1 R D A H 7 T 1 R O 6 Start N D D A 2 A O O R R 5 H G 3 U K O O R 8 O O E B R OAKS LANE N 2 D B 1 L A L N A L E A Y A S R S W N C 9 O E E R V O U I O R O D N H E A D V K D S R A T L D S A R E R N N M R N U E E AR A H F T L S S S A N A A E M Newbury Y Y R Park E L ER P R 10 A 11 B E A S T E Finish R N A V E 2 N U 1 E A Continue to The Dick Turpin Pub 1.
    [Show full text]