DOCSLIB.ORG

LIST of DEFENSE WITNESSES Name of Witness Date Testified 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LIST of DEFENSE WITNESSES Name of Witness Date Testified 1 LIST OF DEFENSE WITNESSE S Name of witness Date testified 1. Schilf, Dr . Alfred 19 Jan 1948 2. Jones, Lt . Bud . 19 Jan 1948 3. Wecker, Dr . 19 Jan 1948 4. Geissler, Dr . 20 Jan 1948 5. Cuntz, Heinrich 30 March 1948 6. Wilmowski, Count Tito von 31 March 1948 7. Schnadel, Prof . Dr . Georg 1 April 1948 8. Schmidt, Dr . Paul Otto 2 April 1948 9. Flick, Friedrich 2 April 1948 10. Kastl, Ludwig 2o April 1948 11. Pleiger, Paul 21 April 1948 12. Rohland, Paul Walter 22 April 1948 13. Rinne, Kurt 26 April 1948 14. Hanssen, Paul 26 April 1948 15.Ufer, Dr . Georg 26 April 1948 16. Schroeder, Johannes 27 April 1948 17. Biegl, Kurt 29 April 1948 18. Doernenburg, Gustav 29 April 1948 19. Hermann, Dr . Hans 30 April 1948 20. Thiess, Dr . Erich 30 April 1948 21. Weigelt, Dr . Horst 1 May 1948 22. Eilebrecht-Kenema, Erich 1 May 1948 23. Hardach, Dr . Fritz Wilhelm 3 May 1948 24. Sossin-Arbatoff, Constantin 5 May 1948 25. Sieber, Karl 7 May 1948 26.Milch, Erhard (also Commission H) 10 May 1948 27. Borchmeyer, Dr . Josef 10 May 1948 28. Steffler, Dr . Wilhelm (Commission H .) 7 May 1948 29. Peretti, Eduard (Commission Hearing) 8 May 1948 30. Rauch, Cristian (Commission Hearing) 8 May 1948 Name of Witness Date testified 31. Westhoff, Adolph 11 May 194 8 32. Eickmeier, Hans 12 May 1948 33. Kraus, Willi (also Comm .Hearing) 12 May 1948 34 . Marquardt, Gerhardt 12 May 1948 35. Trockel, Adolf (Also Comm.Hearing) 13 Way 1948 36. Herrmann, Maria (Commission Hearing) 12 May 1948 37. Baltus, Paul (Commission Hearing) 12 May 1948 38. Hamacher, Hermann (Commission Hearing) 12 May 1948 39. Kerkmann, Hans (Commission Hearing) 12 May 1949 40 . Schaeffer, Werner 13 May 1948 41. Koehler, Wilhelm (also Comm .Hearing) 13 May 1948 Nicolaides,42. Nico (also Comm .Hearing) 13 May 1948 43. Niekamper, Theodor (Commission Hearing)13 May 1948 44. Hannulek, Walter (Commission Hearing) 13 1948 45. Hupe, Karl (Commissin Hearing) 13 &. 14 May 1948 46. Sponheuer, Alfried (Commission Hearing) 14 May 1948 47. Schulz, Rudolf (Commission Hearing) 14 May 1948 48. Beckmann, Josef (Commission Hearing) 15 May 194 8 49. Mueller, Friedrich (Commission Hearing) 15 May 1948 50 . Fuehrer, Fritz 117 1948 51. Topat, Will i 18 May 1948 52.Keul, Max (also Commission Hearing ) 18 May 1948 53. Leuthgen, Ludwig 19 May 1948 54. Lorenz, Josef 19 May 1948 55. Rohlfs, Dr . Theo (Commission Hearing) 19 May 1948 56. Hintz, Helmut (Commission Hearing) 20 May 1948 57.Mette, Adolf (Commission Hearing) 20 May 1948 58. Blume, Erich (Commission Hearing) 20 May 1948 59. Kirmse, Hermann (Commission Hearing) 20 May 1948 60 . Schiebe, Ernst (Commission Hearing) 20 May 1948 61. May, Wilhelm (Commission Hearing) 20 & 21 May 1948 62. Kalen, Hans (Commission Hearing) 21 May 1948 Name of Witness Date testifie d 63. Dominik, Henrietta (Commission Hearing) 21 May 194 8 64. Huemmerich, Heinrich (Commission Hearing) 21 & 22 May 1948 65. Dolhaine, Johannes (Commission Hearing) 21 May 1948 66. Steenbock, Hans 24 May 1948 67. Rosenbaum, Kurt (Commission Hearing) 24 May 194 8 68. Schildrath, Arthur (Commission Hearing) 24 May 194 8 69. Fugmann, Bruno (Commission Hearing) 24 May 194 8 70. Spinnrath, Mathias (Commission Hearing) 24 May 1948 71. Hahn, Walter (Also Commission Hearing) 25 May 1948 72. Nedlemann, Dr . Ernst 25 May 1948 73.Werthmann, Fritz 26 May 1948 74. Schwarzbach, Fritz (Commission Hearing) 25 May 1948 75. Schneiders, Heinz (Commission Hearing) 25 May 1948 76. Kirschbaum, Marie (Commission Hearing) 25 May 1948 77. Beck, Eugen (Commission Hearing) 25 t 26 May 1948 78. Braun, Theodor (Commission Hearing) 26 May 1948 79. Weissenborn, Kurt (Commission Hearing) 26 May 1948 80. Schieber, Walter 27 May 1948 81. Kaldemorgan, Maria (Comets ion Hearing) 22 May 1948 82. Nohles, Peter (Commission Hearing) 22 & 24 May 1948 83. Neumann, Walter (Commission Hearing) 24 May 1948 84. Heinrichsbauer, August (Comm.Hearing) 24 May 1948 85. Geulen, Caroline (Commission Hearing) 25 May 1948 86. Engisser, Ludwig (Commission Hearing) 25 May 1948 87. Bruckmann, Heinrich (Commission Hearing) 25 May 1948 88. 'Wiehle, Dr . Gerhard (also Comm.Hearing) 26 May 1948 89. Holbrecker, Hermann H . (Comm .Hearing) 27 May 1948 90. Stahmer, Franz (Commission Hearing) 27 May 1948 91. Brockmann, Wilhelm (Commission Hearing) 27 May 194 8 92. Beninghoven, Wilhelm (Commission Hearing) 27 May 1948 93. Lux, Hermann (Commission Hearing) 27 & 28 May 1948 94. von Buelow, Friedrich, defendant 28 May 1948 95. Lehmann, Dr . Heinrich, defendant 28 May 1948 96. Tenhuenfeld, Lorenz (Commission Hearing) 28 May 1948 Name of Witness Date testifie d 97. Schulten, Robert (Commission . Hearing) 28 May 1948 98. Drinnenberg, Josef (Commission Hearing) 28 May 1948 99. Dworack, Wilhelm (Commission Hearing) 29 May 1948 100. Kramer, Paul (Commission Hearing) 29 May 1948 101. Surmond, Hermann (Commission Hearing) 29 May 1948 102. Beduhn, Ranz (Commission Hearing) 29 may 1948 103. Willberg, Helmut (Commission Hearing) 29 May 1948 104. Krupp von Bohlen, Alfried, defendant 3 June 1948 105. ihn, Max, defendant 3 June 1948 106. Frost, Herald (Commission Hearing) 28 May 1948 107. Lorson, Horde (Commission Hearing) 28 May 1948 108. Brock, Willi (Commission Hearing) 28 May 1948 109. Godde, Wilhelm (Commission Hearing) 31 may 1948 110. Lehmbuehler, Eugen (Comm . Hearing) 31 May 1948 111. Doering, Anna (Commission Hearing) 31 May 1948 112. Altmann, (Commission Hearing) 1 June 1948 113. Alken, Christel (Commission Hearing) 1 June 1948 114. Pfeiffer, (Commission Hearing) 1 June 1948 115.Podehl, Gustav (Commission Hearing) 2 June 1948 116. Mueller, Johann (Commission Hearing) 2 June 1948 117. Wiecke, Karl (Commission Hearing) 2 June 1948 118. Janssen, Dr . defendant 3 June 1948 119. Korschan, Heinrich, defendant 3 June 1948 120. Kupke, Hans, defendant 4 June 1948 121. Franke, Eberhard (Commission Hearing) 3 June 1948 122. Koch, Richard (Commission Hearing) 3 June 1948 123. Seekatz, Karl (Commission Hearing) 3 June 1948 124. Frisch, Erich (Commission Hearing) 3 June 1948 125. Huelsewiesche (Commission Hearing) 4 June 1948 126. Endrulaht (Commission Hearing) 4 June 1948 127. von Nordheim (Commission Hearing) 4 & 5 June 194 8 128. Buschmann (Commission Hearing) 5 June 1948 Name of Witness Date testified 129. Polikiet (Commission Hearing) 5 June 1948 130. Bosteck (Commission Hearing) 5 June 1948 131. Kraus, Willi (Commission Hearing) 29 May 1948 132. Godde, Wilhelm (Comm . Hearing) 31 May 1948 133. Lehmbuehler, Eugen (Comm . Hearing) 31 May 1948 134. Doering, Anna (Commission Hearing) 31 May 1948 135. Sommerer, Karl (Commission Hearing) 3 June 1948 136. Leyers, Hans (Commission Hearing) 4 June 1948 137. Schulz, Rudolf (Commission Tearing) 4 & 5 June 1948 138. Hennig, Max (Commission Hearing) 5 June 194 8 139. Leonhard, Emil (Commiss . Hearing) 5 June 1948 140. Lauffer, Eugen (Commission Hearing) 5 June 1948 141. Schomberg, Rudolf (Comm . Hearing) 5 June 1948 142. Gross, August (Commission Hearing) 5 June 1948 143. Schwager, Herbert (Comm. Hearing) 5 June 1948 144. Fahrenholt, Miss (Comm.Hearing) 7 June 1948 145. Fries, Dietrich (Comm. Hearing) 7 June 1948 146. Gross (Commission Hearing) 7 June 1948 147. Brombach, Hermann (Commission Hearing) 7 June 194 8 148. Reif, Wilhelm (Commission Hearing) 8 June 1948 149. Scheider, Lorenz (Commission Hearing) 10 June 1948 Koernert,150. Georg (Commission Hearing) 10 June 194 8 151. Koettgen, Werner (Commission Hearing) 10 & 11 June 194 8 152. Verfuehrt, Elizabeth (Comm . Hearing) 11 June 1948 153. Hendel, Dr . (Commission Hearing) 11 June 1948 154. Lange, Wilhelm (Commission Hearing) 11 & 12 June 194 8 155. Weber, Dr. Rudolf (Comm . Hearing) 12 June 1948 156. Lorenz, Josef (Commission Hearing) 12 June 1948 157. Richter, Lotte (Commission Healing) 12 June 1948 158. Hollmann (Commission Hearing) 12 June 1948 159. Hanko ((Commission Hearing) 12 June 1948.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Traffic Volume Trenos
    s E U I Y PUBLIC ROADS ADMfNlSTRATION FEDERAL WORKS AGENCY l NFORMAT l ONAL MEMORANDUM DATE: MAY 31, 1946 SUBJECT: TRAFFIC VOLUME TRENOS Traffic during April 1940 continued to show approriaately the iy""". same recovery from wartime levels as in the previous three months. ii On the basis of preliminary reports, total travel on rural roads during April 1948 was 51.3 percent above that of April 1946 and only 3.6 percent below that of April 1941. Traffic on main hieh- ways was 1.4 percent below, and that on local roads was 2.3 percent below the 2941 figures. Rural. traffic inthe two western regionswas20.8 percent sbwd p corresponding 1941 counts, while that in the central regions wag 4.2 percent below, and that in the eastern regions was 9.8 percent below the 1941 levels. In comparison with 1945 figures, traffic in the western regions increased 69.2 percent, that in the central regions 47.7 percent, and that in the eastern regions 51.0 percent. Comp+arisons of city traffic .in April 1946 with corresponding traffic in April 1945 are as follows: p 6 stations in Chicago, ILlinois f37.8 percent 3 stations in Detroit, Michigan f23.9 percent 1 stationinS.anta Fe, New Mexico t38.9 percent 5 stations in St, Louis, Missouri $37.9 percent 13 stations in Washington, D. C. t37.4 percent ti. S. FAIRBANK,DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, Puscrc ROADS ADMINISTRATION Attachments Pl P-3 94 0 Q I a Obr Type sf highway and St ate and St ate STATE BIGEIWAYS West Virginia Wisconsin Cann e e t-.icu t Connecticut Massacku setts I Mississippi North Dakota North Carolina North Dakota Wkade Island South Carolina Ssuth Dakota 4 C&RPRAL RPGIOAS a11 States except Delmrare, Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest Lyle Saunders
    New Mexico Quarterly Volume 18 | Issue 3 Article 18 1948 A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest Lyle Saunders Frank L. Baird Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq Recommended Citation Saunders, Lyle and Frank L. Baird. "A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest." New Mexico Quarterly 18, 3 (1948). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmq/vol18/iss3/18 This Contents is brought to you for free and open access by the University of New Mexico Press at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Quarterly by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Saunders and Baird: A Guide to the Literature of the Southwest " A G-UIDE TO THE LITERATURE OF THE SOUTHWEST Lyle Saunders and Frank L. Baird . 26 HIS BIBLIOGRAPHY, a service of the Unive{si~y of New M~xico's Research Bureau on Latin America and Cultural Relations in the Southwest,T attempts to list, with such thoroughness as time and resources permit, current materials dealing with the Southwest. The Southwest, as here defined, includes all of New Mexico and Arizona and part~ of­ TeXas, Utah, Oklahoma, Colorado, Nevada, and California. The symbol (F) designates fiction;_ 0) is used to indicate0 materials on the juvenile level. Included in this issue are mainly those titles which were published or came to our attention between..April 1 and June 1, 1948. In order to conserve space and-avoid needless repetition, general, recurring items (indicated in the. Spring, 1948, issue by a star) will be listed only once a year in the Spring numbers of the NEW MEXICO QUARTERLY REVIEW.
    [Show full text]
  • When Are Foreign Volunteers Useful? Israel's Transnational Soldiers in the War of 1948 Re-Examined
    This is a repository copy of When are Foreign Volunteers Useful? Israel's Transnational Soldiers in the War of 1948 Re-examined. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/79021/ Version: WRRO with coversheet Article: Arielli, N (2014) When are Foreign Volunteers Useful? Israel's Transnational Soldiers in the War of 1948 Re-examined. Journal of Military History, 78 (2). pp. 703-724. ISSN 0899- 3718 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ promoting access to White Rose research papers Universities of Leeds, Sheffield and York http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/79021/ Paper: Arielli, N (2014) When are foreign volunteers useful? Israel's transnational soldiers in the war of 1948 re-examined. Journal of Military History, 78 (2). 703 - 724. White Rose Research Online [email protected] When are Foreign Volunteers Useful? Israel’s Transnational Soldiers in the War of 1948 Re-examined Nir Arielli Abstract The literature on foreign, or “transnational,” war volunteering has fo- cused overwhelmingly on the motivations and experiences of the vol- unteers.
    [Show full text]
  • Budget May 1948
    180 -•~- • RESOLUTION NO. 35. A Rl!SOLUTION RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF AN ESTIMATE •..' OF EXPENSES· FOR ALL PURPOSES FOR THE VILLAGE OF KUNA FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING THE 1ST DAY OF MAY 1948, AND ENDING THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL 194~. ·. BE IT Rl!SOLVED RESOLVED BY THE CHAIRMAN AND BOARD OF TRUSTEE> TRUSTEm OF THE VILLAGE OF KUNA: : Section l. 1. That the following fOllowing classified estimate of the probable amount of money necessary to be raised for all purposes in the Village of Kuna, for the fiscal year beginning the let 1st ,day ·day of May 1948, and ending the 30th day of April 1949, be pUblishedpublished for two sucoeeeive successive weekly issues in the Kuna Herald, a wee~cly newspaper pUbl-iahedpubl·iehed i•n i·n the Village of Kuna. SectionSect ion 2. That a statement of the entire revenue of the VillageVi l_lage for the previous fiscal year is as follows: j ·.General General Receipta-----------------------8126.70 Rec eipts------------ 8126. 70 er(V,V~ ·Tax-Tax receipts---------------------------3324.38 receipts----------------- 3324.38 ·.Balance Balance on hand------------------------3765.65 hand---------------- 3765.65 S~ction 3. That the probable amount of money necessary for all purposes for the fiscal year ending April 30th 1948, is as ffOllows: ollowa: ·Salar1es--------- ~ 6000.00 ·L1ghts-~salaries---------------~-------~----~-~6000.00 ~ ~ ~~ 800.00 ·Lights---------~----------~~-----~----- -Building Improvements-- 800.00300.00 • ·Building-Waterworks------- Improvements------------------2000.00300.00 ·Streets-·Waterworks---------------------------••2000.00800.00
    [Show full text]
  • International Law Documents : 1948-49
    International Law Studies – Volume 46 International Law Documents U.S. Naval War College (Editor) The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the U.S. government, the U.S. Department of the Navy or the Naval War College. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Page 1. Charter of the Organization of American States, Bogota, 30 April 1948 .. .. .. ............. .. ..... .... ......... ..... 2. American Treaty of Pacific Settlement: "Pact of Bogota," Bogota, 30 April 1948. 26 3. Treaty of Economic, Social and Cultural Collaboration and Col- lective Self-Defense (United Kingdom, Belgium, France, Luxem- bourg, and the Netherlands), Brussels, 17 March 1948.... .. 46 4. North Atlantic Defense Treaty, Washington, 4 April1949...... .. 52 5. Revised General Act for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes, Lake Success, 28 April 1949... 56 6. Statute of the Council of Europe, London, 5 May 1949.. 57 II. TRIALS OF WAR CRIMINALS 1. International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Indictment No. 1, 29 April 1946 (excerpts). 71 2. International Military Tribunal for the Far East, Judgment, 4-12 November 1948 (excerpts). 76 3. Tabulation of the Tokyo Sentences of Individual Defendants. 107 III. RIGHTS CLAIMED BY LITTORAL STATES IN ADJACENT SEAS 1. The Corfu Channel Case (Merits), International Court of Justice, Judgment of 9 April 1949.. 108 2. United States Laws and Regulations.......................... 156 (a) Harbors Closed to Foreign Vessels..................... 156 (b) DefensiveSeaAreas ............................. .. .. 157 (c) Maritime Control Areas.............................. 169 (d) Customs Enforcement Areas........................ 176 (e) Laws concerning Pollution of Navigable Waters....... .. 180 3. Claims to the Continental Shelf. • 182 (a) United States of America: Presidential Proclamation, 28 September 1945.
    [Show full text]
  • PALESTINE: TERMINATION of the MANDATE 15 May 1948
    PALESTINE: TERMINATION OF THE MANDATE 15 May 1948 [Statement prepared for public information by the Colonial Office and Foreign Office, His Majesty's Stationery Office] His Majesty's Government in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland will cease to be responsible for the administration of Palestine from midnight on 14th May, 1948. The ending of thirty years of British rule in Palestine, begun when General Allenby's troop occupied that country towards the close of the first world war, provides a fitting occasion for a brief review of its history and of the policy pursued by His Majesty's Government. I. The Origin and Nature of the British Mandate for Palestine The Mandate for Palestine was assigned to His Majesty by the Supreme Council of the Allied Powers in 1920, was approved by the League of Nations in 1922 and took effect in 1923, when the Treaty of Lausanne formally ended the war between the Allied Powers and the Ottoman Empire, in which Palestine had previously been included. To implement this Mandate, His Majesty's Government set up in Palestine an Administration comprising a British High Commissioner, appointed by and responsible to the Colonial Office, assisted by an Advisory Council nominated by him from his officials. These, together with the police and judiciary, were initially mainly British, but, in the civil service, British subjects were gradually replace by Arabs and Jews in all but the most senior appointments. The Administration was supported by a British garrison. With this mandate His Majesty's Government accepted certain obligations, which are set out in two documents: the Covenant of the League of Nations and the Mandate for Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of NATO: 1948--1949
    Emory International Law Review Volume 34 Issue 0 The North Atlantic Treaty Organization's Seventieth Anniversary 2019 Origins of NATO: 1948--1949 Lawrence S. Kaplan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr Recommended Citation Lawrence S. Kaplan, Origins of NATO: 1948--1949, 34 Emory Int'l L. Rev. 11 (2019). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/eilr/vol34/iss0/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory International Law Review by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KAPLANPROOFS2_10.24.19 10/28/2019 1:48 PM ORIGINS OF NATO: 1948-1949 Lawrence S. Kaplan* OVERVIEW The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) originated in the trauma of World War II. The human cost of that war at last motivated Europe to remove the barriers to economic integration that had promoted warfare among the nation-states since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648.1 The devastation of western Europe also inspired the United States as the major victor in that war to abandon its traditional isolation from European political and military affairs.2 Accelerating these fundamental changes was the awareness on both sides of the Atlantic of the threat Soviet-led Communism posed to the future of Western democracy.3 However, recognizing the necessity did not equate with effective immediate action to cope with these two challenges in the post-war world. Too many obstacles had to be overcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Institute for Palestine Studies | Journals
    Institute for Palestine Studies | Journals Journal of Palestine Studies issue 141, published in Fall 2006 The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Ilan Pappé This article, excerpted and adapted from the early chapters of a new book, emphasizes the systematic preparations that laid the ground for the expulsion of more than 750,000 Palestinians from what became Israel in 1948. While sketching the context and diplomatic and political developments of the period, the article highlights in particular a multi-year “Village Files” project (1940–47) involving the systematic compilation of maps and intelligence for each Arab village and the elaboration—under the direction of an inner “caucus” of fewer than a dozen men led by David Ben-Gurion—of a series of military plans culminating in Plan Dalet, according to which the 1948 war was fought. The article ends with a statement of one of the author’s underlying goals in writing the book: to make the case for a paradigm of ethnic cleansing to replace the paradigm of war as the basis for the scholarly research of, and the public debate about, 1948. ILAN PAPPÉ, an Israeli historian and professor of political science at Haifa University, is the author of a number of books, including The Making of the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1947–1951 (I. B. Tauris, 1994) and A History of Modern Palestine: One Land, Two Peoples (Cambridge University Press, 2004). The current article is extracted from early chapters of his latest book, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Oneworld Publications, Oxford, England, forthcoming in October 2006). THE 1948 ETHNIC CLEANSING OF PALESTINE ILAN PAPPÉ This article, excerpted and adapted from the early chapters of a new book, emphasizes the systematic preparations that laid the ground for the expulsion of more than 750,000 Palestinians from what became Israel in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Alamance County World War II Deaths There Were Approximately 220
    Alamance County World War II Deaths There were approximately 220 local deaths in World War II. This information was compiled from microfilm for the Local History Collection at May Memorial Library with the help of Miriam Pace, library volunteer and member of the Alamance County Friends of the Library, who spent many hours researching and copying. Allen, Robert Cecil son of George Walter Allen and Dora Bailey Allen died April 11, 1945 in World War II buried at Cane Creek Friends Burial Ground Source: The Allen Family by Lester M. Allen Anderson, Roy Clifton Private First Class son of Mr. and Mrs. C.L. Anderson of South Park Ave., Burlington died October 3, 1944 as a result of injuries received in a vehicle accident He had been overseas since June 1943. He is survived by his parents and a sister, Mrs. J.K. Dixon of Burlington Source: Times-News Nov. 13, 1944 Askew, Harrell Coble Corporal of Askew St., Burlington died July 13, 1945 in Burlington at age 26 years. Funeral services were held at the First Reformed Church and honorary pallbearers were supplied by a detachment from O.R.D. at Greensboro. Interment was in Pine Hill Cemetery in Burlington. Source: Times-News July 19, 1945 Ausley, Williams Shreve Gunner’s Mate son of Mr. and Mrs. W.F. Ausley of Elon College was killed August 9, 1944 while serving on PT 509. Ausley was inducted into the Naval Reserve in February 1942 and went overseas to England in 1944. He was originally buried on Guernsey Island by the Germans after the sinking of his boat.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory Dep.288 BBC Scottish
    Inventory Dep.288 BBC Scottish National Library of Scotland Manuscripts Division George IV Bridge Edinburgh EH1 1EW Tel: 0131-466 2812 Fax: 0131-466 2811 E-mail: [email protected] © Trustees of the National Library of Scotland Typescript records of programmes, 1935-54, broadcast by the BBC Scottish Region (later Scottish Home Service). 1. February-March, 1935. 2. May-August, 1935. 3. September-December, 1935. 4. January-April, 1936. 5. May-August, 1936. 6. September-December, 1936. 7. January-February, 1937. 8. March-April, 1937. 9. May-June, 1937. 10. July-August, 1937. 11. September-October, 1937. 12. November-December, 1937. 13. January-February, 1938. 14. March-April, 1938. 15. May-June, 1938. 16. July-August, 1938. 17. September-October, 1938. 18. November-December, 1938. 19. January, 1939. 20. February, 1939. 21. March, 1939. 22. April, 1939. 23. May, 1939. 24. June, 1939. 25. July, 1939. 26. August, 1939. 27. January, 1940. 28. February, 1940. 29. March, 1940. 30. April, 1940. 31. May, 1940. 32. June, 1940. 33. July, 1940. 34. August, 1940. 35. September, 1940. 36. October, 1940. 37. November, 1940. 38. December, 1940. 39. January, 1941. 40. February, 1941. 41. March, 1941. 42. April, 1941. 43. May, 1941. 44. June, 1941. 45. July, 1941. 46. August, 1941. 47. September, 1941. 48. October, 1941. 49. November, 1941. 50. December, 1941. 51. January, 1942. 52. February, 1942. 53. March, 1942. 54. April, 1942. 55. May, 1942. 56. June, 1942. 57. July, 1942. 58. August, 1942. 59. September, 1942. 60. October, 1942. 61. November, 1942. 62. December, 1942. 63. January, 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judge Advocate Journal, Bulletin No. 2, June 1949
    BULLETIN No. 2 JUNE, 1949 The Judge Advocate Published Quarterly By JUDGE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION 312 DENRIKE BUILDING WASHINGTON 5, D. C. THE JUDGE ADVOCATE JOURNAL OFFICERS FOR 1948-49 WILLIAM f. HUGHES, JR ., Washington, D. C. .... President GEORGE HAFER, Harrisburg, Pa. 1st Vice President ALEXANDER PIRNIE, Utica, N. Y. ............. 2nd Vice President SAMUEL F. BEACH, Washington, D. C. ... Secretary EDWARD B. BEALE , Washington, D. C. .. Treasurer RALP H G. BoYD, Boston, Mass. Delegate to A.B.A. DIRECTORS Earnest M. Brannon, Wash., D. C. Joseph F. O'Connell, Jr., Boston, Mass. John W. Ahern, Wash .. D. C. Robert R. Dickey, Jr., Wash., D. C. Milton J. Blake, Denver, Colo. John Ritchie, III, Charlottesville, Va. Roy L. Deal, Winston-Salem, N. C. Edward F. Gallagher, Wash., D .C. Oliver P. Bennett, Mapleton, Iowa John P. Oliver, Van Nuys, Calif., and Wash., D. C. Executive Secretary and Editor RICHARD H. LOVE Washington, D. C. BULLETIN No. 2 JUNE, 1949 Publication Notice The views expressed in articles printed herein are not to be regarded as those of the Judge Advocates Association or its officers and directors or of the editor unless expressly so stated. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Results of Uniform Code Questionnaire. .. ..... ...... .... ................... 1 Notes from the Office of the JAG - .......................................... 26 Points Toward Retirement . .. .. ...... ........ .... --- ................ 27 Awards of Merit .. ................................................... 28 Training, Points and Retirement-Correspondence .. .................29 Nominating Committee ........................................ 32 Civilian Military Government Courts in Germay .........................33 The JAG's Statement to the Senate Armed Services Committee .. ........ .... ................. _ ... ............... 38 What the Members Are Doing _....... ...... ........... ..... ...................48 Annual Meeting at St. Louis .... .. ... .... .. ....................... ...............52 Published by fudge Advocates Association 312 Denrike Building, Washington 5, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Security Legislation, January-June 1948: Legislative History and Background
    Social Security Legislation, January-June Historical Background One of the first significant steps 1948: Legislative History and Background leading to the passage of the news vendors law occurred in April 1944, By Wilbur J. Cohen and James L. Calhoon* when the Supreme Court declared that vendors making street sales at established locations and working The following article outlines the legislation in the field full time for the Hearst Corporation of social security enacted by the Eightieth Congress in the and other publishers in Los Angeles first 6 months of 1948. Because of the divergent viewpoints were employees of the newspapers for underlying the development of some of the amendments purposes of the National Labor Re• and the implication of the provisions for the social security lations Act (National Labor Relations program, the authors have also sketched in briefly, as a Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 matter of record, the legislative history and background of U. S. 111). This decision seemed to the various provisions. indicate that the vendors might be employees under the Social Security THERE was considerable legislative cording to the sponsor of the legis• Act. In 1946 the District Court of the activity in the field of social security lation, are affected immediately.1 United States for the Northern Dis• during the second regular session of The new law does not change the trict of California, Southern Division, the Eightieth Congress. Numerous status of the ordinary newsboy. Most heard the cases, Hearst Publications, bills to amend the Social Security Act newsboys are not covered by the Social Inc.
    [Show full text]