DOCSLIB.ORG

Catalogue Lepturinae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catalogue Lepturinae Lepturinae Latreille, 1802 Desmocerini Blanchard, 1845 Desmocerites Bllanchard, 1845: 163 Desmoceritæ Thomson, 1860 Desmocerini LeConte, 1873 Desmocerus Dejean, 1821 [Monotypie] Stenocorus cyaneus Fabricius, 1775 Desmocere Blanchard, 1845: 163 1 Desmocerus aureipennis Chevrolat, 1855 Desmocerus aureipennis Chevrolat, 1855 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) Desmocerus auripennis LeConte, 1857 Desmocerus auripennis auripennis Hatch, 1971 2 Desmocerus aureipennis cribripennis Horn, 1881 Desmocerus cribripennis Horn, 1881 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) Desmocerus auripennis cribripennis Hatch, 1971 Desmocerus aureipennis cribripennis Monné, 1995 3 Desmocerus aureipennis lacustris Linsley & Chemsak, 1972 Desmocerus auripennis lacustris Linsley & Chemsak, 1972 Desmocerus aureipennis lacustris Monné, 1995 4 Desmocerus aureipennis piperi Webb, 1905 Desmocerus piperi Webb, 1905 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) Desmocerus cribripennis piperi Doane et al., 1936 Desmocerus auripennis piperi Linsley & Chemsak, 1972 Desmocerus aureipennis piperi Monné, 1995 5 Desmocerus californicus Horn, 1881 Desmocerus californicus Horn, 1881 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) 6 Desmocerus californicus dimorphus Fisher, 1921 Desmocerus dimorphus Fisher, 1921 Desmocerus californicus dimorphus Doane et al., 1936 7 Desmocerus palliatus (Forster, 1771) Cerambyx palliatus Forster, 1771 Calopus blandus Fabricius, 1775 Stenocorus cyaneus Fabricius, 1775 (Illiger, 1805) Desmocerus cyaneus Dejean, 1821 (Thomson, 1864) Desmocerus palliatus Harris, 1841 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue] ; Lingafelter, 2007) Desmocere cyaneus Blanchard, 1845: 177 Desmocerus elongatus Bland, 1862 Encyclopini LeConte, 1873 Encyclopini LeConte, 1873: 326 Encylopini Danilevsky, 2010 [sic] retained as valid Encyclops Newman, 1838 [Monotypie] Encyclops pallipes Newman, 1838 Microrhabdium Krattz, 1879 ([Monotypie] Microrhabdium macilentum Kraatz, 1879) Microrrhabdium Cherepanov, 1988 [misspelling]) 8 Encyclops caerulea (Say, 1826) Leptura caerulea Say, 1826 Encyclops pallipes Newman, 1838 Encyclops caeruleus Haldeman, 1847 Encyclops coeruleus Thomson, 1864 Encyclops caerulea Lacordaire, 1869 (Rice & Veal, 2006 ; Lingafelter, 2007) Encyclops coerulea Gemminger & Harold, 1872 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) 9 Encyclops californica Van Dyke, 1920 Encyclops californicus Van Dyke, 1920 Encyclops californica Linsley & Chemsak, 1972 mercredi 30 mars 2016 Page 1 of 154 10 Encyclops concinna Holzschuh, 1991 Encyclops concinna Holzschuh, 1991 11 Encyclops hubeiensis Ohbayashi & Wang, 2004 ncyclops hubeiensis Ohbayashi & Wang, 2004 12 Encyclops luteoscelis Chou & Ohbayashi, 2010 Encyclops luteoscelis Chou & Ohbayashi, 2010 13 Encyclops macilenta (Kraatz, 1879) Microrhabdium macilentum Kraatz, 1879 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) Encyclops macilenta Gressitt, 1947 (Wang, 2003) Encyclops macilentum Cherepanov, 1988 14 Encyclops obscurellus Holzschuh, 2015 Encyclops obscurellus Holzschuh, 2015: 42 ([Holotype] China mer., Yunnan prov., Pass 50 km W from Judian Coll. Holzschuh) 15 Encyclops olivacea Bates, 1884 Encyclops olivacea Bates, 1884 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue] ; Cherepanov, 1988 ; Ohbayashi & Niisato, 2007) Microrhabdium jozanense Matsushita, 1933 Microrhabdium olivaceum Mitono, 1941 16 Encyclops ussuricus Cherepanov & Cherepanova, 1975 Encyclops ussuricus Cherepanov & Cherepanova, 1975 (Cherepanov, 1988) 17 Encyclops viridipennis Makihara, 1978 Encyclops viridipennis Makihara, 1978 (Nakamura et al., 1992 ; Nara, 2002) 18 Encyclops x-signata Chiang, 1981 Encyclops x-signata Chiang, 1981 Eroschemini Lacordaire, 1868 Éroschémides Lacordaire, 1868: 515 Eroschemini Aurivillius, 1912: 287 Chaodalis Pascoe, 1865 [Monotypie] Chaodalis Macleayi Pascoe, 1865 19 Chaodalis macleayi Pascoe, 1865 Chaodalis macleayi Pascoe, 1865 (Aurivillius, 1912) 20 Chaodalis taylori McKeown, 1942 Chaodalis taylori McKeown, 1942 Eroschema Pascoe, 1859 [Monotypie] Eroschema Poweri Pascoe, 1859 Octavia Thomson, 1860 ([Monotypie] Octavia nigricollis Thomson, 1860) 21 Eroschema affine Pascoe, 1888 Eroschema affine Pascoe, 1888 (Aurivillius, 1912) 22 Eroschema apicipenne McKeown, 1942 Aroschema apicipenne McKeown, 1942 23 Eroschema atricolle Pascoe, 1865 Eroschema atricolle Pascoe, 1865 (Aurivillius, 1912) 24 Eroschema poweri Pascoe, 1859 Eroschema poweri Pascoe, 1859 (Thomson, 1864 ; Aurivillius, 1912) Octavia nigricollis Thomson, 1860 mercredi 30 mars 2016 Page 2 of 154 Lepturini Kirby 1837 Lepturetæ Latreille, 1802: 218 Lepturites Blanchard, 1845: 163 Grammoptérates Mulsant, 1863: 569 Lepturinæ Pascoe, 1869: 553 Lepturini LeConte, 1873: 292 Lepturaires Planet, 1924: 44 Strangalini Zagajkevich, 1991: 96 Acanthoptura Fairmaire, 1894 [Monotypie] Acanthoptura spinipennis Fairmaire, 1894 25 Acanthoptura denticollis Holzschuh, 1993 Acanthoptura denticollis Holzschuh, 1993 26 Acanthoptura sericeicollis Holzschuh, 1993 Acanthoptura sericeicollis Holzschuh, 1993 27 Acanthoptura simplicicollis Holzschuh, 1993 Acanthoptura simplicicollis Holzschuh, 1993 28 Acanthoptura spinipennis Fairmaire, 1894 Acanthoptura spinipennis Fairmaire, 1894 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) Leptura impressicollis Pic, 1920 Leptura (Acanthoptura) spinipennis Gressitt, 1951 Nivellia (Nivelliomorpha) impressicollis Gressitt, 1951 Acanthoptura impressicollis Holzschuh, 1993 29 Acanthoptura truncatipennis Holzschuh, 1993 Acanthoptura truncatipennis Holzschuh, 1993 Acmaeopidonia Tippmann, 1955 [Désignation orig. & Monotypie] Acmaeopidonia aerifera Tippmann, 1955 30 Acmaeopidonia aerifera Tippmann, 1955 Acmaeopidonia aerifera Tippmann, 1955 Alosterna Mulsant, 1863 [Monotypie] Leptura tabacicolor Degeer, 1775 Allosterna Stierlin, 1886 [misspelling] 31 Alosterna anatolica Adlbauer, 1992 Alosterna anatolica Adlbauer, 1992 (Sama et al., 2011: 825) 32 Alosterna barimanii Danilevsky, 2010 Alosterna barimanii Danilevsky, 2010: 3 ([Holotype] Iran, Mazendaran prov., env. Ghaemshar, Nezami Coll.Danilevsky) 33 Alosterna chalybeella (Bates, 1884) Grammoptera chalybeella Bates, 1884 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue] ; Wang, 2003) Allosterna elegantula var. debilis Tamanuki, 1933 [misspelling] Grammoptera japonica Pic, 1935 Allosterna chalybeella Cherepanov, 1979 [misspelling] Alosterna chalybeella Lobanov et al., 1981 (Ohbayashi & Niisato, 2007) 34 Alosterna erythropus (Gebler, 1841) Grammoptera erythropus Gebler, 1841 (Bense, 1995) Grammoptera variegata var.? erythropus Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue] Alosterna erythropus Lobanov et al., 1981 35 Alosterna erythropus ingrica (Baeckmann, 1902) Grammoptera ingrica Baeckmann, 1902 (Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue]) Grammoptera erythropus ingrica Cherepanov, 1979 Alosterna erythropus ingrica Lobanov et al., 1981 (Sama, 2002 ; Sláma, 2006) Grammoptera erythropus Bense, 1995 Alosterna ingrica Jeniš, 2001 mercredi 30 mars 2016 Page 3 of 154 36 Alosterna pauli Pesarini et al., 2004 Alosterna pauli Pesarini et al., 2004 (Kalávrita (nomos Ahaia) Grèce occidentale Coll.Pesarini & Sabbadini) 37 Alosterna perpera Danilevsky, 1988 Alosterna perpera Danilevsky, 1988 (Wang, 2003) 38 Alosterna scapularis (Heyden, 1878) talyschensis Reitter, 1885 Alosterna scapularis Aurivillius, 1912 [catalogue] (Sama et al., 2008) Allosterna scapularis Abai, 1969 [misspelling] 39 Alosterna tabacicolor (Degeer, 1775) Leptura (tabacicolor) nigra Schaeff. in Degeer, 1775: 139 Leptura tabacicolor Degeer, 1775: 139 Grammoptera (Alosterna) tabacicolor; Mulsant, 1863: 576 (Rose, 1983: 47) Grammoptera tabacicolor; Heyden, 1881 Leptura (Alosterna) tabacicolor; Ganglbauer, 1882 Alosterna tabacicolor; Pic, 1892 (Aurivillius, 1912: 206 [catalogue] ; Bijiaoui, 1986: 9 ; Bense, 1995: 143 ; Vitali, 1995: 68 ; Sama, 2002: 36 ; Wang, 2003: 71 ; Rapuzzi & Sama, 2006: 161 ; Sláma, 2006: 12 ; Ohbayashi & Niisato, 2007: 390 ; Berger, 2008: 99 ; Allemand et al., 2009: 111 ; Hubweber & Schmitt, 2009: 41 ; Lacoste, 2013: 143 ; Vitali, 2013: 146 [Luxembourg] ; Vitali, 2014: 80 ; Karpiński et al., 2015: 10 [Pologne]) Allosterna tabacicolor; Heyrovský, 1930: 19 [misspelling] (Niisato, 2001: 11) Alosterna (Alosterna) tabacicolor subsp. tabacicolor; Özdikmen, 2014: 387 melanura var. Müller, 1776 Leptura Chrysomeloides Schrank, 1781: 158 ([Holotype] Austria NMW) Alosterna chrysomeloides Reitter, 1885 Leptura Solstitialis Herbst, 1784: 103 ([Syntypes] Berlin MNHU) Leptura Genii Gmelin, 1789: 1877 ([Holotype] Europa NHRS) Leptura laevis Fabricius, 1793: 340 (Kiliae) (nec Herbst, 1784) (Illiger, 1805: 121) Grammoptera laevis; Küster, 1846: 79 Grammoptera lævis; Tournier, 1872: 349 Alosterna tabacicolor var. dispar Pic, 1892: 140 ([Syntypes] Puy-de-Dôme ; Alpes MNHN) Alosterna bicoloripes Pic, 1914: 65 ([Holotype] Rhodes MNHN) Allosterna tabacicolor subsp. bicoloripes; Delmet, 1963: 141 Alosterna tabacicolor var. fusca Matsushita, 1930 40 Alosterna tabacicolor erythropus (Gebler, 1841) Leptura Erythropus Gebler, 1841: 612 ([Holotype] Semel in montibus Kusnezk MNHN) Alosterna erythropus; Sama, 2002; 36 Alosterna tabacicolor subsp. erythropus; Danilevsky, 2012: 906 Grammoptera testacea Motschulsky, 1860: 146 ([Holotype] Daourie ZMUM) Grammoptera bivittis Motschulsky, 1860: 146 ([Syntypes] Daourie et les bords du fl. Amour, et aussi les Alpes de l'Arménie ZMUM) Alosterna tabacicolor subsp. bivittis; Hua, 2002: 192 Alosterna plavilstshikovi Podaný, 1963: 49 (Tuva) 41 Alosterna tabacicolor sakhalinensis Danilevsky, 2012 Alosterna tabacicolor subsp. sakhalinensis Danilevsky, 2012: 905 ([Holotype] Russia, Sakhalin Is.: 45km SE Tymovsk [50°39’ N, 143°13’ E] Coll. Danilevsky) 42 Alosterna tabacicolor subvittata
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Artificial Laboratory Breeding of Xylophagous Insect Larvae and Its Application in Cytogenetic Studies 2)
    Eos, t. LXII, págs. 7-22 (1986). Artificial laboratory breeding of xylophagous insect larvae and its application in cytogenetic studies 2) BY J. R. BARAGAÑO, A. NOTARIO y M. G. DE VIEDMA. INTRODUCTION HAYDAK, in 1936, managed to rear Oryzaephilus surinantensis (L.) in the la- boratory using an artificial diet. Many researchers have followed in his footsteps, so that since then, approximately 260 species of Coleoptera have been raised on nonnatural diets. Among these species there are 121 which are eminently xylophagous. They belong to seven families (Buprestidae, Elateridae, Bostrychiclae, Lyctidae, Myc- teridae, Cerambyciclae and Curculionidae). Their importance, from the economic point of view, varies widely : some of them attack living trees making them a pest ; others feed on dead or decaying wood so that they may be considered harmless or even beneficial (for example in the decomposition of tree stumps in forests) ; finally, a few cause damage to seasoned timber. Therefore, specialists in artificial breeding have been motivated by different objectives, and so have chosen the insect or insects in each case which were most suitable for obtaining specific desired results. It is clear that in the majority of cases the choice was not made at random. Generally, the insect studied was either recently established as a pest or well documented as such. •With these laboratory breeding experiments it is possible on the one hand to draw conclusions about the insects' nutritive requirements, parasitism, ethology etc ; and on the other to obtain enough specimens to try out different phytosanitary treatments with them. Both of these achievements are applicable to effectiye control of the insect problem.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids
    4 Reproductive Biology of Cerambycids Lawrence M. Hanks University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, Illinois Qiao Wang Massey University Palmerston North, New Zealand CONTENTS 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 133 4.2 Phenology of Adults ..................................................................................................................... 134 4.3 Diet of Adults ............................................................................................................................... 138 4.4 Location of Host Plants and Mates .............................................................................................. 138 4.5 Recognition of Mates ................................................................................................................... 140 4.6 Copulation .................................................................................................................................... 141 4.7 Larval Host Plants, Oviposition Behavior, and Larval Development .......................................... 142 4.8 Mating Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 144 4.9 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 148 Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Host Plant for Brachyleptura Champlaini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 18 Number 4 - Winter 1985 Number 4 - Winter Article 9 1985 December 1985 Host Plant for Brachyleptura Champlaini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) D. C. L. Gosling Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gosling, D. C. L. 1985. "Host Plant for Brachyleptura Champlaini (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 18 (4) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol18/iss4/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gosling: Host Plant for <i>Brachyleptura Champlaini</i> (Coleoptera: Ceram 1985 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 167 HOST PLANT FOR BRACHYLEPTURA CHAMPLAINI (COLEOPTERA: CERAMBYCIDAE) D. C. L. Goslingl Brachyleptura champlaini Casey was relegated to synonymy with Anoplodera vagans (Olivier) by Swaine and Hopping (1928), and was so regarded until Linsley and Chemsak (1976) restored the status of both Casey's species and the genus Brachyleptura. The species occurring in Michigan is B. clwmplaini and not Brachyleptura vagans as recorded by Gosling and Gosling (1976). Because of confm,ion between these two species in the literature, Linsley and Chemsak were not able to list a host plant for B. champlain!. I have recently been successful in rearing this species from decayed bolts of red pine, Pinus res!nosa Ail., collected near Klinger Lake in St. Joseph County.
    [Show full text]
  • Layman's Report
    THE RED LIST STATUS OF EUROPE’S OVERLOOKED SPECIES LIFE14 PRE BE 001 – Layman’s report This project was co-funded by the European Union under the LIFE Financial Instrument and the Grant Agreement n. LIFE14 PRE BE 001 About IUCN Created in 1948, IUCN represents one of the world’s largest and most diverse environmental networks. It harnesses the experience, resources and reach of more than 1,300 member organisations and the input of over 15,000 volunteer experts, organised in six commissions. IUCN is the global authority on the status of the natural world and the measures needed to safeguard it. The IUCN Global Species Programme supports the activities of the IUCN Species Survival Commission and individual Specialist Groups, as well as implementing global species conservation initiatives. It is an integral part of the IUCN Secretariat and is managed from IUCN’s international headquarters in Gland, Switzerland. What is the IUCN Red List? The European Red List The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM is the When conducting regional or national assessments, world’s most comprehensive information source on and to ensure that the criteria are applied the extinction risk of plant and animal species. It is a appropriately at such scales, the IUCN has compilation of the conservation status of species at developed the Guidelines for Application of IUCN Red the global level, based on the best scientific List Criteria at Regional Levels.1 information available. The IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria are based on a set of quantitative criteria linked to population trends, size and structure, threats, and geographic ranges of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Afghanistan Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) with Two Descriptions of New Phytoecia (Parobereina Danilevsky, 2018) from Central Asia
    Humanity space International almanac VOL. 8, No 2, 2019: 104-140 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:30F6FA0A-2D7A-4ED2-9EAE-AB7707FFBE61 Catalogue of Afghanistan Longhorn beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) with two descriptions of new Phytoecia (Parobereina Danilevsky, 2018) from Central Asia M.A. Lazarev State Budget Professional Educational Institution of the Moscow Region “Chekhov technical college” Novaya str., 4, Novyi Byt village, Chekhov District, Moscow Region 142322 Russia e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Key words: Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, taxonomy, distribution, new species, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Abstract: The Catalogue includes all 78 Cerambycidae species of Afghanistan fauna known up to 2019 with the references to the original descriptions; 22 species were not mentioned for Afghanistan in Palaearctic Cerambycidae Catalogue by Löbl & Smetana (2010). Bibliography of each species usually includes the geographical information from corresponding publications. Many new taxonomy positions published after 2010 are used here without special remarks. Agapanthia (Epoptes) dahli ustinovi Danilevsky, 2013 stat. nov. is downgraded from the species level. Two species are described as new Phytoecia (Parobereina) pashtunica sp. n. from Afghanistan and Phytoecia (Parobereina) heinzi sp.n. from Pakistan. The present work is an attempt to summarize all data published up to now on Cerambycidae of Afghanistan fauna. Family CERAMBYCIDAE Latreille, 1802 subfamily Prioninae Latreille, 1802 tribe Macrotomini J. Thomson, 1861 genus Anomophysis Quentin & Villiers, 1981: 374 type species Prionus spinosus Fabricius, 1787 inscripta C.O. Waterhouse, 1884: 380 (Macrotoma) Heyrovský, 1936: 211 - Wama; Tippmann, 1958: 41 - Kabul, Ost- Afghanistan, 1740; Sarobi, am Kabulflus, 900 m; Mangul, Bashgultal, Nuristan, Ost-Afghanistan, 1250 m; Fuchs, 1961: 259 - Sarobi 1100 m, O.-Afghanistan; Fuchs, 1967: 432 - Afghanistan, 25 km N von Barikot, 1800 m, Nuristan; Nimla, 40 km SW von Dschelalabad; Heyrovský, 1967: 156 - Zentral-Afghanistan, Prov.
    [Show full text]
  • And Lepidoptera Associated with Fraxinus Pennsylvanica Marshall (Oleaceae) in the Red River Valley of Eastern North Dakota
    A FAUNAL SURVEY OF COLEOPTERA, HEMIPTERA (HETEROPTERA), AND LEPIDOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH FRAXINUS PENNSYLVANICA MARSHALL (OLEACEAE) IN THE RED RIVER VALLEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By James Samuel Walker In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Entomology March 2014 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School North DakotaTitle State University North DaGkroadtaua Stet Sacteho Uolniversity A FAUNAL SURVEYG rOFad COLEOPTERA,uate School HEMIPTERA (HETEROPTERA), AND LEPIDOPTERA ASSOCIATED WITH Title A FFRAXINUSAUNAL S UPENNSYLVANICARVEY OF COLEO MARSHALLPTERTAitl,e HEM (OLEACEAE)IPTERA (HET INER THEOPTE REDRA), AND LAE FPAIDUONPATLE RSUAR AVSESYO COIFA CTOEDLE WOIPTTHE RFRAA, XHIENMUISP PTENRNAS (YHLEVTAENRICOAP TMEARRAS),H AANLDL RIVER VALLEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA L(EOPLIDEAOCPTEEAREA) I ANS TSHOEC RIAETDE RDI VWEITRH V FARLALXEIYN UOSF P EEANSNTSEYRLNV ANNOICRAT HM DAARKSHOATALL (OLEACEAE) IN THE RED RIVER VAL LEY OF EASTERN NORTH DAKOTA ByB y By JAMESJAME SSAMUEL SAMUE LWALKER WALKER JAMES SAMUEL WALKER TheThe Su pSupervisoryervisory C oCommitteemmittee c ecertifiesrtifies t hthatat t hthisis ddisquisition isquisition complies complie swith wit hNorth Nor tDakotah Dako ta State State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of University’s regulations and meetMASTERs the acce pOFted SCIENCE standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: David A. Rider DCoa-­CCo-Chairvhiadi rA.
    [Show full text]
  • Molekulární Fylogeneze Podčeledí Spondylidinae a Lepturinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) Pomocí Mitochondriální 16S Rdna
    Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích Přírodovědecká fakulta Bakalářská práce Molekulární fylogeneze podčeledí Spondylidinae a Lepturinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) pomocí mitochondriální 16S rDNA Miroslava Sýkorová Školitel: PaedDr. Martina Žurovcová, PhD Školitel specialista: RNDr. Petr Švácha, CSc. České Budějovice 2008 Bakalářská práce Sýkorová, M., 2008. Molekulární fylogeneze podčeledí Spondylidinae a Lepturinae (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) pomocí mitochondriální 16S rDNA [Molecular phylogeny of subfamilies Spondylidinae and Lepturinae based on mitochondrial 16S rDNA, Bc. Thesis, in Czech]. Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic. 34 pp. Annotation This study uses cca. 510 bp of mitochondrial 16S rDNA gene for phylogeny of the beetle family Cerambycidae particularly the subfamilies Spondylidinae and Lepturinae using methods of Minimum Evolutin, Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Analysis. Two included representatives of Dorcasominae cluster with species of the subfamilies Prioninae and Cerambycinae, confirming lack of relations to Lepturinae where still classified by some authors. The subfamily Spondylidinae, lacking reliable morfological apomorphies, is supported as monophyletic, with Spondylis as an ingroup. Our data is inconclusive as to whether Necydalinae should be better clasified as a separate subfamily or as a tribe within Lepturinae. Of the lepturine tribes, Lepturini (including the genera Desmocerus, Grammoptera and Strophiona) and Oxymirini are reasonably supported, whereas Xylosteini does not come out monophyletic in MrBayes. Rhagiini is not retrieved as monophyletic. Position of some isolated genera such as Rhamnusium, Sachalinobia, Caraphia, Centrodera, Teledapus, or Enoploderes, as well as interrelations of higher taxa within Lepturinae, remain uncertain. Tato práce byla financována z projektu studentské grantové agentury SGA 2007/009 a záměru Entomologického ústavu Z 50070508. Prohlašuji, že jsem tuto bakalářskou práci vypracovala samostatně, pouze s použitím uvedené literatury.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology Publishes a Wide Variety of Papers
    _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ I MUNIS ENTOMOLOGY & ZOOLOGY Ankara / Turkey II _____________ Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 4, No. 1, January 2009___________ Scope: Munis Entomology & Zoology publishes a wide variety of papers on all aspects of Entomology and Zoology from all of the world, including mainly studies on systematics, taxonomy, nomenclature, fauna, biogeography, biodiversity, ecology, morphology, behavior, conservation, paleobiology and other aspects are appropriate topics for papers submitted to Munis Entomology & Zoology. Submission of Manuscripts: Works published or under consideration elsewhere (including on the internet) will not be accepted. At first submission, one double spaced hard copy (text and tables) with figures (may not be original) must be sent to the Editors, Dr. Hüseyin Özdikmen for publication in MEZ. All manuscripts should be submitted as Word file or PDF file in an e-mail attachment. If electronic submission is not possible due to limitations of electronic space at the sending or receiving ends, unavailability of e-mail, etc., we will accept “hard” versions, in triplicate, accompanied by an electronic version stored in a floppy disk, a CD-ROM. Review Process: When submitting manuscripts, all authors provides the name, of at least three qualified experts (they also provide their address, subject fields and e-mails). Then, the editors send to experts to review the papers. The review process should normally be completed within 45-60 days. After reviewing papers by reviwers: Rejected papers are discarded. For accepted papers, authors are asked to modify their papers according to suggestions of the reviewers and editors. Final versions of manuscripts and figures are needed in a digital format.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera) of the Huron Mountains in Northern Michigan
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 19 Number 3 - Fall 1986 Number 3 - Fall 1986 Article 3 October 1986 Ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Huron Mountains in Northern Michigan D. C. L. Gosling Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Gosling, D. C. L. 1986. "Ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Huron Mountains in Northern Michigan," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 19 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol19/iss3/3 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Gosling: Ecology of the Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) of the Huron Mountains i 1986 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 153 ECOLOGY OF THE CERAMBYCIDAE (COLEOPTERA) OF THE HURON MOUNTAINS IN NORTHERN MICHIGAN D. C. L Gosling! ABSTRACT Eighty-nine species of Cerambycidae were collected during a five-year survey of the woodboring beetle fauna of the Huron Mountains in Marquette County, Michigan. Host plants were deteTITIined for 51 species. Observations were made of species abundance and phenology, and the blossoms visited by anthophilous cerambycids. The Huron Mountains area comprises approximately 13,000 ha of forested land in northern Marquette County in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. More than 7000 ha are privately owned by the Huron Mountain Club, including a designated, 2200 ha, Nature Research Area. The variety of habitats combines with differences in the nature and extent of prior disturbance to produce an exceptional diversity of forest communities, making the area particularly valuable for studies of forest insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Mongolian Oak (Quercus Mongolica) Forests in Changbai Mountain, Jilin Province, China
    Spatial Distribution Pattern of Longhorn Beetle Assemblages (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Mongolian Oak (Quercus Mongolica) Forests in Changbai Mountain, Jilin Province, China Shengdong Liu Beihua University Xin Meng Beijing Forestry University Yan Li Beihua University Qingfan Meng ( [email protected] ) Beihua University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3245-7315 Hongri Zhao Beihang University Yinghua Jin Northeast Normal University Research Keywords: longhorn beetles, topographic condition, vertical height, Mongolian oak forest, Changbai Mountain Posted Date: August 17th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-795304/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/28 Abstract Background: Mongolian oak forest is a deciduous secondary forest with a large distribution area in the Changbai Mountain area. The majority of longhorn beetle species feed on forest resources, The number of some species is also large, which has a potential risk for forest health, and have even caused serious damage to forests. Clarifying the distribution pattern of longhorn beetles in Mongolian oak forests is of great scientic value for the monitoring and control of some pest populations. Methods: 2018 and 2020, ying interception traps were used to continuously collect longhorn samples from the canopy and bottom of the ridge, southern slope, and northern slope of the oak forest in Changbai Mountain, and the effects of topographic conditions on the spatial distribution pattern of longhorn beetles were analyzed. Results: A total of 4090 individuals, 56 species, and 6 subfamilies of longhorn beetles were collected in two years. The number of species and individuals of Cerambycinae and Lamiinae were the highest, and the number of Massicus raddei (Blessig), Moechotypa diphysis (Pascoe), Mesosa myopsmyops (Dalman), and Prionus insularis Motschulsky was relatively abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Distance to Urban Areas on Saproxylic Beetles in Urban Forests
    Effect of distance to urban areas on saproxylic beetles in urban forests Effekt av avstånd till bebyggda områden på vedlevande skalbaggar i urbana skogsområden Jeffery D Marker Faculty of Health, Science and Technology Biology: Ecology and Conservation Biology Master’s thesis, 30 hp Supervisor: Denis Lafage Examiner: Larry Greenberg 2019-01-29 Series number: 19:07 2 Abstract Urban forests play key roles in animal and plant biodiversity and provide important ecosystem services. Habitat fragmentation and expanding urbanization threaten biodiversity in and around urban areas. Saproxylic beetles can act as bioindicators of forest health and their diversity may help to explain and define urban-forest edge effects. I explored the relationship between saproxylic beetle diversity and distance to an urban area along nine transects in the Västra Götaland region of Sweden. Specifically, the relationships between abundance and species richness and distance from the urban- forest boundary, forest age, forest volume, and tree species ratio was investigated Unbaited flight interception traps were set at intervals of 0, 250, and 500 meters from an urban-forest boundary to measure beetle abundance and richness. A total of 4182 saproxylic beetles representing 179 species were captured over two months. Distance from the urban forest boundary showed little overall effect on abundance suggesting urban proximity does not affect saproxylic beetle abundance. There was an effect on species richness, with saproxylic species richness greater closer to the urban-forest boundary. Forest volume had a very small positive effect on both abundance and species richness likely due to a limited change in volume along each transect. An increase in the occurrence of deciduous tree species proved to be an important factor driving saproxylic beetle abundance moving closer to the urban-forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle Withdrawal
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0063] [FXES11130900000C2-123-FF09E32000] RIN 1018–AV29 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Withdrawal of the Proposed Rule To Remove the Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle From the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), withdraw the proposed rule to remove the valley elderberry longhorn beetle (Desmocerus californicus dimorphus) from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife under the 1 Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended. This withdrawal is based on our determination that the proposed rule did not fully analyze the best available information. We find the best scientific and commercial data available indicate that the threats to the species and its habitat have not been reduced to the point where the species no longer meets the statutory definition of an endangered or threatened species. DATES: The Service is withdrawing the proposed rule published October 2, 2012 (77 FR 60238) as of [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: The withdrawal of our proposed rule, comments and materials we received, and supplementary documents are available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov at Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0063. All comments, materials, and supporting documentation that we considered in this final agency action are available by appointment, during normal business hours, at: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W–2605, Sacramento, California 95825; telephone 916–414–6600; or facsimile 916–414–6713.
    [Show full text]