A Festschrift in Honour of Prof. Irving I. Gottesman June 8–9, 2001, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Festschrift in Honour of Prof. Irving I. Gottesman June 8–9, 2001, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA NEWS, VIEWS AND COMMENTS Behaviour Genetic Principles — Development, Personality, and Psychopathology: A Festschrift in Honour of Prof. Irving I. Gottesman June 8–9, 2001, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN, USA Reflections: An Interview with Professor Irving I. Gottesman on the Occasion of His Festschrift Nancy L. Segal Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, USA Even more compelling than Dr. went on to study behavioral correlates How shall we view the life work of Gottesman’s professional achievements of low birth weight in young twins; Professor Irving I. Gottesman on the are his reflections on where he has taken Myrianthopoulus et al., 1972.). eve of his retirement? How shall we twin research and where twin research Gottesman’s adolescent twin analysis of judge his contributions to twin research has taken him. These thoughts, shared personality, using the MMPI, was the at the juncture of genetics, develop- with me on the occasion of his June, first such American study since ment, personality and psychopathology? 2001 Festschrift at the University of Newman, Freeman and Holzinger’s One way is to review Dr. Gottesman’s Minnesota, add depth and meaning to classic 1937 study of 19 reared apart curriculum vitae that boasts 16 ongoing his many lectures and publications. MZ twin sets (Newman et al., 1937). research collaborations (“[list] not com- Reproducing Dr. Gottesman’s words in I wondered if there were favorites plete”!), 19 books and monographs, 181 Twin Research will, hopefully, preserve among the many twin studies Prof. articles, 76 book chapters and 23 book them as part of his invaluable legacy to Gottesman had conducted over the reviews. Most, if not all twin investiga- International Twin Society members years. I was not surprised to learn that tors, would note his seminal work, and to twin researchers everywhere. he “loves all his twin studies,” but that Schizophrenia and Genetics: A Twin How did Gottesman first become the highlight remains the Gottesman involved in twin research? Smiling, he and Shields collaboration that began in Study Vantage Point, co-authored with admitted that he had “no idea he was 1964. “We were able to do research in a James Shields (Gottesman & Shields, starting an avalanche of twin studies by treasure trove.” He explained that, in 1972). (This book is often known both psychologists and psychiatrists.” A 1948, Eliot Slater, at the MRC Unit in simply as “Gottesman and Shields,” University of Minnesota course in indi- Psychiatric Genetics, established a having attained stellar status in the vidual differences taught by James unique twin registry based on consecu- field). Others might recall that the Jenkins, introducing the twin studies of tively admitted psychiatric patients. common neuroscience terms “reaction psychoses by Franz Kallmann and Eliot Intake workers recorded whether these range”, “endophenotype” and epigenetic Slater, set him on his way — but the patients were members of a twin pair puzzle” derive from Gottesman and real triggers were the work and inspira- (Healy, 1998). Virtually all schizo- Shields’s adaptation of these terms from tion of Professor Sheldon Reed. Reed, a phrenic outpatients eventually become plant and animal genetics (Gottesman, former Drosophila geneticist, was inpatients given the debilitating nature unpublished biography). Still others involved in family studies of mental of the disorder. Gottesman and Shields would highlight his creative collabora- retardation when Gottesman enrolled in benefited from access to the “best tions with Aksel Bertelsen in Denmark, his human genetics class (Healy, 1998). sample for schizophrenic twin studies,” comparing risk for schizophrenia in “Sheldon was eager to capture a psy- amassed over a 16-year period. Upon children of disease-discordant monozy- chology student and I came at the right conclusion of their work, all twins had gotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins. time.” (Reed had recently mentored been hospitalized. Using these yardsticks would be well- twin-based dissertation research on There were two more twin research intentioned, even right, but not entirely multiple sclerosis by another notable in favorites, however. One was a tripartite to the point. the field, Ntinos Myrianthopolous, who event, involving Irving Gottesman, Twin Research Volume 4 Number 4 pp. 275–284 275 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 27 Sep 2021 at 05:50:51, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.4.4.275 Nancy L. Segal Aksel Bertelsen and Margit Fisher line of work to intelligence and person- Fuller Torrey and colleagues (Torrey et (Gottesman & Bertelsen, 1989). At ality seems farther in the future, al., 1994), will also commence. Finally, issue was the relative risk of schizo- although some pioneering efforts have together with graduate student Jim phrenic disorder among the offspring been made. Public health issues are Reilly, Gottesman will try to “add meat of disease-discordant MZ and DZ presently of greatest concern to him. to the bones” of what is a neurodevel- twins. The research logic flowed from Who in the world of twin studies opmental theory of schizophrenia that recognizing that the children of MZ has had the greatest impact on his accords proper weight to genetic ideas twins are genetically equivalent to half- thinking and his research activities? already in place. siblings, in addition to being legal first James (Jerry) Shields was the easy There is a certain symmetry to the cousins (Segal, 2000). Twin mothers answer. “He [Shields] knew the twins fact that this Sherrell J. Aston Professor and fathers in these special families themselves and he knew the methodol- of Psychology Emeritus from the assume the genetic equivalence of ogy.” Many people may be unaware University of Virginia is returning to “mothers” and “fathers” of their nieces that Shields interviewed all his reared the University of Minnesota, the and nephews who, in turn, become apart twins himself, despite eventual setting of his first twin study. In addi- their genetic “children.” These relation- confinement to a wheelchair due to tion to the research activities ships do not apply to DZ twin families polio. Gottesman told me he possesses mentioned above, Gottesman will whose members retain the same kinship a duplicate set of Shields’s precious team teach a research seminar in connections generated when ordinary research archive, an arrangement behavioral genetics with Profs. Thomas non-twin siblings marry. The results prompted by practical, as well as per- J. Bouchard, Jr. and Matt McGue, and were provocative: The children of sonal considerations: Behavioral spend one day each week in the affected and unaffected MZ co-twins genetic findings in general, and twin Psychiatry Department and one day were at similar risk for inheriting the research data in particular, have been each month at the Minneapolis schizophrenic predisposition (16.8% seriously challenged, occasionally Veterans Medical Center. He will con- and 17.4%, respectively). In contrast, attacked, by individuals indifferent to tinue his service as Chair of the Twins the children of affected and unaffected biological explanations of human Committee of the Institute of DZ co-twins were at dissimilar risk behavior. Access to original data files Medicine/National Research Council (17.4% and 2.1%, respectively). These allows new analyses that can counter and as board member of the IOM findings lead to the “fortifying notion old criticisms. It also offers opportuni- Medical Follow-Up Agency. He will, already common in plant and animal ties to test fresh ideas about behavior, despite his relocation to the midwest, genetics that organisms may carry as evidenced by a 1991 paper on reared retain a significant presence at the unexpressed genotypes.” apart twins weight and body mass University of Virginia due to endow- Gottesman’s final research favorite index, completed with Dr. Arlen Price ment of an eponymous lecture series. involved reconceptualization of co- (Price & Gottesman, 1991). Analyses When pressed to reflect upon his twins as “co-clones.” He saw twin of twins’ answers to original items thoughts at this celebration by friends research become more exciting in the included in early versions of Hans and colleagues, Gottesman revealed an wake of tools such as PET (positive Eysenck’s personality questionnaire inquisitive clinical side that has served emission spectometry) scans, MRI have never been attempted, but may be him well throughout his career. (He is, (magnetic resonance imaging) and undertaken in the future. in fact, a trained clinical psychologist other techniques for assessing genetic In recognition of his friend’s stun- with a doctoral degree from the expression. Such developments have ning contributions to twin research, University of Minnesota, awarded in lead Gottesman to turn again to the Gottesman established the James 1960, and an honorary fellow of the discordant twin design to apply these Shields Memorial Award for twin Royal College of Psychiatrists.) True to methods with exquisite genetic research in behavioral genetics. This fashion, his answer reached beyond the control. He is adamant that twin honor is accepted with great pride and obvious pleasure anyone would draw studies have not stood still following humility, given its association with so from such a gathering to tap a deeper introduction of these sophisticated distinguished
Recommended publications
  • Advances in Behavior Genetics
    Advances in Behavior Genetics Series Editor Yong-Kyu Kim More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/10458 Jonathan C. Gewirtz • Yong-Kyu Kim Editors Animal Models of Behavior Genetics Editors Jonathan C. Gewirtz Yong-Kyu Kim Department of Psychology Janelia Research Campus University of Minnesota Howard Hughes Medical Institue Minneapolis , MN , USA Ashburn , VA , USA Advances in Behavior Genetics ISBN 978-1-4939-3775-2 ISBN 978-1-4939-3777-6 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3777-6 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016938080 © Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specifi c statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • P S Y C H L I N K
    P s y c h L i n k Volume 7, Issue 2 The Newsletter of the Institute of Psychology Fall 2004 Contents From the Director - Dr. M. Ellen Mitchell From the Director 1 staff. Along with Jennifer made in undergraduate and Board Chairman 2 Walden, Sean helps to ensure graduate school are the smooth running of multiple powerful, even when we do Dr. Raju CD 2 facets of our operation. As not have frequent contact. Director of well, Anne Rose Johnson came However, this would Development 3 on board this month as our new necessitate an effort on the full time development person. A part of all of you to drop us Undergraduate Certified Fundraising Executive, a note so we can make you a Admissions 4 Anne has a wealth of experi- part of our news. Please Center for Research ence and energy to bring to also tell us about others & Service 5 The university in the fall is a sight to bear on the task of ensuring with whom you may be in I/O News 6 behold: new students, familiar faces, philanthropic support for touch ~ even second hand New Faculty 7 new faculty, old friends, crisp air psychology. We are very news can be good news. Rehab News 8 intermingled with boiling days, the pleased to welcome each and Sad news is also important hum of activity. This fall has been Clinical News 9 every one of them and hope news for us to receive. I particularly busy. We are pleased to you will make the effort to say received word that Anne 10 Alumni Spotlight welcome two new faculty to our hello and join in our welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Genetics Research and Criminal Dna Databases
    10__KAYE.DOC 9/8/2006 3:55 PM BEHAVIORAL GENETICS RESEARCH AND CRIMINAL DNA DATABASES D.H. KAYE* I INTRODUCTION DNA identification databases have made it possible to apprehend the perpetrators of crimes ranging from auto theft and petty burglary1 to serial rapes and murders.2 Yet the laws establishing these databases have been the subject of persistent litigation and repeated criticism. One recurrent refrain plays on the fear of research into genes and behavior. The public has been told that There are no limits on who uses [the tissue sample]. Even if [a law enforcement agency] decides they’re only going to use it for identification purposes, there’s no restriction on their turning it over to somebody else who will use it to look for a crime gene . .3 Other advocacy groups and individuals have trumpeted the prospect of research seeking a “crime gene”4 or have pointed to the sordid history of biological Copyright © 2006 by D.H. Kaye This article is also available at http://law.duke.edu/journals/lcp. * D.H. Kaye is Regents’ Professor and Fellow, Center for the Study of Law, Science, and Technology, Arizona State University. This work was funded in part by Department of Energy Grant No. DE-FG02-04ER63712. Versions of this paper were presented at a faculty seminar at the University of California at Davis School of Law and at the Conference on the Impact of Behavioral Genetics on Criminal Law hosted by Law and Contemporary Problems at Duke Law School. I am grateful to the participants in those events and to Ira Ellman, Jeffrey Murphy, James Nickels, and James Weinstein for discussions of several of the issues considered in this article, and to Paul Appelbaum, Irving Gottesman, and Mark Rothstein for comments on a draft of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • A Breath of Fresh Air
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2006) 14, 1145–1146 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1018-4813/06 $30.00 www.nature.com/ejhg familiar with genetic terminology. Chap- BOOK REVIEW ter references are indicated with an * or a diamond } depending on relevance and an excellent way to find a good reference A breath of fresh air quickly. ...................................... I enjoyed the miscellaneous section Respiratory Genetics most – covering rare diseases and syn- dromes. It is up to date and includes EK Silverman, SD Shapiro, DA Lomas, ST Weiss. Hodder Arnold, 2005. discussion of causes of hereditary and ........... sporadic pneumothorax including certain Patrick J Morrison mutations in Birt-Hogg-Dube´ syndrome – ......................................................................... something that was not really recognised until recently. European Journal of Human Genetics (2006) 14, 1145 . There are only six colour plates – doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201672 disappointing in a book of this size but overall, this is a great book for respiratory and interested general physicians. General his is an excellent new textbook to carry out a good Pub Med search, and a clinical geneticists will find it useful to on respiratory genetics – an area succinct guide to SNPs and microarrays. have a copy in the library for reference, that has suddenly emerged over Other chapters cover pharmacokinetics and may find their laboratory colleagues T the last decade. and functional genomics. having a look at the more clinical sec- It is well written and divided into four Parts 2–4 cover three clinical respira- tions. This book should become the clear sections: tory disease sections – Part 2 covers standard reference text in this area’ Part 1 deals with key concepts in obstructive lung disease – asthma, chronic respiratory genetics – this section is tar- pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis are Patrick J Morrison is a Professor in the geted at nongeneticists and will not be of covered comprehensively.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature-Nurture Controversy: a Dialectical Essay
    VOLUME 6 1 Cognitive Critique THE NATURE-NURTURE CONTROVERSY: A DIALECTICAL ESSAY MATT MCGUE Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis, Minnesota Institute of Public Health University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark EMAIL: [email protected] IRVING I. GOTTESMAN Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota EMAIL: [email protected] Accepted September 29, 2012 KEYWORDS behavior genetics, endophenotype, environmentalist, epigenetics, eugenics, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), hereditarian, heritability, monozygotic and dizygotic twins, systems approach ABSTRACT For millennia, scholars, philosophers and poets have speculated on the origins of individual differences in behavior, and especially the extent to which these differences owe to inborn natural factors (nature) versus life circumstances (nurture). The modern form of the nature-nurture debate took shape in the late 19th century when, based on his empirical studies, Sir Francis Galton concluded that 2 THE NATURE - NURTURE CONTROVERSY nature prevails enormously over nurture. However, Galton’s inter- est in eugenics undermined early research into the genetic origins of behavior, which did not re-emerge until the latter half of the 20th century when behavioral geneticists started to publish their findings from twin and adoption studies. Current consensus is that the nature versus nurture debate represents a false dichotomy, and that to prog- ress beyond this fallacy will require the investigation of how both genetic and environmental factors combine to affect the biological systems that underlie behavioral phenotypes. As a word by itself, nature is simply a proxy for the terms ge- netics or heredity. Nurture by itself is simply a proxy for the terms environment or experience, broadly construed.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Irving I. Gottesman
    Twin Research and Human Genetics Volume 19 Number 6 pp. 708–714 C The Author(s) 2016 doi:10.1017/thg.2016.87 NEWS, VIEWS AND COMMENTS Remembering Irving I. Gottesman: Twin Research Colleague and Friend Extraordinaire/Research Studies: Face-Lift Technique Comparison in Identical Twins; Raising Preterm Twins; Fetal Behavior in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies; Co-Bedding and Stress Reduction in Twins/Public Interest: Identical Co-Twins’ Same Day Delivery; Teaching Twins in Bosnia; Twin Auctioneers; Sister, the Play Nancy L. Segal Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA Dr Irving I. Gottesman, a colleague, friend, and long-time member of the International Society of Twin Studies passed away on June 29, 2016. His contributions to twin research and some personal reflections are presented to honor both the man and the memory. This tribute is followed by short reviews of twin research concerning differences between cosmetic surgical techniques, the rearing of preterm twins, behavioral observations of dichorionic fetal twins, and the outcomes of co-bedding twins with reference to stress reduction. Interesting and informative articles in the media describe identical co-twins who delivered infants on the same day, educational policies regarding twins in Bosnia and the United Kingdom, unusual practices of twin auctioneers, and a theatrical production, Sister, featuring identical twins in the leading roles. ............................................ Remembering Irving I. Gottesman: Twin Research Colleague and Friend Extraordinaire Irving I. Gottesman retired in about 2001, but the ex- Southern Illinois. Irv’s knowledge, insight, and influence actdateisdifficulttodetermine.Thatisbecauseseveral were far-reaching and continue to be – even now. festschrifts were held in his honor, organized by different academic institutions, and chaired by various colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • Symposium in Honor of Irving I. Gottesman (December 29, 1930–June 29, 2016)
    Twin Research and Human Genetics Volume 21 Number 4 pp. 281–284 C The Author(s) 2018 doi:10.1017/thg.2018.29 Symposium in Honor of Irving I. Gottesman (December 29, 1930–June 29, 2016) Nancy L. Segal Psychology Department, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA The June 2016 death of our esteemed colleague, Dr Irving I. Gottesman, was felt as an extreme loss at so many levels by colleagues, students, friends, and family across the globe. Irv’s stellar contributions to the field of twin research will continue to be remembered and cited for many years to come. In commemoration of his life and work, I organized a symposium at the 16th meeting of the International Society for Twin Studies, held in Madrid, Spain, November 16–18, 2017. The panelists included mostly former students, as well as colleagues, who presented their scientific research and personal remarks reflecting Irv’s profound influence in shaping their lives and careers. A chronology of Irv’s academic positions and honors isincluded in the introduction to this special issue of Twin Research and Human Genetics, followed by brief sketches of the panel participants; their scholarly papers and personal reflections follow. Keywords: Irving I. Gottesman, symposium, twin research, psychiatric genetics, personality There was no better venue than the 2017 International Department of Psychology; Professor of Clinical Pe- Twin Congress to recognize the contributions of Dr Irving diatrics (Medical Genetics), University of Virginia, Isadore Gottesman to twin research, as well as his lasting Charlottesville influence on countless colleagues and students. Many peo- 1987–1988: Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California ple could have been members of the symposium organized 1980–1985: Professor of Psychiatric Genetics, Wash- in his honor because Irv’s influence was far reaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Doi: 10.11606/9786587596167
    DOI: 10.11606/9786587596167 This book is made available under Creative Commons license to allow others to freely access, copy and use provided the authors are correctly attributed. Universidade de São Paulo Reitor – Prof. Dr. Vahan Agopyan Vice-Reitor – Prof. Dr. Antonio Carlos Hernandes Pró-Reitor de Pesquisa – Prof. Dr. Sylvio Roberto Accioly Canuto Pró-Reitor de Pós-Graduação – Prof. Dr. Carlos Gilberto Carlotti Júnior Pró-Reitor de Pós-Graduação – Prof. Dr. Edmund Chada Baracat Pró-Reitora de Cultura e Extensão Universitária – Profa. Dra. Maria Aparecida de Andrade Moreira Machado Instituto de Psicologia Diretora – Profa. Dra. Ana Maria Loffredo Vice-Diretor – Prof. Dr. Gustavo Martineli Massola Departamento de Psicologia Experimental Chefe – Prof. Dr. Marcelo Fernandes Da Costa Vice-Chefe – Prof. Dr. Marcelo Frota Lobato Benvenuti Organizing Committee of the Twin Studies in Behavioral and Health Research: Current Status, Prospects and Applications Profa. Dra. Emma Otta (IPUSP) Profa. Dra. Patrícia Ferreira Monticelli (FFCLRP) Prof. Dr. Claudio Possani (IME-USP) Dra. Tania Kiehl Lucci (IPUSP) Dr. Ricardo Prist (IPUSP) Cover Photo: Tomaz Maranhão Book formatting: Sofia Barbosa Lima English Editing Services: Michael Germain and Lisa Burger, MC TRADUÇÕES S/S LTDA Apoio: Catalogação na publicação Serviço de Biblioteca e Documentação Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo Twin studies in behavioral and health research: current status, prospects and aplications / Organized by Emma Otta e Tania Kiehl Lucci -- São Paulo, Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo, 2021. 170 p. ISBN: 978-65-87596-16-7 DOI: 10.11606/9786587596167 1. Gêmeos. 2. Pesquisa comportamental. 3. Pesquisa em saúde. I. Otta, E., ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Twins Reared Together and Apart: the Science Behind the Fascination1
    Twins Reared Together and Apart: The Science Behind the Fascination1 NANCY L. SEGAL Professor of Psychology and Director Twin Studies Center California State University, Fullerton he reasons behind the widespread interest in twins are fascinating to consider. There is no question that people are intrigued by T twins—wherever I go I am asked about my work by both profes- sionals and non-professionals. I often ask them, “Why do you care about this topic?” Most of them reply, “Well, it is just so interesting,” but no one can provide a more substantive answer. I have thought a great deal about this question. I believe that twins are fascinating because we expect and anticipate individual differences in behavior and appearance. There- fore, when we encounter two people who look so much alike and act so much alike, it becomes intriguing because it challenges our beliefs in the way the world works. For some people, this may be disturbing, but for many, it is quite compelling. There are also many misunderstandings surrounding the origins of twinning and twin development. I address some of them in this paper and many others in my new book Twin Mythconceptions (Segal, 2017). Two Twin Types The study of twins rests on the availability of two types of twins. Identical, or monozygotic (MZ), twins share all of their genes in common, having split from a single fertilized egg between the first and fourteenth post-conceptional day (Segal, 2000). Fraternal, or dizygotic (DZ), twins result from the fertilization of two separate eggs by two separate sperm and share 50% of their genes, on average, by descent, just like full siblings.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Two Invalidating Aspects of the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart (MISTRA)
    Twenty-Two Invalidating Aspects of the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart (MISTRA) (FULL VERSION) By Jay Joseph, Psy.D. November, 2018 Author e-mail: [email protected] Twenty-Two Invalidating Aspects of the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart (MISTRA) (FULL VERSION) © 2018 by Jay Joseph, Psy.D. Table of Contents Summary Abbreviations The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart Impact of the Study ......................................................................................................................................... 2 MZA, MZT, and DZA Pairs .............................................................................................................................. 3 Important Terms and Concepts ................................................................................................................... 3 TRA Studies and the Twin Method .............................................................................................................. 4 The Famous MISTRA Science Article .......................................................................................................... 5 MISTRA “Model Fitting” Analyses ............................................................................................................... 7 DZA Pairs as the MISTRA Designated Control Group ............................................................................ 8 How the Researchers Concluded That Genetic Factors Play an Important Role ........................... 9 The Disappearing DZA Group IQ Correlations ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Society of Clinical Psychology (Division 12, American Psychological Association)
    VOL 60 Issue 3 FALL 2007 A Publication of the Society of Clinical Psychology (Division 12, American Psychological Association) CONTENTS SPECIAL INSIDE: 2007 Call for Nominations (see page 14) 01 President’s Column 05 Internet Update: Mailing List Pet Peeves 08 Early Career: PRESIDENT’S COLUMN (Super) Vision Quest 09 Diversity: The Effects of From the Academy to the Community: Domestic Violence on Disseminating Evidence-Based Treatments. Children of Color (Part II) Marsha M. Linehan, PhD, ABPP 11 History: The Division of Clinical Psychology, 1985-95 A colleague of mine received her NIMH review on a grant pro- 12 Student Column: posal she submitted. The focus of the proposal was to develop Interdisciplinary Research programs for disseminating evidence-based treatments for anxiety Institutes Free your Time disorders. One of the critiques suggested that the study is unimportant and your Mind! 14 Federal Advocacy Column: Marsha M. Linehan, because disseminating evidence-based treatments is useless: therapists Political Outreach Ph.D., ABPP will not use them. I was, as readers of my previous columns might sur- 14 2007 Call for Nominations University of Washington mise, shocked. In helping my colleague craft a response I suggested she President, Society of 15 Psychopharm Update: point out that the same argument can be made about research aimed Addressing Troubling Clinical Psychology Issues in Child at developing effective treatments. Why bother? and Adolescent Reading the Sunday New York Times several weeks ago, I realized that difficulties dis- Psychopharmacology: seminating evidence-based treatments are not confined to the treatment of mental disorders. A Call for Ideas In a saga detailed in The New York Times, a woman with cancer was pronounced as having six 17 Book Recommendations months to live by her first oncologists and subsequent treatment recommendations depended 18 Section Updates 21 Abbreviated Minutes on who the oncologist was.
    [Show full text]
  • Srcd Oral History Interview
    Sandra Scarr Born 08/08/1936 in Washington, DC Spouse – Harry Scarr (divorced in 1972), Philip Salapatek Ph.D. and A.M. from Harvard University (1965 and 1963); A.B. from Vassar College (1958) Major Employment: NIMH Laboratory of Socio-Environmental Studies - 1959-1960, Research Assistant University of Minnesota – 1971-1977, Psychology Yale University – 1977-1983, Psychology University of Virginia – 1984-1996, Psychology Major Areas of Work: Behavioral Genetics, Study of Identical/Fraternal Twins, Daycare SRCD Affiliation: Editorial Board Involvement: Child Development (1974-1976), Monographs of the SRCD (1973); Governing Council Member (1977-1983); President (1989-1991) SRCD ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEW Sandra Scarr Interviewed by Rich Weinberg In Montgomery, Alabama June 21, 1996 Weinberg: Hello, this is Rich Weinberg, Director of the Institute of Child Development at the University of Minnesota, and it's going to be my pleasure to gather the Oral History of Sandra Scarr who has served as President of SRCD. We're in her home in Montgomery, Alabama where she is currently the CEO of KinderCare Incorporated, Sandra? Scarr: Chairman and CEO, KinderCare Learning Centers, Incorporated. Weinberg: Okay. And while we're getting started here, Sandra, in fact, is watering her plants. And I think we'll find when we get into some of her personal interests that that is one of the continuities over many years in her life. We're in an environment where we are surrounded by magnificent plants that Sandra has tended in the same way that she's tended to so many other things in her life. Good morning Sandy. Scarr: Good morning.
    [Show full text]