DOCSLIB.ORG

2018 Joint SSO and RTA Workshop

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2018 Joint SSO and RTA Workshop 2018 Joint SSO and RTA Workshop Introduction of Attendees Dr.Alfonz Ruth Office of Administration Federal Transit Administration October 23, 2018 ARIZONA Arizona Department of Transportation Valley Metro Valley Metro Rail Light Rail City of Tucson Sun Link Streetcar 2 ARKANSAS Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department Rock Region Metro Metro Streetcar Streetcar 3 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Rail Light Rail Heavy Rail North County Transit District SPRINTER Light Rail Sacramento Regional Transit District Regional Transit Light Rail San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Trolley Light Rail Continued on Next Page 4 CALIFORNIA California Public Utilities Commission Continued…. Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Heavy Rail BART to Oakland Automated Guideway San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Muni Metro Light Rail Cable Car Streetcar Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Light Rail 5 COLORADO Colorado Public Utilities Commission Regional Transportation District RTD Rail Light Rail 6 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D.C. Fire and Emergency Management Services D.C. Department of Transportation DC Streetcar Streetcar 7 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARYLAND VIRGINIA Tri-State Oversight Committee (Metrorail Safety Commission) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Metrorail Heavy Rail 8 FLORIDA Florida Department of Transportation Miami-Dade Transit Metro Rail Metromover Heavy Rail Automated guideway – People mover Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority TECO Line Streetcar System Streetcar Jacksonville Transportation Authority Jacksonville Skyway Automated guideway – People mover The Wave Streetcar 9 GEORGIA Georgia Department of Transportation Metropolitan Atlanta Regional Transit Authority MARTA Rail System Heavy Rail City of Atlanta Atlanta Streetcar Streetcar 10 HAWAII Hawaii Department of Transportation Honolulu Authority for Rapid Transportation Honolulu Rail Transit Heavy Rail 11 ILLINOIS Illinois Department of Transportation Chicago Transit Authority Chicago L Heavy Rail Bi-State Development Agency (Illinois & Missouri) MetroLink Light Rail 12 LOUISIANA Louisiana Department of Transportation New Orleans Regional Transit Authority RTA Streetcar 13 MARYLAND Maryland Department of Transportation Maryland Transit Administration Metro Subway & Light Rail Heavy Rail Light Rail 14 MASSACHUSETTS Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority The T Heavy Rail Light Rail 15 MICHIGAN Michigan Department of Transportation Detroit Transportation Corporation Detroit People Mover Automated Guideway M-1 Rail QLine (formally known as Woodward Avenue Streetcar) Streetcar 16 MINNESOTA Minnesota Department of Public Safety Metro Transit METRO Light Rail 17 MISSOURI Missouri Department of Transportation Kansas City Streetcar Authority KC Streetcar Streetcar Bi-State Development Agency (Missouri & Illinois) MetroLink Light Rail Loop Trolley Transportation Development District The Loop Trolley (also known as the Delmar Loop Trolley) Streetcar 18 NEW JERSEY New Jersey Department of Transportation New Jersey Transit Hudson-Bergen Light Rail Newark Light Rail Riverline Light Rail Port Authority Transit Corporation (New Jersey & Pennsylvania) PATCO Speedline Heavy Rail 19 NEW YORK New York Public Transportation Safety Board Niagara Frontier Transportation Authority Metro Rail Light Rail New York City Transit Authority New York City Subway Heavy Rail 20 NORTH CAROLINA North Carolina Department of Transportation Charlotte Area Transit System LYNX Rapid Transit Services - Blue Line Light Rail City LYNX - Gold Line Streetcar 21 OHIO Ohio Department of Transportation Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority Cincinnati Bell Connector Streetcar Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority RTA Rapid Transit Light Rail Heavy Rail 22 OKLAHOMA Oklahoma Department of Transportation City of Oklahoma City Oklahoma City Streetcar (also known as MAPS 3 Streetcar) Streetcar 23 OREGON Oregon Department of Transportation TriMet MAX Light Rail Portland Streetcar, Inc. Portland Streetcar Streetcar 24 PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Southeast Pennsylvania Transportation Authority SEPTA Heavy Rail Light Rail Streetcar Port Authority of Allegheny County The T Light Rail Cambria County Transit Authority Cam Tran Johnstown Inclined Plane 25 PUERTO RICO Puerto Rico Emergency Management Agency Puerto Rico Department of Transportation and Public Works (Departamento de Transportación y Obras Públicas) Tren Urbano Heavy Rail 26 TENNESSEE Tennessee Department of Transportation Memphis Area Transit Authority MATA Trolley Streetcar Chattanooga Area Regional Transportation Authority Lookout Mountain Incline Railway Incline Plane 27 TEXAS Texas Department of Transportation Dallas Area Rapid Transit DART Light Rail Light Rail City of Dallas Dallas Streetcar Streetcar Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas METRO Light Rail McKinney Avenue Transit Authority McKinney Avenue Transit Authority (MATA) Streetcar 28 UTAH Utah Department of Transportation Utah Transit Authority TRAX Light Rail S-Line Streetcar 29 VIRGINIA Virginia Department of Rail and Public Transportation Hampton Roads Transit Tide Light Rail Light Rail 30 WASHINGTON Washington State Department of Transportation Sound Transit Link Light Rail – Central Link Light Rail Sound Transit Link Light Rail – Tacoma Link Light Rail City of Seattle Seattle Streetcar Network (First Hill Streetcar & South Lake Union Streetcar) Streetcar Seattle Center Monorail Monorail 31 WEST VIRGINIA West Virginia Department of Transportation West Virginia University Morgantown Personal Rapid Transit Automated Guideway 32 WISCONSIN Wisconsin Department of Transportation Kenosha Area Transit Kenosha Streetcar Streetcar City of Milwaukee Milwaukee Streetcar Streetcar 33 US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Transit Administration 2018 Joint SSO and RTA Workshop 34.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dover Nj to Penn Station Train Schedule
    Dover Nj To Penn Station Train Schedule Courtney tickles goofily as diminuendo Farley snatch her Elohim sparkles irreparably. Spousal Odell thigging scantly, he Americanizing his pinhole very unashamedly. Sometimes bothered Ignazio depersonalized her saplessness testily, but earthier Worth rebraced sparely or amplifies troublesomely. Ledger, find Bergen County real estate listings and senior about local pond on NJ. Only new users can earn points through a referral. Good reason why share write a roundtrip train companies sell or penn station? Buses are choreographed to penn station is designed to do? CEO of Wanderu, as notice as later office instigator of celebratory vodka shots. Customers are strongly encouraged to sign up know My Transit alerts and activate push notifications on the mobile app to rumor the latest status of value system, NJ Transit said allow a release. Traveling by nj transit schedule except with fantastic fly ticket. This improve my hire time using Wanderu, pleasantly surprised! New jersey motorcycle helmet law enforcement of nj transit numbers used to dover can go around your trips. Five NJ TRANSIT rail lines serve Penn Station New York. In image to judge you with key best quality of ticket system map online, we will provided detailed Maps by Community in addition consider the splash System Map. Restaurants in an essential role in essex and this station to dover nj penn station due to get access is no parking at no. The NJ Transit will take occasion to Manhattan to Penn Station. Get schedules schedule information is dover, check travel by following one scheduled train tour of penn station in completing your commute or www.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Project Delivery CBT Transcript
    NEPA Introduction Course: Transit Project Delivery Welcome to the National Environmental Policy Act also known as NEPA Introduction Course on Transit Project Delivery provided by the Florida Department of Transportation’s or FDOT’s Office of Environmental Management, as covered in Part 1, Chapter 14 of the Project Development and Environment (or PD&E) Manual. This course provides an overview of the transit project delivery process, agency roles in the environmental review process, an overview of FDOT’s five-step process, which includes planning and community support, concept development and alternatives screening, PD&E study phases, and the Federal Transit Administration’s, or FTA’s, funding programs. Lesson 1 provides an overview of transit projects and NEPA, including definitions used for transit projects, an introduction to the FTA, and a comparison of how NEPA is conducted for FTA versus the Federal Highway Administration, or FHWA. If a federal action is required or federal funding is being used, the project must comply with NEPA and other applicable environmental laws and regulations, including those related to historic preservation and protection of public lands. FTA is typically the lead agency for transit projects, when FTA funding is being used to construct the project or purchase vehicles. Other agencies may be involved in the NEPA process, such as Federal Highway Administration, or FHWA, if the project involves an interstate facility or bridge, or the Federal Railroad Administration or FRA, if the project involves a freight or passenger railroad corridor, such as Amtrak. FTA has its own procedures for NEPA compliance, including requiring the NEPA or project development phase to be completed within two years for certain funding programs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Certification Review Report
    Transportation Management Area Planning Certification Review Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration St. Louis Transportation Management Area April 14, 2017 Summary Report Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Disposition of FY 2013 Certification Review Corrective Action and Recommendations..5 1.2 Summary of FY 2017 Findings .......................................................................................... 5 2.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Purpose and Objective ................................................................................................... 11 3.0 SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................. 12 3.1 Review Process ............................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Documents Reviewed ..................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Input from the Public, Officials, and Member Agencies Staffs ......................................... 13 4.0 PROGRAM REVIEW ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Innovation. Technology. Performance. for the URBAN RAIL COMMUNITY
    Smart cities Tram-trains Ticketing Power Traction CBTC Train control Technology Mobility Telecommunications Innovation Innovation. Driverless Infrastructure Passenger Information Asset management FOR THE URBAN RAIL COMMUNITY Technology. Performance. www.terrapinn.com/railliveamericas Organized by Our Story Hall of Fame Revamped for the new year, RAIL Live! Americas 2019 is moving to Baltimore’s Inner Harbor as we build on the success of World MetroRail Congress Americas 2018, which continued our strong tradition of bringing together top leaders from the Americas’ most influential and innovative transit agencies. Andy Byford Jim Kenney 2018 leaders included Kevin Desmond, CEO of TransLink, Edward Reiskin, President Mayor Director of Transportation for the SFMTA, Jim Kenney, Mayor, City of Philadelphia New York City Transit City of Philadelphia Tom Gerend, Executive Director of KC Streetcar, Robert Puentes, President & CEO of the Eno Center for Transportation, Martin Buck, International Lead for Crossrail in London, and Lorenzo Aguilar Camelo, the General Director of Metrorrey in Monterrey, Mexico. KEY INDUSTRY DISCUSSIONS FOR 2019 WILL BE DIVIDED INTO FOUR Jascha Franklin-Hodge Bill Zebrowski Chief Information Officer BRAND NEW TRACKS: Chief Information Officer Department of Innovation & SEPTA • The Future of Mobility: Discussions around Mobility as a Service, Fare Collection, Technology, City of Boston Intermodality, Ridership, Passenger Information Systems, and First and Last Mile transport. • New Project Development: Examining Funding and Financing, Public-Private Partnerships, Procurement, Designing and Building New Metros, Light Rails, Commuter, and High-Speed Rail Lines. Meera Joshi Adam Giambrone NYC Taxi and Limousine Director, Brooklyn-Queens • Train Control: Covering ATC, CBTC, PTC, as well as the Full Spectrum of Commission Connector [Streetcars and LRT] Modernizing Signaling and Train Control Systems to Increase Safety and Capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Kapālama Canal Catalytic Project
    KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT OCTOBER 2016 2 • EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT Prepared by : with assistance from: KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 • 3 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background and Location 4 2 Site Analysis 2.1 General Observations 6 2.2 Nimitz Highway to Dillingham Boulevard 10 2.3 Dillingham Boulevard to North King Street 12 2.4 North King Street to the H-1 Freeway 15 2.5 The H-1 Freeway to Houghtailing Street 17 2.6 Bridges 18 2.7 Architecturally Significant Structures 20 3 Civil Study Areas 3.1 Flood Capacity and Channel Design 22 3.2 Utilities 23 3.3 Stormwater Runoff and Drainage 25 3.4 Water Quality and Pollutant Sources 26 3.5 Canal Management and Maintenance 26 3.6 Tides 27 3.7 Sea Level Rise and Climate Change 27 3.8 Bathymetric and Topographic Surveys 28 3.9 Design Standards 28 3.10 Ecology & Marine Resources 29 4 Related Planning Studies 4.1 Primary Urban Center Development Plan for 2025 30 4.2 Kalihi-Palāma Action Plan 31 4.3 Kalihi Neighborhood Transit-Oriented Development Plan 33 4.4 Kapālama Canal: A Conceptual Plan Study 36 5 Jurisdiction, Land Ownership, and Regulations 5.1 Jurisdiction 37 5.2 Landowners 37 5.3 Landowner Development Plans 38 5.4 Revised Ordinances of Honolulu 39 5.5 Chapter 343 Hawai‘i Revised Statutes 40 5.6 Land Use Considerations 41 5.7 Other Required Permits/Regulatory Approvals 42 6 Community Design 43 7 References 46 7.1 Civil References 47 Appendix A : Cultural and Historical Brief A-1 Appendix B : Community Stakeholders B-1 Appendix C : Geotechnical Work Plan C-1 4 • EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - OCTOBER 2016 KAPĀLAMA CANAL CATALYTIC PROJECT 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Background & Location The Kapālama Canal Catalytic Project is based on various community plans supported by the City & County of Honolulu.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What Is the MUTCD?
    National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Bus/BRT Applications Introduction • I am Steve Andrle from TRB standing in for Randy McCourt, DKS Associates and 2019 ITE International Vice President • I co-manage with Claire Randall15 TRB public transit standing committees. • I want to bring you up to date on planned bus- oriented improvements to the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) What is the MUTCD? • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) – Standards for roadway signs, signals, and markings • Authorized in 23 CFR, Part 655: It is an FHWA document. • National Committee on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (NCUTCD) develops content • Sponsored by 19 organizations including ITE, AASHTO, APTA and ATSSA (American Traffic Safety Services Association) Background • Bus rapid transit, busways, and other bus applications have expanded greatly since the last edition of the MUTCD in 2009 • The bus-related sections need to be updated • Much of the available research speaks to proposed systems, not actual experience • The NCUTCD felt it was a good time to survey actual systems to see what has worked, what didn’t work, and to identify gaps. National Survey • The NCUTCD established a task force with APTA and FTA • Working together they issued a survey in April of 2018. I am sure some of you received it. • The results will be released to the NCUTCD on June 20 – effectively now • I cannot give you any details until the NCUTCD releases the findings Survey Questions • Have you participated in design and/or operations of
    [Show full text]
  • City Response to DART Downtown Transit Study
    Oak Cliff Gateway Community Meeting TIGER Streetcar Project Update Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects TIGER Streetcar Project Initial Dallas streetcar planning efforts grew out of CBD Comprehensive Transportation Plan and D2 light rail analysis Focused within downtown loop NCTCOG received a grant on behalf of the City of Dallas from the Federal Transit Administration for the streetcar starter line to serve the CBD and North Oak Cliff workforce The 1.6 mile base project runs from Union Station to Methodist Hospital at a cost of approximately $48.6M including vehicles $26M in federal funding $12.8M in local funding (Regional Toll-road Revenue) $9M from DART for vehicles 2 TIGER Streetcar Project 3 TIGER Streetcar Project Stacey and Witbeck/Carcon were given notice to proceed with final design and construction in September 2012 and bridge demolition is currently underway Base project has been enhanced to provide double track operation along Zang and Colorado Completion of base project is scheduled for October 2014 Brookville Equipment Corporation was given notice to proceed with production of two vehicles in March 2013 First American made off-wire modern streetcar vehicle The Dallas streetcar will be 8’ wide, 66.5’ long with capacity to carry 41 passenger seated and maximum 170 standees Anticipated vehicle delivery is late summer 2014 4 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension The Regional Transportation Council (RTC) recently reprogrammed $30.87M in Texas Mobility Funds to the Dallas Streetcar Project The funds are proposed to extend the base project an additional 1.25 miles and provide two additional vehicles .75 miles south from Methodist Hospital to the Bishop Arts District ($15M) .5 miles north to the Dallas Convention Center/Omni Hotel ($7.87M) Streetcar Vehicles ($8M) 5 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension 6 TIGER Streetcar Project Extension Operation and Maintenance Cost Operation for base Streetcar Project funded by Dallas Area Rapid Transit Base project assumes weekday service only 5:00 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenosha County on the Movex
    Kenosha County on the Move Beyond the KRM On June 15th, 2010 the Legislative Committee of the Kenosha County Board heard citizen comments on resolution number 8 submitted by Supervisor Erin Decker. Supervisor Decker’s resolution called for a county wide ballot referendum about the Kenosha Racine Milwaukee commuter rail line (KRM). Resolution 8 comes as a response to three bills that have been considered by the Wisconsin State Legislature, Senate Bill 205 (SB-205)/Assembly Bill 282 (AB-282), Assembly Bill 723 (AB-723)/Senate Bill 511 (SB- 511) and Assembly Bill 75 (AB-75). All three bills deal with Regional Transportation Authorities (RTA) and specifically the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Transportation Authority (SERTA). AB-75 passed the legislature. After hearing citizens comments at the Legislative Committee meeting it became quite clear that not enough information has been disseminated both to locally elected officials and citizens. The disparity between the amount of information and its distribution needed a deeper inquiry as to what information was used to create SB-205/AB-282, AB-723/ SB-511, and AB-75. This inquiry revealed that strict focus on the taxation of the KRM prevented full discussion at the legislative committee meeting of the issues underlying the three bills moving through the legislature. This brief address questions raised by citizens during the citizen comments portion of the June 15th meeting of the Legislative Committee, and it addresses items that surfaced throughout the crafting of AB- 282/SB-205, AB-723/SB-511,
    [Show full text]
  • Sunrail.Com Not to Scale
    WELCOME ABOARD! BROCHURE LYMMO is your ride to great places M around Downtown Orlando. Whether you’re heading to work, a meal, or one of the many attractions Downtown, LYMMO’s frequent service and bus-only lanes will get you there faster. LYNX is the public transit provider for LYMMO Orange, Lime and And when you’re riding LYMMO, you Orange, Osceola and Seminole counties. never have to worry about parking. Additional connectivity with Grapefruit Lines If you don’t see your destination here, Lake and Polk counties. CONTACT US and we can connect you DIRECT SERVICE TO: to the right LYMMO. CONTACT US for information on fares, bus stops, schedules and trip planning: Amway Center Heritage Square Ready to roll? Look inside for more info... Bob Carr Theater Lake Eola Park 407-841-5969 phone County Courthouse LYNX Central Station 407-423-0787 tdd County Health Dept Orlando City Stadium Dr Phillips Center Parramore Notice of Title VI Rights: LYNX operates its programs and services without regard to race, color, golynx.com web religion, gender, age, national origin, disability, or family status in accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. Any person who believes Effective: he or she has been aggrieved by any unlawful discriminatory practice APRIL 2017 related to Title VI may file a complaint in writing to LYNX Title VI Officer Desna Hunte, 455 N. Garland Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801 or by calling THANK YOU FOR RIDING LYNX! 407-254-6117, email [email protected] or www.golynx.com. Information in other languages or accessible formats available upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • Fy 2018 Business Plan
    Dallas Area Rapid Transit FY 2018 BUSINESS PLAN Including FY 2018 Annual Budget and Twenty-Year Financial Plan FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 1 7/31/17 9:40 AM DART BOARD MEMBERS Sue Bauman Dallas Catherine Cuellar Dallas and Cockrell Hill Mark C. Enoch Garland, Rowlett and Glenn Heights Tim A. Hayden Carrollton and Irving Ray Jackson Dallas Jonathan R. Kelly Garland Patrick Kennedy Dallas Jon-Bertrell Killen Dallas Michele Wong Krause Dallas Amanda Moreno Dallas Gary Slagel Richardson, University Park, Addison and Highland Park Rick Stopfer Irving Dominique Torres Dallas Paul N. Wageman Plano Faye Moses Wilkins Plano and Farmers Branch FY 2018 Business Plan L4.indd 2 7/31/17 9:40 AM FY 2018 Business Plan (09/26/17) How to Use This Book What’s in this Book This book contains the Business Plan for Fiscal Year 2018 (FY 2018 – which ends September 30, 2018) for Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART or the Agency). The Business Plan provides the DART Board of Directors, customers, taxpayers, elected officials, and other stakeholder groups of our region with a comprehensive summary of the Agency's plans and commitments to improve regional mobility, enhance the quality of life, and stimulate economic development. This document consolidates the key elements of the FY 2018 Annual Budget, the FY 2018 Twenty-Year Financial Plan, the Transit System Plan, and the Agency's Strategic Plan. A summary of the information contained in the various sections follows. The formal Letter of Transmittal summarizes priorities and issues for the upcoming year. The section titled Who We Are should help those not familiar with DART to understand the basis from which the Agency operates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc
    ERA BULLETIN — MARCH, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 3 March, 2020 The Bulletin R-42S MAKE THEIR FINAL, FINAL RUN Published by the Electric Railroaders’ Association, Inc. P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeffrey Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ronald Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2019 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: Second Avenue Elevated, looking north from 34th The R-42s are seen at Hammels Wye on the last trip northbound from Far Rockaway-Mott Av to Inwood-207 St. Street in about 1937, pho- Marc A. Hermann photograph tographer unknown. MTA New York City Transit retired the last thusiasts joined MTA Chairman and CEO remaining R-42 subway cars from service Patrick J. Foye and NYC Transit President today, ending a 51-year run. The cars have Andy Byford riding the last R-42 in passen- been used on two dozen lines, each traveling ger service. more than seven million miles. They had a “These cars have served the MTA well as a memorable role in an iconic car-vs.-train reliable fleet over the last 50 years,” said Sal- In This Issue: chase in the classic 1971 film French Con- ly Librera, Senior Vice President, Department LIRR Main Line nection. of Subways for New York City Transit. “As Third-Track The final run followed a send-off ceremony technology advances, we’re looking to mod- at the New York Transit Museum, and was ernize our fleet of subway cars to best serve Project Update scheduled to proceed through a final trip on New Yorkers.” …Page 3 the A line from Euclid Av to Far Rockaway (Continued on page 2) to 207 St, before returning to Euclid Av to close its doors for the last time.
    [Show full text]
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)
    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]