Southern Bioenergy Roadmap

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Southern Bioenergy Roadmap Southern Bioenergy Roadmap Southern Bioenergy Roadmap SOUTHEAST AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY ENERGY RESOURCES ALLIANCE A project of the Southeast Agriculture & Forestry Energy Resources Alliance (SAFER) SOUTHEAST AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY and the University of Florida ENERGY RESOURCES ALLIANCE Southern Bioenergy Roadmap A project of the Southeast Agriculture & Forestry Energy Resources Alliance (SAFER) and the University of Florida Charity Pennock Program Manager, Southern Growth Policies Board Project Coordinator, SAFER Scott Doron Director, Southern Technology Council Southern Growth Policies Board Research Team Dr. Janaki R.R. Alavalapati Ilan Kaufer Professor and Head, Department of Forestry, College of Natural PhD Student, School of Forest Resources and Conservation Resources, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University University of Florida Dr. Alan W. Hodges Jagannadha R. Matta Extension Scientist, Food and Resource Economics Department, Project Associate, School of Forest Resources and Conservation Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida University of Florida Andres Susaeta Pankaj Lal PhD Student, School of Forest Resources and Conservation PhD Student, School of Forest Resources and Conservation University of Florida University of Florida Sidhanand Kukrety Puneet Dwivedi PhD Student, School of Forest Resources and Conservation PhD Student, School of Forest Resources and Conservation University of Florida University of Florida Dr. Thomas J. Stevens III Dr. Mohammad Rahmani Post Doctoral Associate, Food and Resource Economics Department, Coordinator of Economic Analysis, Food and Resource Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Economics Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute University of Florida of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida SAFER Steering Committee & Advisors Leonard Bull John Long Timothy White Co-Chairman, Professor of Animal Science Owner, Overbridge Farm Director and Professor, School of Forest Associate Director, Animal and Poultry Waste Resources and Conservation, Management Center, North Carolina State Nathan McClure University of Florida University Chief Forester, Forest Uilization and Marketing, Georgia Forestry Commission Kelly Zering Liam Leightley Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture Co-Chairman, Executive Director, Institute of Timothy Rials & Resource Economics, North Carolina State Advanced Learning and Research Director, Research and Development, Office of University Bioenergy Programs, University of Tennessee Brian Davison Chief Scientist, Life Sciences, Oak Ridge Stephen Smith Advisors National Laboratory Executive Director, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Brent Bailey David E. Dismukes Southeast Facillitator, 25 x ‘25 Professor, Associate Executive Director & Ron Sparks Director of Policy Analysis, Center for Energy Commissioner, Alabama Department of John Bonitz Studies, Louisiana State University Agriculture and Industries Farm Outreach & Policy Advocacy, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Thomas Klindt David Waide Associate Dean, AgResearch Center, President, Mississippi Farm Bureau Glen Zorn University of Tennessee Deputy Commissioner, Alabama Department Doyle Weltzbarker of Agriculture and Industries Brooksco Dairy LLC SAFER Underwriting Member: Southern Association of Agriculture Experiment Station Directors Special thanks to: Memphis Bioworks Foundation, Biomass South 2008 Funded in part by: The Energy Foundation SOUTHEAST AGRICULTURE & FORESTRY ENERGY RESOURCES ALLIANCE c/o SOUTHERN GROWTH POLICIES BOARD P.O. BOX 12293, RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC 27709 PHONE: 919-941-5145 • FAX: 919-941-5594 http://www.saferalliance.net ©2009 Southeast Agriculture & Forestry Energy Resources Alliance Table of Contents The Southern Bioenergy Roadmap can be downloaded in full at http://www.saferalliance.net/projects/bioenergy_roadmap.pdf Executive Summary ..................................................................................1 Introduction ...........................................................................................13 I. Socio-economic, Land Use, and Energy Profile Socio-economic profile ...................................................................... 15 Land use allocations ..........................................................................17 Energy profile ...................................................................................20 Renewable electricity .........................................................................24 Alternative fuels ................................................................................25 Emissions ........................................................................................26 II. Commercial Inventory Fueling stations .................................................................................27 Biofuel production plants .................................................................... 28 Electric power generation from biomass ................................................. 31 Biomass feedstock availability .............................................................. 37 Summary of bioenergy feedstock resources ............................................. 49 Economic contribution of biopower generation ....................................... 50 III. Policy Inventory State energy plans .............................................................................53 Policies and programs ........................................................................ 54 Regulatory mechanisms ...................................................................... 55 Incentive-based policies ..................................................................... 58 Support programs ..............................................................................61 IV. Research & Education Research centers ...............................................................................63 Education & training centers ................................................................ 64 V. Results from Expert Survey and Stakeholder Meeting Open-ended survey ...........................................................................66 Stakeholder meetings .........................................................................74 Endnotes & Bibliography ........................................................................ 75 Appendices A - Listing of bioenergy-related companies in the South............................. 78 B - Select bioenergy policies of Southern States ....................................... 90 C - Select bioenergy research centers in the South .................................. 117 D - Select bioenergy education and training centers in the South ............... 122 E - Expert perception survey .............................................................. 125 ©2009 Southeast Agriculture & Forestry Energy Resources Alliance Executive Summary a In June 2008, U.S. gasoline prices soared to over $4 a gallon, bringing About SAFER: into question the country’s dependence on oil. In November 2008, the International Energy Agency reported that by 2030 the demand for energy SAFER would grow by 45 percent. In January 2009, recession and rising unemploy- The Southeast Agriculture & Forestry Energy Resources ment caused local, state, and federal leaders to seek new ways to stimu- Alliance (SAFER) was formed late the economy, create jobs, and increase tax revenues. Altogether, these to provide strategic leadership to the agricultural and events, rather than be cause for fear and anxiety, represent a window of forestry sectors in advancing opportunity for which the South1 is uniquely positioned. renewable energy initiatives in the Southeast with the purpose of seeing the South What’s the opportunity? become the nation’s leader in For the South to lead the U.S. in reducing the nation’s dependence on im- renewable energy production. SAFER works toward this vision ported oil, meeting new energy demand, and creating thousands of jobs for by engaging in strategies for Southerners. better policy, targeted research, efficient commercialization, and outreach and education. How does the South do it? The Alliance was formed in 2006 through an initiative By wisely using its resources to become the nation’s leader in the research, of the Energy Foundation in 2 conjunction with the national production, and distribution of bioenergy . 25 x ’25 committee to bring together representation What’s the economic impact? from across the bioenergy landscape. In early 2007, the Alliance selected Southern Increased jobs and wealth for Southerners, particularly in rural commu- Growth Policies Board to be its nities. In 2007, the renewable energy sector grossed over $40 billion in management and fiscal agent. To become a member 3 revenues and employed over 500,000 workers in the U.S. Two studies and for more information, go to provide examples of the potential economic impact: http://www.saferalliance.net. ➤ A 2007 study by the University of Georgia found that the annual operation Southern Growth of a 49 million gallon cellulosic ethanol4 plant in Treutlen County, Georgia Policies Board Southern Growth Policies Board (population ~7,000) would have a total direct and indirect economic is a non-partisan public policy impact to the state of $150 million in annual revenues, $17.5 million think tank based in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. in annual labor income, $3 million in annual state and local taxes, and Formed by the region’s 444 jobs.5 governors
Recommended publications
  • Putting Clean Tech on a Path to Subsidy Independence
    APRIL 2012 BE YOND BOOM & BUST PUTTING CLEAN TECH ON A PATH TO SUBSIDY INDEPENDENCE Jesse Jenkins, Director of Energy and Climate Policy, Breakthrough Institute Mark Muro, Senior Fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, Cofounders, Breakthrough Institute Letha Tawney, Senior Associate, World Resources Institute Alex Trembath, Policy Associate, Breakthrough Institute APRIL 2012 BE YOND BOOM & BUST PUTTING CLEAN TECH ON A PATH TO SUBSIDY INDEPENDENCE Jesse Jenkins, Director of Energy and Climate Policy, Breakthrough Institute Mark Muro, Senior Fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Institution Ted Nordhaus and Michael Shellenberger, Cofounders, Breakthrough Institute Letha Tawney, Senior Associate, World Resources Institute Alex Trembath, Policy Associate, Breakthrough Institute INSTITUTIONAL AFFILIATIONS LISTED FOR IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY APRIL 2012 CONTENTS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY g CONTENTS f 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Key Recommendations for a New Era of Clean Energy Policy 8g Key Recommendations for a New Era of Clean Energy Policy 8 PART 1: FROM CLEAN TECH BOOM TO FEDERAL SPENDING BUST 1g2 PART 1: FROM CLEAN TECH BOOM TO FEDERAL SPENDING BUST Methodology 1g5 12 Methodology 15 Analysis of Federal Clean Tech Spending, 2009 to 2014 1g6 Analysis of Federal Clean Tech Spending, 2009 to 2014 16 The Federal Clean Tech Funding Cliff 1g9 The Federal Clean Tech Funding Cliff 19 What’s Left After 2014? 2g2 What’s Left After 2014? 22 PART 2: CLEAN TECH MARKET IMPACTS 2g3 PART 2: Wind
    [Show full text]
  • MANUFACTURING AGENDA a National Blueprint for Clean Technology Manufacturing Leadership and Industrial Transformation CONTENTS
    MANUFACTURING AGENDA A National Blueprint for Clean Technology Manufacturing Leadership and Industrial Transformation CONTENTS Executive Summary 2 Overarching Objectives 4 MANUFACTURING AGENDA 6 PILLAR 1: Invest at Scale in a New Generation of American Manufacturing 6 PILLAR 2: Innovate to Transform Industry 11 PILLAR 3: Responsibly Mine, Reclaim, and Recycle Critical Materials 14 PILLAR 4: Use Public Investment Wisely to Build a Strong, Clean, Fair Manufacturing Economy Across America 16 PILLAR 5: Change the Rules to Build a Clean Economy that Works for All 20 Glossary of Key Concepts and Terms 23 Endnotes iii Cover photo by: Sam VarnHagen, courtesy of Ford Motor Company EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction The U.S. can once again lead the world in manufacturing the technologies and products of the future. As an integral part of an aggressive strategy to address the climate emergency head on—and in line with achieving net zero emissions economy-wide by 2050—we have the opportunity to modernize and transform our industrial base to make it the cleanest and most advanced in the world, while spurring the creation of a new generation of good, safe jobs manufacturing clean technology. This industrial transformation can bring dynamic industries back to communities that have been left behind by deindustrialization and under-investment, and provide a starting point for broadly shared growth and prosperity. Last year, the BlueGreen Alliance—alongside our labor central role in the balance of U.S. imports and exports— and environmental partners—released Solidarity for and the jobs that go with them. Manufacturing also Climate Action, an ambitious, concrete platform to has the proven ability to provide pathways into the address the crises of climate change and economic and middle class for millions of workers and families, and to racial inequality simultaneously.1 support millions of high-skill, high-wage jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Fostering Clean Technology Innovation
    The GEF UNIDO Global Cleantech Programme for SMEs Fostering Clean Technology Innovation in Emerging and Developing Countries “We are creating an innovative, global program supporting small- and medium- sized enterprises by leveraging the Cleantech Open’s global platform with UNIDO’s international network and resources.” — Dr. Naoko Ishii, CEO and Chairperson, Global Environment Facility EntrEprEnEurial innovation is thE answEr to our most prEssing EnvironmEntal problEms, and thE kEy to Economic growth • Innovators are developing ingenious solutions to major challenges in energy generation, distribution and storage, air and water pollution, waste management, new forms of transport and construction techniques. • Entrepreneurship thrives in countries where there’s minimal red tape, strong rule of law, ready access to venture capital, and a vibrant support network for entrepreneurs. • Almost all net new jobs are created by growing small businesses. storage, air and water pollution, waste management, new forms of transport and construction techniques. gEF, unido and clEantEch opEn bring PROVEn EXpEriEncE • UNIDO and the Cleantech Open, with the support of the GEF, have joined forces to launch cleantech platforms and competitions in developing and emerging countries, based on the Cleantech Open’s proven accelerator model originally created in Silicon Valley. • UNIDO has been supporting SME’s in developing countries for over 20 years. • The Cleantech Open runs the world’s largest cleantech accelerator, supporting innovators and entrepreneurs through extensive training, mentoring, showcases and access to capital: • Over 720 startups have completed this process in the United States alone • Over 40% of reporting alumni companies have now raised capital totalling over $800M, creating thousands of jobs • Participating countries will have access to the UNIDO’s in-country resources and to the Cleantech Open’s events, training, materials and an online global platform connecting entrepreneurs to a global network of mentors, investors and experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Low-Carbon Transport Through the GEF
    Advancing Sustainable Low-Carbon Transport Through the GEF A STAP Advisory Document Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel, administered by UNEP, advises the Global Environmental Facility Advancing Sustainable Low-Carbon Transport Through the GEF A STAP Advisory Document Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel The Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel, administered by UNEP, advises the Global Environmental Facility Advancing Sustainable Low-Carbon Transport Through the GEF Prepared on behalf of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel (STAP) of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) by: Holger Dalkmann (Transport Research Laboratory) and Cornie Huizenga (Partnership on Sustainable, Low Carbon Transport)* Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Lev Neretin of the Secretariat of the Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel of the GEF for the guidance provided in the drafting of the Advisory Document. The Document benefited greatly from the comments and suggestions received from the World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Inter-American Development Bank, the United Nations Development Program, the United Nations Environment Program, as well as the GEF Secretariat. A draft of the document was also circulated for comments to selected members of the Partnership for Sustainable Low Carbon Transport and comments were received from Axel Friedrich; Heather Allen (International Organization for Public transport); Andrea Lobo and Hilda Martinez (Center for Sustainable Transport Mexico); Sophie Punte (Clean Air Initiative for Asian Cities Center); Sanjivi Sundar (The Energy and Resources Center); Eric Zusman (Institute for Global Environmental Strategies). Please use the following reference for this publication: GEF-STAP (2010). Advancing Sustainable Low-Carbon Transport Through the GEF, A STAP advisory document by Holger Dalkmann and Cornie Huizenga.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethanol Industry in Illinois
    The Ethanol Industry in Illinois Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability 703 Stratton Office Building Springfield, IL 62706 February 2008 53054_A_CGFA_Cover.indd 1 2/4/2008 10:48:13 AM Commission on Government Forecasting and Accountability COMMISSION CO-CHAIRMEN Senator Jeffrey M. Schoenberg Representative Richard P. Myers SENATE HOUSE Bill Brady Patricia Bellock Don Harmon Frank Mautino Christine Radogno Robert Molaro David Syverson Elaine Nekritz Donne Trotter Raymond Poe EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Dan R. Long DEPUTY DIRECTOR Trevor J. Clatfelter REVENUE MANAGER Jim Muschinske AUTHOR OF REPORT Benjamin L. Varner EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Donna K. Belknap TABLE OF CONTENTS A Report on the Ethanol Industry in Illinois – February 2008 PAGE Executive Summary i I. The History of Ethanol 1 II. Ethanol Manufacturing Process 11 III. State Government Support of Ethanol 14 IV. Ethanol Controversies 20 V. The Economic Effects of Ethanol 23 VI. Conclusion 27 TABLES: Illinois Ethanol Industry 7 E-85 Production in Illinois 15 Renewable Fuels Development Program Grants 16 Dry Mill Ethanol Profitability 23 Break Even Analysis of Ethanol 24 RFA Study Results 25 ISU Study Results 25 U of I Study Results 26 CHARTS: 2006 World Ethanol Production 4 U.S. Ethanol Production and Plants 5 U.S. Ethanol Biorefinery Locations 5 Ethanol Production Capacity by State 6 Petroleum Prices 10 Corn Prices 10 The Dry Milling Process 11 The Wet Milling Process 13 APPENDICES: Appendix A. U.S. Ethanol Plants 28 Appendix B. Illinois Ethanol Plant Permits 33 Appendix C. E-85 Fueling Stations in Illinois 35 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents an overview of the ethanol industry in Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Energy Solutions and Clean Technologies in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia
    Sustainable Energy Solutions and Clean Technologies in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia INCLUSIVE AND SUSTAINABLE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Copyright © UNIDO 2018. All rights reserved. This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the state reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. The opinions, statistical data and estimates contained in signed articles are the responsibility of the author(s) and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or bearing the endorsement of UNIDO. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information herein, neither UNIDO nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from the use of this material. This document may be freely quoted or reprinted but acknowledgement is requested. For reference and citation, please use: UNIDO (2018). Sustainable Energy Solutions and Clean Technologies in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. Fresner, J., Krenn, C., Schoening, S. A report of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • The Latest Edition of ECOS News We Have Recently Been
    November 2010 Welcome to the latest edition of ECOS News CONTENT We have recently been asked to elaborate on private equity or venture capital funds that like ECOS, are active in the renewable energy and/or clean technology sectors with a geographic focus on Latin America. There are some examples but for now, not many exist. There are a great number of investors making commitments in the segments and geographies previously EDITORIAL mentioned; however, the combinations are not exact. One comes across global or international clean-tech funds that also invest in Latin America; or across non sector specific Latin American funds that also invest in clean tech / renewable energies. At ECOS, we feel privileged to have co-invested with fine partners and plan LATIN AMERICA to continue doing so, nonetheless the question remains - why are there just a few sector and market specific - Macro Trends vehicles, similar to ECOS in the Latin American markets today? Market size does not seem to be the issue: Brazil or Mexico (and increasingly Chile or Colombia) have an impressive number of funds and active asset managers (not sector specific). Exit options may be a factor that SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY influences fund managers to not bet on just one sector or one market: “IPOability” is not yet a given in most - General Trends markets, so trade sale opportunities need to be screened as from the moment an investment is made. - News ECOForest Regulatory frameworks seem to be another crucial element; at the end, regulatory measures are the - Portfolio Companies backbone of the creation of many European and North American funds that opted for a sector specific investment mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Bioenergy Contributing to Informed Decision Making on Bioenergy Issues
    Printed in Austria V.09-87585–November 2009–1000 Navigating Bioenergy Contributing to informed decision making on bioenergy issues UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 300, 1400 Vienna, Austria Telephone: (+43-1) 26026-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26926-69 E-mail: [email protected], Internet: www.unido.org NAVIGATING BIOENERGY Contributing to informed decision making on bioenergy issues UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna, 2009 This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designa- tions employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FOREWORD Today’s convergence of crises—the economic slowdown and the financial squeeze, compounded by continuing volatility in food and fuel prices—is shaping the global energy agenda and heightening concerns over energy security and climate change. Energy security is vital to developed and developing countries alike. But for developing countries, access to reliable and modern energy services is indispens able to fighting poverty and achieving sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Technologies and Sustainable Development
    International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences ISSN 0973-6077 Volume 12, Number 5 (2017), pp. 937-951 © Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com The Importance of Green Technologies and Energy Efficiency for Environmental Protection Mohd. Wira Mohd Shafiei and Hooman Abadi School of Housing, Building and Planning, Universiti Sains Malaysia. 11800 USM, Penang, Malaysia. Abstract It is essential that an appropriate model of green building be used by the administrators and professionals. The global problems of environmental degradation have forced the society to rethink about the way of development and evolve the concept of sustainable development. Indeed, the new environmentally friendly technologies are fundamental to attain sustainable development. Various green initiatives are being taken to maintain and improve the quality of environment that might flourish on the new resource efficient and sustainable thinking society of the future. There is hope for international action in the application of science and technology to environmental concerns a hope born of the urgency of current environmental problems, of the new-found recognition of mutual environmental interests and of the fundamental role of science and technology in general and green technologies, in particular, in assessing and responding to environmental threats. This study aims to investigate the prima facie conjecture that there are problems to an evaluation on development of green building and energy efficiency in developed country with regard to the effectiveness of green building. These problems may explain why the main players are less responsive to the implementation and practice of the green building and energy efficiency .The data were collected via a questionnaire survey and analysed with the help of SPSS.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Sustainable Mobility. a User-Friendly Transport System Is A
    Smart sustainable mobility A user-friendly transport system is a combination of intelligence, low carbon energy, and adaptable services ISIONS •V •S S C T I H E N G I C L E H • T G 5 I E H C H H C N R O A L E O S G E Y R • VTT VISIONS 5 Smart sustainable mobility ISBN 978-951-38-8274-7 (print) ISBN 978-951-38-8275-4 (online) VTT Visions 5 ISSN-L 2242-1157 ISSN 2242-1157 (print) ISSN 2242-1165 (online) Copyright © VTT 2014 PUBLISHER VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland P.O. Box 1000 (Tekniikantie 4 A, Espoo) FI-02044 VTT, Finland Tel. +358 20 722 111, fax +358 722 7001 AUTHORS: Raine Hautala, Veikko Karvonen, Jukka Laitinen, Juhani Laurikko, Nils-Olof Nylund, Mikko Pihlatie, Karri Rantasila, Anu Tuominen EDITORS: Nils-Olof Nylund & Kaisa Belloni DRAWINGS: Jutta Suksi PHOTOS: Non-royalty free images copyright VTT Printed in Kopijyvä, Kuopio 2014 Contents MOBILITY RE-INVENTED 6 GRAND CHALLENGES AND SETTING THE STAGE 8 Key point: de-carbonizing transport 11 Transport in numbers globally 16 Special characteristics of the transport sector in Finland 19 SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY IS A MINDSET AND AN OPPORTUNITY! 22 The game is changing! 24 From motoring to mobility 26 From fossil to renewables 29 Electrifying transport 34 SMART MOBILITY INTEGRATED WITH LOW-CARBON ENERGY 38 Understanding and supporting the socio-technical transition 42 Smart mobility is connected services 48 Going for green energy 54 Cutting the energy use of vehicles in half 60 Cooperation with Helsinki Region Transport 64 Cooperation in competence building 66 VTT excels at making a change 68 SUMMARY 70 References 71 Selected further readings with a focus on smart mobility 72 Smart sustainable mobility 3 4 Smart sustainable mobility Smart sustainable mobility 5 Mobility re-invented Imagine a system based on here is that we need mobility, of people and of actual user demand goods, but we have to fulfil the mobility needs in a smarter and more sustainable way.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Many Benefits of State and Local Clean Energy Initiatives
    Clean Energy and the Economy: Assessing the Many Benefits of State and Local Clean Energy Initiatives Multiple Benefits of What are the economic benefits of Clean Energy Initiatives clean energy? Reducing energy demand and increasing renewable energy generation from state and local clean energy Clean energy initiatives, including those that advance energy efficiency, initiatives—such as goals, standards, codes, funds, and renewable energy and clean distributed generation can: programs—generate many benefits including: ■ Lower energy costs. • Security, diversity, and overall reliability ■ Increase personal disposable income. improvements for the electric system. ■ Increase revenue for businesses. • Improved environmental quality, human health, and quality of life. ■ Increase income, employment, and output. • Increased economic prosperity. ■ Reduce fuel costs and new electric power plant construction costs. This brochure is part of a series and focuses on ■ Reduce health care costs as a result of better air quality and economic benefits. public health. How do clean energy initiatives benefit What’s Inside: • Why assess the economic benefits of the economy? clean energy? • How can policy makers estimate ■ Direct Economic Benefits: Companies that provide the equipment, technologies, the macroeconomic benefits of and services needed to implement an initiative benefit from increased demand, clean energy? which increases their revenue and their ability to hire more people. In the case of • A Benefits Flash with quantitative energy efficiency, consumers and companies both benefit by spending less money examples of how clean energy on electricity. initiatives result in economic, air quality, and public health benefits. ■ Indirect Economic Benefits: Suppliers to clean energy equipment and service • Where to go for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography
    ANNOTATATED (PARTIAL) BIBLIOGRAPHY OF BIOFUEL INFORMATION This bibliography is variously incomplete, depending upon the sub-heading. It might be best to treat this as a list of examples in a rapidly-changing and growing field of information. Various Companies Abengoa Bioenergy [http://www.abengoabioenergy.com]. St. Louis, Missouri. Cellulosic ethanol and biodiesel. International. One of the recipients of multi-million dollar US DOE grants ($385 million) in 2006. Abengoa Bioenergy, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a company dedicated to the development of biofuels for transport, including bioethanol and biodiesel, to support sustainable development. Through different subsidiaries, Abengoa Bioenergy owns and operates facilities to producing and marketing bioethanol throughout the United States and Europe. Its growth strategy is based in improving cost-efficient manufacturing technologies, increasing production and markets –Spain, Germany, France, Sweden- and developing advanced biomass-to-biofuels conversion technologies. R&D activities are devoted to produce bioethanol from cellulose biomass and the development of new bioethanol- based products (E-85, E-diesel, fuel cells). Abengoa Bioenergy is a subsidiary of Abengoa S.A., a company which is headquartered in Sevilla, Spain. Abengoa is a technological company that applies innovative solutions for sustainable development in the infrastructures, environment and energy sectors. It is present in over 70 countries where it operates through its five Business Units: Solar, Bioenergy, Environmental Services, Information Technology, and Industrial Engineering and Construction. Advanced BioRefinery, Inc. [http://www.advbiorefineryinc.ca]. Ontario. Portable bio-oil producing 50 dry ton per day pyrolysis units. Advanced BioRefinery Inc. is a company who's goal is to develop and commercialize affordable, transportable pyrolysis plants which can be used to generate high value heating fuel and chemicals cheaply by "going to the source", literally.
    [Show full text]