DOCSLIB.ORG

Sale and Supply of Goods (SLC 104; LC 160)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sale and Supply of Goods (SLC 104; LC 160) The Law Commission REPORT ON A REFERENCE UNDER SECTION 3(l)(e) OF THE LAW COMMISSIONS ACT 1965 and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 160) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 104) SALE AND SUPPLY OF GOODS Presented to Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate by Command of Her Majesty May 1987 LONDON HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE f9.20 net Cmnd. 137 - The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commis- sions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Mr. Justice Beldam, Chairman Mr. Trevor M. Aldridge Mr. Brian J. Davenport, Q.C. Professor Julian Farrand Professor Brenda Hoggett J The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr. J.G.H. Gasson and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London, WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are- The Honourable Lord Maxwell, Chairman Dr. E.M. Clive Professor Philip N. Love, C.B.E. Mr. J. Murray, Q.C. Sheriff C.G.B. Nicholson, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr. R. Eadie and its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh, EH9 1PR. .* 11 Summary In this joint Report the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission examine the statutory implied terms in contracts for the sale of goods, remedies for breach of those terms and the loss of the right to reject non-conforming goods. They propose that the implied term as to merchantable quality should be reformulated so as to make it clear that it applies to minor defects and covers the durability of the goods. Theypropose no change in the consumer customer’s absolute right to reject non-conforming goods and propose a minor modification of the non-consumer’s right. Similar changes are recommended for other contracts for the supply of goods. In relation to contracts for the sale of goods, a right of partial rejection is recommended, as is clarification of the circumstances in which the right to reject is lost. However, no major change in the law relating to the right to reject is recommended. The use of the terminology of conditions and warranties in the Sale of Goods Act 1979and related legislation is inappropriate for Scots law and changes are recommended to rectify this. The Scottish Law Commission also recommends that provision equivalent to Part I of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 should be made for Scotland. The Report contains a draft Bill to give effect to the recommendations. ... A* 111 i SALE AND SUPPLY OF GOODS CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 1 PART 2: ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESENT LAW 2.1 6 A. Introduction 2.1 6 B. The implied terms as to quality and fitness for purpose 2.5 6 1. The statutory implied term as to merchantable quality 2.5 6 2. The statutory implied term of fitnessfor a particular pur- pose 2.17 11 3. The implied terms in Scots common law 2.20 12 C. Remedies for breach of the implied terms 2.21 12 1. Introduction 2.21 12 2. Sale of goods 2.22 12 (a) The buyer’s remedies in English law: conditions and warranties 2.23 13 (b) Scots law 2.27 14 (i) Need for separate treatment of Scottish position 2.27 14 (ii) Buyer’s remedies in sale of goods 2.28 14 3. Other contracts for the supply of goods 2.32 15 (a) Remedies of the customer: English law 2.32 15 (b) Remedies of the customer: Scots law 2.35 16 D. The loss of the right to return the goods and terminate the contract 2.40 17 1. Sale of goods 2.40 17 (a) Introduction 2.40 17 (b) The buyer’s reasonable opportunity to examine the goods 2.42 18 (c) What constitutes acceptance? 2.44 18 (i) Intimation of acceptance 2.45 18 - (ii) Acts “inconsistent with the ownership of the seller” 2.46 19 (iii) Lapse of time 2.48 19 2. Other contracts for the supply of goods 2.50 20 (a) English law: affirmation 2.50 20 (b) Scots law: personal bar 2.53 21 PART 3: RECOMMENDATIONS ON THE IMPLIED TERM AS TO QUALITY 3.1 22 A. Contracts of sale 3.1 22 1. Introduction 3.1 22 2. Should the implied term as to quality be altered at all? 3.4 22 3. In what way should the implied term be re-defined? 3.7 23 (a) The function of the implied term 3.7 23 (b) Formulation of the implied term 3.13 24 (i) The first element: the basic principle 3.13 24 - (ii) The second element: the list of aspects of quality 3.28 27 iv Paragraph Page Fitness for purpose 3.31 27 State or condition 3.37 29 Appearance, finish, and freedom from minor defects 3.38 29 Safety 3.44 30 Durability 3.47 31 Suitability for immediate use 3.62 33 Spare parts and servicing facilities 3.66 34 B. Other contracts for the supply of goods 3.67 34 PART 4: RECOMMENDATIONS ON REMEDIES 4.1 36 A. Sale of goods 4.1 36 1. Consumers and non-consumers 4.1 36 2. Policy for consumers 4.9 38 3. Policy for non-consumers 4.16 40 4. Summary of principal recommendation 4.25 42 5. Relationship between consumer and non-consumer transactions 4.26 43 B. Other contracts for the-supply of goods 4.31 43 PART 5: RECOMMENDATIONS ON LOSS OF THE RIGHT TO REJECT THE GOODS AND TERMINATE THE CONTRACT 5.1 45 A. Sale of Goods 5.1 45 1. Introduction 5.1 45 2. Should there be a long-term right to reject in contracts of sale? 5.6 46 3. Fixed period for rejection and the length of a “reasonable time” 5.14 47 4. Proposed alterations to the existing rules on loss of the right to reject 5.20 49 (a) Intimation of acceptance and the right to examine 5.20 49 (b) Buyer seeking cure of defective goods 5.26 50 (i) Inconsistent act or intimation of acceptance 5.27 50 (ii) Lapse of a reasonable time 5.30 51 (c) An act inconsistent with the ownership of the seller 5.32 51 5. Matters raised in the Consultative Document but upon which we do not now make recommendations 5.39 52 (a) Damaged or destroyed goods 5.39 52 (b) History of defects in goods 5.41 53 B. Contracts of supply other than sale 5.43 53 1. Hire-purchase and conditional sale agreements 5.43 53 2. Other contracts of supply 5.47 54 PART 6: MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS 6.1 56 A. Remedies for breach of the implied terms as to title, encum- brances and quiet possession in contracts for the sale and supply of goods 6.1 56 B. Partial rejection 6.6 58 1. General proposal 6.6 58 2. The commercial unit 6.12 59 3. Instalment and severable contracts 6.14 59 V .. Paragraph Page C. Remedies for delivery of the wrong quantity 6.17 60 D. Sales by sample 6.24 62 PART 7: STATUTORYIMPLIED TERMS IN CONTRACTS FOR THE SUPPLY OF GOODS: SCOTLAND 7.1 64 I PART 8: SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1 66 Appendix A: Draft Sale and Supply of Goods Bill with Explanatory Notes 69 AppendixB: Text of sections ll-15B, 30,3435A and 53Aof the Sale of Goods Act 1979 as they would be after amendment by the Draft Sale and Supply of Goods Bill 118 Appendix C: List of persons and organisations who submitted com- ments on Working Paper No. 85/Consultative Memo- randum No. 58 124 I x vi . THE LAW COMMISSION AND THE SCOTTISH LAW COMMISSION (Report on a reference to the Law Commission under section 3(l)(e) of the Law Commissions Act 1965) (Item 2 of the First Programme of the Scottish Law Commission) SALE AND SUPPLY OF GOODS To the Right Honourable the Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone, C.H., Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, and the Right Honourable the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, Q.C., Her Majesty’s Advocate PART 1 INTRODUCTION Terms of reference 1.1 On25January 1979,in exerciseof powers under section 3(l)(e)of the Law Commissions Act 1965, the Lord Chancellor asked the Law Commission to consider: “(a) whether the undertakings as to the quality and fitness of goods implied under the law relating to sale of goods, hire-purchase and other contracts for the supply of goods require amendment; (b) the circumstances in which a person, to whom goods are supplied under a contract of sale, hire-purchase or other contract for the supply of goods, is entitled, where there has been a breach by the supplier of a term implied by statute, to (i) reject the goods and treat the contract as repudiated; (ii) claim against the supplier a diminution or extinction of the price; (iii) claim damages against the supplier; (c) the circumstances in which, by reason of the Sale of Goods Act 1893, a buyer loses the right to reject the goods; and to make recommendations.” 1.2 Item 2 of the First Programme of Reform of the Scottish Law Commission, which was approved on 21 October 1965, refers to obligations. Accordingly it has not been necessary for the Scottish Law Cornmission to have a special reference to cover the matters under discussion in this Report.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Law Commission Report
    Consumer sales contracts: transfer of ownership HC 1365 Law Com No 398 Consumer sales contracts: transfer of ownership Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 22 April 2021 HC1365 LAW COM NO 398 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at https://www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/smart-contracts/. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to [email protected]. ISBN 978-1-5286-2531-9 CCS 0421369540 04/21 Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office The Law Commission The Law Commission was set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Right Honourable Lord Nicholas Green, Chairman Professor Sarah Green Professor Nick Hopkins Professor Penney Lewis Nicholas Paines QC The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Phil Golding. The Law Commission is located at 1st Floor, Tower, 52 Queen Anne's Gate, London SW1H 9AG. The terms of this report were agreed on 24 February 2021. The text of this report is available on the Law Commission's website at http://www.lawcom.gov.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • 56 & 57 Vict. C. 71 SALE of GOODS ACT 1893 REVISED Updated to 28
    56 & 57 Vict. c. 71 SALE OF GOODS ACT 1893 REVISED Updated to 28 May 2019 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the Sale of Goods Act 1893. It is prepared by the Law Reform Commission in accordance with its function under the Law Reform Commission Act 1975 (3/1975) to keep the law under review and to undertake revision and consolidation of statute law. All Acts up to and including Greyhound Racing Act 2019 (15/2019), enacted 28 May 2019, and all statutory instruments up to and including European Communities (Sheep Identifi- cation) (Amendment) Regulations 2019 (S.I. No. 243 of 2019), made 28 May 2019, were considered in the preparation of this revision. Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in the preparation of this Revised Act, the Law Reform Commission can assume no responsibility for and give no guarantees, undertakings or warranties concerning the accuracy, completeness or up to date nature of the information provided and does not accept any liability whatsoever arising from any errors or omissions. Please notify any errors, omissions and comments by email to [email protected]. 56 & 57 Vict. c. 71 SALE OF GOODS ACT 1893 REVISED Updated to 28 May 2019 Introduction This revision presents the text of the Act as it has been amended since enactment, and preserves the format in which it was passed. Related legislation Sale of Goods Acts 1893 and 1980: this Act is one of a group of Acts included in this collective citation, to be construed together as one (Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980 (16/1980), s.
    [Show full text]
  • Consumer Sales Contracts: Rules on the Transfer of Ownership of Goods
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 9036, 30 October 2020 Consumer sales contracts: By Lorraine Conway rules on the transfer of ownership of goods Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Current law: when is a consumer contract formed? 3. Current transfer of ownership rules 4. Consultations on reform of transfer of ownership rules 5. Law Commission’s draft Bill 6. Next steps www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Consumer sales contracts: rules on the transfer of ownership of goods Contents Summary 3 1. Introduction 5 1.1 Nature of the problem 5 1.2 The policy rationale for the draft Bill 5 1.3 Coronavirus has created a new sense of urgency 6 2. Current law: when is a consumer contract formed? 8 2.1 When is a sales contract formed? 8 2.2 How do terms and conditions delay formation of a sale contract? 8 2.3 Why delay the formation of the contract? 9 2.4 Possible consumer detriment 9 3. Current transfer of ownership rules 11 3.1 Specific goods 11 3.2 Unascertained or future goods 12 3.3 Goods forming part of a bulk 14 4. Consultations on reform of transfer of ownership rules 16 4.1 Law Commission consultation - June 2015 16 4.2 Law Commission’s Final Report - July 2016 16 4.3 Current Law Commission consultation & draft Bill – July 2020 17 5. Law Commission’s draft Bill 19 5.1 Scope of the proposed new rules 19 5.2 New modern terminology 20 5.3 “Goods identified and agreed” (currently referred to as specific goods) 20 5.4 “Goods not identified and agreed upon” (currently referred to as unascertained goods) 21 5.5 Rules to be mandatory 23 5.6 Goods forming part of a bulk 24 5.7 Transfer of risk 26 5.8 Insolvency and the operation of the proposed transfer of ownership rules 26 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legacy of the Cameron-Clegg Coalition Programme of Reform of the Law on the Supply of Goods, Digital Content and Services to Consumers
    The legacy of the Cameron-Clegg coalition programme of reform of the law on the supply of goods, digital content and services to consumers Article Accepted Version Devenney, J. (2018) The legacy of the Cameron-Clegg coalition programme of reform of the law on the supply of goods, digital content and services to consumers. Journal of Business Law, 6. pp. 485-511. ISSN 0021-9460 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/73357/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Publisher: Sweet & Maxwell All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online The Legacy of the Cameron-Clegg Coalition Programme of Reform of the Law on the Supply of Goods, Digital Content and Services to Consumers James Devenney* Introduction The Cameron-Clegg coalition (2010-2015) oversaw a programme of “fundamental” reform of core consumer law in the UK.1 These reforms were partly driven by EU legislation,2 particularly the Consumer Rights Directive (2011).3 Other factors were more native to the UK. Thus, against the backdrop of the global financial crisis and a desire to strengthen the UK economy, this programme of reform was fuelled by a market-driven approach to consumer law.4 More specifically, consumer law and confident consumers were viewed as key ingredients to the efficient functioning of the market and the development of the economy.5 The centrepiece of the resulting reforms is, undoubtedly, the Consumer Rights Act 2015 which, eventually, gained Royal Assent after an epic6 passage through Parliament: “I am glad I have woken the hon.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Sale of Goods Legislation 1893-2015: Towards Plain(Er)
    ASp la revue du GERAS 74 | 2018 Diachronie et anglais de spécialité UK Sale of Goods Legislation 1893-2015: Towards Plain(er) Language? L'évolution du style des textes législatifs au Royaume-Uni portant sur la vente des biens (1893–2015) Simon Taylor Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/asp/5411 DOI: 10.4000/asp.5411 ISSN: 2108-6354 Publisher Groupe d'étude et de recherche en anglais de spécialité Printed version Date of publication: 1 November 2018 Number of pages: 95-112 ISSN: 1246-8185 Electronic reference Simon Taylor, « UK Sale of Goods Legislation 1893-2015: Towards Plain(er) Language? », ASp [Online], 74 | 2018, Online since 01 November 2019, connection on 10 December 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/asp/5411 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.5411 This text was automatically generated on 10 December 2020. Tous droits réservés UK Sale of Goods Legislation 1893-2015: Towards Plain(er) Language? 1 UK Sale of Goods Legislation 1893-2015: Towards Plain(er) Language? L'évolution du style des textes législatifs au Royaume-Uni portant sur la vente des biens (1893–2015) Simon Taylor 1. Introduction 1 The aim of this article is to discuss whether, through a diachronic study of UK sale of goods legislation, we can detect an evolution in legislative style. If so, what is the nature of this evolution, and to what extent has any change in style been influenced by the Plain Language Movement? 2 The first general sale of goods legislation was introduced into UK1 law in the form of the Sale of Goods Act 1893.
    [Show full text]
  • Sale of Goods Forming Part of a Bulk
    The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 215) (SCOT. LAW COM. No. 145) SALE OF GOODS FORMING PART OF A BULK Laid before Parliament by the Lord High Chancellor and the Lord Advocate pursuant to section 3(2) of the Law Commissions Act 1965 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 20 July 1993 LONDON : HMSO €8.00 net HC 807 The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Brooke, Chairman Mr Trevor M. Aldridge, Q.C. Mr Jack Beatson Mr Richard Buxton, Q.C. Professor Brenda Hoggett, Q.C. The Secretary of the Law Commission is Mr Michael Collon and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WClN 2BQ. The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Davidson, Chairman Dr. E.M. Clive Professor P.N. Love, C.B.E. Sheriff I.D. Macphail, Q.C. Mr W.A. Nimmo Smith, Q.C. The Secretary of the Scottish Law Commission is Mr K.F. Barclay and its offices are at 140 Causewayside, Edinburgh EH9 1PR. 11 THE LAW COMMISSION SALE OF GOODS FORMING PART OF A BULK CONTENTS Paragraph Page PART I: INTRODUCTION 1.1 1 What the report is about 1.1 1 Background to the report 1.2 1 The main consultation 1.4 2 The Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1992 1.5 2 The supplementary consultation 1.6 2 Acknowledgments 1.7 2 PART Ik THE PRESENT LAW 2.1 3 The Sale of Goods Act 1979 2.1 3 The legal effect of section 16 2.4 4 Practical effects of section 16 2.13 7 Comparative
    [Show full text]
  • Infants' Contracts: Law and Policy in the 18Th and 19Th Centuries
    Infants’ Contracts: Law and Policy in the 18th and 19th Centuries Richard Austen-Baker and Kate Hunter* Abstract: Under English law, prior to 1970 young people up to the age of twenty-one lacked the capacity to make binding contracts, subject to certain exceptions. The report of the Latey Committee on the Age of Majority, which had recommended a reduction to age eighteen, was one-sided and, so far as capacity to make contracts was concerned, offered scant evidence as to the motivations of the existing law. The Committee heard evidence from the Church asserting, with no evidence, that such rules were intended to control young people and were there to protect the interests of others. This article argues, especially from analysis of the relevant case law during the 18th and 19th centuries – the principal period of development of English jurisprudence on minors’ contracts – that the law’s motivation had in reality been to protect infants from themselves and from adults who sought to prey on their naivety and impulsiveness. Introduction With the coming into force on 1 January 1970 of section 1 Family Law Reform Act 1969, which lowered the age of majority from twenty-one years to eighteen years, the question of infants’ contracts effectively disappeared as one of interest to the courts of England and Wales. Since mediaeval times, as Simpson concisely puts it, ‘all contracts made by infants * Senior Lecturer in Law, Lancaster University Law School and late Associate Lecturer, Lancaster University Law School, respectively. The authors are grateful to Professor David Milman, Lancaster University Law School, for kindly commenting on this article in draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Product Liability and the English Implied Terms Bill: Transatlantic Variations on a Theme Robert J
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 49 | Issue 1 Article 10 10-1-1973 Product Liability and the English Implied Terms Bill: Transatlantic Variations on a Theme Robert J. Wittebort Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Robert J. Wittebort, Product Liability and the English Implied Terms Bill: Transatlantic Variations on a Theme, 49 Notre Dame L. Rev. 185 (1973). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol49/iss1/10 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PRODUCT LIABILITY AND THE ENGLISH IMPLIED TERMS BILL: TRANSATLANTIC VARIATIONS ON A THEME I. Introduction The action of breach of warranty arose under the general category of Case for deceit without scienter.' Gradually, as liability was extended to encompass parties to express agreements who performed their undertakings badly, the form ,of Assumpsit emerged as distinct from Case. Assumpsit offered distinct proce- dural advantages. Providing an express agreement existed, it allowed enforce- ment of parol contracts and avoided the wager of law, which could be invoked in an action on Debt. After proof of an express promise to pay the contractual "debt" was made unnecessary, the action of Indebitatus Assumpsit supplanted Debt as the vehicle for enforcement of contracts; and, a fortiori, it supplanted Debt as the chief means of recovering for breach of warranty. 2 The delictual character of warranty theory, however, had never been entirely forgotten,3 and was to reappear during the course of the American struggle with the privity doctrine.
    [Show full text]
  • SALE of GOODS ACT 1893 REVISED Updated to 1 October 2012
    56 & 57 Vict. c. 71 SALE OF GOODS ACT 1893 REVISED Updated to 1 October 2012 This revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the Sale of Goods Act 1893. It is prepared by the Law Reform Commission in accordance with its function under the Law Reform Commission Act 1975 (3/1975) to keep the law under review and to undertake revision and consolidation of statute law. All Acts up to and including Public Service Pensions (Single Scheme and Other Provisions) Act 2012 (37/2012), enacted 28 July 2012, and all statutory instruments up to and including Nurses and Midwives Act 2011 (Commencement) (No. 2) Order 2012 (S.I. No. 385 of 2012), made 1 October 2012, were considered in the preparation of this revision. Disclaimer: While every care has been taken in the preparation of this Revised Act, the Law Reform Commission can assume no responsibility for and give no guarantees, undertakings or warranties concerning the accuracy, completeness or up to date nature of the information provided and does not accept any liability whatsoever arising from any errors or omissions. Please notify any errors, omissions and comments by email to [email protected]. 56 & 57 Vict. c. 71 SALE OF GOODS ACT 1893 REVISED Updated to 1 October 2012 Introduction This revision presents the text of the Act as it has been amended since enactment, and preserves the format in which it was passed. Related legislation Sale of Goods Acts 1893 and 1980: this Act is one of a group of Acts included in this collective citation, to be construed together as one [Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Proposals Relating to Amendments to Sections 12-15 Of
    1 .4, N.B. This is a joint docment of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the concluded views of the two Commissions. LAi7 COl.fMI SS I ON (Published Working Paper Bot. 18) and SCOTTISH LAV CONMISSION (Memorandum No. 7) PROVISIONAL PROPOSALS RELATING to &.IEI'?DI~~JTSTO SECTIONS lZJL5OF THE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1893 i and COl!lTRACTlXG OUT OF TH% CONDITIONS ADD 'V'bRRANTIES IMPLIED BY THOSE SECTIONS 22nd YJay 1968 In view of the urgency of this project it is requested that replies should be fornarded not later than 30th September 1968. All correspondence and inquiries should be addressed to: R.G. Greene, Law Commission, Lacon House, Theobalds Road, London, T.C.1. (Tel.: 01-405 8700, ext.- 239) PART I: IIVTRODUCTION 1 PART 11: SECTIONS 12-15 OF T-FEE SALE OF GOODS ACT 1893 2 A. Section 12 3 B. Section 13 4 C. Section 14cj 4 D. Section 14(2) 6 10 E. Section 14(3) I’ a& (4) F. Section 15 10 1 G. Third party bcndficiaries of conditions and warranties 11 PART III : CO-OFDIITATION WITH HIRE PUIiCHASE LEGISLATION 15 PART IV: hERCHAI’iDISX P&iR.KS ACT 1887 16 PART V: COlPEUCTIITG OUT OF COTTDITIONS &JD Yidm?mIES INPLED BY SECTIONS 12-15 OF m SAL;: OF GOODS ACT 1893 17 PUT VIr CONTRACTING OUT OF LIABIJJITY FOR RZGLIGENCE 28 PART VII: SUldiillRY OF COBCLUSIONS fND OF QUESTIOITS UPON WHICH COi’dMENT IS l2TVIm 30 APPENDICES A. Nmes of oenbcrs of the Joint Working Party 33 B, Sections 12-15 of the Sale of Goods Act 1893 34 C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seller's Liability for Sale of Faulty Goods in Scots Law
    McClelland, Paul (2015) The se ller's liability for sale of faulty goods in Scots law. LL.M(R) thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/6503/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] THE SELLER’S LIABILITY FOR SALE OF FAULTY GOODS IN SCOTS LAW Paul McClelland Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of LLM by Research University of Glasgow School of Law College of Social Sciences April 2015 ABSTRACT Through detailed review of the primary sources, this thesis provides a thematic and historical picture of the law of the seller’s liability for the sale of faulty goods, and attempts to describe the boundaries and developments of the legal tools available to the aggrieved purchaser. The thesis begins with an outline of the various routes to liability in classical and Justinianic Roman law, and goes on to show how these forms of liability were understood by early Scots law. It then divides discussion of the Scots law into four principal periods, beginning with the law described by Stair and ending with the modern system of concomitant liability under the Sale of Goods Act 1979 as amended and for error induced by misrepresentation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM Das Folgende Skript Ist Als
    Dieser Artikel stammt von Frank Felgenträger und wurde in 11/2003 unter der Artikelnummer 8565 auf den Seiten von jurawelt.com publiziert. Die Adresse lautet www.jurawelt.com/artikel/8565. FRANK FELGENTRÄGER THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM Das folgende Skript ist als Mitschrift im Rahmen der Fachfremdsprachenausbildung (FFA) zur Englischen Rechtssprache an der Universität Bielefeld entstanden. Es erhebt keinen Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit, sondern soll als Anregung dienen, was zur Prüfung über das Englische Rechtssystem gelernt werden kann. English Legal System Introduction to English Law 2 THE ENGLISH LEGAL SYSTEM A. Sources of English Law......................................................................... 6 I. General Information: .............................................................................. 6 II. Sources of Law ...................................................................................... 6 1. Legislation ........................................................................................... 6 a) Sovereignty of Parliament ................................................................. 6 b) 2 Types of Legislation........................................................................ 6 c) Interpretation of Law by the Courts:................................................... 6 d) Statutes............................................................................................. 7 e) Delegated Legislation........................................................................ 7 2. Judicial Precedent ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]