DOCSLIB.ORG

A Content Analysis of the Coverage of Gun Trafficking Along

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Content Analysis of the Coverage of Gun Trafficking Along View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE COVERAGE OF GUN TRAFFICKING ALONG THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER A Dissertation by OMAR CAMARILLO Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Holly Foster Committee Members, Sarah N. Gatson Jane Sell Alex McIntosh Head of Department, Jane Sell May 2015 Major Subject: Sociology Copyright 2015 Omar Camarillo ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzed how the media on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border portrayed the issue of gun trafficking’s into Mexico and its impact on Mexico’s border violence. National newspapers from both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border were analyzed from January 2009 through January 2012, The New York Times for the U.S. and El Universal for Mexico, which resulted in a sample of 602 newspaper articles. Qualitative research methods were utilized to collect and analyze the data, specifically content analysis. Drawing on a theoretical framework of social problems and framing this study addressed how gun trafficking along the U.S.-Mexico border impacted the drug related violence that is ongoing in Mexico, how gun trafficking was portrayed as a social problem by the media, and how the media depicted the victims of drug related violence. This study revealed six framing devices, “the blame game,” “worthy and unworthy victims,” “positive aspects of gun trafficking,” “negative aspects of gun trafficking,” “indirect mention of gun trafficking,” and “direct mention of gun trafficking” that were utilized by The New York Times and El Universal to discuss and frame the issue gun trafficking into Mexico and its impact on Mexico’s border violence. Gun trafficking into Mexico was found to have met all three of Jamrozik and Nocella’s criteria for a social problem. It had a societal origin in the media of 2008, constituted a threat toward the freedoms and values of the citizens of Mexico, and was found to be amendable to solution through cooperation between the U.S-Mexican governments. In ii the end, this dissertation understands that gun trafficking into Mexico along with the supply and demand of drugs are social problems that needs to be addressed by both the American and Mexican governments in order to prevent further drug related violence. iii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate my dissertation to my parents, Greg and Guadalupe Camarillo, and my dog, Darwin, for always being there for me especially throughout these past several years of graduate school at Texas A&M University. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chairs, Dr. Foster and Dr. Gatson, and my committee members, Dr. Sell, and Dr. McIntosh, for their guidance and support throughout the course of this research and my time in the Sociology graduate program at Texas A&M. I would also like to thank the late Dr. Kaplan for all his guidance, support, and words of wisdom and for being a mentor to me. A big thanks also goes out to my friends and colleagues and the Sociology department faculty and staff for making my time at Texas A&M University a great experience. I would like to personally recognize Carlos Beck, James Chouinard, Eric Gamino, Eric Sepulveda, Andy De La Cruz, Marco Montanez, April Garcia, Megan Collins, Daniel Delgado, Chad Scott and Chyllis Scott for being great and supportive friends and for making my experience at Texas A&M a great and wonderful experience. In addition, thank you to the Criminal Justice and the Sociology Departments from UTPA for all their support and encouragement from my undergrad to graduate school. I would like to thank Dr. Guerra, Dr. Richardson, and Dr. Su from the UTPA Sociology Department for giving me an opportunity to sharpen my skills as a Sociology instructor. Finally, thank you to my mother and father, Guadalupe and Greg Camarillo, and my brother, Greg R. Camarillo, for their encouragement and support. I would also like to thank my dogs, Darwin, Randal, Weber, and Kara, for their patience, loyalty, and understanding when I was hell bent on writing before I would take them to the dog park. v NOMENCLATURE AECA Arms Export Control Act ATF Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives BORSTAR Border Patrol Search, Trauma, and Rescue CBP Customs and Border Protection DEA Drug Enforcement Agency DOJ Department of Justice DTO Drug Trafficking Organizations FFL Federal Firearms License FCC Federal Communications Commission FOPA Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986 GAO Government Accountability Office GCA Gun Control Act of 1968 NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement NFA National Firearms Act of 1934 NRA National Rifle Association vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION ............................................................................................. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................. v NOMENCLATURE ...................................................................................... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................. vii LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................... ix LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................ x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................ 1 Theoretical Framing .......................................................... 8 Definitions ......................................................................... 15 II LITERATURE REVIEW I .................................................... 17 Drug Cartels ...................................................................... 17 Gun Running/Firearms Trafficking ................................... 20 International Arms Trafficking ......................................... 36 Globalization and NAFTA ................................................ 40 United States Gun Policies ................................................ 44 Mexican Gun Policies ....................................................... 48 Enforcement of U.S. Gun Laws ........................................ 50 ATF Operations ................................................................. 51 Possible Solutions to Gun Running ................................... 55 III LITERATURE REVIEW II ................................................. 57 Media Theory: Framing ................................................... 57 Moral Panic ...................................................................... 61 Media as a Medium .......................................................... 65 vii Propaganda Model ........................................................... 66 Worthy and Unworthy Victims ....................................... 73 Summary ......................................................................... 75 Research Problem ............................................................ 77 Research Objectives and Hypotheses .............................. 81 IV METHODOLOGY ................................................................ 83 V THE IMPACT OF GUN TRAFFICKNG ............................. 103 Frame 1: Blame Game ...................................................... 107 Frame 2: Worthy and Unworthy Victims ......................... 121 Frame 3: Positive Aspects of Gun Trafficking ................. 158 Frame 4: Negative Aspects of Gun Trafficking ............... 168 Summary .......................................................................... 183 Endnotes ........................................................................... 187 VI IS GUN TRAFFICKING INTO MEXICO A SOCIAL PROBLEM?........................................................................... 191 Frame 5: Indirect Mention of Gun Trafficking ............... 217 Frame 6: Direct Mention of Gun Trafficking .................. 227 Summary ......................................................................... 237 Endnotes .......................................................................... 243 VII CONCLUSION ..................................................................... 245 REFERENCES .............................................................................................. 267 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................... 284 APPENDIX B ............................................................................................... 305 viii LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1: Cartel Territories and Drug Routes ................................................ 3 Figure 2: Who is to Blame for Mexico’s Border Violence and Gun Trafficking Problem ............................................................................... 120 Figure 3: Victims of Mexico’s Border Violence ........................................... 156 Figure 4: Fear of Violence............................................................................. 157 Figure 5: Positive Aspects of Gun Trafficking ............................................. 167 Figure 6: Negative Aspects of Gun Trafficking ........................................... 182 ix LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1: Frames and Their Components ....................................................... 106 x CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Drugs,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Link Directory Targeting Tomorrow’S Terrorist Today (T4) Through OSINT By: Mr
    Creative Commons Copyright © Ben Benavides—no commercial exploitation without contract June 2011 Country Studies Public Places Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) Link Directory Targeting Tomorrow’s Terrorist Today (T4) through OSINT by: Mr. E. Ben Benavides CounterTerrorism Infrastructure Money Laundering Gang Warfare Open Source Intelligence is the non-cloak- and-dagger aspect of fact collecting. (Alan D. Tompkins) Human Smuggling Weapon Smuggling IEDs/EFPs Creative Commons Copyright © Ben Benavides—no commercial exploitation without contract Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................ 2 Comments ................................................................................................................................... 7 Open Source Intelligence (OSINT): What It Is and What It Isn’t ................................................... 8 How To Use Open Source Intelligence ........................................................................................ 9 Key Army Access Sites .............................................................................................................. 17 Must Haves References ............................................................................................................ 18 Core Open Source Intelligence Documents & Guides ........................................................... 18 MI Officer Students ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Shadow of Saint Death
    In the Shadow of Saint Death The Gulf Cartel and the Price of America’s Drug War in Mexico Michael Deibert An imprint of Rowman & Littlefield Distributed by NATIONAL BOOK NETWORK Copyright © 2014 by Michael Deibert First Lyons Paperback Edition, 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means, including information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher, except by a reviewer who may quote passages in a review. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available The Library of Congress has previously catalogued an earlier (hardcover) edition as follows: Deibert, Michael. In the shadow of Saint Death : the Gulf Cartel and the price of America’s drug war in Mexico / Michael Deibert. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7627-9125-5 (hardback) 1. Drug traffic—Mexican-American Border Region. 2. Drug dealers—Mexican-American Border Region. 3. Cartels—Mexican-American Border Region. 4. Drug control—Mexican- American Border Region. 5. Drug control—United States. 6. Drug traffic—Social aspects— Mexican-American Border Region. 7. Violence—Mexican-American Border Region. 8. Interviews—Mexican-American Border Region. 9. Mexican-American Border Region—Social conditions. I. Title. HV5831.M46D45 2014 363.450972—dc23 2014011008 ISBN 978-1-4930-0971-8 (pbk.) ISBN 978-1-4930-1065-3 (e-book) The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence
    [Show full text]
  • Justice-Reform
    Mexico Institute SHARED RESPONSIBILITY: U.S.-MEXICO POLICY OPTIONS FOR CONFRONTING ORGANIZED CRIME Edited by Eric L. Olson, David A. Shirk, and Andrew Selee Mexico Institute Available from: Mexico Institute Trans-Border Institute Woodrow Wilson International University of San Diego Center for Scholars 5998 Alcalá Park, IPJ 255 One Woodrow Wilson Plaza San Diego, CA 92110-2492 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20004-3027 www.sandiego.edu/tbi www.wilsoncenter.org/mexico ISBN : 1-933549-61-0 October 2010 The Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, established by Congress in 1968 and headquartered in Washington, D.C., is a living national memorial to President Wilson. The Center’s mission is to commemorate the ideals and concerns of Woodrow Wilson by providing a link between the worlds of ideas and policy, while fostering research, study, discussion, and collaboration among a broad spectrum of individuals concerned with policy and scholarship in national and international affairs. Supported by public and private funds, the Center is a nonpartisan institution engaged in the study of national and world affairs. It establishes and maintains a neutral forum for free, open, and informed dialogue. Conclusions or opinions expressed in Center publications and programs are those of the authors and speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center staff, fellows, trustees, advisory groups, or any individuals or organizations that provide financial support to the Center. The Center is the publisher of The Wilson Quarterly and home of Woodrow Wilson Center Press, dialogue radio and television, and the monthly news-letter “Centerpoint.” For more information about the Center’s activities and publications, please visit us on the web at www.wilsoncenter.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Gun Control Legislation
    Gun Control Legislation William J. Krouse Specialist in Domestic Security and Crime Policy November 14, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL32842 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Gun Control Legislation Summary Congress has debated the efficacy and constitutionality of federal regulation of firearms and ammunition, with strong advocates arguing for and against greater gun control. In the wake of the July 20, 2012, Aurora, CO, theater mass shooting, in which 12 people were shot to death and 58 wounded (7 of them critically) by a lone gunman, it is likely that there will be calls in the 112th Congress to reconsider a 1994 ban on semiautomatic assault weapons and large capacity ammunition feeding devices that expired in September 2004. There were similar calls to ban such feeding devices (see S. 436/H.R. 1781) following the January 8, 2011, Tucson, AZ, mass shooting, in which 6 people were killed and 14 wounded, including Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who was grievously wounded. These calls could be amplified by the August 5, 2012, Sikh temple shooting in Milwaukee, WI, in which six worshipers were shot to death and three wounded by a lone gunman. The 112th Congress continues to consider the implications of Operation Fast and Furious and allegations that the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) mishandled that Phoenix, AZ-based gun trafficking investigation. On June 28, 2012, the House passed a resolution (H.Res. 711) citing Attorney General Eric Holder with contempt for his failure to produce additional, subpoenaed documents related to Operation Fast and Furious to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Enforcement Administration FOIA Request Logs, FY2011-2016
    Drug Enforcement Administration FOIA request logs, FY2011-2016 Brought to you by AltGov2 www.altgov2.org/FOIALand Received between 10/01/2010 and 09/30/2011 Request ID Received Date Closed Date Request Description Final Disposition 10/1/2010 4/30/2012 ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION Granted/Denied in Part REGARDING AIRCRAFT BEECRAFT KING AIR 200 TAIL/ID #N642TF. ETC. 11-00001-F 8/2/2011 8/2/2011 INFORMATION CONCERNING THE "COCAINE Other Reasons - Records not reasonably 11-00002-F DRUG STATUE" described 6/22/2011 6/22/2011 INFORMATION REGARDING ILLEGAL DRUG Other Reasons - "Refusal to comply with other ACTIVITIES BETWEEN FLORIDA AND BILLERICA, requirements - Identification..." MA THAT WAS REPORTED TO DEA BY THE BOSTON, MA FIELD INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 11-00003-F TEAMS (FIST) (SEPTEMBER 2005) 10/5/2010 6/29/2011 ANY AND ALL REPORTS, NOTICES OF LOSS Granted in full AND/OR FILINGS OF ANY SORT PERTAINING TO THE HAMPSTEAD PHARMACY, INC. AND/OR HAMPSTEAD MEDICAL CENTER LOCATED AT 14980 US WEST HIGHWAY 17, NORTH 11-00004-F HAMPSTEAD, NORTH CAROLINA 28443 10/5/2010 6/24/2011 COPIES OF THE "OATH OF OFFICE" FOR THE Granted/Denied in Part (b)(6), DEA SPECIAL AGENTS, FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION'S LAKE MARY/HEATHROW 11-00005-F OFFICE IN FLORIDA 10/5/2010 6/27/2011 STRIDE DATA ON MARIJUANA FOR ALL YEARS Other Reasons - Request Withdrawn 11-00006-F AVAILABLE 10/5/2010 11/29/2010 ANY AND ALL RECORSD IN POSSESSION, Other Reasons - "Refusal to comply with other CUSTODY, OR CONTROL OF THE DRUG requirements - Identification..." ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION THAT REFER TO, RELATE, TO OR MENTION (b)(6), ETC.
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis of the Coverage of Gun Trafficking Along
    A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE COVERAGE OF GUN TRAFFICKING ALONG THE U.S.-MEXICO BORDER A Dissertation by OMAR CAMARILLO Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Holly Foster Committee Members, Sarah N. Gatson Jane Sell Alex McIntosh Head of Department, Jane Sell May 2015 Major Subject: Sociology Copyright 2015 Omar Camarillo ABSTRACT This dissertation analyzed how the media on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border portrayed the issue of gun trafficking’s into Mexico and its impact on Mexico’s border violence. National newspapers from both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border were analyzed from January 2009 through January 2012, The New York Times for the U.S. and El Universal for Mexico, which resulted in a sample of 602 newspaper articles. Qualitative research methods were utilized to collect and analyze the data, specifically content analysis. Drawing on a theoretical framework of social problems and framing this study addressed how gun trafficking along the U.S.-Mexico border impacted the drug related violence that is ongoing in Mexico, how gun trafficking was portrayed as a social problem by the media, and how the media depicted the victims of drug related violence. This study revealed six framing devices, “the blame game,” “worthy and unworthy victims,” “positive aspects of gun trafficking,” “negative aspects of gun trafficking,” “indirect mention of gun trafficking,” and “direct mention of gun trafficking” that were utilized by The New York Times and El Universal to discuss and frame the issue gun trafficking into Mexico and its impact on Mexico’s border violence.
    [Show full text]
  • ATF Gunwalking Scandal - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 06/11/2014
    ATF gunwalking scandal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 06/11/2014 Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Search ATF gunwalking scandal From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page "Gunwalking", or "letting guns walk", was a tactic of the Contents Arizona Field Office of the United States Bureau of Alcohol, Featured content Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), which ran a series Current events of sting operations[2][3] between 2006[4] and 2011[2][5] in the Random article Donate to Wikipedia Tucson and Phoenix area where the ATF "purposely allowed Wikimedia Shop licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers, hoping to track the guns to Mexican drug cartel Interaction leaders and arrest them."[6] These operations were done Help under the umbrella of Project Gunrunner, a project intended About Wikipedia Weapons recovered by Mexican military in Naco, Community portal to stem the flow of firearms into Mexico by interdicting straw Sonora, Mexico on November 20, 2009. They include Recent changes purchasers and gun traffickers within the United States.[7] The weapons bought two weeks earlier by Operation Fast and Contact page Chambers case[who?] began in October 2009, and eventually Furious suspect Uriel Patino, who bought 723 guns during the operation.[1] Tools became known in February 2010 as "Operation Fast and What links here Furious" after agents discovered some of the suspects under Related changes investigation belonged to a car club.[1] Upload file Special pages The stated goal of allowing
    [Show full text]
  • The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF): Budget and Operations for FY2011
    The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF): Budget and Operations for FY2011 William J. Krouse Specialist in Domestic Security and Crime Policy January 6, 2011 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R41206 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress ATF Budget and Operations for FY2011 Summary The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) is the lead federal law enforcement agency charged with administering and enforcing federal laws related to the manufacture, importation, and distribution of firearms and explosives. Congress transferred ATF’s enforcement and regulatory functions for firearms and explosives from the Department of the Treasury to the Department of Justice (DOJ) as part of the Homeland Security Act (P.L. 107-296). ATF is also responsible for investigating arson cases with a federal nexus, as well as criminal violations of federal laws governing the manufacture, importation, and distribution of alcohol and tobacco. Congress authorized appropriations for ATF in the Department of Justice Authorization Act of 2005 (P.L. 109-162) for FY2006 through FY2009; however, the 111th Congress did not consider legislation to reauthorize annual appropriations for DOJ or ATF. For three fiscal years, FY2008 through FY2010, Congress has provided about $49 million in program increases to address firearms trafficking. About $43 million of this funding has been allocated to Project Gunrunner, an ATF initiative to reduce gun trafficking across the Southwest border, or other projects to assist the government of Mexico. In the 110th Congress, the House passed a bill (H.R. 6028) that would have authorized appropriations over three years, for FY2008 through FY2010, of $73.5 million to increase ATF resources dedicated to stemming illegal gun trafficking into Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Women and Narco-Trafficking
    ii Mexico Acknowledgments iii iv Mexico Fourth printing 2011 Copyright © 2010 by Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, New Jersey. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photo- copy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher. All inquiries should be addressed to Transaction Publishers, Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey, 35 Berrue Circle, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854-8042. www.transactionpub.com This book is printed on acid-free paper that meets the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. Library of Congress Catalog Number: 2009029164 ISBN: 978-1-4128-1151-4 Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Grayson, George W., 1938- Mexico : narco-violence and a failed state? / George W. Grayson. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4128-1151-4 1. Drug traffic--Mexico. 2. Narco terrorism--Mexico. 3. Drug control--Mexico. 4. Mexico--Politics and government. 5. Mexico-- Economic conditions. I. Title. HV5840.M4G73 2009 363.450972--dc22 2009029164 Acknowledgments v Dedication To José Raúl Vera López, O.P., Bishop of Saltillo, Coahuila, and to Héctor González Martínez, Metropolitan Archbishop of Durango, for your courage in the face of personal danger, your readiness to condemn supposedly “untouchable” criminals and their enablers, and your inspirational commitment to uplifting the downtrodden. vi Mexico Acknowledgments vii Contents Acknowledgments ix Map of Mexico xv Map of Michoacán xvi Introduction 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Furious): the Nonexistent U.S
    University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform Volume 46 2012 Going Nowhere Fast (or Furious): The Nonexistent U.S. Firearms Trafficking Statute and the Rise of Mexican Drug Cartel Violence Stewart M. Young University of Wyoming College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Legislation Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Stewart M. Young, Going Nowhere Fast (or Furious): The Nonexistent U.S. Firearms Trafficking Statute and the Rise of Mexican Drug Cartel Violence, 46 U. MICH. J. L. REFORM 1 (2012). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjlr/vol46/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GOING NOWHERE "FAST" (OR "FURIOUS"): THE NONEXISTENT U.S. FIREARMS TRAFFICKING STATUTE AND THE RISE OF MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL VIOLENCE Stewart M. Young* Drug trafficking violence in Mexico, now reaching epidemic proportions, greatly impacts both the Mexican and United States governments. Despite the escalation of the "War on Drugs," drug traffickingfrom Mexico to the United States continues largely unabated, stifling tourism revenue and lawful economic opportunities, and causing violence previously unknown in Mexico. Thus far, the United States' ef- forts to deal with this drug trafficking and violence include the recent debacle of Operation Fast and Furious.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Southwest Border Security Initiatives
    AUGUST 2009 MEXICO INSTITUTE U.S. Southwest Border Security Initiatives This report lists some of the various projects, programs, and activities undertaken by the U.S. govern- ment to enhance security at the U.S.-Mexico border and to combat transnational contraband traffick- ing. Since the March 2009 announcement of a Southwest Border Security Initiative by the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. government has stepped up efforts to strengthen security along its Southwest Border out of concern for increasing drug trafficking violence afflicting northern Mexico. These efforts aimed to halt the flow of drugs, cash, and guns between both countries that is responsi- ble for much of this violence. This report is based entirely on U.S. government documents, and we have made no assessment of these initiatives. This compilation groups such initiatives by agency. 1 The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)2 The ONDCP is charged with overseeing executive-level anti-drug efforts and ensuring proper coordination of these efforts with local, tribal, and state authorities. In June 2009, the ONDCP announced a National Southwest Border Counternarcotics Strategy with the goal of “substan- tially reduc(ing) the flow of illicit drugs, drug proceeds, and associated instruments of violence Compiled by across the Southwest Border.” Several federal agencies are responsible for implementation of Miguel Salazar the new initiative which has the following objectives: * Enhance intelligence capabilities associated with the Southwest Border Edited by
    [Show full text]
  • US Firearms Trafficking to Mexico
    U.S. Firearms Trafficking to Mexico: New Data and Insights Illuminate Key Trends and Challenges Colby Goodman Michel Marizco Working Paper Series on U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation September 2010 1 Brief Project Description This Working Paper is the product of a joint project on U.S.-Mexico Security Cooperation coordinated by the Mexico Institute at the Woodrow Wilson Center and the Trans-Border Institute at the University of San Diego. As part of the project, several leading experts have been invited to prepare research papers that provide background on organized crime in Mexico, the United States, and Central America, and analyze specific challenges for cooperation between the United States and Mexico, including efforts to address the consumption of narcotics, money laundering, arms trafficking, intelligence sharing, police strengthening, judicial reform, and the protection of journalists. This working paper is being released in a preliminary form to inform the public about key issues in the public and policy debate about the best way to confront drug trafficking and organized crime. Together the working paper series will form the basis of a forthcoming edited volume. All papers, along with other background information and analysis, can be accessed online at The Mexico Institute and the Trans-Border Institute and are copyrighted to the author. The project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation. The views of the author do not represent an official position of the Woodrow Wilson Center or the University of San Diego. For questions related to the project, for media inquiries, or if you would like to contact the author please contact the project coordinator, Eric L.
    [Show full text]