DOCSLIB.ORG

Adolescent Mothers' Meaning Making and Mindset I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adolescent Mothers' Meaning Making and Mindset I MEANING MAKING AND MINDSET IN YOUNG MOTHERHOOD i “I Think Different Now”: Adolescent Mothers’ Meaning Making and Mindset in the Transition to Parenthood Dissertation submitted by Anne Bentley Waddoups, M.A. In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Child Study and Human Development Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development Tufts University August 2015 Dissertation Committee members: M. Ann Easterbrooks, Ph.D. (Chair) Jayanthi Mistry, Ph.D. Natalie Rusk, Ph.D. Gilda A. Morelli, Ph.D. MEANING MAKING AND MINDSET IN YOUNG MOTHERHOOD i Abstract Using a meaning making lens and a qualitative methodology, this dissertation study sought to explore transformative meaning making and implicit beliefs of parenting among a sample of 40 adolescent mothers participating in a home visiting program during their transition to parenthood. Given the high attrition rate for interventions serving adolescent moms, the study also explored the alignments between meaning making and home visiting program participation. Through iterative coding and theme analysis, this investigation revealed that participants’ beliefs about parenting evolve as they transition from pregnancy to parenting. They engage in meaning making throughout the process, which leads to scripts of change in three areas: improvements in relationships, changes in life outlook, and changes to self. Two groups emerged on either end of the spectrum of meaning making. High meaning-making transformers tended to remain actively enrolled in the intervention while the low meaning-making remainers all dropped out by the second year. An analysis of implicit beliefs about parenting, or meta-parenting mindset, identified three groups of participants: fixed theorists, incremental theorists, and mixed theorists. Fixed theorists, who believed parenting ability was natural or instinctual, had a lower retention rate in the program (14%) than the overall rate of the sample (42%) even after controlling for participants who moved away. Incremental theorists, who attributed their parenting abilities to gradual growth and learning, had a 50% retention rate and also represented just 6.6% of those receiving a low number of visits and 66.6% of those who had high rates of home visits. MEANING MAKING AND MINDSET IN YOUNG MOTHERHOOD ii Acknowledgements I completed this dissertation with generous doses of assistance and encouragement from my community. I could not have reached this point in my academic career without their unyielding support and would like to take this opportunity to extend my gratitude. First, I would like to thank and acknowledge my primary advisor, Dr. Ann Easterbrooks, who provided insightful guidance and shepherded me through both my masters and doctoral programs, encouraging my development as a scholar and connecting me with ideas and opportunities throughout my years at Tufts. Thank you, too, to Dr. Jayanthi Mistry. Her insights on methodology and meaning making have shaped this dissertation study—and my own understanding—for the better. Thank you to Dr. Natalie Rusk, who joined my committee after the untimely death of my advisor and mentor Fred Rothbaum. She is a thoughtful colleague, friend, and mentor of the highest caliber and I have been inspired and bettered through our association. Thank you to Dr. Gilda Morelli for generously giving her time and extensive expertise on parenting research. Her feedback and participation on this committee is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank the faculty and staff at Eliot Pearson Department of Child Study and Human Development. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Martha Pott—my first professor in the program as well as a mentor from whom I had the privilege of learning as her teaching assistant for several semesters. She is a model mentor and thoughtful teacher whose example I take with me and hope to emulate. I would also like to thank Dr. Francine Jacobs, who served on my qualifying committee and whose contributions helped shape the ideas that can be found within this dissertation. Finally, I owe a debt of gratitude to Dr. Martha Julia Sellers, who encouraged and championed me early in my doctoral career. I acknowledge the team of doctoral colleagues who navigated this process alongside me. Our discussions informed my evolving understanding of the world and your brightness and dedication to excellence continue to inspire me. Jessica Dym Bartlett, Jessica Greenstone, Melissa Orkin, Mallary Swartz—you are dear friends who made this experience more meaningful and enjoyable. Thanks for MEANING MAKING AND MINDSET IN YOUNG MOTHERHOOD iii your great humor, encouragement, and supportive friendship both within and outside of our academic programs. Thank you to my colleagues at Jumpstart, the Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth and other projects who helped me to draw important connections between research and practice and who inspire me in the way they are making a difference for children and families. A special thank you to Zero to Three for providing me the opportunity, support, and funding to connect with fantastic thinkers and doers around the country through their Leaders of the 21st Century Fellowship Program. A big thank you to my family for their unwavering confidence and support. Thank you to my parents, Marion and Carolyn Bentley, who provided a loving and magical base for my own young development and whose encouragement of following questions where they lead sparked my first curiosities in figuring out how people develop. Thank you to my children— Lauren Madeleine, and Sam—who went through a good portion of their youth studying alongside me at the kitchen table and who supported my pursuit of this degree with pride and enthusiasm. Finally, to Greg, the truest partner, friend, and champion a person could ever have. I could not have done this without your support and encouragement. Your faith in me has been a rock upon which the rest has been built. Finally, I would like to dedicate this work to Dr. Fred Rothbaum, my advisor, mentor, and teacher who passed away just as my ideas for this study were coming together. Fred was a thinker and teacher beyond compare; many of my questions about implicit theories and parenting evolved from intense conversations in his office where he urged me to think more deeply and connect the dots across theories and disciplines. Here’s to you, Fred. MEANING MAKING AND MINDSET IN YOUNG MOTHERHOOD iv Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. ii Table of Contents ................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ...........................................................................................................v Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................1 The Present Study ................................................................................................2 Using a Meaning Making Lens ............................................................................4 Research Questions ..............................................................................................7 Chapter 2: Review of the Literature.........................................................................8 Transition to Parenthood ......................................................................................9 Adolescent Mothers in the Transition to Parenthood ..................................9 Transitions Theory .....................................................................................11 Posttraumatic Growth and Meaning Making .............................................15 Parent Beliefs Research .....................................................................................21 Attachment and Parent Beliefs...................................................................22 Parent Cognitions .......................................................................................24 Parent Beliefs and Parenting Behavior ......................................................27 Parent Beliefs and Child Behavior .............................................................28 Attribution Theory Research..............................................................................29 Implicit Mindset Theory ............................................................................30 Parents as Learners: Meta-Parenting Mindset ...........................................40 Research on Interventions and Beliefs ...............................................................43 Interventions and Beliefs ...........................................................................44 Interventions and Parenting Beliefs ...........................................................46 Home Visiting Program Interventions ...............................................................50 Healthy Families ........................................................................................54 Program Retention .............................................................................................58 Healthy Families Program Retentions .......................................................59 Summary ............................................................................................................61
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How Modern Learning Resources Fail Conversational Programmers April Y
    Mismatch of Expectations: How Modern Learning Resources Fail Conversational Programmers April Y. Wang1, Ryan Mitts1, Philip J. Guo2, and Parmit K. Chilana1 1Computing Science 2Design Lab Simon Fraser University UC San Diego Burnaby, BC Canada La Jolla, CA USA {ayw7, rmitts, pchilana}@sfu.ca [email protected] ABSTRACT Conversational programmers represent a class of learners variety of learners, such as computer science (CS) students who are not required to write any code, yet try to learn pro- [17,28,53], end-user programmers [14,15,30,32] and profes- gramming to improve their participation in technical con- sional programmers [1,3,13]. A large focus of these projects versations. We carried out interviews with 23 conversation- has been on improving learners’ understanding of program- al programmers to better understand the challenges they ming syntax and logic and facilitating interaction with fea- face in technical conversations, what resources they choose ture-rich programming environments as these are known to to learn programming, how they perceive the learning pro- present key challenges for new learners. cess, and to what extent learning programming actually Unfortunately, most of what we know about the programming helps them. Among our key findings, we found that conver- learning process and the challenges that learners face is based sational programmers often did not know where to even on studies of students in the classroom [53] or professionals in begin the learning process and ended up using formal and industry [1]. Only recently have we started seeing studies into informal learning resources that focus largely on program- informal learning processes among non-traditional popula- ming syntax and logic.
    [Show full text]
  • The Computer Clubhouse: Helping Youth Develop Fluency with New Media
    The Computer Clubhouse: Helping Youth Develop Fluency with New Media Mitchel Resnick The Media Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02140 [email protected] http://www.media.rnit.edu/~mres/ Natalie Rusk Science Museum of Minnesota St. Paul, MN55101 [email protected] Abstract: The gap between the technological haves and have-nots is widening, leading to dangerous economic and cultural riftsin our society. But access to technology alone is not enough to bridge this gap. This paper describes a new model of a learning community, called the Computer Clubhouse, that breaks away from the traditional computer lab. At the Clubhouse, inner-city youth become designers and creators-not just consumers-of computer-based products. The paper describes four core principles of the Clubhouse educational approach-and discusses how the Clubhouse helps prepare today's youth for life and work in tomorrow's world. Introduction Ever since the personal computer was invented in the late 1970s, there have been concerns about inequities in access to this new technology [Piller, 1992]. Over the years, the gap between the technological haves and have­ nots has widened, leading to dangerous economic and cultural rifts in our society. In an effort to narrow these rifts, some groups have worked to acquire computers for inner-city schools. Other groups have opened community-access centers, recognizing that schools are not the only (or necessarily the best) place for learning to occur. At these community-access centers, members of inner-city communities (youth and adults alike) can use computers at little or no charge.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessible Tools and Curricula for K-12 Computer Science Education
    Accessible Tools and Curricula for K-12 Computer Science Education White paper from the Accessible Computer Science Education Fall Workshop (Draft for Review) November 17-19, 2020 Earl Huff, Clemson University Varsha Koushik, University of Colorado Richard E. Ladner, University of Washington Stephanie Ludi, University of North Texas Lauren Milne, Macalester College Aboubakar Mountapmbeme, University of North Texas Margaret Perkoff, University of Colorado Andreas Stefik, University of Nevada, Las Vegas Introduction Ladner Computer science is rapidly becoming an integral part of the K-12 school curriculum in the United States (US) and other countries. This white paper will focus on the US because we understand K-12 education better than in other countries. Since 1984, computer science has been part of the curriculum in schools that offered AP Computer Science A (CSA). This introduction to programming was originally taught using Pascal, then moved to C++ in 1999, and then Java in 2003. Since 2007, there has been a concerted effort by the National Science Foundation to bring computer science education to a much broader audience and to all levels in K-12. This includes all students regardless of gender, ethnicity, race, or disability. The effort began with Exploring Computer Science (ECS) which was a gentler introduction to computer science at the high school level. Shortly thereafter, the idea of an AP Computer Science Principles (CSP) course arose that was to be a gentler introduction to computer science than AP CSA with a college level equivalent, introductory computer science for non-majors. In 2016, AP CSP became a reality with 43,780 students taking the exam in spring 2017 and two years later that number rose to 94,361.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Human and Machine Intelligence for Enhanced Curriculum Design
    Integrating Human and Machine Intelligence for Enhanced Curriculum Design Shayan Doroudi CMU-CS-19-110 May 15, 2019 School of Computer Science Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Thesis Committee: Emma Brunskill, Chair Vincent Aleven Ken Koedinger Chinmay Kulkarni Eric Horvitz (Microsoft Research) Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Copyright © 2019 Shayan Doroudi This research was sponsored by the PIER Fellowship, Microsoft, Google, the Air Force Research Laboratory under grant number F87501720152, and the Department of Education under grant numbers R305A130215 and R305B150008. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of any sponsoring institution, the U.S. government or any other entity. Keywords: curriculum design, learnersourcing, content creation, reinforcement learning, in- structional sequencing, student modeling, model misspecification, bias-variance tradeoff If there is any good in these pages, it is for Fatima and her father and her husband and her two sons, peace and blessings be upon them. iv Abstract From the mechanical teaching machines of the early twentieth century to the wave of massive open online courses in recent years, many have been motivated by the dream of delivering a personalized adaptive curriculum to each learner. To achieve this dream, many researchers have focused on rule-based systems that rely on extensive domain expertise and psychological theories. While this approach has led to the development of successful intelligent tutoring systems with high quality content, (1) developing such systems can be very costly and (2) these systems typ- ically employ a very limited form of adaptive instructional sequencing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society
    Annual Report Academic Year 2016–2017 Contents I. Part One: Report of Activities .............................................................................................. 3 A. Summary of Academic Year: 2016–2017 ........................................................................ 3 1. Executive Summary ..................................................................................................... 3 2. Research, Scholarship and Project Activities ............................................................... 5 3. Contributions to HLS Teaching Program .....................................................................63 4. Participation of HLS Students in Program Activities ....................................................65 5. Faculty Participation ....................................................................................................65 6. Other Contributions to the HLS Community ................................................................66 7. Law Reform and Advocacy .........................................................................................66 8. Connections to the Profession ....................................................................................67 Research ...........................................................................................................................67 The Future of Digital Privacy ..............................................................................................67 Executive Education: Digital Security for Directors and Senior Executives
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehension First: Evaluating a Novel Pedagogy and Tutoring System for Program Tracing in CS1
    Session1: Novice Programmer ICER’17, August 18–20, 2017, Tacoma, WA, USA Comprehension First: Evaluating a Novel Pedagogy and Tutoring System for Program Tracing in CS1 Greg L. Nelson Benjamin Xie Andrew J. Ko University of Washington University of Washington University of Washington Allen School, DUB Group e Information School, DUB Group e Information School, DUB Group Seale, Washington 98195 Seale, Washington 98195 Seale, Washington 98195 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT building writing [17, 39, 68] and visualization tools [29, 34, 34, What knowledge does learning programming require? Prior work 57, 81, 87, 91]. Pedagogy has also evolved, reordering [23, 61, 80, has focused on theorizing program writing and problem solving 84, 85] and changing what is taught [14, 50, 72], rening worked skills. We examine program comprehension and propose a formal examples [58], explicitly teaching problem solving [48, 61] and theory of program tracing knowledge based on control ow paths program design [27], and exploring a discovery pedagogy [46]. through an interpreter program’s source code. Because novices Most of these diverse approaches have been evaluated in a writ- cannot understand the interpreter’s programming language nota- ing-focused pedagogical context. People receive instruction on a tion, we transform it into causal relationships from code tokens to programming construct’s syntax and semantics, practice by writing instructions to machine state changes. To teach this knowledge, code, then advance to the next construct (roughly a spiral syn- we propose a comprehension-rst pedagogy based on causal infer- tax approach [76]). In contrast, lile prior work has explored a ence, by showing, explaining, and assessing each path by stepping comprehension-rst pedagogy, teaching program semantics—how through concrete examples within many example programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshia Sackey
    Jiradi: Reflective Documentation to Support Learning and Skills Development by Marian Mwikali Muthui B.Sc. Mechanical Engineering, University of Nairobi (2014) Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Media Arts and Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 2020 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2020. All rights reserved. Author​ ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Program in Media Arts and Sciences May 19, 2020 Certified by​ ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Mitchel Resnick LEGO Papert Professor of Learning Research Program in Media Arts and Sciences Thesis Advisor Accepted by​ ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… Tod Machover Academic Head, Program in Media Arts and Sciences 2 Jiradi: Reflective Documentation to Support Learning and Skills Development by Marian Mwikali Muthui Submitted to the Program in Media Arts and Sciences, School of Architecture and Planning, on May 19, 2020 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Media Arts and Sciences Abstract In creative learning, reflection encourages learners to think critically about their experiences and helps to generate new ideas, insights, and outlooks. Maker practices recommend documentation, typically in the form of digital portfolios, as a method to encourage reflection. Documentation can serve two important roles: as a tool to support personal reflection about your learning experience and as a sharable record to showcase your skills development. Unfortunately, there are not currently any documentation tools that are optimized to support both personal reflection and skills development. In this thesis, I introduce “​reflective documentation​” -- a term that I use to describe digital documentation tools that adopt a process-oriented approach to support both personal reflection and skills development.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Creative Learning: Designing Structures to Engage Kids and Parents As Computational Creators
    Family Creative Learning: Designing Structures to Engage Kids and Parents as Computational Creators Ricarose Roque S.M., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2012) M.Eng., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2007) S.B., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2006) Submitted to the Department of Media Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September 2016 ©Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2016. All rights reserved. Author......................................................... Department of Media Arts and Sciences August 5, 2016 Certified by . Mitchel Resnick LEGO Papert Learning Professor Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Pattie Maes Academic Head Family Creative Learning: Designing Structures to Engage Kids and Parents as Computational Creators Ricarose Roque Submitted to the Department of Media Arts and Sciences on August 5, 2016, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Media Arts and Sciences Abstract The ability to create, design, and express oneself with technology is an important fluency for full participation in today’s digitally medi- ated society. Social support can play a major role in engaging and deepening what young people can learn and do with technology. In particular, parents can play many roles, such as being collaborators, resource providers, and co-learners with their kids. In this dissertation, I explore the possibilities of engaging kids and their families as computational creators – people who can create things they care about with computing, see themselves as creators, and imag- ine the ways they can shape their world. I especially focus on families with limited access to resources and social support around comput- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Research Network
    THETHE CONNECTEDCONNECTED LEARNINGLEARNING CVCV RESEARCHRESEARCH NETWORKNETWORK ReflectionsReflections onon aa DecadeDecade ofof EngagedEngaged ScholarshipScholarship WrittenWritten by: by: MizukoMizuko Ito Ito RichardRichard Arum Arum DaltonDalton Conley Conley KrisKris Guttiérez Guttiérez BenBen Kirshner Kirshner SoniaSonia Livingstone Livingstone VeraVera Michalchik Michalchik WilliamWilliam Penuel Penuel KylieKylie Peppler Peppler NicholeNichole Pinkard Pinkard JeanJean Rhodes Rhodes KatieKatie Salen Salen Tekinbaş Tekinbaş JulietJuliet Schor Schor JulianJulian Sefton-Green Sefton-Green S.S. Craig Craig Watkins Watkins withwith contributions contributions from: from: AliciaAlicia Blum-Ross Blum-Ross LindseyLindsey “Luka” “Luka” Carfagna Carfagna CrystleCrystle Martin Martin R.R. Mishael Mishael Sedas Sedas NatNat Soti Soti This edition of The Connected Learning Research Network: Reflections on a Decade of Engaged Scholarship is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Unported 3.0 License (CC BY 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/ ISBN-13: 978-0-9887255-6-0 Published by the Connected Learning Alliance. Irvine, CA. February 2020. Portions of this report were originally published in Ito et al. 2013. A full-text PDF of this report is available as a free download from https://clalliance.org/publications/ Cover art by Nat Soti Suggested citation: Ito, Mizuko, Richard Arum, Dalton Conley, Kris Gutiérrez, Ben Kirshner, Sonia Livingstone, Vera Michalchik, William Penuel, Kylie Peppler, Nichole Pinkard, Jean Rhodes, Katie Salen
    [Show full text]
  • Coding at a Crossroads
    contributed articles DOI:10.1145/3375546 and approaches—that is the big chal- While millions of students worldwide have lenge for the next decade. The expansion of coding in educa- enjoyed coding experiences over the last tion has been catalyzed by new types of decade, the next challenge is spreading programming interfaces (particularly educational values and approaches. block-based coding1), a proliferation of nonprofit initiatives supporting com- puter-science education (such as Code. BY MITCHEL RESNICK AND NATALIE RUSK org, CSforAll, and Code Club), and a growing array of programmable devic- es that broaden the range of what stu- dents can code (such as micro:bit,20 ro- botics kits,9 and programmable toys23). Coding at Our own work on Scratch (Figure 1) has both contributed to and benefitted from this broader trend. When we started developing the Scratch pro- a Crossroads gramming language and online com- munity in 2002, our goal was not sim- ply to help children learn to code. We had a broader educational mission. We wanted to provide all children, from all backgrounds, with opportunities to learn to think creatively, reason system- atically, and work collaboratively. These THE EDUCATIONAL USE of coding in schools is at skills are essential for everyone in to- day’s fast-changing world, not just a crossroads. those planning to become engineers We are at a moment of extraordinary opportunity. and computing professionals. And A decade ago, our research group wrote an article these same skills are valuable in all as- pects of life, not just for success in the for Communications titled “Scratch: Programming workplace but also for personal fulfill- for All.”15 At the time, our subtitle was aspirational.
    [Show full text]
  • The Educational Power of Children Making and Sharing Digital Creations
    Photo: Scratchfoundation.org WHITE PAPER Learning through Digital Play: The Educational Power of Children Making and Sharing Digital Creations James H. Gray, Ed.D., Research Scientist, MIT Media Lab Bo Stjerne Thomsen, Ph.D., Chair of Learning through Play, 2021 Table of contents Table of contents Acknowledgements • 3 Executive summary • 4 Section 1: Introduction • 9 1.1 Introduction • 9 1.2 Methodology • 11 1.3 Design Principles: Agency, guidance, creation, playfulness • 12 Section 2: Platforms • 15 2.1 Scratch • 16 2.2 Minecraft • 22 2.3 LEGO® MINDSTORMS® • 30 Section 3: Applying the design principles: digital storytelling • 40 Section 4: Conclusions • 44 4.1 What are the benefits of learning through digital play? • 45 4.2 How can adults facilitate children’s learning through digital play? • 47 4.3 Recommendations for educators • 47 4.4 Recommendations for designers • 48 4.5 Future directions • 49 Appendix • 50 References • 51 2 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements This study was authored by James H. Gray, Research and Juliana Nazaré. The authors would like to thank Scientist at the MIT Media Lab, and Bo Stjerne Thom- several colleagues in particular for their contributions sen, Chair of Learning through Play at the LEGO Foun- in developing the ideas expressed here, including Mitch dation. Comments on the report have been gratefully Resnick and Natalie Rusk at the MIT Media Lab, and Elis- received from Seeta Pai, Mitch Resnick, Natalie Rusk, abeth McClure, Christina Witcomb, Ollie Bray and Søren Marina Umaschi Bers, Deirdre Quarnstrom, Sara Cor- Holm of the LEGO Foundation. nish, Brian Jaquet, Genevieve Johnson, Brian Alspach, Ben Courtney, Kevin Andersen, Nancy Boyer, Libby We are grateful for each person’s time and gracious Simpson, Kim Wierman, Ivan Sysoev, Anneli Rane Woolf attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Wescratch: an Inclusive, Playful Learning Online and Collaborative Approach to Creative Learning Online Carmelo Presicce, Rupal Jain, Carolina Rodeghiero, Lily E
    The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available on Emerald Insight at: https://www.emerald.com/insight/2398-5348.htm Creative WeScratch: an inclusive, playful learning online and collaborative approach to creative learning online Carmelo Presicce, Rupal Jain, Carolina Rodeghiero, Lily E. Gabaree 695 and Natalie Rusk Received 13 April 2020 Lifelong Kindergarten Group, Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Revised 9 May 2020 Cambridge, MA, USA 31 May 2020 2June2020 Accepted 3 June 2020 Abstract Purpose – Many educators currently face challenges when trying to engage students in creative learning experiences online, where it can be particularly difficult to move beyond the transmissive approach typical of video lessons and webinars. The purpose of this paper is to present WeScratch, online workshops designed as welcoming, playful and peer-supported spaces where educators can experience first-hand an alternative approach to learning online, as they actively learn to create projects using the Scratch programming language. Design/methodology/approach – The WeScratch experience is designed as a hands-on, creative online workshop where participants spend most of their time making projects while they share ideas with peers. The authors describe the structure, platform, facilitation and activities of WeScratch workshops, highlighting the main design choices and their underlying motivations. Findings – This study discusses how this environment has engaged educators from around the world to experiment with Scratch in a playful way. The authors give examples of how educators have described the value of the experience, both as learners developing their skills and as designers developing similar learning experiences for their students.
    [Show full text]