DOCSLIB.ORG

Správa O Činnosti Organizácie SAV Za Rok 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Správa O Činnosti Organizácie SAV Za Rok 2014 Botanický ústav SAV Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV za rok 2014 Bratislava január 2015 Obsah osnovy Správy o činnosti organizácie SAV za rok 2014 Strana 1. Základné údaje o organizácii........................................................................... 1 2. Vedecká činnos ť.............................................................................................. 3 3. Doktorandské štúdium, iná pedagogická činnos ť a budovanie ľudských zdrojov pre vedu a techniku............................................................................. 27 4. Medzinárodná vedecká spolupráca.................................................................. 34 5. Vedná politika.................................................................................................. 42 6. Spolupráca s VŠ a inými subjektmi v oblasti vedy a techniky v SR............... 44 7. Spolupráca s aplika čnou a hospodárskou sférou............................................. 50 8. Aktivity pre Národnú radu SR, vládu SR, ústredné orgány štátnej správy SR a iné organizácie............................................................................................. 51 9. Vedecko-organiza čné a populariza čné aktivity............................................... 57 10. Činnos ť knižni čno-informa čného pracoviska.................................................. 69 11. Aktivity v orgánoch SAV................................................................................ 71 12. Hospodárenie organizácie................................................................................ 72 13. Nadácie a fondy pri organizácii SAV.............................................................. 74 14. Iné významné činnosti organizácie SAV......................................................... 74 15. Vyznamenania, ocenenia a ceny udelené pracovníkom organizácie SAV...... 77 16. Poskytovanie informácií v súlade so zákonom o slobodnom prístupe k informáciám.................................................................................................... 77 17. Problémy a podnety pre činnos ť SAV ............................................................ 77 PRÍLOHY A Zoznam zamestnancov a doktorandov organizácie k 31.12.2013 ..................... 80 B Projekty riešené v organizácii ........................................................................... 85 C Publika čná činnos ť organizácie........................................................................ 118 D Údaje o pedagogickej činnosti organizácie ...................................................... 285 E Medzinárodná mobilita organizácie ................................................................. 290 Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV 1. Základné údaje o organizácii 1.1. Kontaktné údaje Názov: Botanický ústav SAV Riadite ľ: RNDr. Ivan Jarolímek, CSc. (do 1.10.2014), Mgr. Anna Guttová, PhD. (od 1.10.2014) Zástupca riadite ľa: doc. RNDr. Igor Mistrík, CSc. (do 1.10.2014), RNDr. Milan Valachovi č, CSc. (od 1.10.2014) Vedecký tajomník: Ing. Jaromír Ku čera, PhD. Predseda Vedeckej rady: prof. RNDr. Karol Marhold, CSc. Členovia Snemu SAV: prof. RNDr. Karol Marhold, CSc. (člen – do 18.12.2014, predseda – od 18.12.2014) Adresa: Dúbravská cesta 9, 845 23 Bratislava 4 http://ibot.sav.sk Tel.: 02/ 59426 111; Fax: 02/ 5477 1948; E-mail: [email protected] Názvy a adresy detašovaných pracovísk: • Detašované pracovisko Botanického ústavu SAV v Banskej Bystrici Ďumbierska 1, 97411 Banská Bystrica • Detašované pracovisko Botanického ústavu SAV vo Zvolene Ústav ekológie lesa SAV, Štúrova 2, 960 53 Zvolen • Detašované pracovisko Botanického ústavu SAV v Nitre Ústav genetiky a biotechnológií rastlín, Akademická 2, 950 07 Nitra Vedúci detašovaných pracovísk: • Detašované pracovisko Botanického ústavu SAV v Banskej Bystrici RNDr. Barbora Šingliarová, PhD. • Detašované pracovisko Botanického ústavu SAV vo Zvolene Ing. Richard Hrivnák, PhD. • Detašované pracovisko Botanického ústavu SAV v Nitre Mgr. Slavomír Adam čík, PhD. Typ organizácie: Rozpo čtová od roku 1990 1.2. Údaje o zamestnancoch Tabu ľka 1a Po čet a štruktúra zamestnancov K K do 35 Štruktúra zamestnancov K rokov F P T M Ž M Ž Celkový po čet zamestnancov 105 35 70 7 21 86 80,15 48,11 Vedeckí pracovníci 64 28 36 4 15 49 46,81 42,31 Odborní pracovníci VŠ 18 4 14 2 6 14 13,38 5,8 Odborní pracovníci ÚS 17 1 16 0 0 17 16,46 0 Ostatní pracovníci 6 2 4 1 0 6 3,5 0 K – kme ňový stav zamestnancov v pracovnom pomere k 31.12.2014 (uvádza ť zamestnancov v 1 Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV pracovnom pomere, vrátane riadnej materskej dovolenky, zamestnancov pôsobiacich v zahrani čí, v štátnych funkciách, členov Predsedníctva SAV, zamestnancov pôsobiacich v zastupite ľských zboroch) F – fyzický stav zamestnancov k 31.12.2014 (bez riadnej materskej dovolenky, zamestnancov pôsobiacich v zahrani čí v štátnych funkciách, členov Predsedníctva SAV, zamestnancov pôsobiacich v zastupite ľských zboroch) P – celoro čný priemerný prepo čítaný po čet zamestnancov T – celoro čný priemerný prepo čítaný po čet riešite ľov projektov M, Ž – muži, ženy Tabu ľka 1b Štruktúra vedeckých pracovníkov (kme ňový stav k 31.12.2014) Rodová Pracovníci s hodnos ťou Vedeckí pracovníci v stup ňoch skladba DrSc. CSc./PhD. prof. doc. I. IIa. IIb. Muži 2 26 3 1 4 15 9 Ženy 1 35 0 0 3 13 20 Tabu ľka 1c Štruktúra pracovníkov pod ľa veku a rodu, ktorí sú riešite ľmi projektov Veková štruktúra < 31 31-35 36-40 41-45 46-50 51-55 56-60 61-65 > 65 (roky) Muži 1 1 5 4 2 1 3 2 2 Ženy 5 5 2 4 2 1 2 3 5 Tabu ľka 1d Priemerný vek zamestnancov organizácie k 31.12.2014 Kme ňoví zamestnanci Vedeckí pracovníci Riešitelia projektov Muži 45,0 46,5 48,7 Ženy 46,9 44,3 46,8 Spolu 46,2 45,2 47,6 1.3. Iné dôležité informácie k základným údajom o organizácii a zmeny za posledné obdobie (v zameraní, v organiza čnej štruktúre a pod.) žiadne 2 Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV 2. Vedecká činnos ť 2.1. Domáce projekty Tabu ľka 2a Po čet domácich projektov riešených v roku 2014 Čerpané financie Po čet projektov za rok 2014 (v €) ŠTRUKTÚRA PROJEKTOV A A B pre B spolu organi- záciu 1. Vedecké projekty, ktoré boli 22 2 153 384 153 384 3 272 r. 2014 financované VEGA 2. Projekty, ktoré boli r. 2014 3 1 66 294 66 294 10 710 financované APVV 3. Projekty OP ŠF 0 0 - - - 4. Projekty centier excelentnosti SAV 0 0 - - - 5. Iné projekty (FM EHP, ŠPVV, Vedecko-technické projekty, ESF, 0 0 - - - na objednávku rezortov a pod.) A - organizácia je nosite ľom projektu B - organizácia sa zmluvne podie ľa na riešení projektu Tabu ľka 2b Po čet návrhov domácich projektov podaných v roku 2014 Štruktúra projektov Miesto podania Organizácia je Organizácia sa nosite ľom zmluvne podie ľa projektu na riešení projektu 1. Ú čas ť na nových výzvach APVV - 3 3 r. 2014 2. Projekty výziev OP ŠF Bratislava - - podané r. 2014 Regióny - - Názov a kód žiadosti: Evolu čné vz ťahy, diverzifikácia a biogeografické prepojenia západokarpatskej mykobioty, APVV-14-0214 Podávate ľ: Botanický ústav SAV, Anna Guttová Partneri: Technická univerzita vo Zvolene – Fakulta ekológie a environmentalistiky, Prírodovedecká fakulta UK Stav: v procese posudzovania Názov a kód žiadosti: Európsky významné travinno-bylinné biotopy - klasifikácia, diverzita, dynamika a manažment, APVV-14-0008 Podávate ľ: Botanický ústav SAV, Monika Janišová Partneri: Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, Technická univerzita vo Zvolene Stav: v procese posudzovania 3 Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV Názov a kód žiadosti : Od malých vodných nádrží k ešte menším: neznáme centrá akvatickej biodiverzity v priestore a čase, APVV-14-0238 Podávate ľ: Technická univerzita vo Zvolene Partneri : Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici, Botanický ústav SAV v Bratislave (R. Hrivnák, K. Bubíková), Prešovská univerzita v Prešove Stav: v procese posudzovania Názov a kód žiadosti : Druhová bohatos ť rastlín v slatinných jelšinách – multiškálový prístup, APVV-14-0106 Podávate ľ: Katolícka univerzita v Ružomberku Partneri: Botanický ústav SAV v Bratislave (R. Hrivnák, I. Jarolímek), Ústav ekológie lesa SAV, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave Stav: v procese posudzovania Názov a kód žiadosti: Vývoj lesných ekosystémov pod vplyvom sú časných globálnych a regionálnych zmien a spolo čenský presah výsledkov na príklade zonácie národných parkov. APVV- 14-0447. Podávate ľ: Botanický ústav SAV, RNDr. Jozef Šibík, PhD. Partneri: Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave – Botanická záhrada Blatnica; Štátne Lesy Tatranského Národného Parku, Tatranská Lomnica; Národné lesnícke centrum, Zvolen; Univerzita Mateja Bela v Banskej Bystrici - Fakulta prírodných vied, Banská Bystrica; Ústav ekológie lesa SAV, Zvolen. Stav: v procese posudzovania Názov a kód žiadosti: Rastlinné synaptotagmíny a ich úloha v tolerancii na stresy. APVV-14-0491. Podávate ľ: Prírodovedecká fakulta UK, Bratislava. Partneri: Botanický ústav SAV (Mgr. Roderik Fiala, PhD., RNDr. Ján Pavlovkin, CSc.) Stav: v procese posudzovania 4 Správa o činnosti organizácie SAV 2.2. Medzinárodné projekty 2.2.1. Medzinárodné projekty riešené v roku 2014 Tabu ľka 2c Po čet medzinárodných projektov riešených v roku 2014 Čerpané financie Po čet projektov za rok 2014 (v €) ŠTRUKTÚRA PROJEKTOV A A B pre B spolu organi- záciu 1. Projekty 7. Rámcového programu EÚ 0 1 - - 47 407 2. Multilaterálne projekty v rámci vedeckých programov COST, ERANET, INTAS, EUREKA, 1 2 - - 14 022 ESPRIT, PHARE, NATO, UNESCO, CERN, IAEA, ESF (European Science Foundation), ERDF a iné 3. Projekty v rámci medzivládnych dohôd o vedecko-technickej 0 0 - - - spolupráci 4. Bilaterálne projekty 7 2 - 1 484
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016
    Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Revised February 24, 2017 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org C ur Alleghany rit Ashe Northampton Gates C uc Surry am k Stokes P d Rockingham Caswell Person Vance Warren a e P s n Hertford e qu Chowan r Granville q ot ui a Mountains Watauga Halifax m nk an Wilkes Yadkin s Mitchell Avery Forsyth Orange Guilford Franklin Bertie Alamance Durham Nash Yancey Alexander Madison Caldwell Davie Edgecombe Washington Tyrrell Iredell Martin Dare Burke Davidson Wake McDowell Randolph Chatham Wilson Buncombe Catawba Rowan Beaufort Haywood Pitt Swain Hyde Lee Lincoln Greene Rutherford Johnston Graham Henderson Jackson Cabarrus Montgomery Harnett Cleveland Wayne Polk Gaston Stanly Cherokee Macon Transylvania Lenoir Mecklenburg Moore Clay Pamlico Hoke Union d Cumberland Jones Anson on Sampson hm Duplin ic Craven Piedmont R nd tla Onslow Carteret co S Robeson Bladen Pender Sandhills Columbus New Hanover Tidewater Coastal Plain Brunswick THE COUNTIES AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC PROVINCES OF NORTH CAROLINA Natural Heritage Program List of Rare Plant Species of North Carolina 2016 Compiled by Laura Gadd Robinson, Botanist John T. Finnegan, Information Systems Manager North Carolina Natural Heritage Program N.C. Department of Natural and Cultural Resources Raleigh, NC 27699-1651 www.ncnhp.org This list is dynamic and is revised frequently as new data become available. New species are added to the list, and others are dropped from the list as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of BA and GA on the Shoot Multiplication of in Vitro
    FOLIA HORTICULTURAE Folia Hort. 23/2 (2011): 145-149 Published by the Polish Society DOI: 10.2478/v10245-011-0022-5 for Horticultural Science since 1989 The effect of BA and GA3 on the shoot multiplication of in vitro cultures of Polish wild roses Bożena Pawłowska Department of Ornamental Plants University of Agriculture in Krakow 29 Listopada 54, 31-425 Kraków, Poland e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The experiment was conducted using five species of roses naturally occurring in Poland:Rosa agrestis (fieldbriar rose), R. canina (dog rose), R. dumalis (glaucous dog rose), R. rubiginosa (sweetbriar rose), and R. tomentosa (whitewooly rose), from the in vitro collection of the Department of Ornamental Plants of the University of Agriculture in Kraków. We examined the effect of cytokinin BA (1-10 µM) added to an MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) on auxiliary shoot multiplication. The second group of test media contained BA (1-5 µM) and gibberellin GA3 (0.3-1.5 µM). The cultures were maintained at a phytotron temperature of 23/25°C (night/ day), 80% relative humidity, with a 16-hour photoperiod and PPFD of 30 µmol m-2 s-1, and cultured in five-week cycles. The highest multiplication rate was obtained for R. canina and R. rubiginosa (4.1 shoots per one explant) and R. dumalis (2.9 shoots per one explant), when shoots were multiplied on an MS medium supplemented with 1 µM BA and 1.5 µM GA3. Multiplication was the weakest in Rosa tomentosa independent of the medium used. Key words: Polish wild roses, auxiliary shoots, multiplication INTRODUCTION obtained plant material, whereas only a few studies have reported successful somatic embryogenesis In vitro cultures are one of the key tools in plant (Roy et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Information
    Current Survey Introduced Flora Records Vegetation Condition *Acetosa vesicaria Excellent 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 536,000 mE 536,000 537,000 mE 537,000 534,000 mE 534,000 mE 535,000 534,000 mE 534,000
    [Show full text]
  • Survey for Special-Status Vascular Plant Species
    SURVEY FOR SPECIAL-STATUS VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES For the proposed Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Project Tehama and Shasta Counties, California Prepared for: Tehama Environmental Solutions 910 Main Street, Suite D Red Bluff, California 96080 Prepared by: Dittes & Guardino Consulting P.O. Box 6 Los Molinos, California 96055 (530) 384-1774 [email protected] Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Improvement Project - Botany Report Sept. 12, 2018 Prepared by: Dittes & Guardino Consulting 1 SURVEY FOR SPECIAL-STATUS VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES Eagle Canyon Fish Passage Project Shasta & Tehama Counties, California T30N, R1W, SE 1/4 Sec. 25, SE1/4 Sec. 24, NE ¼ Sec. 36 of the Shingletown 7.5’ USGS Topographic Quadrangle TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 4 II. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 III. Project Description ............................................................................................................................................... 4 IV. Location .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 V. Methods ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Vascular Flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center, Tulsa County, Oklahoma
    Oklahoma Native Plant Record 29 Volume 13, December 2013 A CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF THE MARY K. OXLEY NATURE CENTER, TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Amy K. Buthod Oklahoma Biological Survey Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Robert Bebb Herbarium University of Oklahoma Norman, OK 73019-0575 (405) 325-4034 Email: [email protected] Keywords: flora, exotics, inventory ABSTRACT This paper reports the results of an inventory of the vascular flora of the Mary K. Oxley Nature Center in Tulsa, Oklahoma. A total of 342 taxa from 75 families and 237 genera were collected from four main vegetation types. The families Asteraceae and Poaceae were the largest, with 49 and 42 taxa, respectively. Fifty-eight exotic taxa were found, representing 17% of the total flora. Twelve taxa tracked by the Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory were present. INTRODUCTION clayey sediment (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1977). Climate is Subtropical The objective of this study was to Humid, and summers are humid and warm inventory the vascular plants of the Mary K. with a mean July temperature of 27.5° C Oxley Nature Center (ONC) and to prepare (81.5° F). Winters are mild and short with a a list and voucher specimens for Oxley mean January temperature of 1.5° C personnel to use in education and outreach. (34.7° F) (Trewartha 1968). Mean annual Located within the 1,165.0 ha (2878 ac) precipitation is 106.5 cm (41.929 in), with Mohawk Park in northwestern Tulsa most occurring in the spring and fall County (ONC headquarters located at (Oklahoma Climatological Survey 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Risk Management Proposal, Partial Review of Malus Import
    Risk Management Proposal: Partial review of Malus import requirements in the Importation of Nursery Stock Import Health Standard (155.02.06) FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION November 2020 Plant Germplasm Imports Animal & Plant Health Directorate Ministry for Primary Industries Pastoral House 25 The Terrace PO Box 2526 Wellington 6140 New Zealand Tel: +64 4 894 0100 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Page Submissions 1 Purpose 2 Objective 2 Background 2 Risk management approach 4 Proposed requirements for post entry quarantine 8 Appendix 1 14 i Submissions The Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) invites comment from interested parties on proposed changes to import requirements in the Malus schedule in the import health standard (IHS) 155.02.061: Importation of Nursery Stock, which is supported by this risk management proposal. The purpose of an import health standard is defined as follows in section 22(1) of the Biosecurity Act 1993 (the Act): “An import health standard specifies requirements that must be met to effectively manage risks associated with importing risk goods, including risks arising because importing the goods involves or might involve an incidentally imported new organism”. In accordance with Section 23 of the Act, MPI must consult with interested parties before issuing or amending IHS under section 24A of the Act. Therefore, MPI therefore seeks formal comment on the proposed import requirements. The following points may be of assistance in preparing comments: • Wherever possible, comments should be specific to a particular section/requirement of the IHS; • Where possible, reasons, data and supporting published references to support comments are requested. • The use of examples to illustrate particular points is encouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Development Vegetation and Flora Survey
    JANUARY 2012 BROCKMAN RESOURCES LIMITED RAIL DEVELOPMENT VEGETATION AND FLORA SURVEY This page has been left blank intentionally BROCKMAN RESOURCES LIMITED RAIL DEVELOPMENT VEGETATION AND FLORA SURVEY Brockman Resources Limited Vegetation and Flora Survey Rail Corridor Document Status Approved for Issue Rev Author Reviewer Date Name Distributed To Date A Rochelle Renee 02/12/2011 Carol Macpherson Glenn Firth 02/12/2011 Haycock Tuckett Carol Macpherson B Carol 21.12.11 Carol Macpherson Glen Firth 23.12.11 Macpherson ecologia Environment (2011). Reproduction of this report in whole or in part by electronic, mechanical or chemical means including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, in any language, is strictly prohibited without the express approval of Brockman Resources Limited and/or ecologia Environment. Restrictions on Use This report has been prepared specifically for Brockman Resources Limited. Neither the report nor its contents may be referred to or quoted in any statement, study, report, application, prospectus, loan, or other agreement document, without the express approval of Brockman Resources Limited and/or ecologia Environment. ecologia Environment 1025 Wellington Street WEST PERTH WA 6005 Phone: 08 9322 1944 Fax: 08 9322 1599 Email: [email protected] December 2011 i Brockman Resources Limited Vegetation and Flora Survey Rail Corridor TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Register
    NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER VOLUME 35 ● ISSUE 23 ● Pages 2465 – 2648 June 1, 2021 I. EXECUTIVE ORDERS Executive Orders No. 209-213 ........................................................................ 2465 – 2515 II. PROPOSED RULES Health and Human Services, Department of Child Care Commission .................................................................................. 2516 – 2517 Health Benefits, Division of ........................................................................... 2517 – 2519 Public Health, Commission for ....................................................................... 2519 – 2522 Insurance, Department of Code Officials Qualification Board ................................................................ 2522 – 2524 Public Safety, Department of Private Protective Services Board ................................................................... 2524 – 2526 Environmental Quality, Department of Public Health, Commission for ....................................................................... 2526 – 2535 Occupational Licensing Boards and Commissions Chiropractic Examiners, Board of .................................................................. 2535 – 2541 Funeral Service, Board of ............................................................................... 2541 – 2543 III. APPROVED RULES ........................................................................................ 2544 – 2637 Agriculture and Consumer Services, Department of Plant Conservation Board Commerce, Department of Commerce - Employment
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration Fremontia Vol
    VOL. 48, NO.1 NOVEMBER 2020 RESTORATION FREMONTIA VOL. 48, NO.1, NOVEMBER 2020 FROM THE EDITORS What kind of world do we want, and how do we get there? These are Protecting California’s native flora since the questions that drive restoration, the central theme of this issue. They 1965 are also the questions that have led the California Native Plant Society Our mission is to conserve California’s native leadership to initiate an important change to this publication, which will plants and their natural habitats, and increase take effect in the spring 2021 issue. understanding, appreciation, and horticultural The name of this publication, Fremontia, has been a point of concern use of native plants. and discussion since last winter, when members of the CNPS leader- ship learned some disturbing facts about John C. Frémont, from whom Copyright ©2020 dozens of North American plants, including the flannelbush plant California Native Plant Society Fremontodendron californicum, derive their names. According to multi- ISSN 0092-1793 (print) ple sources, including the State of California Native American Heritage ISSN 2572-6870 (online) Commission, Frémont was responsible for brutal massacres of Native Americans in the Sacramento Valley and Klamath Lake. As a consequence, The views expressed by the authors in this issue do not necessarily represent policy or proce- the CNPS board of directors voted unanimously to rename Fremontia, a dure of CNPS. process slated for completion by the end of 2020. The decision to rename Fremontia, a name that dates back to the ori- gins of the publication in 1973, is about the people who have been—and 2707 K Street, Suite 1 continue to be—systematically excluded from the conservation commu- Sacramento, CA 95816-5130 nity.
    [Show full text]
  • Este Trabalho Não Teria Sido Possível Sem O Contributo De Algumas Pessoas Para As Quais Uma Palavra De Agradecimento É Insufi
    AGRADECIMENTOS Este trabalho não teria sido possível sem o contributo de algumas pessoas para as quais uma palavra de agradecimento é insuficiente para aquilo que representaram nesta tão importante etapa. O meu mais sincero obrigado, Ao Nuno e à minha filha Constança, pelo apoio, compreensão e estímulo que sempre me deram. Aos meus pais, Gaspar e Fátima, por toda a força e apoio. Aos meus orientadores da Dissertação de Mestrado, Professor Doutor António Xavier Pereira Coutinho e Doutora Catarina Schreck Reis, a quem eu agradeço todo o empenho, paciência, disponibilidade, compreensão e dedicação que por mim revelaram ao longo destes meses. À Doutora Palmira Carvalho, do Museu Nacional de História Natural/Jardim Botânico da Universidade de Lisboa por todo o apoio prestado na identificação e reconhecimento dos líquenes recolhidos na mata. Ao Senhor Arménio de Matos, funcionário do Jardim Botânico da Universidade de Coimbra, por todas as vezes que me ajudou na identificação de alguns espécimes vegetais. Aos meus colegas e amigos, pela troca de ideias, pelas explicações, pela força, apoio logístico, etc. I ÍNDICE RESUMO V ABSTRACT VI I. INTRODUÇÃO 1.1. Enquadramento 1 1.2. O clima mediterrânico e a vegetação 1 1.3. Origens da vegetação portuguesa 3 1.4. Objetivos da tese 6 1.5. Estrutura da tese 7 II. A SANTA CASA DA MISERICÓRDIA DE ARGANIL E A MATA DO HOSPITAL 2.1. Breve perspetiva histórica 8 2.2. A Mata do Hospital 8 2.2.1. Localização, limites e vias de acesso 8 2.2.2. Fatores Edafo-Climáticos-Hidrológicos 9 2.2.3.
    [Show full text]
  • CBD First National Report
    FIRST NATIONAL REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY July 2010 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 3 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... 4 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Geographic Profile .......................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate Profile ...................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Population Profile ................................................................................................. 7 2.4 Economic Profile .................................................................................................. 7 3 THE BIODIVERSITY OF SERBIA .............................................................................. 8 3.1 Overview......................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Ecosystem and Habitat Diversity .................................................................... 8 3.3 Species Diversity ............................................................................................ 9 3.4 Genetic Diversity ............................................................................................. 9 3.5 Protected Areas .............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]