DOCSLIB.ORG

ASPECTS of GEOMETRY for ROCKET PROPULSION Part 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ASPECTS of GEOMETRY for ROCKET PROPULSION Part 1 ASPECTS OF GEOMETRY FOR ROCKET PROPULSION ERNEST YEUNG Abstract. I point out aspects of differential geometry related to rocket propulsion. The dynamics of rocket flight is viewed from the point of view of smooth manifolds. General expressions that hold true for the dynamics of rockets in curved spacetime (relativistic or Newtonian) are formulated. Thermo- dynamics is also formulated from the point of view of a manifold of thermodynamics states. This note serves as an appetizer for further work, to motivate applications of topology, symplectic geometry, and numerical relativity to rocket propulsion and related aspects of rocket flight in space. Part 1. Executive Summary 2 1. Forces 2 2. Energy 3 Part 2. Perspectives and Prospects 3 3. Why? 3 4. Applications 4 Part 3. Some Fluid mechanics 5 5. Mass transport (in Continuum)5 6. Momentum (in Continuum)7 7. Cauchy Stress Tensor9 8. Some Carath´eodory's Thermodynamics 10 9. Energy Transport 12 References 13 Contents \Why does TARS have to detach?" \We have to shed the weight to escape the gravity." Date: 27 mars 2015. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. Fluid Mechanics. Key words and phrases. Aerodynamics, Combustion Theory, Differential Geometry, Folations, Propulsion, Rocket Propulsion, Smooth Manifolds, Symplectic Geometry, Thermodynamics, Topology. Ernest Yeung had been supported by Mr. and Mrs. C.W. Yeung, Prof. Robert A. Rosenstone, Michael Drown, Arvid Kingl, Mr. and Mrs. Valerie Cheng, and the Foundation for Polish Sciences, Warsaw University, during his Masters studies. I am on linkedin: ernestyalumni. I am crowdfunding on Tilt/Open and at Patreon to support basic sciences research: ernestyalumni.tilt.com and ernestyalumni at Patreon. Tilt/Open is an open-source crowdfunding platform that is unique in that it offers open-source tools for building a crowd- funding campaign. Tilt/Open has been used by Microsoft and Dicks Sporting Goods to crowdfund their respective charity causes. Patreon is a subscription crowdfunding service that allows you to directly support the works of artists (and scientists and educators! See the Science and Education section of Patreon), allowing you to be a patron of the arts (and the sciences!). Patreon is run by creators and artists and allows you to be flexible in your support. 1 \Newton's third law: the only way humans have figured out of getting somewhere is to leave something behind." -Interstellar (2014) Part 1. Executive Summary 1. Forces Let spacetime be a quadruple (M; O; A; g) consisting of a (1 + n)-dimensional smooth manifold M, a choice of topology O, a choice of a smooth atlas A, and a choice of metric g, so that the Newtonian and relativistic cases come into play with the choice of g. Usually n = 3 for 3 spatial directions. Consider a total system consisting of a (rigid) rocket with combustion chamber and nozzle, and fuel that will be treated as a fluid. As the rocket is a rigid body, it can be shown that the total momentum of the rocket is such that the rocket acts as if the momentum is at the center of mass and concentrated there like a point particle [1]. Let the mass of the rocket be M0. Let the 4-acceleration of the rocket be a. I claim that the full expression for the external forces and dynamics accounted for in rocket propulsion, written in a covariant manner, of a total system consisting of the rocket, with its (rigid) combustion chamber and nozzle, and fuel, on a spacetime that is a 4-manifold M equipped with a metric g, is the following: (1.1) Z @ui Z @ui Z @e n i _ j n i n i M0a + ρ vol ⊗ ei + u dm ⊗ ei + ρu j vol ⊗ ei + ρu vol ⊗ + [u; ei] = B @t B @x B @t X Z = Fext = ∗σ + Fgrav @(R+B) where B is a smooth, compact submanifold of the spatial foliation N of spacetime M, with boundary @B, enclosing the fuel, ρ is the density of the fuel ρ 2 C1(M), u 2 X(M) is a velocity vector field for the fuel, with its spatial coordinate components denoted as u, voln 2 Ωn(N) is the spatial volume form on N, feig is a (coordinate) frame on M, t 2 R is time, Fext is an external force on the total system, R is a smooth, compact submanifold of the spatial foliation N with boundary @R that encloses the rocket, ∗ ∗ σ 2 Γ(T M ⊗ T M) is the Cauchy-stress tensor on M, and Fgrav is the force due to gravity. The fluid dynamics of the fuel motivates the form of its dynamics on the left-hand side (LHS) of (1.1) (cf. (6.7)). dm_ 2 Ωn(N) is a n-form on N describing the mass transport of an infinitesimal piece of the fuel (cf. (6.6)), which I'll recap as well here: @ρ _ n n n dm = vol + diuρvol = L @ +uρvol @t @t R i _ R _ In (1.1), if one subtracts from both sides the term B u dm ⊗ ei ≡ B dm ⊗ u, then the so-called thrust, due to the ejection of fluid out of the rocket R, pushing on the rocket (Newton's third law!), force is obtained as a contribution to the acceleration of the rocket a: Z − dm_ ⊗ u B 2 R j @ui n The term B ρu @xj vol ⊗ei in (1.1) also informs us that the geometry of the nozzle can push the rocket forward. One should also note that the expression for the time derivative of the momentum of the fluid Π_ at its boundary can also be useful in evaluating rocket performance (cf. (6.7)): Z i Z Z Z @u n @ρ n i n i n @ei Π_ = ρvol ⊗ ei + vol ⊗ u + ρu iuvol ⊗ ei + ρu vol ⊗ + [u; ei] B @t B @t @B B @t and in particular this term: Z Z @ρ n i n vol ⊗ u + ρu iuvol ⊗ ei B @t @B where the geometry of the surface from which the fluid exits from comes into play in the quantity n iuvol . In (1.1), on the RHS, I claim that the term Z ∗σ @(R+B) which is the Hodge star operator applied to the (0; 2)-type symmetric tensor σ, representing the Cauchy stress tensor, is a general, manifestly covariant, expression for the sum of all the forces on a system due to stress and strain at the system's boundary. What one then does is plug into σ a particular form of the stress tensor. In this note, I apply one example, the perfect fluid with fluid pressure (cf.(7.2)). 2. Energy Assuming a steady state flow, from calculating the time derivative of the total energy E of a fluid inside a smooth, compact body B with boundary, there is a term that describes the change in energy due to fluid leaving the boundary surface (cf. (9.5)) Z Z 1 2 p n 1 2 p n (2.1) d( u + w − )iuvol = ( u + w − )iuvol B 2 ρ @B 2 ρ where Stoke's law was used and where ρ is the mass density and p the pressure. It should be noted that no conditions on the thermodynamic process was made as the definition of internal energy per molar mass w was solely employed to express the time change in energy. Part 2. Perspectives and Prospects 3. Why? I became interested in rocket propulsion for two reasons: Elon Musk's rationale for advancing humanity to become a truly spacefaring civilization so to make (intelligent) life multi-planetary 1 and I wanted enable the observation and creation of physical phenomenon - black holes, worm holes, anti-deSitter (AdS) space - seen in (the best movie ever made) Interstellar (Nolan, 2014) possible. Apparently, Musk began, after the successful IPO (initial public offering) of PayPal, to have any expertise on rocket propulsion by reading books and talking with experts 2. Reading books was something I could immediately do after my completion of my Master's thesis in Physics (2014). Books on rocket propulsion he read included Rocket Propulsion Elements by Sutton and Biblarz [2] and Aerothermodynamics of Gas Turbine and Rocket Propulsion by Oates [3]. 1A Conversation with Elon Musk https://youtu.be/vDwzmJpI4io 2Richard Feloni \Former SpaceX Exec Explains How Elon Musk Taught Himself Rocket Science", Business Insider, http://www.businessinsider.com/how-elon-musk-learned-rocket-science-for-spacex-2014-10 3 Also, I did not find any MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) for graduate-level rocket propulsion, but I did find one MIT OCW (Open CourseWare) for 16.512 Rocket Propulsion, taught by Prof. Martinez- Sanchez in the Fall 2005 [4],a course suggested by Loretta Trevi~noon quora.com 3, which also, in turn, led me to this suggested reading [5]. One small endeavor I would like to help in is open, online education at a high-level, the graduate or professional level, for aerodynamics and propulsion because I want to encourage physicists, particularly theoretical physicists, to interface and help with engineering problems and bring their unique expertise to be applied there. I would point to Dr. Feynman's role in investigating the Challenger disaster (1986) as an example of how theoretical physicists can help engineers in aerospace 4. So one very small part that I do is to write (a lot of) notes on my readings of these engineering texts and catalogue resources I find online, sharing this educational path for (hopefully) others with a physics or pure math background to try the same. 4. Applications I'll allow myself, here, to speculate on some possible applications from math and physics to rocket propulsion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Some Basic Rules of Tensor Calculus
    A Some Basic Rules of Tensor Calculus The tensor calculus is a powerful tool for the description of the fundamentals in con- tinuum mechanics and the derivation of the governing equations for applied prob- lems. In general, there are two possibilities for the representation of the tensors and the tensorial equations: – the direct (symbolic) notation and – the index (component) notation The direct notation operates with scalars, vectors and tensors as physical objects defined in the three dimensional space. A vector (first rank tensor) a is considered as a directed line segment rather than a triple of numbers (coordinates). A second rank tensor A is any finite sum of ordered vector pairs A = a b + ... +c d. The scalars, vectors and tensors are handled as invariant (independent⊗ from the choice⊗ of the coordinate system) objects. This is the reason for the use of the direct notation in the modern literature of mechanics and rheology, e.g. [29, 32, 49, 123, 131, 199, 246, 313, 334] among others. The index notation deals with components or coordinates of vectors and tensors. For a selected basis, e.g. gi, i = 1, 2, 3 one can write a = aig , A = aibj + ... + cidj g g i i ⊗ j Here the Einstein’s summation convention is used: in one expression the twice re- peated indices are summed up from 1 to 3, e.g. 3 3 k k ik ik a gk ∑ a gk, A bk ∑ A bk ≡ k=1 ≡ k=1 In the above examples k is a so-called dummy index. Within the index notation the basic operations with tensors are defined with respect to their coordinates, e.
    [Show full text]
  • Cauchy Tetrahedron Argument and the Proofs of the Existence of Stress Tensor, a Comprehensive Review, Challenges, and Improvements
    CAUCHY TETRAHEDRON ARGUMENT AND THE PROOFS OF THE EXISTENCE OF STRESS TENSOR, A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW, CHALLENGES, AND IMPROVEMENTS EHSAN AZADI1 Abstract. In 1822, Cauchy presented the idea of traction vector that contains both the normal and tangential components of the internal surface forces per unit area and gave the tetrahedron argument to prove the existence of stress tensor. These great achievements form the main part of the foundation of continuum mechanics. For about two centuries, some versions of tetrahedron argument and a few other proofs of the existence of stress tensor are presented in every text on continuum mechanics, fluid mechanics, and the relevant subjects. In this article, we show the birth, importance, and location of these Cauchy's achievements, then by presenting the formal tetrahedron argument in detail, for the first time, we extract some fundamental challenges. These conceptual challenges are related to the result of applying the conservation of linear momentum to any mass element, the order of magnitude of the surface and volume terms, the definition of traction vectors on the surfaces that pass through the same point, the approximate processes in the derivation of stress tensor, and some others. In a comprehensive review, we present the different tetrahedron arguments and the proofs of the existence of stress tensor, discuss the challenges in each one, and classify them in two general approaches. In the first approach that is followed in most texts, the traction vectors do not exactly define on the surfaces that pass through the same point, so most of the challenges hold. But in the second approach, the traction vectors are defined on the surfaces that pass exactly through the same point, therefore some of the relevant challenges are removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress Components Cauchy Stress Tensor
    Mechanics and Design Chapter 2. Stresses and Strains Byeng D. Youn System Health & Risk Management Laboratory Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering Seoul National University Seoul National University CONTENTS 1 Traction or Stress Vector 2 Coordinate Transformation of Stress Tensors 3 Principal Axis 4 Example 2019/1/4 Seoul National University - 2 - Chapter 2 : Stresses and Strains Traction or Stress Vector; Stress Components Traction Vector Consider a surface element, ∆ S , of either the bounding surface of the body or the fictitious internal surface of the body as shown in Fig. 2.1. Assume that ∆ S contains the point. The traction vector, t, is defined by Δf t = lim (2-1) ∆→S0∆S Fig. 2.1 Definition of surface traction 2019/1/4 Seoul National University - 3 - Chapter 2 : Stresses and Strains Traction or Stress Vector; Stress Components Traction Vector (Continued) It is assumed that Δ f and ∆ S approach zero but the fraction, in general, approaches a finite limit. An even stronger hypothesis is made about the limit approached at Q by the surface force per unit area. First, consider several different surfaces passing through Q all having the same normal n at Q as shown in Fig. 2.2. Fig. 2.2 Traction vector t and vectors at Q Then the tractions on S , S ′ and S ′′ are the same. That is, the traction is independent of the surface chosen so long as they all have the same normal. 2019/1/4 Seoul National University - 4 - Chapter 2 : Stresses and Strains Traction or Stress Vector; Stress Components Stress vectors on three coordinate plane Let the traction vectors on planes perpendicular to the coordinate axes be t(1), t(2), and t(3) as shown in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Geometric Character of Stress in Continuum Mechanics
    Z. angew. Math. Phys. 58 (2007) 1–14 0044-2275/07/050001-14 DOI 10.1007/s00033-007-6141-8 Zeitschrift f¨ur angewandte c 2007 Birkh¨auser Verlag, Basel Mathematik und Physik ZAMP On the geometric character of stress in continuum mechanics Eva Kanso, Marino Arroyo, Yiying Tong, Arash Yavari, Jerrold E. Marsden1 and Mathieu Desbrun Abstract. This paper shows that the stress field in the classical theory of continuum mechanics may be taken to be a covector-valued differential two-form. The balance laws and other funda- mental laws of continuum mechanics may be neatly rewritten in terms of this geometric stress. A geometrically attractive and covariant derivation of the balance laws from the principle of energy balance in terms of this stress is presented. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). Keywords. Continuum mechanics, elasticity, stress tensor, differential forms. 1. Motivation This paper proposes a reformulation of classical continuum mechanics in terms of bundle-valued exterior forms. Our motivation is to provide a geometric description of force in continuum mechanics, which leads to an elegant geometric theory and, at the same time, may enable the development of space-time integration algorithms that respect the underlying geometric structure at the discrete level. In classical mechanics the traditional approach is to define all the kinematic and kinetic quantities using vector and tensor fields. For example, velocity and traction are both viewed as vector fields and power is defined as their inner product, which is induced from an appropriately defined Riemannian metric. On the other hand, it has long been appreciated in geometric mechanics that force should not be viewed as a vector, but rather a one-form.
    [Show full text]
  • Stress and Strain
    Stress and strain Stress Lecture 2 – Loads, traction, stress Mechanical Engineering Design - N.Bonora 2018 Stress and strain Introduction • One important step in mechanical design is the determination of the internal stresses, once the external load are assigned, and to assess that they do not exceed material allowables. • Internal stress - that differ from surface or contact stresses that are generated where the load are applied - are those associated with the internal forces that are created by external loads for a body in equilibrium. • The same concept holds for complex geometry and loads. To evaluate these stresses is not a a slender block of material; (a) under the action of external straightforward matter, suffice to say here that forces F, (b) internal normal stress σ, (c) internal normal and they will invariably be non-uniform over a shear stress surface, that is, the stress at some particle will differ from the stress at a neighbouring particle Mechanical Engineering Design - N.Bonora 2018 Stress and strain Tractions and the Physical Meaning of Internal Stress • All materials have a complex molecular microstructure and each molecule exerts a force on each of its neighbors. The complex interaction of countless molecular forces maintains a body in equilibrium in its unstressed state. • When the body is disturbed and deformed into a new equilibrium position, net forces act. An imaginary plane can be drawn through the material • The force exerted by the molecules above the plane on the material below the plane and can be attractive or repulsive. Different planes can be taken through the same portion of material and, in general, a different force will act on the plane.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Review of Stress, Linear Strain and Elastic Stress- Strain Relations
    2 Review of Stress, Linear Strain and Elastic Stress- Strain Relations 2.1 Introduction In metal forming and machining processes, the work piece is subjected to external forces in order to achieve a certain desired shape. Under the action of these forces, the work piece undergoes displacements and deformation and develops internal forces. A measure of deformation is defined as strain. The intensity of internal forces is called as stress. The displacements, strains and stresses in a deformable body are interlinked. Additionally, they all depend on the geometry and material of the work piece, external forces and supports. Therefore, to estimate the external forces required for achieving the desired shape, one needs to determine the displacements, strains and stresses in the work piece. This involves solving the following set of governing equations : (i) strain-displacement relations, (ii) stress- strain relations and (iii) equations of motion. In this chapter, we develop the governing equations for the case of small deformation of linearly elastic materials. While developing these equations, we disregard the molecular structure of the material and assume the body to be a continuum. This enables us to define the displacements, strains and stresses at every point of the body. We begin our discussion on governing equations with the concept of stress at a point. Then, we carry out the analysis of stress at a point to develop the ideas of stress invariants, principal stresses, maximum shear stress, octahedral stresses and the hydrostatic and deviatoric parts of stress. These ideas will be used in the next chapter to develop the theory of plasticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Math45061: Solution Sheet1 Iii
    1 MATH45061: SOLUTION SHEET1 III 1.) Balance of angular momentum about a particular point Z requires that (R Z) ρV˙ d = LZ . ZΩ − × V The moment about the point Z can be decomposed into torque due to the body force, F , and surface traction T : LZ = (R Z) ρF d + (R Z) T d ; ZΩ − × V Z∂Ω − × S and so (R Z) ρV˙ d = (R Z) ρF d + (R Z) T d . (1) ZΩ − × V ZΩ − × V Z∂Ω − × S If linear momentum is in balance then ρV˙ d = ρF d + T d ; ZΩ V ZΩ V Z∂Ω S and taking the cross product with the constant vector Z Y , which can be brought inside the integral, − (Z Y ) ρV˙ d = (Z Y ) ρF d + (Z Y ) T d . (2) ZΩ − × V ZΩ − × V Z∂Ω − × S Adding equation (2) to equation (1) and simplifying (R Y ) ρV˙ d = (R Y ) ρF d + (R Y ) T d . ZΩ − × V ZΩ − × V Z∂Ω − × S Thus, the angular momentum about any point Y is in balance. If body couples, L, are present then they need to be included in the angular mo- mentum balance as an additional term on the right-hand side L d . ZΩ V This term will be unaffected by the argument above, so we need to demonstrate that the body couple distribution is independent of the axis about which the angular momentum balance is taken. For a body couple to be independent of the body force, the forces that constitute the couple must be in balance because otherwise an additional contribution to the body force would result.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of the Strong Prolongation Equation For
    Study of the strong prolongation equation for the construction of statically admissible stress fields: implementation and optimization Valentine Rey, Pierre Gosselet, Christian Rey To cite this version: Valentine Rey, Pierre Gosselet, Christian Rey. Study of the strong prolongation equation for the con- struction of statically admissible stress fields: implementation and optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Elsevier, 2014, 268, pp.82-104. 10.1016/j.cma.2013.08.021. hal-00862622 HAL Id: hal-00862622 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00862622 Submitted on 17 Sep 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Study of the strong prolongation equation for the construction of statically admissible stress fields: implementation and optimization Valentine Rey, Pierre Gosselet, Christian Rey∗ LMT-Cachan / ENS-Cachan, CNRS, UPMC, Pres UniverSud Paris 61, avenue du président Wilson, 94235 Cachan, France September 18, 2013 Abstract This paper focuses on the construction of statically admissible stress fields (SA-fields) for a posteriori error estimation. In the context of verification, the recovery of such fields enables to provide strict upper bounds of the energy norm of the discretization error between the known finite element solution and the unavailable exact solution.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Operations of Tensor Algebra
    A Basic Operations of Tensor Algebra The tensor calculus is a powerful tool for the description of the fundamentals in con- tinuum mechanics and the derivation of the governing equations for applied prob- lems. In general, there are two possibilities for the representation of the tensors and the tensorial equations: – the direct (symbolic, coordinate-free) notation and – the index (component) notation The direct notation operates with scalars, vectors and tensors as physical objects defined in the three-dimensional space (in this book we are limit ourselves to this case). A vector (first rank tensor) a is considered as a directed line segment rather than a triple of numbers (coordinates). A second rank tensor A is any finite sum of ordered vector pairs A = a ⊗ b + ...+ c ⊗ d. The scalars, vectors and tensors are handled as invariant (independent from the choice of the coordinate system) quantities. This is the reason for the use of the direct notation in the modern literature of mechanics and rheology, e.g. [32, 36, 53, 126, 134, 205, 253, 321, 343] among others. The basics of the direct tensor calculus are given in the classical textbooks of Wilson (founded upon the lecture notes of Gibbs) [331] and Lagally [183]. The index notation deals with components or coordinates of vectors and tensors. For a selected basis, e.g. gi, i = 1, 2, 3 one can write i i j i j ⊗ a = a gi, A = a b + ...+ c d gi gj Here the Einstein’s summation convention is used: in one expression the twice re- peated indices are summed up from 1 to 3, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Methods in Mathematical Physics I: Multi-Linear Algebra, Tensors, Spinors and Special Relativity
    Geometric Methods in Mathematical Physics I: Multi-Linear Algebra, Tensors, Spinors and Special Relativity by Valter Moretti www.science.unitn.it/∼moretti/home.html Department of Mathematics, University of Trento Italy Lecture notes authored by Valter Moretti and freely downloadable from the web page http://www.science.unitn.it/∼moretti/dispense.html and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribuzione-Non commerciale-Non opere derivate 2.5 Italia License. None is authorized to sell them 1 Contents 1 Introduction and some useful notions and results 5 2 Multi-linear Mappings and Tensors 8 2.1 Dual space and conjugate space, pairing, adjoint operator . 8 2.2 Multi linearity: tensor product, tensors, universality theorem . 14 2.2.1 Tensors as multi linear maps . 14 2.2.2 Universality theorem and its applications . 22 2.2.3 Abstract definition of the tensor product of vector spaces . 26 2.2.4 Hilbert tensor product of Hilbert spaces . 28 3 Tensor algebra, abstract index notation and some applications 34 3.1 Tensor algebra generated by a vector space . 34 3.2 The abstract index notation and rules to handle tensors . 37 3.2.1 Canonical bases and abstract index notation . 37 3.2.2 Rules to compose, decompose, produce tensors form tensors . 39 3.2.3 Linear transformations of tensors are tensors too . 41 3.3 Physical invariance of the form of laws and tensors . 43 3.4 Tensors on Affine and Euclidean spaces . 43 3.4.1 Tensor spaces, Cartesian tensors . 45 3.4.2 Applied tensors . 46 3.4.3 The natural isomorphism between V and V ∗ for Cartesian vectors in Eu- clidean spaces .
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Stress and the Balance Principles
    3 Stress and the Balance Principles Three basic laws of physics are discussed in this Chapter: (1) The Law of Conservation of Mass (2) The Balance of Linear Momentum (3) The Balance of Angular Momentum together with the conservation of mechanical energy and the principle of virtual work, which are different versions of (2). (2) and (3) involve the concept of stress, which allows one to describe the action of forces in materials. 315 316 Section 3.1 3.1 Conservation of Mass 3.1.1 Mass and Density Mass is a non-negative scalar measure of a body’s tendency to resist a change in motion. Consider a small volume element Δv whose mass is Δm . Define the average density of this volume element by the ratio Δm ρ = (3.1.1) AVE Δv If p is some point within the volume element, then define the spatial mass density at p to be the limiting value of this ratio as the volume shrinks down to the point, Δm ρ(x,t) = lim Spatial Density (3.1.2) Δv→0 Δv In a real material, the incremental volume element Δv must not actually get too small since then the limit ρ would depend on the atomistic structure of the material; the volume is only allowed to decrease to some minimum value which contains a large number of molecules. The spatial mass density is a representative average obtained by having Δv large compared to the atomic scale, but small compared to a typical length scale of the problem under consideration. The density, as with displacement, velocity, and other quantities, is defined for specific particles of a continuum, and is a continuous function of coordinates and time, ρ = ρ(x,t) .
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Complexes in Continuum Mechanics
    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Arzhang Angoshtari · Arash Yavari Differential Complexes in Continuum Mechanics Abstract We study some differential complexes in continuum mechanics that involve both symmetric and non-symmetric second-order tensors. In particular, we show that the tensorial analogue of the standard grad-curl- div complex can simultaneously describe the kinematics and the kinetics of motions of a continuum. The relation between this complex and the de Rham complex allows one to readily derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for the compatibility of the displacement gradient and the existence of stress functions on non-contractible bodies. We also derive the local compatibility equations in terms of the Green deformation tensor for motions of 2D and 3D bodies, and shells in curved ambient spaces with constant curvatures. Contents 1 Introduction...................................2 2 Differential Complexes for Second-Order Tensors..............6 2.1 Complexes Induced by the de Rham Complex.............6 2.1.1 Complexes for 3-manifolds....................6 2.1.2 Complexes for 2-manifolds.................... 10 2.2 Complexes Induced by the Calabi Complex.............. 12 2.2.1 The Linear Elasticity Complex for 3-manifolds........ 16 Arzhang Angoshtari School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Arash Yavari School of Civil and Environmental Engineering & The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. Tel.: +1-404-8942436 Fax: +1-404-8942278 E-mail: [email protected] 2 Arzhang Angoshtari, Arash Yavari 2.2.2 The Linear Elasticity Complex for 2-manifolds.......
    [Show full text]