Gaia Early DR3 Systemic Motions of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies and Orbital Properties with a Massive Large Magellanic Cloud

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gaia Early DR3 Systemic Motions of Local Group Dwarf Galaxies and Orbital Properties with a Massive Large Magellanic Cloud Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. eGDR3_ppm_arxiv ©ESO 2021 June 17, 2021 Gaia early DR3 systemic motions of Local Group dwarf galaxies and orbital properties with a massive Large Magellanic Cloud. G. Battaglia1; 2,e-mail: [email protected], S. Taibi1; 2, G. F. Thomas1; 2, and T. K. Fritz1; 2 1 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Calle Vía Láctea s/n, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain 2 Universidad de La Laguna, Avda. Astrofísico Fco. Sánchez, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain Received: ; accepted: ABSTRACT Aims. We perform a comprehensive determination of the systemic proper motions of 74 dwarf galaxies and dwarf galaxy candidates in the Local Group based on Gaia early data release 3. The outputs of the analysis for each galaxy, including probabilities of membership, will be made publicly available. The analysis is augmented by a determination of the orbital properties of galaxies within 500 kpc. Methods. We adopt the flexible Bayesian methodology presented by McConnachie & Venn (2020), which takes into account the location of the stars on the sky, on the colour-magnitude diagram and on the proper motion plane. We apply some modifications, in particular to the way the colour-magnitude diagram and spectroscopic information are factored in, e.g. by including stars in several evolution phases. The bulk motions are integrated in three gravitational potentials: two where the Milky Way is treated in isolation 12 and has a mass 0.9 & 1.6 ×10 M and the time-varying potential by Vasiliev et al. (2021), which includes the infall of a massive Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Results. We are able to determine bulk proper motions for 73 systems, and we consider reliable 66 of these measurements. For the first time, systemic motions are presented for galaxies out to a distance of 1.4 Mpc, in the NGC 3109 association. The inclusion of the infall of a massive LMC significantly modifies the orbital trajectories of the objects, with respect to orbit integration in static Milky Way-only potentials, and leads to 6 galaxies being likely associated to the LMC, 3 possibly associated and 1 recently captured object. We discuss the results of the orbit integration in the context of the relation of the galaxies to the system of Milky Way satellites, implications for the too-big-to-fail problem, impact on star formation histories, and tidal disruption. Key words. Methods: statistical – Astrometry – Galaxies: dwarf – Galaxies: evolution – Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics – Local Group 1. Introduction (e.g. Mayer et al. 2006; Muñoz et al. 2008; Kazantzidis et al. 2011; Battaglia et al. 2015; Hausammann et al. 2019; Iorio et al. Knowledge of the bulk motions of galaxies residing in the Local 2019; Miyoshi & Chiba 2020; Ruiz-Lara et al. 2021; Rusakov Group (LG) is a precious resource for a wealth of galaxy evolu- et al. 2021; Di Cintio et al. 2021; Genina et al. 2020, and refer- tion and near-field cosmology investigations, e.g. inferences of ences therein). the mass, barycenter position and velocity of the LG (e.g. Kahn & Woltjer 1959; Peebles et al. 2001; Li & White 2008; van der Before the second data release of the Gaia mission (GDR2) Marel et al. 2012b; González et al. 2014; Peñarrubia et al. 2014, (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2016, 2018a), measurements of the to mention a few), studies of the possible history of past interac- systemic proper motions (PMs) of galaxies in the LG were es- tions between the Milky Way (MW) and the M31 system and its sentially limited to the Magellanic Clouds, the so-called classical future fate (e.g. Loeb et al. 2005; van der Marel et al. 2012a; Sa- MW dwarf spheroidal galaxies (dSphs), one "ultra faint dwarf" lomon et al. 2020, and references therein); determinations of the (UFD), M31, M33 and IC 10, mostly from HST observations mass of the MW through dynamical modelling of tracers of its and a few VLBI observations of OH masers (see references in gravitational potential, such as its satellite galaxies (e.g. Wilkin- Sect.6); some of them having become available surprisingly re- son & Evans 1999; Battaglia et al. 2005; Boylan-Kolchin et al. cently (e.g. in the case of the Sextans MW dSph the first such arXiv:2106.08819v1 [astro-ph.GA] 16 Jun 2021 2013; Patel et al. 2018; Callingham et al. 2019; Fritz et al. 2020, measurement was published only in 2018 by Casetti-Dinescu see references in Fritz et al. 2020 for an overview on the works et al. 2018). on this topic); group infall as well as the significance and stabil- Since April 2018, the situation has seen a dramatic improve- ity of the Vast Polar Structure (e.g. Metz et al. 2008; Pawlowski ment, starting with the Gaia science verification article (Gaia & Kroupa 2013; Fritz et al. 2018; Kallivayalil et al. 2018; Li Collaboration et al. 2018b). Multiple determinations of the sys- et al. 2021a); considerations on the missing satellite problem temic PM of a large number of MW satellite galaxies and galaxy (e.g. Simon 2018; Fritz et al. 2018). The orbital history of MW candidates blossomed in a matter of weeks after GDR2, led by satellite galaxies is also very likely to influence several aspects several groups in the community, and using a variety of tech- of their evolution, through e.g. the impact of ram-pressure strip- niques, e.g. focusing only on stars with prior spectroscopic in- ping and tidal effects onto their gas content, star formation his- formation (Simon 2018; Fritz et al. 2018) or including the full tory (SFH), morphology and dark matter (DM) halo properties set of stars with astrometric information (Kallivayalil et al. 2018; Article number, page 1 of 47 A&A proofs: manuscript no. eGDR3_ppm_arxiv Massari & Helmi 2018). It is now becoming routine to use Gaia galaxies and its distribution on the colour-magnitude plane ac- astrometric data also to remove contaminants, as well as to at- counting also for the photometric completeness of eGDR3 data; tempt systemic proper motions determinations along with the this allows us also to determine probability of memberships for study of other properties of the systems (e.g. Longeard et al. stars in different evolutionary phases, which we will make avail- 2018; Torrealba et al. 2019). Surveys of the MW stellar halo and able to the community 2, together with several other outputs of sub-structures within are and will make plentiful use of Gaia as- our analysis. trometry to boost the success rate in target selection (e.g. Conroy Finally, we study the orbital properties of the galaxies sur- et al. 2019; Li et al. 2019; Allende Prieto et al. 2020, but also the roundings of the MW by integrating their bulk motions in a set 12 surveys to be carried out with 4MOST and WEAVE, to mention of gravitational potentials, bracketing a 0.9-1.6×10 M range some of the upcoming ones). for the mass of the MW. Motivated by the work by Patel et al. The methodologies applied in the early GDR2 works men- (2020), who showed that the orbits of MW satellites can differ tioned above were rather simple ones, being based on iterative significantly between a gravitational potential including only the cleanings of the data-sets via σ-clipping and no statistical treat- MW and one where the gravitational influence of the LMC (and ment of the foreground/background contamination. Later on, SMC) are taken into account (and all galaxies are free to move in more sophisticated methods were used, e.g. with simultaneous response), we integrate the bulk motions also in the triaxial time- statistical modelling of the properties of the dwarf galaxy and the varying MW potential made available by Vasiliev et al.(2021), contamination. For instance, Pace & Li(2019) used the spatial where the infall of a massive LMC and the response of the MW and PM information of stars preselected to have magnitude and to this infall are modelled. In this context, we also revisit the color lying on an isochrone and adopted a multi-variate Gaussian association of dwarfs surrounding the MW to the LMC system. in proper motion for both the dwarf galaxy and the MW, while In Sect.2 we introduce the sample of galaxies analysed and McConnachie & Venn(2020a) used all the observables at once in Sect.3 the data-sets used and the quality selection criteria ap- and adopted the empirical distribution of the contaminant stars plied. In Sect.4 we present the methodology for the systemic in the PM and the colour-magnitude (CM) planes. proper motion determinations, and discuss the output and the Interestingly, the use of GDR2 data has been also pushed tests performed to tackle the robustness of the method; in Sect.5 beyond the MW system, with determinations of the tangential we complement the results with a determination of the zero- motions of M31 & M33 (van der Marel et al. 2019), as well as points and additional errors due to systematics in the Gaia eDR3 of a few LG dwarf galaxies such as NGC 6822, IC 1613, WLM data, using QSO. Our systemic proper motions are compared to and Leo A (McConnachie et al. 2021). those in the literature in Sect.6. In Sect.7 the bulk motions are The early third data release of Gaia data, hereafter eGDR3, integrated in the three gravitational potentials and the resulting (Gaia Collaboration et al. 2021a) has implied more precise and orbital trajectories and parameters are then used to address the accurate astrometric measurements; in particular, for PMs the impact of the LMC on the reconstructed orbital history, make precision has increased of a factor of two and systematic er- considerations on the too-big-to-fail problem, on the system of rors decreased by a factor ∼2.5 (Lindegren et al.
Recommended publications
  • Wyn Evans Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
    DARK MATTER SUBSTRUCTURES IN THE NEARBY UNIVERSE Wyn Evans Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge Monday, 16 July 2012 DARK MATTER 1. The dwarf spheroidals 2. The ultra-faints 3. The clouds & streams 4. The unknown Monday, 16 July 2012 DWARF SPHEROIDALS Image (35’ by 35’) of the Sculptor dwarf spheroidal taken with the NOAO CTIO 4 m telescope. Monday, 16 July 2012 DWARF SPHEROIDALS Surrounding the Milky Way are 9 classical dwarf spheroidal galaxies (Scu, For, Leo I, Leo II, UMi, Dra, Car, Sex, Sgr). These contain intermediate age to old stellar populations and no gas. They have velocity dispersions ∼ 8-10 km/s, half-light radius ∼ 200-300 pc, and absolute magnitudes MV brighter than -8. They are all highly dark matter dominated, and are natural targets for indirect detection experiments. What are their dark matter profiles? Are they cusped or cored? Monday, 16 July 2012 DWARF SPHEROIDALS Radial velocity surveys with multi-object spectrographs have now provided datasets of thousands of velocities for the giants stars. Early hopes that the photometry and line of sight velocity dispersion profile could be used to constrain the dark halo give way to pessimism. Most early modelers used the spherical Jeans equations to deduce dark matter properties at the center. Monday, 16 July 2012 JEANS EQUATIONS • The spherical Jeans equation is dangerous! If the light profile is cored (Plummer), then assuming isotropy gives a cored dark matter density. If the light profile is cusped (exponential), then so is the dark halo (An & Evans 2009). • The degeneracies in the Jeans equations are also illustrated by Walker et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects
    Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Porto Alegre 2017 Juliana Crestani Ribeiro de Souza Spatial Distribution of Galactic Globular Clusters: Distance Uncertainties and Dynamical Effects Dissertação elaborada sob orientação do Prof. Dr. Eduardo Luis Damiani Bica, co- orientação do Prof. Dr. Charles José Bon- ato e apresentada ao Instituto de Física da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul em preenchimento do requisito par- cial para obtenção do título de Mestre em Física. Porto Alegre 2017 Acknowledgements To my parents, who supported me and made this possible, in a time and place where being in a university was just a distant dream. To my dearest friends Elisabeth, Robert, Augusto, and Natália - who so many times helped me go from "I give up" to "I’ll try once more". To my cats Kira, Fen, and Demi - who lazily join me in bed at the end of the day, and make everything worthwhile. "But, first of all, it will be necessary to explain what is our idea of a cluster of stars, and by what means we have obtained it. For an instance, I shall take the phenomenon which presents itself in many clusters: It is that of a number of lucid spots, of equal lustre, scattered over a circular space, in such a manner as to appear gradually more compressed towards the middle; and which compression, in the clusters to which I allude, is generally carried so far, as, by imperceptible degrees, to end in a luminous center, of a resolvable blaze of light." William Herschel, 1789 Abstract We provide a sample of 170 Galactic Globular Clusters (GCs) and analyse its spatial distribution properties.
    [Show full text]
  • Galactic Archaeology. the Dwarfs That Survived and Perished
    Galactic Archaeology. The dwarfs that survived and perished Vasily Belokurova,∗ aInstitute of Astronomy, Cambridge Abstract From the archaeological point of view, the local dwarf galaxies are unique objects in which the imprint of the conditions that shaped the early structure formation can be studied today at high resolution. Over the last decade, this new window into the high redshift Universe has started to be exploited using deep wide-field imaging, high resolution spectroscopy and cutting edge N- body and hydro-dynamical simulations. We review the recent advances in the observational studies of the Milky Way dwarf galaxies, with the aim to understand the properties of the population as a whole and to assist an objective comparison between the models and the data. Keywords: Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics, Galaxies: dwarf, dark matter, Local Group, Galaxies: stellar content. 1. Introduction The prehistoric stars whose formation epochs lie beyond the redshift ac- cessible by the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, have been found en masse in little satellites around the Milky Way. Other less fortunate dwarf galaxies have been pulled apart by gravity to furnish the diffuse Galactic halo. These re- cently uncovered relics of the ancient dwarf galaxy population may play a arXiv:1307.0041v2 [astro-ph.GA] 15 Jul 2013 vital role in the pursuit of reconstructing the formation of the Galaxy. Its path from the distant pre-reionisation era, through the most active growth ∗Corresponding author Email address: [email protected] (Vasily Belokurov) Preprint submitted to New Astronomy Reviews July 16, 2013 periods to the present day, can be gleaned by studying the chemical compo- sition and the phase-space density distribution of these halo denizens.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is an Ultra-Faint Galaxy?
    What is an ultra-faint Galaxy? UCSB KITP Feb 16 2012 Beth Willman (Haverford College) ~ 1/10 Milky Way luminosity Large Magellanic Cloud, MV = -18 image credit: Yuri Beletsky (ESO) and APOD NGC 205, MV = -16.4 ~ 1/40 Milky Way luminosity image credit: www.noao.edu Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/300 Milky Way luminosity MV = -14.2 Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/2700 Milky Way luminosity MV = -11.9 Image credit: David W. Hogg, Michael R. Blanton, and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Collaboration ~ 1/14,000 Milky Way luminosity MV = -10.1 ~ 1/40,000 Milky Way luminosity ~ 1/1,000,000 Milky Way luminosity Ursa Major 1 Finding Invisible Galaxies bright faint blue red Willman et al 2002, Walsh, Willman & Jerjen 2009; see also e.g. Koposov et al 2008, Belokurov et al. Finding Invisible Galaxies Red, bright, cool bright Blue, hot, bright V-band apparent brightness V-band faint Red, faint, cool blue red From ARAA, V26, 1988 Willman et al 2002, Walsh, Willman & Jerjen 2009; see also e.g. Koposov et al 2008, Belokurov et al. Finding Invisible Galaxies Ursa Major I dwarf 1/1,000,000 MW luminosity Willman et al 2005 ~ 1/1,000,000 Milky Way luminosity Ursa Major 1 CMD of Ursa Major I Okamoto et al 2008 Distribution of the Milky Wayʼs dwarfs -14 Milky Way dwarfs 107 -12 -10 classical dwarfs V -8 5 10 Sun M L -6 ultra-faint dwarfs Canes Venatici II -4 Leo V Pisces II Willman I 1000 -2 Segue I 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for Dark Matter Annihilation in Recently Discovered Milky Way Satellites with Fermi-Lat A
    The Astrophysical Journal, 834:110 (15pp), 2017 January 10 doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/110 © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. SEARCHING FOR DARK MATTER ANNIHILATION IN RECENTLY DISCOVERED MILKY WAY SATELLITES WITH FERMI-LAT A. Albert1, B. Anderson2,3, K. Bechtol4, A. Drlica-Wagner5, M. Meyer2,3, M. Sánchez-Conde2,3, L. Strigari6, M. Wood1, T. M. C. Abbott7, F. B. Abdalla8,9, A. Benoit-Lévy10,8,11, G. M. Bernstein12, R. A. Bernstein13, E. Bertin10,11, D. Brooks8, D. L. Burke14,15, A. Carnero Rosell16,17, M. Carrasco Kind18,19, J. Carretero20,21, M. Crocce20, C. E. Cunha14,C.B.D’Andrea22,23, L. N. da Costa16,17, S. Desai24,25, H. T. Diehl5, J. P. Dietrich24,25, P. Doel8, T. F. Eifler12,26, A. E. Evrard27,28, A. Fausti Neto16, D. A. Finley5, B. Flaugher5, P. Fosalba20, J. Frieman5,29, D. W. Gerdes28, D. A. Goldstein30,31, D. Gruen14,15, R. A. Gruendl18,19, K. Honscheid32,33, D. J. James7, S. Kent5, K. Kuehn34, N. Kuropatkin5, O. Lahav8,T.S.Li6, M. A. G. Maia16,17, M. March12, J. L. Marshall6, P. Martini32,35, C. J. Miller27,28, R. Miquel21,36, E. Neilsen5, B. Nord5, R. Ogando16,17, A. A. Plazas26, K. Reil15, A. K. Romer37, E. S. Rykoff14,15, E. Sanchez38, B. Santiago16,39, M. Schubnell28, I. Sevilla-Noarbe18,38, R. C. Smith7, M. Soares-Santos5, F. Sobreira16, E. Suchyta12, M. E. C. Swanson19, G. Tarle28, V. Vikram40, A. R. Walker7, and R. H. Wechsler14,15,41 (The Fermi-LAT and DES Collaborations) 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA; [email protected], [email protected] 2 Department of Physics, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] 3 The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 4 Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • 14734 (Stsci Edit Number: 18, Created: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 2:19:23 PM EST) - Overview
    Proposal 14734 (STScI Edit Number: 18, Created: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 2:19:23 PM EST) - Overview 14734 - Milky Way Cosmology: Laying the Foundation for Full 6-D Dynamical Mapping of the Nearby Universe Cycle: 24, Proposal Category: GO (Treasury, JWST Initative) (Availability Mode: SUPPORTED) INVESTIGATORS Name Institution E-Mail Dr. Nitya Kallivayalil (PI) (Contact) The University of Virginia [email protected] Prof. Andrew Wetzel (CoI) (Contact) University of California - Davis [email protected] Dr. Joshua D. Simon (CoI) Carnegie Institution of Washington [email protected] Dr. Tobias Fritz (CoI) The University of Virginia [email protected] Dr. Erik Tollerud (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Alis Deason (CoI) (ESA Member) Durham Univ. [email protected] Dr. Sangmo Tony Sohn (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Roeland P. van der Marel (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Gurtina Besla (CoI) University of Arizona [email protected] Prof. Marla C. Geha (CoI) Yale University [email protected] Dr. Steven R. Majewski (CoI) The University of Virginia [email protected] Dr. Evan Kirby (CoI) California Institute of Technology [email protected] Prof. Puragra Guhathakurta (CoI) University of California - Santa Cruz [email protected] Dr. Thomas M. Brown (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] Dr. Jay Anderson (CoI) Space Telescope Science Institute [email protected] VISITS 1 Proposal 14734 (STScI Edit Number: 18,
    [Show full text]
  • Gaia RR Lyrae Stars in Nearby Ultra-Faint Dwarf Satellite Galaxies
    Draft version January 7, 2020 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 Gaia RR Lyrae Stars in Nearby Ultra-Faint Dwarf Satellite Galaxies A. Katherina Vivas,1 Clara Mart´ınez-Vazquez´ ,1 and Alistair R. Walker1 1Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory, NSF's National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research Laboratory, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile Submitted to ApJSS ABSTRACT We search for RR Lyrae stars in 27 nearby (< 100 kpc) ultra-faint dwarf satellite galaxies using the Gaia DR2 catalog of RR Lyrae stars. Based on proper motions, magnitudes and location on the sky, we associate 47 Gaia RR Lyrae stars to 14 different satellites. Distances based on RR Lyrae stars are provided for those galaxies. We have identified RR Lyrae stars for the first time in the Tucana II dwarf galaxy, and find additional members in Ursa Major II, Coma Berenices, Hydrus I, Bootes I and Bootes III. In addition we have identified candidate extra-tidal RR Lyrae stars in six galaxies which suggest they may be undergoing tidal disruption. We found 10 galaxies have no RR Lyrae stars neither in Gaia nor in the literature. However, given the known completeness of Gaia DR2 we cannot conclude these galaxies indeed lack variable stars of this type. Keywords: galaxies: dwarf | galaxies: stellar content | Local Group | stars: variables: RR Lyrae stars 1. INTRODUCTION horizontal branch (HB), which makes the task of mea- Ultra-Faint dwarfs (UFDs) are the most common suring an accurate distance to the UFDs very difficult. type among the satellite galaxies of the Milky Way. The main sequence turnoff is not generally available These tiny galaxies are valuable for our understanding from the discovery (survey) photometry if the galaxy of galaxy formation since they are the smallest dark- is more than ∼ 50 kpc distant, and in addition, the con- matter dominated systems known.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1508.03622V2 [Astro-Ph.GA] 6 Nov 2015 – 2 –
    Eight Ultra-faint Galaxy Candidates Discovered in Year Two of the Dark Energy Survey 1; 2;3; 4;5 6;7 6;7 8;4;5 A. Drlica-Wagner ∗, K. Bechtol y, E. S. Rykoff , E. Luque , A. Queiroz , Y.-Y. Mao , R. H. Wechsler8;4;5, J. D. Simon9, B. Santiago6;7, B. Yanny1, E. Balbinot10;7, S. Dodelson1;11, A. Fausti Neto7, D. J. James12, T. S. Li13, M. A. G. Maia7;14, J. L. Marshall13, A. Pieres6;7, K. Stringer13, A. R. Walker12, T. M. C. Abbott12, F. B. Abdalla15;16, S. Allam1, A. Benoit-L´evy15, G. M. Bernstein17, E. Bertin18;19, D. Brooks15, E. Buckley-Geer1, D. L. Burke4;5, A. Carnero Rosell7;14, M. Carrasco Kind20;21, J. Carretero22;23, M. Crocce22, L. N. da Costa7;14, S. Desai24;25, H. T. Diehl1, J. P. Dietrich24;25, P. Doel15, T. F. Eifler17;26, A. E. Evrard27;28, D. A. Finley1, B. Flaugher1, P. Fosalba22, J. Frieman1;11, E. Gaztanaga22, D. W. Gerdes28, D. Gruen29;30, R. A. Gruendl20;21, G. Gutierrez1, K. Honscheid31;32, K. Kuehn33, N. Kuropatkin1, O. Lahav15, P. Martini31;34, R. Miquel35;23, B. Nord1, R. Ogando7;14, A. A. Plazas26, K. Reil5, A. Roodman4;5, M. Sako17, E. Sanchez36, V. Scarpine1, M. Schubnell28, I. Sevilla-Noarbe36;20, R. C. Smith12, M. Soares-Santos1, F. Sobreira1;7, E. Suchyta31;32, M. E. C. Swanson21, G. Tarle28, D. Tucker1, V. Vikram37, W. Wester1, Y. Zhang28, J. Zuntz38 (The DES Collaboration) arXiv:1508.03622v2 [astro-ph.GA] 6 Nov 2015 { 2 { *[email protected] [email protected] 1Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Velocity Anisotropy of the Milky Way Satellite System
    MNRAS 000,1–16 (2019) Preprint 6 August 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 The velocity anisotropy of the Milky Way satellite system Alexander H. Riley,1? Azadeh Fattahi,2 Andrew B. Pace,1y Louis E. Strigari,1 Carlos S. Frenk,2 Facundo A. Gómez,3;4 Robert J. J. Grand,5;6;7 Federico Marinacci,8 Julio F. Navarro,9 Rüdiger Pakmor,7 Christine M. Simpson,10;11 and Simon D. M. White7 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 2Institute for Computational Cosmology, Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK 3Instituto de Investigación Multidisciplinar en Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad de La Serena, Raúl Bitrán 1305, La Serena, Chile 4Departamento de Física y Astronomía, Universidad de La Serena, Av. Juan Cisternas 1200 N, La Serena, Chile 5Heidelberger Institut für Theoretische Studien, Schloß-Wolfsbrunnenweg 35, 69118 Heidelberg, Germany 6Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Astronomisches Recheninstitut, Mönchhofstr. 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany 7Max-Planck-Institut für Astrophysik, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 1, D-85748, Garching, Germany 8Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 9Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, V8P 1A1, Canada 10Enrico Fermi Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA 11Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Accepted 2019 April 4. Received 2019 March 24; in original form 2018 October 24 ABSTRACT We analyse the orbital kinematics of the Milky Way (MW) satellite system utilizing the latest systemic proper motions for 38 satellites based on data from Gaia Data Release 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(ICRC2019)509 Factors and Incorporate the − J Factor in a Combined Analysis
    Prospect for dark matter annihilation signatures from gamma-ray observation of dwarf galaxies by LHAASO PoS(ICRC2019)509 Xiao-Jun Bi∗ Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China E-mail: [email protected] Su-Jie Lin Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China E-mail: [email protected] Peng-Fei Yin Key Laboratory of Particle Astrophysics, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China E-mail: [email protected] The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) is a next generation observatory for high energy gamma-rays and cosmic rays with a wide field of view, which is sensitive to gamma-rays from 300 GeV to 1 PeV. LHAASO is an ideal experiment to explore the gamma-ray signatures induced by annihilation of heavy dark matter (DM) particles in dwarf spheroidal satel- lite galaxies (dSphs). In this study, we investigate the LHAASO sensitivity to the DM annihilation at DM masses above 1TeV. We consider nineteen dSphs with large J−factors and incorporate the statistical uncertainties of the J−factor in a combined analysis. Comparing with current limits, we find that LHAASO is sensitive to the annihilation signatures for DM masses from several TeV up to 100 TeV. 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference -ICRC2019- July 24th - August 1st, 2019 Madison, WI, U.S.A. ∗Speaker. ⃝c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft181 182Chapter 10
    Chapter 10 Formation and evolution of the Local Group 480 Myr <t< 13.7 Gyr; 10 >z> 0; 30 K > T > 2.725 K The fact that the [G]alactic system is a member of a group is a very fortunate accident. Edwin Hubble, The Realm of the Nebulae Summary: The Local Group (LG) is the group of galaxies gravitationally associ- ated with the Galaxy and M 31. Galaxies within the LG have overcome the general expansion of the universe. There are approximately 75 galaxies in the LG within a 12 diameter of ∼3 Mpc having a total mass of 2-5 × 10 M⊙. A strong morphology- density relation exists in which gas-poor dwarf spheroidals (dSphs) are preferentially found closer to the Galaxy/M 31 than gas-rich dwarf irregulars (dIrrs). This is often promoted as evidence of environmental processes due to the massive Galaxy and M 31 driving the evolutionary change between dwarf galaxy types. High Veloc- ity Clouds (HVCs) are likely to be either remnant gas left over from the formation of the Galaxy, or associated with other galaxies that have been tidally disturbed by the Galaxy. Our Galaxy halo is about 12 Gyr old. A thin disk with ongoing star formation and older thick disk built by z ≥ 2 minor mergers exist. The Galaxy and M 31 will merge in 5.9 Gyr and ultimately resemble an elliptical galaxy. The LG has −1 vLG = 627 ± 22 km s with respect to the CMB. About 44% of the LG motion is due to the infall into the region of the Great Attractor, and the remaining amount of motion is due to more distant overdensities between 130 and 180 h−1 Mpc, primarily the Shapley supercluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter Gets a Little Darker
    Spotlights Dark Matter Gets Such a weakly interacting massive HAWC is not a system of lenses and mirrors a Little Darker particle (WIMP) could account for the but a collection of ultrapure water tanks In the 1970s, astronomers realized that majority of dark matter (with comparatively wired up with ultrasensitive light detectors. galaxies are filled with dark matter: little dark matter in the form of chunkier Whenever a very-high-energy particle matter that doesn’t emit, absorb, or block things like black holes and very dim stars). from space collides with an air molecule light (like stars, gas, or dust) but still But if a WIMP can pass clean through overhead, a spray of subatomic particles exerts a gravitational force, as measured the earth, then it can also pass clean rains downward and generates a faint flash by the orbital speeds of stars and other through the specialized machines that of blue light in HAWC’s water tanks. It just objects circling around the centers of earthlings build to detect it. Nonetheless, so happens that—in theory, at least— galaxies. For a typical galaxy like our own a number of dark matter detectors have WIMPs that collide with one another or Milky Way, there is about ten times more been built, running for years on end and decay should produce very-high-energy dark matter than all the “regular” forms accumulating enough non-detections to gamma rays capable of triggering of matter combined. rule out various categories of WIMPs and this event. Four decades of intensive scrutiny other dark matter candidates.
    [Show full text]