Investigating the Role of Innate Inflammatory Pathways During Infection with Murine Coronavirus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Investigating the Role of Innate Inflammatory Pathways During Infection with Murine Coronavirus University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2015 Investigating the Role of Innate Inflammatory Pathways During Infection With Murine Coronavirus Zachary Bestor Zalinger University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Allergy and Immunology Commons, Immunology and Infectious Disease Commons, Medical Immunology Commons, and the Virology Commons Recommended Citation Zalinger, Zachary Bestor, "Investigating the Role of Innate Inflammatory Pathways During Infection With Murine Coronavirus" (2015). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2123. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2123 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2123 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigating the Role of Innate Inflammatory Pathways During Infection With Murine Coronavirus Abstract Multicellular organisms are constantly exposed to microorganisms, such as viruses and bacteria, many of which are infectious pathogens. The immune system evolved to provide protection against these organisms, and includes numerous components to defend against a diverse, rapidly evolving pool of pathogens. The immune system is classically divided into two arms, the innate and adaptive systems. The time and metabolic cost of activating the T and B cell responses are considerable, and can also have deleterious side effects if the response is not properly controlled. Therefore, the adaptive immune system is carefully regulated so as to be activated only when necessary. The innate immune system serves to control most pathogens in a more rapid, less energetically expensive manner than the adaptive immune system, and to help regulate subsequent immune responses, guiding and controlling them in order to most efficiently clear pathogens with a minimum of pathological side effects. Among the first elements of the innate system that pathogens encounter are pattern recognition receptors, invariant receptors that detect conserved pathogen associated molecular patterns. Upon recognizing its binding ligand, a pattern recognition receptor will activate a signaling cascade that often triggers production and/or release of one or more pro- inflammatory cytokines. These in turn modulate additional elements of both the innate and adaptive immune responses, and are often critical lynchpins of host defense. Due to this central role in the immune system we investigated the roles of two distinct innate inflammatory pathways, the inflammasome and the MDA5-dependent portion of the type 1 interferon response, during infection with the murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus (MHV). Utilizing transgenic mice deficient in Caspase-1 and -11, which catalyze all inflammasome processing, the IL-1 receptor, the IL-18 receptor, or MDA5, we characterize the disease course and subsequent immune response following infection with MHV, a model murine coronavirus. We find that inflammasome signaling is otectivpr e during infection, and that much or all of this protection is mediated by IL-18 signaling driving production of interferon gamma by T cells. We also demonstrate that MDA5 signaling controls viral tropism and replication, and that in its absence the host immune response becomes over active, likely leading to lethal pathology. Overall, our studies help define how innate inflammatory pathways can have diverse influences on pathogenesis and the immune response. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group Cell & Molecular Biology First Advisor Susan R. Weiss Subject Categories Allergy and Immunology | Immunology and Infectious Disease | Medical Immunology | Virology This dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2123 INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF INNATE INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS DURING INFECTION WITH MURINE CORONAVIRUS Zachary B. Zalinger A DISSERTATION in Cell and Molecular Biology Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2015 Supervisor of Dissertation _____________________ Susan R. Weiss Professor of Microbiology Graduate Group Chairperson _____________________ Daniel S. Kessler, Associate Professor of Cell and Developmental Biology Dissertation Committee: Igor E. Brodsky, Assistant Professor of Pathobiology Christopher A. Hunter, Professor of Pathobiology Dennis L. Kolson, Professor of Neurology Glenn F. Rall, Professor, Fox Chase Cancer Center Luis J. Sigal, Professor, Jefferson University INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF INNATE INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS DURING INFECTION WITH MURINE CORONAVIRUS COPYRIGHT 2015 Zachary B. Zalinger This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-ny-sa/2.0 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my mentor, Dr. Susan Weiss, for her support and guidance, and the members of her laboratory for their patience. I would also like to thank my friends and classmates in Philadelphia, who have made these long years tolerable, and the completion of my time here bittersweet. I will miss them all. I am especially thankful for Dr. Cierra Casson, whose brilliance and love has made all the difference. Without her I would not be standing here today. And finally I would like to thank my family for all their support and acceptance over the years. My parents, Wendy Bestor and Lee Zalinger, who taught me that knowledge has its own value. And my grandfathers, Dr. Alvin Zalinger, who I never knew but who I hope would have been proud of me, and Dr. Charles Bestor, who has always been a shining example of the value of the intellectual life. iii ABSTRACT INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF INNATE INFLAMMATORY PATHWAYS DURING INFECTION WITH MURINE CORONAVIRUS Zachary B. Zalinger Susan R. Weiss Multicellular organisms are constantly exposed to microorganisms, such as viruses and bacteria, many of which are infectious pathogens. The immune system evolved to provide protection against these organisms, and includes numerous components to defend against a diverse, rapidly evolving pool of pathogens. The immune system is classically divided into two arms, the innate and adaptive systems. The time and metabolic cost of activating the T and B cell responses are considerable, and can also have deleterious side effects if the response is not properly controlled. Therefore, the adaptive immune system is carefully regulated so as to be activated only when necessary. The innate immune system serves to control most pathogens in a more rapid, less energetically expensive manner than the adaptive immune system, and to help regulate subsequent immune responses, guiding and controlling them in order to most efficiently clear pathogens with a minimum of pathological side effects. Among the first elements of the innate system that pathogens encounter are pattern recognition receptors, invariant receptors that detect conserved pathogen associated molecular patterns. Upon recognizing its binding ligand, a pattern recognition receptor will activate a signaling cascade that often triggers production and/or release of one or more pro- inflammatory cytokines. These in turn modulate additional elements of both the innate and adaptive immune responses, and are often critical lynchpins of host defense. Due to this central role in the immune system we investigated the roles of two distinct innate inflammatory pathways, the inflammasome and the MDA5-dependent portion of the type 1 interferon response, during infection with the murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus (MHV). Utilizing transgenic mice deficient in Caspase-1 and -11, which catalyze all inflammasome processing, the IL-1 receptor, the IL-18 receptor, or MDA5, we characterize the disease course and subsequent immune response following infection with MHV, a model murine coronavirus. We find that inflammasome signaling is protective during infection, and that much or all of this protection is mediated by IL-18 signaling driving production of interferon gamma by T cells. We also demonstrate that MDA5 signaling controls viral tropism and replication, and that in its absence the host immune response becomes over active, likely leading to lethal pathology. Overall, our studies help define how innate inflammatory pathways can have diverse influences on pathogenesis and the immune response. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Content Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT…………………..…………………………………………..………….iii ABSTRACT……..…………………………………………………………………………..……iv TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………...…………….v LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………….……………...vii LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS…..………………………………………………………………..viii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION…….………………………………………..…………………1 A. Structure and function of the inflammasome……………………………….………..3 B. Ligands of inflammasome sensors………………………………………….………...4 C. The non-canonical inflammasome……………………………………….……………6 D. Inflammasome-mediated cell death………………………………….………………..7 E. IL-1 signaling…………………………………………………………………………….8 F. IL-18 signaling…………………………………………………………………………...9 G. Role of the inflammasome in demyelination……………………….……………….10 H. Structure and function of MDA5…………………………………….………………..12 I. MDA5’s binding substrate(s) …………………………………….…………………..14 J. The type 1 interferon signaling pathway…………………………………………….14 K. The role of type 1 interferon during acute infection………………………………..15 L. The interferon
Recommended publications
  • Immunome Announces Creation of COVID-19
    Immunome Announces Creation of COVID-19 Advisory Board Advisory Board to help guide development and clinical testing of biosynthetic convalescent plasma as a potential COVID-19 treatment and prevention of disease September 16, 2020 07:00 AM Eastern Daylight Time EXTON, Pa.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Immunome, a biotechnology company harnessing the human B cell response to develop potentially first-in-class investigational therapeutics for oncology and infectious diseases, announced today the appointments of Michael Diamond, MD, PhD, Jeffrey Henderson, MD, PhD, Shmuel Shoham, MD, and Susan Weiss, PhD, to its newly created COVID-19 Advisory Board. Immunome was recently awarded up to $13.3M from the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) to use its proprietary technology to develop a novel biosynthetic convalescent plasma (BCP), derived from COVID-19 super responders, as a new potential approach to combat the pandemic. Through this effort, Immunome intends to identify a combination of antibodies that are broadly active against the virus and enable multiple viral clearance mechanisms and to synthetically manufacture for non- clinical and clinical development. “This new advisory board will provide fundamental guidance on our efforts to develop a biosynthetic convalescent plasma product candidate to treat COVID-19 patients,” said Purnanand Sarma, PhD, president and CEO of Immunome. “I am pleased to welcome these talented researchers and look forward to working together to leverage our proprietary technology to identify and develop antibodies that are potently active against this deadly virus.” Dr. Michael Diamond is the Herbert S. Gasser Professor of Medicine and a Professor of Molecular Microbiology and of Pathology and Immunology at the Washington University School of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Protect Against Different
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.446491; this version posted June 1, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. SARS coronavirus vaccines protect against different coronaviruses Tanushree Dangi#1, Nicole Palacio#1, Sarah Sanchez1, Jacob Class2, Lavanya Visvabharathy3, Thomas Ciucci4,5, Igor Koralnik3, Justin Richner*2, Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster*1 1Department of Microbiology-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. 2Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Illinois in Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. 3Division of Neuro-Infectious Diseases & Global Neurology. 4David H. Smith Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. 5Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Center for Vaccine Biology and Immunology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA. #These authors contributed equally *Correspondence: Justin Richner ([email protected]) & Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster ([email protected]) 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.01.446491; this version posted June 1, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Although SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2, it is unclear if they can also protect against other coronaviruses that may infect humans in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Infectious Disease in Mice: Co-Adaptation and the Role of Host-Specific Ifnc Responses
    Opinion Modeling Infectious Disease in Mice: Co-Adaptation and the Role of Host-Specific IFNc Responses Jo¨ rn Coers1*, Michael N. Starnbach1, Jonathan C. Howard2 1 Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America, 2 Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany The advantages of the mouse as a inability of a pathogen to colonize the and rodents, binds complement inhibitory model organism in biomedical research non-typical host effectively. Colonization molecules of either host species and evades are many. The molecular and genetic often relies on species-specific interactions both human and rodent serum-mediated toolbox developed for the mouse over the of microbial ligands with host cell recep- killing [4]. This example illustrates a last 100 years enables researchers to tors. For example, the bacterial effector general principle: a pathogen must be able manipulate and study gene function in internalin A expressed by Listeria monocyto- to endure or overcome innate immune vivo almost at will. Time and time again, genes binds to the host E-cadherin receptor responses that drastically interfere with its scientific findings obtained through the use to mediate bacterial internalization, an survival and/or transmission to another of mouse models have proven to be essential step for the microbe to breach the suitable host. Pathogens must, therefore, relevant to human health. The field of intestinal epithelial barrier after oral have evolved subversion strategies for all immunology in particular has profited ingestion [2]. A single amino acid change the innate immune mechanisms that, if tremendously from the powers of the in the mouse ortholog of E-cadherin unrestricted, would result in their demise.
    [Show full text]
  • Is the ZIKV Congenital Syndrome and Microcephaly Due to Syndemism with Latent Virus Coinfection?
    viruses Review Is the ZIKV Congenital Syndrome and Microcephaly Due to Syndemism with Latent Virus Coinfection? Solène Grayo Institut Pasteur de Guinée, BP 4416 Conakry, Guinea; [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: The emergence of the Zika virus (ZIKV) mirrors its evolutionary nature and, thus, its ability to grow in diversity or complexity (i.e., related to genome, host response, environment changes, tropism, and pathogenicity), leading to it recently joining the circle of closed congenital pathogens. The causal relation of ZIKV to microcephaly is still a much-debated issue. The identification of outbreak foci being in certain endemic urban areas characterized by a high-density population emphasizes that mixed infections might spearhead the recent appearance of a wide range of diseases that were initially attributed to ZIKV. Globally, such coinfections may have both positive and negative effects on viral replication, tropism, host response, and the viral genome. In other words, the possibility of coinfection may necessitate revisiting what is considered to be known regarding the pathogenesis and epidemiology of ZIKV diseases. ZIKV viral coinfections are already being reported with other arboviruses (e.g., chikungunya virus (CHIKV) and dengue virus (DENV)) as well as congenital pathogens (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytomegalovirus (HCMV)). However, descriptions of human latent viruses and their impacts on ZIKV disease outcomes in hosts are currently lacking. This review proposes to select some interesting human latent viruses (i.e., herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2), Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6), human parvovirus B19 (B19V), and human papillomavirus (HPV)), whose virological features and Citation: Grayo, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Improved Bacterial Recombineering by Parallelized Protein Discovery
    Improved bacterial recombineering by parallelized protein discovery Timothy M. Wanniera,1, Akos Nyergesa,b, Helene M. Kuchwaraa, Márton Czikkelyb, Dávid Baloghb, Gabriel T. Filsingera, Nathaniel C. Bordersa, Christopher J. Gregga, Marc J. Lajoiea, Xavier Riosa, Csaba Pálb, and George M. Churcha,1 aDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and bSynthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Centre, Szeged HU-6726, Hungary Edited by Susan Gottesman, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and approved April 17, 2020 (received for review January 30, 2020) Exploiting bacteriophage-derived homologous recombination pro- recombineering, is the molecular mechanism that drives MAGE cesses has enabled precise, multiplex editing of microbial genomes and DIvERGE (4, 32, 33). This method was first described in and the construction of billions of customized genetic variants in a E. coli, and is most commonly promoted by the expression of bet single day. The techniques that enable this, multiplex automated ge- (here referred to as Redβ) from the Red operon of Escherichia nome engineering (MAGE) and directed evolution with random ge- phage λ (5, 6, 34). Redβ is an ssDNA-annealing protein (SSAP) nomic mutations (DIvERGE), are however, currently limited to a whose role in recombineering is to anneal ssDNA to compli- handful of microorganisms for which single-stranded DNA-annealing mentary genomic DNA at the replication fork. Although im- proteins (SSAPs) that promote efficient recombineering have been provements to recombineering efficiency have been made (7–9), identified. Thus, to enable genome-scale engineering in new hosts, the core protein machinery has remained constant, with Redβ efficient SSAPs must first be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogen Genetics: S. Aureus Multi-Host Tropism
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS IN BRIEF GENETIC TESTING Genetic risk and statin preventative therapy Mega, Stitziel et al. test the clinical use of a multi-locus genetic risk score including a composite of 27 genetic variants associated with coronary heart disease. In community-based and primary or secondary prevention studies, they find that a higher genetic risk score is associated with increased risk of incident or recurrent coronary heart disease events, adjusted for clinical risk factors. Those in the highest genetic risk score categories derived greater benefits from statin preventative therapy, with greater relative and absolute disease risk reductions in randomized controlled trials for primary and secondary prevention. Although further testing in stratified prospective trials will be needed to directly test the clinical benefit of using a genetic risk score as the basis of selective statin therapy, the current study provides an indicator of how genetic screening may prove useful in identifying subpopulations that are more likely to benefit from preventative therapy. ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER Mega, J. L., Stitziel , N. O. et al. Genetic risk, coronary heart disease events, and the clinical benefit of statin therapy: an analysis of primary and secondary prevention trials. The Lancet http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(14)61730-X (2015) PATHOGEN GENETICS S. aureus multi-host tropism The Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex CC121 is a common cause of human skin and soft-tissue infections, as well as the source of a recent epidemic in rabbits. Viana et al. track the evolution of the multi-host tropism of this lineage. Phylogenetic analysis based on whole-genome sequences of a global collection of CC121 clinical strains showed a high level of diversity for the strains isolated from human cases, whereas the strains isolated from rabbits fell into a single clade.
    [Show full text]
  • How Host Cells Defend Against Influenza a Virus Infection
    viruses Review Host–Virus Interaction: How Host Cells Defend against Influenza A Virus Infection Yun Zhang 1 , Zhichao Xu and Yongchang Cao * State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510006, China; [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (Z.X.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-020-39332938 Received: 28 February 2020; Accepted: 25 March 2020; Published: 29 March 2020 Abstract: Influenza A viruses (IAVs) are highly contagious pathogens infecting human and numerous animals. The viruses cause millions of infection cases and thousands of deaths every year, thus making IAVs a continual threat to global health. Upon IAV infection, host innate immune system is triggered and activated to restrict virus replication and clear pathogens. Subsequently, host adaptive immunity is involved in specific virus clearance. On the other hand, to achieve a successful infection, IAVs also apply multiple strategies to avoid be detected and eliminated by the host immunity. In the current review, we present a general description on recent work regarding different host cells and molecules facilitating antiviral defenses against IAV infection and how IAVs antagonize host immune responses. Keywords: influenza A virus; innate immunity; adaptive immunity 1. Introduction Influenza A virus (IAV) can infect a wide range of warm-blooded animals, including birds, pigs, horses, and humans. In humans, the viruses cause respiratory disease and be transmitted by inhalation of virus-containing dust particles or aerosols [1]. Severe IAV infection can cause lung inflammation and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which may lead to mortality. Thus, causing many influenza epidemics and pandemics, IAV has been a threat to public health for decades [2].
    [Show full text]
  • The SARS-Cov-2 Spike Protein Has a Broad Tropism for Mammalian ACE2 Proteins 2 3 Carina Conceicao*1, Nazia Thakur*1, Stacey Human1, James T
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.17.156471; this version posted June 18, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 The SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein has a broad tropism for mammalian ACE2 proteins 2 3 Carina Conceicao*1, Nazia Thakur*1, Stacey Human1, James T. Kelly1, Leanne Logan1, 4 Dagmara Bialy1, Sushant Bhat1, Phoebe Stevenson-Leggett1, Adrian K. Zagrajek1, Philippa 5 Hollinghurst1,2, Michal Varga1, Christina Tsirigoti1, John A. Hammond1, Helena J. Maier1, Erica 6 Bickerton1, Holly Shelton1, Isabelle Dietrich1, Stephen C. Graham3, Dalan Bailey¥1 7 8 1 The Pirbright Institute, Woking, Surrey, GU24 0NF, UK 9 2 Department of Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of 10 Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK 11 3 Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 12 1QP, UK 13 14 * These authors contributed equally to the work 15 ¥ Corresponding author: [email protected] 16 17 Abstract 18 19 SARS-CoV-2 emerged in late 2019, leading to the COVID-19 pandemic that continues to 20 cause significant global mortality in human populations. Given its sequence similarity to SARS- 21 CoV, as well as related coronaviruses circulating in bats, SARS-CoV-2 is thought to have 22 originated in Chiroptera species in China. However, whether the virus spread directly to 23 humans or through an intermediate host is currently unclear, as is the potential for this virus 24 to infect companion animals, livestock and wildlife that could act as viral reservoirs.
    [Show full text]
  • Virus-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Virus-Mediated Cell-Cell Fusion Héloïse Leroy 1,2,3, Mingyu Han 1,2,3 , Marie Woottum 1,2,3 , Lucie Bracq 4 , Jérôme Bouchet 5 , Maorong Xie 6 and Serge Benichou 1,2,3,* 1 Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, 75014 Paris, France; [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (M.W.) 2 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique CNRS, UMR8104, 75014 Paris, France 3 Faculty of Health, University of Paris, 75014 Paris, France 4 Global Health Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; lucie.bracq@epfl.ch 5 Laboratory Orofacial Pathologies, Imaging and Biotherapies UR2496, University of Paris, 92120 Montrouge, France; [email protected] 6 Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 20 November 2020; Accepted: 14 December 2020; Published: 17 December 2020 Abstract: Cell-cell fusion between eukaryotic cells is a general process involved in many physiological and pathological conditions, including infections by bacteria, parasites, and viruses. As obligate intracellular pathogens, viruses use intracellular machineries and pathways for efficient replication in their host target cells. Interestingly, certain viruses, and, more especially, enveloped viruses belonging to different viral families and including human pathogens, can mediate cell-cell fusion between infected cells and neighboring non-infected cells. Depending of the cellular environment and tissue organization, this virus-mediated cell-cell fusion leads to the merge of membrane and cytoplasm contents and formation of multinucleated cells, also called syncytia, that can express high amount of viral antigens in tissues and organs of infected hosts.
    [Show full text]
  • Innate Immune Antagonism by Diverse Coronavirus Phosphodiesterases Stephen Goldstein University of Pennsylvania, [email protected]
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2019 Innate Immune Antagonism By Diverse Coronavirus Phosphodiesterases Stephen Goldstein University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Allergy and Immunology Commons, Immunology and Infectious Disease Commons, Medical Immunology Commons, and the Virology Commons Recommended Citation Goldstein, Stephen, "Innate Immune Antagonism By Diverse Coronavirus Phosphodiesterases" (2019). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 3363. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3363 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/3363 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Innate Immune Antagonism By Diverse Coronavirus Phosphodiesterases Abstract Coronaviruses comprise a large family of viruses within the order Nidovirales containing single-stranded positive-sense RNA genomes of 27-32 kilobases. Divided into four genera (alpha, beta, gamma, delta) and multiple newly defined subgenera, coronaviruses include a number of important human and livestock pathogens responsible for a range of diseases. Historically, human coronaviruses OC43 and 229E have been associated with up to 30% of common colds, while the 2002 emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome- associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV) first raised the specter of these viruses as possible pandemic agents. Although the SARS-CoV pandemic was quickly contained and the virus has not returned, the 2012 discovery of Middle East respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus (MERS-CoV) once again elevated coronaviruses to a list of global public health threats. The eg netic diversity of these viruses has resulted in their utilization of both conserved and unique mechanisms of interaction with infected host cells. Like all viruses, coronaviruses encode multiple mechanisms for evading, suppressing, or otherwise circumventing host antiviral responses.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vital Gene for Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Replication in Human Cells COMMENTARY Gerd Suttera,B,1
    COMMENTARY A vital gene for modified vaccinia virus Ankara replication in human cells COMMENTARY Gerd Suttera,b,1 Vaccinia virus (VACV), the prototype orthopoxvirus, is the first live viral vaccine used to protect against small- pox, one of the most feared infectious diseases of hu- mans (1). This outstanding achievement was possible because even as the various orthopoxviruses evolved and diversified they often retained major parts of their virion composition in common. In consequence, pro- ductive infection with one orthopoxvirus, VACV, effec- tively immunizes the host against infection by other orthopoxviruses including variola virus, the closely re- lated agent of smallpox. Successful vaccination against smallpox positively correlated with the productive rep- lication of VACV in the skin of vaccinated individuals. However, on occasion the inoculation of live VACV had risk because the vaccine virus could develop general- ized infections and cause other severe adverse events following vaccination (2). Ever since, research with VACV Fig. 1. Schematic overview of the MVA life cycle and important virus proteins – seeks to elucidate the many secrets of this unique virus to overcome intracellular host restrictions in human cells. As all poxviruses, MVA human host interaction. What makes VACV efficiently replicates in the cytoplasm of infected cells. Following entry, the virus replication grow in human cells? This might sound like a simple comprises three steps of viral RNA and protein synthesis defined as expression question since the growth tropism of many other viruses of early, intermediate, and late viral genes. Production and processing of late structural proteins result in the morphogenesis of new infectious virions is largely determined by the binding of a specific viral enveloped by one or two additional lipid membranes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tissue and Host Tropism of Influenza Viruses: Importance of Quantitative Analysis
    Science in China Series C: Life Sciences www.scichina.com life.scichina.com © 2009 SCIENCE IN CHINA PRESS www.springer.com/scp www.springerlink.com Review Tissue and host tropism of influenza viruses: Importance of quantitative analysis ZHANG Hong1,2 1 Z-BioMed, Inc., Rockville, MD 20855, USA; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Zunyi 563003, China It is generally accepted that human influenza viruses preferentially bind to cell-surface glycoproteins/ glycolipids containing sialic acids in α2,6-linkage; while avian and equine influenza viruses preferen- tially bind to those containing sialic acids in α2,3-linkage. Even though this generalized view is accurate for H3 subtype isolates, it may not be accurate and absolute for all subtypes of influenza A viruses and, therefore, needs to be reevaluated carefully and realistically. Some of the studies published in major scientific journals on the subject of tissue tropism of influenza viruses are inconsistent and caused confusion in the scientific community. One of the reasons for the inconsistency is that most studies were quantitative descriptions of sialic acid receptor distributions based on lectin or influenza virus immunohistochemistry results with limited numbers of stained cells. In addition, recent studies indicate that α2,3- and α2,6-linked sialic acids are not the sole receptors determining tissue and host tropism of influenza viruses. In fact, determinants for tissue and host tropism of human, avian and animal influenza viruses are more complex than what has been generally accepted. Other factors, such as glycan topology, concentration of invading viruses, local density of receptors, lipid raft microdomains, coreceptors or sialic acid-independent receptors, may also be important.
    [Show full text]