DOCSLIB.ORG

Intrinsic Differential Geometry with Geometric Calculus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MM Research Preprints, 196{205 MMRC, AMSS, Academia Sinica No. 23, December 2004 Intrinsic Di®erential Geometry with Geometric Calculus Hongbo Li and Lina Cao Mathematics Mechanization Key Laboratory Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100080, China Abstract. Setting up a symbolic algebraic system is the ¯rst step in mathematics mechanization of any branch of mathematics. In this paper, we establish a compact symbolic algebraic framework for local geometric computing in intrinsic di®erential ge- ometry, by choosing only the Lie derivative and the covariant derivative as basic local di®erential operators. In this framework, not only geometric entities such as the curva- ture and torsion of an a±ne connection have elegant representations, but their involved local geometric computing can be simpli¯ed. Keywords: Intrinsic di®erential geometry, Cli®ord algebra, Mathematics mecha- nization, Symbolic geometric computing. 1. Introduction Mathematics mechanization focuses on solving mathematical problems with symbolic computation techniques, particularly on mathematical reasoning by algebraic manipulation of mathematical symbols. In di®erential geometry, the mechanization viz. mechanical the- orem proving, is initiated by [7] using local coordinate representation. On the other hand, in modern di®erential geometry the dominant algebraic framework is moving frames and di®erential forms [1], which are independent of local coordinates. For mechanical theorem proving in spatial surface theory, [3], [4], [5] proposed to use di®erential forms and moving frames as basic algebraic tools. It appears that di®erential geometry bene¯ts from both local coordinates and global invariants [6]. For extrinsic di®erential geometry, [2] proposed to use Cli®ord algebra and vector deriva- tive viz. Dirac operator as basic algebraic tools. This framework combines local and global representations, and conforms with the classical framework of vector analysis. The current paper intends to extend this representation to intrinsic di®erential geometry. In intrinsic di®erential geometry, there is already an algebraic system abundant in coordinate- free operators: Algebraic operators: tensor product ­, exterior product ^, interior product ix, contrac- tion C, the pairing c between a vector space and its dual, Riemannian metric tensor g, etc. Intrinsic Di®erential Geometry 197 Di®erential operators: exterior di®erentiation d, Lie derivative Lx, the bracket [x; y] of tangent vector ¯elds x; y, covariant di®erentiation Dx, curvature tensor R, torsion tensor T , etc. In our opinion, the existing algebraic system contains a lot of redundancy, which may complicate its mechanization. The ¯rst task should be to reduce the number of basic oper- ators in the above list, in order to gain both compact representation and e®ective symbolic manipulation for both local and global geometric computing. This task is ful¯lled in this paper. We propose a compact algebraic framework for local geometric computing in intrinsic di®erential geometry. We select the following operators as basic ones: Basic algebraic operators: tensor product ­, exterior product ^, interior product \¢". Basic local di®erential operators: Lie derivative La, vector derivative @, covariant dif- ferentiations ±a and ±. Basic global di®erential operators: Lie derivative Lx, exterior di®erentiation d, covari- ant di®erentiation ±. This framework is suitable for studying intrinsic properties of general vector bundles, a±ne connections, Riemannian vector bundles, etc, and can be extended to include spin structure and integration. Some typical bene¯ts of this framework include: 1. Exterior di®erentiation d is equal to the composition of the covariant di®erentiation ±a (or ± in the case of a torsion-free a±ne connection) and the wedge product. 2. The curvature and torsion tensors can be represented elegantly by covariant di®erenti- ation. By these representations, the famous Bianchi identities are given \transparent" algebraic representations. 3. Some geometric theorems can be given simpli¯ed proofs, e.g., Schur's Lemma in Rie- mannian geometry. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we introduce some terminology and notations. In Section 3 we construct exterior di®erentiation locally by Lie derivative. In Section 4 we represent curvature tensor, torsion tensor and Bianchi identities locally by covariant di®erentiation. In Section 5 we represent the curvature tensor of Riemannian manifold explicitly as a 2-tensor of the tangent bivector bundle, and use it to give a simple proof of Schur's Lemma. 2. Some Terminology and Notations We use the same symbol \¢" to denote the pairing between a vector space and its dual space, the interior product of a tangent vector ¯eld and a di®erential form, and the inner product induced by a pseudo-Riemannian metric tensor. The explanation is that if no metric tensor occurs, then the dot symbol denotes the interior product which includes the pairing naturally; if there is a ¯xed pseudo-Riemannian metric tensor, then the tangent space and 198 H. Li and L. Cao cotangent space are identi¯ed, so are the pairing and the inner product induced by the metric. The latter identi¯cation is further justi¯ed by the fact that in Riemannian geometry, we use only the Levi-Civita covariant di®erentiation, which preserves both the inner product and the pairing. In this paper, we use the following extension [2] of the pairing \¢" from V and V¤ to their ¤ j ¤ Grassmann spaces ¤(V) and ¤(V ): for vectors xi 2 V and y 2 V , ½ 1 s 1 s (x1 ¢ (x2 ¢ (¢ ¢ ¢ (xr ¢ (y ^ ¢ ¢ ¢ ^ y ) ¢ ¢ ¢); if r · s; (x1 ^ ¢ ¢ ¢ ^ xr) ¢ (y ^ ¢ ¢ ¢ ^ y ) = 1 2 s (2.1) (¢ ¢ ¢ (x1 ^ ¢ ¢ ¢ ^ xr) ¢ y ) ¢ y ) ¢ ¢ ¢) ¢ y ); if r > s. The topic \vector derivative" is explored in detail in [2]. Let V and V¤ be an nD vector space and its dual space, Let fai j i = 1 : : : ng and fajg be a pair of dual bases of V and V¤ respectively. The vector derivative at a point x 2 V is the following V-valued ¯rst-order di®erential operator: ¯ Xn @ ¯ @ = ai ¯ : (2.2) x @a ¯ i=1 i x Here @=@aijx denotes the directional derivative at point x. Obviously, @ = @x is independent of the basis faig chosen, and for any vector a, Xn i a ¢ @ = @=@a; a = (a ¢ a )ai: (2.3) i=1 Henceforth we consider an nD di®erentiable manifold M. The tangent and cotangent bundles of M are denoted by TM and T ¤M respectively. The set of smooth tangent and cotangent vector ¯elds on M are denoted by ¡(TM) and ¡(T ¤M) respectively. The Lie derivatives of smooth scalar ¯eld f, tangent vector ¯eld y, and cotangent vector ¯eld ! with respect to a smooth tangent vector ¯eld x, are de¯ned by Lxf = x(f); Lxy = [x; y]; (2.4) y ¢ Lx(!) = Lx(y ¢ !) ¡ ! ¢ Lxy: Here [x; y] is the bracket de¯ned by [x; y](f) = x(y(f)) ¡ y(x(f)); 8 f 2 C1(M): (2.5) Below we introduce two notations. Let ¼ be a di®erential operator taking values in ¤(¡(T ¤M)). Then in ¼ ^ u ^ v, where u; v 2 ¤(¡(T ¤M)), the di®erentiation is carried out to the right hand side of ¼, i.e., to both u and v. If we want the di®erentiation be made only to u, we use ¼ ^ u_ ^ v to denote this, else if we want it be made only to v, we use ¼ ^ u· ^ v to denote this. If u itself is a di®erential operator taking values in ¤(¡(T ¤M)), then it has two parts: the ¤(¡(T ¤M))-part and the scalar-valued di®erential operator part. If the di®erentiation in ¼ is made only to the ¤(¡(T ¤M))-part of u, we use ¼ ^ u_ ^ v to denote this. If the di®erentiation is not made to the ¤(¡(T ¤M))-part of u, we use ¼ ^ u· ^ v to denote this. The scalar-valued Intrinsic Di®erential Geometry 199 di®erentiation parts s(¼), s(u) of ¼; u always act on v in the manner s(¼)s(u)v. If v is also a ¤(¡(T ¤M))-valued di®erential operator, and the di®erentiation in ¼ is made only to the ¤(¡(T ¤M))-part of v, we use ¼ ^ u ^ v_ or ¼ ^ u· ^ v_ to denote this, depending on how u is di®erentiated. 3. Exterior Di®erentiation De¯nition 3.1 A local natural basis faig of ¡(TM) at x 2 M is a set of n smooth tangent vector ¯elds de¯ned in a neighborhood N of x, such that there exists a local coordinate system fuig of N with the property @f 1 ai(f) = ; 8 f 2 C (N): (3.6) @ui i ¤ Let faig be a local basis of ¡(TM), and let fa g be its dual basis in ¡(T M). De¯ne Xn Xn a i i d = a ^ Lai = a Lai ^ : (3.7) i=1 i=1 Lemma 3.2 (1) Let faig be a local basis of ¡(TM). Then it is natural if only if [ai; aj] = 0 for any 1 · i < j · n. a 2 (2) (d ) = 0 if and only if faig is natural. Proof. We only prove the second part. By the de¯nition of da, to prove (da)2 = 0 we only need to prove (da)2f = 0 for any f 2 C1(M). Xn a 2 i j (d ) f = a ^ Lai (a aj(f)) i;j=1 Xn i j i j = (a ^ a ai(aj(f))) + aj(f)a ^ Lai (a ) i;j=1 X Xn i j i j k = [ai; aj](f)a ^ a ¡ aj(f)a ^ ([ai; ak] ¢ a )a i<j i;j;k=1 X Xn i j i k = [ai; aj](f)a ^ a ¡ [ai; ak](f)a ^ a i<jX i;k=1 i j = ¡ [ai; aj](f)a ^ a : i<j a 2 Thus (d ) f = 0 if and only if [ai; aj](f) = 0, i.e., faig is natural.
Recommended publications
  • Connections on Bundles Md

    Connections on Bundles Md

    Dhaka Univ. J. Sci. 60(2): 191-195, 2012 (July) Connections on Bundles Md. Showkat Ali, Md. Mirazul Islam, Farzana Nasrin, Md. Abu Hanif Sarkar and Tanzia Zerin Khan Department of Mathematics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh, Email: [email protected] Received on 25. 05. 2011.Accepted for Publication on 15. 12. 2011 Abstract This paper is a survey of the basic theory of connection on bundles. A connection on tangent bundle , is called an affine connection on an -dimensional smooth manifold . By the general discussion of affine connection on vector bundles that necessarily exists on which is compatible with tensors. I. Introduction = < , > (2) In order to differentiate sections of a vector bundle [5] or where <, > represents the pairing between and ∗. vector fields on a manifold we need to introduce a Then is a section of , called the absolute differential structure called the connection on a vector bundle. For quotient or the covariant derivative of the section along . example, an affine connection is a structure attached to a differentiable manifold so that we can differentiate its Theorem 1. A connection always exists on a vector bundle. tensor fields. We first introduce the general theorem of Proof. Choose a coordinate covering { }∈ of . Since connections on vector bundles. Then we study the tangent vector bundles are trivial locally, we may assume that there is bundle. is a -dimensional vector bundle determine local frame field for any . By the local structure of intrinsically by the differentiable structure [8] of an - connections, we need only construct a × matrix on dimensional smooth manifold . each such that the matrices satisfy II.
  • Multiple Valued Functions in the Geometric Calculus of Variations Astérisque, Tome 118 (1984), P

    Multiple Valued Functions in the Geometric Calculus of Variations Astérisque, Tome 118 (1984), P

    Astérisque F. J. ALMGREN B. SUPER Multiple valued functions in the geometric calculus of variations Astérisque, tome 118 (1984), p. 13-32 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AST_1984__118__13_0> © Société mathématique de France, 1984, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la collection « Astérisque » (http://smf4.emath.fr/ Publications/Asterisque/) implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’uti- lisation (http://www.numdam.org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Société Mathématique de France Astérisque 118 (1984) p.13 à 32. MULTIPLE VALUED FUNCTIONS IN THE GEOMETRIC CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS by F.J. ALMGREN and B. SUPER (Princeton University) 1. INTRODUCTION. This article is intended as an introduction and an invitation to multiple valued functions as a tool of geometric analysis. Such functions typically have a region in Rm as a domain and take values in spaces of zero dimensional integral currents in 3RN . The multiply sheeted "graphs" of such functions f represent oriented m dimensional surfaces S in 3RM+N , frequently with elaborate topological or singular structure. Perhaps the most conspicious advantage of multiple valued functions is that one is able to represent complicated surfaces S by functions f having fixed simple domains. This leads, in particular, to applications of functional analytic techniques in ways novel to essentially geometric problems, especially those arising in the geometric calculus of variations. 2. EXAMPLES AND TERMINOLOGY.
  • Curvature Tensors in a 4D Riemann–Cartan Space: Irreducible Decompositions and Superenergy

    Curvature Tensors in a 4D Riemann–Cartan Space: Irreducible Decompositions and Superenergy

    Curvature tensors in a 4D Riemann–Cartan space: Irreducible decompositions and superenergy Jens Boos and Friedrich W. Hehl [email protected] [email protected]"oeln.de University of Alberta University of Cologne & University of Missouri (uesday, %ugust 29, 17:0. Geometric Foundations of /ravity in (artu Institute of 0hysics, University of (artu) Estonia Geometric Foundations of /ravity Geometric Foundations of /auge Theory Geometric Foundations of /auge Theory ↔ Gravity The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: redundancy conserved e2ternal current 5 ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: Complex spinor 6eld: redundancy invariance conserved e2ternal current 5 conserved #7,8 current ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: Complex spinor 6eld: redundancy invariance conserved e2ternal current 5 conserved #7,8 current Complete, gauge-theoretical description: 9 local #7,) invariance ,3,. The ingredients o$ gauge theory: the e2ample o$ electrodynamics 0henomenological Ma24ell: iers Complex spinor 6eld: rce carr ry of fo mic theo rrent rosco rnal cu m pic en exte att desc gredundancyiv er; N ript oet ion o conserved e2ternal current 5 invariance her f curr conserved #7,8 current e n t s Complete, gauge-theoretical description: gauge theory = complete description of matter and 9 local #7,) invariance how it interacts via gauge bosons ,3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincaré gauge theory *3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincaré gauge theory *3,. Curvature tensors electrodynamics :ang–Mills theory /eneral Relativity 0oincar; gauge theory *3,.
  • Analyzing Non-Degenerate 2-Forms with Riemannian Metrics

    Analyzing Non-Degenerate 2-Forms with Riemannian Metrics

    EXPOSITIONES Expo. Math. 20 (2002): 329-343 © Urban & Fischer Verlag MATHEMATICAE www.u rba nfischer.de/journals/expomath Analyzing Non-degenerate 2-Forms with Riemannian Metrics Philippe Delano~ Universit~ de Nice-Sophia Antipolis Math~matiques, Parc Valrose, F-06108 Nice Cedex 2, France Abstract. We give a variational proof of the harmonicity of a symplectic form with respect to adapted riemannian metrics, show that a non-degenerate 2-form must be K~ihlerwhenever parallel for some riemannian metric, regardless of adaptation, and discuss k/ihlerness under curvature assmnptions. Introduction In the first part of this paper, we aim at a better understanding of the following folklore result (see [14, pp. 140-141] and references therein): Theorem 1 . Let a be a non-degenerate 2-form on a manifold M and g, a riemannian metric adapted to it. If a is closed, it is co-closed for g. Let us specify at once a bit of terminology. We say a riemannian metric g is adapted to a non-degenerate 2-form a on a 2m-manifold M, if at each point Xo E M there exists a chart of M in which g(Xo) and a(Xo) read like the standard euclidean metric and symplectic form of R 2m. If, moreover, this occurs for the first jets of a (resp. a and g) and the corresponding standard structures of R 2m, the couple (~r,g) is called an almost-K~ihler (resp. a K/ihler) structure; in particular, a is then closed. Given a non-degenerate, an adapted metric g can be constructed out of any riemannian metric on M, using Cartan's polar decomposition (cf.
  • Parallel Spinors and Connections with Skew-Symmetric Torsion in String Theory*

    Parallel Spinors and Connections with Skew-Symmetric Torsion in String Theory*

    ASIAN J. MATH. © 2002 International Press Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 303-336, June 2002 005 PARALLEL SPINORS AND CONNECTIONS WITH SKEW-SYMMETRIC TORSION IN STRING THEORY* THOMAS FRIEDRICHt AND STEFAN IVANOV* Abstract. We describe all almost contact metric, almost hermitian and G2-structures admitting a connection with totally skew-symmetric torsion tensor, and prove that there exists at most one such connection. We investigate its torsion form, its Ricci tensor, the Dirac operator and the V- parallel spinors. In particular, we obtain partial solutions of the type // string equations in dimension n = 5, 6 and 7. 1. Introduction. Linear connections preserving a Riemannian metric with totally skew-symmetric torsion recently became a subject of interest in theoretical and mathematical physics. For example, the target space of supersymmetric sigma models with Wess-Zumino term carries a geometry of a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion [23, 34, 35] (see also [42] and references therein). In supergravity theories, the geometry of the moduli space of a class of black holes is carried out by a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion [27]. The geometry of NS-5 brane solutions of type II supergravity theories is generated by a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion [44, 45, 43]. The existence of parallel spinors with respect to a metric connection with skew-symmetric torsion on a Riemannian spin manifold is of importance in string theory, since they are associated with some string solitons (BPS solitons) [43]. Supergravity solutions that preserve some of the supersymmetry of the underlying theory have found many applications in the exploration of perturbative and non-perturbative properties of string theory.
  • Tensor Calculus and Differential Geometry

    Tensor Calculus and Differential Geometry

    Course Notes Tensor Calculus and Differential Geometry 2WAH0 Luc Florack March 10, 2021 Cover illustration: papyrus fragment from Euclid’s Elements of Geometry, Book II [8]. Contents Preface iii Notation 1 1 Prerequisites from Linear Algebra 3 2 Tensor Calculus 7 2.1 Vector Spaces and Bases . .7 2.2 Dual Vector Spaces and Dual Bases . .8 2.3 The Kronecker Tensor . 10 2.4 Inner Products . 11 2.5 Reciprocal Bases . 14 2.6 Bases, Dual Bases, Reciprocal Bases: Mutual Relations . 16 2.7 Examples of Vectors and Covectors . 17 2.8 Tensors . 18 2.8.1 Tensors in all Generality . 18 2.8.2 Tensors Subject to Symmetries . 22 2.8.3 Symmetry and Antisymmetry Preserving Product Operators . 24 2.8.4 Vector Spaces with an Oriented Volume . 31 2.8.5 Tensors on an Inner Product Space . 34 2.8.6 Tensor Transformations . 36 2.8.6.1 “Absolute Tensors” . 37 CONTENTS i 2.8.6.2 “Relative Tensors” . 38 2.8.6.3 “Pseudo Tensors” . 41 2.8.7 Contractions . 43 2.9 The Hodge Star Operator . 43 3 Differential Geometry 47 3.1 Euclidean Space: Cartesian and Curvilinear Coordinates . 47 3.2 Differentiable Manifolds . 48 3.3 Tangent Vectors . 49 3.4 Tangent and Cotangent Bundle . 50 3.5 Exterior Derivative . 51 3.6 Affine Connection . 52 3.7 Lie Derivative . 55 3.8 Torsion . 55 3.9 Levi-Civita Connection . 56 3.10 Geodesics . 57 3.11 Curvature . 58 3.12 Push-Forward and Pull-Back . 59 3.13 Examples . 60 3.13.1 Polar Coordinates in the Euclidean Plane .
  • The Language of Differential Forms

    The Language of Differential Forms

    Appendix A The Language of Differential Forms This appendix—with the only exception of Sect.A.4.2—does not contain any new physical notions with respect to the previous chapters, but has the purpose of deriving and rewriting some of the previous results using a different language: the language of the so-called differential (or exterior) forms. Thanks to this language we can rewrite all equations in a more compact form, where all tensor indices referred to the diffeomorphisms of the curved space–time are “hidden” inside the variables, with great formal simplifications and benefits (especially in the context of the variational computations). The matter of this appendix is not intended to provide a complete nor a rigorous introduction to this formalism: it should be regarded only as a first, intuitive and oper- ational approach to the calculus of differential forms (also called exterior calculus, or “Cartan calculus”). The main purpose is to quickly put the reader in the position of understanding, and also independently performing, various computations typical of a geometric model of gravity. The readers interested in a more rigorous discussion of differential forms are referred, for instance, to the book [22] of the bibliography. Let us finally notice that in this appendix we will follow the conventions introduced in Chap. 12, Sect. 12.1: latin letters a, b, c,...will denote Lorentz indices in the flat tangent space, Greek letters μ, ν, α,... tensor indices in the curved manifold. For the matter fields we will always use natural units = c = 1. Also, unless otherwise stated, in the first three Sects.
  • Hodge Theory of SKT Manifolds

    Hodge Theory of SKT Manifolds

    Hodge theory and deformations of SKT manifolds Gil R. Cavalcanti∗ Department of Mathematics Utrecht University Abstract We use tools from generalized complex geometry to develop the theory of SKT (a.k.a. pluriclosed Hermitian) manifolds and more generally manifolds with special holonomy with respect to a metric connection with closed skew-symmetric torsion. We develop Hodge theory on such manifolds show- ing how the reduction of the holonomy group causes a decomposition of the twisted cohomology. For SKT manifolds this decomposition is accompanied by an identity between different Laplacian operators and forces the collapse of a spectral sequence at the first page. Further we study the de- formation theory of SKT structures, identifying the space where the obstructions live. We illustrate our theory with examples based on Calabi{Eckmann manifolds, instantons, Hopf surfaces and Lie groups. Contents 1 Linear algebra 3 2 Intrinsic torsion of generalized Hermitian structures8 2.1 The Nijenhuis tensor....................................9 2.2 The intrinsic torsion and the road to integrability.................... 10 2.3 The operators δ± and δ± ................................. 12 3 Parallel Hermitian and bi-Hermitian structures 12 4 SKT structures 14 5 Hodge theory 19 5.1 Differential operators, their adjoints and Laplacians.................. 19 5.2 Signature and Euler characteristic of almost Hermitian manifolds........... 20 5.3 Hodge theory on parallel Hermitian manifolds...................... 22 5.4 Hodge theory on SKT manifolds............................. 23 5.5 Relation to Dolbeault cohomology............................ 23 5.6 Hermitian symplectic structures.............................. 27 6 Hodge theory beyond U(n) 28 6.1 Integrability......................................... 29 Keywords. Strong KT structure, generalized complex geometry, generalized K¨ahlergeometry, Hodge theory, instan- tons, deformations.
  • Linearization Via the Lie Derivative ∗

    Linearization Via the Lie Derivative ∗

    Electron. J. Diff. Eqns., Monograph 02, 2000 http://ejde.math.swt.edu or http://ejde.math.unt.edu ftp ejde.math.swt.edu or ejde.math.unt.edu (login: ftp) Linearization via the Lie Derivative ∗ Carmen Chicone & Richard Swanson Abstract The standard proof of the Grobman–Hartman linearization theorem for a flow at a hyperbolic rest point proceeds by first establishing the analogous result for hyperbolic fixed points of local diffeomorphisms. In this exposition we present a simple direct proof that avoids the discrete case altogether. We give new proofs for Hartman’s smoothness results: A 2 flow is 1 linearizable at a hyperbolic sink, and a 2 flow in the C C C plane is 1 linearizable at a hyperbolic rest point. Also, we formulate C and prove some new results on smooth linearization for special classes of quasi-linear vector fields where either the nonlinear part is restricted or additional conditions on the spectrum of the linear part (not related to resonance conditions) are imposed. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Continuous Conjugacy 4 3 Smooth Conjugacy 7 3.1 Hyperbolic Sinks . 10 3.1.1 Smooth Linearization on the Line . 32 3.2 Hyperbolic Saddles . 34 4 Linearization of Special Vector Fields 45 4.1 Special Vector Fields . 46 4.2 Saddles . 50 4.3 Infinitesimal Conjugacy and Fiber Contractions . 50 4.4 Sources and Sinks . 51 ∗Mathematics Subject Classifications: 34-02, 34C20, 37D05, 37G10. Key words: Smooth linearization, Lie derivative, Hartman, Grobman, hyperbolic rest point, fiber contraction, Dorroh smoothing. c 2000 Southwest Texas State University. Submitted November 14, 2000.
  • Hamilton's Ricci Flow

    Hamilton's Ricci Flow

    The University of Melbourne, Department of Mathematics and Statistics Hamilton's Ricci Flow Nick Sheridan Supervisor: Associate Professor Craig Hodgson Second Reader: Professor Hyam Rubinstein Honours Thesis, November 2006. Abstract The aim of this project is to introduce the basics of Hamilton's Ricci Flow. The Ricci flow is a pde for evolving the metric tensor in a Riemannian manifold to make it \rounder", in the hope that one may draw topological conclusions from the existence of such \round" metrics. Indeed, the Ricci flow has recently been used to prove two very deep theorems in topology, namely the Geometrization and Poincar´eConjectures. We begin with a brief survey of the differential geometry that is needed in the Ricci flow, then proceed to introduce its basic properties and the basic techniques used to understand it, for example, proving existence and uniqueness and bounds on derivatives of curvature under the Ricci flow using the maximum principle. We use these results to prove the \original" Ricci flow theorem { the 1982 theorem of Richard Hamilton that closed 3-manifolds which admit metrics of strictly positive Ricci curvature are diffeomorphic to quotients of the round 3-sphere by finite groups of isometries acting freely. We conclude with a qualitative discussion of the ideas behind the proof of the Geometrization Conjecture using the Ricci flow. Most of the project is based on the book by Chow and Knopf [6], the notes by Peter Topping [28] (which have recently been made into a book, see [29]), the papers of Richard Hamilton (in particular [9]) and the lecture course on Geometric Evolution Equations presented by Ben Andrews at the 2006 ICE-EM Graduate School held at the University of Queensland.
  • On Lie Derivation of Spinors Against Arbitrary Tangent Vector Fields

    On Lie Derivation of Spinors Against Arbitrary Tangent Vector Fields

    On Lie derivation of spinors against arbitrary tangent vector fields Andras´ LASZL´ O´ [email protected] Wigner RCP, Budapest, Hungary (joint work with L.Andersson and I.Rácz) CERS8 Workshop Brno, 17th February 2018 On Lie derivation of spinors against arbitrary tangent vector fields – p. 1 Preliminaries Ordinary Lie derivation. Take a one-parameter group (φt)t∈R of diffeomorphisms over a manifold M. Lie derivation against that is defined on the smooth sections χ of the mixed tensor algebra of T (M) and T ∗(M), with the formula: L φ∗ χ := ∂t φ∗ −t χ t=0 It has explicit formula: on T (M) : Lu(χ)=[u,χ] , a on F (M) := M× R : Lu(χ)= u da (χ) , ∗ a a on T (M) : Lu(χ)= u da (χ) + d(u χa), where u is the unique tangent vector field underlying (φt)t∈R. The map u 7→ Lu is faithful Lie algebra representation. On Lie derivation of spinors against arbitrary tangent vector fields – p. 2 Lie derivation on a vector bundle. Take a vector bundle V (M) over M. Take a one-parameter group of diffeomorphisms of the total space of V (M), which preserves the vector bundle structure. The ∂t() against the flows of these are vector bundle Lie derivations. t=0 (I.Kolár,P.Michor,K.Slovák:ˇ Natural operations in differential geometry; Springer 1993) Explicit expression: take a preferred covariant derivation ∇, then over the sections χ of V (M) one can express these as ∇ A a A A B L χ = u ∇a χ − CB χ (u,C) That is: Lie derivations on a vector bundle are uniquely characterized by their horizontal a A part u ∇a and vertical part CB .
  • Geometric Algebra for Physicists

    Geometric Algebra for Physicists

    GEOMETRIC ALGEBRA FOR PHYSICISTS CHRIS DORAN and ANTHONY LASENBY University of Cambridge published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, NewYork, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarc´on 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press, 2003 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2003 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeface CMR 10/13 pt System LATEX2ε [TB] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication data ISBN 0 521 48022 1 hardback Contents Preface ix Notation xiii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Vector (linear) spaces 2 1.2 The scalar product 4 1.3 Complex numbers 6 1.4 Quaternions 7 1.5 The cross product 10 1.6 The outer product 11 1.7 Notes 17 1.8 Exercises 18 2 Geometric algebra in two and three dimensions 20 2.1 A new product for vectors 21 2.2 An outline of geometric algebra 23 2.3 Geometric algebra of the plane 24 2.4 The geometric algebra of space 29 2.5 Conventions 38 2.6 Reflections 40 2.7 Rotations 43 2.8 Notes 51 2.9