DOCSLIB.ORG

Republic of Korea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

OCONUS Compliance Assessment Protocols Republic of Korea September 1998 DRAFT FOREWORD This is the first draft version of a compliance assessment manual for use by the Department of Defense components in the Republic of Korea. It is based on the United States Forces, Korea, Environmental Governing Standards (USFK EGS), 15 July 1997. The research was performed for the Headquarters, Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence (HQ AFCEE), under Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR) number FQ7624-98-08031, dated 05 February 1998. The HQ AFCEE technical monitor was Mr. Scott Newquist, HQ AFCEE/EQP and for the United States Army Environmental Center (USAEC), under MIPR number 8234, dated 25 February 1998. The HQ AFCEE technical monitor was Mr. Scott Newquist, HQ AFCEE/EQP; the USAEC technical monitor was Mr. Matthew Andrews, SFIM-AEC-EQS. The research was performed by the Planning and Management Laboratory, Environmental Processes Division (PL- N), of the U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (USACERL). The Principal Investigator was Dr. David A. Krooks, PL-N. L. Jerome Benson is Acting Division Chief, PL-N. L. Michael Golish is Operations Chief, PL. COL James A. Walter is Commander, and Dr. Michael J. O’Connor is Director of USACERL. i NOTICE This manual is intended as general guidance for personnel at Department of Defense (DOD) facilities. It is not, nor is it intended to be, a complete treatise on environmental laws and regulations. Neither the United States Gov- ernment nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained herein. For any specific questions about, or interpretations of, the legal references herein, consult appropriate counsel. ii MANUAL OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION The OCONUS Compliance Assessment Protocols (OCAP) for the Republic of Korea provides checklists to be used during a Department of Defense (DOD) environment compliance assessment in that country. This manual and the appropriate service-specific supplement together serve as primary auditing tools. Specifically, OCAP-ROK is based on the Environmental Governing Standards (USFK EGS), July 1997, and other relevant and OCONUS-applicable DOD documents. The manual is divided into 13 sections, which contain the specific environmental compliance guidelines and checklists for each of the 13 compliance categories: Air Emissions Management Cultural Resources Management Hazardous Materials Management Hazardous Waste Management Natural Resources Management Other Environmental Issues Pesticide Management Petroleum, Oil, and Lubricant (POL) Management Solid Waste Management Storage Tank Management Toxic Substances Management Wastewater Management Water Quality Management. iii iv Glossary of Acronyms Acronym Expansion ACofS Assistant Chief of Staff ACM asbestos-containing material ACWM asbestos-containing waste material AFPMB Armed Forces Pest Management Board API American Petroleum Institute AST aboveground storage tank ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials BOD biochemical oxygen demand CAS Chemical Abstract Service CATEX categorical exclusion CBOD carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand CFC chlorofluorocarbon CFR Code of Federal Regulations CONUS continental United States CT concentration/time CWS community water system CX categorical exclusion DOD Department of Defense DODAAC DOD Activity Address Code DODD DOD Directive DODI DOD Instruction DOE Department of Energy DOT Department of Transportation DRMO Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office DRMS Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service DWTP domestic wastewater treatment plant EA environmental analysis EA environmental assessment EA Executive Agent EC Emergency Coordinator EGS Environmental Governing Standards EIS Environmental Impact Statement EM Environmental Manager ER environmental review v Acronym Expansion ES environmental study GOCO government-owned contractor-operated GSA General Services Administration GWUDISW groundwater under the direct influence of surface water HCFC hydrochlorofluorocarbon HM hazardous materials HMIS Hazardous Materials Information System HW hazardous waste HWAP hazardous waste accumulation point HWPS hazardous waste profile sheet HWSA hazardous waste storage area IAPMO International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials IC Installation Commander IOSC Installation On-Scene Coordinator IRT Installation Response Team ITP industrial toxic project IWTP industrial wastewater treatment plant MCL maximum contamination level MIPR military interdepartmental purchase request MP Management Practice MSDS material safety data sheet MSHA Mine Safety and Health Administration MSW municipal solid waste MSWLF municipal solid waste landfill NACE National Association of Corrosion Engineers NFPA National Fire Protection Association NLR noise level reduction NPS nonpoint (or nonstationary) source NPWS nonpublic water system NTNCWS nontransient, noncommunity water system O&M Operations and Maintenance OCONUS Outside of the Continental United States ODC ozone-depleting chemical ODS ozone-depleting substance OEBGD Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document vi Acronym Expansion PCB polychlorinated biphenyl PEL permissible exposure limit PMC Pest Management Consultant POC point-of-contact POE point-of-entry POL petroleum, oil, and lubricant POTW publicly owned treatment works POU point of use PPE personal protective equipment PWS public water system QA/QC quality assurance/quality control QC&I quality control and inspection RDF refuse derived fuel RQ reportable quantity SEL sound exposure level SF standard form SOFA Status of Forces Agreement TNCWS transient, noncommunity water system TSDF treatment, storage, and disposal facility TSS total suspended solids TTHM total trihalomethanes UIC unit identification code ULV ultra-low volume UPC Uniform Plumbing Code USACERL U.S. Army Construction Engineering Research Laboratories USC U.S. Code USEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency UST underground storage tank VOC volatile organic compound VOL volatile organic liquid WQP water quality parameter WWTP wastewater treatment plant vii viii SECTION 1 AIR EMISSIONS MANAGEMENT Korea Protocols Draft - September 1998 A. Applicability of this Section This sections contains criteria for air emissions and performance standards applied to Department of Defense (DOD) owned and operated equipment in the Republic of Korea (ROK). The performance standards cover fossil-fuel-fired steam generators, hot-water generating plants, electric utility steam generators, and incinerators. These standards include monitoring, data collection and record keeping requirements. Motor vehicles and volatile organic com- pounds (VOCs) are also addressed. This section also contains provisions for fire protection training. However, crite- ria addressing open burning of solid waste are contained in Section 9, Solid Waste Management; ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) are addressed in the pollution prevention checklists in Section 6, Other Environmental Issues. B. Source Documents • United States Forces, Korea Environmental Governing Standards (USFK EGS), 15 July 1997, Chapter 2. C. Key Compliance Requirements • New or substantially modified fossil-fuel-fired steam-generating units rated greater than 100 MBtu/h heat input must meet specific emissions limitations for particulate matter and SO2, Nox, and fuel sulfur content. • New or substantially modified steam-generating units and electric utility steam-generating units rated greater than 100 MBtu/h heat input must operate a properly calibrated and maintained continuous emissions monitoring system for opacity, NOx, and the O2 or CO2 content of flue gases. • New or substantially modified electric utility steam-generating units rated greater than 100 MBtu/h heat input must meet specific emissions limitations. • Existing and new or substantially modified steam generating units and electric utility steam generating units rated greater than 100,000 Btu/h [29 kW] but less than 100 MBtu/h heat input must have an annual tune-up so that spe- cific operational requirements are met. • All new or substantially modified steam generating units and electric utility steam generating units rated less than 100,000 Btu/h [29 kW] heat input must meet specific requirements for emissions and monitoring. • New or substantially modified incinerators that burn more than 50 tons/day or that burn more than 10 percent sewage sludge must meet specific emissions limitations. • Medical waste incinerators rated at 300 lb/h [≅ 136 kg/h] must meet specific limitations for gaseous pollutants. • Open burning is permitted only for fire fighting and infrequent vegetative debris management. • Installations must maintain USFK-owned, nontactical vehicles and USFK-registered privately owned vehicles so as to prevent excessive emissions. • Vapor degreasers in use after 30 September 1996 must incorporate systems that minimize the direct release of VOCs to the atmosphere. 1-1 Air Emissions D. Definitions • Air Pollutants - gases and particulate matter that increase environmental or health risk or offensive odor upon emission into the air (see Appendix 1-1) (USFK EGS 2.2). • Automobile Emissions Standards - these concern the following substances discharged from automobiles: CO, HC, smoke (USFK EGS 2.2) • British Thermal Unit (Btu) - the quantity of heat required to raise the temperature of 1 lb of water by 1 oF (USFK EGS
Recommended publications
  • Restricted Use Product Summary Report

    Restricted Use Product Summary Report

    Page 1 of 17 Restricted Use Product Summary Report (January 19, 2016) Percent Active Registration # Name Company # Company Name Active Ingredient(s) Ingredient 4‐152 BONIDE ORCHARD MOUSE BAIT 4 BONIDE PRODUCTS, INC. 2 Zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) 70‐223 RIGO EXOTHERM TERMIL 70 VALUE GARDENS SUPPLY, LLC 20 Chlorothalonil 100‐497 AATREX 4L HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 42.6 Atrazine 100‐585 AATREX NINE‐O HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 88.2 Atrazine 100‐669 CURACRON 8E INSECTICIDE‐MITICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 73 Profenofos 100‐817 BICEP II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐827 BICEP LITE II MAGNUM HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 28.1; 35.8 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐886 BICEP MAGNUM 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 33.7; 26.1 Atrazine; S‐Metolachlor 100‐898 AGRI‐MEK 0.15 EC MITICIDE/INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2 Abamectin 100‐903 DENIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 2.15 Emamectin benzoate 100‐904 PROCLAIM INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 5 Emamectin benzoate 100‐998 KARATE 1EC 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1075 FORCE 3G INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 3 Tefluthrin Acetochlor; Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl‐ 100‐1083 DOUBLEPLAY SELECTIVE HERBICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 16.9; 67.8 , S‐ethyl ester 100‐1086 KARATE EC‐W INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, LLC 13.1 lambda‐Cyhalothrin 100‐1088 SCIMITAR GC INSECTICIDE 100 SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION,
  • Cypermethrin

    Cypermethrin

    International Environmental Health Criteria 82 Cypermethrin Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION GENEVA 1989 Other titles available in the ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA series include: 1. Mercury 2. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Terphenyls 3. Lead 4. Oxides of Nitrogen 5. Nitrates, Nitrites, and N-Nitroso Compounds 6. Principles and Methods for Evaluating the Toxicity of Chemicals, Part 1 7. Photochemical Oxidants 8. Sulfur Oxides and Suspended Particulate Matter 9. DDT and its Derivatives 10. Carbon Disulfide 11. Mycotoxins 12. Noise 13. Carbon Monoxide 14. Ultraviolet Radiation 15. Tin and Organotin Compounds 16. Radiofrequency and Microwaves 17. Manganese 18. Arsenic 19. Hydrogen Sulfide 20. Selected Petroleum Products 21. Chlorine and Hydrogen Chloride 22. Ultrasound 23. Lasers and Optical Radiation 24. Titanium 25. Selected Radionuclides 26. Styrene 27. Guidelines on Studies in Environmental Epidemiology 28. Acrylonitrile 29. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid (2,4-D) 30. Principles for Evaluating Health Risks to Progeny Associated with Exposure to Chemicals during Pregnancy 31. Tetrachloroethylene 32. Methylene Chloride 33. Epichlorohydrin 34. Chlordane 35. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Fields 36. Fluorine and Fluorides 37. Aquatic (Marine and Freshwater) Biotoxins 38. Heptachlor 39. Paraquat and Diquat 40. Endosulfan 41. Quintozene 42. Tecnazene 43. Chlordecone 44. Mirex continued on p. 156
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts

    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
  • Biolphilately Vol-64 No-3

    Biolphilately Vol-64 No-3

    BIOPHILATELY OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE BIOLOGY UNIT OF ATA MARCH 2020 VOLUME 69, NUMBER 1 Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em, And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum. —Augustus De Morgan Dr. Indraneil Das Pangolins on Stamps More Inside >> IN THIS ISSUE NEW ISSUES: ARTICLES & ILLUSTRATIONS: From the Editor’s Desk ......................... 1 Botany – Christopher E. Dahle ............ 17 Pangolins on Stamps of the President’s Message .............................. 2 Fungi – Paul A. Mistretta .................... 28 World – Dr. Indraneil Das ..................7 Secretary -Treasurer’s Corner ................ 3 Mammalia – Michael Prince ................ 31 Squeaky Curtain – Frank Jacobs .......... 15 New Members ....................................... 3 Ornithology – Glenn G. Mertz ............. 35 New Plants in the Philatelic News of Note ......................................... 3 Ichthyology – J. Dale Shively .............. 57 Herbarium – Christopher Dahle ....... 23 Women’s Suffrage – Dawn Hamman .... 4 Entomology – Donald Wright, Jr. ........ 59 Rats! ..................................................... 34 Event Calendar ...................................... 6 Paleontology – Michael Kogan ........... 65 New Birds in the Philatelic Wedding Set ........................................ 16 Aviary – Charles E. Braun ............... 51 Glossary ............................................... 72 Biology Reference Websites ................ 69 ii Biophilately March 2020 Vol. 69 (1) BIOPHILATELY BIOLOGY UNIT
  • Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries

    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries

    Historical Perspectives on Apple Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Insecticidal Chemistries. Peter Jentsch Extension Associate Department of Entomology Cornell University's Hudson Valley Lab 3357 Rt. 9W; PO box 727 Highland, NY 12528 email: [email protected] Phone 845-691-7151 Mobile: 845-417-7465 http://www.nysaes.cornell.edu/ent/faculty/jentsch/ 2 Historical Perspectives on Fruit Production: Fruit Tree Pest Management, Regulation and New Chemistries. by Peter Jentsch I. Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 Synthetic Pesticide Development and Use II. Influences Changing the Pest Management Profile in Apple Production Chemical Residues in Early Insect Management Historical Chemical Regulation Recent Regulation Developments Changing Pest Management Food Quality Protection Act of 1996 The Science Behind The Methodology Pesticide Revisions – Requirements For New Registrations III. Resistance of Insect Pests to Insecticides Resistance Pest Management Strategies IV. Reduced Risk Chemistries: New Modes of Action and the Insecticide Treadmill Fermentation Microbial Products Bt’s, Abamectins, Spinosads Juvenile Hormone Analogs Formamidines, Juvenile Hormone Analogs And Mimics Insect Growth Regulators Azadirachtin, Thiadiazine Neonicotinyls Major Reduced Risk Materials: Carboxamides, Carboxylic Acid Esters, Granulosis Viruses, Diphenyloxazolines, Insecticidal Soaps, Benzoyl Urea Growth Regulators, Tetronic Acids, Oxadiazenes , Particle Films, Phenoxypyrazoles, Pyridazinones, Spinosads, Tetrazines , Organotins, Quinolines. 3 I Historical Use of Pesticides in Apple Production Overview of Apple Production and Pest Management Prior to 1940 The apple has a rather ominous origin. Its inception is framed in the biblical text regarding the genesis of mankind. The backdrop appears to be the turbulent setting of what many scholars believe to be present day Iraq.
  • Impact of Pesticide Use on Health in Developing Countries

    Impact of Pesticide Use on Health in Developing Countries

    Impact of pesticide use on health in developing countries Proceedings of a symposium held in Ottawa, Canada, 1 7-20 September 1990 IDRC CRDI International Development Research Centre Centre de recherches pour le devetoppement international 1 March 1993 Dear Reader/Librarian, IDRC is a public corporation created by the Canadian parliament in 1970 to help developing countries find viable solutions to their problems through research. At the 1992 Earth Summit, IDRC's mandate was broadened to emphasize sustainable development issues. As part of IDRC's strengthened commitment to global action and harüony, we are pleased to send you a complimentary copy of our most recent publication: The impact of pesticide use on health in developing countries (March 1993, 352 pages, 0-88936-560-1, $17.95). The first part of this book presents a brief survey of the global situation and the results of twelve epidemiological studies carried out by researchers from Africa, Latin America, Asia and the Middle East. These focus on poisonings resulting from organophosphates, herbicides, and pyrethroids. The second part illustrates the role of the process of development, production, spraying techniques and legislation in protecting the health of workers. A discussion of the benefits and modalities of access to pertinent information for the prevention of pesticide poisonings is provided in the third section. Finally, in the fourth section, consideration is given to the advantages and disadvantages of certain alternatives to the use of synthetic pesticides in agriculture and public health, such as botanical pesticides and integrated pest management strategies. We hope this book is a valuable addition to your collection.
  • Follow-Up Studies After Withdrawal of Deltamethrin Spraying Against Anopheles Culicifacies and Malaria Incidence

    Follow-Up Studies After Withdrawal of Deltamethrin Spraying Against Anopheles Culicifacies and Malaria Incidence

    Journal of the American Mosquito contror Association, 2o(4):424-42g,2004 Copyright @ 2OO4 by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc. FOLLOW-UP STUDIES AFTER WITHDRAWAL OF DELTAMETHRIN SPRAYING AGAINST ANOPHELES CULICIFACIES AND MALARIA INCIDENCE MUSHARRAF ALI ANSARI eNo RAMA KRISHNA RAZDAN Malaria Research Centre (ICMR), 2}-Madhuban, Delhi_ll0 092, India ABSTRACT. Follow-up studies were carried out from 1989 to 1998 after withdrawal of deltamethrin indoor spraying to evaluate the-recovery rate of a population of Anopheles culicifacies resistant to dichlorodiphenyltri- chloroethane (DDT) and hexachlorocyclohexane (HCH) in selected villages in Uttar pradesh State, I;dia. The study revealed 82.4-96.5Ea reduction in adult density of An. culicifacies and 72.7-967o reduction in malaria incidence in the area sprayed with deltamethrin at 20 mg/m, as compared to a control area sprayed with HCH, for 5 successive years even after withdrawal of deltamethrin spray. The impact was very clear when the annual falciparum incidence was compared with that of the control area. The vector population gradually started re- covering after 5 years. However, the slide falciparum rate remained below 4 even after 10 years of withdrawal of spraying. The study revealed that indoor residual spraying of deltamethrin would be cost-effective, at least in areas where malaria is transmitted by An. culicifacies, which is primarily a zoophilic species and associated with malaria epidemics. In view of this, a review of the insecticide policy and strategy of vector control is urgently needed because of the possible risks associated with the presence of nonbiodegradable insecticide in the environment, as well as to minimize the costs of operation and to enhance the useful life of insecticides.
  • Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska

    Introduction to Common Native & Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska

    Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska Cover photographs by (top to bottom, left to right): Tara Chestnut/Hannah E. Anderson, Jamie Fenneman, Vanessa Morgan, Dana Visalli, Jamie Fenneman, Lynda K. Moore and Denny Lassuy. Introduction to Common Native & Potential Invasive Freshwater Plants in Alaska This document is based on An Aquatic Plant Identification Manual for Washington’s Freshwater Plants, which was modified with permission from the Washington State Department of Ecology, by the Center for Lakes and Reservoirs at Portland State University for Alaska Department of Fish and Game US Fish & Wildlife Service - Coastal Program US Fish & Wildlife Service - Aquatic Invasive Species Program December 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments ............................................................................ x Introduction Overview ............................................................................. xvi How to Use This Manual .................................................... xvi Categories of Special Interest Imperiled, Rare and Uncommon Aquatic Species ..................... xx Indigenous Peoples Use of Aquatic Plants .............................. xxi Invasive Aquatic Plants Impacts ................................................................................. xxi Vectors ................................................................................. xxii Prevention Tips .................................................... xxii Early Detection and Reporting
  • Pharmacokinetics of Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Target and Non-Target Organisms Katherine Horak U.S

    Pharmacokinetics of Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Target and Non-Target Organisms Katherine Horak U.S

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Publications Health Inspection Service 2018 Pharmacokinetics of Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Target and Non-target Organisms Katherine Horak U.S. Department of Agriculture, [email protected] Penny M. Fisher Landcare Research Brian M. Hopkins Landcare Research Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Part of the Life Sciences Commons Horak, Katherine; Fisher, Penny M.; and Hopkins, Brian M., "Pharmacokinetics of Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Target and Non- target Organisms" (2018). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 2091. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/2091 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Chapter 4 Pharmacokinetics of Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Target and Non-target Organisms Katherine E. Horak, Penny M. Fisher, and Brian Hopkins 1 Introduction The concentration of a compound at the site of action is a determinant of its toxicity. This principle is affected by a variety of factors including the chemical properties of the compound (pKa, lipophilicity, molecular size), receptor binding affinity, route of exposure, and physiological properties of the organism. Many compounds have to undergo chemical changes, biotransformation, into more toxic or less toxic forms. Because of all of these variables, predicting toxic effects and performing risk assess- ments of compounds based solely on dose are less accurate than those that include data on absorption, distribution, metabolism (biotransformation), and excretion of the compound.
  • These De Doctorat De L'universite Paris-Saclay

    These De Doctorat De L'universite Paris-Saclay

    NNT : 2016SACLS250 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de doctorat (Biologie) Par Mlle Nour Abdel Samad Titre de la thèse (CARACTERISATION GENETIQUE DU GENRE IRIS EVOLUANT DANS LA MEDITERRANEE ORIENTALE) Thèse présentée et soutenue à « Beyrouth », le « 21/09/2016 » : Composition du Jury : M., Tohmé, Georges CNRS (Liban) Président Mme, Garnatje, Teresa Institut Botànic de Barcelona (Espagne) Rapporteur M., Bacchetta, Gianluigi Università degli Studi di Cagliari (Italie) Rapporteur Mme, Nadot, Sophie Université Paris-Sud (France) Examinateur Mlle, El Chamy, Laure Université Saint-Joseph (Liban) Examinateur Mme, Siljak-Yakovlev, Sonja Université Paris-Sud (France) Directeur de thèse Mme, Bou Dagher-Kharrat, Magda Université Saint-Joseph (Liban) Co-directeur de thèse UNIVERSITE SAINT-JOSEPH FACULTE DES SCIENCES THESE DE DOCTORAT DISCIPLINE : Sciences de la vie SPÉCIALITÉ : Biologie de la conservation Sujet de la thèse : Caractérisation génétique du genre Iris évoluant dans la Méditerranée Orientale. Présentée par : Nour ABDEL SAMAD Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR ÈS SCIENCES Soutenue le 21/09/2016 Devant le jury composé de : Dr. Georges TOHME Président Dr. Teresa GARNATJE Rapporteur Dr. Gianluigi BACCHETTA Rapporteur Dr. Sophie NADOT Examinateur Dr. Laure EL CHAMY Examinateur Dr. Sonja SILJAK-YAKOVLEV Directeur de thèse Dr. Magda BOU DAGHER KHARRAT Directeur de thèse Titre : Caractérisation Génétique du Genre Iris évoluant dans la Méditerranée Orientale. Mots clés : Iris, Oncocyclus, région Est-Méditerranéenne, relations phylogénétiques, status taxonomique. Résumé : Le genre Iris appartient à la famille des L’approche scientifique est basée sur de nombreux Iridacées, il comprend plus de 280 espèces distribuées outils moléculaires et génétiques tels que : l’analyse de à travers l’hémisphère Nord.
  • The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances)

    The List of Extremely Hazardous Substances)

    APPENDIX A (THE LIST OF EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES) THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 75-86-5 ACETONE CYANOHYDRIN 500 10 1752-30-3 ACETONE THIOSEMICARBAZIDE 500/500 1,000 107-02-8 ACROLEIN 500 1 79-06-1 ACRYLAMIDE 500/500 5,000 107-13-1 ACRYLONITRILE 500 100 814-68-6 ACRYLYL CHLORIDE 100 100 111-69-3 ADIPONITRILE 500 1,000 116-06-3 ALDICARB 100/500 1 309-00-2 ALDRIN 500/500 1 107-18-6 ALLYL ALCOHOL 500 100 107-11-9 ALLYLAMINE 500 500 20859-73-8 ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE 500 100 54-62-6 AMINOPTERIN 500/500 500 78-53-5 AMITON 500 500 3734-97-2 AMITON OXALATE 100/500 100 7664-41-7 AMMONIA 500 100 300-62-9 AMPHETAMINE 500 1,000 62-53-3 ANILINE 500 5,000 88-05-1 ANILINE,2,4,6-TRIMETHYL- 500 500 7783-70-2 ANTIMONY PENTAFLUORIDE 500 500 1397-94-0 ANTIMYCIN A 500/500 1,000 86-88-4 ANTU 500/500 100 1303-28-2 ARSENIC PENTOXIDE 100/500 1 THRESHOLD REPORTABLE INVENTORY RELEASE QUANTITY QUANTITY CAS NUMBER CHEMICAL NAME (POUNDS) (POUNDS) 1327-53-3 ARSENOUS OXIDE 100/500 1 7784-34-1 ARSENOUS TRICHLORIDE 500 1 7784-42-1 ARSINE 100 100 2642-71-9 AZINPHOS-ETHYL 100/500 100 86-50-0 AZINPHOS-METHYL 10/500 1 98-87-3 BENZAL CHLORIDE 500 5,000 98-16-8 BENZENAMINE, 3-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)- 500 500 100-14-1 BENZENE, 1-(CHLOROMETHYL)-4-NITRO- 500/500 500 98-05-5 BENZENEARSONIC ACID 10/500 10 3615-21-2 BENZIMIDAZOLE, 4,5-DICHLORO-2-(TRI- 500/500 500 FLUOROMETHYL)- 98-07-7 BENZOTRICHLORIDE 100 10 100-44-7 BENZYL CHLORIDE 500 100 140-29-4 BENZYL CYANIDE 500 500 15271-41-7 BICYCLO[2.2.1]HEPTANE-2-CARBONITRILE,5-
  • [별표 1] 유독물(제2조 관련) 1. 과산화 나트륨 [Sodium Peroxide] 및 이를 함유한 제제

    [별표 1] 유독물(제2조 관련) 1. 과산화 나트륨 [Sodium Peroxide] 및 이를 함유한 제제

    [별표 1] 유독물(제2조 관련) 1. 과산화 나트륨 [Sodium peroxide] 및 이를 함유한 제제. 다만, 이를 5%이하 함유한 것은 제외한다. 2. 과산화 수소 [Hydrogen peroxide] 및 이를 함유한 제제. 다만, 이를 6%이하 함유한 것은 제외한다. 3. 과산화 요소 [Urea peroxide] 및 이를 함유한 제제. 다만, 이를 17%이하 함유한 것은 제외한다. 4. 나트륨 [Sodium] 5. β-나프톨 [β-Naphthol] 및 이를 함유한 제제. 다만, 이를 1%이하 함유한 것은 제외한다. 6. 1-나프틸 메틸카르밤산 [1-Naphthyl methylcarbamate : Carbaryl, Sevin, Arylam] 및 이를 함유한 제제. 다만, 이를 5%이하 함유한 것은 제외한다. 7. α-나프틸 티오우레아 [α-Naphthyl thiourea : ANTU, Bantu, Krysid] 및 이를 함유한 제제 8. 납 화합물 [Lead compound]. 다만, 시산화 심납(Lead tetroxide), 황산 납(Lead sulfate), 염기성 탄산납(Basic lead carbonate)은 제외한다. 9. 니켈 카르보닐 [Nickel carbonyl] 및 이를 함유한 제제 10. 니코틴 [Nicotine]과 그 염류 및 그중 하나를 함유한 제제 11. 니트로벤젠 [Nitrobenzene] 12. 1-(4-니트로페닐)-3-(3-피라딜메틸)우레아 [1-(4-Nitrophenyl)-3-(3-pyridylmethyl)urea : Priminil, Vacor] 및 이를 함유한 제제 13. 2,4-디니트로-6-메틸프로필페닐디메틸 아크릴산 [2,4-Dinitro-6-methyl propylphenyldimethyl acrylate : Binapacryl, Morocide] 및 이를 함유한 제제 14. 4,6-디니트로-o-크레솔 [4,6-Dinitro-o-cresol : DNOC, Antinonnin, Sinox]과 그 염류 및 그중 하나를 함유한 제제 15. 3-(디메톡시포스핀일옥시)-N-메틸이소크로톤아미드 [3-(Dimethoxyphosphinyloxy)-N-methylisocrotonamide : Azodrin, Monocrotophos, Apadrin] 및 이를 함유한 제제 16. O,O-디메틸 O-p-니트로페닐 티오인산 [O,O-Dimethyl O-p-nitrophenyl thiophosphate : Methyl parathion, Metaphos, Metacide] 및 이를 함유한 제제 17. 디메틸 (E)-2-디메틸카르바모일-1-메틸비닐 인산 [Dimethyl (E)-2-dimethylcarbamoyl-1-methylvinyl phosphate : Ektafos, Dicrotophos, Bidrin, Carbicron] 및 이를 함유한 제제 18.