Early Contribution to the Study of Indian Society

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

1 1 DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIETY IN INDIA: AN OVERVIEW Early Contribution to the study of Indian society Content 1.0 Objectives 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Earliest Studies on Indian Society 1.3 Arab Accounts on Indian society 1.4 Early European Traders, Travellers writings on Indian society by the British 1.5 Summary 1.6 Check your Progress 1.7 References 1.8 Questions 1.0 Objectives :– 1. To introduce the nature of writings on early Indian society by traders travelers etc. 2. To discuss the British administrators views on Indian Society. 3. To introduce Orientalists and Indological view on Indian society and to highlight the main drawback of these views. 1.2 Introduction Indian civilization is an ancient one with a very long history but the recorded history of the earliest times is very limited. There are recorded observations on Indian society since the third century BC. These records are by traders, travelers and scholars who came to India in these early times. They were Greeks, Romans, Byzantine Greeks, Jews and Chinese. And from 1000 AD onwards Arabs, Turks, Afghans and Persians came to India from time to time. They observed the life of the people and wrote on what they had seen and heard. The early writings on Indian society were based on these observations. 2 These writings cannot be dismissed as tales of travelers and traders. The writings of Indian Society were based on their first hand contact with the people. They wrote on the social institutions and customs of the people. Therefore, they are a source of information on Indian society in the early times. 1.2 Earliest Studies on Indian Society There have been recorded observations on Indian society since the third century B.C. These early writing on Indian society are useful in our understanding of the past. Since they were based on the observations of the people and by talking to the people, these writing have value as recorded writings on India. The early writings on Indian society are discussed under the following sub heads:- Early studies on Indian society by the Greek ambassador. Early studies on Indian society by travelers, traders and scholars. Early studies on Indian society by the British. 1. Early writing on Indian society by the Greek Ambassador : The Greek ambassador Megasthenes came to India in third century B.C. He spent many years in the court of Chandragupta Mourya from 324 - 300 B.C. Megasthenes was an acute observer, but he was handicapped by his ignorance of the local languages of the people. Megasthenes described Indian society as being divided into seven classes: 1) philosophers, who offer sacrifices and perform other sacred rites; 2) husbandmen, who form the bulk of the population: 3) shepherds and hunters: 4) those who work at traders and vend wares and are employed in bodily (manual) labour: 5) fighting men: 6) inspectors and 7) counselors and assessors of the king. Megasthenes also noted that each of these seven “classes” were endogamous. No one could change his occupation or profession. However, Megasthenes does not make any mention of the varna theory. Megasthenes wrote on what he had observed during his stay at the court of Chandragupta Maurya. Megasthenes writings do provide us some information on early Indian society, but it provides little information to our understanding stratification systems. 2. Early writings on Indian society by travelers, traders and scholars: There was extensive trade contact between Rome and India much before India was colonized by the British. Travellers and traders came to India and wrote on the life of the people. These early writings are by: Chinese travellers’ writings on Indian society. 3 Arab accounts on Indian society. Early European traders and travellers writings on Indian society. Chinese travellers writings on Indian Society: Chinese came to India between 400 – 411 A.D., Yuan Chwang came between 629 – 644 AD and I.Tsing came between 671 – 695 AD. They observed the people and wrote in detail about the life of the people. 1.3 Arab Accounts on Indian society The earliest Arabic accounts of Indian society describe the division of society into seven classes. Al- Biruni (973 – ca. 1030) appears to have been having some knowledge of Sanskrit sources and write on the four-varna theory of the caste system. In the seventeenth century many translations were made from Sanskrit literature into Persian by Indo-Muslim scholars. Abul Fazl Allami in late sixteenth century provides a description of Akbar’s court, revenue and administrative system. He also wrote the view that the four varnas were produced from the body of Brahma at the creation of the world. He also wrote about the internal division within the four varnas. Abul Fazl Allami made a list of military and revenue obligations of the different social groups. From this it seems that there was awareness that the Hindu social system was operational at the level of the kin based social categories and not at the level of the Varna. Ibn Batnta, an Arab traveller came to India from Morocco in 1333 AD and lived in India till 1347 AD. His narrations contain information on geography and on the daily social and cultural life of the people. These narratives are not based on any historical records, but on what they saw and heard, and observed in the daily lives of the people. 1.4 Early European Traders, Travellers writings on Indian society by the British Among the Europeans who came to India the earliest were the Portuguese travellers, adventurers, merchants, administrators. They landed on the Malabar coast in South India. At that time the population in Malabar consisted of the local Hindu castes, Moplan Muslims, Jews, Syrian Christians and other foreign people. The hierarchical principle of the caste system functioned in its extreme form. The matrilineal system of the Nayars and the practice of polyandry interested the European who began to study the social and cultural life of the people. Portuguese observer Barbasa wrote on the major cultural features of the caste system. He wrote that the Brahmins held a high position at the top of the hierarchy and the untouchables were at the bottom. He described the ideas of pollution and the practice of untouchability. He 4 also described other aspects of the caste system in detail like caste based occupations, caste endogamy, restrictions on commensality, caste norms followed by each caste and the relationship between caste and political organizations. Barbasa’s narration of the caste system is based on what he saw and what he was told. Barbasa knew the local language and was able to converse with the local people. His observations can be regarded as objective in nature. He did not make any remarks on the evils or benefits of the caste system. Jean Tavernier, a French merchant and traveller made six voyages to India and the Middle East between 1631 and 1667. he wrote detailed accounts of his travels and the people he met. He described the different routes he took. He also wrote historical and commercial accounts of his travel in India. Tavernier wrote a history of the reign of Aurangzeb based on his talk with the people. He described the commercial activities. Finally he also wrote on the Hindu beliefs, rituals and customs by conversing with the Brahmins and through observation. Tavernier says that his writings are based on the views of “the most accomplished of their priests”. He writes that they believe there are 72 castes, but these may be reduced to four principal (castes), from which all others derive their origin”. When Europeans came to India, they approached the Brahmins and discussed Hinduism and the caste system with them. Abraham Roger, a Chaplain at the Dutch factory at Pulicat in Madras studied Hinduism from Dutch speaking Brahmin, Padmanubha in the 1630’s Rogers account of Hinduism contains Padmanubha’s Dutch translation of Bhartrihari’s Satakas. Other Europeans traders and travellers have also described Indian caste system. These writings were based on their understanding of Indian society by discussion with the Brahmins. To conclude, we see that the early visitors to Indian society observed the daily life of the people spoke to the local people and wrote what they had observed. These accounts are sketchy, but are useful as they provide an insight into the early Indian society. Early studies on Indian society by the British: With the establishment of the British rule in India in the later eighteenth century, the British officials felt a need for knowledge of the Indian society and customs and practices for administrative purposes. Some British officials also began to study classical languages of India. By 1760 a systematic body of knowledge on Indian society gradually 5 developed. Three dominant view on Indian society was seen emerging by the end of the eighteenth century. These are: British Administrators views on Indian society. Orientalists views on Indian society. Indological views on Indian society. British Administrators views on Indian society: The period 1757 onwards witnessed the beginnings of the administrators studying Indian society. The British officials were required to learn about India and Indian society for administrative purposes. Assessment of land became necessary for revenue collection. The British official who had no knowledge of land ownership patterns and cultivation practices began to study the structure of Indian society. When the East Indian company became established in northern and southern India, knowledge of Indian political history and the internal political structure of Indian states became necessary. Nature of land tenure, documents on revenue collection and records of previous rulers were studied to determine the rights and duties of persons connected with cultivation.
Recommended publications
  • Copyright by Aarti Bhalodia-Dhanani 2012

    Copyright by Aarti Bhalodia-Dhanani 2012

    Copyright by Aarti Bhalodia-Dhanani 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Aarti Bhalodia-Dhanani certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Princes, Diwans and Merchants: Education and Reform in Colonial India Committee: _____________________ Gail Minault, Supervisor _____________________ Cynthia Talbot _____________________ William Roger Louis _____________________ Janet Davis _____________________ Douglas Haynes Princes, Diwans and Merchants: Education and Reform in Colonial India by Aarti Bhalodia-Dhanani, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2012 For my parents Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without help from mentors, friends and family. I want to start by thanking my advisor Gail Minault for providing feedback and encouragement through the research and writing process. Cynthia Talbot’s comments have helped me in presenting my research to a wider audience and polishing my work. Gail Minault, Cynthia Talbot and William Roger Louis have been instrumental in my development as a historian since the earliest days of graduate school. I want to thank Janet Davis and Douglas Haynes for agreeing to serve on my committee. I am especially grateful to Doug Haynes as he has provided valuable feedback and guided my project despite having no affiliation with the University of Texas. I want to thank the History Department at UT-Austin for a graduate fellowship that facilitated by research trips to the United Kingdom and India. The Dora Bonham research and travel grant helped me carry out my pre-dissertation research.
  • Syllabus of Sociology B.A

    Syllabus of Sociology B.A

    Syllabus of Sociology B.A. Part - I Paper I : Elements of Sociology The nature, scope and subject matter of sociology; sociology and social philosophy, sociology and other social sciences, methods of study. Primary concepts: society - animal society and human society; community, association and institution, social group : in- group and out-group, primary group and secondary group; social institutions: marriage; family, religion, polity, economy and education. The concept of 'total environment', geographical environment and its impact on social life, the concept of social ecology - the city and country. The individual and the society: social contract theory, organismic theory, the interdependence between the individual and the society. Social differentiation and stratification, caste and class, status and role; Basic social processes: cooperation, competition and conflict. The concept of culture: tradition, folkways and mores. Book recommended : 1- R.M. MacIver and C.H. Page : Society : An Introductory Analysis; 2- Robert Bierstedt : The Social Order. 3- Kingsley Davis : Human Society 4- P. Gisbert : Fundamentals of Sociology 5- J.P. Gillin and J.L. Gillin : Cultural Sociology 6- T.B. Bottomore : Sociology 7- H.M. Johnson : Sociology 8- Harton and Hunt : Sociology 9- Alex Inkeles : What is sociology? Paper II: Indian Social Institutions : The textual and the field view of Indian society: the significance of the field view; interface between the present and the past. Traditional bases of Indian social system: Varnashram Vyavastha, Purusharthas, Samskaras, the concept of dharma- samanya and vishishtha; the doctrine of karma, karma and rebirth. Caste system: definition and salient characteristics, theories of origin, recent changes in the caste system, factors responsible for changes, emerging pattern of stratification: caste and class.
  • India and the Study of Kinship Terminologies

    India and the Study of Kinship Terminologies

    L’Homme Revue française d’anthropologie 154-155 | avril-septembre 2000 Question de parenté India and the Study of Kinship Terminologies Thomas R. Trautmann Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/lhomme/49 DOI: 10.4000/lhomme.49 ISSN: 1953-8103 Publisher Éditions de l’EHESS Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2000 Number of pages: 559-572 ISBN: 2-7132-1333-9 ISSN: 0439-4216 Electronic reference Thomas R. Trautmann, « India and the Study of Kinship Terminologies », L’Homme [Online], 154-155 | avril-septembre 2000, Online since 18 May 2007, connection on 03 May 2019. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/lhomme/49 ; DOI : 10.4000/lhomme.49 © École des hautes études en sciences sociales India and the Study of Kinship Terminologies Thomas R.Trautmann “KINSHIP” as an anthropological object, and anthropology as the observing sub- ject of kinship, were mutually constituted in the middle of the nineteenth century. The constituting of kinship was not a creation from nothing, like divine creation ; rather, in the manner of human creations, it came about as a gathering together into a new configuration of elements that had previously existed in a dispersed state. From the law, from ethnographies of missionaries, explorers and philosophical trav- ellers, from the Classics and the Bible were drawn a variety of existing concepts – of patriarchy and matriarchy, forbidden degrees of marriage, rules of inheritance, and so forth – as material for the making of the new thing, kinship. The inventors of kinship – Lewis H. Morgan, J. F. McLennan, Henry Maine, Johann J. Bachofen, Numa D. Fustel de Coulanges – were thrown together through the making of this new object, collaborating in its production without really intending to, or even being aware that they were doing so (Trautmann 1987).
  • Development Team

    Development Team

    Paper No. : 10 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Module : 33 D.N. Majumder, V. Elwin, G.S. Ghurye, Irawati Karve Development Team Principal Investigator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Paper Coordinator Prof. Anup Kumar Kapoor Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Vijit Dipani Content Writer Department of Anthropology, University of Delhi Prof. Subir Biswas, Department of Anthropology, West Content Reviewer Bengal State University, Barasat, West Bengal 1 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology D.N. Majumder, V. Elwin, G.S. Ghurye, Irawati Karve Description of Module Subject Name Anthropology Paper Name 10 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Module Name/Title D.N. Majumder, V. Elwin, G.S. Ghurye, Irawati Karve Module Id 33 2 Theories and methods in social and cultural Anthropology Anthropology D.N. Majumder, V. Elwin, G.S. Ghurye, Irawati Karve Contents 1. DHIRENDRA NATH MAJUMDAR (1903-1960) 1.1 Study of Tribal culture 1.2 Rural Studies 2. IRAVATI KARVE (1905 – 1970) 2.1 Study of Kinship system in India 2.2 Dynamics of Group relations in village 2.3 Social Dynamics of a Growing Town 3. VERRIER ELWIN (1902-1964) 3.1 Tribal Study 4. GOVIND SADASHIV GHURYE (1893 – 1984) 4.1 Views about Indian society and culture 4.2 Views about Caste and kinship system in India 4.3 Views about Tribal population Learning Objective: 1. To study the contribution of eminent anthropologists: o Dhirendra Nath Majumdar o Iravati Karve o Verrier Elwin o Govind Sadashiv Ghurye 2. To study the life history of these anthropologists 3.
  • University of Calicut

    University of Calicut

    School of Distance Education UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT School of Distance Education III SEMESTER (2019 Admission onwards) BA SOCIOLOGY CORE PAPER (SGY3 B04) SOCIAL STRATIFICATION AND INEQUALITY MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS (MODULE I & II) 1. …………..means the things are not the same in its appearance or characteristics A. Differentiation B. Variation C. Dissimilarity D. Discrimination 2. ……………means the state of distributing the valued resources, rewards and positions in society A. Unequal B. Peculiar C. Inequality D. Unequality 3. ……………is the ordering of social unity as higher or lower, superior or inferior A. Ranking B. Pyramid C. Discrimination D. Hierarchy 4. What is the dividing of people in a society on the basis of differentiation, inequality and hierarchy A. Social classification B. Social stratification C. Social differentiation D. Hierarchy Social Stratification and Inequality 1 School of Distance Education 5. Who are the prominent sociologists mainly analyzed the functionalist perspective of social stratification? A. Kingsley Davis &Wilbert E Moore B. Ghurye& Thomas Moore C. Max Weber& Karl Marx D. Parson & Coser 6. ……….means the way of perceiving something A. Perspective B. Looking C. Analyzing D. Gazing 7. In which part of the Indian Constitution, special provisions have been made for National Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Anglo Indians A. Part XV B. Part XIV C. Part XIII D. Part XVI 8. Who has the right to decide that who will be included in the list of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes? A. Governor B. Vice-President C. President D. Chief Minister 9. Which article envisages the establishment of the National Commission for Scheduled Castes? A.
  • Course No. 102..Sociology of Family, Marriage and Kinship

    Course No. 102..Sociology of Family, Marriage and Kinship

    Directorate of Distance Education UNIVERSITY OF JAMMU JAMMU STUDY MATERIAL For M.A. SOCIOLOGY (SEMESTER-IST) TITLE : SOCIOLOGY OF FAMILY, KINSHIP AND MARRIAGE SESSION 2020 COURSE No. SOC-C-102 LESSON No. 1-20 Course Co-ordinator : Teacher Incharge : PROF. ABHA CHAUHAN DR. NEHA VIJ H.O.D., Deptt. of Sociology P. G. Sociology University of Jammu. University of Jammu. http:/wwwdistanceeducationju.in Printed and Published on behalf of the Directorate of Distance Education, University of Jammu, Jammu by the Director, DDE University of Jammu, Jammu. 1 SCRIPT WRITERS * Prof. B.K. Nagla * Prof. Madhu Nagla * Prof. J.R. Panda * Prof. Ashish Saxena * Prof. Abha Chauhan * Prof. Vishav Raksha * Prof. Neeru Sharma * Dr. Hema Gandotra * Dr. Neharica Subhash * Dr. Nisha Sharma * Dr. Kuljeet Singh © Directorate of Distance Education, University of Jammu, Jammu 2020 • All rights reserved . No part of this work may be reproduced in any form, by mimeograph or any other means, without permission in writing from the DDE , University of Jammu. • The script writer shall be responsible for the lesson/script submitted to the DDE and any plagiarism shall be his / her entire responsibility. Printed by : Sushil Printers /2020/650 2 Syllabus of Sociology M.A. lst Semester To be held in the year Dec. 2019, 2020 & 2021 (Non-CBCS) Course No. SOC-C-102 Title : Sociology of Family, Kinship and Marriage Credits : 6 Max. Marks : 100 Duration of examination : 2 & 1/2 hrs. (a) Semester examination : 80 (b) Sessional assessment : 20 Objectives : To demonstrate to the students the universally acknowledged social importance of Family and Kinship structure and familiarize them with the rich diversity in the types of networks of relationship created by genealogical links of marriage and other social ties.
  • Rise and Development of Sociology in India

    Rise and Development of Sociology in India

    Rise and Development of Sociology in India Prof. Jhaverbhai Patel1 , Dr. Subhashchandra Pandar2 1,2 Gujarat University, Ahmadabad, India ABSTRACT In India sociology and social anthropology can be traced to the days when the British officials realized its need for smooth administration. The aftermath of 1857 new science had to come to understand the roots of Indian society. It was with the rise of ethnography, anthropology, and sociology which began to provide empirical data of the colonial rule. According to the history Herbat Risely was the pioneer of ethnographic studies in India. By the second half of the 19th century, Indian sociologists have made a prominent contribution to the development of indigenous studies of Indian society. Certain trends of development of sociology may be identified in the pre independence period. But strong scientific empirical tradition had not emerged before independence. Sociology was considered a mixed bag without a proper identity of its own (Rao, 1982). Sociology established its identity as discipline by separating itself from psychology, anthropology and social philosophy in post independence period. Many scholars who richly contributed to the promotion of sociological studies and research in the country. G. S. Ghurye, N. A. Toothi, D. N.Majmudar, B. N. Seal, K. M. Kapadia, Iravati Karve, S. V. Karanadikar, M. N. Srinivas, A. R. Desai, I. P. Desai, M. S. Gore and Y. B. Damle are some of the outstanding scholars who shaped the destiny of the discipline. And helped in the establishment of the development of sociology in India. Keywords: development ,Pre-Independence ,post-Independence. INTRODUCTION An attempt is made in this paper to traced the development of two closely linked and overlapping social sciences, viz., sociology and social anthropology in India and in that process to try to explicate the relationship between development and the cultural milieu in which it has occurred.
  • Paper 2 Perspectives of Indian Society-I

    Paper 2 Perspectives of Indian Society-I

    MA in Sociology Paper II Perspectives of Indian Society-I DIRECTORATE OF DISTANCE & CONTINUING EDUCATION UTKAL UNIVERSITY, Vani Vihar Bhubaneswar, India 1 UNIT-I INDOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE 1.1. Indology: Meaning and Definition Indology is known as the science of Indian Society. The Indological perspective claims to understand Indian Society through the concepts, theories and frameworks that are closely associated with Indian Civilization. It made a claim that Indian Society is unique in structure, function and dynamics and cannot be associated with the European Society. Indology relies on book view and culture and denounces rigorous empirical investigation. Indology is both an approach to study the Indian Society and also an independent discipline with Indian Society as subject matter. In both the form Indology consists of studying language, beliefs, ideas, customs, taboos, codes, institutions, rituals, ceremonies and other related components of culture. Indology demands inter-disciplinary, multi- disciplinary and cross disciplinary approach. Indology is also older than Sociology. It is antique in its origin owing its origin to 1784 by Sir William Jones of Calcutta. It was in the year 1987 that Sir William Jones founded the Asiatic Society of Bengal where he introduced the two departments of Sanskrit and Indology. It is the beginning of Indology in India, which has been followed by several other scholars. 1.2. Scholars of Indology As it is a fact that Indology is more a textual study, so a lot of scholars have conducted their studies depending on text. The studies conducted during this period covers a wide range of subjects such as social structure and relationships, cultural values, kinship, ideology, cultural 2 transactions and symbolism of life and the world etc.
  • Current Sociology

    Current Sociology

    Volume 62 Number 2 Monograph 1 March 2014 Current Sociology Journal of the International Sociological Association/ISA Association Internationale de Sociologie/AIS Asociación Internacional de Sociología/AIS Special Issue: Precarious Engagements: Combat in the Realm of Public Sociology Guest Editor: Michael Burawoy Articles Preface 135 Michael Burawoy Introduction: Sociology as a combat sport 140 Michael Burawoy The sociological windmill Amphibious sociology: Dilemmas and possibilities of public sociology in a multimedia world 156 César Rodríguez-Garavito In times of civil war: On being a schizophrenic (public) sociologist 168 Nandini Sundar Critical engagement in fields of power: Cycles of sociological activism in post-apartheid South Africa 181 Karl von Holdt The political minefield Complex entanglements: Moving from policy to public sociology in the Arab world 197 Sari Hanafi Worker–intellectual unity: Trans-border sociological intervention in Foxconn 209 Pun Ngai, Shen Yuan, Guo Yuhua, Lu Huilin, Jenny Chan and Mark Selden Interdependent power: Strategizing for the Occupy Movement 223 Frances Fox Piven Communicative Methodology: Successful actions and dialogic democracy 232 Ramon Flecha and Marta Soler Inconvenient truths Sociology’s interventions: Engaging the media and politics while remaining a social scientist 243 Michel Wieviorka Gender’s crooked path: Feminism confronts Russian patriarchy 253 Anna Temkina and Elena Zdravomyslova Inconvenient truths: A public intellectual’s pursuit of truth, justice and power 271 Walden Bello Conclusion Sociology as a vocation: Moral commitment and scientific imagination 279 Michael Burawoy Appendix: Global pedagogy in a digital age 285 Laleh Behbehanian and Michael Burawoy Visit http://csi.sagepub.com Free access to tables of contents and abstracts. Site-wide access to the full text for members of subscribing institutions.
  • Significant Lives: Biography, Autobiography, and Women's History in South Asia

    Significant Lives: Biography, Autobiography, and Women's History in South Asia

    Significant Lives: biography, autobiography, and women's history in South Asia Supriya Chaudhuri Cite this article: Significant Lives: biography, autobiography, and women's history in South Asia by Supriya Chaudhuri at https://oclw.web.ox.ac.uk/, via https://oclw.web.ox.ac.uk/significant-lives-biography-autobiography-and- womens-history-south-asia. Accessed on Monday, 1 June 2020. When I chose a title for this talk, I must have been recalling – though I didn’t realize this at the time -- a justly-celebrated essay by Carolyn Steedman, published in 1992 in the journal History and Theory, and titled ‘La Théorie que n’en est pas une: or, Why Clio doesn’t Care.’ In that essay, partly reworked from her own recently published biography of the socialist educator Margaret McMillan (Steedman 1990), Steedman suggested that the practice of biography made for a new understanding of women’s history, which might be described as an altered sense of the historical meaning and importance of female insignificance. The absence of women from conventional historical accounts, discussion of this absence (and discussion of the real archival difficulties that lie in the way of presenting their lives in a historical context) are at the same time a massive assertion of the littleness of what lies hidden. A sense of that which is lost, never to be recovered completely, is one of the most powerful organizing devices of modern women's history (Steedman 1992: 43). Steedman sees herself, then, as extending what Elizabeth Fox-Genovese had said more cryptically ten years earlier: that ‘women’s history challenges mainstream history, not to substitute the chronicle of the female subject for that of the male, but rather to restore conflict, ambiguity and tragedy to the historical process’ (Fox- Genovese 1982: 29).
  • Humanities and Social Sciences XH-C6: Sociology C6.1

    Humanities and Social Sciences XH-C6: Sociology C6.1

    XH-C6: Sociology C6.1 Sociological Theory C6.1.1 Classical Sociological Traditions: Emile Durkheim (Social Solidarity, Social Facts, Religion, Functionalism, Suicide, Anomie, Division of Labour, Law; Max Weber (Types of authority, Social action, Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, Bureaucracy, Ideal type, Methodology); Karl Marx: Class and class conflict, dialectical and historical materialism, capitalism, surplus value, alienation) C6.1.2 Structural-Functionalism and Structuralism: Bronislaw Malinowski; A.R. Radcliffe- Brown, Talcott Parsons (AGIL, Systems approach), Robert K. Merton (Middle range theory, reference groups, latent and manifest function), Claude Levi Strauss (Myths, Structuralism) C6.1.3 Hermeneutic and Interpretative Traditions: G.H. Mead, Alfred Schutz (Phenomenology); Harold Garfinkel (Ethnomethodology); Erving Goffman (Symbolic interaction, dramaturgy); ∙Clifford Geertz (Culture, thick description) C6.1.4 Post-Modernism, Post-Structuralism and Post-Colonialism: Pierre Bourdieu, Michel Foucault, Jurgen Habermas, Anthony Giddens, Frankfurt School C6.1.5 Conflict theory: Ralf Dahrendorf; C Wright Mills C6.1.6 Indian Thinkers, M.K. Gandhi, B.R. Ambedkar, Radha Kamal Mukherjee, G. S. Ghurye, M.N. Srinivas, Irawati Karve, C6.2 Research Methodology and Methods C6.2.1 Conceptualizing Social Reality: Philosophy of Science; ∙Scientific Method and Epistemology in Social Science; Hermeneutic Traditions; Objectivity and Reflexivity in Social Science; Ethics and Politics of research C6.2.2 Research Design:∙Reading Social
  • INDIA Transcript of Neera Desai Interview

    INDIA Transcript of Neera Desai Interview

    GLOBAL FEMINISMS: COMPARATIVE CASE STUDIES OF WOMEN’S ACTIVISM AND SCHOLARSHIP SITE: INDIA Transcript of Neera Desai Interviewer: C. S. Lakshmi Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra, India Date: 13-15 June, 2003 Language of Interview: English SPARROW Sound & Picture Archives for Research on Women B-32, Jeet Nagar, J.P. Road, Versova, Mumbai-400061 Tel: 2824 5958, 2826 8575 & 2632 8143 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.sparrowonline.org Acknowledgments Global Feminisms: Comparative Case Studies of Women’s Activism and Scholarship was housed at the Institute for Research on Women and Gender at the University of Michigan (UM) in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The project was co-directed by Abigail Stewart, Jayati Lal and Kristin McGuire. The China site was housed at the China Women’s University in Beijing, China and directed by Wang Jinling and Zhang Jian, in collaboration with UM faculty member Wang Zheng. The India site was housed at the Sound and Picture Archives for Research on Women (SPARROW) in Mumbai, India and directed by C.S. Lakshmi, in collaboration with UM faculty members Jayati Lal and Abigail Stewart. The Poland site was housed at Fundacja Kobiet eFKa (Women’s Foundation eFKa) in Krakow, Poland and directed by Slawka Walczewska, in collaboration with UM faculty member Magdalena Zaborowska. The U.S. site was housed at the Institute for Research on Women and Gender at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan and directed by UM faculty member Elizabeth Cole. Graduate student interns on the project included Nicola Curtin, Kim Dorazio, Jana Haritatos, Helen Ho, Julianna Lee, Sumiao Li, Zakiya Luna, Leslie Marsh, Sridevi Nair, Justyna Pas, Rosa Peralta, Desdamona Rios and Ying Zhang.