The History of Alamance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The History of Alamance THE LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA THE COLLECTION OF NORTH CAROLINIANA C971.1 586s c.2 UNIVERSITY OF N.C. AT CHAPEL HILL 00032761173 This book is due on the last date stamped below unless recalled sooner. It may be renewed only once and must be brought to the North Carolina Collection for renewal. £ COL. J. S. CARR. THE HISTORY OF ALAMANCE A WORK FOR THE DEGREE OF M. A. AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA. BY Miss S. W. Stockard. 9 9 W RALEIGH : Capital Printing Company. 1900. r TO GENERAL JULIAN SHAKSPERE CARR, A THANKSGIVING. INTRODUCTORY That our American Republic sprang into life full formed like Pallas from the head of Zeus seems miiaculous, but there is nothing wonderful about either. Both Eng- land and Zeus, you know, had been troubled with head pains. The English Church and Presbyterianism were sig- nificant. Runnymede, Magna Charta, the strength of the Anglo-saxon speech against the French and the Latin, the Cornish and the Celt, attest to the elasticity and might of the English consciousness. Every bill of rights foretold a possible America. Moore's Utopia was like an index finger pointing to Columbia, " The land of every land the pride." But to see things in their general light is easier than to dissect and vivisect particularly. And it might be pleas- anter to write a history of the Feejee Islanders, than to sit down among a people whose conflicting opinions have be- come a matter of history, and to try to tell the truth, abso- lute, unprejudiced. An account of the Indians is given, in the first place, for the children ; again, because they were the former land- owners. Haw River took its name from them. Alamance,* in Indian speech, they say, means all men's land, a universal sort of country ; and indeed it well might be so named ; Gov- ernor Morehead called the lovely sloping fields between Stinking Quarter Creek and the Big Alamance, his Eden. An Indian grave-yard has been found, not far from Glencoe ; the skeletons show them to have been buried in a sitting position. Their bones are crumbling back to dust ; two hundred years ago their huzzars rang loud and clear through forests and savannahs ; to-day a few arrow points, pots and skeletons remain to tell the story of that race, so relent- * Allemance, Alemany. It may be German. 6 INTRODUCTORY. lessly has time swept them away. Only their names enduring stay to ns. A thousand years are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a tale that is told This work is di proportionate, necessarily so. Some peo- ple preserve their family history while others do not. The Thompson family history is being prepared by Mr. Ed. Thompson, hence that is untouched. This history does not contain the whole of life as it once was in Alamance, the drama would come nearer that than history. I shall perhaps do better than this attempt when fortune smiles, and I can have more leisure. But those, who dared all things, whose courage was invin- cible, who, by their valiant hope and endeavor, gave us a name and a home, are too good to be forgotten. They came from Ireland, England, Scotland, Germany, by way of Pennsylvania in wagons to Alamance, a beautiful but a wild country, inhabited not bv Amalakites and Jebuzites, but by treacherous Indians. The vibrations of the energy of our forefathers should still make us tingle with desire to accomplish. Capt. Stockard lives on the old homestead, that James Stockard owned before the Regulation War. The land of Michael Holt, extending from Greensboro almost to Hills- boro, still belongs to his descendants, enough for the whole family. Dr. D. A. Long lives on the land he got by his great grandfather from the Crown—"Long Land." Mr. W. H. Trolinger, Mr. J. R. Garret, Mr. Van Montgomery, Mr. Nathaniel Woody, etc., received their land " to have and to hold " by right from the agents of King George. It is said that the purest race on earth live in North Carolina for these reasons. Her early settlers came, being driven by religious and political persecutions, to establish homes. The energy and cream of other nations, denomi- nations and parties settled this State between 1700— 1776 and while many have gone out to people the West there has been no immigration since. INTRODUCTORY. 7 Our young people should know the price of their liberty and our old people must not forget for " Good deeds dying tongueless Slaughter a thousand waiting on that." and If this work meets with approbation in Alamance helps to disseminate a knowledge so dear to us all, if it could but be an incentive to a more noble endeavor, then, that I have done it may be, has been granted one fond wish something. THE HISTORY OF ALAMANCE, CHAPTER I. North Carolina is as rich in noble deeds of daring men as Scotland. The knowledge of what Scotchmen endured and availed was an incentive to the Scotch. It also gave them self-confidence, less to fear in seeming failure, and a long look ahead. So may it be to us. The fact that the sturdy Scots are given a place in the shining temple of fame is due large'y to Percy's Reliques, to Burns, and to Sir Walter Scott's works. They merited this high honor. Their deeds were seeds that would have died in the embryo but for these men who preserved them to sow broadcast forever over the English speaking world. A comprehensive history of North Carolina would be invaluable. For the historian holds the same relation to the mind of man as the farmer does to his body. But the historian is a man of the most liberial culture, large grasp of ideas, leisure, no cares for daily bread, un- prejudiced, magnanimous. Such an one the ravens ought to feed and manna be sent him from heaven. History is a narrative not having beginning or end. Un- written history is a labyrinth, a jumble of incidents without the silver thread of agumentation or exposition. It is like the beads of a rotary, unconnected, disjointed, broken. Written history is fossilized life, a latent energy—stored strength for new endeavor. Prosperous wise and happy are that people who have a noble history and read it. To write a history of North Carolina would be work for a Ufetime. To write historical sketches of one's county is IO THE HISTORY OF ALAMANCE more within the range of one with limited facilities and leisure. Alamance was never a barren waste. Four hundred years ago the red man revelled here in luxurious nature. He could kill more deer than could be eaten on "Stinking Quarter" creek. Not only did he succeed in living like a lord but "writ his name in water." So the rivers and the springs ripple and sing to the music of the names he gave them—Altamahaw, Ossipee, Saxapahaw and Alamance. Besides the Indian and far above him in might there have lived among us great men in the high noon of their useful- ness. The names of Murphy, Ruffin, Bingham and Wilson adorn the county they have blessed. Their sun has set but the good deeds they've done come out to shine like the stars that glorify the night. In 1 77 1 Chatham and Lord North were "thundering in Parliament," the letters of "Junius" were attracting general attention, all sorts of political contentions were hurled against King George's government, and far away across the Atlantic the farmers of Orange county, North Carolina, were making resistance to the oppression of King George's representatives—Governor Tryon and Col. Edmund Fan- ning—at Hillsboro who were contributing to the oppression of American citizens. There lived in Southwest Alamance one Herman Hus- bands who hailed from Philadelphia and is said to have been a kinsman of Benjamin Franklin Charged with ani- mation but without that higher element of bravery, he ap- plied a spark to the fuse that flamed into the conflagration that burnt up the system of English domination. Husbands lived among men driven from home by civic and religious persecutions. Having prevailed over man and nature their spirit of freedom was epidemic. No wonder that he found it an easy task to organize such men into the famous " Regulators." These were to help each other in all trouble growing out of a refusal to pay the unlawful demands of the Rulers. THE HISTORY OF ALAMANCE. II On May 16, 1771 Governor Tryon met about two thou- sand Regulators on the plains of Alamance. Then was the first blood shed for freedom on American soil ; that was the first open resistance against the oppression of King George's rule. The battle of Alamance, N. C, and not the battle of Lexington, Mass., was the beginning of the Revolutionary war. It was a fight against the primal cause of the war for American Independence. It is interesting to know the names of some of the people who lived here then. By tradition we know who made opposition to tyranny. In some cases the old spelling shows the nationality. On the west side of Haw river, or Saxa- pahaw river, which runs length-wise of the county from north to south were the Houltz, the Strolingers, the Longs, the Stockards, the Trowsdales, the Freelands, the Albrights, the Shavers or Shepherds, the Whitesides now Whitsetts, the Thompsons, the Newlins, the Grimes now Grahams here, but not changed in other parts the Isleys, the Sharpes and the Hornadays.
Recommended publications
  • 'Deprived of Their Liberty'
    'DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY': ENEMY PRISONERS AND THE CULTURE OF WAR IN REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA, 1775-1783 by Trenton Cole Jones A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June, 2014 © 2014 Trenton Cole Jones All Rights Reserved Abstract Deprived of Their Liberty explores Americans' changing conceptions of legitimate wartime violence by analyzing how the revolutionaries treated their captured enemies, and by asking what their treatment can tell us about the American Revolution more broadly. I suggest that at the commencement of conflict, the revolutionary leadership sought to contain the violence of war according to the prevailing customs of warfare in Europe. These rules of war—or to phrase it differently, the cultural norms of war— emphasized restricting the violence of war to the battlefield and treating enemy prisoners humanely. Only six years later, however, captured British soldiers and seamen, as well as civilian loyalists, languished on board noisome prison ships in Massachusetts and New York, in the lead mines of Connecticut, the jails of Pennsylvania, and the camps of Virginia and Maryland, where they were deprived of their liberty and often their lives by the very government purporting to defend those inalienable rights. My dissertation explores this curious, and heretofore largely unrecognized, transformation in the revolutionaries' conduct of war by looking at the experience of captivity in American hands. Throughout the dissertation, I suggest three principal factors to account for the escalation of violence during the war. From the onset of hostilities, the revolutionaries encountered an obstinate enemy that denied them the status of legitimate combatants, labeling them as rebels and traitors.
    [Show full text]
  • 1835. EXECUTIVE. *L POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT
    1835. EXECUTIVE. *l POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT. Persons employed in the General Post Office, with the annual compensation of each. Where Compen­ Names. Offices. Born. sation. Dol. cts. Amos Kendall..., Postmaster General.... Mass. 6000 00 Charles K. Gardner Ass't P. M. Gen. 1st Div. N. Jersey250 0 00 SelahR. Hobbie.. Ass't P. M. Gen. 2d Div. N. York. 2500 00 P. S. Loughborough Chief Clerk Kentucky 1700 00 Robert Johnson. ., Accountant, 3d Division Penn 1400 00 CLERKS. Thomas B. Dyer... Principal Book Keeper Maryland 1400 00 Joseph W. Hand... Solicitor Conn 1400 00 John Suter Principal Pay Clerk. Maryland 1400 00 John McLeod Register's Office Scotland. 1200 00 William G. Eliot.. .Chie f Examiner Mass 1200 00 Michael T. Simpson Sup't Dead Letter OfficePen n 1200 00 David Saunders Chief Register Virginia.. 1200 00 Arthur Nelson Principal Clerk, N. Div.Marylan d 1200 00 Richard Dement Second Book Keeper.. do.. 1200 00 Josiah F.Caldwell.. Register's Office N. Jersey 1200 00 George L. Douglass Principal Clerk, S. Div.Kentucky -1200 00 Nicholas Tastet Bank Accountant Spain. 1200 00 Thomas Arbuckle.. Register's Office Ireland 1100 00 Samuel Fitzhugh.., do Maryland 1000 00 Wm. C,Lipscomb. do : for) Virginia. 1000 00 Thos. B. Addison. f Record Clerk con-> Maryland 1000 00 < routes and v....) Matthias Ross f. tracts, N. Div, N. Jersey1000 00 David Koones Dead Letter Office Maryland 1000 00 Presley Simpson... Examiner's Office Virginia- 1000 00 Grafton D. Hanson. Solicitor's Office.. Maryland 1000 00 Walter D. Addison. Recorder, Div. of Acc'ts do..
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona SAR Hosts First Grave Marking FALL 2018 Vol
    FALL 2018 Vol. 113, No. 2 Q Orange County Bound for Congress 2019 Q Spain and the American Revolution Q Battle of Alamance Q James Tilton: 1st U.S. Army Surgeon General Arizona SAR Hosts First Grave Marking FALL 2018 Vol. 113, No. 2 24 Above, the Gen. David Humphreys Chapter of the Connecticut Society participated in the 67th annual Fourth of July Ceremony at Grove Street Cemetery in New Haven, 20 Connecticut; left, the Tilton Mansion, now the University and Whist Club. 8 2019 SAR Congress Convenes 13 Solid Light Reception 20 Delaware’s Dr. James Tilton in Costa Mesa, California The Prison Ship Martyrs Memorial Membership 22 Arizona’a First Grave Marking 14 9 State Society & Chapter News SAR Travels to Scotland 24 10 2018 SAR Annual Conference 16 on the American Revolution 38 In Our Memory/New Members 18 250th Series: The Battle 12 Tomb of the Unknown Soldier of Alamance 46 When You Are Traveling THE SAR MAGAZINE (ISSN 0161-0511) is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) and copyrighted by the National Society of the Sons of the American Revolution, 809 West Main Street, Louisville, KY 40202. Periodicals postage paid at Louisville, KY and additional mailing offices. Membership dues include The SAR Magazine. Subscription rate $10 for four consecutive issues. Single copies $3 with checks payable to “Treasurer General, NSSAR” mailed to the HQ in Louisville. Products and services advertised do not carry NSSAR endorsement. The National Society reserves the right to reject content of any copy. Send all news matter to Editor; send the following to NSSAR Headquarters: address changes, election of officers, new members, member deaths.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Inventory of Alamance County, North Carolina
    AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA Alamance County Historic Properties Commission August, 2019 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY OF ALAMANCE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA A SPECIAL PROJECT OF THE ALAMANCE COUNTY HISTORIC PROPERTIES COMMISSION August 5, 2019 This inventory is an update of the Alamance County Archaeological Survey Project, published by the Research Laboratories of Anthropology, UNC-Chapel Hill in 1986 (McManus and Long 1986). The survey project collected information on 65 archaeological sites. A total of 177 archaeological sites had been recorded prior to the 1986 project making a total of 242 sites on file at the end of the survey work. Since that time, other archaeological sites have been added to the North Carolina site files at the Office of State Archaeology, Department of Natural and Cultural Resources in Raleigh. The updated inventory presented here includes 410 sites across the county and serves to make the information current. Most of the information in this document is from the original survey and site forms on file at the Office of State Archaeology and may not reflect the current conditions of some of the sites. This updated inventory was undertaken as a Special Project by members of the Alamance County Historic Properties Commission (HPC) and published in-house by the Alamance County Planning Department. The goals of this project are three-fold and include: 1) to make the archaeological and cultural heritage of the county more accessible to its citizens; 2) to serve as a planning tool for the Alamance County Planning Department and provide aid in preservation and conservation efforts by the county planners; and 3) to serve as a research tool for scholars studying the prehistory and history of Alamance County.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination
    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2021 "Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley" : The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination William R. Tharp Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd Part of the Cultural History Commons, and the United States History Commons © The Author Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/6707 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. “Savage and Bloody Footsteps Through the Valley” The Wyoming Massacre in the American Imagination A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts at Virginia Commonwealth University By. William R. Tharp Dr. Carolyn Eastman, Advisor Associate Professor, Department of History Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia 14 May 2021 Tharp 1 © William R. Tharp 2021 All Rights Reserved Tharp 2 Abstract Along the banks of the Susquehanna River in early July 1778, a force of about 600 Loyalist and Native American raiders won a lopsided victory against 400 overwhelmed Patriot militiamen and regulars in the Wyoming Valley of Pennsylvania. While not well-known today, this battle—the Battle of Wyoming—had profound effects on the Revolutionary War and American culture and politics. Quite familiar to early Americans, this battle’s remembrance influenced the formation of national identity and informed Americans’ perceptions of their past and present over the course of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • David Fanning and Retaliatory Violence Between Tories and Whigs in the Revolutionary Carolinas
    “Blood for blood”: David Fanning and Retaliatory Violence between Tories and Whigs in the Revolutionary Carolinas By: Gregory Mayr History 586: Advanced Seminar in History Kansas State University Spring 2014 Professor Louise Breen Abstract This paper, relying primarily on Loyalist Colonel David Fanning’s personal narrative of the American Revolution, will argue that Fanning applied, in some of his actions, a form of retributive reasoning similar to that described by Historians Wayne E. Lee and Jeffrey J. Crow as typical for the revolutionary Carolinas. In Fanning’s case, the code by which he decided what to do in given situations was more complex than a one-dimensional law of retaliation; Fanning made an effort to incorporate conventional forms of honor into his actions, but harbored a great deal of distrust for his adversaries that came out of the experiences he had during the Revolution with his Whig opponents. His targets were purposive, aimed at Whig leadership, supplies and government officials. Fanning’s level of violence escalated toward the end of the revolution due to his genuine disdain for the rebels and his resentment at fighting what he eventually acknowledged to be a losing war. Keywords: Fanning; Retaliation; Retribution; lex talionis; Burke 2 On 28 February 1782, the infamous loyalist partisan David Fanning wrote a cold and threatening letter of protest to Governor Thomas Burke of North Carolina. The Whig government had hanged “three of my men, one Captain and two privates,” and was detaining an additional “Captain and six men under the sentence of death.”1 Fanning knew that the British cause had entered its death throes with the definitive American victory at Yorktown, Virginia, in October, 1781, but fighting units remained mobilized until the signing of the peace treaty in 1783, and in the meantime governments throughout the former colonies had to make decisions about how to deal with the militia men who continued the civil war in the southern frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • H.J.R. 1130 GENERAL ASSEMBLY of NORTH CAROLINA May 18, 2016 SESSION 2015 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK H D HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION DRHJR40621-LG-143C (04/05)
    H.J.R. 1130 GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA May 18, 2016 SESSION 2015 HOUSE PRINCIPAL CLERK H D HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION DRHJR40621-LG-143C (04/05) Sponsors: Representatives Pittman, Speciale, Brody, and Ford (Primary Sponsors). Referred to: 1 A JOINT RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE COMMITMENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF 2 THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA TO THE PRINCIPLES AND THE ENFORCEMENT 3 OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS IN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF 4 AMERICA, WHILE HONORING THE MEMORY OF WILLIE JONES OF HALIFAX 5 COUNTY, DAVID CALDWELL OF GUILFORD COUNTY, AND OTHER NORTH 6 CAROLINA CITIZENS AND THE INFLUENCE THEY HAD ON THE CREATION AND 7 ADOPTION OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS. 8 Whereas, the State of North Carolina was 12th among the original 13 States to ratify 9 the United States Constitution; and 10 Whereas, the State of North Carolina refused to ratify the United States Constitution 11 unless a Bill of Rights was added, guaranteeing the freedom and rights of the People and the 12 ability of the States to govern themselves in all matters in regard to which the United States 13 Constitution did not expressly grant authority to the federal government; and 14 Whereas, anti-federalists who insisted upon a Bill of Rights included Willie Jones of 15 Halifax County, who not only served as a member of the commission that drafted the first State 16 Constitution of the State of North Carolina and as a member of the House of Commons throughout 17 the Revolution, but also served one term in the Continental Congress in 1780; and 18 Whereas, David Caldwell of
    [Show full text]
  • Valentine Morgan S1567
    Southern Campaigns American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Valentine Morgan S1567 f12NC Transcribed by Will Graves 5/15/09: rev'd 6/3/17 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as numerals rather
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina's Federalists in an Evolving Public
    NORTH CAROLINA’S FEDERALISTS IN AN EVOLVING PUBLIC SPHERE, 1790-1810 Scott King-Owen A Thesis Submitted to the University of North Carolina at Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of North Carolina at Wilmington 2006 Approved by Advisory Committee _______Dr. Chris Fonvielle_______ _________Dr. Paul Townend__________ __________Dr. Alan Watson________ Chair Accepted by ______________________________ Dean, Graduate School TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv DEDICATION.................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 – NORTH CAROLINA AND ITS FEDERALIST LEADERSHIP........... 16 CHAPTER 2 – PRESS AND PUBLIC IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY................. 44 CHAPTER 3 – WILLIAM BOYLAN, FEDERALIST PARTISAN ............................... 68 CHAPTER 4 – THE WAR OF THE EDITORS .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • S31104 Andrew Harwell A/K/A Harvey
    Southern Campaign American Revolution Pension Statements & Rosters Pension application of Andrew Harwell a/k/a Harvey S31104 f15VA Transcribed by Will Graves rev'd 2/27/14 & 5/27/15 [Methodology: Spelling, punctuation and/or grammar have been corrected in some instances for ease of reading and to facilitate searches of the database. Where the meaning is not compromised by adhering to the spelling, punctuation or grammar, no change has been made. Corrections or additional notes have been inserted within brackets or footnotes. Blanks appearing in the transcripts reflect blanks in the original. A bracketed question mark indicates that the word or words preceding it represent(s) a guess by me. The word 'illegible' or 'indecipherable' appearing in brackets indicates that at the time I made the transcription, I was unable to decipher the word or phrase in question. Only materials pertinent to the military service of the veteran and to contemporary events have been transcribed. Affidavits that provide additional information on these events are included and genealogical information is abstracted, while standard, 'boilerplate' affidavits and attestations related solely to the application, and later nineteenth and twentieth century research requests for information have been omitted. I use speech recognition software to make all my transcriptions. Such software misinterprets my southern accent with unfortunate regularity and my poor proofreading skills fail to catch all misinterpretations. Also, dates or numbers which the software treats as numerals rather than words are not corrected: for example, the software transcribes "the eighth of June one thousand eighty six" as "the 8th of June 1786." Please call material errors or omissions to my attention.] [State of Kentucky, Perry County] Revolutionary Claim For the purpose of obtaining the benefit of an act entitled, "An Act supplementary to an act for the relief of certain Officers and Soldiers of the Army of the Revolution," approved on the 7th of June 1832.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Considers the Constitution
    Notre Dame Law School NDLScholarship Journal Articles Publications 1987 Law and the Experience of Politics in Late Eighteenth-Century North Carolina: North Carolina Considers the Constitution Walter F. Pratt Notre Dame Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Walter F. Pratt, Law and the Experience of Politics in Late Eighteenth-Century North Carolina: North Carolina Considers the Constitution, 22 Wake Forest L. Rev. 577 (1987). Available at: https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/law_faculty_scholarship/378 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal Articles by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAW AND THE EXPERIENCE OF POLITICS IN LATE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY NORTH CAROLINA: NORTH CAROLINA CONSIDERS THE CONSTITUTION Walter F. Pratt,Jr.* In mid-summer 1788, nearly three hundred delegates assembled in Hillsborough to consider whether North Carolina would ratify the Consti- tution drafted the previous year in Philadelphia.1 When the convention began the delegates were certain of two facts: First, regardless of their decision, a government would soon be established; ten states had already ratified the Constitution, one more than necessary.2 Second, the oppo- nents of the Constitution knew they had a substantial majority in the * Associate Professor of Law, University of Notre Dame. I am indebted to the editors of the Documentary History of the Constitutional Convention at the University of Wiscon- sin, Madison, for so graciously allowing me access to their files.
    [Show full text]
  • Aftermath of the Battle of Alamance
    Published on NCpedia (https://www.ncpedia.org) Home > ANCHOR > Revolutionary North Carolina (1763-1790) > The Regulators: Introduction > Aftermath of the Battle of Alamance Aftermath of the Battle of Alamance [1] Share it now! A few weeks after the Battle of Alamance in May 1771, an account of the battle and its aftermath made its way to various newspapers throughout the colonies, including as far north as the Boston Gazette. The account included included report of the casualties, which may have been exaggerated, and a call for a reward for the capture of the outlaws, Herman Husband, Rednap Howell, and William Butler. Below is a transcription of the Boston Gazette account. It includes annotations for historical commentary and definitions. Newbern (North Carolina) June 7. Since our last, the Hon. Samuel Cornell, Esq., returned home from our Troops in Orange County, and brings a certain Account of the Regulators being entirely broken and dispersed [2], and that near 13 or 1400 of them have laid down their arms, taken the Oaths ofA llegiance [3] to his Majesty, and returned to their Habitations [4] in Peace. His Excellency the Governor, after the Battle, marched into the Plantations of Husband, Hunter, and several others of the outlawed Chiefs of the Regulators, and laid them waste; they having most of them escaped from the Battle, and are since fled. A reward of 1000 Acres of Land, and 100 Dollars, is offered by his Excellency for Husband, Hunter, Butler, and Rednap Howell, and several of the Regulators have been permitted to go in Quest of them, on leaving their Children Hostages.
    [Show full text]