Industrial Disputes Referred for Adjudication
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
© Reg. No. cPn. \º¿ Government of Kerala tIcf k¿°m¿ KL/TV(N)/12/2009-2011 2011 KERALA GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY 6th December 2011 Unkw-_¿ Vol. LVI THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, TUESDAY 2011 6 No. 48 hmeyw 56 } Xncp-h-\-¥-]p-cw, sNmΔ 15th Agrahayana 1933 \º¿ } 1933 A{K-lmb\w 15 PART I Notifications and Orders issued by the Government Labour and Rehabilitation Department And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is nec- Labour and Rehabilitation (A) essary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; ORDERS Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred (1) by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct G. O. (Rt.) No. 1644/2011/LBR. that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudication Thiruvananthapuram, 31st October 2011. to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court will pass Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an the award within a period of three months. industrial dispute exists between 1. The Manager, ANNEXURE Krishnagiri/Ramagiri Estate, Appapara P. O., Thirunelli, Mananthavady, Wayanad. 2. Sri B. Muthu, Proprietor, Whether the denial of work to 1. Smt. P. K. Santha, Krishnagiri Estate, Appapara P. O., Thirunelli, 2. Smt. Leela Bhaskaran, 3. Smt. Nabeesa Rafeeque, Mananthavady, Wayanad. 3. Sri B. Raju, Proprietor, 4. Smt. Kumari, 5. Smt. Rajamma Subhrahmanian, Ramagiri Estate, Appapara P. O., Thirunelli, Mananthavady, 6. Smt. Ragini Viswanathan, 7. Smt. Meenakshi Jogi, Wayanad and the workman of the above referred 8. Smt. Santha Rajan, 9. Smt. Bhanu Suresh, establishment represented by Sri P. K. Kunhimoideen, 10. Smt. Kavery, 11. Smt. Vella, 12. Smt. Meenashi, General Secretary, Malabar Estate Workers Union, 13. Smt. Rukhiya, 14. Smt. Devu Chandran by the Reg. No. 103662, INTUC, Geetha Stores, Kalpetta, management of Krishnagiri/Ramagiri Estate of Wayanad-673 577 in respect of matters mentioned in the Thirunelly Panchayath is justifiable ? 2. If not, what annexure to this order; are the relief the above workers are entitled for ? (2) ANNEXURE G. O. (Rt.) No. 1710/2011/LBR. Whether the denial of employment to Sri Muralidharan, s/o Kunjappan by Sri Chenthamara, Licensee, Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011. Group 4, T. S. No. 9, Chittoor Excise Range is justi- Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an fiable? If not, what relief he is entitled to? industrial dispute exists between Sri Chenthamara s/o. (4) Velayudhan, Edayamkulamb, Vandithavalam P. O., Pattanchery, Chittoor Taluk and the workman of the above G. O. (Rt.) No. 1715/2011/LBR. referred establishment Sri Pankajakshan s/o. Raman, Mele Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011. Veedu Kalam, Karikulam, Vilayodi P. O., Chittoor Taluk in Whereas, the Government are of opinion that respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; an industrial dispute exists between the Managing Direc- And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is tor, M/s. Chackosons Chemicals Private Limited, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Mulankunnathukavu P. O., Thrissur-680 581 and the adjudication; workman of the above referred establishment Sri M. K. Vidyasagaran s/o Kunjakkan, Madakkavil House, Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred Gramala, Mulankunnathukavu P. O., Thrissur-680 581 in by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to this order; 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The adjudication; Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred three months. by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of ANNEXURE 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby di- Whether the denial of employment to Sri Pankajakshan rect that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudi- s/o. Raman by Sri Chenthamara s/o Velayudhan, cation to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. Edayamkulamb, Vandithavalam, Licensee, Chittoor The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period Excise Range Group 4 is justifiable ? If not, what relief of three months. he is entitled to? ANNEXURE (3) 1. Whether the dismissal of employee Sri M. K. Vidyasagaran by the Management of G. O. (Rt.) No. 1713/2011/LBR. M/s. Chackosons Chemicals Private Limited, Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011. Mulankunnathukavu is justifiable? Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an 2. If not, what all benefit, Sri M. K. Vidyasagaran is industrial dispute exists between Sri Chenthamara entitled to get? s/o. Velayudhan, Edayamkulamb, Vandithavalam P. O., (5) Pattanchery, Chittoor Taluk and the workman of the above referred establishment Sri Muralidharan s/o. Kunjappan, G. O. (Rt.) No. 1716/2011/LBR. Mithunam, Pallathampulli, Thathamangalam P. O., Chittoor Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011. Taluk in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure to Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an this order; industrial dispute exists between 1. The President, And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Kulappully Service Co-operative Bank Limited, necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for Shornur P. O., Palakkad-679 122, 2. The Secretary, adjudication; Kulappully Service Co-operative Bank Limited, Shornur P. O., Palakkad-679 122 and the workman of the Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred above referred establishment Sri P. Krishnaprasad, by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of s/o Raghavan, Palakkal House, Kulappully, Shornur-2, 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby Palakkad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for to this order; adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for three months. adjudication; Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby adjudication; direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. The by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period of direct that the said industrial dispute be referred for three months. adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. ANNEXURE The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period Whether the dismissal of the employee, Sri P. Krishnaprasad, of three months. Peon from the service of the Kulappully Service ANNEXURE Co-operative Bank Limited, Shornur with effect from 1. Whether the termination of service of Smt. V. I. Nalini, 20-5-2010 by the Management is justifiable ? If not, Part Time Sweeper on daily wages by the employer what relief he is entitled to? i.e. Thrissur District Co-operative Bank Limited, Thrissur is justifiable? (6) 2. If not, what all remedies she is entitled ? G. O. (Rt.) No. 1717/2011/LBR. (8) Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011. G. O. (Rt.) No. 1721/2011/LBR. Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an in- Thiruvananthapuram, 11th November 2011. dustrial dispute exists between Sri V. J. Thankachan, Whereas, the Government are of opinion that an Vennayappillil Veedu, Nadavayal P. O., Wayanad and industrial dispute exists between the Managing Director, the workman of the above referred establishment Kerala Feeds Limited, Kallettumkara, Thrissur and the workman of the above referred establishment represented Sri A. S. Padmanabhan, Alumoolayil, Nadvayal P. O., by the President, Kerala Feeds Workers Union, Wayanad in respect of matters mentioned in the annexure Kallettumkara, Thrissur in respect of matters mentioned in to this order; the annexure to this order; And whereas, in the opinion of Government it is nec- And Whereas, in the opinion of Government it is essary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudication; necessary to refer the said industrial dispute for adjudica- Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred tion; by section 10 (1) (c) of the Industrial Disputes Act of Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby di- by section 10 (1) (d) of the Industrial Disputes Act of rect that the said industrial dispute be referred for adjudi- 1947 (Central Act XIV of 1947) the Government hereby direct that the said industrial dispute be referred cation to the Labour Court, Kannur. The Labour Court for adjudication to the Industrial Tribunal, Palakkad. will pass the award within a period of three months. The Industrial Tribunal will pass the award within a period ANNEXURE of three months. 1.Whether the denial of employment to ANNEXURE Sri A. S. Padmanabhan, Alumoolayil, Nadvayal P. O. Whether there is any anomaly in fixation of pay as per Wayanad by the employer is justifiable? LTS dated 9-4-2008 in respect of Sri Fazaludeen, B. S., Technician of Kerala Feeds Limited, Kallettumkara as 2. If not, what are the reliefs the worker is entitled to? alleged