BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES of Tuta Absoluta to a WILD and CULTIVATED

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES of Tuta Absoluta to a WILD and CULTIVATED BEHAVIORAL RESPONSES OF Tuta absoluta TO A WILD AND CULTIVATED TOMATO PLANTS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF THE MEDIATING SEMIOCHEMICAL BLENDS RAPHAEL NJURAI MIANO (B. Ed Sc.) I56/28944/2013 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree of Master of Science in Chemistry in the School of Pure and Applied Sciences of Kenyatta University NOVEMBER 2017 ii DECLARATION Declaration by Candidate This thesis is my original work and has not been presented for a degree in any other University or any other award. Raphael Njurai Miano (I56/28944/2013) Department of Chemistry Signature ………………………………… Date ………………………………… Declaration by Supervisors We confirm that the work reported in this thesis was carried out and submitted by the candidate with our approval as University supervisors. Dr. Richard Musau Department of Chemistry Signature ………………………………… Date ………………………………………. Dr. Faris Samira Mohammed International Centre for Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE) Signature ………………………………… Date ……………………………………...... Prof. Ahmed Hassanali Department of Chemistry Signature ……………………………………... Date …………………………………… iii DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my late father, Mzee Miano Njogu, who inspired me throughout my entire school life, my mother, Eunice Njoki Miano, my siblings, my wife Mary Wanjiku and my children Gift, Joy, Vincent and Cleopas for their patience, love, prayers and moral support that they accorded me throughout my study time. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My sincere thanks to the almighty God for this far He has brought me. My special thanks to my supervisors; Dr. Richard Musau, Dr. Samira Mohammed and Prof. Ahmed Hassanali for their intellectual and technical guidance and support that has molded me for this achievement. My thanks to Dr. Sunday Ekesi, Plant Health Theme, International Center for Insect Physiology and ecology, ICIPE, for allowing me do my research in his abled department. My thanks to Prof. Baldwyn Torto, Behavioral & Chemical Ecology Department, ICIPE, for allowing me perform gas chromatography – linked mass spectroscopy, GC–MS, and gas chromatography – linked electroantennographic detector, GC–EAD, in the behavioral and chemical ecology laboratories. My gratitude goes to Dr. Wilber Lwande, Environment Health Division, ICIPE, for allocating me working and storage space in the laboratory. Also extend my sincere thanks to Dr. Daisy Salifu, Biostatistics Unit, ICIPE, for her contribution in statistical analysis. My thanks to Mr. Wanyama Onesmus Kaye, Senior Research Assistant, ICIPE, Kenya for his guidance in performing GC–MS and GC–EAD, Mr. Gershons Ongeche, Mechanical Technician, ICIPE Kenya, for his special guidance during the construction of the duo–choice olfactometer. My warm and totally inadequate thanks to the Director General, ICIPE Kenya for hosting me in the center during research. Special thanks to Tuta IPM, and the Federal Ministry for economic Cooperation and Development for funding this project. I would also like to highly appreciate the National Commission for Science, Technology and Innovation (NACOSTI) for research funds reference number, NACOSTI/RCD/ST& I7th CALL/ M.Sc/037 that enabled completion of this work. Finally my thanks to my family and any other member of the community who have given me support, encouragement, love and prayer. v TABLE OF CFONTENTS DECLARATION .............................................................................................................................................. ii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................................. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................................................... ix ABBREVIATIONS AND ACCRONYMS ................................................................................................ xi ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................................................... xiii CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background information ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.9 Problem statement and justification of the study ................................................................................ 5 1.10 Hypotheses ................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.11 Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.11.1 General objective .................................................................................................................................. 6 1.11.2 Specific objectives ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.12 Significance of the study ........................................................................................................................ 7 1.13 Scope and limitations of the study ....................................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER TWO .............................................................................................................................................. 8 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Tuta absoluta morphology ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Life cycle of T. absoluta ........................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Migration and distribution of T. absoluta in Africa.......................................................................... 12 2.4 Control methods of T. absoluta ............................................................................................................ 15 2.4.1 Cultural methods ................................................................................................................................... 15 vi 2.4.2 Biological methods............................................................................................................................... 15 2.4.3 Chemical methods ................................................................................................................................ 16 2.4.4 Semiochemicals .................................................................................................................................... 17 2.4.5 Sterile males .......................................................................................................................................... 20 2.4.6 Light Traps ............................................................................................................................................. 20 2.4.7 Host – Plant Resistance ....................................................................................................................... 20 2.4.8 Integrated Pest Management Strategy, IPM ................................................................................... 21 2.5 Economic importance of T. absoluta ................................................................................................... 21 2.6 Environmental impact ............................................................................................................................. 22 2.7 Chemical communication ....................................................................................................................... 23 2.8 Wild tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme) and cultivated tomato, (Solanum lycoperscon L., Rambo F1) .................................................................................................................... 27 CHAPTER THREE ........................................................................................................................................ 32 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................................ 32 3.1 Wild tomatoes and cultivated tomatoes plants .................................................................................. 32 3.2 Source of T. absoluta colony ................................................................................................................. 33 3.3 Field layout for mono-crop and inter-crop of the two tomato varieties ....................................... 34 3.4 Dual – choice wind tunnel (olfactometer) for behavioral responses of mated T. absoluta female to wild tomato and cultivated tomato ..................................................................................... 35 3.5 Experimental procedure for the T. absoluta behavioral
Recommended publications
  • Tuta Absoluta
    South American tomato moth Tuta absoluta Figure 1. Tomato fruit showing holes created by Tuta absoluta larvae Background Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is a pest of tomatoes in South America, mining the leaves and burrowing into the fruit (fig. 1). Since the first detection of this pest in Europe, in Spain in 2006, it has been spreading rapidly through Southern Europe causing very high levels of damage to tomato crops in some regions. Tuta absoluta was added to the European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation A1 pest list in 2004. Geographical Distribution Tuta absoluta is native to Central America, and has spread to South America. It has been recorded from Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela; it is found in regions less than 1000 m above sea level. The moth was introduced into Spain and first detected in 2006. It is now present in several PLANT PEST FACTSHEET provinces, including Castellón, Valencia and the island of Ibiza, and appears to be spreading. Algeria and Morocco reported outbreaks in 2008, both of which are under official control measures. Tuta absoluta was also found in four regions of Italy in 2008 (Calabria, Campania, Sardegna and Sicily), and in 2009 outbreaks were reported for the first time in France (in Corsica and Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur) and Tunisia. All the European records to date have been on tomato crops, with no evidence of damage to other plants. The Netherlands and the UK have found Tuta absoluta infesting imports of Spanish tomatoes, but these are incidental findings and there is no evidence in either country of an outbreak to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuta Absoluta Biology, Damage and Control, a South African Perspective Background
    Tuta absoluta Biology, Damage and Control, a South African Perspective Background • Tuta absoluta is one of the most destructive pests of tomato • It originated in South America • Europe: First reported in 2006 • South Africa: First reported in 2016 • Latin name: Tuta absoluta • Common name: Tomato leafminer • Because of the easy pronunciation, the pest is mostly known as Tuta absoluta Host plants Hosts for Tuta absoluta mainly include plants in the potato family Solanaceae Main host Other crops as hosts Tomato Potato*, eggplant, Capsicum, tobacco** and Cape gooseberry Additional hosts Many weed species, mostly solanaceous weeds, are hosts for Tuta absoluta. Rare or doubtful hosts include; bean, cabbage, mallow and others. *foliage only (research is currently being conducted for verification) **to be confirmed Tuta absoluta: summary of life cycle Eggs • Laid on foliage or fruit (usually singly, but also in groups of 2-5) • 4-5 days to hatch (slower under cool conditions) Larvae • Light in colour when young – becoming greenish • Feed inside leaves, stems or fruit • Duration approximately 8-14 days (slower under cool conditions) • Fourth instar exits from feeding locations to pupate Tuta absoluta: summary of life cycle Pupae • Pupae are formed inside strong silken cocoons, constructed by the fourth instar • Cocoons are constructed mostly at soil level, but also in leaf mines and folded foliage • Cocoons are mostly hidden or camouflaged by foliage or sand/dirt particles • Duration approximately 7-10 days (slower under cool conditions) Moths
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Trap Color on Captures of Tuta Absoluta Moths (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING (IJESE) Vol. 3: 43- 48 http://www.pvamu.edu/texged Prairie View A&M University, Texas, USA Effect of trap color on captures of Tuta absoluta moths (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Taha, A. M.1; Homam B. H.1; Afsah, A. F. E.1 and Fatma. M. EL-Sharkawy2 1- Vegetable Pests Department, Plant Protection Research Institute, A.R.C., Egypt. 2- Photometry Department, National Institute of Standards, Egypt. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History Field experiments were conducted to determine the attractive action of Received: Jan. 11, 2012 different colors (red, yellow, green, and blue) to Tuta absoluta moths and Accepted: March 5, 2012 to asses the influence of trap color on their capture moths in sex Available online: July 2012 pheromone baited traps. _________________ The results demonstrate that T. absoluta moths can distinguish between Keywords: colors, where the red sticky traps with 39.7% reflectance at 612.1 nm Tuta absoluta dominant wavelength caught the greatest number of moths, recording Lepidoptera Moths 46.89% of the total moths captured, while the yellow sticky traps caught Trap color the fewest number of moths recording only 13.99 %. Delta and water pan Sex pheromone traps of red color baited with commercial sex pheromone captured 1.58 and 1.52 times, respectively more male T. absoluta moths than such traps of yellow color baited with the same sex pheromone. The results demonstrate that the red color can be used to enhance the effectiveness of sex pheromone traps for capturing male T. absoluta moths. Further research is recommended for better understanding of the effect of trap color on the diversity and abundance of non target insects captured.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuta Absoluta, the South American Tomato Leafminer
    ANR Publication 8589 | January 2018 http://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu Tuta Absoluta, The South American Tomato Leafminer he South American tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta TMeyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), is a serious and devastating pest of fresh market and processing tomatoes (fig. 1). Tuta absoluta, or Tuta, as it is also known, is thought to be native to South America. Currently, Tuta can be found in South America, southern Central America, southern Europe, northern Africa, the Middle East, and in localized parts of India (CABI 2016). Tuta is continuing to spread throughout the tomato-growing areas of the world (Desneux et al. 2010). Although it has not been reported in California or elsewhere in the United States, computer Figure 1. Tuta damage. Photo: J. Arno. KRIS GODFREY, University of models that are used to match the life history of an invasive California, Davis, Contained pest with climate and availability of host plants have predicted that Tuta has a moderate Research Facility; likelihood of establishing in the commercial tomato-growing regions of California, FRANK ZALOM, University of Arizona, and the southern United States (USDA 2011). California, Davis, Department of Entomology and Nematology; Tuta absoluta bores into tomato leaves, stems, flowers, apical buds, and fruit, resulting in less fruit set, poor plant and JOANNA CHIU, University of structure, and unmarketable fruit. Crop losses can be as high as 80 to 100 percent, and insecticide costs may California, Davis, Department of dramatically increase due to the need for additional insecticide applications (Lopez 1991; Estay 2000; Torres et al. Entomology and Nematology ANR Publication 8589 | Tuta Absoluta, The South American Tomato Leafminer | January 2018 | 2 2001; Desneux et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuta Absoluta
    EuropeanBlackwell Publishing, Ltd. and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization Organisation Européenne et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes Data sheets on quarantine pests Fiches informatives sur les organismes de quarantaine Tuta absoluta attacking Solanum lyratum in Japan (Clarke, 1962) but no Identity recent records Name: Tuta absoluta Povolny EU: absent Synonyms: Scrobipalpuloides absoluta Povolny, Scrobipalpula absoluta Povolny, Gnorimoschema absoluta Clarke, Phthorimaea Biology absoluta Meyrick Taxonomic position: Insecta: Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae T. absoluta has a high reproductive potential. Larvae do not enter Common names: tomato borer, South American tomato moth, diapause as long as food is available, and there may be 10–12 tomato leaf miner, South American tomato pinworm (English); generations per year (5 in Argentina). The biological cycle is polilla del tomate, polilla perforadora, cogollero del tomate, completed in 29 – 38 days depending on environmental conditions. gusano minador del tomate, minador de hojas y tallos de la papa Studies in Chile have shown that development takes 76.3 days (Spanish); traça-do-tomateiro (Portuguese) at 14°C, 39.8 at 19.7°C and 23.8 at 27.1°C (Barrientos et al., Note on taxonomy and nomenclature: Tuta absoluta was 1998). Adults are nocturnal and usually hide during the day originally described as Phthorimaea absoluta (Meyrick, 1917). between leaves. Females lay eggs on aerial parts of their host plants The genus was successively changed to Gnorimoschema and a single female can lay a total of about 260 eggs during its (1962) and Scrobipalpula (1964). This species was later placed lifetime. Four larval instars develop. In Argentina, young larvae in a new genus, Scrobipalpuloides (in 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Feeding in Adult Gelechiidae Moth Tuta Absoluta (Meyrick, 1917)
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS Unusual Feeding in Adult Gelechiidae Moth Tuta Absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) Raul BAETAN 1 1 2 2* 1 , Ion OLTEAN , Rocco ADDANTE , Francesco PORCELLI 2 Departamentul de Protecţia Plantelor, Facultatea de Agricultură, Universitatea de Știinţe Agricole și Medicină Veterinară Cluj – Napoca, Romania Dipartimento di [email protected] del Suolo, della Pianta e degli Alimenti (DiSSPA – UNIBA Aldo Moro Sez. Entomologia e Zoologia, Bari, Italy * corresponding author: Bulletin USAMV series Agriculture 72(1)/2015 Print ISSN 1843-5246; Electronic ISSN 1843-5386 DOI 10.15835/buasvmcn-agr: 11144 ABSTRACT Introduction: The tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta T. absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) is a key pest for solanaceous crops, mostly tomato and potato, in many areas of the World. Aims: In this study we present evidences that adults, both males and females, feed on tomato leaves by proboscis. Materials and Methods: Observation were given by a digital camera-equipped stereoscope and confirmed by a Cryo-SEM. Results: We describe and illustrate the adult feeding behaviour and the consequent wounds and scars on the leaves. Discussion and conclusions: A discussion aboutKeywords: the role of adultthis unusual feeding, behaviour solanaceous in crops,tomato Tuta leafminer absoluta. biology is given. INTRODUCTION Tuta absoluta , an invasive pest originated by a Zeiss Universal compound microscope, a Zeiss from Southet America al., is able toet destroy al., tomato Tessovar macro system and a Hitachi TM3000 crops in open field and greenhouses in several Cryo-SEM.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION days (Filho 2000; Gomide 200l). Until T. absoluta now it was considered that only tomato leafminer larvae could feed on plant tissues but this study The proboscis of is about 1.4 mm provesMATERIANLS that also adults AND are METHODS able to feed on leaves.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuta Absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Thermal Requirements and Effect of Temperature on Development, Survival, Reproduction and Longevity
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(4): 658–663, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.103 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): Thermal requirements and effect of temperature on development, survival, reproduction and longevity FLAVIA DA SILVA KRECHEMER and LUIS AMILTON FOERSTER Department of Zoology, Federal University of Paraná, P.O. Box 19.020, 81531-990 Curitiba, PR, Brazil; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Key words. Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae, Tuta absoluta, tomato leafminer, degree-day, thermal requirements, fertility Abstract. Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917) is the main pest of tomato crops in South America. Recently, it was also reported in several countries in Europe and the Middle East. Because of its invasive potential and the lack of information on the biology of T. absoluta, the present study aimed to estimate its thermal requirements and evaluate the effect of temperature on its development, survival, reproduc- tion and longevity. The experiments were carried out at constant temperatures of 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30°C. T. absoluta completed its development at all these temperatures. The thermal requirements were estimated by linear regression; the insects required 416.7 degree- days to complete the cycle from egg to adult, and the lower temperature threshold was estimated to be 8.0°C. The upper temperature threshold estimated for the egg-adult cycle was 37.3°C. The pre-oviposition period was longer at 10°C, but the oviposition period was similar at all the temperatures tested. Fecundity was highest at 20 and 25°C, with averages of 134.8 and 149.1 eggs per female, respec- tively.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuta Absoluta5-5-2011.Pdf
    FOR INFORMATION DA-2011-26 May 5, 2011 SUBJECT: Federal Import Quarantine Order for Host Materials of Tomato Leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) TO: STATE AND TERRITORY AGRICULTURAL REGULATORY OFFICIALS This Federal Order replaces SPRO#: DA-2011-12, dated March 9, 2011, and updates the trapping requirements for tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta, for detection and surveillance. Pursuant to this Federal Order, T. absoluta host material from affected countries must meet the conditions below. This Federal Order is effective May 5, 2011. This Federal Order amends the current trapping requirements by reducing the minimum trapping rate of 30 traps per hectare to 5 traps per hectare because new research indicates that a minimum of 5 traps per hectare is sufficient to detect Tuta absoluta in the pest exclusionary structures. APHIS will require that shipments of tomato fruit from countries where the tomato leafminer is known to occur meet additional import requirements to prevent the introduction and establishment of T. absoluta. Those requirements are described in detail in the attached Federal Order. APHIS will prohibit the entry of plants for planting of Solanum spp., Datura spp. and Nicotiana spp., which are also hosts of T. absoluta, from countries where the tomato leafminer is known to occur pending the completion of a Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) and the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. For additional information regarding this Federal Order, please contact Phillip B. Grove, Regulatory Coordination Specialist/PPQ at (301) 734-6280, or via email at [email protected]. /s/ Rebecca A. Bech Rebecca A. Bech Deputy Administrator Plant Protection and Quarantine Attachment: Federal Order FEDERAL ORDER Tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) May 5, 2011 The purpose of this Federal Order is to prevent the entry or introduction of the harmful plant pest, the tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick, 1917), from foreign countries into the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomato Breeding for Sustainable Crop Systems: High Levels of Zingiberene Providing Resistance to Multiple Arthropods
    horticulturae Article Tomato Breeding for Sustainable Crop Systems: High Levels of Zingiberene Providing Resistance to Multiple Arthropods João Ronaldo Freitas de Oliveira 1 , Juliano Tadeu Vilela de Resende 2 , Renato Barros de Lima Filho 1 , Sergio Ruffo Roberto 2,* , Paulo Roberto da Silva 3 , Caroline Rech 1 and Cristiane Nardi 1 1 Department of Agronomy, Midwestern State University, Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá 03, Vila Carli, Guarapuava, Paraná ZIP 85040-080, Brazil; [email protected] (J.R.F.d.O.); delimafi[email protected] (R.B.d.L.F.); [email protected] (C.R.); [email protected] (C.N.) 2 Agricultural Research Center, Londrina State University, Celso Garcia Cid Road, km 380, P.O. Box 10.011, Londrina ZIP 86057-970, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Genetics and Plant Molecular Biology Laboratory, Midwestern State University, Simeão Camargo Varela de Sá 03, Vila Carli, Guarapuava, Paraná ZIP 85040-080, Brazil; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 April 2020; Accepted: 29 May 2020; Published: 5 June 2020 Abstract: In sustainable cropping systems, the management of herbivorous arthropods is a challenge for the high performance of the tomato crop. One way to reduce the damage caused by these pests is the use of resistant cultivars within a sustainable integrated management system. The host selection of Tetranychus urticae, Bemisia tabaci, and Tuta absoluta was evaluated, characterizing their preference among the tomato genotypes RVTZ2011-79-503-143, RVTZ2011-79-335-164, RVTZ2011-79-185-250 (high zingiberene content—HZC), and RVTZ2011-79-117-273 (low zingiberene content—LZC). Such genotypes were selected in the F2BC2 generation (the F2 generation of the 2th backcross towards Solanum lycopersicum after the inicial interspecific cross S.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Cases of Diamide-Resistant Tuta Absoluta (Meyrick) and the Alternation of the Insecticidal Modes of Action As a Key IPM Practice for Sustainable Control
    The first cases of diamide-resistant Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) and the alternation of the insecticidal modes of action as a key IPM practice for sustainable control. Andrea Bassi1, Emmanouil Roditakis2, Wilbert G. Flier3 1 DuPont de Nemours Italiana S.r.l., Via P. Gobetti 2/C, 20063 Cernusco S.N. (MI), Italy; 2 Institute of Olive Tree, Subtropical Crops and Viticulture, Hellenic Agricultural Organization –NAGREF, Heraklion Greece; 3 DuPont de Nemours (Nederland) B.V., Baanhoekweg 22, 3313LA Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Abstract: This paper reports on the sensitivity monitoring executed by DuPont and collaborators in Italy, Spain, Greece since 2009 in order to detect possible sensitivity shifts of T. absoluta from baseline sensitivity to the diamide insecticide chlorantraniliprole1 (MoA group 28). The results of the 2014 bioassays revealed the first cases of T. absoluta resistance to diamide insecticides in South-East Sicily. The resistant strains feature high resistance ratios vs. sensitive strains. Unpublished molecular and inheritance studies suggest target-site mutation as the likely resistance mechanism. On-farm interviews have highlighted consistent and widespread abuse of chlorantraniliprole-based products over the last 5-6 years, with growers not respecting product label directions for use and neglecting good agricultural practices including IPM. In this paper, potential integrated control strategies are discussed, aiming to prevent further directional selection of resistance alleles via the adoption of stringent IPM strategies inclusive of reasoned IRM/MoA alternation programmes. Key words (and abbreviations): integrated pest management (IPM), insecticide resistance management (IRM), insecticide resistance action committee (IRAC), mode of action (MoA), ryanodine receptor (RyR), diamide insecticides, resistance ratio (RR), chlorantraniliprole, flubendiamide, Tuta absoluta.
    [Show full text]
  • Dichotomous Key to Gelechiid Larvae
    KEY TO SEPARATE NATIVE AND QUARANTINE SIGNIFICANT SPECIES OF GELECHIIDAE FEEDING ON SOLANACEAE IN FLORIDA AND THE GULF COAST REGION Steven Passoa and Jim Young Passoa (2007) illustrated identification characters of some exotic Lepidoptera of quarantine significance to the southern United States. As pointed out by Hodges (1998), little information exists on the immature stages of the Gelechioidea and very few vouchers document these life cycles. This lack of material prevented Passoa (2007) from treating the family Gelechiidae at the species level. Here we present a key to separate some native and quarantine significant species of Gelechiidae feeding on Solanaceae in Florida and the Gulf Coast Region. Identification of the pest species is often difficult; in particular, there is a need to distinguish Tuta absoluta from Keiferia lycopersicella (Povolny 1975: 392). Larval terminology follows Stehr (1987). The definition of "outer tooth" (called an extra tooth by Benander 1937) follows Passoa (1985). This key is made for late instar larvae; early instars may not be identifiable. Characters used in the key were taken from Capps (1946), Keifer (1936, 1937), Povolny (1973), Schnitzler et al. (2012), USDA (1973) and Weisman (1986). A few discrepancies in the literature are discussed in the caveat section below. The characters in the couplets are ordered from the head to abdomen for ease of viewing. The number of teeth on the mandible is subject to wear, and the last (fifth) tooth is especially small and easily missed if worn. Typically, gelechiid larvae are recognized by having the following combination of characters: a trisetose prespiracular group, L1 and L2 closely spaced below the spiracle on A3-6, a bisetose SV group on A1, a trisetose SV group on A3-6, and A9 with the D and SD setae each on a separate pinaculum (Capps 1946).
    [Show full text]
  • Gelechiidae Biosecurity Occurrence Background Subfamilies Short
    Ardozyga stratifera (Gelechiinae) Gelechiidae Twirler Moths or Gelechiid Moths Biosecurity BIOSECURITY ALERT This Family is of Biosecurity Concern Occurrence This family occurs in Australia. Background The micromoth family Gelechiidae is the namesake family for the enormous superfamily Gelechioidea and is one of the most diverse families of the Lepidoptera. Gelechiids are very small moths with narrow wings. The family has a worldwide distribution and is diverse with over 4,700 known species in 500 genera, but that number would be at least doubled with undescribed and new species. The family is particularly prevalent in North America because of the close association of species with Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga). The caterpillars have very diverse feeding habits on many plant parts and species. Many species are external feeders but are protected by a shelter of some kind, often in tied or rolled leaves (Fig. 1). Many others feed internally, boring into flower heads, stems (Fig. 2) or roots. They are leaf-miners (Fig. 11), gall-inducers or stem-borers, or feed within flowers or fruits (Fig. 13). They also can be concealed in silken tunnels in earth or in portable cases. Not surprisingly, therefore, there are many gelechiids that are agricultural pests, such as: the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Fig. 13), one of the most destructive pests of cotton in the world; Sitotroga cerealella (Angoumois grain moth); Phthorimaea operculella (potato tuber moth); and, Tuta absoluta (tomato leaf miner). Contrastingly, several species have been used as biocontrol agents against weeds. One Australian species feeds on dead leaf litter. Fig. 1. Mature caterpillar of the widespread Australian gelechiid Ardozyga stratifera (Gelechiinae).
    [Show full text]