DOCSLIB.ORG

Notes on Category Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notes on Category Theory Notes on Category Theory Robert L. Knighten November 9, 2007 c 2004{2007 by Robert L. Knighten All rights reserved Preface There are many fine articles, notes, and books on category theory, so what is the excuse for publishing yet another tome on the subject. My initial excuse was altruistic, a student asked for help in learning the subject and none of the available sources was quite appropriate. But ultimately I recognized the personal and selfish desire to produce my own exposition of the subject. Despite that I have some hope that other students of the subject will find these notes useful. Target Audience & Prerequisites Category theory can sensibly be studied at many levels. Lawvere and Schanuel in their book Conceptual Mathematics [47] have provided an intro- duction to categories assuming very little background in mathematics, while Mac Lane's Categories for the Working Mathematician is an introduction to categories for those who already have a substantial knowledge of other parts of mathematics. These notes are targeted to a student with significant \math- ematical sophistication" and a modest amount of specific knowledge. The sophistication is primarily an ease with the definition-theorem-proof style of mathematical exposition, being comfortable with an axiomatic approach, and finding particular pleasure in exploring unexpected connections even with un- familiar parts of mathematics Assumed Background: The critical specific knowledge assumed is a basic understanding of set theory. This includes such notions as subsets, unions and intersections of sets, ordered pairs, Cartesian products, relations, and functions as relations. An understanding of particular types of functions, particularly bi- jections, injections, surjections and the associated notions of direct and inverse images of subsets is also important. Other kinds of relations are important as well, particularly equivalence relations and order relations. The basic ideas regarding finite and infinite sets, cardinal and ordinal numbers and induction will also be used. All of this material is outlined in Appendix A on informal axiomatic set theory, but this is not likely to be useful as a first exposure to set theory. Although not strictly required some minimal understanding of elementary group theory or basic linear algebra will certainly make parts of the text much easier to understand. There are many examples scattered through the text which require some knowledge of other and occasionally quite advanced parts of mathematics. In iii iv PREFACE particular Appendix B (Catalog of Categories) contains a discussion of a large variety of specific categories. These typically assume some detailed knowledge of some parts of mathematics. None of these examples are required for under- standing the body of the notes, but are included primarily for those readers who do have such knowledge and secondarily to encourage readers to explore other areas of mathematics. Notation: The rigorous development of axiomatic set theory requires a very precise specification of the language and logic that is used. As part of that there is some concise notation that has become common in much of mathematics and which will be used throughout these notes. Occasionally, often in descriptions of sets, we will use various symbols from sentential logic particularly logical conjunction ^ for \and", logical disjunction _ for \or", implication ) for \implies" and logical equivalence () for \if and only if". We also use 8 and 9 from existential logic with 8 meaning \for all" and 9 meaning \there exists". Here is an example of the usage: For any sets A and B 8A 8B; A + B = fx :(x 2 A ^ x2 = B) _ (x2 = A ^ x 2 B)g from which we conclude 8A 8B; A + B = A ) A \ B = ; We have adopted two of Halmos' fine notational conventions here as well: the use of “iff" when precision demands \if and only if" while felicity asks for less; and the end (or absence) of a proof is marked with . Note on the Exercises There are 170 exercises in these notes, freely interspersed in the text. A list of the exercises is included in the front matter, just after the list of definitions. Although the main purpose of the exercises is to develop your skill working with the concepts and techniques of category theory, the results in the exercises are also an integral part of our development. Solutions to all of the exercises are provided in Appendix C, and you should understand them. If you have any doubt about your own solution, you should read the solution in the Appendix before continuing on with the text. If you find an error in the text, in the solutions, or just have a better solution, please send your comments to the author at [email protected]. They will be much appreciated. Alternative Sources There are many useful accounts of the material in these notes, and the study of category theory benefits from this variety of perspectives. In Appendix D are included brief reviews of the various books and notes, along with an indication of their contents. Throughout these Notes specific references are included for alternative dis- cussions of the material being treated, but no attempt has been made to provide attribution to original sources. Contents Preface iii Contents v List of Definitions xii List of Exercises xix Introduction 1 I Mathematics in Categories 3 I.1 What is a Category? . 3 I.1.1 Hom and Related Notation . 6 I.1.2 Subcategories . 8 I.1.3 Recognizing Categories . 9 I.2 Special Morphisms . 10 I.2.1 Isomorphisms . 11 I.2.2 Sections and Retracts . 12 I.2.3 Epimorphisms and Monomorphisms . 13 I.2.4 Subobjects and Quotient Objects . 20 I.3 Special Objects . 23 I.3.1 Products and Sums . 23 I.3.2 Final, Initial and Zero Objects . 36 I.3.3 Direct Sums and Matrices . 39 I.4 Algebraic Objects . 46 I.4.1 Magmas in a Category . 47 I.4.2 Comagmas in a Category . 50 I.4.2.1 Comagmas and Magmas Together . 53 I.4.3 Monoids in a Category . 56 I.4.4 Comonoids in a Category . 61 I.4.5 Groups in a Category . 64 II Constructing Categories 69 II.1 Duality and Dual Category . 69 II.2 Quotient Categories . 72 v vi Contents II.3 Product of Categories . 73 II.4 Sum of Categories . 74 II.5 Concrete and Based Categories . 74 II.6 Morphism Categories . 76 III Functors and Natural Transformations 79 III.1 What is a Functor? . 79 III.2 Examples of Functors . 82 III.2.1 Subcategories and Inclusion Functors . 82 III.2.2 Quotient Categories and Quotient Functors . 82 III.2.3 Product of Categories and Projection Functors . 82 III.2.4 Sum of Categories and Injection Functors . 83 III.2.5 Constant Functors . 84 III.2.6 Forgetful Functors . 85 III.2.7 The Product Functor . 85 III.2.8 The Sum Bifunctor . 86 III.2.9 Power Set Functor . 86 III.2.10 Monoid Homomorphisms are Functors . 86 III.2.11 Forgetful Functor for Monoid . 87 III.2.12 Free Monoid Functor . 87 III.2.13 Polynomial Ring as Functor . 88 III.2.14 Commutator Functor . 88 III.2.15 Abelianizer: Groups Made Abelian . 88 III.2.16 Discrete Topological Space Functor . 89 III.2.17 The Lie Algebra of a Lie Group . 90 III.2.18 Homology Theory . 90 III.3 Categories of Categories . 90 III.4 Digraphs and Free Categories . 92 III.5 Natural Transformations . 96 III.6 Examples of Natural Transformations . 98 III.6.1 Dual Vector Spaces . 98 III.6.2 Free Monoid Functor . 98 III.6.3 Commutator and Abelianizer . 99 III.6.4 The Discrete Topology and the Forgetful Functor . 100 III.6.5 The Godement Calculus . 101 III.6.6 Functor Categories . 102 III.6.7 Examples of Functor Categories . 102 III.6.8 Discrete Dynamical Systems . 104 IV Constructing Categories - Part II 107 IV.1 Comma Categories . 107 V Universal Mapping Properties 111 V.1 Universal Elements . 112 V.2 Universal Arrows . 114 V.3 Representable Functors . 114 Contents vii V.4 Initial and Final Objects . 115 V.4.1 Free Objects . 116 V.5 Limits and Colimits . 117 V.5.1 Cones and Limits . 121 V.5.2 Cocones and Colimits . 130 V.5.3 Complete Categories . 136 V.6 Adjoint Functors . 136 V.7 Kan Extensions . 145 V.7.1 Ends and Coends . 145 VI More Mathematics in a Category 147 VI.1 Relations In Categories . 147 VII Algebraic Categories 151 VII.1 Universal Algebra . 152 VII.2 Algebraic Theories . 152 VII.3 Internal Categories . 152 VIII Cartesian Closed Categories 155 VIII.1 Partial Equivalence Relations and Modest Sets . 155 IX Topoi 161 X The Category of Sets Reconsidered 163 XI Monoidal Categories 165 XII Enriched Category Theory 167 XIII Additive and Abelian Categories 169 XIV Homological Algebra 171 XIV.1 Introduction . 171 XIV.2 Additive Categories . 171 XIV.3 Abelian Categories . 171 XIV.4 Ext and Tor . 171 XIV.5 Category of Complexes . 171 XIV.6 Triangulated Categories . 171 XIV.7 Derived Categories . 171 XIV.8 Derived Functors . 171 XV 2-Categories 173 XVI Fibered Categories 175 Appendices 177 A Set Theory 179 viii Contents A.1 Extension Axiom . 180 A.2 Axiom of Specification . 181 A.2.1 Boolean Algebra of Classes . 182 A.3 Power-set Axiom . 185 A.4 Axiom of Pairs . 186 A.5 Union Axiom . 187 A.6 Ordered Pairs and Cartesian Products . 188 A.7 Relations . 190 A.8 Functions . 194 A.8.1 Families and Cartesian Products . 197 A.8.2 Images . 199 A.9 Natural Numbers . 199 A.10 Peano Axioms . 202 A.11 Arithmetic . 206 A.12 Order . 209 A.13 Number Systems .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 10. Algebra Theories II 10.1 Essentially Algebraic Theory Idea: A
    Page 1 of 7 10. Algebra Theories II 10.1 essentially algebraic theory Idea: A mathematical structure is essentially algebraic if its definition involves partially defined operations satisfying equational laws, where the domain of any given operation is a subset where various other operations happen to be equal. An actual algebraic theory is one where all operations are total functions. The most familiar example may be the (strict) notion of category: a small category consists of a set C0of objects, a set C1 of morphisms, source and target maps s,t:C1→C0 and so on, but composition is only defined for pairs of morphisms where the source of one happens to equal the target of the other. Essentially algebraic theories can be understood through category theory at least when they are finitary, so that all operations have only finitely many arguments. This gives a generalization of Lawvere theories, which describe finitary algebraic theories. As the domains of the operations are given by the solutions to equations, they may be understood using the notion of equalizer. So, just as a Lawvere theory is defined using a category with finite products, a finitary essentially algebraic theory is defined using a category with finite limits — or in other words, finite products and also equalizers (from which all other finite limits, including pullbacks, may be derived). Definition As alluded to above, the most concise and elegant definition is through category theory. The traditional definition is this: Definition. An essentially algebraic theory or finite limits theory is a category that is finitely complete, i.e., has all finite limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Exercise Sheet
    Exercises on Higher Categories Paolo Capriotti and Nicolai Kraus Midlands Graduate School, April 2017 Our course should be seen as a very first introduction to the idea of higher categories. This exercise sheet is a guide for the topics that we discuss in our four lectures, and some exercises simply consist of recalling or making precise concepts and constructions discussed in the lectures. The notion of a higher category is not one which has a single clean def- inition. There are numerous different approaches, of which we can only discuss a tiny fraction. In general, a very good reference is the nLab at https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/HomePage. Apart from that, a very incomplete list for suggested further reading is the following (all available online). For an overview over many approaches: – Eugenia Cheng and Aaron Lauda, Higher-Dimensional Categories: an illustrated guide book available online, cheng.staff.shef.ac.uk/guidebook Introductions to simplicial sets: – Greg Friedman, An Elementary Illustrated Introduction to Simplicial Sets very gentle introduction, arXiv:0809.4221. – Emily Riehl, A Leisurely Introduction to Simplicial Sets a slightly more advanced introduction, www.math.jhu.edu/~eriehl/ssets.pdf Quasicategories: – Jacob Lurie, Higher Topos Theory available as paperback (ISBN-10: 0691140499) and online, arXiv:math/0608040 Operads (not discussed in our lectures): – Tom Leinster, Higher Operads, Higher Categories available as paperback (ISBN-10: 0521532159) and online, 1 arXiv:math/0305049 Note: Exercises are ordered by topic and can be done in any order, unless an exercise explicitly refers to a previous one. We recommend to do the exercises marked with an arrow ⇒ first.
    [Show full text]
  • Change of Base for Locally Internal Categories
    Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 61 (1989) 233-242 233 North-Holland CHANGE OF BASE FOR LOCALLY INTERNAL CATEGORIES Renato BETTI Universitb di Torino, Dipartimento di Matematica, via Principe Amedeo 8, IO123 Torino, Italy Communicated by G.M. Kelly Received 4 August 1988 Locally internal categories over an elementary topos 9 are regarded as categories enriched in the bicategory Span g. The change of base is considered with respect to a geometric morphism S-r 8. Cocompleteness is preserved, and the topos S can be regarded as a cocomplete, locally internal category over 6. This allows one in particular to prove an analogue of Diaconescu’s theorem in terms of general properties of categories. Introduction Locally internal categories over a topos & can be regarded as categories enriched in the bicategory Span& and in many cases their properties can be usefully dealt with in terms of standard notions of enriched category theory. From this point of view Betti and Walters [2,3] study completeness, ends, functor categories, and prove an adjoint functor theorem. Here we consider a change of the base topos, i.e. a geometric morphismp : 9-t CF. In particular 9 itself can be regarded as locally internal over 8. Again, properties of p can be expressed by the enrichment (both in Spangand in Span 8) and the relevant module calculus of enriched category theory applies directly to most calculations. Our notion of locally internal category is equivalent to that given by Lawvere [6] under the name of large category with an &-atlas, and to Benabou’s locally small fibrations [l].
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL ALGEBRA V: 2-GROUPS 1. Introduction
    Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 12, No. 14, 2004, pp. 423–491. HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL ALGEBRA V: 2-GROUPS JOHN C. BAEZ AND AARON D. LAUDA Abstract. A 2-group is a ‘categorified’ version of a group, in which the underlying set G has been replaced by a category and the multiplication map m: G × G → G has been replaced by a functor. Various versions of this notion have already been explored; our goal here is to provide a detailed introduction to two, which we call ‘weak’ and ‘coherent’ 2-groups. A weak 2-group is a weak monoidal category in which every morphism has an ∼ ∼ inverse and every object x has a ‘weak inverse’: an object y such that x ⊗ y = 1 = y ⊗ x. A coherent 2-group is a weak 2-group in which every object x is equipped with a specified weak inversex ¯ and isomorphisms ix:1→ x⊗x¯, ex:¯x⊗x → 1 forming an adjunction. We describe 2-categories of weak and coherent 2-groups and an ‘improvement’ 2-functor that turns weak 2-groups into coherent ones, and prove that this 2-functor is a 2-equivalence of 2-categories. We internalize the concept of coherent 2-group, which gives a quick way to define Lie 2-groups. We give a tour of examples, including the ‘fundamental 2-group’ of a space and various Lie 2-groups. We also explain how coherent 2-groups can be classified in terms of 3rd cohomology classes in group cohomology. Finally, using this classification, we construct for any connected and simply-connected compact simple Lie group G a family of 2-groups G ( ∈ Z)havingG as its group of objects and U(1) as the group of automorphisms of its identity object.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Dimensional Algebra VI: Lie 2-Algebra
    Mathematics Faculty Works Mathematics 2004 Higher Dimensional Algebra VI: Lie 2-Algebra John C. Baez University of California, Riverside Alissa S. Crans Loyola Marymount University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/math_fac Part of the Algebra Commons Recommended Citation Baez, J. and Crans, A. “Higher Dimensional Algebra VI: Lie 2-Algebras.” Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 12 (2004): 492 – 538. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mathematics at Digital Commons @ Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 12, No. 15, 2004, pp. 492{538. HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL ALGEBRA VI: LIE 2-ALGEBRAS JOHN C. BAEZ AND ALISSA S. CRANS Abstract. The theory of Lie algebras can be categorified starting from a new notion of `2-vector space', which we define as an internal category in Vect. There is a 2- category 2Vect having these 2-vector spaces as objects, `linear functors' as morphisms and `linear natural transformations' as 2-morphisms. We define a `semistrict Lie 2- algebra' to be a 2-vector space L equipped with a skew-symmetric bilinear functor [·; ·]: L×L ! L satisfying the Jacobi identity up to a completely antisymmetric trilinear natural transformation called the `Jacobiator', which in turn must satisfy a certain law of its own. This law is closely related to the Zamolodchikov tetrahedron equation, and indeed we prove that any semistrict Lie 2-algebra gives a solution of this equation, just as any Lie algebra gives a solution of the Yang{Baxter equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Apr 0 8 2011
    From manifolds to invariants of En-algebras MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE by OF TECHNIOLOGY Ricardo Andrade APR 08 2011 Licenciatura, Instituto Superior Tecnico (2005) LjBRARIES Submitted to the Department of Mathematics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ARCHIVEs at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2010 @ Ricardo Andrade, MMX. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit http: //creativecommons .org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Author .......... Department of Mathematics August 24, 2010 Certified by.... Haynes R. Miller Professor of Mathematics Thesis Supervisor 7) Accepted by ... 6$, Bjorn Poonen Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students From manifolds to invariants of En-algebras by Ricardo Andrade Submitted to the Department of Mathematics on August 24, 2010, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Abstract This thesis is the first step in an investigation of an interesting class of invariants of En-algebras which generalize topological Hochschild homology. The main goal of this thesis is to simply give a definition of those invariants. We define PROPs EG, for G a structure group sitting over GL(n, R). Given a manifold with a (tangential) G-structure, we define functors 0 EG[M]: (EG) -+ Top constructed out of spaces of G-augmented embeddings of disjoint unions of euclidean spaces into M. These spaces are modifications to the usual spaces of embeddings of manifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNAL CATEGORIES, ANAFUNCTORS and LOCALISATIONS in Memory of Luanne Palmer (1965-2011)
    Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 26, No. 29, 2012, pp. 788{829. INTERNAL CATEGORIES, ANAFUNCTORS AND LOCALISATIONS In memory of Luanne Palmer (1965-2011) DAVID MICHAEL ROBERTS Abstract. In this article we review the theory of anafunctors introduced by Makkai and Bartels, and show that given a subcanonical site S, one can form a bicategorical localisation of various 2-categories of internal categories or groupoids at weak equivalences using anafunctors as 1-arrows. This unifies a number of proofs throughout the literature, using the fewest assumptions possible on S. 1. Introduction It is a well-known classical result of category theory that a functor is an equivalence (that is, in the 2-category of categories) if and only if it is fully faithful and essentially surjective. This fact is equivalent to the axiom of choice. It is therefore not true if one is working with categories internal to a category S which doesn't satisfy the (external) axiom of choice. This is may fail even in a category very much like the category of sets, such as a well-pointed boolean topos, or even the category of sets in constructive foundations. As internal categories are the objects of a 2-category Cat(S) we can talk about internal equivalences, and even fully faithful functors. In the case S has a singleton pretopology J (i.e. covering families consist of single maps) we can define an analogue of essentially surjective functors. Internal functors which are fully faithful and essentially surjective are called weak equivalences in the literature, going back to [Bunge-Par´e1979].
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Internal Categories
    Complete Internal Categories Enrico Ghiorzi∗ April 2020 Internal categories feature notions of limit and completeness, as originally proposed in the context of the effective topos. This paper sets out the theory of internal completeness in a general context, spelling out the details of the definitions of limit and completeness and clarifying some subtleties. Remarkably, complete internal categories are also cocomplete and feature a suitable version of the adjoint functor theorem. Such results are understood as consequences of the intrinsic smallness of internal categories. Contents Introduction 2 1 Background 3 1.1 Internal Categories . .3 1.2 Exponentials of Internal Categories . .9 2 Completeness of Internal Categories 12 2.1 Diagrams and Cones . 12 2.2 Limits . 14 2.3 Completeness . 17 2.4 Special Limits . 20 2.5 Completeness and Cocompleteness . 22 arXiv:2004.08741v1 [math.CT] 19 Apr 2020 2.6 Adjoint Functor Theorem . 25 References 32 ∗Research funded by Cambridge Trust and EPSRC. 1 Introduction Introduction It is a remarkable feature of the effective topos [Hyl82] to contain a small subcategory, the category of modest sets, which is in some sense complete. That such a category should exist was originally suggested by Eugenio Moggi as a way to understand how realizability toposes give rise to models for impredicative polymorphism, and concrete versions of such models already appeared in [Gir72]. The sense in which the category of modest sets is complete is a delicate matter which, among other aspects of the situation, is considered in [HRR90]. This notion of (strong) completeness is related in a reasonably straightforward way—using the externalization of an internal category—to the established notion for indexed categories [PS78].
    [Show full text]
  • Higher Categories Student Seminar
    Higher categories student seminar Peter Teichner and Chris Schommer-Pries Contents 0 Introduction { Peter Teichner and Chris Schommer-Pries 2 0.1 Part 1: Lower higher categories { Peter . .2 0.1.1 Motivation 1: Higher categories show up everywhere . .2 0.1.2 Motivation 2: The homotopy hypothesis . .4 0.2 Part 2: Higher higher categories { Chris . .5 0.2.1 Broad outline and motivation . .5 0.2.2 Detailed outline . .6 1 Strict n-categories and their classifying spaces { Lars Borutzky 6 1.1 Strict n-categories, left Kan extensions, and nerves of 1-categories . .6 1.2 Higher nerve functors . .8 1.3 Examples of higher categories . .9 2 Strictification of weak 2-categories { Arik Wilbert 10 2.1 Motivation . 10 2.2 The theorem . 11 2.2.1 The definitions . 11 2.2.2 The proof . 13 2.3 Correction from previous lecture . 14 3 2-groupoids and 2-types { Malte Pieper 15 3.1 Motivation . 15 3.2 What's a 2-group? . 15 3.3 Classify 2-groups! . 16 3.4 2-types/equivalence $ 2-groups/equivalence . 17 3.5 Addendum (handout): Classification of homotopy 2-types: Some basic definitions . 19 4 No strict 3-groupoid models the 2-sphere { Daniel Br¨ugmann 21 4.1 Outline . 21 4.2 The homotopy groups of groupoids . 22 4.3 The auxiliary result . 23 5 Complete Segal spaces and Segal categories { Alexander K¨orschgen 24 1 5.1 Definitions . 24 5.2 Groupoids . 26 5.3 Relation with n-Types ........................................ 26 5.4 Examples . 27 6 Examples and problems with weak n-categories { Kim Nguyen 27 6.1 Background .
    [Show full text]
  • Higher-Dimensional Algebra Vi: Lie 2-Algebras
    Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 12, No. 15, 2004, pp. 492{538. HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL ALGEBRA VI: LIE 2-ALGEBRAS JOHN C. BAEZ AND ALISSA S. CRANS Abstract. The theory of Lie algebras can be categorified starting from a new notion of `2-vector space', which we define as an internal category in Vect. There is a 2- category 2Vect having these 2-vector spaces as objects, `linear functors' as morphisms and `linear natural transformations' as 2-morphisms. We define a `semistrict Lie 2- algebra' to be a 2-vector space L equipped with a skew-symmetric bilinear functor [·; ·]: L×L ! L satisfying the Jacobi identity up to a completely antisymmetric trilinear natural transformation called the `Jacobiator', which in turn must satisfy a certain law of its own. This law is closely related to the Zamolodchikov tetrahedron equation, and indeed we prove that any semistrict Lie 2-algebra gives a solution of this equation, just as any Lie algebra gives a solution of the Yang{Baxter equation. We construct a 2- category of semistrict Lie 2-algebras and prove that it is 2-equivalent to the 2-category of 2-term L1-algebras in the sense of Stasheff. We also study strict and skeletal Lie 2-algebras, obtaining the former from strict Lie 2-groups and using the latter to classify Lie 2-algebras in terms of 3rd cohomology classes in Lie algebra cohomology. This classification allows us to construct for any finite-dimensional Lie algebra g a canonical 1-parameter family of Lie 2-algebras g~ which reduces to g at ~ = 0.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmoi of Internal Categories by Ross Street
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 258, Number 2, April 1980 COSMOI OF INTERNAL CATEGORIES BY ROSS STREET Abstract. An internal full subcategory of a cartesian closed category & is shown to give rise to a structure on the 2-category Cat(&) of categories in & which introduces the notion of size into the analysis of categories in & and allows proofs by transcendental arguments. The relationship to the currently popular study of locally internal categories is examined. Internal full subcategories of locally presentable categories (in the sense of Gabriel-Ulmer) are studied in detail. An algorithm is developed for their construc- tion and this is applied to the categories of double categories, triple categories, and so on. Introduction. The theory of categories is essentially algebraic in the terminology of Freyd [12]. This means that it is pertinent to take models of the theory in any finitely complete category &. Of course this does not mean that all the usual properties of categories are available to us in &. The 2-category Cat{&) of categories in & is finitely complete (Street [29]) so pullbacks, categories of Eilen- berg-Moore algebras for monads, comma categories, and so on, are available. Even some colimit constructions such as the categories of Kleisli algebras exist. Obvi- ously the more like the category Set of sets â becomes the more closely category theory internal to 6E resembles ordinary category theory. If & is finitely cocomp- lete, for example, we gain localization; or, if 6Bis cartesian closed we gain functor categories. Yet there is an aspect of category theory which distinguishes it from other essentially algebraic theories; namely, the question of size.
    [Show full text]
  • An Informal Introduction to Topos Theory
    An informal introduction to topos theory Tom Leinster∗ Contents 1 The definition of topos 3 2 Toposes and set theory 7 3 Toposes and geometry 13 4 Toposes and universal algebra 22 This short text is for readers who are confident in basic category theory but know little or nothing about toposes. It is based on some impromptu talks given to a small group of category theorists. I am no expert on topos theory. These notes are for people even less expert than me. In keeping with the spirit of the talks, what follows is light on both detail and references. For the reader wishing for more, almost everything here is presented in respectable form in Mac Lane and Moerdijk’s very pleasant introduction to topos theory (1994). Nothing here is new, not even the expository viewpoint (very loosely inspired by Johnstone (2003)). As a rough indication of the level of knowledge assumed, I will take it that arXiv:1012.5647v3 [math.CT] 27 Jun 2011 you are totally comfortable with the Yoneda Lemma and the concept of cartesian closed category, but I will not assume that you know the definition of subobject classifier or of topos. Section 1 explains the definition of topos. The remaining three sections discuss some of the connections between topos theory and other subjects. There are many more such connections than I will mention; I hope it is abundantly clear that these notes are, by design, a quick sketch of a large subject. Section 2 is on connections between topos theory and set theory. There are two themes here.
    [Show full text]