DOCSLIB.ORG

Making Inorganic Macrocycles a New Strategy for the Department

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Making Inorganic Macrocycles a New Strategy for the Department Summer 2010 Making inorganic macrocycles Predicting molecular properties A new strategy for the department Simulating how proteins fold As I see it... Cambridge chemistry alumnus Julian Huppert was elected as the LibDem MP for Cambridge in May. He spoke to Sarah Houlton about the election, and what his early days in parliament have involved Tell me about your chemistry background. What have you been up to since then? I started as an undergraduate at Cambridge in A huge amount! I’ve already asked a lot of ques - 1996, studying NatSci at Trinity, and specialising tions and spoken in various debates, and even in chemistry. After a gap year working for a asked a PMQ of David Cameron about Trident – financial software company in the City, I came he didn’t agree with me! I was also the first back for a PhD with Shankar Balasubramanian on LibDem to ask Nick Clegg a PMQ when he was DNA structure and function. I then got a research standing in for Cameron; it was about child fellowship at Trinity to work at the Sanger Centre, detention, and he announced that the children’s returned briefly to chemistry in the Unilever unit at the immigration removal centre Yarl’s centre, and then in 2007 started a research group Wood was being closed, which was a fantastic in the Cavendish lab – my work had become so result. That was on my birthday, too! I’ve asked biological it didn’t really fit in the chemistry questions in parliament about plenty of other department, so I moved to physics! topics, as well – the military, homelessness, the digital economy act, student visas and, of How did you get involved in politics? course, science funding. I’d always been interested in what was happen - While of course I want to champion science ing in the rest of the world, and my interest was I guess the election day itself was a I don’t want to be pigeonholed, and although I initially with the United Nations – I ran confer - very long one? am the LibDem backbench science rep I’m ences including simulations of the UN for It was, but because I had such a large team of actually on the home affairs select committee school and university groups, and set up a people – including some from the chemistry rather than the science and technology one – Cambridge university UN society. In the sixth department – it wasn’t too bad! The result was another LibDem Cambridge NatSci graduate form, I started to get more interested in domes - declared after 5am, so it was a very late night. was keen to do the science committee. But tic politics, and joined the Liberal Democrats, as From the piles of ballot papers the result was clear home affairs subjects like the immigration cap I discovered by watching Prime Minister’s for quite some time before it was declared, so are a big issue for science – how can we keep Questions (PMQs) that I kept agreeing with the there was an odd sense of hanging around for a science and high-tech businesses in places like LibDem position. I got involved in the student while, knowing I couldn’t actually celebrate yet. Cambridge going if we say to people outside campaign in Cambridge in the 1997 election, But I was very pleased with the result – the EU that we don’t really want them here? It’s and then in 2001 stood for Cambridgeshire Cambridge has 13 wards, and I won 12 and came an awful message to send, and we have to find County Council as a LibDem, and was elected close in the 13th, so it does feel like I represent all a way of dealing with that. It applies to student for East Chesterton, close to where I grew up. of Cambridge. I managed to get a few hours’ visas as well, so it’s a really big thing. I spent eight years on the council, and had sleep after that, but because of the election result been the leader of the LibDem opposition no-one actually knew what was happening next. Is it what you expected? group, before standing down last year when my People said it was like this, and I didn’t believe term was up. I’d found that running a research Those few days of uncertainty must them! It’s a bit of a madhouse – the hours are group was more than a full time job, and lead - have been fascinating. ridiculous. On Monday and Tuesday, for exam - ing the LibDem group took up at least another They were, yes. On the Monday and Tuesday ple, we’re supposed to finish at 10pm, but actu - two days, and it was getting hard to combine during the coalition negotiations, unlike the ally that’s when the votes start, and because each the two! But then the LibDem MP for other parties the LibDems were totally involved takes about 15 minutes it can be difficult to get Cambridge, David Howarth, decided to stand as members. We met many times and knew home, as I’m commuting from Cambridge. The down from parliament at this year’s election, what was happening at every stage, and ulti - 11.15 train is just about doable if there aren’t which got me thinking. I’d already stood for mately we had to vote on whether to accept the too many votes, but we can be much later – one parliament once, in 2005, but that was in deal. It was a real shock introduction to parlia - day we were still sitting at 2.30am! A couple of Huntingdon, John Major’s old seat, which used ment – there was no time for ‘this is your times I’ve had to stay in a hotel or with friends, to be the safest Tory seat in the country. office, this is your phone’ – it was more ‘we’ll but it’s tough on them as you show up after Cambridge was a very different proposition. do all of that later, just do this first and then midnight and leave again at 7am. I was already an approved candidate, and was we’ll tell you where to sit’. The general scientific understanding among one of very many who applied for the seat. Six We voted as a party at about 1am on the MPs is abysmal. Of course there are exceptions, of us were shortlisted, all locals, and then in Wednesday, but while we’d all seen the full text but many seem to think it’s acceptable not to December and January we had a month to go of the agreement, many of the Tory back - understand science – they’d never dream of saying round all the LibDem members in Cambridge benchers didn’t see it until it was published at they don’t know any Shakespeare, but think it’s OK to canvas votes, through the ice and snow! I had 10am. But I’m glad I’d seen it – it’s a big thing, not to know any science! There are even some a great team helping me, and it climaxed in a and I needed to be able to say that it was who are completely anti-science, and the recent packed hustings meeting – the room was full to broadly OK; of course there are bits I disagree report on homeopathy was a disgrace, as they bursting – and I was selected as the candidate. with, and if it were a LibDem-only government seem to have given up on the concept of evidence. I’d be horrified, but of course, it’s not as we One thing I am having to get used to is What was campaigning like? didn’t actually win the election! The fact that we changing from one topic to a very different one It was very intense, and pretty much a full-time all saw it was an important buy-in process. and getting up to speed on new subjects thing. I enjoyed it much more than the unsuc - quickly. And planning the diary is a nightmare, cessful campaign in Huntingdon as it involved You were pretty quick to make your as timings change – a 3.30pm debate can actu - a lot more people, and there was a real buzz of maiden speech, weren’t you? ally start at 6pm. We even had something on the energy. I took part in a huge number of hus - Yes, I gave it on day 2 of the Queen’s Speech order paper that said it would happen at, before tings meetings – 35 – with the other candi - debate. I wanted to get on with it – you’re not or after 7pm. dates. That was probably too many, but it was really supposed to do numerous other things It makes planning meetings difficult, and you interesting, especially those focused on specific until you’ve given your maiden speech. So I got often have to move them at the last minute, topics like disabled issues and homelessness. it in early, speaking about science, wellbeing which looks unprofessional. But it’s very excit - Preparing for them made me think more about and sustainable transport – I’m probably the ing, as well as being very hard work, and I’m those issues. It was an exhausting process! only MP who cycled home from their count! not regretting it – yet! 2 Chem@Cam Summer 2010 Reluctant reactions Letters Colloid absence inet. However, Chem@Cam always brings back the memories of several Dear Editor happy years spent on Lensfield Road.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unusual Activity of a Chlamydomonas TET/JBP Family Enzyme ,† ,‡ ,§,∥ 2 L
    1 Unusual Activity of a Chlamydomonas TET/JBP Family Enzyme ,† ,‡ ,§,∥ 2 L. Aravind,* Shankar Balasubramanian,* and Anjana Rao* † 3 National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 4 20894, United States ‡ 5 Department of Chemistry and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0RE, U.K. § 6 La Jolla Institute for Immunology and Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine, La Jolla, California 92037, United States ∥ 7 Department of Pharmacology and Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, California 92093, United States 8 he Great Oxygenation Event, which occurred on earth to 5mC. 5hmC and 5caC are produced in minor amounts, 55 9 T around 2.45 billion years ago, opened up the niche for through a mechanism that apparently does not require 2OG 56 10 enzymes that could directly oxidize substrates using molecular but needs ascorbate. 57 11 oxygen (O2), including the 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)- Ascorbate (>1 mM) is believed to help reduce Fe(III) at the 58 12 dependent dioxygenases. 2OGFe-dioxygenases possess a active site of 2OGFe-dioxygenases back to Fe(II), thereby 59 13 double-stranded b-helix fold, with an iron center chelated by “resetting” the active site for catalysis. Addition of ascorbate 60 1 14 two histidines and an aspartate. 2OGFe-dioxygenases catalyze results in a dose-dependent improvement in catalysis by 61 4 15 the incorporation of one atom of O2 into 2-oxoglutarate, mammalian TET1 and an increased amount of 5hmC in cells. 62 16 oxidizing it to succinate, and the second atom into an organic Thus, instead of the usual 2OG substrate, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Tnpsc Bits Tamil Nadu National
    • • July –18 TNPSC BITS ❖ Maneesha S Inamdar has been part of the WHO Expert Advisory Committee on Developing Global Standards for Governance and Oversight of Human Genome Editing. o She is an Indian stem cell and developmental biologist. TAMIL NADU AK Rajan committee report ❖ The Former judge A.K. Rajan submitted his report on the people’s response to the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET). ❖ The Justice Rajan told press persons that a majority of people who had responded were against NEET. ❖ NEET was introduced in the State in 2016 but it wasn’t until 2018 that it became mandatory for admission to medical colleges. ❖ Last year, the State government introduced a special reservation of 7.5% of the total seats available in the State pool for government school students. ❖ Around 300 students benefited under this scheme. ❖ This year the Union Education Ministry has proposed to hold NEET on September 12. NATIONAL Tokyo Olympics cheer song • • ❖ Singer Ananya Birla has teamed up with music maestro AR Rahman to launch a cheer song for Indian sports personalities as they gear up for Tokyo Olympics. ❖ Titled “Hindustani Way”, the song has been sung by Ananya and composed by Rahman. ❖ The Minister of Information and Broadcasting, Anurag Thakur also present in the launch of the song. Country’s first Grain ATM ❖ The country’s first ‘Grain ATM’ has been set up as a pilot project in Gurugram, Haryana. ❖ It works just like a bank ATM. ❖ This machine has been installed under the ‘World Food Programme’ of the United Nations (UN). ❖ It is called the ‘Automated, Multi Commodity, Grain Dispensing Machine’.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Sir Shankar Balasubramanian
    CV Sir Shankar Balasubramanian Sir Shankar Balasubramanian FRS FMedSci (born 30 September 1966) is an Indian-born British chemist and Herchel Smith Professor of Medicinal Chemistry in the Department of Chemistry the University of Cambridge, Senior Group Leader at the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute and Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. He is recognised for his contributions in the field of nucleic acids. He is scientific founder of Solexa and Cambridge Epigenetix. Born in Madras (now Chennai) India in 1966, Shankar Balasubramanian moved to the UK with his parents in 1967. He grew up in a rural area just outside Runcorn in Cheshire and attended Daresbury Primary School, then Appleton Hall High School (which has since amalgamated to form Bridgewater High School). He then went on to study the Natural Sciences Tripos at Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, where he did his undergraduate degree from 1985–88 and continued with a PhD for research on the reaction mechanism of the enzyme chorismate synthase supervised by Chris Abell (1988-1991). Following his PhD, Balasubramanian travelled to the USA as a SERC/NATO Research Fellow and worked in the group of Stephen J. Benkovic at Pennsylvania State University (1991-1993). He started his independent academic career in 1994 in the University of Cambridge and has remained there ever since, first as College Lecturer, then University Lecturer (1998), University Reader in Chemical Biology (2003) and Professor of Chemical Biology (2007). He was most recently appointed Herchel Smith Professor of Medicinal Chemistry in 2008. He currently when? directs research laboratories in the Department of Chemistry and also the Cancer Research UK (CRUK) Cambridge Institute at the Cambridge Biomedical Campus.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Chemistry University of Cambridge Biennial Report 2012 Edited and Designed by Sarah Houlton Photographs: Nathan Pitt and Caroline Hancox
    Chemistry @ Cambridge Department of Chemistry University of Cambridge biennial report 2012 Edited and designed by Sarah Houlton Photographs: Nathan Pitt and Caroline Hancox Printed by Callimedia, Colchester Published by the Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW. Opinions are not necessarily those of the editor, the department, or the university Reluctant reactions Academic staff An introduction to Christopher Abell Ali Alavi Stuart Althorpe Cambridge Chemistry Shankar Balasubramanian Nick Bampos Paul Barker Ian Baxendale Daniel Beauregard Andreas Bender Robert Best Peter Bond Sally Boss Jason Chin Alessio Ciulli Jane Clarke Stuart Clarke Aron Cohen Graeme Day Christopher Dobson Melinda Duer Stephen Elliott Daan Frenkel Matthew Gaunt Robert Glen Jonathan Goodman Clare Grey Neil Harris Laura Itzhaki Sophie Jackson David Jefferson This Biennial Report is designed to give themes: chemistry of health, chemistry Stephen Jenkins a brief introduction to the Chemistry for sustainability, and chemistry for Bill Jones Department of the University of novel materials. Rod Jones Cambridge. Our department has a long On these topics, we engage in open history, yet our national and interna - collaboration with national and interna - Markus Kalberer tional position is not determined by our tional partners in academia, industry James Keeler past but by our current perfor - and government. David Klenerman mance. Just over 50 research groups We are fortunate to attract some of Tuomas Knowles form the core of the department. They the brightest and the best students – Finian Leeper deliver the research and the teaching both nationally and internationally. We that have given the department its posi - aim to provide them with the very best Steven Ley tion among the very best in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual DNA and Medicinal Chemistry Memories of Cambridge in the 1950S Bioinorganic Studies and Teaching Duties a Chat With
    Spring 2012 Unusual DNA and medicinal chemistry Bioinorganic studies and teaching duties Memories of Cambridge in the 1950s A chat with the department’s deputy heads As I see it... When Daan Frenkel became head of department in October, it was with the help of two deputy heads of department – Jane Clarke and David Wales. Sarah Houlton talks to them about their roles, and what they involve Why does the new department struc - ture have this ‘triumvirate’ headship? David: Quite simply, because there is so much work involved – I don’t know how Bill Jones could possibly have done this on his own! I’ve worked here for more than 20 years and I really had no idea what lay underneath the tip of the iceberg in terms of the amount of organisation and administration the department needs. The only way to do this and keep people sane is with a hierarchical structure, with layers of committees and delegated authority, which is what we now have. I think it’s working quite well – we’ve had a reorganisation in terms of administrative staff, which has saved money while being more efficient. So Daan is the out - ward face of the department, I look after sup - port and resources, and Jane is responsible for staffing issues. t t i P n It does sound like rather a large task a h t for one person! So, Jane, what are a N your responsibilities? : o t o Jane: I’m responsible for all sorts of personnel h issues in the department. More than 900 people P are employed within the department, including sidering setting up a mentoring team, with a when fume cupboards return to the pool.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 2020 MILLENNIUM TECHNOLOGY PRIZE GOES TO… Relevant For: Developmental Issues | Topic: Health & Sanitation and Related Issues
    Source : www.thehindu.com Date : 2021-07-12 THE 2020 MILLENNIUM TECHNOLOGY PRIZE GOES TO… Relevant for: Developmental Issues | Topic: Health & Sanitation and related issues Perfect blend: The work of Shankar Balasubramanian (right) and David Klenerman brings together science and innovation. | Photo Credit: Millennium Technology Prize The 2020 Millennium Technology Prize, announced in May, has been awarded to Shankar Balasubramanian and David Klenerman, “for their development of revolutionary DNA sequencing techniques.” Their work is a perfect blend of science and innovation, and very apt as we have all heard a great deal about genome sequencing in the context of the ongoing pandemic. Awarded by the Republic of Finland, along with top Finnish academic institutions and industries, The Millennium Prize has a 21st century outlook, with a strong emphasis on innovation. Past winners include Tim Berners-Lee (for implementing the world-wide web) and Frances Arnold (for her work on directed evolution in a laboratory setting). Three of the eleven awardees so far have subsequently won Nobel prizes. We wait, with bated breath, for Balasubramanian and Klenerman! Shankar Balasubramanian was born in Chennai, and has lived in England for most of his life. After his PhD, he joined the Chemistry Department, Cambridge University. He teamed up with David Klenerman, recruited by the Department around the same time. The initial aim was to build a microscope that could follow single molecules. Of special interest to him was the molecular machinery that DNA uses to make copies of itself. Somewhere in their discussions arose the germ of the idea for a new way to read the alphabet that make up DNA, and to thereby access the information stored in them.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact Template (Ref3a) Page 1 Institution
    Impact template (REF3a) Institution: University of Cambridge Unit of Assessment: 8 a. Context The UoA has an exceptional track record in translating both basic and applied research into practical solutions that impact on human health, industry, society, the environment and the UK and global economy. Drug discovery and molecular biology are two key areas that have been impacted by our research during the census period. Collaborations, joint research projects, consultancy and training activities with industry have fostered economic growth and performance, and the UoA’s enterprise activities and support for local SMEs have played an important role in the economic competitiveness and vibrancy of the Cambridge Phenomenon. Researchers from the UoA have a demonstrated track record in connecting public policy and services with evidence-based research. b. Approach to impact The approach for encouraging impact at Cambridge, and in this UoA in particular, is characterised by strong support for technology transfer, industry engagement, public communication and influence on policy, combined with a generous IP policy. Commercial and Industrial Impact Staff are encouraged to make use of the University’s vehicle for technology transfer Cambridge Enterprise (CE), which delivers a range of technology transfer, consultancy and seed fund services. Chris Abell was instrumental in establishing CE in 2006, serving on the Board of Directors to 2011 and remaining active throughout in promoting technology transfer both within the UoA and across the University. Since 2008 three new spin-out companies were formed from research and technologies developed in the UoA. Sphere Fluidics (C. Abell and W. Huck, 2010), winner of the 2013 ACES pan-European award for academic spin-outs, exploits microdroplet technology developed from a Basic Technology Grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Trinity College Cambridge
    TRINITY COLLEGE cambridge annual record 2011 Trinity College Cambridge Annual Record 2010–2011 Trinity College Cambridge CB2 1TQ Telephone: 01223 338400 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.trin.cam.ac.uk Cover photo: ‘Through the Window’ by frscspd Contents 5 Editorial 7 The Master 13 Alumni Relations and Development 14 Commemoration 21 Trinity A Portrait Reviewed 24 Alumni Relations and Associations 33 Annual Gatherings 34 Alumni Achievements 39 Benefactions 57 College Activities 59 First & Third Trinity Boat Club 62 Field Club 81 Societies and Students’ Union 93 College Choir C ontent 95 Features 96 The South Side of Great Court 100 Trinity and the King James Bible S 108 Night Climbing 119 Fellows, Staff and Students 120 The Master and Fellows 134 Appointments and Distinctions 137 In Memoriam 153 An Eightieth Birthday 162 A Visiting Year at Trinity 167 College Notes 179 The Register 180 In Memoriam 184 Addresses Wanted 205 An Invitation to Donate TRINITY ANNUAL RECORD 2011 3 Editorial In its first issue of this academical year the Cambridge student newspaper Varsity welcomed Freshers—since one cannot apparently have freshmen and certainly not freshwomen—to ‘the best university in the world’. Four different rankings had given Cambridge the top position. Times Higher Education puts us sixth (incomprehensibly, after Oxford). While all league tables are suspect, we can surely trust the consistency of Cambridge’s position in the world’s top ten. Still more trust can be put in the Tompkins table of Tripos rankings that have placed Trinity top in 2011, since Tripos marks are measurable in a way that ‘quality and satisfaction’ can never be.
    [Show full text]
  • Battery Safety: All Solid State 20 How You Can Contribute20 October 2017 31 and Colleges of Cambridge
    12.0mm 210.0 x 297.0mm x 210.0 297.0mm x 210.0 297.0mm x 210.0 297.0mm x 210.0 0.672mm 1.34mm 13.01mm 0.672mm 0.336mm 19.0mm 19.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm 12.0mm 0BC M Y CM CMY CMY B C M Y C B C M Y C 20 C 40 C 80 B C M Y M B C M Y M 20 M 40 M 80 B C M Y B C M Y Y 20 Y 40 Y 80 B C M Y B C M Y B 20 B 40 B 80 B C M YYB C M Y CY CMY CMY B C M Y BBC M Y C 20 C 40 C 80 B C M Y C B C M Y M 20 Prinect CS−4i Format 102/105 Dipco 16.0d (pdf) © 2013 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG Y 80 B C M YYB C M Y B 20 B 40 B 80 B C M Y BBC M Y MY CMY CMY B C M Y B C M Y C 20 C 40 C 80 B C M Y B C M Y M 20 M 40 M 80 B C M Y C B C M Y Y 20 Y 40 Y 80 B C M Y M B C M Y B 20 B 40 B 80 B C M YYB C M Y CMY BBC M Y CMY −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 1 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 2 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 3 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 4 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 5 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 6 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 7 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 8 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 9 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 10 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 11 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 12 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 13 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 14 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 15 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 16 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 17 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 18 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 19 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 20 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 21 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 22 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 23 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 24 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 25 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 26 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 27 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 28 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 29 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 30 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 31 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−− 32 Chemistry at Cambridge Magazine SUMMER 2017 ISSUE 55 Paper Height 630.0mm New Look augmented chemistry 210.0 x 297.0mm 210.0 x 297.0mm 210.0 x 297.0mm 210.0 x 297.0mm 1.01mm 2.02mm 13.01mm To access the animated 3D structure of trans-beta-lactam, first, scan the QR code (top image) – recommended browser Firefox Mozilla.
    [Show full text]
  • Membership of Sectional Committees 2015
    Membership of Sectional Committees 2015 The main responsibility of the Sectional Committees is to select a short list of candidates for consideration by Council for election to the Fellowship. The Committees meet twice a year, in January and March. SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 1 [1963] SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 3 [1963] Mathematics Chemistry Chair: Professor Keith Ball Chair: Professor Anthony Stace Members: Members: Professor Philip Candelas Professor Varinder Aggarwal Professor Ben Green Professor Harry Anderson Professor John Hinch Professor Steven Armes Professor Christopher Hull Professor Paul Attfield Professor Richard Kerswell Professor Shankar Balasubramanian Professor Chandrashekhar Khare Professor Philip Bartlett Professor Steffen Lauritzen Professor Geoffrey Cloke Professor David MacKay Professor Peter Edwards Professor Robert MacKay Professor Malcolm Levitt Professor James McKernan Professor John Maier Professor Michael Paterson Professor Stephen Mann Professor Mary Rees Professor David Manolopoulos Professor John Toland Professor Paul O’Brien Professor Srinivasa Varadhan Professor David Parker Professor Alex Wilkie Professor Stephen Withers SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 2 [1963] SECTIONAL COMMITTEE 4 [1990] Astronomy and physics Engineering Chair: Professor Simon White Chair: Professor Hywel Thomas Members: Members: Professor Girish Agarwal Professor Ross Anderson Professor Michael Coey Professor Alan Bundy Professor Jack Connor Professor Michael Burdekin Professor Laurence Eaves Professor Russell Cowburn Professor Nigel Glover Professor John Crowcroft
    [Show full text]
  • Pnas11052ackreviewers 5098..5136
    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2013 The PNAS editors would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2013. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Harald Ade Takaaki Akaike Heather Allen Ariel Amir Scott Aaronson Karen Adelman Katerina Akassoglou Icarus Allen Ido Amit Stuart Aaronson Zach Adelman Arne Akbar John Allen Angelika Amon Adam Abate Pia Adelroth Erol Akcay Karen Allen Hubert Amrein Abul Abbas David Adelson Mark Akeson Lisa Allen Serge Amselem Tarek Abbas Alan Aderem Anna Akhmanova Nicola Allen Derk Amsen Jonathan Abbatt Neil Adger Shizuo Akira Paul Allen Esther Amstad Shahal Abbo Noam Adir Ramesh Akkina Philip Allen I. Jonathan Amster Patrick Abbot Jess Adkins Klaus Aktories Toby Allen Ronald Amundson Albert Abbott Elizabeth Adkins-Regan Muhammad Alam James Allison Katrin Amunts Geoff Abbott Roee Admon Eric Alani Mead Allison Myron Amusia Larry Abbott Walter Adriani Pietro Alano Isabel Allona Gynheung An Nicholas Abbott Ruedi Aebersold Cedric Alaux Robin Allshire Zhiqiang An Rasha Abdel Rahman Ueli Aebi Maher Alayyoubi Abigail Allwood Ranjit Anand Zalfa Abdel-Malek Martin Aeschlimann Richard Alba Julian Allwood Beau Ances Minori Abe Ruslan Afasizhev Salim Al-Babili Eric Alm David Andelman Kathryn Abel Markus Affolter Salvatore Albani Benjamin Alman John Anderies Asa Abeliovich Dritan Agalliu Silas Alben Steven Almo Gregor Anderluh John Aber David Agard Mark Alber Douglas Almond Bogi Andersen Geoff Abers Aneel Aggarwal Reka Albert Genevieve Almouzni George Andersen Rohan Abeyaratne Anurag Agrawal R. Craig Albertson Noga Alon Gregers Andersen Susan Abmayr Arun Agrawal Roy Alcalay Uri Alon Ken Andersen Ehab Abouheif Paul Agris Antonio Alcami Claudio Alonso Olaf Andersen Soman Abraham H.
    [Show full text]
  • Mutant Proteins and Cancer Drugs the Possibilities of Metal Structures
    Autumn 2008 Mutant proteins and cancer drugs Towards the $1000 genome The possibilities of metal structures What’s next for the CCDC? As I see it... virtual screening, we try to filter out those mol - Colin Groom, the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre’s new ecules that can’t possibly bind and identify the director, talks to Sarah Houlton about the centre and its future ones that might. What uses does it have outside What’s the CCDC all about? information about molecular recognition than pharma? It was set up in 1965 from the chemistry any other database, and the recognition that goes While it is primarily used in pharma, it also has department, and became independent in 1989 on between a small molecule and a crystal is very potential in crystalline materials. These are used as a not-for-profit company. This gives us a nice similar to that between a small molecule and a in many applications and we would like to stable structure as a self-sustaining research protein in the body. This allows us to derive com - extend the database into this field. It’s also institution, where we’re not driven by max - putational descriptions of those interactions, being used by material scientists who are trying imising profit but by doing good science. Our which companies not only use to optimise the fit to understand crystal growth – this also has activities fall into three strands, and the main between the molecule and the protein, but also pharma applications where scientists are trying one is the structural database, which now con - between a molecule and a lattice of other mole - to find the best crystal form to use in a drug tains more than 450,000 small molecule crystal cules in the materials science area.
    [Show full text]