DOCSLIB.ORG

Sunbelt XXV International Sunbelt Social Network Conference

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sunbelt XXV International Sunbelt Social Network Conference Program and Abstracts Sunbelt XXV International Sunbelt Social Network Conference Redondo Beach, CA February 16-20, 2005 Sponsors International Network for Social Network Analysis University of California, Irvine University of California, Los Angeles University of Southern California Conference Organizers Carter Butts Becca Davis Katherine Faust Tom Valente Student Assistants Peter Busse, Arul Chib Kate Coronges, Raquel Fosados Beth Hoffman, Janet Okamoto Miruna Petrescu-Prahova Patty Pumpuang & Darleen Schuster International Sunbelt Social Network Conference History Sunbelt Year Location Keynote Speaker Organizers I 1981 Tampa no speaker H. Russell Bernard & Alvin Wolfe II 1982 Tampa John Barnes H. Russell Bernard & Alvin Wolfe III 1983 San Diego James Coleman Douglas White IV 1984 Phoenix Harrison White Brian Foster V 1985 Palm Beach Linton Freeman H. Russell Bernard & Alvin Wolfe VI 1986 Santa Barbara J. Clyde Mitchell Eugene Johnsen & John Sonquist VII 1987 Clearwater Everett M. Rogers H. Russell Bernard & Alvin Wolfe VIII 1988 San Diego Charles Kadushin John Sonquist, Eugene Johnsen, Sue Freeman & Linton Freeman IX 1989 Tampa Frank Harary Jeffrey Johnson X 1990 San Diego Mark Granovetter Everett M. Rogers XI 1991 Tampa James Davis Katie Faust, Jeffrey Johnson, John Skvoretz & Alvin Wolfe XII 1992 San Diego Peter Blau Phillip Bonacich & Sue Freeman XIII 1993 Tampa A. Kimball Romney H. Russell Bernard & Alvin Wolfe XIV 1994 New Orleans Barry Wellman Scott Feld & Jill Suitor XV 1995 London Patrick Doreian Martin Everett & Keith Rennolls XVI 1996 Charleston Bonnie Erickson Katie Faust & John Skvoretz XVII 1997 San Diego H. Russell Bernard & Pat Doreian and Sue Freeman Peter Killworth XVIII 1998 Sitges Rolf Zeigler José Luis Molina, Josep A. Rodríguez, Nuria R. Ávila, Frans N. Stokman, Tom A. B. Snijders, Evelien P.H. Zeggelink, Stephen P. Borgatti, Alain Degenne, & Thomas Schweizer XIX 1999 Charleston Nan Lin John Skvoretz & Katie Faust XX 2000 Vancouver Linton Freeman Bill Richards & Andrew Seary XXI 2001 Budapest Martin Everett Endre Sik XXII 2002 New Orleans Philippa Pattison Ruth Aguilera, Noshir Contractor, Scott Feld, Caroline Haythornthwaite, Shin-Kap Han, Ravi Madhavan, & Stan Wasserman XXIII 2003 Cancún Alvin Wolf Jorge Gil-Mendieta, Narda Alcántra Valverde, Silvia Casasola argas, Jore Castro Cuellar, Alejandro Ruiz León, José Luis Molina, Smauel Schmidt, & Enrique Pérez García XXIV 2004 Portorož Frans Stokman Anuška Ferligoj, Vladimir Batagelj, Andrej Mrvar, Hajdeja Iglič, Andrej Rus, Gregor Petrič, Tina Kogovšek, Matjaž Zaveršnik, Nataša Kejžar, & Darinka Kovačič XXV 2005 Redondo Beach Ronald Breiger Carter Butts, Becca Davis, Katherine Faust & Tom Valente 2 Keynote and Plenary Addresses Sunbelt XXV Keynote Address Thursday, February 17 4:00 – 5:30 Pacific Peninsula Rooms Social Networks and the Spinozan Problem of Order Ronald L. Breiger University of Arizona Several major strands of contemporary research and theorizing on social networks claim origins in the classical “Hobbesian Problem of Order,” according to which individuals are posited as the wellsprings of action, as egoistic, rational and competitive actors in a minimalist environment, the major analytical question is how social life can establish itself and persist, given these assumptions. Social network analysis has been enriched by these lines of research and theory. I argue nonetheless that network analysts should be articulating multiple “problems of order,” so as to encompass and further network research that takes off from distinctive and different paradigmatic commitments and, at the same time, to raise necessary questions about the prospects for unifying social network research across diverse theoretical commitments. One of the first alternative places to turn is the work of Hobbes’s fellow seventeenth-century rationalist, Baruch (or Benedict) Spinoza. Spinoza’s theory provided a corrective, I argue, against those who (in Spinoza’s words) “believe that [the individual] … has absolute control over his actions, and that he is determined solely by himself.” Rooted in concepts of multiple networks, a startling anticipation of contemporary balance theory, and profound articulation of the co-constitution of multiple levels of society, Spinoza’s theory provides a useful starting point for new modeling efforts. I illustrate the applicability of a Spinozan approach by showing how a conventional multivariate model might usefully be reconceptualized as a model of social networks. Freeman Award Plenary Lecture Friday, February 18 4:00 – 5:30 Pacific Peninsula Rooms Dynamic Social Balance James Moody Ohio State University Where does network structure come from and how does it change over time? This paper provides an endogenous answer to these questions by extending previous work on balance theory. Key to the model is a recognition that people's experience of networks depends on their position in the network. As such, a relational change that makes one actor's social world more consistent will often create inconsistencies for others. Because actors have multiple solutions for such inconsistencies, a general tendency favoring social balance need not result in a crystallized equilibrium network. Instead, networks may reach a dynamic equilibrium, cycling through loosely connected groups that dissolve and merge to form new groups over time. The proposed triad transition model describes friendship patterns in a national sample of adolescents better than competing balance models in the cross section and over time. Using empirically based simulation models, I show that while strong tendencies toward transitivity crystallize social structures, moderate values result in a dynamic cycle of group formation and dissolution. 3 Program Overview Thursday 1 Morning THURSDAY 1 A: Redondo 2 B: Bay C: Redondo 3 Blockmodels and Data Inter-Organizational On-line Networks Reduction Networks (Broch) (Hubbard) (Rank) 8:00 Structural Patterns Of Corporate Governance Networks: The Case Of Germany Olaf N. Rank 8:30 Applying Data The Formation And Do Computer-Mediated Reduction Methods Evolution Of Communication Borrowed From Interorganizational Technologies (Cmct) Bioinformatics To Experience: Venture Inhibit Integration? Social Network Data Capital And Evidence From Alan Hubbard, Joseph Philadelphia, 1980- American Students’ Eisenberg, James 1999 Experience In A Swiss Trostle Jonathon Mote University Cristina Broch, Giuseppe Pagani 9:00 Two Methods For The Network Effect On Formation And Finding Image The Pay Norms Characteristics Of Matrices: Using Evolution In Korea Internet Assisted Random Graphs And Friendship And Sex Scree Plots To Identify Dong-Won Sohn Networks Cut-Off Criteria In Sevgi Aral, Divya Patel, Blockmodeling Analysis King K. Holmes, Betsy Itai Himelboim, Betsy Foxman Neibergall Anderson 9:30 The Blockmodel The Network Form Of Personal Networks On Approach To The Social The Cooperative The Internet Support Networks Of Fa Organization: The Dominik Batorski, Village Danish Pork Sector Pawel Kucharski Liu Jun Kostas Karantininis, Jesper T. Graversen 10:00 Break Break Break 4 Program Overview Thursday 1 Morning D: Redondo 1 E: Catalina F: Marina G: Esplanade Social Problems Social Movements Exchange and Networks in the (Card) (Tindall) Competition Developing World (Doerfel) (Trostle) Children’s Intra- and A Network Analysis Of Correlates At Inter-Gender The Environmental Community Levels Perceptions of Social Movement Among Social Networks Aggression and Social Organizations In South In Nine Villages Of Status Korea: Governance, Coastal Ecuador Noel A. Card, Todd D. Claim-Makings, And James Trostle, James Little, Ernest V. E. Participation Scott, William Cevallos, Hodges, Patricia H. Hyung Sam Park Betty Ayovi, Joseph Hawley Eisenberg Friendship And Are Network Stars Assessing The Degree Kinship Network And Delinquency In Early Media Stars? The Of Cooperation- Contraception In Rural Adolescence. A Study Of Relationship Between Competition With Bangladesh Selection And Influence Environmental Activist Network Analysis Dr Kaberi Gayen, Dr Processes Ego-Network Marya Doerfel Robert Raeside Andrea Knecht, Chris Characteristics And Baerveldt, Christian Media Citations Steglich Todd Malnick, D.B. Tindall Homelessness, Injection Citizen Technoscience: Exchange Networks Network Change At Drug Use, And Internet Discussion With And Without Multiple Levels: Kinship Involvement In The Networks In The Externalities: A And Helping Ties In Street Economy Differ International Grassroots Cooperative Game- Nang Rong, Thailand In The Networks Of Biodiesel Fuel Theoretical Approach Barbara Entwisle, Youth In Different Movement Jacob Dijkstra Katherine Faust, Ronald Stages Of Youth Dave Conz Rindfuss Homelessness Colette L. Auerswald, Md, Ms, Eiko Sugano, Mph, Jonathan Ellen, Md The Role Of Social The Structure Of Resource Variation And Social Network Connections And Social International Power In Exchange Structure Among Nine Identity In School Knowledge Network Networks Villages In Coastal Violence Seung Joon Jun and David R. Schaefer Ecuador: Individual Michele Mouttapa, George A. Barnett Characteristics Jennifer B. Unger, Steve Associated With Degree Sussman, Tom Valente James Scott, James Trostle, William Cevallos, Betty Ayovi, Joseph Eisenberg Break Break Break Break 5 Program Overview Thursday 2 Morning THURSDAY 2 A: Redondo 2 B: Bay C: Redondo 3 Models Organizations Homophily (O’Madadhain) (Lezega) (Faris) 10:30 Learning Predictive Interlocking Directorate Homophily Among Models
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qt9tb2z9ps.Pdf
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title Anthropology: Analyzing large kinship and marriage networks with Pgraph and Pajek Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9tb2z9ps Journal Social Science Computer Review, 17(3) ISSN 0894-4393 Authors White, DR Batagelj, V Mrvar, A Publication Date 1999 DOI 10.1177/089443939901700302 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW White et al. / KINSHIP AND MARRIAGE NETWORKS Anthropology Analyzing Large Kinship and Marriage Networks With Pgraph and Pajek DOUGLAS R. WHITE University of California, Irvine VLADIMIR BATAGELJ ANDREJ MRVAR University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Five key problems of kinship networks are boundedness, cohesion, size and cohesive relinking, types of relations and relinking, and groups or roles. Approaches to solving these problems include formats available for electronic storage of genealogical data and representations of genealogies using graphs. P-graphs represent couples and uncoupled children as vertices, whereas parent-child links are the arcs connecting nodes both within and between different nuclear families. Using results from graph theory, P-graphs are shown to lend themselves to solutions of the problems discussed. Relinking of families through marriage, for example, can be formally defined as sets of bounded groups that are the cohesive cores of kinship networks, with nodes at various distances from such cores. The structure of such cores yields an analytic decomposition of kinship networks and constituent group and role relationships. The Pgraph and Pajek programs for large network analysis help both to represent kinship networks and their patterns and to solve problems of analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • ECPR Summer School on Methods and Techniques, 4 August – 15
    10th ECPR Summer School in Methods and Techniques, 23 July - 8 August University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Course Description Form – 2 week course, 30 hours Course title SD205. Introduction to Network Analysis using Pajek Instructor details First name, last name: Vladimir Batagelj Department/Unit: Dept. of Theoretical Computer Science Institution: Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Mechanics Phone: +386 1 4766-672 Fax: +386 1 2517-281 E-mail : [email protected] Short Bio Vladimir Batagelj is professor of Discrete and Computational Mathematics at the University of Ljubljana. His main research interests are in mathematics and computer science: combinatorics with emphasis on graph theory, algorithms on graphs and networks, combinatorial optimisation, algorithms and data structures, cluster analysis, visualisation, social network analysis and applications of information technology in education. With Andrej Mrvar he is developing from 1996 a program Pajek for analysis and visualisation of large networks. He is a co-author of the books Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek (Cambridge University Press, 2005; Second edition, 2011), Generalized Blockmodeling (Cambridge University Press, 2004) and Understanding Large Temporal Networks and Spatial Networks (Wiley, 2014). http://vladowiki.fmf.uni-lj.si/doku.php?id=vlado Prerequisite knowledge Note from the Academic Convenors to prospective participants: by registering to this course, you certify that you possess the prerequisite knowledge that is requested to be able to follow this course. The instructor will not teach again these prerequisite items. If you doubt whether you possess that knowledge to a sufficient extent, we suggest you contact the instructor before you proceed to your registration.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek
    This page intentionally left blank Exploratory Network Analysis with Pajek This is the first textbook on social network analysis integrating theory, applications, and professional software for performing network analysis (Pajek). Step by step, the book introduces the main structural concepts and their applications in social research with exercises to test the understanding. In each chapter, each theoretical section is followed by an application section explain- ing how to perform the network analyses with Pajek software. Pajek software and data sets for all examples are freely available, so the reader can learn network analysis by doing it. In addition, each chapter offers case studies for practicing network analy- sis. In the end, the reader has the knowledge, skills, and tools to apply social network analysis in all social sciences, ranging from anthropology and sociology to business administration and history. Wouter de Nooy specializes in social network analysis and ap- plications of network analysis to the fields of literature, the vi- sual arts, music, and arts policy. His international publications have appeared in Poetics and Social Networks. He is Lecturer in methodology and sociology of the arts, Department of History and Arts Studies, Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Andrej Mrvar is assistant Professor of Social Science Informat- ics at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. He has won several awards for graph drawings at competitions between 1995 and 2000. He has edited Metodoloski zvezki since 2000. Vladimir Batagelj is Professor of Discrete and Computational Mathematics at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia and is a member of the editorial boards of Informatica and Journal of Social Structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Kinship Relations with Pajek 3
    Social Science Computer Review Volume XX Number X Month XXXX xx-xx © 2007 Sage Publications Analysis of Kinship Relations 10.1177/0894439307299587 http://ssc.sagepub.com hosted at With Pajek http://online.sagepub.com Vladimir Batagelj Andrej Mrvar University of Ljubljana, Slovenia In the article, two general approaches to analysis of large sparse networks are presented: frag- ment searching and matrix multiplication. These two approaches are applied to analysis of large genealogies. Genealogies can be represented as graphs in different ways: as Ore graphs, p-graphs, or bipartite p-graphs. We show that p-graphs are more suitable for searching for relinking patterns, whereas Ore graphs are better for computing kinship relations using matrix multiplication. Algorithms described in this article are implemented in the program Pajek. Keywords: genealogy; Ore graph; p-graph; bipartite p-graph; calculating kinship relations; relinking marriages; relinking index; large networks; social network analysis; Pajek Introduction People collect genealogical data for several different reasons or purposes: • Researchers in history, sociology, and anthropology (Hamberger, Houseman, Daillant, White, & Barry, 2005; White, Batagelj, & Mrvar, 1999) use genealogies to compare dif- ferent cultures. In these researches, they consider kinship as a fundamental social relation. • Individuals collect records about their families or about people living in a longer period on a selected territory, for example: • Mormon genealogy (MyFamily.com, 2004) • Genealogy of the S¸kofja Loka District (Hawlina, 2004) • Genealogy of American presidents (Tompsett, 1993) • There exist special genealogies where the relation is “nonbiological”: • Students and their Ph.D. thesis advisors (Theoretical Computer Science Genealogy; Johnson & Parberry, 1993) • Genealogies of gods of antiquity (Hawlina, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek Revised and Expanded Second Edition
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00238-8 - Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek: Revised and Expanded Second Edition Wouter De Nooy, Andrej Mrvar and Vladimir Batagelj Frontmatter More information Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek Revised and Expanded Second Edition This is the first textbook on social network analysis integrating theory, applications, and professional software for performing network analysis (Pajek). Step by step, the book introduces the main structural concepts and their applications in social research with exercises to test understanding. In each chapter, each theoretical section is followed by an application section explaining how to perform the network analyses with Pajek software. Pajek software and datasets for all examples are freely available, so the reader can learn network analysis by doing it. In addition, each chapter offers case studies for practicing network analysis. In the end, the reader will have the knowledge, skills, and tools to apply social network analysis in all social sciences, ranging from anthropology and sociology to business administration and history. Wouter de Nooy is Associate Professor in the Department of Communication Science at the University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and a member of the Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR) and the Netherlands School of Communication Research (NESCoR). Andrej Mrvar is Associate Professor of Social Science Informatics on the Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia. He won several awards for graph drawings at competitions between 1995 and 2005. He has edited Metodoloski zvezki – Advances in Methodology and Statistics since 2000. Vladimir Batagelj is Professor of Discrete and Computational Mathematics at the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, and a member of the editorial boards of Informatica and Journal of Social Structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Pajek Workshop Day 1: Andrej Mrvar Day 2: Vladimir Batagelj
    A. Mrvar and V. Batagelj: Pajek 1 ' $ Pajek Workshop Day 1: Andrej Mrvar Day 2: Vladimir Batagelj University of Ljubljana Photo: Stefan Ernst,Gartenkreuzspinne / Araneus diadematus Slovenia Sunbelt XXIX San Diego, March 10-15, 2009 & s s y s l s y s s *6 % A. Mrvar and V. Batagelj: Pajek 2 ' $ Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek Wouter de Nooy∗ Andrej Mrvary Vladimir Batageljy University of Amsterdam∗ University of Ljubljanay & s s y s l s y s s *6 % A. Mrvar and V. Batagelj: Pajek I-3 ' Outline $ 4 Pajek........................................4 6 Network – .NET ..................................6 14 Some commands in Draw window......................... 14 15 Determining layouts of networks.......................... 15 17 Partitions...................................... 17 21 Vectors....................................... 21 22 Pajek project files................................. 22 23 Output formats................................... 23 26 Nice pictures of networks............................. 26 27 Basic information about a network......................... 27 31 Global and local views on network......................... 31 33 Example: Import and export among countries................... 33 33 Extracting subnetworks.............................. 33 33 Reduction – shrinking............................... 33 & s s y s l s y s s *6 % A. Mrvar and V. Batagelj: Pajek I-4 ' $ 35 Degrees...................................... 35 39 Cores........................................ 39 42 Centrality measures in Pajek...........................
    [Show full text]
  • ECPR Summer School on Methods and Techniques, 4 August – 15
    2013 ECPR Summer School in Methods and Techniques University of Ljubljana Course Description Form Course title B6. Introduction to Network Analysis using Pajek Instructor details First name, last name: Vladimir Batagelj Department/Unit: FMF, Department of Mathematics Institution: University of Ljubljana Full postal address for ECPR correspondence: Jadranska 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia Phone: +386 1 4766-672 Fax: +386 1 2517-281 E-mail : [email protected] Short Bio Vladimir Batagelj is professor of Discrete and Computational Mathematics at the University of Ljubljana. His main research interests are in mathematics and computer science: combinatorics with emphasis on graph theory, algorithms on graphs and networks, combinatorial optimisation, algorithms and data structures, cluster analysis, visualisation, social network analysis and applications of information technology in education. With Andrej Mrvar he is developing from 1996 a program Pajek for analysis and visualisation of large networks. He is a co-author of the books Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek (Cambridge University Press, 2005; Second edition, 2011) and Generalized Blockmodeling (Cambridge University Press, 2004). Short outline: The course aims to provide an introduction into the main topics and concepts of social network analysis. It focuses on the analysis and visualisation of complete networks. Participants will get an understanding of basic network analysis concepts like centrality, cohesion, blockmodeling, etc. Special attention will be given to the analysis of large networks. After the course participants should be able to examine data in ’social networks way’ – they should be able to identify and formulate their own network analysis problems, solve them using network analysis software and interpret the obtained results.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Sharing and Networking in Transatlantic Relations: a Network Analytical Approach to Scientific and Technological Cooperation
    KNOWLEDGE SHARING AND NETWORKING IN TRANSATLANTIC RELATIONS: A NETWORK ANALYTICAL APPROACH TO SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL COOPERATION A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Gabriella Paar-Jakli December 2010 Dissertation written by Gabriella Paar-Jakli B.S., University of Pécs, 1982 B.A., Budapest Business School, 1986 M.B.A. Kent State University, 2001 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2010 Approved by Dr. Steven W. Hook, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Andrew Barnes, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Julie Mazzei, Dr. Alberta Sbragia, Dr. Ruoming Jin, Accepted by Dr. Steven W. Hook, Chair, Department of Political Science Dr. Timothy Moerland, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES……………………………………………………………………....vi LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………...viii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.........................................................................................x CHAPTER Page 1 DISSERTATION OVERVIEW ..............................................................................1 Introduction .............................................................................................................1 Theory and Analytical Concepts – Literature Review.............................................7 Knowledge, Access, and International Communication……..…………....7 The Role of Discourse and Civil Society in International Communication……………………………………………………………9 Networks and Social Capital………………………………………..……12
    [Show full text]
  • Vladimir Batagelj Is 70
    Vladimir Batagelj is 70 Vladimir Batagelj, known as Vlado to his friends, is one of the most prolific Slov- enian scientists. Although he has a PhD in mathematics and has worked most of his active life at the Department of Mathemat- ics of the University of Ljubljana where he is now Professor Emeritus, he has very broad research interests and a passion for teaching. Over ten years before obtain- ing his PhD, Vlado published a solo pa- per on quadratic hash method in the dis- tinguished journal Communications of the ACM. When I was a graduate student of computer science at Penn State, one of our textbooks cited his paper. I was very proud to tell my fellow graduate students that Vlado and I attended the same courses as undergraduates. Actually, during compul- sory military service we shared a room in barracks in Zagreb for a year. Vlado’s scientific work has been cited over 11000 times in Google Scholar; over Vladimir Batagelj 5400 times since 2013. His most cited work, with over 3300 citations, is his book Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek, writ- ten together with W. de Nooy and A. Mrvar. The book was also translated into Chinese and Japanese. The revised and expanded 3rd edition of this successful textbook was published by Cambridge University Press this year. Pajek is a highly successful, freely available soft- ware package for large networks analysis, authored by Vlado and his former PhD student Andrej Mrvar and used widely in social sciences. Vlado is one of the pioneers of discrete mathematics and theoretical computer sci- ence in Slovenia, who chartered his aca- demic course on his own and works on problems that he finds interesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Issue: Hot Topics in European Agent Research II Guest Editors: Andrea Omicini Paolo Petta Matjaž Gams EDITORIAL BOARDS, PUBLISHING COUNCIL
    Volume 30 Number 1 January 2006 Special Issue: Hot Topics in European Agent Research II Guest Editors: Andrea Omicini Paolo Petta Matjaž Gams EDITORIAL BOARDS, PUBLISHING COUNCIL Informatica is a journal primarily covering the European com- Editorial Board puter science and informatics community; scientific and educa- Suad Alagic´ (USA) tional as well as technical, commercial and industrial. Its basic Anders Ardo (Sweden) aim is to enhance communications between different European Vladimir Bajic´ (South Africa) structures on the basis of equal rights and international referee- Vladimir Batagelj (Slovenia) ing. It publishes scientific papers accepted by at least two ref- Francesco Bergadano (Italy) erees outside the author’s country. In addition, it contains in- Marco Botta (Italy) formation about conferences, opinions, critical examinations of Pavel Brazdil (Portugal) existing publications and news. Finally, major practical achieve- Andrej Brodnik (Slovenia) ments and innovations in the computer and information industry Ivan Bruha (Canada) are presented through commercial publications as well as through Wray Buntine (Finland) independent evaluations. Hubert L. Dreyfus (USA) Editing and refereeing are distributed. Each editor from the Jozo Dujmovic´ (USA) Editorial Board can conduct the refereeing process by appointing Johann Eder (Austria) two new referees or referees from the Board of Referees or Edi- Vladimir A. Fomichov (Russia) torial Board. Referees should not be from the author’s country. If Janez Grad (Slovenia) new referees are appointed, their names will appear in the list of Hiroaki Kitano (Japan) referees. Each paper bears the name of the editor who appointed Igor Kononenko (Slovenia) the referees. Each editor can propose new members for the Edi- Miroslav Kubat (USA) torial Board or referees.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Blockmodeling Patrick Doreian, Vladimir Batagelj and Anuska Ferligoj Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 0521840856 - Generalized Blockmodeling Patrick Doreian, Vladimir Batagelj and Anuska Ferligoj Frontmatter More information Generalized Blockmodeling This book provides an integrated treatment of blockmodeling, the most frequently used technique in social network analysis. It secures its mathematical foundations and then generalizes blockmodeling for analyzing many types of network struc- tures. Examples are used throughout the text and include small group structures, little league baseball teams, intra-organizational networks, inter-organizational networks, baboon grooming networks, marriage ties of noble families, trust net- works, signed networks, Supreme Court decisions, journal citation networks, and alliance networks. Also provided is an integrated treatment of algebraic and graph theoretic concepts for network analysis and a broad introduction to cluster analysis. These formal ideas are the foundations for the authors’ proposal for direct opti- mizational approaches to blockmodeling, which yield blockmodels that best fit the data – a measure of fit that is integral to the establishment of blockmodels – and cre- ates the potential for many generalizations and a deductive use of blockmodeling. Patrick Doreian is a professor of sociology and statistics at the University of Pittsburgh and is chair of the Department of Sociology. He has edited the Journal of Mathematical Sociology since 1982 and has been a member of the editorial board for Social Networks since 2003. He was a Centennial professor at The London School of Economics during 2002. He has been a visiting professor at the University of California-Irvine and the University of Ljubljana. His interests include social networks, mathematical sociology, interorganizational networks environmental sociology, and social movements. Vladimir Batagelj is a professor of discrete and computational mathematics at the University of Ljubljana and is chair of the Department of Theoretical Computer Science at IMFM, Ljubljana.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Language of Networks
    LANGUAGE OF NETWORKS 1st interdisciplinary international conference & exhibition on networks. In the framework of Ars Electronica 2004 „TIMESHIFT – The World in Twenty-Five Years“. conference: september 1 and 2, 2004 exhibition: september 1 - 7, 2004 www.aec.at/networks www.fas.at curated by Lothar Krempel, Ruth Pfosser, Dietmar Offenhuber a joint project of LANGUAGE OF NETWORKS Conference, September 1, 2004 Time Place see Page 10:00-11:00 Round Table / Press Conference Sky Media Loft 7 How Innovations Happen 10:00-19:00 Cave Presentations CAVE 7 Salzburg Sommer Joker Vladimir Batagelj (SI) Jeff Johnson (USA) Lothar Krempel (DE) Andrej Mrvar (SI) Gerhard Wührer (AT) EURO2004 Football Tournament Ulrik Brandes (DE) 13:00-13:30 Introductory Lecture Seminarraum 7 Networks: Science-Art Lothar Krempel (DE) 14:00-16:30 Panel I Seminarraum 8 Information Visualization Ulrik Brandes (DE) - Network Visualization and Graph Drawing Lothar Krempel (DE) - Communicating Empirical Information with Color Anne Nigten (NL) - Mental Maps W. Bradford Paley (USA) - Information Visualization: Meaning, Evolution, and Design; How to Engage Cognition Using Early Vision René Weiskircher (AT) - Network Visualization and Graph Drawing 14:00-16:30 Panel II Sky Media Loft 9 Mapping Research and Innovation Jürgen Güdler (DE) - 2003 DFG Funding Ranking: Methods, Findings and Perspectives Nikolaos Kastrinos (EL) - Mapping the Social Sciences and Humanities in Europe: Needs, Challenges and Prospects Wolfgang Neurath (AT) - Social Network Analysis (SNA): A New Method for Exploring Patterns of Innovation Stefan Thurner (AT) - Complex Systems Theory, Evolution and Innovation 17:00-19:00 Panel III Seminarraum 10 Networks and Art (in German) Gerhard Dirmoser (AT) - Depictions of Networks in the Field of Art - A Contribution to Diagrammatics Urs Hirschberg (CH) - Networks of Collective Authorship Astrit Schmidt-Burghardt (DE) - Art‘s Family Trees.
    [Show full text]