DOCSLIB.ORG

Well-Being & Indigenous Language

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Well-Being & Indigenous Language WELL-BEING & INDIGENOUS LANGUAGE ECOLOGIES (WILE): A STRENGTHS-BASED APPROACH Literature Review. National Indigenous Languages Report, Pillar 2. Report commissioned by the Australian Government Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications (formerly the Department of Communications and the Arts). Denise Angelo, Carmel O’Shannessy, Jane Simpson, Inge Kral, Hilary Smith and Emma Browne Final draft FeBruary 26, 2019 Revised OctoBer 2019 Australian National University ARC Centre of Excellence for the Dynamics of Language ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper was commissioned By the Australian Government Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications (formerly the Department of Communications and the Arts) to inform the 2019 National Indigenous Languages Report. The National Indigenous Languages Report is envisaged as part of the Australian Government’s commitment to Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages and their speakers. The authors are grateful for the support of staff from these departments. We thank Susan Poetsch, Michael Jarrett, MuurrBay ABoriginal Language and Culture Cooperative, Marie Rhydwen, Jackie van den Bos, Ngukurr Language Centre and Greg Dickson for their contriButions to the case studies, and Erika Charola, Henry Fraser, Cassy Nancarrow, Jason Lee, John Mansfield, Douglas Marmion, Frances Morphy for expert advice on the categorisation of language ecologies. We thank Brenda Thornley for designing the map. We thank Justine Curnow, Eilleen Eugenio, Kylie Nelson, Jane Carter and Sheridan Williams from DoCA and DoITRDC for initiating the NILR and seeing it through to puBlication. We also particularly acknowledge useful advice in the early stages of our research received from the Indigenous Field Officers with the Indigenous Languages and Arts (ILA) program, then administered by DoCA. For much informative discussion we thank our colleagues at the Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, Jacqueline Battin, Jason Lee and Doug Marmion, and at the Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Heather Crawford, Yonatan Dinku, Tony Dreise, Janet Hunt, Francis Markham and Danielle Venn, as well as Katharine Blackwell and Stephen Haslett, former director of the Statistical Consulting Unit, Australian National University. Finally we received valuaBle suggestions from audiences at the Foundation for Endangered Languages (2018), the Aboriginal Languages Workshop (2019) and attendees at discussions in November-DecemBer 2018 organised by the Australian Government Department of Education and Training, in December 2018 by the Department of Prime Minister and CaBinet and August 2019 By the National Indigenous Australians Agency. All opinions and any errors in this report are the sole responsiBility of the authors. COPYRIGHT © Commonwealth of Australia 2019 The material in this Report is licensed under a Creative Commons AttriBution—4.0 International licence, with the exception of: • the logo of the Australian National University • any third party material • More information on this CC BY licence is set out as follows: • Creative Commons weBsite— www.creativecommons.org • AttriBution 4.0 international (CC By 4.0)— www.creativecommons.org/licenses/By/4.0 CITATION This report was produced By memBers of the Australian National University’s Pillar 2 research team for the National Indigenous Languages Report. It could be cited as: Angelo, Denise; O’Shannessy, Carmel; Simpson, Jane; Kral, Inge; Smith, Hilary & Browne, Emma. 2019. Well-being & Indigenous Language Ecologies (WILE): A strengths-based approach. Literature Review for the National Indigenous Languages Report, Pillar 2. CanBerra: The Australian National University. ISBN 978-0-6480548-0-1. doi 10.25911/5dd50865580ea. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/1885/186414. RELATED WORKS Members of the ANU’s Pillar 2 research team also produced this working paper: Dinku, Yonatan; Markham, Francis; Venn, Danielle; Angelo, Denise; Simpson, Jane; O’Shannessy, Carmel; Hunt, Janet; Dreise, Tony. 2019. Indigenous languages use is connected to indicators of well-being: Evidence from the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey 2014-15. CAEPR Working Paper 132. CanBerra: The Australian National University. doi 10.25911/5ddB9fd6394e8. AvailaBle from http://hdl.handle.net/1885/186511. This report was prepared in association with the National Indigenous Languages Report: Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Communications (DoITRDC), Australian Institute for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS) and Australian National University (ANU). 2020. National Indigenous Languages Report. CanBerra: Australian Government. AvailaBle from https://www.arts.gov.au/what-we- do/indigenous-arts-and-languages/national-indigenous-languages-report. Well-being & Indigenous language ecologies (WILE): A strengths-based approach | 2 Table of Contents Definitions .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 AbBreviations ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Historical Background ......................................................................................................................... 11 2 The Well-being and Indigenous Language Ecologies (WILE) framework ................................................ 12 2.1 A strengths-based framework ............................................................................................................ 13 2.1.1 Key themes and interpretation ................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Different kinds of languages ...................................................................................................... 13 2.1.3 Some important clarifications of terminology ............................................................................. 14 1.2 Diverse language ecologies ............................................................................................................... 15 3 Language ecologies: WILE Dimension 1 ................................................................................................. 16 3.1 Traditional Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Languages ................................................................. 16 3.2 New Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander languages ........................................................................ 17 3.3 Englishes ............................................................................................................................................ 18 3.4 Multilingualism .................................................................................................................................... 19 3.5 Why language ecologies matter ......................................................................................................... 19 3.6 Existing data, large data sets and language ecologies ...................................................................... 19 3.7 Issues and limitations in using language data from large language surveys ..................................... 20 3.8 Rationale for a language ecology approach ....................................................................................... 23 3.9 Individual language repertoires .......................................................................................................... 24 4 Contexts of use: WILE Dimension 2 ........................................................................................................ 25 4.1 Languages for being ........................................................................................................................... 25 4.2 Languages for engagement and access ............................................................................................ 26 4.3 Languages and livelihoods ................................................................................................................. 26 4.3.1 Land and sea management ....................................................................................................... 27 4.3.2 Arts and culture .......................................................................................................................... 27 4.3.3 Tourism ...................................................................................................................................... 27 4.3.4 Language services ..................................................................................................................... 27 4.3.5 Translation and interpreting ....................................................................................................... 27 4.3.6 Languages in education ............................................................................................................. 28 4.3.7 Unpaid/volunteer work ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RAL-Chapter-9.Pdf (PDF, 231.64KB)
    9 Maam ngawaala: biindu ngaawa nyanggan bindaayili. Language centres: keeping language strong Anna Ash, Pauline Hooler, Gary Williams and Ken Walker1 Abstract We begin by describing the history and main activities of Muurrbay Aboriginal Language and Culture Co-operative and Many Rivers Aboriginal Language Centre. Comments from Elders, language teachers and researchers are included to reflect the opinions of a diverse range of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people. We discuss some aspects of research, publishing, language education and information technology. Finally we make some recommendations for groups who are just starting out on this challenging but rewarding road. This volume was at least partially inspired by The green book of language revitalization in practice. There is a chapter in that book called ‘Diversity in Local Language Maintenance and Restoration: A Reason for Optimism’. It emphasises that there is a positive future for the revitalisation of Aboriginal languages: There is reason for optimism because local language communities all over the world are taking it upon themselves to act on behalf of their imperilled linguistic traditions in full understanding of, and in spite of, the realistic perception that the cards are stacked against them. There is, in effect an international movement in which local communities work in defiance of the forces pitted against their embattled languages. It has something of the character of a modern miracle, if you think about it – while they share the goal of promoting a local language, these groups are essentially independent of one another, coming together sometimes to compare notes, but operating in effective separation. Two factors in our optimism are the very existence of the movement itself and what is sometimes decried as a flaw in the movement: the feature of 1 All authors are from the Muurrbay Aboriginal Language and Culture Co-operative & Many Rivers Aboriginal Language Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Clamor Schürmann's Barngarla Grammar This Book Is Available As a Free Fully-Searchable Ebook from Clamor Schürmann's Barngarla Grammar
    Clamor Schürmann's Barngarla grammar This book is available as a free fully-searchable ebook from www.adelaide.edu.au/press Clamor Schürmann's Barngarla grammar A commentary on the first section of A vocabulary of the Parnkalla language (revised edition 2018) by Mark Clendon Linguistics Department, Faculty of Arts The University of Adelaide Clamor Wilhelm Schürmann Published in Adelaide by University of Adelaide Press The University of Adelaide Level 14, 115 Grenfell Street South Australia 5005 [email protected] www.adelaide.edu.au/press The University of Adelaide Press publishes externally refereed scholarly books by staff of the University of Adelaide. It aims to maximise access to the University’s best research by publishing works through the internet as free downloads and for sale as high quality printed volumes. © 2015 Mark Clendon, 2018 for this revised edition This work is licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) License. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA. This licence allows for the copying, distribution, display and performance of this work for non-commercial purposes providing the work is clearly attributed to the copyright holders. Address all inquiries to the Director at the above address. For the full Cataloguing-in-Publication data please contact the National Library of Australia: [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Muurrbay Aboriginal Language and Culture Co-Operative
    Many Rivers Aboriginal Language Centre Muurrbay auspices Many Rivers Aboriginal Language Centre, a regional language activity that provides language revitalisation support to Aboriginal communities of coastal NSW. Seven languages are supported, from the Queensland border to the Hawkesbury River: Bundjalung – Yugambeh dialect chain; Yaygirr; Gumbaynggirr; Dhanggati; Gathang (Birrbay, Warrimay and Guringay); Hunter River & Lake Macquarie Language (Awabakal/Wonnarua); and Muurrbay Darkinyung. We work closely with Elders and local language, culture Aboriginal Language and educational organisations to conduct research, publish accessible grammars and dictionaries and develop and Culture Co-operative engaging educational courses and resources. Recent projects include: Nambucca Heads • publishing the Yaygirr dictionary and grammar • developing Certificate I and II courses in several languages • creating an online dictionary resources in partnership with First Voices, Canada • supporting language use in new domains including radio, songs, plays, festivals, and education and government departments • publishing Dhanggati and Gathang language learning resources with CDs Languages supported by Muurrbay - Many Rivers • videoing language, culture and stories of Bundjalung Elders • translating songs, prayers, speeches and signage projects. Muurrbay Aboriginal Language Many Rivers Aboriginal and Culture Co-operative Language Centre Ken Walker Gary Williams Anna Ash Chairperson Language Researcher Co-ordinator Phone: 0265 694 294 Phone: 0265 685 695 Fax: 0265 694 295 Fax: 0265 694 295 Mobile: 0488 126 875 Mobile: 0404 456 992 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Muurrbay Tree by Gumbaynggirr-Bundjalung 14 Bellwood Road artist Sharon Smith Nambucca Heads NSW 2448 www.muurrbay.org.au Muurrbay aims to support Aboriginal people, particularly Gumbaynggirr, in the revival Mandy Davis teaching the 2011 Great Lakes TAFE students.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistic Typology 2017; 21(1): 143–176
    Linguistic Typology 2017; 21(1): 143–176 Felicity Meakins* and Rachel Nordlinger Possessor dissension: Agreement mismatch in Ngumpin-Yapa possessive constructions DOI 10.1515/lingty-2017-0004 Received November 18, 2015; revised May 3, 2016 Abstract: In this article we describe a possessive construction in the Ngumpin- Yapa languages of Australia which has interesting implications for crosslinguis- tic models of agreement. In this “possessor dissension” construction, the pos- sessor NP remains a modifier within the larger possessive NP, yet both the possessor and the possessum are cross-referenced with clause-level agreement morphology. Thus, there is a type of morphosyntactic disagreement (or dissen- sion) between the syntactic position of the possessor as an NP-internal argument and its being agreed with at the clausal level as if it were a clausal argument. This phenomenon has had only limited mention in the typological literature, and has not previously been discussed for Australian languages. We discuss the properties of the construction, how it can be distinguished from other related construction types, and its implications for the typology of agreement. Keywords: agreement, alienable vs. inalienable possession, argument vs. adjunct, Australian, benefactive/malefactive, cross-reference, external possessor, morphol- ogy, Ngumpin-Yapa languages, possession, syntax 1 Introduction In this article we discuss a particular possessive construction found in Bilinarra, Gurindji, and other Ngumpin-Yapa languages of northern Australia, which we will refer to as “possessor dissension”.1 In this possessive 1 The term “possessor dissension” (cf. descent/dissent) is meant as a play on the term “possessor ascension” and reflects the dissonance in agreement insofar as the possessor is syntactically a modifier within the NP but is agreed with by the verb as if it were a clausal argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentations
    Presentations CHIE ADACHI AND VERONICA DOBSON community language planning within the context of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. She has immensely New ways of learning and teaching Arrente - enjoyed working on the development of online curriculum for developing language and culture course online Central and Eastern Arrernte language and culture with elders from Central Australia. The current paper explores ideas and issues around developing curriculum for learning and teaching of an Veronica Dobson is a highly respected elder from Central Indigenous Australian language. As part of a tertiary course Australia. She has extensively worked on the documentation at the newly established Australian Centre for Indigenous and revitalisation of Central and Eastern Arrernte language Knowledges and Education (ACIKE), the Central and Eastern and culture for many years as an educator. She was involved Arrernte language and culture curriculum has been developed. with establishing the orthography of this language. She also This paper presents a story of developing new ways of has extensive ecological knowledge of the land and takes great transmitting the Arrernte knowledge by creating multimode pride and joy in teaching this knowledge to young generations of learning and teaching space and incorporating the oral as well as non-indigenous people. tradition into non-traditional mode of online teaching with the For her significant contribution and services to the community Arrernte people. as a linguist, naturalist and ecologist, Veronica was appointed This paper also addresses the issues of: a Member of Order of Australia in 2011. She is an author of many books on Central and Eastern Arrernte language, land • Approaching and negotiating protocols to protect and and culture, and a figure that many people come across once share the Arrernte knowledge; they start learning about Arrernte.
    [Show full text]
  • Gumbaynggirr Language and Culture Nest
    Gumbaynggirr Language and Culture Nest Stage 1 Final Report Prepared for the Aboriginal Communities of Coffs Harbour, Grafton and Nambucca NSW. June 2018 Ilan Katz, Jan Idle, Shona Bates, Wendy Jopson, Michael Barnes This report belongs to the Aboriginal Communities of Coffs Harbour, Grafton and Nambucca. The Gumbaynggirr Language and Culture Nest operates on Gumbaynggirr Country. The evaluation team from the Social Policy Research Centre acknowledges the Gumbaynggirr peoples as the traditional custodians of the land we work on and pay our respect to Elders past, present and future and all Aboriginal people in the region. Acknowledgements We thank the Aboriginal Communities involved for their participation and support in this evaluation. We would like to thank Tony Dreise and Dr Lynette Riley – both members of the Evaluation Steering Committee – for reviewing the report. The OCHRE Evaluation was funded by Aboriginal Affairs NSW. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and may not reflect those of Aboriginal Affairs NSW or the New South Wales Government. We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Aboriginal Affairs NSW for their support. Evaluation Team Prof Ilan Katz, Michael Barnes, Shona Bates, Dr Jan Idle, Dr BJ Newton, Wendy Jopson For further information: Ilan Katz +61 2 9385 7800 Social Policy Research Centre UNSW Sydney NSW 2052 Australia T +61 2 9385 7800 F +61 2 9385 7838 E [email protected] W www.sprc.unsw.edu.au © UNSW Australia 2018 The Social Policy Research Centre is based in the Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences at UNSW Sydney. This report is an output of the OCHRE Evaluation, funded by Aboriginal Affairs NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • CAEPR WORKING PAPER No. 75/2010
    CENTRE FOR ABORIGINAL ECONOMIC POLICY RESEARCH Looking After Country in New South Wales: Two Case Studies of Socioeconomic Benefits for Aboriginal People J. Hunt CAEPR WORKING PAPER No. 75/2010 ANU COLLEGE OF ARTS & SOCIAL SCIENCES Series Note The Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research (CAEPR) was established at The Australian National University (ANU) in April 1990. Since 1 January 2010, CAEPR has operated as an academic unit within the Research School of Social Sciences in the College of Arts and Social Sciences at ANU. The Centre is funded from a variety of sources including ANU, Australian Research Council, industry and philanthropic partners, the Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs, and State and Territory governments. CAEPR’s principal objective is to undertake high-quality, independent research that will assist in furthering the social and economic development and empowerment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people throughout Australia. Its aim is to combine academic and teaching excellence on Indigenous economic and social development and public policy with realism, objectivity and relevance. CAEPR is Australia’s foremost social science research centre focusing on Indigenous economic and social policy from a national perspective. The Centre’s publications, which include the CAEPR Working Paper series established in 1999, aim to report on Indigenous circumstance, inform public debate, examine government policy, and influence policy formulation. Working Papers are often work-in-progress
    [Show full text]
  • Aboriginal Languages
    Aboriginal Languages Advice on Programming and Assessment for Stages 4 and 5 Acknowledgements The map on p 8 is © Department of Lands, Panorama Ave, Bathurst, NSW, www.lands.nsw.gov.au © 2003 Copyright Board of Studies NSW for and on behalf of the Crown in right of the State of New South Wales. This document contains Material prepared by the Board of Studies NSW for and on behalf of the State of New South Wales. The Material is protected by Crown copyright. All rights reserved. No part of the Material may be reproduced in Australia or in any other country by any process, electronic or otherwise, in any material form or transmitted to any other person or stored electronically in any form without the prior written permission of the Board of Studies NSW, except as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968. School students in NSW and teachers in schools in NSW may copy reasonable portions of the Material for the purposes of bona fide research or study. When you access the Material you agree: • to use the Material for information purposes only • to reproduce a single copy for personal bona fide study use only and not to reproduce any major extract or the entire Material without the prior permission of the Board of Studies NSW • to acknowledge that the Material is provided by the Board of Studies NSW • not to make any charge for providing the Material or any part of the Material to another person or in any way make commercial use of the Material without the prior written consent of the Board of Studies NSW and payment of the appropriate copyright fee • to include this copyright notice in any copy made • not to modify the Material or any part of the material without the express prior written permission of the Board of Studies NSW.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflexive and Reciprocal Encoding in the Australian Mixed
    languages Article Reflexive and Reciprocal Encoding in the Australian Mixed Language, Light Warlpiri Carmel O’Shannessy 1,* and Connor Brown 2 1 School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia 2 School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: Carmel.O’[email protected] Abstract: Mixed languages combine significant amounts of grammatical and lexical material from more than one source language in systematic ways. The Australian mixed language, Light Warlpiri, combines nominal morphology from Warlpiri with verbal morphology from Kriol (an English-lexified Creole) and English, with innovations. The source languages of Light Warlpiri differ in how they encode reflexives and reciprocals—Warlpiri uses an auxiliary clitic for both reflexive and reciprocal expression, while English and Kriol both use pronominal forms, and largely have separate forms for reflexives and reciprocals. English distinguishes person and number in reflexives, but not in reciprocals; the other source languages do not distinguish person or number. This study draws on naturalistic and elicited production data to examine how reflexive and reciprocal events are encoded in Light Warlpiri. The study finds that Light Warlpiri combines near-maximal distinctions from the source languages, but in a way that is not a mirror of any. It retains the person and number distinctions of English reflexives and extends them to reciprocals, using the same forms for Citation: O’Shannessy, Carmel, and reflexives and reciprocals (like Warlpiri). Reflexives and reciprocals occur within a verbal structure Connor Brown.
    [Show full text]
  • Typological Constraints on Verb Integration in Two Australian Mixed Languages1, 2
    Journal of Language Contact 5 (2012) 216–246 brill.com/jlc Typological constraints on verb integration in two Australian mixed languages1, 2 Felicity Meakinsa & Carmel O’Shannessyb, a) SLCCS, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, AUSTRALIA Corresponding author; [email protected] b) Department of Linguistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor MI 48109-1220, USA [email protected] Abstract Gurindji Kriol and Light Warlpiri are two mixed languages spoken in northern Australia by Gurindji and Warlpiri people, respectively. Both languages are the outcome of the fusion of a contact variety of English (Kriol/Aboriginal English) with a traditional Australian Aboriginal language (Gurindji or Warlpiri). The end result is two languages which show remarkable struc- tural similarity. In both mixed languages, pronouns, TMA auxiliaries and word order are derived from Kriol/Aboriginal English, and case-marking and other nominal morphology come from Gurindji or Warlpiri. These structural similarities are not surprising given that the mixed lan- guages are derived from typologically similar languages, Gurindji and Warlpiri (Ngumpin-Yapa, Pama-Nyungan), and share the Kriol/Aboriginal English component. Nonetheless, one of the more striking differences between the languages is the source of verbs. One third of the verbs in Gurindji Kriol is derived from Gurindji, whereas only seven verbs in Light Warlpiri are of Warlpiri origin. Additionally verbs of Gurindji origin in Gurindji Kriol are derived from cov- erbs, whereas the Warlpiri verbs in Light Warlpiri come from inflecting verbs. In this paper we claim that this difference is due to differences in the complex verb structure of Gurindji and Warlpiri, and the manner in which these complex verbs have interacted with the verb structure of Kriol/English in the formation of the mixed languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Code Switching and Mixed Language Genesis in Tiwi Author(S): Justin Spence Proceedings of the 38Th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2014), Pp
    Code Switching and Mixed Language Genesis in Tiwi Author(s): Justin Spence Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (2014), pp. 448-464 General Session and Thematic Session on Language Contact Editors: Kayla Carpenter, Oana David, Florian Lionnet, Christine Sheil, Tammy Stark, Vivian Wauters Please contact BLS regarding any further use of this work. BLS retains copyright for both print and screen forms of the publication. BLS may be contacted via http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/bls/ . The Annual Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society is published online via eLanguage , the Linguistic Society of America's digital publishing platform. Code Switching and Mixed Language Genesis in Tiwi JUSTIN SPENCE University of California, Davis Introduction A central issue in the study of mixed languages is the nature of their relationship to other language contact phenomena. Some scholars, notably Bakker (2003), have adopted the position that mixed languages are the result of autonomous processes of language mixing which operate independently of borrowing and code switching. However, McConvell and Meakins (2005) argue for the opposite view, demonstrating that the mixed language Gurindji Kriol has most plausibly arisen from grammaticization of pervasive code switching in a multilingual community. Building on this work, McConvell (2008) develops a “centre of gravity” model of mixed language genesis whereby some grammatical subsystems of a language are more robust than others and less likely to undergo replacement by morphemes from another language. A head-marking language will tend to retain its verbal subsystem in code-switched utterances, whereas a dependent-marking language will tend to retain its nominal subsystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers of the Linguistics Circle of Vol.1 No.2 June ,1981
    Papers of the Linguistics Circle of --~'~~~~~i! -"= ~-- ~..,;:""'~ ·_~~-'-~_k.· ....;. -~ ... WP VIeT 1/2 Vol. 1 No.2 June ,1981 - Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of Victoria Vol. 1 No. 2 The Linguistics Circle of Victoria is pleased to present the second number of the inaugural 1981 volume of Working Papers on current linguistic research in the community. The Circle, under the sponsorship of the Department 'of Linguistics, ~ncludes among its membership interested scholars from other departments at the University and other institutions in Victoria. The Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle is published semi-annually, normally one issue shortly after the end of the Fall term and another at the end of Spring. Publication of this f,irst volume has been made possible, in part, by a grant from the Graduate Students Society of the University of Victoria. The reader is advised that the articles appearing in the Working Papers vary in the degree to which they represent the au­ thors' final views on the matters under discussion. With this in mind, comments and suggestions on ideas set forth in these papers would be welcomed. While this first volume will be distributed free, it is our intention in future years to charge a modest subscription rate to try to recover some of the costs of publication. If you have found this first volume to be worthwhile and would like to contribute to the costs of its publication, we would be grateful for a volun­ tary contribution of ten dollars for 1981. The subscription rate - for the 1982 volume will also be ten dollars.
    [Show full text]