Notes on the Current Distribution, Threats and Conservation Status of a Poorly Known Cyprinid, Hypselobarbus Lithopidos (Day 1874) from the Western Ghats of India

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Notes on the Current Distribution, Threats and Conservation Status of a Poorly Known Cyprinid, Hypselobarbus Lithopidos (Day 1874) from the Western Ghats of India Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2013 | 5(13): 4743–4751 Western Ghats Special Series Communication ISSN Back from obscurity: notes on the current distribution, Online 0974–7907 threats and conservation status of a poorly known cyprinid, Print 0974–7893 Hypselobarbus lithopidos (Day, 1874) from the Western Ghats OPEN ACCESS of India Anvar Ali 1, Siby Philip 2 & Rajeev Raghavan 3 1,2,3 Conservation Research Group (CRG), St. Albert’s College, Kochi, Kerala 682018, India 2 Department of Zoology, Nirmalagiri College, Koothuparamba, Kerala 670701, India 3 Zoo Outreach Organization (ZOO), 96 Kumudham Nagar, Vilankurichi Road, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641035, India 1 [email protected],2 [email protected], 3 [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: Hypselobarbus lithopidos (Day, 1874) is a poorly known cyprinid fish endemic to the rivers of the Western Ghats of India. This species is assessed as Data Deficient in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species with a note that it could be possibly extinct. Here, we provide information on a recent collection of this species from the type locality, and discuss its current distribution, ecology, threats and conservation. A revised Red List status for the species is also proposed. Keywords: Canara barb, Endangered, Gonoproktopterus, Western Ghats. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3655.4743-51 | ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC9FED30-EE67-4203-BF7A-FF89150FBE0C Editor: Anonymity requested. Date of publication: 26 September 2013 (online & print) Manuscript details: Ms # o3655 | Received 07 June 2013 | Final received 10 September 2013 | Finally accepted 11 September 2013 Citation: Ali, A., S. Philip & R. Raghavan (2013). Back from obscurity: notes on the current distribution, threats and conservation status of a poorly known cyprinid, Hypselobarbus lithopidos (Day 1874) from the Western Ghats of India . Journal of Threatened Taxa 5(13): 4743-4751; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3655.4743-51 Copyright: © Ali et al. 2013. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication. Funding: Rajeev Raghavan thanks the Mohammed Bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund (MBZSCF; Project 1225670) and the North of England Zoological Society (NEZS), Chester Zoo for providing financial support for the project on the ‘Lost fishes of Western Ghats’. Competing Interest:The authors declare no competing interests. Funders had no role in study design, data collection, results interpretation and manuscript writing. Author Contribution: AA collected the specimens. RR, AA and SP carried out the analysis. RR and SP wrote the text. RR is the Principal Investigator of the project from which the data originated. Author Details: Anvar Ali interested in taxonomy and systematics of freshwater fishes of the Western Ghats. Siby Philip is interested in molecular phylogenet- ics, evolution and biogeography of freshwater fishes of the South Asia region. Rajeev Raghavan is interested in interdisciplinary research focused on generating information and developing methods to support conservation decision-making, especially in freshwater ecosystems Acknowledgements: Rajeev Raghavan thanks Ralf Britz, Natural History Museum, London for his help with the examination of Day’s materials, for photographs and useful discussions; Helmut Wellendorf, Natural History Museum, Vienna; Ronald de Ruiter, Naturalis, Leiden; Leo Smith and Kevin Swagel, Field Museum, Chicago; Rohan Pethiyagoda, Australian Museum, Sydney for information and photograph of the syntypes; Neelesh Dahanukar, IISER, Pune for help with relevant literature; J.D. Marcus Knight for useful discussions and Ambily Nair for her help and support. Local fishers in and around Sullia and Kasargod are thanked for the cooperation and help during the field work. The publication of this article is supported by the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF), a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the European Commission, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. 4743 Conservation status of Hypselobarbus lithopidos Ali et al. INTRODUCTION not provide this record, probably due to the lack of clarity in the species identification. There was also a In his paper on ‘Some new or little known fishes of general consensus within the working group that there India’ published in the Proceedings of the Zoological are no validated records of this species since 1941 (see Society of London, Francis Day (1874) described Raghavan & Ali 2011). five new species of fish, one of which was Barbus Similarly, Arunachalam et al. (2012; pp. 70 and 71) (= Hypselobarbus) lithopidos, from South Canara (= in their revision of the genus Hypselobarbus records Dakshina Kannada). The fish was known to attain up to collecting H. lithopidos from the Shimoga fish farm and 24 inches in length and was considered ‘not uncommon’ Rusewalai (= Rosemalai?) fish farm. They also provide in rivers of the region (Day 1878, 1889). A specimen illustrations for these materials (see figure 1A p 64 and measuring 7.4 inches long was illustrated by Day (1878) figure 3A p 66 of Arunachalam et al. 2012). However, in his book on the Fishes of India; being a natural history these are clear misidentifications as the material of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and fresh waters illustrated in p 64 has a lateral line scale count of 30–31, of India, Burma, and Ceylon. while the material in p 66 has a lateral line scale count From 1909 until 1975, several collections of H. of 34–36. Hypselobarbus lithopidos has a lateral line lithopidos were made from the rivers of the southern scale count of 37–39 (Day 1874; Knight et al. 2013; also part of the Western Ghats flowing through the states of see Table 2). Raghavan & Ali (2011) also suggested that Kerala and Karnataka (see table 1), after which there were the record of H. lithopidos by Arunachalam et al. (2000) no records of the species. The absence of H. lithopidos from Kal River in the Konkan region of Maharashtra in collections from a region which has been the focus of requires verification. This suggestion might hold true several comprehensive field surveys (Easa & Basha 1995; as the record of H. lithopidos from Kal River, did not Chapgar & Mankadan 2000; Kurup et al. 2004; Thomas find a mention in a recent paper by the same authors 2004; Biju 2005) led to the assumption that the species (Arunachalam et al. 2012). might probably be extinct (see Raghavan & Ali 2011). Recently (Knight et al. 2013) re-discovered H. Although several recent papers (Arunachalam et lithopidos based on collections from the Phalguni River al. 2000; Vijaykumar et al. 2008; Ahmad et al. 2013; in Dakshin Kannada District of Karnataka State, laying to Vijaylaxmi & Vijaykumar 2011; Arunachalam et al. rest the speculation that the species is extinct. As part 2012) mentioned collecting H. lithopidos, these need of the on-going project on the ‘lost fishes of Western to be verified as no voucher specimens are available. Ghats’, we obtained specimens of H. lithopidos (Image Ahmad et al. (2013) listed H. lithopidos as occurring in 1) from an additional river system, part of the erstwhile Hariharapura in the Tunga drainage. However, one of the South Canara region, its type locality. This paper serves authors of the paper who was part of the Cypriniformes to document this additional record, and discuss the working group that evaluated the conservation status current distribution, threats and conservation status of of the Hypselobarbus species from Western Ghats in this species. We also propose a revised Red List status 2010 for the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species did for H. lithopidos. © Rajeev Raghavan © Rajeev Image 1. Hypselobarbus lithopidos CRG-SAC.2013.3 collected from Chandragiri River, Kerala 4744 Journal of Threatened Taxa | www.threatenedtaxa.org | 26 September 2013 | 5(13): 4743–4751 Conservation status of Hypselobarbus lithopidos Ali et al. MATERIALS AND METHODS Table 1. Records of Hypselobarbus lithopidos from the Western Ghats Materials examined: Barbus lithopidos Francis Day, Location Collected by Reference BMNH 1889.2.1.559-561, 3 exs., 124.72–171.42 mm SL, South Canara1 Francis Day Day (1874, 1878, 1889) South Canara, India (Image 2); Hypselobarbus lithopidos, Nimutai (Travancore2) Annandale Jenkins (1909) CRG-SAC.2013.3.1-5, 10.iii.2013; 5 exs., 49.63–60.93 Trivandrum S.N. Pillay Pillay (1929) mm SL, Pallamkode, 12.5640N & 75.2460E, Chandragiri Trivandrum S.N. Pillay John (1936) River system, Kerala, India, Anvar Ali. Coorg (Cauvery River)* Hora Hora (1937) Museum abbreviations: AMS - Australian Museum, Sydney; BMNH - Natural History Museum, London; CRG- Nilambur (River Chaliyar) B.S. Raj Raj (1941) * SAC - Conservation Research Group, St. Albert’s College, Bhadravati (River Bhadra) David David (1956) Kochi; FMNH - Field Museum, Chicago; NMW - Natural Periyar Tiger Reserve - Indra & Remadevi (1990) Manakkavala (Periyar Tiger History Museum, Vienna; RMNH - Naturalis, Leiden; R.S. Pillai Jayaram (1991) Reserve) ZSI-SRS - Zoological Survey of India, Southern Regional Khal River (Maharashtra) Arunachalam Arunachalam et al. (2000) Station, Chennai. Kagina River (Karnataka)* - Vijaykumar et al. (2008) Photographs and X-ray: Barbus lithopidos Francis Vijaylaxmi & Vijaykumar Bheema River (Karnataka)*
Recommended publications
  • Environment Management Plan for Thalassery
    PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF KERALA KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT - II ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THALASSERY-KALARODE ROAD (CONTRACT III-A) JUNE2015 Kerala State Transport Project II EMP for Thalassery Kalarode Road TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION. 1.1 1.1.ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) PROCESS ................................. 1.1 1.2.OBJECTIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN (EMP).... 1.2 1.3.UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS OF PROJECT LOCATION-KERALA ...................... .................................................... 1.2 1.4.ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT ............... ........................................................ 1.3 1.5.METHODOLOGY OF PREPARING EMP . ............................................................... 1.4 1.6.DEFINITION OF TERMS USED IN THE PROJECT . ................................................................. 1.6 CHAPTER 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 2.1.REGIONAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT ROAD 2.1 2.2. LINK DESCRIPTION. 2.1 2.3. PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS ........ 2.9 2.4.ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT MEASURES ADOPTED IN THE PROJECT. 2.9 CHAPTER 3. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN . 3.1 CHAPTER 4. ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EMAP ... 4.1 4.1.ORGANISATION, STAFFING AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF PMT ............................................................................ 4.1 4.2. ORGANISATION, STAFFING AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISING CONSULTANT (CSC)4.4 4.3. ORGANISATION, STAFFING AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Morphometric Comparison of Abu Mullet, Planiliza Abu (Heckel, 1843) Populations in Bushehr Basin, Iran
    Tanzania Journal of Science 47(1): 1-9, 2021 ISSN 0856-1761, e-ISSN 2507-7961 © College of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Dar es Salaam, 2021 Geometric Morphometric Comparison of Abu Mullet, Planiliza abu (Heckel, 1843) Populations in Bushehr Basin, Iran Fatemeh Shabaninejad1, Yazdan Keivany1* and Dara Bagheri2 1Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, 84156-83111, Iran 2Department of Fisheries, Faculty of Marine Science and Technology, Persian Gulf University, P. O. Box 75615-415 Bushehr, Iran Co-authors’ e-mails: [email protected] (Shabaninejad); [email protected]; [email protected] (Bagheri) *Corresponding author, e-mail addresses: [email protected]; [email protected] Received 24 Oct 2020, Revised 21 Dec 2020, Accepted 28 Dec 2020, Published Feb 2021 Abstract Many fish behavior and habitats could be defined based on the fish morphology, thus, using the fish body shape, in addition to its genetic characteristics, could be used to infer the type of fish habitat and its characteristics. This study aimed to compare the body shapes of five populations of abu mullet, Planiliza abu (Heckel, 1843), in Bushehr basin using geometric morphometric method. Some 162 specimens from Hendijan, Genaveh, Helleh, Kaki and Mond rivers were used. Three morphometric characters, total length (TL), fork length (FL) and standard length (SL) were measured. Samples were photographed from the left side, then 18 landmarks were digitized using ImageJ software. Data obtained from Procrustes were analyzed by multivariate analysis using PCA and CVA. The results of PCA analysis showed significant differences between Kaki and other populations (P < 0.0001).
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Freshwater Fish Fauna of West Bengal, India with Suggestions for Conservation of the Threatened and Endemic Species
    OCC SIO L PA ER NO. 263 Records of the Zoolog·cal Survey of India A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India w·th suggestions for · conservation of the threatened­ and endemic species R. P. BARMAN ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF IND A OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 263 RECORDS OF THE ZOOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India with suggestions for conservation i o( the threatened and endemic species R.P.BARMAN Zoological Survey of India, F.P.S. Building, Kolkata-700 016 Edited by the Director, ZoolQ.§iaJl Survey of India, Kolkata ~ Jl'lfif Zoological Survey of India Kolkata CITATION Barman, R. P. 2007. A review of the freshwater fish fauna of West Bengal, India with suggestions for conservation of the threatened and endemic species. Rec. zool. Sllr~'. India, Oce. Paper No~, 263 : 1-48 (Published by the Director, Zoo I. Surv. India, Kolkata) Published: May, 2007 ISBN 978-81-8171-147-2 © Governl11enl of India, 2007 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. • This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade, be lent. re-sold hired out or otherwise disposed of without the publisher's consent, in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published. • The correct price of this publication is the price printed on this page.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological and Genetic Evidence for Multiple Evolutionary Distinct
    Morphological and Genetic Evidence for Multiple Evolutionary Distinct Lineages in the Endangered and Commercially Exploited Red Lined Torpedo Barbs Endemic to the Western Ghats of India Lijo John1,2., Siby Philip3,4,5., Neelesh Dahanukar6,7, Palakkaparambil Hamsa Anvar Ali5, Josin Tharian8, Rajeev Raghavan5,7,9,10*, Agostinho Antunes3,4* 1 Marine Biotechnology Division, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI), Kochi, India, 2 Export Inspection Agency (EIA), Kochi, India, 3 CIMAR/CIIMAR, Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigac¸a˜o Marinha e Ambiental, Rua dos Bragas, Porto, Portugal, 4 Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Cieˆncias, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, Porto, Portugal, 5 Conservation Research Group (CRG), St. Albert’s College, Kochi, India, 6 Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER), Pune, India, 7 Zoo Outreach Organization (ZOO), Coimbatore, India, 8 Department of Zoology, St. John’s College, Anchal, Kerala, India, 9 Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom, 10 Research Group Zoology: Biodiversity & Toxicology, Center for Environmental Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium Abstract Red lined torpedo barbs (RLTBs) (Cyprinidae: Puntius) endemic to the Western Ghats Hotspot of India, are popular and highly priced freshwater aquarium fishes. Two decades of indiscriminate exploitation for the pet trade, restricted range, fragmented populations and continuing decline in quality of habitats has resulted in their ‘Endangered’ listing. Here, we tested whether the isolated RLTB populations demonstrated considerable variation qualifying to be considered as distinct conservation targets. Multivariate morphometric analysis using 24 size-adjusted characters delineated all allopatric populations. Similarly, the species-tree highlighted a phylogeny with 12 distinct RLTB lineages corresponding to each of the different riverine populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Cantor's Giant Softshell Turtle, Pelochelys Cantorii
    M Cantor’s Giant Softshell turtle, Pelochelys cantorii Compiler: Ayushi Jain Suggested citation: Jain, A., Das, A., V. Deepak., Cavada-Blanco, F. 2021. A Survival Blueprint for the Cantor’s Giant Softshell Turtle Pelochelys cantorii in India. EDGE of Existence programme, Zoological Society of London, UK 1. STATUS REVIEW 1.1 Taxonomy: Class : Reptilia Order : Testudines Family : Trionychidae Genus : Pelochelys Species : Pelocheys cantorii (Gray, 1864) Common Name : Cantor’s Giant softshell turtle/ Asian Giant softshell turtle/ Local name : Bheemanama, Paala poovan (Malayalam) Synonyms: Pelochelys clivepalmeri (Hoser, 2014), P. cumingii (Gray, 1864), P. poljakowii (Strauch, 1890), P. telstraorum (Hoser, 2014), P. cantoris (Boulenger, 1889) Pelochelys cantorii (Gray, 1864) is one of the three species in the genus Pelochelys. The other two species are P. bibroni and P. signifera known only from Papua New Guinea and Indonesia (Papua), respectively. P. cantorii has a large distribution across south and south-east Asia (Das, 2008). It is among the largest freshwater turtles in the world with adults reaching a carapace length of around 100 cm (Das, 2008). Sexual dimorphism is present with males having longer and thicker tales than females; something common for other softshell turtles. Females are also larger in size than males (Das, 2008). According to the last IUCN Red List of threatened species assessment for the species, Pelochelys cantorii might hide a complex of several different species (ATTWG, 2000) A B Figure 1. An adult Pelochelys cantorii on the banks of Chandragiri river caught as by-catch in a fishing line (A), and a close-up head shot showing the keratinized sheath or “teeth” of the species (B).
    [Show full text]
  • Tourist Statistics 2019 (Book)
    KERALA TOURISM STATISTICS 2019 RESEARCH AND STATISTICS DIVISION DEPARTMENT of TOURISM GOVERNMENT OF KERALA DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM KERALA TOURISM STATISTICS 2019 Prepared by RESEARCH & STATISTICS DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM Sri.KADAKAMPALLY SURENDRAN Minister for Devaswoms, Tourism and Co-Operation, Kerala Ph (Office): 0471-2336605, 2334294 Thiruvananthapuram MESSAGE Kerala is after all India’s most distinguished state. This land of rare natural beauty is steeped in history and culture, but it has still kept up with the times, Kerala has taken its tourism very seriously. It is not for nothing than that the Eden in these tropics; God’s own country was selected by National Geographic Traveler as one of its 50 “destination of life time”. When it comes to building a result oriented development programme, data collection is key in any sector. To capitalize the opportunity to effectively bench mark, it is essential to collect data’s concerned with the matter. In this context statistical analysis of tourist arrivals to a destination is gaining importance .We need to assess whether the development of destination is sufficient to meet the requirements of visiting tourists. Our plan of action should be executed in a meticulous manner on the basis of the statistical findings. Kerala Tourism Statistics 2019 is another effort in the continuing process of Kerala Tourism to keep a tab up-to-date data for timely action and effective planning, in the various fields concerned with tourism. I wish all success to this endeavor. Kadakampally Surendran MESSAGE Kerala Tourism has always attracted tourists, both domestic and foreign with its natural beauty and the warmth and hospitality of the people of Kerala.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. History Kasaragod, the northernmost district of Kerala, is endowed with rich natural resources and is noted for its majestic forts, ravishing rivers, hills, green valleys and beautiful beaches. The rich and varied cultural heritage of the district is portrayed through spectacular presentations of Theyyam, Yakshagana, Poorakkali, Kolkali and Mappilappattu. Seven languages are prevalent in Kasaragod. Malayalam is the administrative language. Other languages are Kannada, Tulu, Konkani, Marati, Urdu and Beary.Prior to State reorganization, Kasaragod was part of the South Kanara district.Kasaragod became a part of Malabar district following the reorganization of States and formation of unified Kerala State. Later, Kasaragod Taluk of Malabar district was bifurcated in to Kasaragod and Hosdurg Taluks and integrated with the then newly formed Cannanore district. Kasaragod became part of Kerala following the re-organization of states and formation of Kerala in 1st November 1956.The district was Kasaragod Taluk in Kannur District.The formation of Kasaragod district was a long felt ambition of the people.It is with the intention of bestowing maximum attention on the development of backward area, Kasaragod district was formed on 24th May,1984 as per GO (MS)No.520/84/RD, Dated 19.05.1984 by taking Kasaragod and Hosdurg taluks from the then Kannur district.The name Kasaragod is said to be derived from the word Kasaragod which means Nuxvemied Forest(Kanjirakuttam). 1.2. Physiography Kasaragod is bounded on the north and the east by Dakshina Kannada and Coorg districts of Karnataka State, on the south by Kannur district and on the west by the Lakshadweep Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbooks Kerala
    district handbooks of kerala CANNANORE DIREtTORATE OF , roBLICRElATIONS DISTRICT HANDBOOKS OF KERALA CANNANORE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC RELATIONS Sli). NaticBttl Systems VuiU Naiiori-I Institute of Educational Planning and A ministration 1 7 -B.StiAV V 'ndo CONTENTS Page 1. Short history of Cannanore 1 2. Topography and Climate 2 3. Religions 3 4 . Customs and Manners 6 5. Kalari 7 6. Industries 8 7. Animal Husbandry 9 8. Special Agricultural Development Unit 9 9. Fisheries 10 10. Communication and Transport 11 11. Education 11 12. Medical Facilities 11 13. Forests 12 14 , Professional and Technical Institutions 13 15. Religious Institutions 14 16 . Places of Interest 16 17 . District at a glance 21 18 . Blocks and Panchayats 22 PART I Cannanore is the anglicised form oF the Malayalam word “ Karinur” . According to one view “ Kannur” is the variation of Kanathur, an ancient village, the name of which survive even today in ont! of the wards of Canna­ nore MunicipaUty. Perhaps, like several other ancient towns of Kerala, Cannanore also is named after one of the deities of the Hindu Pantheon. Thus “ Kannur” is the compound of the two words ‘Kannan’ meaning Lord Kris;hna, and TJr’ meaning place, the place of Lord Krishna, Short history of Cannanore Cannanore, the northernmost district of Kerala State, is constituted of territories which formed part of the erst­ while district ol' Malabar and South Ganara, prior to the rc-organisation of the States in 1956. Cannanore district was formed on January 1, 1957 by trifurcating the erstwhile Malabar district of the former Madras State. The district has a distinct history of its own which is in many rcspects independent of the history of other regions oi the State.
    [Show full text]
  • Page Front 1-12.Pmd
    REPORT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF KASARAGOD DISTRICT Dr. P. Prabakaran October, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS No. Topic Page No. Preface ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 PART-I LAW AND ORDER *(Already submitted in July 2012) ............................................ 9 PART - II DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVE 1. Background ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Development Sectors 2. Agriculture ................................................................................................................................................. 47 3. Animal Husbandry and Dairy Development.................................................................................. 113 4. Fisheries and Harbour Engineering................................................................................................... 133 5. Industries, Enterprises and Skill Development...............................................................................179 6. Tourism .................................................................................................................................................. 225 Physical Infrastructure 7. Power .................................................................................................................................................. 243 8. Improvement of Roads and Bridges in the district and development
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015
    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • KASARAGOD DISTRICT HAND BOOKS of KERALA D10844.Pdf
    ^ Sii B3S 310 KBR -J) DISTRICT HAND BOOKS OF KERALA KASARAGOD Di084i4 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC RFXATIONS, GOVERNtVfENT OF KERALA 32/165/97—1 KASARAGOD Department of Public Relations October 1997 N ati Plaoit Editor-in-chief 17*B, L. (t L. Natarajan I.A.S n rv -'v i* ’ T )-lh 5 ? U U Director of Public Relations 0 ^ ’ ^ ----- ' * Compiled by R. Ramachandran Dist. Information Officer, Kasaragod Editor M. Josephath (Information Officer, Planning & Development) Asst. Editor Xavier Primus Raj an M.R. (Asst. Infomiation Officcr, Planning & Development) Cover E. S. Varghese Published by the Director, Department of Public Relations, Government of Kerala. Copies : 10,000 Not for Sale Contents Introduction.................................................................................5 A Short History ......................................................................... 5 T opography..............................................................................7 C lim ate......................................................................................... 8 F o re s t........... ................................................................................8 R iv ers............................................................................................8 P o p u latio n ...................................................................................9 A dm in istratio n ...............................:......... .......................... 1 1 A griculture............................................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • Kerala History Timeline
    Kerala History Timeline AD 1805 Death of Pazhassi Raja 52 St. Thomas Mission to Kerala 1809 Kundara Proclamation of Velu Thampi 68 Jews migrated to Kerala. 1809 Velu Thampi commits suicide. 630 Huang Tsang in Kerala. 1812 Kurichiya revolt against the British. 788 Birth of Sankaracharya. 1831 First census taken in Travancore 820 Death of Sankaracharya. 1834 English education started by 825 Beginning of Malayalam Era. Swatithirunal in Travancore. 851 Sulaiman in Kerala. 1847 Rajyasamacharam the first newspaper 1292 Italiyan Traveller Marcopolo reached in Malayalam, published. Kerala. 1855 Birth of Sree Narayana Guru. 1295 Kozhikode city was established 1865 Pandarappatta Proclamation 1342-1347 African traveller Ibanbatuta reached 1891 The first Legislative Assembly in Kerala. Travancore formed. Malayali Memorial 1440 Nicholo Conti in Kerala. 1895-96 Ezhava Memorial 1498 Vascoda Gama reaches Calicut. 1904 Sreemulam Praja Sabha was established. 1504 War of Cranganore (Kodungallor) be- 1920 Gandhiji's first visit to Kerala. tween Cochin and Kozhikode. 1920-21 Malabar Rebellion. 1505 First Portuguese Viceroy De Almeda 1921 First All Kerala Congress Political reached Kochi. Meeting was held at Ottapalam, under 1510 War between the Portuguese and the the leadership of T. Prakasam. Zamorin at Kozhikode. 1924 Vaikom Satyagraha 1573 Printing Press started functioning in 1928 Death of Sree Narayana Guru. Kochi and Vypinkotta. 1930 Salt Satyagraha 1599 Udayamperoor Sunahadhos. 1931 Guruvayur Satyagraha 1616 Captain Keeling reached Kerala. 1932 Nivarthana Agitation 1663 Capture of Kochi by the Dutch. 1934 Split in the congress. Rise of the Leftists 1694 Thalassery Factory established. and Rightists. 1695 Anjengo (Anchu Thengu) Factory 1935 Sri P. Krishna Pillai and Sri.
    [Show full text]