DOCSLIB.ORG

Progress of Self-Reliance in East Sudan Operation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Progress of Self-Reliance in East Sudan Operation Country: SUDAN Programme Title: UNDP / UNHCR TRANSITIONAL SOLUTIONS INITIATIVE JOINT PROGRAMME FOR REFUGEES AND THEIR HOST COMMUNITIES, EASTERN SUDAN (PHASE 1) Joint Programme Outcome: UNDAF Outcome (3) By 2012, poverty, especially amongst vulnerable groups is reduced and equitable economic growth is increased through improvements in livelihoods, decent employment opportunities, food security, sustainable natural resource management and self reliance Joint Programme Goal: Enhance self-reliance, reduce aid dependency and assist the socio- economic integration of both refugees and host communities by restoring and expanding sustainable livelihoods opportunities Programme Duration: 3 Years Total estimated budget*: US$ 44,846,910 Out of which: Anticipated start/end dates: 1.1.2012 to 31.12.2014 1. Funded Budget: US$ 5,900,000 Fund Management Option(s): Pass-through 2. Unfunded budget: US$ 39,246,910 Sources of funded budget: Managing or Administrative Agent: ___________ * Total estimated budget includes both programme costs and indirect support costs (if/as applicable) Government of Norway: US$ 1,600,000 IKEA Foundation: US$ 4,000,000 UNDP: US$ 300,000 UN organizations National Coordinating Authorities Name of Representative Name of Head of Partner Signature Signature U nited Nations High Commissioner for Ministry of International Cooperation Refugees Date & Seal Date & Seal Name of Representative Name of Head of Partner Signature Signature United Nations Development Programme Commission of Refugees Date & Seal Date & Seal Name of Head of Partner Signature Government of Gadaref State Date & Seal Name of Head of Partner Signature Government of Kassala State Date& Seal 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 3 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 7 I. SITUATION ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 10 Context .............................................................................................................................................. 10 Local Population ................................................................................................................................ 11 Displaced persons ............................................................................................................................. 11 II. RATIONALE FOR THE JOINT PROGRAMME ....................................................................................... 13 III. STRATEGY ......................................................................................................................................... 15 Goals ................................................................................................................................................. 15 Outputs ............................................................................................................................................. 17 Output 1: Vocational capacities and business skills enhanced .................................................. 17 Output 2: Community access to Basic social services, (Health, Education and Watsan) ............. 18 Output 3: Protection services and legal support strengthened ................................................... 19 Output 4: Rural Livelihoods opportunities for Refugees and Host Communities Diversified and improved ....................................................................................................................................... 20 Output 5: Access to Microfinance Services Enhanced .................................................................. 21 Output 6: Capacities for Environment management and energy conservation are developed. .. 22 Output 7: Promote women empowerment, peaceful coexistence and Social Cohesion ............. 22 Output 8: Institutional capacity building for decentralized governance (UNDP) ......................... 23 Partnerships ...................................................................................................................................... 24 Partners to the Joint Programme.................................................................................................. 24 Linkages to Other Initiatives ......................................................................................................... 25 Programme Principles ....................................................................................................................... 26 Phased Area-based approach ........................................................................................................... 28 3 Sustainability ..................................................................................................................................... 29 IV. Results framework ........................................................................................................................... 31 V. Management and Coordination ....................................................................................................... 61 Programme Board ............................................................................................................................. 61 The Technical Steering Committee ................................................................................................... 62 The Programme Manager ................................................................................................................. 62 Programme Technical and Operational Support .............................................................................. 62 VI. Fund Management .......................................................................................................................... 63 VII. Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting ........................................................................................... 64 M&E .................................................................................................................................................. 64 Reporting .......................................................................................................................................... 65 Legal Context of Basis of Relationship .................................................................................................. 68 Work Plans and Budgets ....................................................................................................................... 70 Figures Figure 1. Transitional Solutions Initiative Joint Programme Organogram ............................................ 61 Tables Table 1. Beneficiaries ............................................................................................................................ 16 4 ACRONYMS ACORD Agency for Cooperation and Research in Development AGDM Age, Gender and Diversity Mainstreaming CBO Community Based Organisation COR Commissioner of Refugees ESCO El Sugya Charity Organisation ESPA East Sudan Peace Agreement ESRDF Eastern Recovery and Development Fund FNC Forestry National Cooperation HAI Human Appeal International JAM Joint Assessment Mission NGO Non-Governmental Organisation INGO International Non-Governmental Organisation MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoARF Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries MoF Ministry of Finance M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MIC Ministry of International Cooperation MDG Millennium Development Goals MoSW Ministry of Social Welfare PB Peace Building SOLO Sudan Opening Learning Organisation SRC Sudanese Red Crescent UN United Nations UNICEF United Nations Education Fund for Children UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Fund 5 UNDP United Nations Development Program UNHCR United Nations High Commission for Refugees WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organisation VT Vocational Training TSI Transitional Solutions Initiative 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rationale and Strategy Protracted and post-conflict displacements pose both humanitarian and development challenges. Resolving them requires a more coherent and effective approach to the durable solutions of refugees, returnees, internally displaced persons, and their host communities. To find genuine solutions that end dependency on humanitarian aid and advance human development humanitarian, development actors and local governments must coordinate efforts to capitalize on their different areas of expertise and combine bilateral and multilateral assistance. The Transitional Solutions Initiative (TSI) provides a framework for transitioning displacement situations to durable solutions. As a partnership between humanitarian and development actors the TSI prioritizes effective inter-agency partnerships, with specially tailored area-specific interventions to increase self-reliance. Projects are designed to benefit the host populations as well as the displaced, and have a strong component of national ownership and capacity building of local government; without which sustainable solutions would be impossible. The TSI in Eastern Sudan is multifaceted targeting the twelve refugee camps and one IDP camp in a phased approach aiming to consolidate camps and convert them
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sudan/Eritrea Emergency, May - July 2000
    UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR REFUGEES EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS UNIT The Sudan/Eritrea emergency, May - July 2000 An evaluation of UNHCR’s response EPAU/2001/03 By Arafat Jamal February 2001 Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit UNHCR’s Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit (EPAU) is committed to the systematic examination and assessment of UNHCR policies, programmes, projects and practices. EPAU also promotes rigorous research on issues related to the work of UNHCR and encourages an active exchange of ideas and information between humanitarian practitioners, policymakers and the research community. All of these activities are undertaken with the purpose of strengthening UNHCR’s operational effectiveness, thereby enhancing the organization’s capacity to fulfil its mandate on behalf of refugees and other displaced people. The work of the unit is guided by the principles of transparency, independence, consultation and relevance. Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Case Postale 2500 CH-1211 Geneva 2 Dépôt Switzerland Tel: (41 22) 739 8249 Fax: (41 22) 739 7344 e-mail: [email protected] internet: www.unhcr.org All EPAU evaluation reports are placed in the public domain. Electronic versions are posted on the UNHCR website and hard copies can be obtained by contacting EPAU. They may be quoted, cited and copied, provided that the source is acknowledged. The views expressed in EPAU publications are not necessarily those of UNHCR. The designations and maps used do not imply the expression of any opinion or recognition on the part of UNHCR concerning the legal status of a territory or of its authorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints in the Market Chains for Export of Sudanese Sheep and Sheep Meat to the Middle East
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE ILRI provided by CGSpace International Livestock Research Institute Research Report 16 Constraints in the market chains for export of Sudanese sheep and sheep meat to the Middle East ISBN 92–9146–195–4 Constraints in the market chains for export of Sudanese sheep and sheep meat to the Middle East Omar Hassan el Dirani, Mohammad A Jabbar and Babiker Idris Babiker Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries ILRI International Livestock Research Institute INTERNATIONAL LIVESTOCK RESEARCH INSTITUTE i Authors’ affiliations Omar Hassan el Dirani, Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries, Government of Sudan, Khartoum, the Sudan Mohammad A Jabbar, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya Babiker Idris Babiker, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, the Sudan © 2009 ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute). All rights reserved. Parts of this publication may be reproduced for non-commercial use provided that such reproduction shall be subject to acknowledgement of ILRI as holder of copyright. Editing, design and layout—ILRI Publications Unit, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. ISBN 92–9146–195–4 Correct citation: el Dirani OH, Jabbar MA and Babiker IB. 2009. Constraints in the market chains for export of Sudanese sheep and sheep meat to the Middle East. Research Report 16. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, the Sudan, and ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi,
    [Show full text]
  • Sudan Country Statement: Addressing Migrant Smuggling and Human Trafficking in East Africa
    Sudan Country Statement: Addressing Migrant Smuggling and Human Trafficking in East Africa SUDAN COUNTRY STATEMENT ADDRESSING MIGRANT SMUGGLING AND HUMAN TRAFFICKING IN EAST AFRICA September 2017 This report is one of 10 country statement reports covering: Djibouti, Egypt, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan, Sudan, Uganda and Yemen a FUNDED BY THE EU Sudan Country Statement: Addressing Migrant Smuggling and Human Trafficking in East Africa b Sudan Country Statement: Addressing Migrant Smuggling and Human Trafficking in East Africa Sudan Country Statement: Addressing Migrant Smuggling and Human Trafficking in East Africa c Sudan Country Statement: Addressing Migrant Smuggling and Human Trafficking in East Africa This report is one of a series of ten country statements, produced as part of the project ‘Addressing Mixed Migration Flows in Eastern Africa’, funded by the European Commission (EC) and implemented by Expertise France. The overall project consists of three components: • Assisting national authorities in setting up or strengthening safe and rights-respectful reception offices for migrants/asylum seekers/refugees. • Supporting and facilitating the fight against criminal networks through capacity building and assistance to partner countries in developing evidence-based policies and conducting criminal investigations, most notably by collecting and analysing information about criminal networks along migration routes. • Supporting local authorities and NGOs in the provision of livelihoods and self-reliance opportunities for displaced persons and host communities in the neighbouring host countries. As part of the second component, Expertise France contracted the Regional Mixed Migration Secretariat (RMMS) in Nairobi to implement the project ‘Contributing to enhanced data collection systems and information sharing on criminal networks involved in facilitating irregular migration in the Eastern Africa region’.
    [Show full text]
  • Ii. Livestock Marketing
    48418 Public Disclosure Authorized Support From: SUDAN MULTI-DONOR TRUST FUNDS MDTF-National Sector Policy Note Livestock Marketing in Eastern and Central Sudan Public Disclosure Authorized Babiker Idris Public Disclosure Authorized December 31, 2007 Multi Donor Trust Fund-National Technical Secretariat The World Bank Khartoum Public Disclosure Authorized MDTF Donors: SUDAN MULTI DONOR TRUST FUNDS MDTF-National Sector Policy Note Livestock Marketing in Eastern and Central Sudan Babiker Idris Multi Donor Trust Fund-National Technical Secretariat The World Bank Khartoum ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AOAD Arab Organisation for Agricultural Development ARSC Animal Resources Service Company CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement FAO Food and Agricultural Organization FNC Forest National Corporation FOB (also f.o.b.) Free on Board DTIS Diagnostic Trade Integration Study GAC Gum Arabic Corporation GDP Gross Domestic Product GNU Sudan Government of National Unity GOS Government of Sudan HPS Hand Picked Selected IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development JAM Joint Assessment Mission JECFA Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives MDTF Multi-Donor Trust Fund MDTF–N Multi-Donor Trust Fund - National MDTF–S Multi-Donor Trust Fund - South MFNE Ministry of Finance and National Economy (GNU) MFT Ministry of Foreign Trade (GNU) MT Metric Ton OC Oversight Committee RVT Rift Valley Fever SC Sudan Consortium SDD Sudanese Dinars SDG Sudanese Pounds SPLM Sudanese People Liberation Movement SR Saudi Riyal SSA Sub-Saharan Africa TLU Tropical Livestock Unit
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial and Temporal Variation of Precipitation in Sudan and Their Possible Causes During 1948–2005
    Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess (2012) 26:429–441 DOI 10.1007/s00477-011-0512-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Spatial and temporal variation of precipitation in Sudan and their possible causes during 1948–2005 Zengxin Zhang • Chong-Yu Xu • Majduline El-Haj El-Tahir • Jianrong Cao • V. P. Singh Published online: 3 July 2011 Ó The Author(s) 2011. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Temporal and spatial patterns of precipitation Southwest; (2) precipitation of the main rain season, i.e., are essential to the understanding of soil moisture status July, August and September, and annual total precipitation which is vital for vegetation regeneration in the arid eco- in the central part of Sudan decreased significantly during systems. The purposes of this study are (1) to understand 1948–2005; (3) abrupt change points were found in the the temporal and spatial variations of precipitation in annual, July, August and September in the late 1960s, when Sudan during 1948–2005 by using high quality global precipitation decreased more rapidly than in other periods; precipitation data known as Precipitation REConstruction and (4) the decreasing precipitation was associated with the (PREC), which has been constructed at the National Oce- weakening African summer monsoon. The summer mois- anic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Climate ture flux over Sudan tended to be decreasing after the late Prediction Center, and (2) to discuss the relationship 1960s which decreased the northward propagation of between precipitation variability and moisture flux based moisture flux in North Africa. This study provides a on the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data in order to ascertain complementary view to the previous studies that attempted the potential causes of the spatial and temporal variations to explain the Sahel persistent drought and possible causes.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Dengue Fever Virus Antibodies and Associated Risk Factors Among Residents of El-Gadarif State, Sudan Mawahib H
    Eldigail et al. BMC Public Health (2018) 18:921 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5853-3 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Prevalence of dengue fever virus antibodies and associated risk factors among residents of El-Gadarif state, Sudan Mawahib H. Eldigail1, Gamal K. Adam2, Rabie A. Babiker2, Fatima Khalid3, Ibrahim A. Adam1, Osama H. Omer1, Mohamed E. Ahmed4, Sara L. Birair4, Eltahir M. Haroun5, Hassan AbuAisha5, Abdelrahim E. Karrar1, Hamid S. Abdalla1 and Imadeldin E. Aradaib1* Abstract Background: Dengue fever, caused by dengue virus (DENV), has become one of the most important mosquito- borne viral diseases with a steady rise in global incidence, including the Sudan. Sporadic cases and frequent acute febrile illness outbreaks, compatible with Dengue fever, have been reported in El-Gadarif State, Sudan. However, diagnosis was based almost exclusively on clinical signs without confirmatory laboratory investigations. Despite the magnitude of the problem in El-Gadarif State, no information is currently available with regard to the epidemiology of the disease in this State. El-Gadarif State is one of the largest commercial centers in the Sudan. The objective of the present investigation is to estimate the prevalence of DENV antibodies, and determine the potential risk factors associated with seropositivity among residents of El-Gadarif State. Methods: A cross sectional study was conducted in a total of 701residents randomly selected from all 10 localities in El-Gadarif State. The sera from the 701 residents were tested for the presence of DENV-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies using a commercially available Anti-dengue IgG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
    [Show full text]
  • A SEASON of MIGRATION in the EAST Foreward Our Party in Sudan
    A SEASON OF MIGRATION IN THE EAST Tt2ETPA<C.ET Foreward Our party in Sudan consisted of five persons: four from INTERTECT and my companion, Rita. When we sit down to talk about our experiences, it’s striking how differently each of us saw things. As for me, most of my time I worked directly with the Sudanese government in a small village in ^Y Jastern Sudan called Shouak. Arabic was the common tongue, and most of my friends and fellow workers were Sudanese. After five and a half months in the country, my talk was sprinkled with Arabic phrases and I had come to know and love village life in the eastern desert. Kent Hardin, one of my associates, was also based in Shouak but in the initial days spent most of his time working to the north in Kassala with the Sudanese refugee authorities and the refugees from the Ethiopian province of Eritrea. He too learned the Arabic ways of the Sudanese, but as the member of our group most closely associated with the Eritreans, his vocabulary was often sprinkled with the words (and mannerisms) of the Eritreans. More than any of us he came to love the bitter, tangy coffee made by the refugees and celebrated as a form of intercourse between associates and a prerequisite to any down-to-earth work. o<oer Rita worked in Wad Kowli, a camp for Tigrayan refugees, approximatelyflO0)miles south of my base in Shouak. Her memories are essentially Tigrayan, the language, the customs of the refugees, their dress, their mannerisms, their food, and their longing to return to the mountains in time to grow a crop.
    [Show full text]
  • Sero-Prevalence of Anti-Brucella Antibodies in Goats in El- Gedarif State, Eastern Sudan
    ARC Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences Volume 4, Issue 1, 2018, PP 1-8 ISSN No. (Online) 2455-2518 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2455-2518.0401001 www.arcjournals.org Sero-Prevalence of Anti-Brucella Antibodies in Goats in El- Gedarif State, Eastern Sudan Khuzaima Babiker Adam1 , Hatim Hamad Ibrahaem2*, Yassir Adam Shuaib3, Saad El-Tiab Mohamed-Noor3, Ali Abdelgani Elgadal2, Mohamed Taha Shigidi4, Abdel Hafeez Hassan Nimir4 1 Ministry of Animal Resources, El-Gadarif, El-Gadarif state, the Sudan 2 Veterinary Research Institute, Soba, P.O. Box 8067, Khartoum, Sudan 3 College of Veterinary Medicine, Sudan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 204 (Hilat Kuku), Khartoum North, the Sudan 4Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Khartoum, P.O. Box 13314 (Shambat), Khartoum North, the Sudan *Corresponding Author: Hatim Hamad Ibrahaem, Veterinary Research Institute, Soba, P.O. Box 8067, Khartoum, Sudan. Email: [email protected] Abstract: This cross-sectional study was carried out between January and April 2014 with the aim of determining the seroprevalence of anti-brucella antibodies in goats in El-Gedarif state, the Sudan. A total number of 426 serum and 15 milk samples were collected from the study animals from eight different localities. These samples were examined using rose Bengal plate test (RBPT), serum agglutination test (SAT), competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA), and milk ring test. An overall seroprevalence of 10.8% (n=26, 95% CI between 7.85 and 13.75) was reported. Of the RBPT-positive samples, SAT confirmed the positivity of 13.0% (n=6). Furthermore, 6.5% (n=6) of the samples tested by cELISA showed positive results.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Sector-Led Economic Diversification and Development in Sudan
    SUDAN COUNTRY OFFICE PRIVATE SECTOR-LED ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN SUDAN African Development Bank Group East Africa Regional Development & Business Delivery Office 2016 PRIVATE SECTOR-LED ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN SUDAN THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP The production of this report has been coordinated by the African Development Bank (AfDB). Designations employed in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the institution concerning the legal status of any country, or the limitation of its frontier. While efforts have been made to present reliable information, the AfDB accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of its use. Ag. Vice President: Janvier Litse Regional Director (EARC): Gabriel Negatu Resident Representative (ETFO): Josephine Ngure Chief Regional Economist (EARC): Tilahun Temesgen Senior Macroeconomist (ETFO): Admit Zerihun PLEASE Copyright 2016 — AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP UPDATE Photo Credits: AfDB photo files THIS PAGE PUBLISHED BY African Development Bank Group - Eastern Africa Regional Resource Centre (EARC) Khushee Tower Longonot Road, Upper Hill Nairobi, Kenya Phone: (254) 20 2712925/26/28 Fax: (254) 20 2712938 Email: [email protected] Website: www.afdb.org TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD .........................................................................................................................................iii PREFACE ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Power, Land and Ethnicity in the Kassala-Gedaref States Catherine Miller
    Power, land and Ethnicity in the Kassala-Gedaref States Catherine Miller To cite this version: Catherine Miller. Power, land and Ethnicity in the Kassala-Gedaref States. Catherine Miller. Land, ethnicity and political legitimacy in Eastern Sudan.Le Caire„ CEDEJ, pp.3-58, 2005. halshs- 00150383 HAL Id: halshs-00150383 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00150383 Submitted on 30 May 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Power, Land and Ethnicity in the Kassala-Gedaref States: an Introduction Catherine Miller1 Published in 2005 in C. Miller (ed.) Land, ethnicity and political legitimacy in Eastern Sudan. Le Caire, Cedej, 3-58 The relevance of Regional studies Sudan like many other countries has been torn up in the last two decades by political and regional conflicts. The future of the country is often questioned particularly concerning the increasing trend toward regionalism and politicization of ethnicity. The Sudanese political and humanitarian situation has been widely analyzed in both national and international circles and the relevant literature (books, articles, reports, etc.) are quantitatively impressive. However, due to the difficulties of field work researches in Sudan, many recent political studies lack a deep understanding of the regional societies and are based on written accounts (newspapers, political decrees, NGOs and UN reports, political parties memo, etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Cuny Intertect 000002-07.Pdf
    CONSTRAINTS IN MOUNTING A PROMPT RELIEF EFFORT IN THE SUDAN REFUGEE CRISIS OF 1984-85 Frederick C . Cuny INTERTECT 1988 ABSTRACT Despite adequate warning, an existing operational structure, and the presence of experienced non-governmental relief agencies (NGOs), a major disaster occurred when refugees fleeing from northern Ethiopia entered Sudan in late 1984 and early 1985. A review of the history of the early stages of that operation indicates that the problems were primarily poli­ tical, managerial and organizational. This paper examines those problems, describes some of the changes that have taken place in the international relief system since that emergency, and suggests some further activities to reduce the number and scope of similar problems in the future. I. INTRODUCTION In early 1984, there were clear signs that a major famine was develop­ ing in northern Ethiopia in the provinces of Tigray and Eritrea. As early as 1983, relief organizations working in those areas had reported major shortfalls in food production, and the FAO made an appeal for emergency food aid at the end of 1983 and again in the spring of 1984. Despite the continuing civil war in northern Ethiopia, there was con­ siderable information from inside the rebel-held areas about the magnitude of the situation. Cross-border food supply operations had been in exis­ tence for a number of years, and numerous people from both NGOs and the press frequently went in and out. The rebel groups in both provinces had highly-effective civil relief organizations, supported by recognized and well-respected international NGOs. All these organizations reported that the combination of war and famine was placing considerable strain on food production systems and that people were unable to cope with mounting food shortages.
    [Show full text]
  • 75190 Africa 13/06/02 16:09 Side 179
    75190 Africa 13/06/02 16:09 Side 179 Sudan Main Objectives Promote the voluntary repatria- tion of Eritrean and other refugees; provide assistance, with particular attention to the needs of women, children and the elderly; if no other durable solutions are workable, seek resettlement of refugees who are eligible; close down UNHCR field offices in Port Sudan and Kassala in September 2001 in accordance with Action 2. Impact • UNHCR extended interna- tional protection to all refugees and other persons of concern in Sudan. • For more than 42,000 refugees a durable solution was found (9,321 pre-1991 Ethiopian refugees voluntarily repatria- ted, as did 32,650 Eritrean and 80 Ugandan refugees). • 116 Eritreans, 143 Ethiopians and six Tunisians were resettled to third countries for family reunification and protection reasons. Working Environment • UNHCR continued to provide assistance to all camp-based refugees, including healthcare and The Context primary education. • Three camps that hosted pre-1991 Ethiopian UNHCR extended protection and assistance to a total refugees were closed, rehabilitated and handed of 414,930 refugees in Sudan during 2001. Voluntary over to the local authorities. UNHCR relocated repatriation remained the most feasible durable 642 pre-1991 Ethiopian refugees to the Abu solution, though small numbers of refugees were Rakham camp. recommended for resettlement on a case by case basis. Local integration of refugees was not legally possible in Sudan. Diplomatic relations between Sudan and its neighbours improved, allowing an increase in the voluntary repatriation of Ethiopian, Eritrean and Ugandan refugees (42,142 altogether in 2001). UNHCR Global Report 2001 – 179 75190 Africa 13/06/02 16:09 Side 180 The Sudanese Government’s Commissioner for vision of education was also curtailed: only 15,000 Refugees (COR), was UNHCR’s principal imple- out of 55,000 school-aged children had access to the menting partner.
    [Show full text]