FONTS a Font Consists of Three Elements—Typeface, Type Size, and Typestyle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

FONTS A font consists of three elements—typeface, type size, and typestyle. A TYPEFACE is a set of characters with a common design and shape. It can be decorative or plain, monospaced or proportional. Word 2010 refers to typeface as font. A monospaced font allots the same amount of horizontal space for each character. A proportional font allots a varying amount of space for each character. Proportional fonts are divided into three categories: serif, sans serif, and decorative. 1. Serif fonts contain a small line at the end of a character stroke that helps move the reader’s eyes across the page. This font is more conventional and is a good choice for documents with large amounts of text. 2. Sans serif fonts lack the decorative flourishes of serif fonts. Sans serif fonts are often used in headings, headlines, and advertisements to contrast with the body text. The The Serif No Serif (Sans Serif) (Times New Roman font) (Calibri font) SERIF AND SANS SERIF TYPEFACES Serif Typefaces Sans Serif Typefaces Monospaced Typefaces Cambria Calibri Consolas Constantia Candara Courier Times New Roman Corbel Courier New Bookman Old Style Arial Letter Gothic 3. Decorative fonts have letters that are specially shaped and are neither serif nor sans serif. Some decorative fonts, such as Wingdings, have a picture rather than a letter that corresponds to characters as illustrated below: TYPE SIZE is generally set in proportional size. The size of proportional type is measured vertically in units called points. A vertical inch contains approximately 72 points. The higher the point size, the larger the characters. Within a typeface, various TYPESTYLES may be available. Typestyles are divided into four main categories: regular, bold, italic, and bold italic. NOTE . Calibri, point size 11, is Word 2010’s default font. You may want to change this default to some other font for reasons such as to change the mood of the document, enhance its visual appeal, or increase its readability. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department
Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department A GLOSSARY OF TERMS FOR FORMATTING COMPUTER-GENERATED BRIEFS, WITH EXAMPLES The rules concerning the formatting of briefs are contained in CPLR 5529 and in § 1250.8 of the Practice Rules of the Appellate Division. Those rules cover technical matters and therefore use certain technical terms which may be unfamiliar to attorneys and litigants. The following glossary is offered as an aid to the understanding of the rules. Typeface: A typeface is a complete set of characters of a particular and consistent design for the composition of text, and is also called a font. Typefaces often come in sets which usually include a bold and an italic version in addition to the basic design. Proportionally Spaced Typeface: Proportionally spaced type is designed so that the amount of horizontal space each letter occupies on a line of text is proportional to the design of each letter, the letter i, for example, being narrower than the letter w. More text of the same type size fits on a horizontal line of proportionally spaced type than a horizontal line of the same length of monospaced type. This sentence is set in Times New Roman, which is a proportionally spaced typeface. Monospaced Typeface: In a monospaced typeface, each letter occupies the same amount of space on a horizontal line of text. This sentence is set in Courier, which is a monospaced typeface. Point Size: A point is a unit of measurement used by printers equal to approximately 1/72 of an inch.
[Show full text]
Cloud Fonts in Microsoft Office
APRIL 2019 Guide to Cloud Fonts in Microsoft® Office 365® Cloud fonts are available to Office 365 subscribers on all platforms and devices. Documents that use cloud fonts will render correctly in Office 2019. Embed cloud fonts for use with older versions of Office. Reference article from Microsoft: Cloud fonts in Office DESIGN TO PRESENT Terberg Design, LLC Index MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS A B C D E Legend: Good choice for theme body fonts F G H I J Okay choice for theme body fonts Includes serif typefaces, K L M N O non-lining figures, and those missing italic and/or bold styles P R S T U Present with most older versions of Office, embedding not required V W Symbol fonts Language-specific fonts MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS Abadi NEW ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Abadi Extra Light ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Note: No italic or bold styles provided. Agency FB MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Agency FB Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Note: No italic style provided Algerian MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 01234567890 Note: Uppercase only. No other styles provided. Arial MICROSOFT OFFICE CLOUD FONTS ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Italic ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 01234567890 Arial Bold Italic ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
[Show full text]
15 the Effect of Font Type on Screen Readability by People with Dyslexia
The Effect of Font Type on Screen Readability by People with Dyslexia LUZ RELLO and RICARDO BAEZA-YATES, Web Research Group, DTIC, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain Around 10% of the people have dyslexia, a neurological disability that impairs a person’s ability to read and write. There is evidence that the presentation of the text has a significant effect on a text’s accessibility for people with dyslexia. However, to the best of our knowledge, there are no experiments that objectively 15 measure the impact of the typeface (font) on screen reading performance. In this article, we present the first experiment that uses eye-tracking to measure the effect of typeface on reading speed. Using a mixed between-within subject design, 97 subjects (48 with dyslexia) read 12 texts with 12 different fonts. Font types have an impact on readability for people with and without dyslexia. For the tested fonts, sans serif , monospaced, and roman font styles significantly improved the reading performance over serif , proportional, and italic fonts. On the basis of our results, we recommend a set of more accessible fonts for people with and without dyslexia. Categories and Subject Descriptors: H.5.2 [Information Interfaces and Presentation]: User Interfaces— Screen design, style guides; K.4.2 [Computers and Society]: Social Issues—Assistive technologies for per- sons with disabilities General Terms: Design, Experimentation, Human Factors Additional Key Words and Phrases: Dyslexia, learning disability, best practices, web accessibility, typeface, font, readability, legibility, eye-tracking ACM Reference Format: Luz Rello and Ricardo Baeza-Yates. 2016. The effect of font type on screen readability by people with Dyslexia.
[Show full text]
Publication Notes – 3Nt.Xyz
Publication Notes – 3nt.xyz Pete Matthews Jr – https://3nt.xyz – © June 19, 2021 Some of the material in this document originally appeared on the MIT/DL Bridge Club site, at http://web.mit.edu/mitdlbc/www/contrib.html. This article, at https://3nt.xyz/about/, is now the official home of this material. Look for updates here. Most of the MS Office documents about the game of bridge use the free Cards font. Starting in 2018, this font is also used in writing up deals with Bridge Composer. Many of the Portable Bridge Notation (PBN) files on this site were created or edited with BridgeComposer; some were created with Dealmaster Pro. The PDF files should be complete and need only Acrobat Reader. That is, all necessary font components are embedded in the files. Items are noted (I) when appropriate for Intermediate players, or (A) for Advanced or Advancing players. Titles of mainstream articles are bold, while more esoteric or less important titles are in italics. Media Codes To describe attributes of the intended media, PDF documents are noted with these Media Codes: Media Size Description Portrait orientation, 1-2 columns, US Letter, usually single column, best 8.5"W for printing and viewing on a moderate to large screen. Articles P x 11"H published before July 1, 2018 and most other bridge material is in this format. 11"W x Landscape orientation, 1-2 columns, US Letter. Only used fort the L 8.5"H occasional spreadsheet that is too wide for some other format. Portrait orientation, 1 column, US Junior (Half Letter).
[Show full text]
Powerpoint 2007
Office 2007 Microsoft Office Fluent User Interface ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Key Components ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Office Button .................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 The Ribbon .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Contextual Tabs ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Galleries .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Live Preview ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Mini Toolbar ..........................................................................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Presentation
Born Broken: Fonts And Information Loss In Legacy Documents Geoffrey Brown and Kam Woods Indiana University School of Informatics and Computing Key Questions How pervasive are font substitution problems ? What information is available to identify fonts ? How well can we match the fonts required by a document collection ? How can we assist archivists in identifying serious font issues ? Page 8 MCTM Bulletin February 2005 K: I knew what you meant. I was just kidding. I’ll do XüLLbl (W):InputQ:FnOff :"""Y =! Y",Y#:PlotsOff the dishes tonight at dinner. YüL‚(W):Goto:0!Xscl:0!Yscl:Plot1(Scatt T er,L#,L$,&) PlotsOn 1:ZoomStat:StorePic Pic1 Lbl Q:FnOff :""üY :PlotsOff Jennifer felt better so offered the following challenge to Pause :Goto T Kevin. Lbl:0üXscl:0üYscl:Plot1(Scatt S:ClrHome:2!dim(L%er,L):dim(L ,L‚,Ñ)# )!N J: What type of general statement can you make DispPlotsOn "NO. 1:ZoomStat:StorePic OF Pic1 regarding the various polygons and, better yet, what PausePTS.":Output(1,13,N):Pause :Goto T can you say about a figure that looks like this? LblFor(I,1,N):ClrHome S:ClrHome:2üdim(Lƒ):dim(L )üN Disp "NO. "PT. OF NO.","":Output(1,9,I) PTS.":Output(1,13,N):Pause L#(I)!L%(1):L$(I)!L%(2) For(I,1,N):ClrHome Disp L%:Pause :End:Goto T LblDisp "PT.0:Menu(" NO.","":Output(1,9,I) MODELS R""," LINEAR (2)",1,"L(I)üLƒ(1):L‚(I)üLƒ(2) QUADRATIC",2," CUBIC/QUARTIC",3,"Disp Lƒ:Pause :End:Goto LOGARITHMIC",4," T LblEXPONENTIAL",5," 0:Menu(" MODELS POWER",6," RÜ"," LINEAR MAIN (2)",1," MENU",T) QUADRATIC",2," CUBIC/QUARTIC",3," Lbl 1:"aX+b"!Y# Kevin was impressed.
[Show full text]
Lushootseed Unicode Keyboard Help
Lushootseed Unicode Keyboard 1.1 Overview Design This Keyman keyboard is designed for Lushootseed, a language of the Pacific Northwest spoken in Washington state. The arrangement of Lushootseed letters on this keyboard closely follow the arrangement of keys in a standard English QWERTY keyboard. On Screen Keyboard This keyboard includes an On Screen Keyboard view for easy reference. The On Screen Keyboard works best when associated with a QWERTY US layout. Fonts This is a Unicode keyboard and works with any Unicode font which has support for Lushootseed characters. Common fonts which work with Lushootseed are: Arial Consolas Arial Unicode MS Courier New Calibri Tahoma Cambria Times New Roman This keyboard also includes the following fonts which work well with Lushootseed: Lushootseed Sulad Gentium Plus Lushootseed School Keyboard Layout Lushootseed Unicode: Unshifted ` 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Backspace © 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 - = Tab q w e r t y u i o p [ ] \ q w ə š t y u i ʷ p [ ] \ Caps Lock a s d f g h j k l ; ' Enter a s d ʔ g h ǰ k l ɬ ' Shift z x c v b n m , . / Shift & x c č b n m , . / Ctrl Alt Alt Ctrl Lushootseed Unicode: Shifted ~ ! @ # $ % ^ & * ( ) _ + Backspace © ! @ # $ % ^ & * ( ) _ + Tab Q W E R T Y U I O P { } ¦ ; < ;ʷ = > kʷ ? { } ¦ Caps Lock A S D F G H J K L : " Enter qʷ dᶻ gʷ Aʷ A B C " Shift Z X C V B N M < > ? Shift &ʷ xʷ E F G H I < > ? Ctrl Alt Alt Ctrl Keyboard Details You can find most keys on the Lushootseed keyboard by thinking of a similar letter in English.
[Show full text]
Choosing Fonts – Quick Tips
Choosing Fonts – Quick Tips 1. Choose complementary fonts – choose a font that matches the mood of your design. For business cards, it is probably best to choose a classic font. *Note: These fonts are not available in Canva, but are in the Microsoft Office Suite. For some good Canva options, go to this link – https://www.canva.com/learn/canva-for-work-brand-fonts/ Examples: Serif Fonts: Sans Serif Fonts: Times New Roman Helvetica Cambria Arial Georgia Verdana Courier New Calibri Century Schoolbook 2. Establish a visual hierarchy – Use fonts to separate different types of information and guide the reader - Use different fonts, sizes, weights (boldness), and even color - Example: Heading (Helvetica, SZ 22, Bold) Sub-heading (Helvetica, SZ 16, Italics) Body Text (Garamond, SZ 12, Regular) Captions (Garamond, SZ 10, Regular 3. Mix Serifs and Sans Serifs – This is one of the best ways to add visual interest to type. See in the above example how I combined Helvetica, a sans serif font, with Garamond, a serif font. 4. Create Contrast, Not Conflict: Fonts that are too dissimilar may not pair well together. Contrast is good, but fonts need a connecting element. Conflict Contrast 5. Use Fonts from the Same Family: These fonts were created to work together. For example, the fonts in the Arial or Courier families. 6. Limit Your Number of Fonts: No more than 2 or 3 is a good rule – for business cards, choose 2. 7. Trust Your Eye: These are not concrete rules – you will know if a design element works or not! .
[Show full text]
Perceived Legibility of Onscreen English Fonts: an Exploration Into Readers and Font Types
Perceived Legibility of Onscreen English Fonts: An Exploration into Readers and Font Types Dr. Chatpong Tangmanee, Chulalongkorn Business School, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand Thanaphorn Rotworaphorn, Chulalongkorn Business School, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand ABSTRACT Onscreen English fonts have a critical role in communicating information. Although there has been research into the legibility of these fonts, no study has yet explored font legibility in the context of ethnicity across font types. The present study attempts to fill this void. 402 Thai and non-Thai participants completed questionnaires that displayed texts using serif, sans serif and script fonts. The analysis revealed that Thai and non-Thai readers’ perception of font legibility are similar. Comparing between the two ethnicities, the differences in perceived legibility of the serif and script fonts are statistically significant however the difference when compared to the sans serif was not significant. In addition, Thai readers perceived significantly different degrees of legibility among the three fonts. Yet, non-Thai readers perceived legibility of the serif and the sans serif fonts to be about the same but significantly different from the script font. In addition to extending theoretical insights into digital typography across two groups of viewers, practitioners could adopt the findings and use the onscreen English fonts that enhance viewers’ legibility Keywords: Perceived legibility; Onscreen English fonts; Thai and Non-Thai readers; Serif; Sans serif; Script INTRODUCTION An onscreen English font is a set of English characters on a computer monitor of a certain design. A font is conceptually different from a typeface. In traditional typography, a font refers to a complete character set of a single size and style of a given typeface.
[Show full text]
New Opentype Fonts on Folio 11
New OpenType Fonts on Folio 11 Postscript Name Preferred Name AdobeArabic-Bold.otf Adobe Arabic Bold AdobeArabic-BoldItalic.otf Adobe Arabic Bold Italic AdobeArabic-Italic.otf Adobe Arabic Italic AdobeArabic-Regular.otf Adobe Arabic Regular AdobeHebrew-Bold.otf Adobe Hebrew Bold AdobeHebrew-BoldItalic.otf Adobe Hebrew Bold Italic AdobeHebrew-Italic.otf Adobe Hebrew Italic AdobeHebrew-Regular.otf Adobe Hebrew Regular AdobeThai-Bold.otf Adobe Thai Bold AdobeThai-BoldItalic.otf Adobe Thai Bold Italic AdobeThai-Italic.otf Adobe Thai Italic AdobeThai-Regular.otf Adobe Thai Regular AmigoStd.otf Amigo Std Regular ArnoPro-Bold.otf Arno Pro Bold ArnoPro-BoldCaption.otf Arno Pro Bold Caption ArnoPro-BoldDisplay.otf Arno Pro Bold Display ArnoPro-BoldItalic.otf Arno Pro Bold Italic ArnoPro-BoldItalicCaption.otf Arno Pro Bold Italic Caption ArnoPro-BoldItalicDisplay.otf Arno Pro Bold Italic Display ArnoPro-BoldItalicSmText.otf Arno Pro Bold Italic SmText ArnoPro-BoldItalicSubhead.otf Arno Pro Bold Italic Subhead ArnoPro-BoldSmText.otf Arno Pro Bold SmText ArnoPro-BoldSubhead.otf Arno Pro Bold Subhead ArnoPro-Caption.otf Arno Pro Caption ArnoPro-Display.otf Arno Pro Display ArnoPro-Italic.otf Arno Pro Italic ArnoPro-ItalicCaption.otf Arno Pro Italic Caption ArnoPro-ItalicDisplay.otf Arno Pro Italic Display ArnoPro-ItalicSmText.otf Arno Pro Italic SmText ArnoPro-ItalicSubhead.otf Arno Pro Italic Subhead ArnoPro-LightDisplay.otf Arno Pro Light Display ArnoPro-LightItalicDisplay.otf Arno Pro Light Italic Display ArnoPro-Regular.otf Arno Pro Regular ArnoPro-Smbd.otf
[Show full text]
Vision Performance Institute
Vision Performance Institute Technical Report Individual character legibility James E. Sheedy, OD, PhD Yu-Chi Tai, PhD John Hayes, PhD The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that influence the legibility of individual characters. Previous work in our lab [2], including the first study in this sequence, has studied the relative legibility of fonts with different anti- aliasing techniques or other presentation medias, such as paper. These studies have tested the relative legibility of a set of characters configured with the tested conditions. However the relative legibility of individual characters within the character set has not been studied. While many factors seem to affect the legibility of a character (e.g., character typeface, character size, image contrast, character rendering, the type of presentation media, the amount of text presented, viewing distance, etc.), it is not clear what makes a character more legible when presenting in one way than in another. In addition, the importance of those different factors to the legibility of one character may not be held when the same set of factors was presented in another character. Some characters may be more legible in one typeface and others more legible in another typeface. What are the character features that affect legibility? For example, some characters have wider openings (e.g., the opening of “c” in Calibri is wider than the character “c” in Helvetica); some letter g’s have double bowls while some have single (e.g., “g” in Batang vs. “g” in Verdana); some have longer ascenders or descenders (e.g., “b” in Constantia vs.
[Show full text]
The New Font Project: TEX Gyre
Hans Hagen, Jerzy Ludwichowski, Volker Schaa NAJAAR 2006 47 The New Font Project: TEX Gyre Abstract metric and encoding files for each font. We look for- In this short presentation, we will introduce a new ward to an extended TFM format which will lift this re- project: the “lm-ization” of the free fonts that come striction and, in conjunction with OpenType, simplify with T X distributions. We will discuss the project E delivery and usage of fonts in TEX. objectives, timeline and cross-lug funding aspects. We especially look forward to assistance from pdfTEX users, because the pdfTEX team is working on the implementation on the support for OpenType Introduction fonts. An important consideration from Hans Hagen: “In The New Font Project is a brainchild of Hans Ha- the end, even Ghostscript will benefit, so I can even gen, triggered mainly by the very good reception imagine those fonts ending up in the Ghostscript dis- of the Latin Modern (LM) font project by the TEX tribution.” community. After consulting other LUG leaders, The idea of preparing such font families was sug- Bogusław Jackowski and Janusz M. Nowacki, aka gested by the pdfTEX development team. Their pro- “GUST type.foundry”, were asked to formulate the pro- posal triggered a lively discussion by an informal ject. group of representatives of several TEX user groups — The next section contains its outline, as prepared notably Karl Berry (TUG), Hans Hagen (NTG), Jerzy by Bogusław Jackowski and Janusz M. Nowacki. The Ludwichowski (GUST), Volker RW Schaa (DANTE)— remaining sections were written by us. who suggested that we should approach this project as a research, technical and implementation team, and Project outline promised their help in taking care of promotion, integ- ration, supervising and financing.
[Show full text]