DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix F Environmental Assessment Worksheet September 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix F Environmental Assessment Worksheet September 2019 BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Appendix F Environmental Assessment Worksheet September 2019 Environmental Assessment Worksheet: Appendix F CONTENTS METRO Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Project CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................. F-v F. Environmental Assessment Worksheet ........................................................................ F-1 F.1. Project Title ...................................................................................................................... F-1 F.2. Proposer .......................................................................................................................... F-1 F.3. RGU .................................................................................................................................. F-1 F.4. Reason for EAW Preparation .......................................................................................... F-2 F.5. Project Location .............................................................................................................. F-2 F.6. Project Description .......................................................................................................... F-4 F.7. Cover Types ................................................................................................................... F-16 F.8. Permits and Approvals Required ................................................................................. F-17 F.9. Land Use ........................................................................................................................ F-18 F.10. Geology, Soils and Topography/Land Forms .............................................................. F-26 F.11. Water Resources ........................................................................................................... F-28 F.12. Contamination/Hazardous Materials/Wastes ............................................................... F-46 F.13. Fish, Wildlife, Plant Communities, and Sensitive Ecological Resources (Rare Features) .............................................................................................................. F-52 F.14. Historic Properties ........................................................................................................ F-65 F.15. Visual Resources........................................................................................................... F-74 F.16. Air ................................................................................................................................... F-76 F.17. Noise .............................................................................................................................. F-79 F.18. Transportation ............................................................................................................... F-85 F.19. Cumulative Potential Effects ........................................................................................ F-97 F.20. Other Potential Environmental Effects ...................................................................... F-110 SEPTEMBER 2019 F-i Environmental Assessment Worksheet: Appendix F CONTENTS METRO Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Project TABLES Table F.5-1: Public Land Survey Locations ............................................................................................................ F-2 Table F.6-1: Build Alternatives’ Changes to Roadway and Pedestrian Infrastructure ......................................... F-12 Table F.6-2: Project Dimensions .......................................................................................................................... F-15 Table F.7-1: Project Coverage Types ................................................................................................................... F-16 Table F.8-1: Permits and Approvals Required Status .......................................................................................... F-18 Table F.11-1: Summary of Delineated Wetlands ................................................................................................. F-31 Table F.11-2: Impaired Waters Within 1 Mile of Project Potential Limits of Disturbance ..................................... F-32 Table F.11-3: Wells Within 1 Block of Project Potential Limits of Disturbance .................................................... F-33 Table F.11-4: Build Alternatives Changes to Impervious Area ............................................................................ F-38 Table F.11-5: Summary of Build Alternatives’ Changes to Impervious Area ....................................................... F-38 Table F.11-6: Build Alternatives Water Quality Requirements ............................................................................. F-39 Table F.11-7: Alignment C Wetland Impacts ........................................................................................................ F-41 Table F.11-8: Alignment D3 Wetland Impacts ...................................................................................................... F-42 Table F.11-9: Required Wetland Replacement by Alternative ............................................................................. F-43 Table F.12-1: Number of High-, Medium- and Low-Risk Sites within the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Study Area and Limits of Disturbance .............................................................. F-49 Table F.12-2: Sites Identified As Containing Regulated Material, Regulated Reuse Material, or Unregulated Material Based on the Phase II ESA ........................................................................................... F-49 Table F.13-1: Federally Listed Species in Ramsey and Washington Counties ................................................... F-53 Table F.13-2: State-Listed Species in the Resource Study Area per NHIS Database (November 2018) ........... F-56 Table F.13-3: Potentially Impacted Species and Habitat by Alignment and Alternative ...................................... F-63 Table F.13-4: Long-Term Impacts to Wildlife Habitat by Alternative .................................................................... F-64 Table F.14-1: Historic Properties Identified to Date In The Project Area of Potential Effect ................................ F-67 Table F.15-1: Long-Term Visual and Aesthetic Impacts ...................................................................................... F-76 Table F.17-1: Summary of Existing Noise Measurements ................................................................................... F-81 Table F.17-2: Summary of Existing L10 and L50 Noise Levels ........................................................................... F-82 Table F.17-3: Noise Impact Assessment Summary ............................................................................................. F-84 Table F.18-1: Build Alternatives Long-Term Parking Impacts by Alignment ........................................................ F-86 Table F.18-2: Project Park-and-Ride Sites ........................................................................................................... F-87 Table F.18-3: Alignment A1 Existing AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ....................................... F-88 Table F.18-4: Alignment B Existing AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ......................................... F-89 Table F.18-5: Alignment C Existing AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ......................................... F-90 Table F.18-6: Alignment D3 Existing AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ....................................... F-91 Table F.18-7: Alignment A2 Existing AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ....................................... F-91 SEPTEMBER 2019 F-ii Environmental Assessment Worksheet: Appendix F CONTENTS METRO Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Project Table F.18-8: Alignment A1 2040 AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ............................................ F-92 Table F.18-9: Alignment B 2040 AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations .............................................. F-92 Table F.18-10: Alignment C 2040 AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ............................................ F-93 Table F.18-11: Dedicated Guideway Option at Hadley Avenue and 4th Street 2040 AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations ......................................................................................... F-94 Table F.18-12: Alignment D3 2040 AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations .......................................... F-95 Table F.18-13: Alignment A2 2040 AM and PM Peak-Hour Intersection Operations .......................................... F-96 Table F.19-1: Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions in the Corridor ............................................................. F-100 Table F.20-1: Acquisitions by Build Alternative .................................................................................................. F-111 ATTACHMENTS Attachment F-1: Environmental Assessment Worksheet Figures Figure F1-1: County General Location Map .................................................................................................................... ATT F1-1 Figure F1-2: U.S. Geological Survey Project Boundaries Map – Saint Paul ................................................................... ATT F1-2 Figure F1-3: U.S. Geological
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form
    FHR-a-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections_______________ 1. Name historic Krank Building and/or common Iris Park Place 2. Location street & number 1855 W. University N/A not for publication city, town St. Paul N/A vicinity of congressional district 4th 123 state Minnesota code 232 county Ramsey code 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public x occupied agriculture museum X building(s) X private unoccupied X commercial park structure both X work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible __ entertainment religious object N/A in process X yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner off Property name Palen-Kimball Company street & number 2505 W. University Avenue city,town St. Paul N/A vicinity of state Minnesota 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. Ramsey County Courthouse street & number 15 W. Kellogg Boulevard city, town St. Paul state Minnesota 55102 6. Representation in Existing Surveys Historic Sites Survey of title St. Paul and Ramsey County has this property been determined elegible? yes y no X date 12/80-11/82 federal state county X local Ramsey County Historical Society depository for survey records 75 W. Fifth Street, Room 323 city, town St. Paul state Minnesota 55102 7. Description Condition Check one Check one * excellent , deteriorated unaltered X original site X -.good « *<* **" • ruins X altered moved date fair unexposed Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance The A.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Planning Into the Broader Public Policy, Land Use • H - Housing Plan; Planning and Decision-Making Processes of the City
    HISTORIC PRESERVATION The numbered strategies, policies, figures, and pages in the citywide Table of Contents plans of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan all employ the following Introduction.........................................................................................................................HP-1 abbreviations as a prefix to distinguish among these elements of the other citywide plans: Strategy 1: Be a Leader for Historic Preservation in Saint Paul.......................................................HP-8 • IN - introduction; Strategy 2: • LU - Land Use Plan; Integrate Historic Preservation Planning into the Broader Public Policy, Land Use • H - Housing Plan; Planning and Decision-Making Processes of the City................................................HP-11 • HP - Historic Preservation Plan; Strategy 3: • PR - Parks and Recreation Plan; Identify, Evaluate and Designate Historic Resources.................................................HP-13 • T - Transportation Plan; Strategy 4: • W - Water Resources Management Preserve and Protect Historic Resources.......................................................................HP-17 Plan; and • IM - Implementation. Strategy 5: Use Historic Preservation to Further Economic Development and Sustainability...HP-20 Strategy 6: Preserve Areas with Unique Architectural, Urban and Spatial Characteristics that Enhance the Character of the Built Environment.......................................................HP-24 Strategy 7: Provide Opportunities for Education and Outreach..................................................HP-26
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ——— Page ___ SUPPLEMENTARY LISTING RECORD NRIS Reference Number: 09000408 Date Listed: 6-10-09 Property Name: Minnesota Building County: Ramsey State: Minnesota This property is listed in the National Register of Historic Places in accordance with the attached nomination documentation subject to the following exceptions, exclusions, or amendments, notwithstanding the National Park Service certification included in the nomination documentation. Signature of the Keeper Date of Action Amended Items in Nomination The following correction is made to the submitted nomination: The thirteenth story of the building, built in 1930 as soon as the original building was completed, is considered a contributing component of the building and its date of construction is considered part of the period of significance (with 1929) and a significant date. According to Susan Roth, MN SHPO, "Construction on the 13th floor was begun on the heels of the completion of the building. It is sheathed with the same limestone and repeats the window pattern. There are no plans of the top floor. However, the building's architect moved in after it was completed, and the author of the nomination thinks it is a safe assumption that Hausler oversaw the construction of the 13th floor" (e-mail from Susan Roth to Barbara Wyatt, 6-8-09). Ms. Roth also noted that the windows were replaced in 1974. Notification and Distribution The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office was notified of this amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • METRO Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Project Section 106 Assessment of Effects and Final Determination of Effects for Historic Prop
    Bus Rapid Transit Project Section 106 Assessment of Effects and Final Determination of Effect for Historic Properties November 2020 Prepared by: Minnesota Department of Transportation Cultural Resources Unit 395 John Ireland Boulevard Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 http://www.dot.state.mn.us/culturalresources/index.html http://www.dot.state.mn.us/culturalresources/contacts.html On behalf of: United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Region V 200 West Adams Street, Suite 320 Chicago, Illinois 60606 To request this document in an alternative format: Please call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to [email protected]. Summary The METRO Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project (Project) is a proposed ten-mile-long BRT line located in Ramsey and Washington counties, Minnesota. Operating in both mixed traffic and on a dedicated guideway, the proposed alignment will generally parallel Interstate (I-) 94 from downtown Saint Paul to just east of I-694, where it will turn south and extend along Helmo and Bielenberg Avenues to the Woodbury Village Shopping Center, connecting downtown Saint Paul with the suburban cities of Maplewood, Landfall, Oakdale and Woodbury. The proposed line includes 21 stations, four (4) of which will include a park-and-ride facility. The Metropolitan Council (MC) intends to apply to the Federal Transit Authority (FTA) to fund the Project, request an Interstate right-of-way use agreement for a portion of the Project’s preferred alternative from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), acting through the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), and seek permits for construction from the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE).
    [Show full text]
  • Phase Ii Architectural History Investigation for the Proposed Central Transit Corridor, Hennepin and Ramsey Counties, Minnesota
    PHASE II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED CENTRAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR, HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA Submitted to: Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. September 2004 PHASE II ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY INVESTIGATION FOR THE PROPOSED CENTRAL TRANSIT CORRIDOR, HENNEPIN AND RAMSEY COUNTIES, MINNESOTA SHPO File No. 96-0059PA The 106 Group Project No. 02-34 Submitted to: Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority 665 Ramsey County Government Center West 50 West Kellogg Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55102 Submitted by: The 106 Group Ltd. The Dacotah Building 370 Selby Avenue St. Paul, MN 55102 Project Manager: Anne Ketz, M.A., RPA Principal Investigator Betsy H. Bradley, Ph.D. Report Authors Betsy H. Bradley, Ph.D. Jennifer L. Bring, B.A. Andrea Vermeer, M.A., RPA September 2004 Central Transit Corridor Phase II Architectural History Investigation Page i MANAGEMENT SUMMARY From May to August of 2004, The 106 Group Ltd. (The 106 Group) conducted a Phase II architectural history investigation for the Central Transit Corridor (Central Corridor) project in Minneapolis, Hennepin County, and St. Paul, Ramsey County, Minnesota. The proposed project is a multi-agency undertaking being led by the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority (RCRRA). The Phase II investigation was conducted under contract with the RCRRA. The proposed action is a Light Rail Transit (LRT) or Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) facility for the Central Corridor, a transportation corridor that extends approximately 11 miles between downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul, Minnesota. The project will be receiving federal permitting and funding, along with state funding, and, therefore, must comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, and with applicable state laws.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet »™B»Ilding „
    NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service APR'0!997 National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NAT. REaSirRGF ! This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NFS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Hamm Building other names/site number N/A 2. Location street & number 408 St. Peter Street D not for publication N/A city or town _ St. Paul _ D vicinity N/A state Minnesota code MN county Ramsey code 123 zip code 55102 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated a jthority under the National Hi storic Preservation Act, as amended, 1 hereby certify that this IS nomination D request for deter mination of eligibility meets th e documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of .Historic Places and neetsjlie-prdcedural and pro essional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ^K[ me© sJZI does-i cfT?ri§ieftrie/Rlatiorial Registe criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhoods at the Edge of the Walking City
    Saint Paul Historic Context Study Neighborhoods at the Edge of the Walking City Saint Paul, Minnesota, 1867 (Chicago: Chicago Lithographing Co., 1867). Ruger Map Collection, Library of Congress. Prepared for Historic Saint Paul, City of Saint Paul Heritage Preservation Commission, and Ramsey County Historical Society Saint Paul, Minnesota By Mead & Hunt, Inc. 2011 Saint Paul Historic Context Study Neighborhoods at the Edge of the Walking City Introduction This historic context examines Saint Paul’s neighborhoods located at the edge of the “walking city,” or the area in which residents could easily travel on foot to reach their destinations before mass transportation was readily available. In the mid-nineteenth century, the early years of Saint Paul’s development, the city’s residents settled around the Mississippi River steamboat landings known as the Upper and Lower Landings. While many of the houses were interspersed among the commercial and public buildings at each of the landings, several notable residential districts, including Irvine Park, Lafayette Park, and Dayton’s Bluff, developed near the original settlements early in Saint Paul’s history.1 As the city grew in the post-Civil War years beyond the original settlements, the limits of the walking city expanded and it became a city of several separate, distinct, and larger neighborhoods.2 These neighborhoods included, as typically identified today, Summit-University, Thomas-Dale, North End, Payne-Phalen, West 7th Street, and West Side. Figure 1. The central area of Saint Paul with neighborhoods identified in their general locations in order to provide a relative sense of their locations in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation
    HISTORIC PRESERVATION The numbered strategies, policies, figures, and pages in the citywide Table of Contents plans of the Saint Paul Comprehensive Plan all employ the following Introduction.........................................................................................................................HP-1 abbreviations as a prefix to distinguish among these elements of the other citywide plans: Strategy 1: Be a Leader for Historic Preservation in Saint Paul.......................................................HP-8 t IN - introduction; Strategy 2: t LU - Land Use Plan; Integrate Historic Preservation Planning into the Broader Public Policy, Land Use t H - Housing Plan; Planning and Decision-Making Processes of the City................................................HP-11 t HP - Historic Preservation Plan; Strategy 3: t PR - Parks and Recreation Plan; Identify, Evaluate and Designate Historic Resources.................................................HP-13 t T - Transportation Plan; Strategy 4: t W - Water Resources Management Preserve and Protect Historic Resources.......................................................................HP-17 Plan; and Strategy 5: t IM - Implementation. Use Historic Preservation to Further Economic Development and Sustainability...HP-20 Strategy 6: Preserve Areas with Unique Architectural, Urban and Spatial Characteristics that Enhance the Character of the Built Environment.......................................................HP-24 Strategy 7: Provide Opportunities for Education and Outreach..................................................HP-26
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel R. Pratt CV 2020
    3 ARCH , LLC ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY • ARCHITECTURAL PHOTOGRAPHY • ARCHAEOLOGY 1412 PASCAL ST N SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55108-2437 TEL 651.308.8749 [email protected] WWW.ARCH3LLC.COM Daniel R. Pratt, M.A. Complete Project List Mr. Pratt has over 35 years experience performing phased architectural and archaeological investigations for compliance with federal and state preservation laws. He has worked closely with the Section 106 process, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, and has extensive experience identifying and evaluating sites, buildings, and structures for National Register eligibility. He meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards (48 CFR 44716) for performing the identification, evaluation, and registration of archaeological and architectural properties and is a member of the Register of Professional Archaeologists (RPA). Mr. Pratt has also conducted over 75 documentations for the National Park Service’s Historic American Building Survey/Historic American Engineering Record/Historic American Landscapes Survey (HABS/HAER/HALS), the Minnesota State Historical Society’s Minnesota Historic Property Record (MHPR), and produced photographic documentation for the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). He recently authored the photographic standards and guidelines for the MHPR program. Mr. Pratt is a professional photographer, offering black/white and color commercial and documentary services in 35mm, medium-format (120mm), large-format
    [Show full text]