DOCSLIB.ORG

Benoit Mandelbrot Papers M1857

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8sf2zgr No online items Guide to the Benoit Mandelbrot Papers M1857 Finding aid prepared by Joseph Geller Department of Special Collections and University Archives Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford, California, 94305-6064 Email: [email protected] 2014 Guide to the Benoit Mandelbrot M1857 1 Papers M1857 Title: Benoit Mandelbrot papers Identifier/Call Number: M1857 Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 413.0 Linear feet(396 manuscript boxes; 3 half boxes; 79 cartons; 48 flat boxes; 1 card box; 10 map folders; 1 map tube) Date (inclusive): circa 1932-2010 Language of Materials note: Materials in the collection are mainly in English and French. Abstract: The papers document the life and work of Benoit B. Mandelbrot, mathematician and pioneer of fractal geometry. The collection contains correspondence, research data, drafts and publications, administrative records, teaching material, photographs, artwork, audiovisual material, and computer media relating to Mandelbrot's education, professional career, and work in several organizations, principally at IBM's Thomas J. Watson Research Center and Yale University. Physical Location: Special Collections and University Archives materials are stored offsite and must be paged 36-48 hours in advance. For more information on paging collections, see the department's website: http://library.stanford.edu/spc. creator: Mandelbrot, Benoit B. Biographical Note Benoit B. Mandelbrot was born in 1924 to a Lithuanian Jewish family in Warsaw, Poland. In 1936, the family fled the Nazis, moving first to Paris and then to southern France. After the war, Mandelbrot continued his studies at the École Polytechnique in Paris and then in the United States at the California Institute of Technology. He returned to France and completed a Ph.D. in Mathematics at the University of Paris in 1952. Mandelbrot spent most of his professional research career at IBM's Thomas J. Watson Research Center, beginning in 1958; with his appointment as an IBM Fellow in 1974, he was free to follow his personal inclination towards interdisciplinary research founded on applied mathematics. Mandelbrot had begun to focus his attention on fractal mathematics during the 1960s, beginning with his article, "How Long is the Coast of Britain? Statistical Self-Similarity and Fractional Dimension," published in Science (1967). In this article he introduced fractals as part of the solution to a problem that had occupied his attention for some time: How to measure a curve as complex as a geographic coastline? He discussed two salient characteristics of fractals that applied to this problem: self-similarity and "fractional" dimensionality. Self-similarity referred to the persistence of patterns as an observer zoomed in or out of the visualization of a fractal set. Fractional geometry described the quality these sets had mathematically of being "fuzzier" than a line but never completely filling a plane. A few years later, in 1975, Mandelbrot introduced the term "fractal" to describe such mathematical sets. Over the course of his career, until his death in 2010, Mandelbrot encouraged the application of fractal geometry to fields ranging from engineering and medicine to finance, climate study, and art. Mandelbrot first rendered a computer-generated image of the set that would be named after him at IBM's Thomas J. Watson Research Center in 1980. The computer plot produced by a software program revealed the distinctive image of a large vaguely heart-shaped object connected to a smaller spherical object and having a rough, fuzzy border. While this was neither the first mathematical study of this particular mathematical set nor the first visualization of it, Mandelbrot had developed an algorithm that would be the basis of subsequent computer programs used to study and visualize fractals. Mandelbrot’s work was introduced to a wider readership with the publication of an article about the Mandelbrot Set in Scientific American (1985). Like many other results from applied and recreational mathematics, it appeared in A.K. Dewdney’s "Computer Recreations" column. Dewdney opened by describing Mandelbrot’s visualization of the set, announcing to his readers that "here is an infinite regress of detail that astonishes us with its variety, its complexity and its strange beauty." He described Mandelbrot’s work in fractal geometry and how the boundary of the Mandelbrot Set was a fractal exhibiting fractional dimensionality and the recursive quality of self-similarity. The article went on to describe how a computer program could function essentially as a microscope for this geometrical object, allowing the observer to examine its properties in exquisite detail, "like a tourist in a land of infinite beauty."[A. K. Dewdney, "Computer Recreations: A Computer Microscope Zooms in for a Look at the Most Complex Object in Mathematics," Scientific American, 253, Aug. 1985: 16-24.] Mandelbrot wrote and edited a number of significant books describing his research into fractal geometry, including Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension (1977) and The Fractal Geometry of Nature (1983). He was also the author of numerous articles and conference papers and received many awards and honorary degrees for his work. After leaving IBM in 1987, he became a professor of Mathematics at Yale University, a position he held until his retirement in 2005. His memoir, The Fractalist: Memoir of a Scientific Maverick, was published in 2012. Guide to the Benoit Mandelbrot M1857 2 Papers M1857 Acquisition Information This collection was given by Aliette Mandelbrot to Stanford University, Special Collections in 2011, 2012, and 2013. General note The initials BBM are sometimes used in the guide for Benoit B. Mandelbrot. Publication Rights All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94305-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns. See: http://library.stanford.edu/spc/using-collections/permission-publish. Restrictions also apply to digital representations of the original materials. Use of digital files is restricted to research and educational purposes. Scope and Contents The papers document the life and work of Benoit B. Mandelbrot, mathematician and pioneer of fractal geometry. The collection contains biographical material, personal and professional correspondence, drafts and typescripts for books and articles, subject files, and reprints. The collection also contains a significant amount of research data, including notes, plots, graphs, and computer-generated visualizations of fractals. Also included are teaching materials, administrative records, awards, and materials related to publicity events, such as posters and flyers announcing conferences and talks focusing on fractals or related topics. Other formats present in the collection include photographs and audiovisual and born-digital material. There is also an extensive amount of fractal and fractal-related artwork and artifacts. Access to Collection The collection is open for research except materials in Series 28: Restricted Material (boxes 327, 328, 329, 330, 495, 496). Restricted materials are closed until January 1, 2045. The majority of audiovisual material in the collection has been digitally reformatted and is available to view in the Special Collections Reading Room. Born-digital materials are still being processed and not yet open for research. Preferred Citation [identification of item], Benoit Mandelbrot papers (M1857). Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Arrangement The collection has been arranged into 28 series: Series 1. Personal/Biographical Series 2. Course Work Series 3. Personal Correspondence Series 4. "Mail Files" Series 5. Professional Correspondence Series 6. Loose Correspondence Series 7. Books Series 8. Research Articles and Other Writings Series 9. Working files/Research Series 10. Professional Activities Series 11. Data/Plots/Visualizations Series 12. Plots/Graphs – rolls Series 13. Interviews and Transcripts Series 14. Teaching Material Series 15. Certificates, Awards, and Diplomas Series 16. Grant/Contract Administration Series 17. Administrative Files Series 18. Reprints and Subject Files Series 19. Reprints by Mandelbrot Guide to the Benoit Mandelbrot M1857 3 Papers M1857 Series 20. Clippings Series 21. Works by Others Series 22. Publicity Material Series 23. Artwork and Artifacts Series 24. Photographic Material Series 25. Music Series 26. Audiovisual Material Series 27. Computer Media/Born-digital Material Series 28. Restricted Material Processing Note The collection was processed by Joseph Geller and Laura Wilsey; with Christy Smith and Ivan Josh Henriquez Nunez. Subjects and Indexing Terms Mandelbrot, Benoit B. Computer graphics. Fractals in art Fractals. Julia sets Mandelbrot sets Mathematics--History--20th century. Thomas J. Watson IBM Research Center Series 1. Personal/Biographical 1930s-2013 Scope and Contents This series consists of the personal papers of Mandelbrot and his family, including civil status,
Recommended publications
  • Using Fractal Dimension for Target Detection in Clutter

    Using Fractal Dimension for Target Detection in Clutter

    KIM T. CONSTANTIKES USING FRACTAL DIMENSION FOR TARGET DETECTION IN CLUTTER The detection of targets in natural backgrounds requires that we be able to compute some characteristic of target that is distinct from background clutter. We assume that natural objects are fractals and that the irregularity or roughness of the natural objects can be characterized with fractal dimension estimates. Since man-made objects such as aircraft or ships are comparatively regular and smooth in shape, fractal dimension estimates may be used to distinguish natural from man-made objects. INTRODUCTION Image processing associated with weapons systems is fractal. Falconer1 defines fractals as objects with some or often concerned with methods to distinguish natural ob­ all of the following properties: fine structure (i.e., detail jects from man-made objects. Infrared seekers in clut­ on arbitrarily small scales) too irregular to be described tered environments need to distinguish the clutter of with Euclidean geometry; self-similar structure, with clouds or solar sea glint from the signature of the intend­ fractal dimension greater than its topological dimension; ed target of the weapon. The discrimination of target and recursively defined. This definition extends fractal from clutter falls into a category of methods generally into a more physical and intuitive domain than the orig­ called segmentation, which derives localized parameters inal Mandelbrot definition whereby a fractal was a set (e.g.,texture) from the observed image intensity in order whose "Hausdorff-Besicovitch dimension strictly exceeds to discriminate objects from background. Essentially, one its topological dimension.,,2 The fine, irregular, and self­ wants these parameters to be insensitive, or invariant, to similar structure of fractals can be experienced firsthand the kinds of variation that the objects and background by looking at the Mandelbrot set at several locations and might naturally undergo because of changes in how they magnifications.
  • Complexity” Makes a Difference: Lessons from Critical Systems Thinking and the Covid-19 Pandemic in the UK

    Complexity” Makes a Difference: Lessons from Critical Systems Thinking and the Covid-19 Pandemic in the UK

    systems Article How We Understand “Complexity” Makes a Difference: Lessons from Critical Systems Thinking and the Covid-19 Pandemic in the UK Michael C. Jackson Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7TS, UK; [email protected]; Tel.: +44-7527-196400 Received: 11 November 2020; Accepted: 4 December 2020; Published: 7 December 2020 Abstract: Many authors have sought to summarize what they regard as the key features of “complexity”. Some concentrate on the complexity they see as existing in the world—on “ontological complexity”. Others highlight “cognitive complexity”—the complexity they see arising from the different interpretations of the world held by observers. Others recognize the added difficulties flowing from the interactions between “ontological” and “cognitive” complexity. Using the example of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK, and the responses to it, the purpose of this paper is to show that the way we understand complexity makes a huge difference to how we respond to crises of this type. Inadequate conceptualizations of complexity lead to poor responses that can make matters worse. Different understandings of complexity are discussed and related to strategies proposed for combatting the pandemic. It is argued that a “critical systems thinking” approach to complexity provides the most appropriate understanding of the phenomenon and, at the same time, suggests which systems methodologies are best employed by decision makers in preparing for, and responding to, such crises. Keywords: complexity; Covid-19; critical systems thinking; systems methodologies 1. Introduction No one doubts that we are, in today’s world, entangled in complexity. At the global level, economic, social, technological, health and ecological factors have become interconnected in unprecedented ways, and the consequences are immense.
  • Pictures of Julia and Mandelbrot Sets

    Pictures of Julia and Mandelbrot Sets

    Pictures of Julia and Mandelbrot Sets Wikibooks.org January 12, 2014 On the 28th of April 2012 the contents of the English as well as German Wikibooks and Wikipedia projects were licensed under Cre- ative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license. An URI to this license is given in the list of figures on page 143. If this document is a derived work from the contents of one of these projects and the content was still licensed by the project under this license at the time of derivation this document has to be licensed under the same, a similar or a compatible license, as stated in section 4b of the license. The list of contributors is included in chapter Contributors on page 141. The licenses GPL, LGPL and GFDL are included in chapter Licenses on page 151, since this book and/or parts of it may or may not be licensed under one or more of these licenses, and thus require inclusion of these licenses. The licenses of the figures are given in the list of figures on page 143. This PDF was generated by the LATEX typesetting software. The LATEX source code is included as an attachment (source.7z.txt) in this PDF file. To extract the source from the PDF file, we recommend the use of http://www.pdflabs.com/tools/pdftk-the-pdf-toolkit/ utility or clicking the paper clip attachment symbol on the lower left of your PDF Viewer, selecting Save Attachment. After ex- tracting it from the PDF file you have to rename it to source.7z.
  • Fractal Expressionism—Where Art Meets Science

    Fractal Expressionism—Where Art Meets Science

    Santa Fe Institute. February 14, 2002 9:04 a.m. Taylor page 1 Fractal Expressionism—Where Art Meets Science Richard Taylor 1 INTRODUCTION If the Jackson Pollock story (1912–1956) hadn’t happened, Hollywood would have invented it any way! In a drunken, suicidal state on a stormy night in March 1952, the notorious Abstract Expressionist painter laid down the foundations of his masterpiece Blue Poles: Number 11, 1952 by rolling a large canvas across the oor of his windswept barn and dripping household paint from an old can with a wooden stick. The event represented the climax of a remarkable decade for Pollock, during which he generated a vast body of distinct art work commonly referred to as the “drip and splash” technique. In contrast to the broken lines painted by conventional brush contact with the canvas surface, Pollock poured a constant stream of paint onto his horizontal canvases to produce uniquely contin- uous trajectories. These deceptively simple acts fuelled unprecedented controversy and polarized public opinion around the world. Was this primitive painting style driven by raw genius or was he simply a drunk who mocked artistic traditions? Twenty years later, the Australian government rekindled the controversy by pur- chasing the painting for a spectacular two million (U.S.) dollars. In the history of Western art, only works by Rembrandt, Velazquez, and da Vinci had com- manded more “respect” in the art market. Today, Pollock’s brash and energetic works continue to grab attention, as witnessed by the success of the recent retro- spectives during 1998–1999 (at New York’s Museum of Modern Art and London’s Tate Gallery) where prices of forty million dollars were discussed for Blue Poles: Number 11, 1952.
  • 4.3 Discovering Fractal Geometry in CAAD

    4.3 Discovering Fractal Geometry in CAAD

    4.3 Discovering Fractal Geometry in CAAD Francisco Garcia, Angel Fernandez*, Javier Barrallo* Facultad de Informatica. Universidad de Deusto Bilbao. SPAIN E.T.S. de Arquitectura. Universidad del Pais Vasco. San Sebastian. SPAIN * Fractal geometry provides a powerful tool to explore the world of non-integer dimensions. Very short programs, easily comprehensible, can generate an extensive range of shapes and colors that can help us to understand the world we are living. This shapes are specially interesting in the simulation of plants, mountains, clouds and any kind of landscape, from deserts to rain-forests. The environment design, aleatory or conditioned, is one of the most important contributions of fractal geometry to CAAD. On a small scale, the design of fractal textures makes possible the simulation, in a very concise way, of wood, vegetation, water, minerals and a long list of materials very useful in photorealistic modeling. Introduction Fractal Geometry constitutes today one of the most fertile areas of investigation nowadays. Practically all the branches of scientific knowledge, like biology, mathematics, geology, chemistry, engineering, medicine, etc. have applied fractals to simulate and explain behaviors difficult to understand through traditional methods. Also in the world of computer aided design, fractal sets have shown up with strength, with numerous software applications using design tools based on fractal techniques. These techniques basically allow the effective and realistic reproduction of any kind of forms and textures that appear in nature: trees and plants, rocks and minerals, clouds, water, etc. For modern computer graphics, the access to these techniques, combined with ray tracing allow to create incredible landscapes and effects.
  • Laplace's Deterministic Paradise Lost ?

    Laplace's Deterministic Paradise Lost ?

    “We may regard the present state of the universe as the effect of its past and the cause of its future. An intellect which at a certain moment would know all forces that set nature in motion, and all positions of all items of which nature is composed, if this intellect were also vast enough to submit these data to analysis, it would embrace in a single formula the movements Laplace’s deterministic paradise lost of the greatest bodies of the universe and those of the tiniest atom; for such an intellect nothing would be uncertain and the future just like the past would be present before its eyes.” Miguel Angel Fuentes Santa Fe Institute, USA Pierre-Simon Laplace, ~1800 Instituto Balseiro and CONICET, Argentina Santa Fe Institute Santa Fe Institute Comments: Heisenberg uncertainty principle In the framework of quantum mechanics -one of the most successful created theories- is not possible to know -at the Einstein was very unhappy about this apparent randomness same time- the position and velocity of a given object. (~1927) in nature. His views were summed up in his famous phrase, 'God does not play dice.' ∆v ∆x m > h v v v (from Stephen Hawking’s lecture) ? Santa Fe Institute Santa Fe Institute In chaotic (deterministic) systems Same functionality (SAME ORGANISM) x(t) Not chaotic trajectory x(0) = c ∆x ± t ? Some expected initial condition + Mutations Santa Fe Institute Santa Fe Institute Same functionality (SAME ORGANISM) Many process can happen between regular-chaotic behavior Chaotic trajectory Some expected initial condition + Mutations Santa Fe Institute Santa Fe Institute 4.1 Parameter Dependence of the Iterates 35 4.1 Parameter Dependence of the Iterates 35 r values are densely interwr values oarevedenselyn andinterwoneovfindsen and onea sensitifinds a sensitive dependenceve dependence ononparameterparametervalues.values.
  • Rendering Hypercomplex Fractals Anthony Atella Anthonyatella@Gmail.Com

    Rendering Hypercomplex Fractals Anthony Atella [email protected]

    Rhode Island College Digital Commons @ RIC Honors Projects Overview Honors Projects 2018 Rendering Hypercomplex Fractals Anthony Atella [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/honors_projects Part of the Computer Sciences Commons, and the Other Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Atella, Anthony, "Rendering Hypercomplex Fractals" (2018). Honors Projects Overview. 136. https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/honors_projects/136 This Honors is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Projects at Digital Commons @ RIC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Projects Overview by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ RIC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rendering Hypercomplex Fractals by Anthony Atella An Honors Project Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for Honors in The Department of Mathematics and Computer Science The School of Arts and Sciences Rhode Island College 2018 Abstract Fractal mathematics and geometry are useful for applications in science, engineering, and art, but acquiring the tools to explore and graph fractals can be frustrating. Tools available online have limited fractals, rendering methods, and shaders. They often fail to abstract these concepts in a reusable way. This means that multiple programs and interfaces must be learned and used to fully explore the topic. Chaos is an abstract fractal geometry rendering program created to solve this problem. This application builds off previous work done by myself and others [1] to create an extensible, abstract solution to rendering fractals. This paper covers what fractals are, how they are rendered and colored, implementation, issues that were encountered, and finally planned future improvements.
  • Measuring the Fractal Dimensions of Empirical Cartographic Curves

    Measuring the Fractal Dimensions of Empirical Cartographic Curves

    MEASURING THE FRACTAL DIMENSIONS OF EMPIRICAL CARTOGRAPHIC CURVES Mark C. Shelberg Cartographer, Techniques Office Aerospace Cartography Department Defense Mapping Agency Aerospace Center St. Louis, AFS, Missouri 63118 Harold Moellering Associate Professor Department of Geography Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210 Nina Lam Assistant Professor Department of Geography Ohio State University Columbus, Ohio 43210 Abstract The fractal dimension of a curve is a measure of its geometric complexity and can be any non-integer value between 1 and 2 depending upon the curve's level of complexity. This paper discusses an algorithm, which simulates walking a pair of dividers along a curve, used to calculate the fractal dimensions of curves. It also discusses the choice of chord length and the number of solution steps used in computing fracticality. Results demonstrate the algorithm to be stable and that a curve's fractal dimension can be closely approximated. Potential applications for this technique include a new means for curvilinear data compression, description of planimetric feature boundary texture for improved realism in scene generation and possible two-dimensional extension for description of surface feature textures. INTRODUCTION The problem of describing the forms of curves has vexed researchers over the years. For example, a coastline is neither straight, nor circular, nor elliptic and therefore Euclidean lines cannot adquately describe most real world linear features. Imagine attempting to describe the boundaries of clouds or outlines of complicated coastlines in terms of classical geometry. An intriguing concept proposed by Mandelbrot (1967, 1977) is to use fractals to fill the void caused by the absence of suitable geometric representations.

  • Learning from Benoit Mandelbrot

    2/28/18, 7(59 AM Page 1 of 1 February 27, 2018 Learning from Benoit Mandelbrot If you've been reading some of my recent posts, you will have noted my, and the Investment Masters belief, that many of the investment theories taught in most business schools are flawed. And they can be dangerous too, the recent Financial Crisis is evidence of as much. One man who, prior to the Financial Crisis, issued a challenge to regulators including the Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, to recognise these flaws and develop more realistic risk models was Benoit Mandelbrot. Over the years I've read a lot of investment books, and the name Benoit Mandelbrot comes up from time to time. I recently finished his book 'The (Mis)Behaviour of Markets - A Fractal View of Risk, Ruin and Reward'. So who was Benoit Mandelbrot, why is he famous, and what can we learn from him? Benoit Mandelbrot was a Polish-born mathematician and polymath, a Sterling Professor of Mathematical Sciences at Yale University and IBM Fellow Emeritus (Physics) who developed a new branch of mathematics known as 'Fractal' geometry. This geometry recognises the hidden order in the seemingly disordered, the plan in the unplanned, the regular pattern in the irregularity and roughness of nature. It has been successfully applied to the natural sciences helping model weather, study river flows, analyse brainwaves and seismic tremors. A 'fractal' is defined as a rough or fragmented shape that can be split into parts, each of which is at least a close approximation of its original-self.
  • Self-Organized Complexity in the Physical, Biological, and Social Sciences

    Self-Organized Complexity in the Physical, Biological, and Social Sciences

    Introduction Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences Donald L. Turcotte*† and John B. Rundle‡ *Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853; and ‡Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309 he National Academy of Sciences convened an Arthur M. A complex phenomenon is said to exhibit self-organizing TSackler Colloquium on ‘‘Self-organized complexity in the phys- complexity only if it has some form of power-law (fractal) ical, biological, and social sciences’’ at the NAS Beckman Center, scaling. It should be emphasized, however, that the power-law Irvine, CA, on March 23–24, 2001. The organizers were D.L.T. scaling may be applicable only over a limited range of scales. (Cornell), J.B.R. (Colorado), and Hans Frauenfelder (Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM). The organizers had no Networks difficulty in finding many examples of complexity in subjects Another classic example of self-organizing complexity is drain- ranging from fluid turbulence to social networks. However, an age networks. These networks are characterized by the concept acceptable definition for self-organizing complexity is much more of stream order. The smallest streams are first-order streams— elusive. Symptoms of systems that exhibit self-organizing complex- two first-order streams merge to form a second-order stream, ity include fractal statistics and chaotic behavior. Some examples of two second-order streams merge to form a third-order stream, such systems are completely deterministic (i.e., fluid turbulence), and so forth. Drainage networks satisfy the fractal relation Eq.
  • Role of Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos in Applied Sciences

    Role of Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos in Applied Sciences

    v.;.;.:.:.:.;.;.^ ROLE OF NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND CHAOS IN APPLIED SCIENCES by Quissan V. Lawande and Nirupam Maiti Theoretical Physics Oivisipn 2000 Please be aware that all of the Missing Pages in this document were originally blank pages BARC/2OOO/E/OO3 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ROLE OF NONLINEAR DYNAMICS AND CHAOS IN APPLIED SCIENCES by Quissan V. Lawande and Nirupam Maiti Theoretical Physics Division BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE MUMBAI, INDIA 2000 BARC/2000/E/003 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DESCRIPTION SHEET FOR TECHNICAL REPORT (as per IS : 9400 - 1980) 01 Security classification: Unclassified • 02 Distribution: External 03 Report status: New 04 Series: BARC External • 05 Report type: Technical Report 06 Report No. : BARC/2000/E/003 07 Part No. or Volume No. : 08 Contract No.: 10 Title and subtitle: Role of nonlinear dynamics and chaos in applied sciences 11 Collation: 111 p., figs., ills. 13 Project No. : 20 Personal authors): Quissan V. Lawande; Nirupam Maiti 21 Affiliation ofauthor(s): Theoretical Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 22 Corporate authoifs): Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai - 400 085 23 Originating unit : Theoretical Physics Division, BARC, Mumbai 24 Sponsors) Name: Department of Atomic Energy Type: Government Contd...(ii) -l- 30 Date of submission: January 2000 31 Publication/Issue date: February 2000 40 Publisher/Distributor: Head, Library and Information Services Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 42 Form of distribution: Hard copy 50 Language of text: English 51 Language of summary: English 52 No. of references: 40 refs. 53 Gives data on: Abstract: Nonlinear dynamics manifests itself in a number of phenomena in both laboratory and day to day dealings.
  • Fractals, Self-Similarity & Structures

    Fractals, Self-Similarity & Structures

    © Landesmuseum für Kärnten; download www.landesmuseum.ktn.gv.at/wulfenia; www.biologiezentrum.at Wulfenia 9 (2002): 1–7 Mitteilungen des Kärntner Botanikzentrums Klagenfurt Fractals, self-similarity & structures Dmitry D. Sokoloff Summary: We present a critical discussion of a quite new mathematical theory, namely fractal geometry, to isolate its possible applications to plant morphology and plant systematics. In particular, fractal geometry deals with sets with ill-defined numbers of elements. We believe that this concept could be useful to describe biodiversity in some groups that have a complicated taxonomical structure. Zusammenfassung: In dieser Arbeit präsentieren wir eine kritische Diskussion einer völlig neuen mathematischen Theorie, der fraktalen Geometrie, um mögliche Anwendungen in der Pflanzen- morphologie und Planzensystematik aufzuzeigen. Fraktale Geometrie behandelt insbesondere Reihen mit ungenügend definierten Anzahlen von Elementen. Wir meinen, dass dieses Konzept in einigen Gruppen mit komplizierter taxonomischer Struktur zur Beschreibung der Biodiversität verwendbar ist. Keywords: mathematical theory, fractal geometry, self-similarity, plant morphology, plant systematics Critical editions of Dean Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels (see e.g. SWIFT 1926) recognize a precise scale invariance with a factor 12 between the world of Lilliputians, our world and that one of Brobdingnag’s giants. Swift sarcastically followed the development of contemporary science and possibly knew that even in the previous century GALILEO (1953) noted that the physical laws are not scale invariant. In fact, the mass of a body is proportional to L3, where L is the size of the body, whilst its skeletal rigidity is proportional to L2. Correspondingly, giant’s skeleton would be 122=144 times less rigid than that of a Lilliputian and would be destroyed by its own weight if L were large enough (cf.