DOCSLIB.ORG

Ho Tung Gardens) Notice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ho Tung Gardens) Notice CB(1)1478/10-11(01) Subcommittee on Antiquities and Monuments (Declaration of Proposed Monument)(Ho Tung Gardens) Notice Response to Members’ request for information made at the meeting held on 23 February 2011 1. To provide information on the principles, criteria, factors of consideration, procedures and mechanism for determining the grading of historic buildings, and for declaring a place, a building site, or a structure as a proposed monument. Determining grading of historic buildings The grading of historic buildings is an administrative mechanism to provide an objective basis for determining the heritage value and preservation need of individual historic buildings. Historic buildings meeting the following thresholds are given either a Grade 1, Grade 2 or Grade 3 status by the Antiquities Advisory Board1 (AAB): (a) Grade 1 status refers to buildings of outstanding merit, which every effort should be made to preserve if possible. (b) Grade 2 status refers to buildings of special merit; efforts should be made to selectively preserve. (c) Grade 3 status refers to buildings of some merit; preservation in some form would be desirable and alternative means could be considered if preservation is not practicable. 2. In 2002-2004, the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) carried out an in-depth survey of 1 444 buildings2 with higher heritage value. As recommended by the AAB in December 2004, an expert panel comprising historians as well as members of the Hong Kong Institute of Architects, the Hong Kong Institute of Planners and the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers was formed to assess the heritage value of these buildings based on the findings of the in-depth survey and the assessment approach endorsed by the AAB. 1 The AAB is an independent statutory body established under section 17 of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53) to advise the Antiquities Authority any matters relating to antiquities, proposed monuments or monuments or referred to it for consultation under section 2A(1), section 3(1) or section 6(4) of the Ordinance. 2 These 1 444 buildings were selected from some 8 800 buildings in Hong Kong built mainly before 1950, which were covered in a territory-wide survey conducted by the AMO in 1996 to 2000. 2 3. Under the endorsed assessment approach, each building was first assessed individually against six criteria, namely historical interest, architectural merit, group value, social value and local interest, authenticity and rarity. This assessment was then refined based on a comparison with other buildings having regard to the following three parameters – (a) historical - illustrating a particular historical development with a specific theme; (b) typological - being the key exemplars of particular building types and architectural styles; and (c) contextual - building group able to reflect the development of a settlement/cluster, and its social, cultural and economic lives. 4. The expert panel completed the assessment of the 1 444 historic buildings in February 2009, with a proposed grading (Grade 1, Grade 2, Grade 3 or nil grade) being assigned to each building. Following consideration by the AAB in March 2009, the AMO conducted a public consultation exercise from March to September 2009 on the proposed gradings. The AMO also wrote to the owners of these buildings to invite their views on the proposed gradings. The expert panel subsequently reviewed the proposed gradings, taking account of the views and additional information received from members of the public and the owners, and made adjustments as necessary. The expert panel’s recommended gradings were then submitted to the AAB for consideration and confirmation. Apart from the 1 444 buildings, there were also suggestions for additional buildings to be graded. These suggestions are considered by the expert panel and the AAB in accordance with the same approach outlined in paragraph 3 above. As at the end of January 2011, the AAB has confirmed the gradings of more than 1 100 historic buildings. 5. The prevailing selection principles in identifying historic buildings in Hong Kong and the methodology for evaluating their heritage value are derived having regard to well-recognised principles and practices adopted in other places (such as Canada, UK, Australia and China), international documents on heritage conservation (including the International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites (commonly referred to as the Venice Charter), the Australia ICOMOS Charter for the Conservation of Places of Cultural Significance (commonly referred to as the Burra Charter) and the Principles for the 3 Conservation of Heritage Sites in China (China ICOMOS)) as well as our local circumstances. Declaration of monuments and proposed monuments 6. Under Section 3 of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53)(the Ordinance), the Antiquities Authority (i.e. the Secretary for Development) may, after consultation with the AAB and with the approval of the Chief Executive, declare a place, building, site or structure, which the Authority considers to be of public interest by reason of its historical significance, to be a monument by notice in the Gazette. Prior consultation with the owner will be made. 7. In November 2008, the AAB endorsed the establishment of a formal relationship between the statutory monument declaration system and the administrative grading system for historic buildings of the AAB. 8. Under the endorsed arrangements, the list of Grade 1 buildings, defined as “buildings of outstanding merit, which every effort should be made to preserve if possible”, will be regarded as a pool of highly valuable heritage buildings for consideration by the Antiquities Authority as to whether some of these may have reached the “high threshold” of monuments to be put under statutory protection. However, such a linkage would not oblige the Antiquities Authority to declare all Grade 1 buildings as monuments. 9. The Antiquities Authority is committed to actively considering each and every of the Grade 1 buildings for possible monument declaration. Given the resources required, the Authority will naturally have to prioritise the list of Grade 1 buildings for consideration, based on such factors as the buildings’ heritage significance, demolition risks, the owners’ and the public’s aspirations, etc. 10. The Antiquities Authority may take action to declare a building as a proposed monument under section 2A(1) of the Ordinance if the building needs immediate statutory protection (e.g. if the building is under threat of demolition or alteration/ renovation works are proposed to be carried out which may affect the heritage value of the building). 11. Under section 2A(1) of the Ordinance, the Antiquities Authority may, after consultation with the AAB and by notice in the Gazette, declare a place, building, site or structure to be a proposed monument. The declaration has effect for 12 months from the date of gazettal and it cannot be extended beyond the 12-month period for privately-owned 4 properties. 12. Under section 6(1) of the Ordinance, except in accordance with a permit granted by the Antiquities Authority, no person shall – (a) excavate, carry on building or other works, plant or fell trees or deposit earth or refuse on or in a proposed monument; or (b) demolish, remove, obstruct, deface or interfere with a proposed monument. 13. Hence, the declaration of a historic site or building as a proposed monument will effectively protect the site or building from damage within the specified period, during which the Antiquities Authority could consider in a more comprehensive manner whether the site or building should be declared as a monument and the Administration and the owner could continue discussion on feasible preservation options. 2. To provide information on the principles, criteria and the mechanism for determining the form and amount of compensation and the economic incentives to be provided to the owners of proposed monuments and graded historic buildings. Compensation to owners of proposed monuments 14. Section 8 of the Ordinance stipulates a mechanism for the Antiquities Authority to pay compensation to the owner of a proposed monument in respect of financial loss suffered or likely to be suffered by him by reason of – (a) the exercise by the Antiquities Authority, or by a designated person authorized by him, of the powers specified in section 5(1) of the Ordinance3; and (b) refusal by the Antiquities Authority to grant a permit for carrying out building, demolition or other works or actions at 3 Section 5(1) of the Ordinance provides – “Subject to this section, the Authority, and any designated person authorized by him in writing, may, for the purposes of this Ordinance, at all reasonable times- (a) enter and inspect any proposed monument or monument; (b) with the prior approval of the Chief Executive- (i) fence, repair, maintain, preserve or restore any proposed monument or monument; (ii) excavate or search for relics in any proposed monument or monument and remove any relics hitherto undiscovered.” 5 the proposed monument as provided in section 6(1) of the Ordinance. 15. The amount of compensation may be agreed between the owner and the Antiquities Authority on a case-by-case basis having regard to the specific circumstances of each case. In default of such an agreement, the owner may apply to the District Court to assess the amount of compensation payable under section 8 of the Ordinance. The District Court may award to the applicant such compensation as it thinks reasonable in the circumstances. Economic incentives for owners to preserve privately-owned historic buildings 16. Under the new heritage conservation policy announced by the Chief Executive in October 2007, the Administration acknowledges the need to provide suitable economic incentives to encourage private owners to preserve historic buildings in their ownership. We have informed the owners of the 1444 historic buildings of all forms of assistance available to encourage preservation, including discussing with them appropriate forms of economic incentives if the case so requires.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HONG KONG STYLE URBAN CONSERVATION Dr. Lynne D. Distefano, Dr. Ho-Yin Lee Architectural Conservation Programme Department Of
    Theme 1 Session 1 HONG KONG STYLE URBAN CONSERVATION Dr. Lynne D. DiStefano, Dr. Ho-Yin Lee Architectural Conservation Programme Department of Architecture The University of Hong Kong [email protected], [email protected] Katie Cummer The University of Hong Kong [email protected] Abstract. This paper examines the evolution of the field of conservation in the city of Hong Kong. In parti- cular, highlighting the ways in which conservation and urban development can be complementary forces instead of in opposition. The city of Hong Kong will be briefly introduced, along with the characteristics that define and influence its conservation, before moving on to the catalyst for Hong Kong’s conservation para- digm shift. The paper will proceed to highlight the various conservation initiatives embarked upon by the Hong Kong SAR’s Development Bureau, concluding with a discussion of the bureau’s accomplishments and challenges for the future. Introduction: Hong Kong Yet, Hong Kong is more than its harbour and more than a sea of high rises. Hong Kong’s main island, Usually, when people think of Hong Kong, the first what is properly called Hong Kong Island, is one of image that comes to mind is the “harbourscape” of some 200 islands and one of three distinct parts of the north shore of Hong Kong Island (Figure 1). This the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. is a landscape of high-rise buildings pressed together Hong Kong Island was leased to the British as a and protected at the back by lush hills, terminating in treaty port in 1841. From the beginning, the City of what is called “The Peak.
    [Show full text]
  • LC Paper No. CB(2)1105/07-08(01) for Discussion on 22 February
    LC Paper No. CB(2)1105/07-08(01) For discussion on 22 February 2008 Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs Subcommittee on Heritage Conservation Preservation of King Yin Lei at 45 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong PURPOSE This paper informs Members of the latest position regarding the declaration of King Yin Lei (including the associated buildings and its garden) (the “Building”) as a proposed monument on 15 September 2007 (L.N. 175 of 2007 refers) and seek Members’ views on the preservation proposals. BACKGROUND 2. The declaration of the Building as a proposed monument was made by the Authority (i.e. Secretary for Development) on 15 September 2007 after consultation with the Antiquities Advisory Board (AAB) under section 2A of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53). The purposes of the declaration are to give the Building temporary statutory protection from further damage (the Building faced an immediate threat as some works had been carried out at the site to remove the roof tiles, stone features and window frames of the Building), to allow a period of up to 12 months for the Authority to consider in a comprehensive manner whether it should be declared as a monument and to discuss with the owner feasible options for preservation of the Building. Unless it is withdrawn earlier, the proposed monument declaration will expire after 14 September 2008. ASSESSMENT OF HERITAGE VALUE 3. Subsequent to the proposed monument declaration, the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) has engaged experts both locally and from the Mainland to assess the heritage value of the Building and the scale of damage to the Building, and to advise on possible restoration options.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation of King Yin Lei at 45 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong
    LC Paper No. CB(2)1105/07-08(01) For discussion on 22 February 2008 Legislative Council Panel on Home Affairs Subcommittee on Heritage Conservation Preservation of King Yin Lei at 45 Stubbs Road, Hong Kong PURPOSE This paper informs Members of the latest position regarding the declaration of King Yin Lei (including the associated buildings and its garden) (the “Building”) as a proposed monument on 15 September 2007 (L.N. 175 of 2007 refers) and seek Members’ views on the preservation proposals. BACKGROUND 2. The declaration of the Building as a proposed monument was made by the Authority (i.e. Secretary for Development) on 15 September 2007 after consultation with the Antiquities Advisory Board (AAB) under section 2A of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53). The purposes of the declaration are to give the Building temporary statutory protection from further damage (the Building faced an immediate threat as some works had been carried out at the site to remove the roof tiles, stone features and window frames of the Building), to allow a period of up to 12 months for the Authority to consider in a comprehensive manner whether it should be declared as a monument and to discuss with the owner feasible options for preservation of the Building. Unless it is withdrawn earlier, the proposed monument declaration will expire after 14 September 2008. ASSESSMENT OF HERITAGE VALUE 3. Subsequent to the proposed monument declaration, the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) has engaged experts both locally and from the Mainland to assess the heritage value of the Building and the scale of damage to the Building, and to advise on possible restoration options.
    [Show full text]
  • For Discussion on 15 July 2011
    CB(1)2690/10-11(03) For discussion on 15 July 2011 Legislative Council Panel on Development Progress Report on Heritage Conservation Initiatives and Revitalisation of the Old Tai Po Police Station, the Blue House Cluster and the Stone Houses under the Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme PURPOSE This paper updates Members on the progress made on the heritage conservation initiatives under Development Bureau’s purview since our last progress report in November 2010 (Legislative Council (LegCo) Paper No. CB(1)467/10-11(04)), and invites Members’ views on our future work. It also seeks Members’ support for the funding application for revitalising the Old Tai Po Police Station, the Blue House Cluster and the Stone Houses under the Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme (Revitalisation Scheme). PROGRESS MADE ON HERITAGE CONSERVATION INITIATIVES Public Domain Revitalisation Scheme Batch I 2. For the six projects under Batch I of the Revitalisation Scheme, the latest position is as follows – (a) Former North Kowloon Magistracy – The site has been revitalised and adaptively re-used as the Savannah College of Art and Design (SCAD) Hong Kong Campus for the provision of non-local higher education courses in the fields of art and design. Commencing operation in September 2010, SCAD Hong Kong is the first completed project under the Revitalisation Scheme. For the Fall 2010 term, 141 students were enrolled, of which about 40% are local students. In April 2011, SCAD Hong Kong obtained accreditation from the Hong Kong Council for Accreditation of Academic and Vocational Qualifications for five years for 14 programmes it offers at the Hong Kong campus.
    [Show full text]
  • DEVB(W)-E2.Doc
    Index page Director of Bureau: Secretary for Development Session No: 9 File name : DEVB(W)-e2.doc Reply Question Reply Question Reply Question Serial No. Serial No. Serial No. Serial No. Serial No. Serial No. DEVB(W)001 0080 DEVB(W)031 2070 DEVB(W)061 0854 DEVB(W)002 0081 DEVB(W)032 2088 DEVB(W)062 0855 DEVB(W)003 0082 DEVB(W)033 2104 DEVB(W)063 1378 DEVB(W)004 0084 DEVB(W)034 2141 DEVB(W)064 1380 DEVB(W)005 0166 DEVB(W)035 2222 DEVB(W)065 1409 DEVB(W)006 0167 DEVB(W)036 2322 DEVB(W)066 1987 DEVB(W)007 0168 DEVB(W)037 2424 DEVB(W)067 2016 DEVB(W)008 0173 DEVB(W)038 2568 DEVB(W)068 2572 DEVB(W)009 0301 DEVB(W)039 2592 DEVB(W)069 2934 DEVB(W)010 0302 DEVB(W)040 2756 DEVB(W)070 3046 DEVB(W)011 0363 DEVB(W)041 2963 DEVB(W)071 0716 DEVB(W)012 0405 DEVB(W)042 3018 DEVB(W)072 0717 DEVB(W)013 0519 DEVB(W)043 3245 DEVB(W)073 0125 DEVB(W)014 0520 DEVB(W)044 0399 DEVB(W)074 1126 DEVB(W)015 0521 DEVB(W)045 0634 DEVB(W)075 1127 DEVB(W)016 0522 DEVB(W)046 0635 DEVB(W)076 0147 DEVB(W)017 0589 DEVB(W)047 1769 DEVB(W)077 0148 DEVB(W)018 0641 DEVB(W)048 2001 DEVB(W)078 0219 DEVB(W)019 0666 DEVB(W)049 0273 DEVB(W)079 0482 DEVB(W)020 1041 DEVB(W)050 0459 DEVB(W)080 0507 DEVB(W)021 1096 DEVB(W)051 0484 DEVB(W)081 0639 DEVB(W)022 1154 DEVB(W)052 0509 DEVB(W)082 0681 DEVB(W)023 1155 DEVB(W)053 2965 DEVB(W)083 1039 DEVB(W)024 1404 DEVB(W)054 1994 DEVB(W)084 1040 DEVB(W)025 1523 DEVB(W)055 0049 DEVB(W)085 1405 DEVB(W)026 1524 DEVB(W)056 0281 DEVB(W)086 2773 DEVB(W)027 1525 DEVB(W)057 0463 DEVB(W)087 2851 DEVB(W)028 1569 DEVB(W)058 0488 DEVB(W)088 2853 DEVB(W)029 1885 DEVB(W)059 0523 DEVB(W)089 2953 DEVB(W)030 1979 DEVB(W)060 0851 DEVB(W)090 3045 Reply Question Reply Question Reply Question Serial No.
    [Show full text]
  • New Item Nos. N337, N338 & N261
    N337 Historic Building Appraisal Entrance Gate San Wai, Ha Tsuen, Yuen Long, New Territories The entrance gate of San Wai (新圍), which literally means “new Historical walled village”,1 is situated in a local district known as Ha Tsuen (廈村) or Interest Ha Tsuen Heung (廈村鄉).2 Ha Tsuen was founded by two brothers, Tang Hung-chi (鄧洪贄) and Tang Hung-wai (鄧洪惠), both ninth generation members of the Ng Yuen Tso (五元祖) of the Tang (鄧) clan.3 As one of the oldest villages in Ha Tsuen, San Wai has a history of more than 250 years. It was established by Tang Tso-tai (鄧作泰, 1695 – 1756), an eighteenth generation member of the Ng Yuen Tso, and Tang Wai-yuk (鄧為玉, 1715 – 1755), a generation younger than Tso-tai. The village’s name “新圍” in Chinese and “San Wai” in English can be identified from a government report of 1899 and a land record of the then colonial government dating from 1905 to 1907. Regarding its layout, San Wai is composed of rows of houses, with an entrance gate. It is believed that the entrance gate was originally situated on the central axis of the village. As the village expanded, this central axis gradually lost its significance, and the view from the entrance gate was eventually blocked by rows of houses. A map dated 1917, which is the earliest record of its kind identified, shows that by that time two rows of houses had been built in front of the entrance gate.4 Interestingly, no shrine was built within San Wai, as villagers believe that the village is “protected” by the Earth God shrine near the Yeung Hau Temple (楊侯古廟), which is locally known as Sai Tau Miu (西頭廟, western temple).
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Hong Kong's Cultural Heritage
    SAVING HONG KONG’S CULTURAL HERITAGE BY CECILIA CHU AND KYLIE UEBEGANG February 2002 Civic Exchange Room 601, Hoseinee House, 69 Wyndham Street, Central Tel: 2893-0213 Fax: 3105-9713 www.civic-exchange.org TABLE OF CONTENTS. page n.o ABBREVIATIONS AND TERMINOLOGY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………………..….. 3 INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………….……. 4 PART I: CONSERVING HONG KONG 1. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK…………………………………… 6 1.1 WHY CONSERVE? …………………………………………….. 6 1.2 HERITAGE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT .…………..…. 6 1.3 CHALLENGES OF HERITAGE CONSERVATION ……………..….. 7 1.4 AN OVERVIEW OF HERITAGE CONSERVATION IN HONG KONG… 7 2. PRACTICAL FRAMEWORK 2.1 EXISTING HERITAGE CONSERVATION FRAMEWORK …………. 9 • LEGAL FRAMEWORK ……………………………………..…….10 • ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK …..………………….. 13 • TOURISM BODIES ……………………………..……… 14 • INTERNATIONAL BODIES …………………….………. 15 • PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION .………….……….. 17 2.2 CONSTRAINTS WITH THE EXISTING HERITAGE CONSERVATION FRAMEWORK • OVERALL ……………………………………………… 19 • LEGAL FRAMEWORK ..………………………………… 21 • ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK ………...…………….. 24 • TOURISM BODIES ….…………………………………… *27 PART II: ACHIEVING CONSERVATION 3. RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1 OVERALL ……..………………………………………………. 29 3.2 LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE .………...……...………………….. 33 4. CASE STUDIES 4.1 NGA TSIN WAI VILLAGE …….………………………………. 34 4.2 YAUMATEI DISTRICT ………………………………………... 38 CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………………… 42 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ………………………………………………………………. 43 ABBREVIATIONS AAB Antiquities Advisory Board AFCD Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department
    [Show full text]
  • Matters Arising and Progress Report
    For information BOARD PAPER on 22 March 2012 AAB/33/2011-12 MEMORANDUM FOR MEMBERS OF THE ANTIQUITIES ADVISORY BOARD PROGRESS REPORT PURPOSE This paper informs Members of the progress of major heritage issues and activities of the Antiquities and Monuments Office (AMO) since November 2011. HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES Declaration of Monuments King’s College and School House of St. Stephen’s College 2. With the Antiquities Advisory Board (AAB)’s support and the Chief Executive’s approval, the School House of St. Stephen’s College and the east, south and north wings of the school building together with parts of the retaining walls and boundary walls of King’s College were declared as monuments under the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (the Ordinance) (Cap. 53) by notice in the Gazette on 2 December 2011. The schools arranged publicity activities on 17 December 2011 to celebrate the declaration. Ho Tung Gardens 3. The AAB supported the declaration of Ho Tung Gardens as a monument at its meeting on 24 October 2011. A notice of the intended declaration was served on the owner of Ho Tung Gardens on 25 October 2011 under section 4(2) of the Ordinance. The owner submitted a petition to the Chief Executive under section 4(3) of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (the Ordinance) to object to the intended declaration of Ho Tung Gardens as a monument and request the Chief Executive to direct that the intended monument declaration shall not be made. The Chief Executive has subsequently directed under section 4(4) of the Ordinance that the objection be 2 referred to the Chief Executive in Council for consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017/18
    ANNUAL REPORT 2017/18 4/F, Prime Mansion, 183-187 Johnston Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong | T 2849 6138 | www.cdchk.org CONTENTS ABOUT US 3 ABOUT US The Child Development Centre (“CDC”) is a not-for-profit organisation, informally set up in 1976 and officially constituted in 1978. For over 40 years, the CDC has provided 4 MESSAGE FROM OUR CHAIRMAN support to a wide spectrum of children with Special Educational Needs (SEN) in English and Chinese. 6 HIGHLIGHTS OF YEAR 2016-2017 Our staff members adopt an interdisciplinary approach to facilitate children’s development taking into account the children’s individual needs. We provide them 8 DELIVERING GROWTH with services such as assessments, group setting early intervention programmes, speech therapy, occupational therapy, sensory processing, social skills training, attention and 10 SUPPORTING PARENTS & FAMILIES behavioural support to ignite their learning journeys. 13 SHARING EXPERIENCE & INSIGHT Aside from providing educational services for children, the CDC is also committed to serving their families as well as the whole community. We help empower parents as well 16 INNOVATION as child-care professionals through family support and counselling services, professional school support and child development training. 18 STAFF DEVELOPMENT 20 LOOKING AHEAD Igniting Learning Journeys, one child at a time 22 GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES 24 THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Vision For every child to succeed in their unique learning journey. 25 ORGANISATION CHART 26 FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Mission 27 HONORARY AUDITORS’ REPORT To provide quality learning experiences for the individual child and empowering their families. 30 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 2 3 As our society evolves, we believe that the CDC should foster wider partnerships within the community to raise public awareness of children with SEN.
    [Show full text]
  • Batch III of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme Press Conference
    Batch III of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme Press Conference 7 October 2011 Background of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme z In the 2007-08 Policy Address, the Chief Executive announced a range of initiatives to enhance heritage conservation. z Launching of “Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme” to put Government-owned historic buildings to good adaptive re-use. z The Government has reserved $2 billion for the “Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme” (including revitalising the Former Police Married Quarters on Hollywood Road into “PMQ”). 2 2 1 Objectives of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme z To preserve and put historic buildings into good and innovative use. z To transform historic buildings into unique cultural landmarks. z To promote active public participation in the conservation of historic buildings. z To create job opportunities, in particular at the district level. 3 3 Set up of the Advisory Committee on Revitalisation of Historic Buildings z The Committee is chaired by Mr Bernard Chan with 9 non- official members from the fields of historical research, architecture, surveying, social enterprise, finance, etc. z To provide advice on the implementation of the Revitalisation Scheme and other revitalisation projects. z To help assess applications under the Scheme. z To monitor the subsequent operation of the selected projects. 4 4 2 Assessment Criteria of Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme The Advisory Committee examines and assesses the applications in accordance with the following five assessment criteria: z Reflection of historical value and significance z Technical aspects z Social value and social enterprise operation z Financial viability z Management capability and other considerations 5 5 Review of Batch I of Revitalisation Scheme z Batch I of the Revitalisation Scheme was launched in February 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • The Office of the Commissioner for Heritage of Development Bureau Is
    The Office of the Commissioner for Heritage of Development Bureau is inviting HKIA members to attend a public forum jointly organised by the Development Bureau and the Wan Chai District Council on 26 May 2011 at the Leighton Hill Community Hall to offer your views on the revitalization of King Yin Lei. Admission to the public forum is free. Details of the forum are as follows : Date : 26 May 2011 (Thursday) Time : 7:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. Venue : Leighton Hill Community Hall 133 Wong Nai Chung Road, Happy Valley, Hong Kong. Chairperson: Mr. LEE Kui-biu Robin, Acting Commissioner for Heritage, Development Bureau Guest Speakers: Mr SUEN Kai-cheong, BBS, MH, JP, Chairman, Wan Chai District Council Mr NG Kam-chun, Stephen, MH, JP, Vice-Chairman, Wan Chai District Council Mr WONG Wang-tai, Chairman, Works and Facilities Management Committee Wan Chai District Council District Dr LEE Ho-yin Director, Architectural Conservation Programme Department of Architecture, the University of Hong Kong Participants : Members of Wan Chai District Council Members of Wan Chai Mid-Levels Area Committee Representatives from schools and hospital in the vicinity of King Yin Lei Local residents in the vicinity of King Yin Lei Representatives from local professional and academic institutions The Development Bureau will include King Yin Lei in the Revitalising Historic Buildings Through Partnership Scheme (Revitalisation Scheme) Batch III. Government will fund the revitalisation works and invite non-profit making organisations to operate the revitalised King Yin Lei to provide services or business in the form of social enterprise on the prerequisite that the social enterprise is projected to become self-sustainable after the initial period.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and Custom
    383 Chapter 18 Religion and Custom As a predominantly Chinese society, Buddhism and Taoism followers outnumber those of other religions in Hong Kong. But other religions are also practised with great fervour — in churches, mosques, temples and synagogues. The freedom of worship is cherished in Hong Kong, and is enshrined in Hong Kong’s constitutional document, the Basic Law. Hong Kong residents enjoy religious freedom under the Basic Law and relevant legislation. Religions practised in Hong Kong include Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism and Judaism. Some religious bodies also run schools, and health and welfare facilities. Traditional Festivals The Lunar New Year is the most important date in the Chinese festival calendar. It is celebrated during the days of the first new moon of the year, an auspicious time for friends and relatives to visit each other and to exchange gifts while children and unmarried adults receive lai see, or ‘lucky’ money in red packets. The Dragon Boat Festival is celebrated on the fifth day of the fifth lunar month to honour an ancient Chinese poet, Qu Yuan, who killed himself by jumping into a river rather than compromise his honour. Dragon boat races and the eating of rice dumplings, wrapped in bamboo leaves, are the highlights of this festival. For the Mid-Autumn Festival, on the 15th day of the eighth lunar month, grown-ups and children gather under the full moon with colourful lanterns and eat mooncakes, a traditional festival delicacy. The Ching Ming Festival in spring and the Chung Yeung Festival in autumn are marked by visits to ancestral graves.
    [Show full text]