Conference Program

Building the knowledge base 2017 for effective team science

June 12-14, 2017 Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach Resort & Spa Clearwater Beach, FL www.scienceofteamscience.org

Science of Team Science (SciTS) 2017 Conference Day 1: Monday, June 12 1 Aqualea Ballroom C Aqualea Ballroom AB Workshop 6: Workshop Collaborative : We How Facilitating Conduct Together Workshop 3: Workshop Enhancing Team Science Effectiveness Training Team through Longboat Key Longboat Key Workshop 5: Workshop Network Perspectives Understand and to Science Enable Team Workshop 2: Workshop for Improvisation and Critical Leadership with Communication sideCoach Conference Schedule At-a-Glance Conference Sand Key Sand Key Heidi Gardner, Harvard University Heidi Gardner, Aqualea Ballroom AB Hour Session and Happy Poster Gallery and Siesta Key Networking Hors d’oeuvres with Substantial Reception 16th Floor SkyTerrace that Definethat the Community Intereach Networking Break Gallery and Siesta Key and Introduction Welcome Aqualea Ballroom AB Speaker: Opening Featured Toolbox Dialogue Dialogue Toolbox Initiative Buffet Complimentary Lunch Belleair Room 4: Workshop Self-Identifying that Skills, and Knowledge, Dispositional Attributes Registration Gallery, 2nd Floor Breakfast Continental Belleair Room 1: Workshop of Pulse the Taking Team of the Science Science with the Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Day 1: Monday, June 12, 2017 June 12, Monday, 1: Day 6:45-8:00 pm 6:00-6:45 pm 5:15-6:00 pm 5:00-5:15 pm 4:30-5:00 pm “Processes and “Processes in Support of Technologies SciTS” Afternoon Workshop Afternoon Workshop Sessions 1:30–4:30 pm 12:00–1:30 pm “Techniques and Training “Techniques and Training SciTS” for Morning Workshop Morning Workshop Sessions 9:00–12:00 pm 8:00 am 8:00 am SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 2 3:00–3:15 pm and Panels (submitted) Thematic Paper Sessions 1:30–3:00 pm 12:00–1:30 pm and Panels (submitted) Thematic Paper Sessions 11:00–12:00 pm 10:45–11:00 am 10:00–10:45 am 9:00–10:00 am 8:55–9:00 am 8:00 am 8:00 am Day 2: Tuesday, June13,2017 Conference At-a-Glance Schedule Gallery and Siesta Key Siesta and Gallery Break Networking Spectrum across the and Recognition Panel: Reward AB Ballroom Aqualea University LunchComplimentary Buffet and FeaturedBell, Suzanne DePaul Speaker: Collaborations Health Research Papers: Key Siesta and Gallery Break Networking AB Ballroom Aqualea SciTS Recognition Award AB Ballroom Aqualea Jakob Zinsstag-Klopfenstein, Swiss Tropical andPublic HealthInstitute Featured Speaker: AB Ballroom Aqualea Welcome &Introduction Room Belleair Continental Breakfast Floor 2nd Gallery, Registration SciTS 2017Conference: Ballroom C Ballroom Sand Key Sand Aqualea Aqualea Multi-Site Postdocs Students and for Graduate Science Training Papers: Team Competencies Team Science — Developing for TeamScience Papers: Training Longboat Key Longboat Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Madeira Team Science Understanding Frameworks for and Theoretical Conceptual Papers: Team Processes Enhancing Evaluating and Papers: Longboat Key Longboat Madeira Government Industry, and across Academia, Collaborations Papers: Success? What Leads to Team Science - to Promote and Institutes Papers: Centers Ballroom C Ballroom Sand Key Sand Aqualea Aqualea Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 3 Madeira Longboat Key Papers: Papers: Translational Health Research Gender Papers: in and Diversity Teams Sand Key Sand Key Emerging Scholars Luncheon Emerging Sand Key Papers: Insights Papers: through Network Analysis New Papers: on Findings to Leads What Madeira Longboat Key Papers: New Papers: Technologies and Evaluation Approaches Papers: International, Large-Scale Distributed Teams Conference Schedule At-a-Glance Conference Aqualea Aqualea Ballroom C Ballroom C Aqualea Ballroom AB Networking Break Gallery and Siesta Key Speaker: Featured Medical Station Space NASA International Vessey, “Brandon” William Center Johnson Space at Project Aqualea Ballroom AB Buffet Complimentary Lunch Belleair Room Registration Gallery, 2nd Floor Breakfast Continental Belleair Room & Introduction Welcome Aqualea Ballroom AB Panel: Featured and Collaboratory Alliance and Arts, Science, Humanities, Papers: Ethics Ethics Papers: and Integrity in Science Team Panel: Seeding Panel: and Watering New Cross- Disciplinary Collaborations Networking Break Gallery and Siesta Key Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Day 3: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 Wednesday, 3: Day 11:30-12:45 pm 10:45 –11:30 am 10:30–10:45 am 9:05–10:30 am 9:00–9:05 am 8:00 am 8:00 am and Panels (submitted) and Panels 5:00–6:00 pm Sessions Paper Thematic 4:45–5:00 pm and Panels (submitted) and Panels 3:15–4:45 pm Sessions Paper Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 4 5:00-5:30 pm and Panels (submitted) Thematic Paper Sessions 3:30-5:00 pm 3:00-3:30 pm and Panels (submitted) Thematic Paper Sessions 1:30–3:00 pm 12:45-1:30 pm Conference At-a-Glance Schedule Aqualea Ballroom AB Ballroom Aqualea Closing Session Research Sites Potential Tool to Identify Analysis asa Network Social After - During, and Panel: Before, Key Siesta and Gallery Break Networking TowerIvory the Panel: Beyond AB Ballroom Aqualea James Olds, National Science Foundation Keynote Speaker: Longboat Key Longboat Key Longboat SciTS 2017Conference: Using Community Panel: Exercises Integration Interdisciplinary Panel: Communities Teams and in Scientific Management Ballroom C Ballroom Ballroom C Ballroom Aqualea Aqualea Aqualea Aqualea Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Approaches Papers: Dialogue Collaborations Innovative to Foster New Approaches Papers: Perspectives Disciplines and acrossBridges to Build Sand Key Sand Madeira Formation and Papers: Team Science for TeamCulture an Institutional Papers: Creating Cohesion Sand Key Sand Madeira Table of Contents

Special Thanks to this Year’s Sponsors! Conference Schedule At-a-Glance 1-4 Sapphire Sponsors Table of Contents 5

Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach Resort & Spa - Conference Locations 6-7

SciTS 2017 Conference Planning Committee and Support 8

Welcome Letter 9-10

Moderators and Recognition Award 11-12 Table of Contents

Featured Speakers 13-16 Platinum Sponsors Detailed Guide to the Conference 18-37

Reviewer Acknowledgment 39 Faculty Cluster Submitted Abstracts 40-84 Initiative

Poster Abstracts 86-101

Gold Sponsors Silver Sponsors

Cognitive Sciences Laboratory

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 5 Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach Resort & Spa - Conference Locations Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach Resort & Spa - Conference Locations

The opening and closing sessions, along with all featured speaker talks, will be held in the Aqualea Ballroom. Concurrent sessions will be held in Aqualea Ballroom C, Sand Key, Longboat Key, and Madeira. The Monday evening poster session will be held in the Poster Gallery followed by the Networking Reception on the 16th Floor Sky Terrace. Conference rooms are indicated on the following maps of the Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach Resort & Spa by the dark gray boxes.

6 SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Hyatt Regency Clearwater Beach Resort & Spa - Conference Locations

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 7 SciTS 2017 Conference Planning Committee and Support

Conference Chair Conference Planning Committee Kevin Wooten, Ph.D. Chair and Professor of Management Stephen M. Fiore, Ph.D. Gabriele Bammer, Ph.D. and Human Resource Management Director, Cognitive Sciences Laboratory Professor, National Centre for University of Houston, Clear Lake Cognitive Sciences, Department of Epidemiology & Population Health and Institute for Simulation Australian National University Conference Event Planner and Training University of Central Florida Heather Billings, Ph.D. Christi Rich Director, Faculty Development Strategic Event Specialist Conference Co-Chair Center for Clinical & Translational Sciences (CCaTS) Kara L. Hall, Ph.D. Mayo Clinic Assistant for Conference Director, Science of Team Administration (University of Science Team Stephen Crowley, Ph.D. Central Florida) Behavioral Research Program Associate Professor Department of Philosophy National Cancer Institute Melisa Grzanich Boise State University Coordinator, Research Program/ Program Chair Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Ph.D. Services Vice President Institute for Simulation & Training Maritza Salazar, Ph.D. Global Academics & University of Central Florida Assistant Professor of Organization and Research Relations Management Elsevier University of California, Irvine Scott Leischow, Ph.D. Program Co-Chair Professor of Health Services Research Office of Health Disparities Research Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, EdD, Ph.D. Mayo Clinic Associate Professor of Clinical Research and Leadership Janet Okamoto, Ph.D. and Pediatrics at The George Research Associate Office of Health Disparities Research Washington University School of Mayo Clinic Medicine and Health Sciences Michael O’Rourke, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy, AgBioResearch Michigan State University

Daniel Stokols, Ph.D. and Committee Planning Research Professor and Chancellor’s Professor Emeritus University of California, Irvine

Julie Thompson Klein, Ph.D. Professor of Humanities Emerita, Faculty Fellow for Interdisciplinary Development in Division of Research Wayne State University

Amanda L. Vogel, Ph.D. Senior Behavioral Scientist National Cancer Institute

8 SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Welcome Letter

On behalf of the SciTS 2017 Conference Planning Committee, welcome to Clearwater Beach, Florida and the Science of Team Science (SciTS)Welcome Letter 2017 Conference!

As with our prior conferences, we continue our efforts in building the foundational knowledge supporting effective team science. Although conferences are well recognized as important venues for knowledge sharing, as a young community, they are particularly important for SciTS. We face the challenge of being both a rapidly growing area of scientific inquiry as well as a field of practice needing immediate guidance and assistance. The conference committee takes this challenge very seriously. As such, we have pursued a two-pronged effort to meet these needs.

First, we open the conference with a set of workshops designed to meet the needs of our diverse stakeholder groups. This includes workshops on training for team science as well as technology for collaboration. We also include workshops on methods for studying science teams as complex networks and a variety of approaches designed to understand and improve communication and collaboration in science teams as well as with stakeholder groups. In this way, we are supporting the science and practice of team science – what we see as an important complementary relationship necessary to advance scientific collaboration.

Second, the committee has assembled an integrated set of speakers and panels along with papers and posters, to share with you the latest conceptual and empirical advances in our understanding of team-based science. Further, our invited speakers were specifically assembled to provide insights and unique perspectives from those experienced in “doing” team science as well as those “studying” team science and collaboration. We additionally broaden the conceptual space of fields involved in scientific collaboration. This includes assembling a panel that consists of experts who have been working in collaborations that draw from the humanities as well as the social and computational sciences. We have also accepted a number of submissions that represent the cutting edge in theoretical, empirical, and practical work in scientific collaborations. And we are very happy to see a healthy combination of new participants to the conference as well as sustained interest by those who continue to do important work for SciTS.

Our Monday evening session will open with our first featured speaker, Dr. Heidi Gardner, from Harvard University. Dr. Gardner will share with us her insights gleaned from years of studying leadership and teamwork in organizations and discuss with us her new book, “Smart Collaboration: How Professionals and Their Firms Succeed by Breaking Down Silos.” We’ll then enjoy a happy hour poster session – our idea here is to have an informal social gathering where we can discuss ideas around the posters while enjoying refreshments with colleagues. We’ll close out the evening with a networking reception. Here we get to enjoy the spectacular view of the beautiful Gulf of Mexico at sunset from the Sky Terrace on the 16th floor of the Hyatt. This venue will be a relaxing environment where we serve up conversation with colleagues along with drinks and hors d’oeuvres.

As with last year, we’ve organized the conference so that mornings feature sessions that give a broad overview of SciTS topics relevant to all attendees, while afternoons allow attendees to focus more deeply on topics of particular interest to them. Highlights include:

• Tuesday morning’s featured speaker is Dr. Jakob Zinsstag-Klopfenstein of the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. Dr. Zinsstag-Klopfenstein is past-president of the International Association for Ecology and Health and president of the scientific board of the Transdisciplinary Network of the Swiss Academies. He is a pioneer in the field of “One Health,” a complex collaborative research effort requiring coordination amongst scientists,

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 9 Welcome Letter

medical practitioners, stakeholders and citizens, in order to improve human and animal health. We’ll then have our SciTS Recognition Award, our annual event acknowledging significant contributions to the field. This year, we’re pleased to recognize the years of passion and dedication of Dr. Kara Hall from the National Cancer Institute. Our lunch on Tuesday will feature the research of Dr. Suzanne Bell, with DePaul University. Dr. Bell is an internationally renowned expert in team composition and building team human capital via the selection, placement, training, and development of team members.

• We open Wednesday with an exciting featured panel on the Letter Welcome “Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory.” Our goal with this panel is to introduce the SciTS community to the important work being done in the cross-disciplinary field of Digital Humanities to establish a framework for collaborative research and education that bridges humanities and technology. This panel features Dr. Bruce Janz and Dr. Scot French, of the University of Central Florida, Dr. Julian Chambliss from Rollins College, and Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, of Wayne State University. Additionally, we have Dr. William “Brandon” Vessey, of the NASA International Space Station Medical Project at Johnson Space Center. Dr. Vessey will discuss his efforts to lead NASA’s research on ground-based spaceflight analog studies as well as his work on teams and leadership focusing on teamwork over long duration space missions. We are also excited to have for our closing keynote address, Dr. James Olds, Assistant Director of the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) with the National Science Foundation, where he is responsible for helping to conceptualize and fund a variety of complex team science initiatives. The international Decade of the Mind project was begun under Dr. Olds leadership, and this helped shape former President Obama’s BRAIN Initiative.

This year’s host organization, the University of Central Florida, has been a pioneer in developing and supporting collaborative research, and they’ve been very pleased to provide guidance and oversight to ensure a successful conference. We hope you will enjoy the community and collaboration we’ve created for this year. We anticipate that the dialogue fostered by this year’s conference—among administrators who influence policies in academia, researchers who engage in team-based research, and scholars who study team science—will enrich the quality of the . After your exciting days with colleagues at the SciTS 2017 Conference, we also hope you have the opportunity to enjoy the spectacular setting of Clearwater Beach, Florida, and enjoy the beauty that is the Gulf of Mexico.

Enjoy the 2017 SciTS Conference!

Stephen M. Fiore, Ph.D. Maritza Salazar, Ph.D. University of Central Florida University of California, Irvine SciTS 2017 Conference Chair SciTS 2017 Program Chair

Kara L. Hall, Ph.D. Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Ed.D.,Ph.D. National Cancer Institute The George Washington University SciTS 2017 Conference Co-Chair SciTS 2017 Program Co-Chair

10 SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Moderators and Recognition Award

Moderators

We would like to extend special thanks to our moderators for facilitating discussion at the SciTS Recognition Award conference: 2017 Recipient: Dr. Kara L. Hall Wayne McCormack To recognize her vision, dedication, and leadership in Shalini Misra helping to establish and continue to advance the Science Julie Thompson Klein NIH of Team Science field. Hannah Love Dr. Kara L. Hall is program Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano director and health scientist Kevin Wooten in the Behavioral Research Deborah DiazGranados Program of the Division of Cancer Control and Lou Woodley Population Sciences at the Amanda L. Vogel National Cancer Institute Pips Veazey (NCI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Teresa Lant She also serves as NCI’s Martiza Salazar Director of the Science of Team Science (SciTS), and Michael O’Rourke Director of NCI’s Theories Initiative. During her career, Dr. Hall has led a variety of interdisciplinary clinical and Suzanne Bell research endeavors. For over a decade now, Dr. Hall has Ryan Watkins been a recognized leader in the development of the Holly Falk-Krzesinski SciTS field. Her contributions to SciTS span a wide range of work, including some of the first empirical studies of Elina Mäkinen transdisciplinary team science and its measurement, as Christine Hendren well as theoretical and conceptual work that helped form Bonnie Spring a strong foundation for the field. She has also produced special journal issues, been a driving force for the annual Stephen Crowley SciTS conference, and contributed to internationally visible Mason Matthews reports on SciTS. Her work is designed to help build an Jennifer Davison evidence base for effective team science approaches and Bruce Janz support the translation and dissemination of emerging knowledge and best practices into practical tools and Bethany Laursen resources. As recognition of her accomplishments, she was nominated to serve as a member of The National

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 11 Moderators and Recognition Award

Academies Committee on the Science of Team Science (2012-2015). As a study committee member, she helped co-author the resulting study report, Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science. As evidence of the importance of the topic, this document was the third most downloaded National Academies Press report in 2015. In addition to her stewardship of the Science of Team Science, Dr. Hall has focused on advancing dissemination and implementation research and promoting the use, testing, and development of health behavior theory in cancer control research. Dr. Hall champions areas including systems science approaches and teams/groups in health and healthcare. Prior to arriving at NCI, Dr. Hall’s program of research included the development of behavioral science methodologies such as the design of survey protocols, meta-analytic techniques for health behavior theory testing, as well as on applications of health behavior theory to multiple content areas and the development of computerized tailored interventions to foster health promotion and disease prevention behaviors. Dr. Hall earned her

Masters and Doctoral degrees at the University CampusNIH Main and of Rhode Island in Psychology with specializations in clinical psychology, neuropsychology, and behavioral science.

12 SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Featured Speakers

James Olds,Ph.D., Closing Keynote Speaker Assistant Director of the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA

Our keynote for this year’s conference will be Dr. James Olds, Assistant Director of the Directorate for Biological Sciences (BIO) with the National Science Foundation. In this position, Dr. Olds is responsible for helping to conceptualize and fund a variety of complex team science initiatives. Dr. Olds is also director and chief academic unit officer at the Krasnow Institute for Advanced Study at George Mason University, a position he has held for 15 years. He is also the Shelley Krasnow University Professor of Molecular Neuroscience. The international Decade of the Mind project was begun under his leadership at Krasnow, a project that helped shape former President Obama’s BRAIN Initiative.

Heidi K. Gardner, Ph.D. Distinguished Fellow in the Center on the Legal Profession Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA

Dr. Heidi K. Gardner, is a Distinguished Fellow in the Center on the Legal Profession at Harvard Law School. She also serves as a Lecturer on Law and the Faculty Chair of the school’s Accelerated Leadership Program executive course. Dr. Gardner’s research focuses on leadership and collaboration and her book, Smart Collaboration: How Professionals and Their Firms Succeed by Breaking Down Silos was just published by Harvard Business Press in January 2017 (http://amzn.to/2n8zEvS). Her research has also been published in the Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, and Harvard Business Review and her work was awarded the Academy of Management’s prize for Outstanding Practical Paper with Implications for Management. She has degrees in from the London Business School, and she has been a Fulbright Scholar and an International Research Fellow at Oxford University.

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 13 Featured Speakers

Jakob Zinsstag-Klopfenstein, Ph.D. Deputy Head of the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (TPH), Basel, Switzerland

Dr. Jakob Zinsstag-Klopfenstein is a veterinarian in tropical animal health. He is past-president of the International Association for Ecology and Health and president of the scientific board of the Transdisciplinary Network of the Swiss Academies. Since 1998 he has headed a research group on human and animal health at the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute. Since 2011 he has also been deputy head of department of Epidemiology and Public Health at Swiss TPH. He focuses on the control of zoonoses in developing countries and the provision of health care to mobile pastoralists. He has helped to develop the “One Health” approach to research and practice and is co-editor of the book One Health: The Theory and Practice of Integrated Health Approaches (http://amzn.to/2ly0lOe). One Health is complex collaborative research effort requiring coordination amongst scientists, medical practitioners, stakeholders and citizens, in order to improve human and animal health.

Dr. Suzanne Bell, Ph.D. Associate Professor, Industrial & Organizational Psychology DePaul University, Chicago, IL

Dr. Bell is faculty with the Industrial & Organizational Psychology program at DePaul University.Featured Speakers Dr. Bell is an internationally renowned expert in team composition and building team human capital via the selection, placement, training, and development of team members. She has published on a variety of topics including conducting actionable research on extreme teams, composing cohesive teams, as well as the relationship between personality and cognition and coordination in teams.

William “Brandon” Vessey, Ph.D. Deputy Element Scientist for Flight Analogs with NASA’s ISS Medical Project Johnson Space Center, Houston TX

Dr. William “Brandon” Vessey is currently the Deputy Element Scientist for Flight Analogs with NASA’s ISS Medical Project at the Johnson Space Center, providing scientific oversight for ground-based spaceflight analog studies. His primary research interests fall into the broad categories of teams, leadership, and creativity, with specific focus on teamwork over long duration space missions, team leadership, and collective leadership. He is co-editor of a recent scholarly volume, Team Cohesion: Advances in Psychological Theory, Methods and Practice, that discusses cutting edge developments in research on the attitudinal factors in teams driving successful performance (http://bit.ly/2mvnTCu).

14 SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Featured Panel

Panel: Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory Panelists: Bruce Janz, Chair, University of Central Florida; Julie T Klein, Wayne State University; Scot French, University of Central Florida; Julian Chambliss, Rollins College

Bruce Janz, Ph.D. Professor of Humanities in the Department of Philosophy University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL

Bruce Janz is a Professor of Humanities in the Department of Philosophy, core faculty member of the Texts and Technology Ph.D. Program, and co-director of the Center for Humanities and Digital Research at the University of Central Florida in Orlando Florida. His Ph.D. is in Philosophy from the University of Waterloo. He has taught in Canada, the US, Kenya and South Africa. He is author of Philosophy in an African Place, co-author of A Neurophenomenology of Awe and Wonder: Toward a Non- Reductionist Cognitive Science, and editor of Place, Space and Hermeneutics, as well as many articles and chapters on contemporary African philosophy, space and place, contemporary European philosophy, digital humanities, and . He is the chair of the organizing committee for HASTAC 17, the annual conference for the Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory, to be held in Orlando in November 2017.

Julie Thompson Klein, Ph.D. Professor of Humanities Emerita in the English Department Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

Julie Thompson Klein is Professor of Humanities Emerita in the English Department at Wayne State University and an Affiliate of the TdLab at the ETH- Zurich university for science and technology. Her authored and co/edited books Featured Speakers Featured include Interdisciplinarity (l990), Crossing Boundaries (1996), Transdisciplinarity (2001), Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity (2005), Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures (2010), and Interdisciplining Digital Humanities (2015). She is past president of the Association of Interdisciplinary Studies, Associate Editor of The Oxford Handbook on Interdisciplinarity (2010, 2017), and co-editor of the University of Michigan Press series Digital Humanities@digitalculturebooks. She has served on numerous national task forces on interdisciplinarity and is on boards of the Science of Team Science network and HASTAC. Klein has also been Visiting Foreign Professor in Japan, Fulbright professor in Nepal, Foundation Visitor at the University of Auckland, Mellon Fellow in Digital Humanities at the University of Michigan, and Distinguished Women’s Scholar at the University of Victoria.

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 15 Featured Panel

Scot French, Ph.D. Professor and Chair of the Department of and Coordinator of the Africa and African-American Studies Program University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL

Scot French is an Associate Professor of Digital History, Director of Public History, and a core faculty member of the Texts and Technology Ph.D. program at the University of Central Florida. He is the former director of the Virginia Center for Digital History (2006-2010) and the founding chair of the Florida Digital Humanities Consortium (2015-present), a collective of twelve institutions in the State of Florida that seeks to promote an understanding of the humanities in light of digital technologies and research. (FLDH is hosting the HASTAC17 conference and a companion workshop, “Information Analysis: The Role of Visualization Tools and Cloud Storage Platforms in Collaborative Research and Teaching,” to be held in Orlando this Fall.) As digital editor of the Florida Historical Quarterly, French directed a broadly collaborative, multi-institutional research project, “Visual Historiography: Visualizing ‘The Literature of a Field,” and co-authored an e-poster, with Ohio State historian David Staley and U.Va. visualization specialist Bill Ferster, that appeared in the Journal of Digital Humanities (Spring 2014). French is the author of The Rebellious Slave: Nat Turner in American Memory (Houghton Mifflin, 2004) and numerous essays on the legacy of race and slavery in American memory.

Julian C. Chambliss, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Digital History, Director of Public History Rollins College, Winter Park, FL

Julian C. Chambliss is Professor and Chair of the Department of History and Coordinator of the Africa and African-American Studies Program at Rollins College in Winter Park, Florida. His research and teaching interests focus on urban culture and development in the United States. His articles have appeared

in journals such as Rhetoric Review, Speakers Featured Florida Historical Quarterly and Studies in American. An interdisciplinary scholar he has designed museum exhibitions, curated art shows and created public digital history projects that trace community, identity, and power in the American South. He is co-recipient of an Associated Colleges of the South (ACS) & Research 1 University Mellon Foundation Collaborative Project grant to explore the creation of digital collaborative ventures to enhance undergraduate engagement with diaspora topics and texts. He is co-recipient of an ACS Mellon Foundation Faculty Renewal Grant for Project Mosaic: Zora Neale Hurston -- A Multidisciplinary Exploration of African-American Culture, a digital project exploring African- American experience. Dr. Chambliss also has an ACS Faculty Advancement Grant on the topic of Urban Dreams and Urban Disruptions: Transforming Travel Study and Undergraduate Archival Research with Collaborative Interdisciplinary Digital Tools. He is co-editor and contributor for Ages of Heroes, Eras of Men: Superheroes and the American Experience, a collection examining the relationship between superheroes and the American Experience (2013). His forthcoming edited collection, Assemble!: Essays on the Modern Marvel Cinematic Universe will be published in 2017. A public intellectual he has published opinion and commentary in popular forums such as the Los Angeles Times, The Orlando Sentinel, The Christian Science Monitor, and National Public Radio (NPR).

16 SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 17 Day 1: Monday, June 12 18 requests of stakeholders.outcome-independent personal, dynamic, techniques to data-driven build consensus, encourage excellence inteammates, andmake This workshop isdevisedto helptrain future and improvisation leadersto utilize performance tools to develop Arizona State University Visiting Assistant Professor, Performing Arts Boyd Branch, M.F.A. Workshop 2:I dialogue. will utilize aninstrument tailored to create directly to allow basedoninterdisciplinary participants knowledge of team science. Following anintroduction to the theworkshopTDI methodanditsuseintheSciTScommunity conference, ofthescience community-wide SciTS reflection onaspects by the community TDI isaimingto support approach to enhancingcommunication andcollaboration within teams andcommunities. For thisyear’s SciTS The Toolbox formerly the DialogueInitiative (TDI, “Toolbox isaphilosophically-grounded, Project”) dialogue-based StateMichigan University ofPhilosophy Department AgBioResearch Stephanie E. Vasko, Ph.D. (TDI) Workshop 1: 9:00–12:00 pm Continental Breakfast 8:00 am Registration 8:00 am Longboat Key Key Sand Room Belleair Gallery, 2ndFloor Monday, June12,2017

Taking thePulse oftheScience of Team Science (SciTS)withthe Toolbox DialogueInitiative mprovisation for Leadership Communication andCritical withsideCoach

Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2017Conference:

Boise StateBoise University ofPhilosophy Department Associate Professor Stephen Crowley, Ph.D. Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

Day 1: Monday, June 12 19

, Ph.D.

Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Ed.D, Ph.D. Ed.D, Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Professor Associate and Pediatrics and Leadership Clinical Research University Washington George Kevin Wooten of Management Chair and Professor Faculty of Business College of Houston University Ph.D. Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J. Relations & Research Global Academics Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for , Ph.D. Vice President Vice Self-Identifying the Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositional Attributes the Define the Intereach the Define the Skills, and Dispositional Attributes Self-IdentifyingIntereach the Knowledge, Enhancing Team Science Effectiveness through Team Training Team Science Team Enhancing Effectiveness through , Ph.D. Sand Key Belleair Room Aqualea Ballroom AB Ballroom Aqualea SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Duke University University Northwestern Implications of the Environmental for Center Elsevier, NanoTechnology Christine Ogilvie Hendren, Ph.D. Christine Hendren, Ogilvie Director, Executive Community 1:30-4:30 pm 4: Workshop 12:00-1:30 pm Buffet Complimentary Lunch implementation of successful team training programs training team of successful implementation has been identified as a critical means to enhance performance. Drawing on decades of research on team training, team training, on research on decades of performance. Drawing to enhance a critical as means has been identified participants and will present development, with evidence-basedthis workshop the design, to approaches Although interdisciplinary scientific collaboration has many success stories, evidence suggests that, in many in many suggests that, evidence stories, success has many collaboration interdisciplinary Although scientific the ability of improve To knowledge. integrating the goal of successfully achieve do not always teams cases, team training and teamwork effective problems, complex solutions to novel generate to interdisciplinary teams Pace University Pace Theresa Lant Theresa Professor Arts and Entertainment Management Program Director, Assistant Professor Assistant University Commonwealth Virginia University of California, Irvine of California, University DiazGranados Deborah Assistant Professor of Organization and Management of Organization Professor Assistant Merage School of Business Paul The Maritza Salazar, Ph.D. Maritza Salazar, Workshop 3: 3: Workshop Day 1: Monday, June 12 20 used to develop recommender systems for assemblingeffective scientific teams. understand andenableteam science. The sessionconcludes withademonstration ofhow theseinsights are being models ofteam science. Research exemplars are presented to illustrate thepotential oftheMTML framework to in scientific communities. The session willprovide ahighlevel ofstatistical techniques overview to test MTML understand thedynamicsfor creating, maintaining, dissolving, andreconstituting networks socialandknowledge and enableteam science. Here, amulti-theoretical multilevel (MTML) modelisoutlined to help stakeholders group, andcomponent level. (3) oftheworkshop addressesThe modelsto third usingnetwork understand part howdescribes are variouscommon metrics network computed andinterpreted at theactor, dyadic, triadic, sub- various how theseconcepts influence strategies data. ofnetwork for the collection The sessionthendefinesand and attributes ofactors, relations ofrelations itdescribes networks. andproperties aswell Next astwo-mode to teammetrics describe science. begins by defining Thisvarious concepts analysis: part usedinnetwork actors cognitive andtheirrelevance networks knowledge to team science. (2) focuses The onusingnetwork second part introduction towith abrief theconcepts ofsocialnetworks, cognitive networks, socialnetworks, knowledge ofthemotivationsoverview to viewteam science from perspective. asocialnetworks will conclude This firstpart collaborations. This workshop isorganized (1) into parts. three provides distinct The anhistorical firstpart will come away withanimproved for understandingofthe various forms effective necessary ofnetworks scientific thisworkshop,In attendees willbeintroduced to theories, thebasicsofsocialnetwork methods, andtools. They Northwestern University Professor ofBehavioral Science Noshir Contractor, Ph.D. Workshop 5: disciplines to helpfacilitate, optimize, andtranslate research outcomes. address complex problems andeffectivelyknowledge between engagediverse basesand work attheinterfaces optimize thesuccess scientific endeavors. ofinterdisciplinary We will cover needed to thenew of expertise forms shared needfor ofroles newtypes to bedefined, recognized, andtrained inorder institutionallysupported to Integration(Interdisciplinary Research Careers Hub). The Intereach hasevolved community around a broadly This workshop addresses anewbutgrowing andresearch: ofpractice community SciTS-generated Intereach Australian Population Professor, National Centre for Epidemiology& National Gabriele Health University Bammer, Ph.D. Longboat Key Network PerspectivesNetwork to UnderstandandEnable Team Science

Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference

SciTS 2017Conference:

Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

Day 1: Monday, June 12 21

Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide MLIS Potterbusch, Megan Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Collaborative Technologies: Facilitating How We Conduct Research Together Conduct Research We How Facilitating Technologies: Collaborative Gallery and Siesta Key Aqualea Ballroom AB Ballroom Aqualea Aqualea Ballroom AB Ballroom Aqualea Gallery and Siesta Key Aqualea Ballroom C Ballroom Aqualea SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: 6:00-6:45pm Hour Session and Happy Poster Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA Cambridge, Harvard School, Law Heidi K. Gardner, Ph.D. Heidi K. Gardner, Profession on the Legal in the Center Distinguished Fellow Opening Featured Speaker Opening Featured 5:15-6:00 pm Welcome and Introduction Welcome 5:00-5:15 pm 4:30-5:00 pm Networking Break varied features of these technologies that support that of these technologies science. team varied features Whether you are working in the same building, or collaborating with researchers around the world, today’s today’s the world, around with researchers or collaborating working are in the same building, you Whether use the to effectively review how we workshop In this technologies. numerous can benefit from teams research National Academy of Sciences Academy National science. team collaborative facilitate used to discuss the wide variety is devised to of technologies workshop This Anne MarinoAnne Director Senior Program Framework Resident Science Stewardship Open Digital University Leadership National Washington Professor Educational George Ryan Watkins, Ryan Watkins, Ph.D. Workshop 6: 6: Workshop Day 1: Monday, June 12 22 Horsd’oeuvres Reception withHeavy Networking 6:45-8:00 pm 16th Floor Sky Terrace Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2017Conference: Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 23 Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 Cognitive ofPhilosophy Sciences, and Department Director, Cognitive Sciences Laboratory Stephen M.Fiore, Ph.D. Welcome andIntroduction 8:55–9:00 am Continental Breakfast 8:00 am Registration 8:00 am Networking Break Networking 10:45-11:00 am SciTS Recognition Award 10:00-10:45 am Featured Speaker: 9:00–10:00 am University ofCentral Florida forInstitute Simulation and Training 24 Swiss Tropical andPublic HealthInstitute ofEpidemiologyandPublic Health HeadoftheDepartment Deputy Jakob Zinsstag-Klopfenstein, Ph.D. Aqualea BallroomAB Room Belleair Gallery, 2ndFloor Gallery andSiestaKey Gallery Aqualea Ballroom AB Aqualea Ballroom AB Tuesday, June13,2017

Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference

SciTS 2017Conference:

National Cancer Institute Behavioral Research Program Science Team Director, Science of Team L.Hall, Ph.D.Kara Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 25 Paper 2: Differing views on interdisciplinarity in the on interdisciplinarity views 2: Differing Paper human and social sciences and Daniel Frandji KristineAuthors: Lund Paper 3: Training Future Team Scientists: Reflections Team Future Training 3: Paper Course Translational from Judy Chao, Mark Huda Sarraj, Hellmich, Celia Authors: Allan and Wooten Kevin Christina Cestone, Aronson, Brasier Authors: Sarah Greene Sarah Authors: Science Team Assess to 3: Network Analytics Paper RadhakrishnanAuthors: Nagarajan Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Madeira Longboat Key Longboat Sand Key SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Authors: Authors: Kevin Wooten Paper 1: The Use of Paradox to Study, Understand, and Understand, Study, to of Paradox Use The 1: Paper Teams Develop Scientific Moderator: Julie Thompson KleinThompson Julie Moderator: Thematic Paper Session: Conceptual And Theoretical Frameworks For Understanding Team Science Team Understanding For Frameworks Theoretical And Session: Conceptual Paper Thematic Authors: Wayne T. McCormack T. Wayne Authors: Paper 2: If We Expect Future Scientists To Work in Teams, Teams, in Work To Scientists Expect Future We 2: If Paper for Training Team They Should in Teams: Be Trained Students Ph.D. Translational Clinical & Moody, Lindsey Realmuto, Laura Sheble and Linda Laura Lindsey Realmuto, Moody, Weiss Program on Interdisciplinary Science Program James Sheaba Daniel, Christine Bachrach, Authors: Moderator: Shalini MisraModerator: Postdoctoral of an 1: Effects Interdisciplinary Paper Thematic Paper Session: Team Science Training For Graduate Students And Postdocs And Students Graduate For Training Science Team Session: Paper Thematic Paper 2: A 23-year Experiment in Sustainable Team Team in Sustainable Experiment 2: A 23-year Paper Network Research Systems Health Care The Science: Authors: Christina Park, Catherine Monk, Patrick- Catherine Christina Park, Bray Authors: Lake and Matthew Gillman Moderator: Wayne McCormack Wayne Moderator: promote to science 1: Implementing team Paper ECHO Program NIH’s in transdisciplinary research Thematic Paper Sessions and Panels (submitted) Sessions Panels and Paper Thematic Collaborations Session: Health Research Multi-Site Paper Thematic 11:00-12:00 pm 11:00-12:00 Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 Authors: JackSchultz interdisciplinarity inacademia Paper 2: Team science failure: theproblem of Alina Lungeanu and Yulia Tyshchuk Authors: Griffin Weber, Noshir Contractor, Gopal, Shuba by establishinginstitutes to promote team science? Paper 1:Can cross-university collaboration befacilitated Moderator: HannahLove Thematic Paper Centers Session: And Institutes To Promote Team Science- What Leads To Success? 26 Authors: R.Lotrecchiano, Gaetano HollyJ. Falk-Krzesinksi O’Rourke andMichael R.LotrecchianoModerator: Gaetano Stakeholders intheProfessions andLearning Panel: Reward andRecognition Across Attending theSpectrum: to Collaboration theNeedsofMultiple Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 1:30-3:00 pm DePaul University, Chicago, IL Associate Professor, &Organizational Psychology Industrial Dr. SuzanneBell LunchComplimentary Buffet with Featured Speaker 12:00-1:30 Authors: Bethany Laursen reasoning? team ofinterdisciplinary science The heart Paper 3: What iscollaborative, interdisciplinary Aqualea Ballroom C Aqualea Ballroom C Aqualea Ballroom AB pm , Ph.D.

Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2017Conference: Authors: Stephen Beck engineering. research team humanities, across sciences thearts, and Paper 3:Cultural Computing: buildingacollaborative Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 27 Paper 4: 21st Century Techniques for Achieving Achieving for Techniques 4: 21st Century Paper the Hidden Despite Curriculum Collaboration Authors: Wade Derek & Idea a good point”: Collaboration “That’s 5: Paper Datathons at Development Weber M. Kristensen and Matthew Teis Authors: Paper 3: The Role(s) of Personal Skills in Development Role(s) of Personal The 3: Paper Plan a Collaboration Developing Authors: Vasko Stephanie Learning Online Coalesce of the 4: Effectiveness Paper ModulesScience Training Team for Katya H. Gene McFadden, Bonnie Spring, Authors: Donald Hedeker, Vernon, Rak, Philip Klyachko, Frank Pfammatter Juned Siddique and Angela Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Sand Key Longboat Key Longboat Madeira Moderator: Moderator: Woodley Lou Thematic Paper Session: Collaborations Across Academia, Industry, And Government And Industry, Academia, Across Session: Collaborations Paper Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Paper 3: What makes a team?: An Evaluation of an Evaluation An makes a team?: What 3: Paper Teams Development Interdisciplinary Team Program and Hannah Love Cross Jennifer Authors: Authors: Hannah Love and Jeni Cross Hannah Love Authors: Paper 2: Connecting Research Methods and Successful Methods 2: Connecting and Successful Research Paper Teams Authors: Marissa Shuffler, William Kramer, Michelle WilliamKramer, Marissa Shuffler, Authors: and Joshua Summers ApurvaFlynn, Patel Paper 1: Profile Analytics as a Mechanism for Analytics as a Mechanism 1: Profile Paper Teams Design Understanding Engineering Moderator: Deborah DiazGranados Deborah Moderator: Thematic Paper Session: Evaluating And Enhancing Team Processes Team Enhancing And Session: Evaluating Paper Thematic Authors: Anna Malavisi, Marisa Malavisi, Anna RinkusAuthors: and Michael O’Rourke Paper 2: Reflecting on Global Development: A Toolbox Toolbox 2: Reflecting A on Global Development: Paper for Teams Development Factors Katherine and KatherineAuthors: Campbell Stackpoole Paper 1: The Impact of Team Skills Training on the Training Skills Team ImpactThe of 1: Paper Readiness of Intrapersonal Collaboration Expression Moderator: Moderator: Kevin Wooten Thematic Paper Session: Training For Team Science - Developing Team Science Competencies Science Team Developing Science - Team For Training Session: Paper Thematic Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 28 Petersen Brown, Salim Virani, R Charlene Weir andLaura A. Michael Authors: Jennifer W Smith,Charnetta H.Garvin, Support Treatment Failure ofHeart in VA Care Primary DesignInform ofHealthInformation Technology to Paper 1:Use of Theoretic Frameworks to andModels Pips VeazeyModerator: Thematic Paper New Session: Technologies And Evaluation Approaches Amanda VogelModerator: Authors: Amanda Vogel, Hall, Anne Kara Heberger Marino, SuzanneChristen andDamayanthi Ranwala Panel: and Seeding Watering Collaborations: NewCross-Disciplinary Approaches from Funders andUniversities Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 3:15-4:45 pm Break Networking 3:00-3:15 pm Zouwen, Wim van Vierssen andPeter Van Besselaar Den Authors: Bei Wen, Edwin van Horlings, der Marielle Association Device asaHeuristic Analysis ofanInternational ProfessionalExploratory Organizations inCreating Collaboration Networks: Paper 2: The ofIntermediate Role Network Authors: David JMcbee Research andDevelopment intheContextBoundaries ofBiopharmaceutical Paper 1:Communicating Across Organizational Madeira Madeira Aqualea Ballroom C andSiestaKey Gallery Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2017Conference: Authors: Amber Caulkins Lessons from Developing Network aKnowledge Paper 4:EstablishingaStatewide Research Initiative: Zouwen, Edwin andPeter Horlings Van Besselaar Den Authors: Bei Wen, Wim van Vierssen, van der Marielle collaboration Paper 3:Motivations behindcross-boundary Authors: Laura Anderson and Cheryl Kieliszewski Authors: Laura Anderson andCheryl Scientific Teams Paper 2: The Use ofDigital Trace Data to Examine Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 29 Authors: Felichism Kabo Mashour and George Felichism Authors: Social between Networks, Associations The 4: Paper Among and Co-Location Sense of Community, Scientists Policy Healthcare Kabo Felichism Authors: Paige Sean Cleary, Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Authors: and Shalini Misra,L McDonald, Julia Storberg-Walker Ryan Watkins A Science: Team Ultimate The Science- 3: Citizen Paper in Biomedical Research Participation Public at Look Authors: Katrina Theisz Paper 3: The Effect of a Clinical and Translational Translational of a Clinical and Effect The 3: Paper Networks Institute of on the Ego Science Award University Research a Large at Investigators Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Poster GalleryPoster Longboat Key Longboat Sand Key SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Networking Break 4:45-5:00 pm Think Tanks and Aims Tanks Think Paper 2: Creating a Culture of Collaboration at George George at of Collaboration a Culture 2: Creating Paper Seminar University (C3@GWU): University Washington Academic Medical Centers Academic Rand Haley Authors: Moderator: MartizaModerator: Salazar Priority at Research Science as a Strategic Team 1: Paper Thematic Paper Session: Translational Health Research Translational Session: Paper Thematic Authors: Heisawn Jeong, Kristine Lund, Sebastian Kristine Lund, Jeong, Heisawn Authors: Jensen and Pablo Grauwin Paper 2: Comparing Bibliographic Maps with Bibliographic 2: Comparing Paper Research Networks in Educational Researcher Authors: Daniel Acuna and Elizabeth Novoa Daniel Acuna Authors: Moderator: Teresa Lant Teresa Moderator: connectivity big 1: Author within disciplines: how Paper world? is your Thematic Paper Session: Insights Through Network Analysis Through Session: Insights Paper Thematic Alexandra Rosenberg, Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Lisa Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J. Rosenberg, Alexandra Schwartz Liu and John Collaboration (MATRICx) Collaboration Mallinson, Trudy Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Authors: Paper 3: A Self-Scoring 3: A the Motivation Mechanism for Paper and Integration, Readiness, Team for Assessment Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 30 Authors: Jeff Tsao and Narayanamurti Venkatesh Delicate Balance between Freedom and Focus Paper 2:Research versus Development Teams: The Authors: Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang andJamesEvans and TechnologyScience Paper 1:Small Teams Generate in NewDirections WatkinsRyan Moderator: Thematic Paper NewFindings Session: On What Leads To Innovation TeamsMakes Productive? Organization: What Research International Virtual Paper Ecology of 2:ADynamic Teams inan Authors: Lucia Scodanibbio trenches research:interdisciplinary lessonsfrom early the Paper 1:Collaborative, multi-geography Moderator: SuzanneBell Thematic Paper Distributed International, Session: Large-Scale Teams Fletcher andStephen Zaccaro Authors: Samantha Dubrow, Laura Richard Klimoski, Science Multiteam Systems Paper Promoting 2:Holdingitalltogether: in Integrity Authors: Jonathan Hannah Beever andMark Paper 1:Ethical Foundations in Team ScienceSettings O’Rourke Moderator: Michael Thematic Paper In Ethics And Session: Integrity Team Science Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 5:00-6:00 pm Sand Key Sand Longboat Key Aqualea Ballroom C Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2017Conference: Authors: John Walsh, You-Na Lee andLi Tang PaperMisconduct 3:DivisionofLaborandScientific Authors: Jones Ahmadpoor andBenjamin Mohammad Prior Scientific Advance Paper 3: The Frontier: Dual Patentable Inventions and Caroline, Saint-Amand Annick and Turcotte Daniel Authors: Robitaille Saint-Jacques Marie-Christine, through three keymoments initsdevelopment to thesuccess inCanada ofaresearch partnership Paper 3:Examination ofprocesses that contributed Scott Poole andMarshall Simpson, Natalie Lambert Ahmed, Ashley Authors: Iftekhar Trudeau, Elizabeth Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 31 Paper 3: of grant membership of 3: Social grant of network analysis Paper gender and network centralities researchers: university Eriko Fukumoto Authors: Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Madeira SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: gender and co-authorship men and women between Côté Grégoire Authors: Paper 2: Collaboration between men and women in men and women between 2: Collaboration Paper activity of scientific a bibliometric analysis science: by Review of Quantitative Research Review of Quantitative Balakrishnanand Asha Pena Vanessa Authors: Paper 1: The Role in the Scientific of Diversity and The 1: Paper and its Impact A on Innovation: Workforce Engineering Moderator: Holly Falk-Krzesinski Moderator: Thematic Paper Session: Gender And Diversity In Teams Session: Gender In Diversity And Paper Thematic Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 32 Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2017Conference: Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 33

, Ph.D.

, Ph.D.

Kara Ph.D. L. Hall, Team of Science Director, Science Team Program Research Behavioral Institute Cancer National Rollins College Scot French and Chair of the Department of HistoryProfessor and Studies and African-American of the Africa Coordinator Program Florida of Central University Julian Chambliss History of Digital Professor Associate History of Public Director Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

, Ph.D. , Ph.D.

Wednesday, June 14, 2017 June Wednesday, Gallery and Siesta Key Aqualea Ballroom AB Ballroom Aqualea Aqualea Ballroom AB Ballroom Aqualea Belleair Room Gallery, 2nd Floor Gallery, SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Institute for Simulation and Training and Simulation Institute for Florida of Central University Stephen M. Fiore, Ph.D. M. Fiore, Stephen Laboratory Sciences Cognitive Director, Department and Sciences, of Philosophy Cognitive English Department University State Wayne Julie T Klein of Humanities Emerita Professor Department of Philosophy Florida of Central University Bruce Janz Bruce of Humanities Professor Networking Break 10:30-10:45 am Featured Panel: Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Alliance and Collaboratory Alliance Technology and Arts, Science, Humanities, Panel: Featured 9:05-10:30 am 9:00 - 9:05 am and Introduction Welcome 8:00 am Breakfast Continental 8:00 am Registration Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 34 Keep, Benjamin Muñoz-Najar GalvezAuthors: andSebastian Gomez Charles ElinaMäkinen, Moderator: ElinaMäkinen Panel: Beyond The Ivory Tower: Production Knowledge Academic Between And Non-Academic Science Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 1:30 -3:00pm National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA Assistant Director oftheDirectorate for Biological Sciences(BIO) Dr. JamesOlds Keynote Speaker: 12:45-1:30 am Virginia TechUniversity Assistant Professor Ph.D.Shanlini Misra, Emerging Luncheon Scholars 11:30-12:45 LunchComplimentary Buffet 11:30-12:45 NASA International Space Station Project Medical at JohnsonSpace Center Element for Scientist Deputy Flight Analogs withNASA’s Project ISSMedical WilliamVessey “Brandon” Featured Speaker: 10:45-11:30 am Longboat Key Aqualea Ballroom AB Key Sand Room Belleair Aqualea Ballroom AB pm pm

, Ph.D. Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference

SciTS 2017Conference: Virginia Commonwealth University Assistant Professor Deborah DiazGranados Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

, Ph.D.

Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 35 Paper 4: Fundamental Challenges to Transdisciplinary Transdisciplinary Challenges to 4: Fundamental Paper in HigherResearch Education Valerie Imbruce Authors: Paper 4: Professional Development for Team Science: Science: Team for Development 4: Professional Paper Teaming Effective for Training and Ellen Fisher Meghan Suter Authors: and Tenure in the Science Team 3: Recognizing Paper for Tool a Common Developing Process: Promotion Achievement Faculty Evaluating Kennelly Okraku and Christopher Therese Authors: McCarty Paper 3: MCubed: Token-Based Seed Funding Seed Funding Token-Based 3: MCubed: Paper Teams of Interdisciplinary Formation Distribution for Johnson Valerie Mark BurnsAuthors: and Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Sand Key Madeira Aqualea Ballroom C Ballroom Aqualea SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Case Study of Team Science in the Physical Sciences Science in the Physical Team of Study Case Robin Hayes Authors: Potterbusch A Centers: Research Frontier 2: US DOE Energy Paper Science Framework (OSF) Science Framework and Megan Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano Authors: Paper 1: Creating a Culture of Collaboration at George George at of Collaboration a Culture 1: Creating Paper Utilizing the Open (C3@GWU) University Washington Moderator: Stephen Crowley Stephen Moderator: Thematic Paper Session: Creating An Institutional Culture For Team Science Team For Institutional An Culture Session: Creating Paper Thematic Lungeanu and Yulia Tyshchuk Lungeanu and Yulia funded teams through each phase of a research grant grant of a research each phase through funded teams competition Alina Contractor, Noshir Weber, Griffin Authors: Paper 2: A framework for analyzing funded and non- for 2: A framework Paper station’s SEEDS competitive grant program grant SEEDS competitive station’s Smith and Graham Keith Julie Aldridge, Authors: Cochran Paper 1: Team science in agriculture: Perspectives Perspectives in agriculture: science Team 1: Paper experiment agricultural University on the Ohio State Moderator: BonnieModerator: Spring Thematic Paper Session: Approaches To Foster New Innovative Collaborations New Innovative Foster To Session: Approaches Paper Thematic Moderator: ChristineModerator: Hendren Caulkins and Amber Veazey Jack Schultz, Pips Christine Hendren, Authors: Panel: Interdisciplinary Integration Exercises: Practitioners share meeting design, facilitation methods, successes successes methods, facilitation design, meeting share Practitioners Exercises: Interdisciplinary Integration Panel: and failures Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 36 Desch Authors: Burnam-Fink, C.J. Michael Huffand Steve atKnowledge theNExSS Winter School Paper Attitudes 2:Development and ofInterdisciplinary Vasko andStephanie Robinson Brian Rinkus, Marisa O’Rourke, Hall, Kara Gonnerman, Troy Hall, Anna Malavisi, Michael Authors: Graham Hubbs, Stephen Crowley, Chad dialogue transfer incross-disciplinary Paper 1:Ontheinteraction ofaffectandinformation Moderator: Bruce Janz Thematic Paper DialogueApproaches Session: To Across BuildBridges DisciplinesAnd Perspectives Authors: Jennifer Davison, Andreas Leidolf, Lou Woodley, Elisha Wood-Charlson Sandstrom andMalin Moderator: Jennifer Davison Collaboration Panel: Community inScientific Management Teams and Communities: An Emerging Discipline to Effect Authors: Mathews, Mason Wendy-Lin andChristopher McCarty Bartels Matthews Moderator: Mason Partners andto Monitor&Evaluate Interdisciplinary Team ScienceCollaboration over Time Panel: Before, During, Analysis andAfter –Using Network Social asa Tool to Identify Potential Research Sites & Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 3:30 -5:00pm Break Networking 3:00-3:30 pm Sand Key Sand Aqualea Ballroom C Longboat Key andSiestaKey Gallery Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2017Conference: Authors: Chitvan Trivedi andShaliniMisra Entrepreneurial Ventures Paper 4: The Integral Place ofDialogueinSocial and Authors: Salazar Maritza Theresa Lant Science Participants Paper 3:EnhancingIntegrative among Capability Team Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 37

Paper 3: Applying Lessons from Intentional Living Living Intentional from Lessons 3: Applying Paper Science Team to Communities and Rachael Baker Wilstermann Amy Authors: Kara Ph.D. L. Hall, Team of Science Director, Science Team Program Research Behavioral Institute Cancer National Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Aqualea Ballroom AB Ballroom Aqualea Madeira SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Resource Management Resource Clear Lake of Houston, University Kevin Wooten, Ph.D. Kevin Wooten, of Management and Human Chair and Professor Cognitive Sciences, Department and Sciences, of Philosophy Cognitive Training and Simulation Institute for Florida of Central University Stephen M. Fiore, Ph.D. M. Fiore, Stephen Laboratory Sciences Cognitive Director, Closing Session 5:00-5:30 pm Noshir Contractor vs. team competitions team vs. and Brian Uzzi Huang, Yun Satyam Mukherjee, Authors: Authors: Bill Lawless Authors: factor the victor influencing team in 2: Ecosystem Paper Paper 1: Perturbations of interdependent (science) (science) interdependent of 1: Perturbations Paper perfect reveal teams and dysfunctional teams Moderator: Bethany Laursen Bethany Moderator: Thematic Paper Session: Team Formation And Cohesion And Formation Team Session: Paper Thematic Abstracts Reviewer Acknowledgement

Submitted Abstracts

38 SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Abstracts Reviewer Acknowledgement

We would like to extend special thanks to our abstract reviewers:

Gabriele Bammer Julie Thompson Klein Deanna Pennington

Nicholas Berente Teresa Lant Reitman-Olson

Roger D. Blandford Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano Maritza Salazar

Stephen Crowley Wayne J. Lutters Jack Schultz

Deborah Diaz-Granados Justin Nash Daniel Stokols

Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski Linda Nebeling Amanda L. Vogel

Stephen Fiore Michael O’Rourke

Kara Hall Janet Okamoto

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 39 Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 terms, FAQ documents, educational webinars, and resulting to potentially were clarify confusing aglossary investigatorfurther leadership. Concrete actions and to betransparent about complexities that require need for ECHOto processes clarify where possible communication, andother. The results reinforced the sharing, setting expectations, collaboration facilitation, task? We summarized theresults into 5areas: vision ideas canECHOpilotto successfully complete this thischallenging task?;and3)what novelscience tackle the mostchallenging taskfor ECHO?;2)how canteam involving 11teams to address: 1)what doyou seeas of teamprinciples science. We thenhadateam exercise thesecond presented meeting,During anNIHexpert baseline for subsequent andevaluation. intervention facilitation, andengagement. Together asa theseserve communication, common language, collaboration opportunities, questionnairesame brief on:networking members. At thesemeetings, we administered the ECHO’stwo first in-personmeetingsinvolving >100 We beganevaluating ateam science approach at team science to research. promote transdisciplinary for goalincludes institutingbestpractices children. Its studiesamongruralintervention andunderserved studies ofchildren aswell as17clinicalsites for nation’s multiplelongitudinal supports children. It (ECHO) program in2016,to enhance thehealthofour Environmental influencesOutcomes onChildHealth The National ofHealthlaunchedthe Institutes Gillman Lake andMatthew Authors: Bray Park, Christina Catherine Patrick- Monk, researchtransdisciplinary inNIH’s ECHOProgram Paper team 1:Implementing science to promote Multi-Site HealthResearch Collaborations Tuesday, June13,2017 40 Thematic 1 Session SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts respondents agreed that theteam exercise produced The meetingevaluation showed that 77%of displayed at in-personmeetings. person meetings, oncohorts/science andstoryboards town hallsforvirtual thosenotinattendance ofin- protocol iscompleted. Ideasfor pilotsincluded: beforeconsent needsofcohorts thedata collection a smallinvestigator-led group to address informed Many features of theHCSRNhave contributed to and comparative studiesofhealthcare services. multi-site clinicaltrials, epidemiologic studies, include 20healthsystems to conduct withability many others. Since then,theHCSRNhasgrown to Permanente systems includingKaiser delivery and by leadersfrom six research centers embeddedin Research (HCSRN)was Network conceived in1994 financed, anddelivered. The Health Care Systems of myriad changesinhow care isorganized, care to studythe impact settings;andtheability inbothacross timeand that canbeobserved and healthcare claims;astablepopulation base automated data from healthrecords electronic populations. These systems offer assetsincluding: on how to improve healthofindividualsand unique advantages for research conducting Real-world systems healthcare provide delivery Authors: Sarah Greene Science: The HealthCare Systems Research Network Paper 2:A23-year Experiment inSustainable Team evaluation ofthemto improve the ECHO program. implementing team science approaches andongoing suggesting that we cancontinue to benefitfrom concrete science, ideasto enhance transdisciplinary Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 11:00-12:00pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 41 better experience, and lower cost, the HCSRN is a cost, and lower experience, better effectiveness in the wheel of comparative vital cog sustain the network to ways Identifying research. in an uncertain is our next great funding climate and data, our culture, but leveraging challenge, evidence-based to central care. are infrastructure collection, the VDW frees individual projects to individual projects to VDW frees collection, the specific scientific address to new variables develop organization and both the content Thus, questions. the as does evolve, to VDW continue of the and knowledge sophistication base about HCSRN’s using its data. importanceThe of collaboration: Culture of a network of peers cannot be comprised one another provide HCSRN sites understated. with complementary domain and disciplinary “bench” a deep have sites some expertise (e.g., who can or health economists of biostatisticians lack this expertise). that with sites collaborate annual and an value, learning is a shared Shared come to enables collaborators conference research learn not only to venue in a common together that but methods and approaches results, research uniquely pertinentare delivery research. to system on focus a growing Given Securing the Future: outcomes, of better in health care “triple aim” the federated data warehouse that could be re-used could that warehouse data federated multiple projects re-work. without for backbone model is the data A common Data: (VDW).Warehouse Virtual Data of the HCSRN’s It is virtual data health system local in that using warehouse, a local data at in place remain quality data improving for processes standardized Each sharing. of data governance and and validity, EHRs from information incorporates HCSRN site a into sources and administrative and other clinical variable tables with standardized VDW data set of given Again, coding. and definitions, labels, names, unified set a relatively have studies diverse that with perhaps 80% being common needs, of data data 20% being de novo study and study to from Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: elements (patient demographics, variables variables demographics, (patient elements utilization, and treatment, characterizing diagnosis CRN leaders elected build a to Hence, etc.). and end-of-life care. Central to this infrastructure this infrastructure to Central and end-of-life care. were studies cancer the discovery that was data the same research reusing frequently collaborative infrastructure that enabled studies that infrastructure collaborative survivorship to prevention cancer from ranging Research Network (CRN), funded by the National the National funded by Network (CRN), Research initiative the cornerstone was Institute, Cancer a robust develop the HCSRN to allowed that million in federal funding, as well as funding as well funding, million in federal on a Cancer initial focus An other sources. from mental health, aging, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacoepidemiology, health, aging, mental In 2012 alone, disease. and cardiovascular $340 received centers HCSRN member research HCSRN spawned several condition-specific condition-specific several HCSRN spawned diabetes, networks in cancer, research multi-site with respect to securing research dollars from dollars from securingwith respect research to ability and in its to and other sources, federal the In particular, care. and influence inform lead large research projects. projects. research lead large HCSRN has been productive The Funding: Research creating the organizational ethos. As such, it As ethos. the organizational creating to ecumenical approach and a balanced for strives sharing opportunities, such as the opportunity to and provide stability as Board members come stability members come as Board and provide the Network, for sets the tone Board The and go. the HCSRN hired an inaugural Executive Director Director Executive inaugural an the HCSRN hired position a full-time the need for recognizing lead the network, to visibility, ensure empowered stewards the network assets, and collectively and collectively the network assets, stewards priorities. advises its members on scientific In 2016, governance structure, wherein each member has each member has wherein structure, governance Board The of Governors. on the Board a designate imperatives, pursues strategic leadership, provides team-based multi-site collaborative model. model. collaborative multi-site team-based a representative HCSRN has The Governance: examine the factors that have contributed to the to contributed the factors have examine that the risks to as potential as well longevity, HCSRN’s its success, and also provide instructive guidance instructive guidance provide and also its success, will presentation This initiatives. other research for Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 Team Science Training For Graduate Students And Postdocs 42 Grant collaboration (GCNs) networks provide a resource for investigating team science efforts. themauseful with minimalerrors making data setsare accessible andcurated diligently research collaborations. Grant collaboration point oroutcome ofsuccessful andsustained Collaborative grants are theculminating often R etal. Clinical Translational Science2015). R etal., J. BiomedicalInformatics 2013;Nagarajan manner(Nagarajan evidence-based/data-driven team science intranslational settingsinan collaborations to quantify objectively andassess successfully analyticsofgrant usednetwork science approaches. recent Our studieshave translational research that demandteam inturn of especially emphasized theimportance Translational Science Awards, NCATS) have Grants from federal agencies(e.g. Clinical research. andtransdisciplinary multidisciplinary attributed to growing interdisciplinary, towardsincreasing shift team science potentially Recent studieshave demonstrated clearly an Nagarajan Authors: Radhakrishnan Paper Analytics 3:Network to Assess Team Science to influence thepopulation’s health.Akey goal ofthe behavioral, social, andenvironmental levels combined determinants ofhealthat thebiologic, genetic, scholarstotrained investigate 187early-career how Foundation’s (HSS)program Scholars Health& Society 2003and2016,theRobert Between Wood Johnson Weiss Moody, LindseyRealmuto, Laura Sheble andLinda Authors: Bachrach, Christine SheabaDaniel, James Program Science onInterdisciplinary Paper Interdisciplinary 1:Effects ofan Postdoctoral Thematic 2 Session SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts and cross-talk between communities intheGCN evaluation metrics. Inherent structures community settings andhasthepotential as to serve be usefulinevaluation inpre-/post-intervention deviation from random graphs canespecially evolution ofthesecommunities andtheir as internal controls. Understandingthetemporal surrogate models(e.g. network random graphs) of timeisalsoinvestigated by usingsynthetic strength ofthesecommunities asafunction communities andtheirtemporal evolution. The structures, community trivial cross-talk between that GCNscanprovide insights into inherent non- manner in-silico. thispresentation In we show can bestudiedinacontrolled andcost-effective convenient ofcollaborations abstraction that exercise across diverse settings. the findingspresented willdemand repeating the oftime. Universality asafunction of not conserved challenging asthenodeswell astheedgesare of theresults. Forecasting oftheGCNscanalsobe confounders that demandcareful interpretation and systems andprone perturbations to external policy.that canimpact However, GCNsare open- can alsoassistintargeted resource allocation Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. participants applied to theprogramparticipants 2003-2007; during identified through Science.Web of All study reached across disciplines inpublishedresearch measures that revealed theextent to whichscientists was Interdisciplinarity assessedusingnetwork research interdisciplinarity. presentation willdiscusstheeffects oftheprogram on control group drawn from finalists for theprogram. This sample ofprogram alumniandacloselymatched that compared career accomplishments amonga year, theprogram begananevaluation oftheprogram program was to develop scientists. interdisciplinary Last 11:00-12:00pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 43 Paper 3: Training Future Team Scientists: Team Future Training 3: Paper Course Translational Reflections from Chao, Mark Huda Sarraj, Hellmich, Celia Authors: Wooten Kevin Christina Cestone, Judy Aronson, Brasier and Allan for research training in which Ph.D. candidates candidates in which Ph.D. training research for with direct support research, perform collaborative include two Teams” “TL1 grant. TL1 training via a degree different from students Ph.D. or more members Team colleges. least two in at programs specific aims new team develop to collaborate of individual research the scope expand that have Teams TL1 health. human to projects related a particular e.g., interest, research a common different at human disease being investigated with different population), (molecular to levels different and/or at approaches, experimental identify Teams continuum. T0-T4 parts of the members projects of team in which research ways alternative provide each other, will inform analysis or data approaches experimental etc. collection assist with data or analysis, methods, doctoral can transform science of team science The opportunities welcome expand to and we training, institutions. model across this training through experiential work requiring collaboration, collaboration, requiring work experiential through Therapeutics: & Research “Translational e.g., in which & Policy”, Community, Bench, Bedside, multidisciplinary unmet an identify teams instruction multimodal experience medical need, learning (TBL),including team-based and develop stages of translational T0-T4 at proposals research their unmet medical need, address to research practice in which teams Science”, “Team and and management, assembly, skills team for dissertation Mentored performance monitoring. specific includes clinical/translational research and career for program and an extensive aims, supports development academic professional A unique interests. and nonacademic career model of our CTS is a team-based program feature Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: A CTS Ph.D. co-major is available to students students to co-major is available A CTS Ph.D. in eleven programs partner 40 in over Ph.D. skills research strengthen courses Core colleges. academic and nonacademic career pathways. pathways. academic and nonacademic career include a curriculum elements based on Essential training. research and team-based science team science training enhances research effectiveness, effectiveness, research enhances training science for must be prepared researchers and that The UF Clinical & Translational Science (CTS) Ph.D. (CTS) Science Ph.D. Translational UF Clinical & The team that based on the premises is program Clinical & Translational Ph.D. Students Ph.D. Translational Clinical & McCormack T. Wayne Authors: Paper 2: If We Expect Future Scientists To Work in Teams, Teams, in Work To Scientists Expect Future We 2: If Paper for Training Team They Should in Teams: Be Trained • Discussion of study implications, strengths, and strengths, • Discussion of study implications, weaknesses. • Results from univariate analysis and multivariate and multivariate analysis univariate • Results from and confounders on potential controlling analyses mediators; for a close match between program participants and program between a close match for controls; • The approach to interdisciplinary training used in HSS; interdisciplinary training to approach The • including evidence of the evaluation, design The • developing cross-disciplinary developing researchers. will address: presentation The results suggest that programs specifically designed to designed specifically programs suggest that results interdisciplinary can be impactful scientists in produce Our results show that those who participated that show in the Our results higher on virtually scored all measures HSS program The in their published work.of interdisciplinarity and measures the median distance (weighted) in the (weighted) the median distance and measures in a paper. network among all pairs of references examines the extent to which there is disciplinary which there to the extent examines published person’s in a cited within references diversity directly uses network distances second The research. interdisciplinary reach. The first approach uses network first approach The interdisciplinary reach. disciplines and identify algorithmsclustering to published research was observed was during 2011-2015. research published defining to approaches two report from results We Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 44 Conceptual And Theoretical Frameworks For Understanding Team Science A Field Guide.” the NIHdocument “Collaboration in Team Science: the eight team science competencies outlinedin team science. Students’ responses were mappedto on theirperceptions andattitudes aboutIPMD oftheexerciseassignment discussingtheimpact course, students completed areflective writing translational research proposal. At theendof forproject eachteam (n=5teams) was anNIH-style or prevention ofhumandisease. The capstone a significant treatment, gapinthedetection, a translational research that project addresses teamed withmedicalstudents (n=10)to design which biomedicalgraduate students (n=6)were We developed aneight-week IPMD course, in Method collaborations. scientists andphysicians inIPMD to takepart offormalpaucity training to prepare biomedical is well documented. However, there remains a scientists andcliniciansto translational research (IPMD) collaborationsMultidisciplinary between ofInterprofessionalThe importance and Problem Statement when appearing simultaneously”when appearing (Lewis, 2000, p. 760). that seemlogical inisolation butabsurd andirrational as “contradictory yet interrelated elements –elements & Smith,2016),including teams. Paradox canbeseen Smith &Lewis, 2001;Lewis, 2000;Schad, Lewis, Raish, organization phenomena(Cameron 1988; &Quinn, a successful framework to thestudyof alllevels of thelast25years, Over Objective: paradox hasbeen Kevin WootenAuthors: Scientific Develop Teams Paper 1: The Use ofParadox to Study, Understand, and Thematic 3 Session SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts an authentic translational research experience ofourcourseA majorobjective was to create Significance recognized by any ofthestudents. Credit(Sharing andLeveraging were Network) not within theirteam. Two oftheteam competencies examples where was practiced thiscompetency commonly identified, with9of16students citing 0 to 5.Developing Shared Vision was themost competencies mentioned perstudent ranged from in theiressays (mean=2.30.3). The numberof twoidentified competencies from thefieldguide team science competencies, students onaverage While students were notexplicitly askedto identify Results of the learning inthisinitialcohort. of thelearning competencies/student andto assessthedurability to improvethe curriculum theacquisition of experience.writing thefuture In we planto modify science competencies into theirIPMD grant recognized andcontextualized at leasttwo team evidence suggeststhat moststudents successfully competencies inourstudents. Preliminary to introduce anddevelop IPMD team science paradoxes are shown in Table 1.Schad, Lewis, Raish, of learning, organizing, belonging, andperforming team science illustrations relating to common types developed by Schad, Lewis, andSmith(2016), Raish, andFindings:Methods Basedonthetypology analysis isappropriate. ideologies, andmethodologies, theuseofparadoxical integration across different individuals, disciplines, teamBecause science involves collaboration and types ofparadoxspecifically and contextual factors. established to studyparadox to scientific teams, The ofthispaperisto purpose applytheframeworks Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 11:00-12:00pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 45 Cooperation vs. competition vs. Cooperation principle aims of network agenda of vs. Research team Multiple objectives and stakeholders patient/community vs. Scientific objectives objectives by questioning what they cover in sciences that are are that in sciences they cover questioning what by phenomena. Our argument, in educational interested of research of a corpus on the analysis founded that show aims to projects and their evaluations, interdisciplinarity categorize only using disciplines to progress to make significant order in does not suffice disciplinary Over and above these questions. involving contextually derived theory of paradox to illustrate how how illustrate theory to derived contextually of paradox is occur likely to are tensions science and when team theory both general to as theoryinstrumental well as in practice. in the on interdisciplinarity views 2: Differing Paper human and social sciences and Daniel Frandji KristineAuthors: Lund is not Interdisciplinarity and social sciences in human plurality of the the extent and to understood, well yet this by of the meanings covered the heterogeneity disciplines from together work notion. If researchers their outsiders, by seen as close together are that is often not acknowledgedinterdisciplinarity by — a curious term interdisciplinarity “Real” institutions. — is often seen as occurring disciplines that between very and are far apart goals, methods, in theories, interdisciplinarity? “real” is But what object of study. on multiple disciplines founded is that can science How clarify these notions to aim “far apart”?We or “close” be Performing Performing • • • • WK. Raish Smith S, MW, Lewis Schad J, from: Adapted Looking back science: in management research Paradox Manag A. 2016; 1-60. Acad forward. move to team science field of The Field: of SciTS Advancement explain to framework without a common is currently Use of a based conflictstensions. or predict team and Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Individual vs. collective Individual vs. member/follower team vs. leader Team Competing identities Researcher vs. mentor/ vs. Researcher identities Competing educator Management science vs. science science vs. Management science Business model vs. scientific Business model vs. autonomy/empowerment vs. Control Alignment vs. flexibility vs. Alignment Incremental scientific progress vs. scientific scientific vs. progress scientific Incremental breakthrough development of new methods development long-term Short-term vs. Stability vs. change Stability vs. or adoption familiarityMethodological vs. Exploration vs. exploitation vs. Exploration commercialization vs. Scientific discovery SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: • • • • Belonging • • Organizing Organizing • • • • • • • Type Team Science Illustrations Science Team Type Learning Table 1. Types of Paradox and Team Science Illustrations Team and of Paradox Types 1. Table discover needed individual and team based change individual and team needed discover are that working the paradox) through (i.e., strategies 2008). (Cameron, in nature positive should be used to help develop a more extensive and and extensive a more help develop should be used to theory also be used can Paradox explanatory base. to development team for framework as a diagnostic Stipleman, & Stokols, 2011). Qualitative and mixed mixed and 2011). Qualitative & Stokols, Stipleman, teams in scientific study paradox to methods research the team science specific conditions such as degree degree conditions such as specific science the team 1992) and (Rosenfield, of disciplinary integration Voegel, (Hall, stage of transdisciplinary progress team innovation, and scarcity vs. resource abundance, abundance, resource vs. and scarcity innovation, along with science, seen in team and these can be and Smith also have purported the environmental purported also have and Smith the environmental change vs. competition, plurality of vs. conditions Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 research community. Arecent Nature Index endeavors for many isapriority inthebiomedical Accelerating collaborative highimpact, scientific Alina Lungeanu and Yulia Tyshchuk Authors: Griffin Weber, Noshir Contractor, Gopal, Shuba by establishinginstitutes to promote team science? Paper 1:Can cross-university collaboration befacilitated Centers And Institutes To Promote Team Science - What Leads To Success? 46 special challenges. These challengeshave sparked that thisformof thefact ofresearch posesitsown as well aspromise. This growth hasoccurred inspite dramatically inrecent decades—bothinprevalence Collaborative, research interdisciplinary hasgrown Authors: Bethany Laursen reasoning? team ofinterdisciplinary science The heart Paper 3: What iscollaborative, interdisciplinary both from aresearcher andevaluator perspective. explained by thedisciplinewithwhichoneidentifies, how assumptionsaboutinterdisciplinarity isnotsolely Sciencefield ofthe of ScienceTeam inthat we show boundaries. results Our helpadvance the disciplinary interdisciplinarity fall into donotfallsoclearly that researchers useto bothpresent andevaluate the epistemological andontological assumptions sciences. analyses Our ofsubmissionsshow that political science, educational science, andlanguage local researchers mainlyfrom , history, funded two callsfor in2016involving projects education at theEcole Supérieure Normale inLyon The newFrench of laboratory interdisciplinary suppose. interestsand theknowledge (Habermas, 1973)they and are focused rather onmobilized socialontologies dimensions that are more fundamental to knowledge boundaries, thekeyquestions concern transversal Thematic 4 Session SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts Massachusetts Institute of Institute Massachusetts Technology have the (MIT) ofthereason why University andthe Harvard part collaboration”.driving particular, In it suggeststhat cautions that the report “proximity isjustone factor organizations ormetro inthesamecity area.” However, world, halfare nearly between pairsofresearch between two institutionsaround the partnerships Collaborations noted report “of the100strongest collaborative reasoning ispursuedfor thesakeof together.” Wright andCampolo emphasize that conditions of (4, 5)onthenecessary “reasoning refines itwith work by Wright (2,3)and Campolo understanding ofrational discourse (1)andfurther from This aHabermasian viewofCIRtakesitsdeparture teammates. repair ofintersubjective values andstandards among centered andco- co-creation, ontheco-application, reasoning (CIR). This paperpresents ananalysis ofCIR these research teams: collaborative, interdisciplinary themostbasictaskof understanding ofperhaps Underrated inthismeta-research isaclear processes, aliterature to whichthispapercontributes. meta-research oncollaborative, interdisciplinary required for reasoning interdisciplinary to succeed. integrationIntersubjective ofthesevalues istypically disciplines.and concepts ofthevarious participating inthemethods,are standards, packaged frameworks, team interdisciplinary settings, In thesevalues partners. mutually evaluate reasons given by theirconversation requires that interlocutors share values sothat theycan Campolo point outthat resuming adiscourse rationally research project. Together withHabermas, Wright and as “research questions” that instigate acollaborative misunderstandings. CIR,theseinterruptions manifest In by newevidence, circumstances, interlocutors, or continuing adiscourse that was interrupted, perhaps Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

11:00-12:00 pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 47 transdisciplinary research collaboration was created created was collaboration transdisciplinary research in the arts applications computational explore to and successes struggles group’s The and humanities. others looking overcome map for to a road provide and administrative cultural structural, the significant universities. in most research barriers inherent establishing a priori goals and themes, devising a establishing a priori goals and themes, and modify membership, determine personnel plan to establishing structures, reward working influence to selecting management, a in the institution’s influence one or more and identifying particular kindleader, of all the pieces who see that “champions” individual with faculty Negotiating appropriately. together come team to commit get them willing to to researchers and there hurdles, building can be one of the biggest an outline of I will provide this. accomplish to ways are and institutional overcoming to optimal approaches on individual barriers interdisciplinary collaboration to campuses. university building a collaborative Computing: 3: Cultural Paper and the arts, sciences across humanities, team research engineering. Beck Stephen Authors: is a case-study presentation a This on how with little regard for whether or not the available the available whether or not for regard with little together. work to reason actually have researchers has to team-building in which a situation creates This who weren’t researchers involving happen post hoc, thinking the start. about it at center ‘undesigned’ of such an I will use an example institutional barriers the widespread identify to of interdisciplinary development successful to from range These centers. and programs collaborative of a management a lack to systems contrary reward as poor as well follow-through, structure for and individual vision and attitudes. communication research collaborative interdisciplinary, Successful must be ways so there do exist, and programs centers include These with institutional barriers. cope to Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: with new hires focused on common themes and themes on common focused with new hires But much of the time effortsto encourage teamwork. proceeds researchers among university science team or programs of one sort or another. In a few cases such In a few of one sortor programs or another. primarily populated been have or programs centers collaboration. They also appreciate the fondness the fondness also appreciate They collaboration. and many these concepts, for funding agencies have interdisciplinary centers developing up by following are Most research-intensive universities claim to claim to universities Most research-intensive and scientific interdisciplinarity of the value appreciate interdisciplinarity in academia interdisciplinarity Jack Schultz Authors: adopt to accelerate their own collaborative endeavors. collaborative their own accelerate adopt to of the problem failure: science Team 2: Paper have, as well as what distinguishes each. We will We distinguishes each. as what as well have, can other organizations that key features highlight partnering more often with faculty from Harvard’s partnering often Harvard’s with faculty more from what our findings on We will share hospitals. affiliated the unique impact to these institutes contribute may from a much wider cross-section of other institutions. a much wider cross-sectioninstitutions. of other from a clinical focus, toward tend publications Broad Further, Broad involvement. Broad publications also have more more also have publications Broad involvement. Broad (17.43 publications Whitehead than collaborators collaborators and typically 8.85), authors vs have with Broad involvement have more than double the than more have involvement with Broad of Harvard without count or MIT publications citation even when institutions are organized to promote promote to organized when institutions are even teams the structure of the resulting collaborations, publications for field, controlling When can differ. that when controlling for year, Broad and Whitehead Whitehead and Broad year, for when controlling that similar impact, show with 117.3 and publications article. per respectively 114.6 citations However, area of genome research, and they both support of genome research, area found We span Harvard that and MIT. collaborations publications from Broad and the nearby Whitehead Whitehead and the nearby Broad from publications founded Both Genome were Research. Institute for in the approach a deeply collaborative promote to Institute of MIT and Harvard. We sought to test test to sought We Institute and Harvard. of MIT of a bibliometric analysis through this hypothesis highest collaborative index of any pair of institutions pair of any index highest collaborative the Broad called venture joint is a world the across Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 Panel: Reward andRecognition Across Attending theSpectrum: to theNeedsofMultiple Collaboration Stakeholders intheProfessions andLearning. 48 isespeciallytrueforthis risk career early researchers, delay whomust often collaborative work until tenure has allocation ofrecognition andcollaborative ininterdisciplinary projects, andmuchoftheliterature suggeststhat & Sonnenwald, &Parker, 2005;Rhoten 2004;Zucker, 2012).Academic rank andstatus cannegatively affectthe (Carayol & Thi, 2005;Coberly &Gray, 2010;Harris, Lyon, &Clarke, 2009;Horlick-Jones &Sime, 2004;Maglaughlin 2013). Krzesinski, Therefore, research interdisciplinary interms canbeconsidered ofcareer progression risky achievements althoughthere rather inrecent work, doesappearto thaninterdisciplinary beashift years (Falk- Historically, promotion individualanddisciplinary andtenure andpoliciesappearto practices support dominant concerns (Fox &Faver, 1984;Georghiou, 1988;Hackett, 2005;Sonnenwald, 2007). interdisciplinary, collaborative work (Wray, andincreased 2006), andlossofidentity through risk collaboration are & Hodges, 2009).Researchers anxiousaboutreceiving adequate recognition for theirwork may shy away from 1997;Laberge, through formed Albert, andnetworks themultiplecontacts outofcollaborations &Martin, (Katz (Beaver, 2001;Beaver 1979), and personalrecognition &Rosen, canincrease ofthework produced thevisibility careercredited advancement. to support Researchers are motivated by increased recognition andvisibility individual, team, andorganizational levels require specific attention to ensure that individualsare appropriately incomplexcontinue problem to gainimportance solving, concerns aboutrecognition andreward at structures the professional scholarsgiven thenature ofacademe. engagements As collaborative andcross-disciplinary principles Problem. Proper recognition andreward for for collaborative and learners are important critically activities Authors keys issues relating to joint appointments, andits University promotion &tenure policiesdidnotaddress to share timeandresources suchfaculty. to support andcolleges werebudget, butdepartments reluctant forMoney hires joint faculty was intheoriginating Challenges were inestablishingthisnewgroup. plenty for research andeconomic development inthisarea. nascent strengths at theuniversity andtheopportunity of aresearch group indigital media,recognizing the council for the center authorized theestablishment science, fluiddynamics, astrophysics), thegoverning to traditional computational disciplines(materials research center incomputational science. addition In aninterdisciplinary state fundsto establishandsupport 2003,ouruniversity investedIn $9millioninrecurring Thematic 1 Session :

Gaetano R.Lotrecchiano,Gaetano Holly J. Falk-Krzesinksi O’Rourke andMichael SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts humanities, science andengineering. problemsaddress that cross complex artistic thearts, teams were identified, assembledandincentivized to of theresearch. And we willfocus onhow research nature willillustratenetworks thetransdisciplinary Projects intangible interaction andmusic-over- artistic led to significantbreakthroughs. scientific and location, shared values andrandom coffee meetings We willpresent two instances where co- faculty units. amongallparticipating intellectual) thebenefits(financialand andsharing departments, goals andvalues, requiring financialbuy-in from We overcame by identifying thesebarriers common injoint research participation projects. departmental F&A policiesdidnotprovide sufficient incentives for Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

1:30pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 49 1:30 pm

collaborative research. However, there are no currently no currently are there However, research. collaborative on the impactpublished data on expression training of the purpose of this Therefore, CRFs. of intrapersonal the impact skills of a team explore to study was training on participantworkshop of CRFs. expression who regularly Sixteen biomedical researchers the Research at research participate in collaborative part of an evidence-based skills team program. training member team that it has been stated Additionally, readiness collaboration of intrapersonal expression flexibility, such as methodological factors (CRFs), attitude and a positive spirit, inclusiveness, cooperative of the outcome can influence collaboration, towards Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 2 Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: number of competencies, including self-and-others number of competencies, such processes and team communication, awareness, to include as would be logical these clarification, as role increasing the competencies of researchers engaging engaging of researchers the competencies increasing a teams share scientific effective As in collaboration. Scientists are not traditionally trained to engage in to trained not traditionally Scientists are skills team Consequently, research. collaborative in interested an organization be useful for may training Authors: Katherine and KatherineAuthors: Campbell Stackpoole Paper 1: The Impact of Team Skills Training on the Training Skills Team ImpactThe of 1: Paper Readiness of Intrapersonal Collaboration Expression Factors collaborative engagement, and advocating for appropriate infrastructures and policies that further and policies that infrastructures appropriate recognition for and advocating engagement, collaborative of engagement. on each level and reward that targets learner, professional, and organizational dynamics, this cross-topical conversation can advance can advance conversation this cross-topical dynamics, and organizational professional, learner, targets that skills, maintaining collaborative developing between the relationship consider scientists team that the way SciTS Advancement. As collaboration priorities become more commonplace amongst professionals as a means to as a means to amongst professionals commonplace priorities more become collaboration As SciTS Advancement. structures and policies that problem-solving, cross-disciplinary and complex greater integration accomplishing and often approach By taking not clearly defined. remain disparate a multilayer this is accomplished define how employed in their professional environments. environments. in their professional employed (Dr. O’Rourke), motivations that drive stakeholders to collaborate (Dr. Lotrecchiano), and structuresand policies Lotrecchiano), (Dr. collaborate stakeholders to O’Rourke), drive that motivations (Dr. emerging to will be introduced Participants Falk-Krzesinski). (Dr. collaboration and recognize encourage that can be that and strategies concerns specific in discussion around and be engaged areas in these thought Method. The panel discussion will explore three main areas of concern for recognition and reward of collaborative of collaborative and reward recognition for of concern main areas three will explore panel discussion The Method. and cross-disciplinarycollaborative engagement reward that and scholarlyLearning efforts: strategies research settings to promote collaboration, and (b) how best to evaluate individual mastery individual evaluate while simultaneously best to how and (b) collaboration, promote settings to practices. collaborative robust encouraging (Hara, Solomon, Kim, & Sonnenwald, 2003). However, the skills required to achieve this are this are to achieve the skillsrequired 2003). However, community (Hara, Solomon, scientific Kim, & Sonnenwald, lack remains There senior scholars. with more engage professionals as early career post-training often acquired in educational structures required and reward important two (a) the recognition to considerations: of attention For students, participating in scientific collaborations is a sign of recognition and acceptance by the greater greater by the and acceptance recognition of participating is a sign collaborations students, scientific in For been achieved (Boden, Borrego, & Newswander, 2011; Carayol & Thi, 2005; Maglaughlin & Sonnenwald, 2005; 2005; Maglaughlin 2005; & Sonnenwald, Thi, & 2011; Carayol & Newswander, (Boden, Borrego, been achieved 1999). Thurow, & Abdalla, Gray, Younglove-Webb, Competencies Science Team Science - Developing Team For Training Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 50 of decisionson thecommunities where development How muchthought sustainability? goesinto theimpact of theconcept ofdevelopment, ortheconcept of development teams have a shared understanding from globaldevelopment include:domembers of of mutualunderstanding. that Questions may arise among thevarious teams involved, leadingto alack to thelackofcommunication this isattributable inpart of theirwork. The failure ofdevelopment like projects andtherealand dialogueaboutthepurpose impact anabsence reflects this project ofcritical reflection Organization (NGO) through alocal, national NGO, Fundedtransport. by aninternational Non-Government was empty, unstaffed, andinaccessible by public rehabilitation center for children. malnourished It asmallrural stood villageinBolivia abrandIn new O’Rourke andMichael Authors: Rinkus Anna Malavisi, Marisa Development Teamsfor PaperDevelopment: onGlobal A 2:Reflecting Toolbox significant population is recommended. ofthis andpotentialto studythe frequency impact for theSciTSfield.importance Additional research toprimed engageincollaborative research isof Understanding thisexciting population ofresearchers toprior training. who expressed ahigh-level ofcollaboration readiness the studyalsoidentified apopulation of researchers followingby participants theworkshop. Unexpectedly, increase (p=0.03)intheexpression ofat leastoneCRF responses. The data showed astatistically significant workshop survey changes between pre-and-post workshop survey. Apaired t-test was usedto analyze wereparticipants administered anidentical post- Immediately following completion oftheworkshop, of thefour intrapersonal CRFsmentioned above. designed toworkshop measure survey expression and team processes. Participants were given apre- awareness,focusing onself-and-others communication, training workshop team skills enrolled inafive-hour atInstitute Nationwide Children’s Hospitalwere SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts concrete, andtangible approach to dialogue critical (http://toolbox-project.org) offers aninnovative, each other’s eyes. The Toolbox DialogueInitiative colleagues to seethedevelopment landscapethrough differences andenhance communication by enabling identification ofpotentially damagingcan support and beliefs that influence decisions. This dialogue for anddialogueaboutthe reflection values critical development teams, there isaneedto generate aspace Within development organizations, andparticularly the effectiveness ofinternational development efforts. understanding withindevelopment teams canimprove these andotherissuesthat deep, undermine mutual it be? We submitthat dialogueabout structured organizations focus theirwork? How muchshould teams, addressing issuesincluding rationale for team a Collaboration Plan” isanexcellent resource for specific to collaborative interactions.” “How to Write improvementand engaging inquality activities as implementing andmanaging thecollaboration, laying thefoundation for thecollaboration, aswell plans shouldaddress arange ofissuesrelevant to a research team. As Halletal. state, “Collaboration in codifying astep-by-step approach to developing to Write aCollaboration Plan” firststep isanimportant Hall, Crowston, and Vogel’s of draft 2014working “How Stephanie VaskoAuthors: Developing aCollaboration Plan Paper 3: The ofPersonal Role(s) Development in Skills academic research inaglobal context. aidand applied to inhumanitarian teams working argue that theanalysis presented here canalsobe challenges that confront globaldevelopment.We also modifying thisapproach to address thecommunication ethical issues, andepistemic injustice. We propose assumptions, power dynamics, implicit biases, developmentthat afflict teams, suchas conflicting discussion andanalysis ofspecific concerns such issues that matter to them; second, itcanenable for dialoguewithindevelopment critical teams about that canhelpintwo ways. First, itcangenerate aspace Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 51 improvement than other disciplines (p<.05). improvement the first and only remains Coalesce Conclusions: the for science in team online training open-access, of the first generation from Data health professions. is widely accessed teamscience.net that users indicate and social, the biomedical, users from diverse by with biomedical versus other disciplinary with biomedical versus background of users (2011-2016). the first generation from teamscience.net 2016, through 2011 Results: From than 80,000 unique individuals, more by visited was provided and registered of whom 2,103 voluntarily 66.8% Of number, information. that demographic in academia; 46.4% were 72.7% worked female; were had a doctorate; 46.6% in biomedical science; trained primary in learning about and 66.8% expressed interest science. of team than the science) the practice (rather both module pre- who completed and post- Those team science in improvement significant showed tests self-efficacy and attitudes, knowledge, for all modules which improvement 1, for module (p<.001) except nonsignificant. in knowledge were and attitudes other disciplines in biomedical versus trained Those showed sciences) engineering physical, social, (e.g., except module, on any no performance differences which those for module 4 on biomedical science, pre-post greater showed biomedical science in trained developed to support to developed cross-disciplinary science team with CTSA Launched in 2011 training. support,the first science team 101) introduces Science module (Team and concepts experts foundational who present Team Science (TS). Interactive of findings in the science through work 4 enable learnersmodules 2, 3, and to challenges in behavioral, science team simulated while acting and basic biomedical science in clinical, or scientist, senior of early stage investigator, the roles respectively. officer, development research and of the site users characterize To Objectives: team science of the modules on the effects evaluate and self-efficacy. attitudes, knowledge, to applied linear models were Methods: Generalized pre-postevaluate changes in performance among users Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Background: The four Coalesce online learning modules Coalesce four The Background: resource an open-access are teamscience.net at Authors: Bonnie Spring, H. Gene McFadden, Katya H. Gene McFadden, Bonnie Spring, Authors: Donald Hedeker, Vernon, Rak, Philip Klyachko, Frank Pfammatter Juned Siddique and Angela Paper 4: Effectiveness of the Coalesce Online Learning Online Coalesce of the 4: Effectiveness Paper ModulesScience Training Team for professional (RDP), and community engagement (RDP), and community engagement professional communities. and implementation scientist (I2S), interdisciplinary scientist and implementation development (IES), research scientist executive of handling personal skills-building in bringing by specialists who posses these skill handle sets and could the integration like those from trainings, internal different levels within MSU to inform and influence on- and influence to inform MSU within levels different campus opportunities. I will also discuss the possibility (TDI) is working University within the Michigan State skills key individual identify (MSU) community to TDI is working among the and how science team for collaboration. collaboration. Dialogue Initiative Toolbox the how I will present management, and training. I will discuss the role (and I will discuss the role and training. management, academic of the institution (both obligation) potential individuals in these skill and funding) in training sets for (but not limited to) individual collaboration readiness, readiness, individual collaboration to) (but not limited and conflict prevention & coordination, communication accountability in participatingaccountability team in and managing skills These bridge several 2017). (Vasko, science plan, including sections collaboration of a potential on team collaboration. Specifically, I will focus on focus I will Specifically, collaboration. on team and resilience, of skillsthe roles including flexibility, In this talk, I will discuss expanding “How to Write Write to “How In this talk, discuss expanding I will impact and the potential of Plan” a Collaboration and skills-building development on personal focusing management, training, quality improvement activities, quality improvement training, management, allocation. and budget/resource communication & coordination, leadership/ & coordination, communication and conflictprevention management/administration, approach and team configuration, collaboration collaboration configuration, and team approach functioning, team readiness, technological readiness, Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 52 presence ofteamwork state profiles inthe prominent change over time. The present research aimsto test the consider themto bestate profiles, since theycan time for asetofemergent states andprocesses, we represent where ateam standsat agiven point in and outcomes (O’Neill, etal., 2016).As theseprofiles and that thesepatterns future canpredict interactions to exhibit particular, qualitatively patterns, meaningful paradigm proposes that teams canhave thetendency (i.e., team centric, O’Neill, etal., 2015). The team-centric variable centric) to patterns ormultiplexes ofvariables involves inmindsetfrom individualvariables (i.e., ashift framework. The ofteamwork structure state profiles processes viatheMarks, Mathieu, &Zaccaro (2001) in thecontext ofengineering design teamwork concept ofprofiles, providing an example ofapplication team science researchers to the andpractitioners current assessments ofteams. Specifically, we introduce approach to introduce theuseofteamwork profiles in address thisissueby moving beyond avariable centric (Kozlowski, 2015). The present research aimsto to approach themeasurement ofteams dynamically such asinengineering design. Indeed, many studiesfail teamsunderstanding thedynamicsofinterdisciplinary team measurement inarigorous manner, especiallyin contexts, researchers are challengedwithapproaching With theincreased useofteams inorganizational PatelFlynn, Apurva andJoshuaSummers Authors: Shuffler, Marissa Kramer, William Michelle Understanding Engineering Design Teams Paper 1:ProfileMechanism Analytics asa for foundsome usersreportedly overwhelming. Nomajor the more module1,which less structured didactic, knowledge, attitudes, andself-efficacy, except for modules were alleffective inimproving team science ratherpractice thanthe science ofteam science. The physical interest sciences whoexpress inthe primary Evaluating And Enhancing Team Processes Thematic 3 Session SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts processes (e.g., conflict resolution) that interact processes (e.g., completing goals),andinterpersonal experience transition processes (e.g., planning),action and Zaccaro (2001).From thisperspective, teams team process framework proposed by Marks, Mathieu, engaged research. application ofteam science to principles community Coalesce andexpansion ofitscontent to demonstrate discuss plannedtechnological improvements for and otherscientists derived from themodules. We differences were seeninthebenefitthat biomedical developmental evaluations (2014).Most are outcome differenttypes ofevaluations: outcome, process, and To solve thisproblem, Wooten etal. proposed three have alonger-term impact? iftheteam isengaging wayknow inameaningful to ifa teamto is know ‘successful?’ What if you needto take years to gather. What ifyou onlyhave sixmonths institutional standards. However, likethesemay metrics ifateam issuccessfulus know by mostresearch and measures help are ofsuccess important andcertainly patents to determine ifateam was successful. These we lookat likepublications, metrics grants, orinvention What makesa successful team? What is ‘success?” Often Authors: HannahLove andJeniCross Teams Paper Research andSuccessful 2:Connecting Methods analysis, transitional analysis). methodologies andanalyses (e.g., latent profile teamwork profiles alongwithdiscussingappropriate teamwork profiles, andprovide examples ofpotential teamwork that may factors berelevant indynamic engaged inasemester-long project, we demonstrate of mechanicalengineering student design teams to create effective teams. Drawing from asample Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

1:30pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 53 (IDR) and Interdisciplinary Product Development (IDR) and Interdisciplinary Development Product practices and to is adherence example Another (IPD). agenda – the team’s advance fail to that paradigms done it.” always have we the way “because that’s roles differentiated by characterized Both domains are knowledge;and specialized task interdependence; women, clarity of team vision, and collaborative history clarity vision, and collaborative women, of team between as relationships as well members, between externalteam and partners,the scientific either or community organizations. practitioner, industry, for the SciTS specific implications findings have These for development including necessaryfield, professional building and mission definition), team (regarding teams the importance of external partners the in informing seed funding can most as how as well goal, research teams in collaboration productive accelerate effectively research. of and scopes sizes of different Achieving for Techniques 4: 21st Century Paper the Hidden Despite Curriculum Collaboration Authors: Wade Derek Carole keynote, 2014 Science Team In of her Science is increasingly Practice Research “Open Goble noted is one example This Softwarelike Open Source Practice.” Interdisciplinary between of a co-informing Research methods included observationmethods types of various of team interviews members, with team informal meetings, and social network During meetings our surveys. team on capturing: of number focused observations were speaking each participant, turns by type of knowledge of participants, between and the idioculture shared conducted Innetwork social each team. addition, we network based on social surveys of each team analysis administered surveysThe were observations. and team after of the program, the beginning at times, three found We year. end of the second the and at one year, distinct least three types at of successful are there and teams, large transdisciplinary small teams, teams: characteristics distinguish that The of teams. teams teams the least successful from the most successful included: types proportion interaction, of team of Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: funding. This longitudinal study used mixed methods used mixed study longitudinal This funding. evaluation and developmental conductto a process Research years. two over teams research of ten of seed money to supportof seed money to of new the formation with the goal of teams, interdisciplinary research seed the original from achieving a 10X on investment The Vice President for Research (VPR) Research for President issued a call for Vice The $200,000 teams several and awarded applications The objective of this research was to assess how ten ten assess how to was objective of this research The time with transdisciplinary over developed teams program. sponsored a university seed funding from Authors: Jennifer Cross and Hannah Love Cross Jennifer Authors: Paper 3: What makes a team?: An Evaluation of an Evaluation An makes a team?: What 3: Paper Program Development Team Interdisciplinary support for our teams to develop new and innovative new and innovative develop support to our teams for science. has helped our institutions coach, identify, and support identify, has helped our institutions coach, process. earlier in the teaming teams successful and institutional budgets maximize us to Allowing impacts. evaluation our process methods in our refined Finally, evaluation of teams. Further, we will explain how how will explain we Further, of teams. evaluation larger have evaluation in a process results positive evaluation and outcome macro-level and longer-term We will provide results which demonstrate how how which demonstrate results will provide We meso-level is used in a process data mixed-methods methods meso-level data collection highlighting three methods meso-level collection three data highlighting coding methods: social network analysis, research taking, and participant evening-turn for observation. interviewing members of teams. interviewing members of teams. overview an our mixed will provide we In this paper, participant conducting observation, meetings, coding and data, publication historical studying groups, focus Wooten et al, process evaluation study how the team the team study how evaluation process et al, Wooten (2014). and engagement meetings, team interacts, network used social analysis, we have specifically, More transdisciplinary research teams and gathered meso- and gathered teams transdisciplinary research to According evaluation. a process and for data level evaluations where metrics like publications and and metricspublications like where evaluations eight followed we two-years For and collected. grants Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 54 of IPDteam-work, accountability withoutauthority, and budgetisimpededby thehiddencurriculum of explicit information abouttask-work, status, time overload. Their responsibility for themanagement “communication hub,” suffers from information -- The Project role, Manager intended to bea cost, delay,which addsfurther andrisk. decouple information, decisionpoints, andaction, hierarchies.decision-making These hierarchies reinforce existing socialsilos, andcreate cumbersome innovation,standards cross-discipline that restrict -- Enforcement ofteam compliance to procedures and out-of-date. tends to decayinitial activities rapidly asitbecomes mental models. What value that iscreated by these into andfailsto projects noticeably improve team or team events),“kickoff” whichbuildsadditionaldelay -- Over-focus oninputs(e.g. plans up-front large-scale and includessuchsymptoms as: Product Development, ofInterdisciplinary curriculum management paradigm result from thehidden outcomesthe intended ofthisproject andactual address, especiallyat scale. The differences between results inmitigating theissuesitwas intended to Today, thisparadigm achieves onlymediocre activities. communication, coordination, andintegration management team ofproject members’role-based a “project management” paradigm: centralized, in 1970’s-era projects. are Suchpractices basedon established andstillwidelyused--have theirroots teams. However, many --whilewell IPDpractices effectiveResearch practices Interdisciplinary for IPDteam couldSome practices offer insight into integration. time andbudgetoverruns, andfailures at thepoints of to team coordination andcommunication challenges, haveIPD thesecharacteristics historically given rise and theinterplay oftacitandexplicit knowledge. In dynamic workflows adapting to changing contexts; SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts Project andteam Manager member cognition; 1. Workflow visualization asameansofoffloading coordination techniques are revealed, including: Several ofthisparadigm’s most successful team project management problems, even oncomplex projects. to theirdemonstrated to avoid ability historical project isgrowingIPD adoptionofthesepractices rapidly due coordination, work-state signaling, andteam focus. arepractices basedonaparadigm ofdecentralized inform effective collaboration onIDRprojects. These aparadigm whichcould underwent shift practices Near thebeginning ofthe21stcentury, IPDbest communication andsocialinteractions. ofinterpersonal scalingnetwork and ageometrically was focused onthegeneration ofnewanalyses and at two datathon events.and observations Each event explored. Data were using surveys, collected interviews, creativity facilitating interactions was additionally and organizational members’ traits. The content of perceived to facilitate creativity, creative outcomes, to examine the relationship between interactions expertise. This studytakesamixed methodapproach requires collaboration between individualswithdiverse The engagement withcomplex problems often Authors: Teis andMatthew M.Kristensen Weber Development at Datathons Paper 5: “That’s Collaboration agoodpoint”: &Idea predefined process frameworks. existing standards/procedures, andmisapplication of common pitfallssuchas “tool overload,” disruptionof years ofIPDfield experience, isprovided for avoiding Guidance inapplyingthesetechniques, gainedfrom 20 from outsidetheproject. responsiveness, bothamongsttheteam membersand 3. Feedback loops/cadence for and better visibility models, andmanagetime/cost; and productivity, facilitate formation ofteam shared mental work2. Bounded to reduce increase multitasking, Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 55 1:30 pm Zouwen, Wim van Vierssen and Peter Van Den Besselaar Van and Peter Vierssen van Wim Zouwen, networks in a global Understanding professional of a is importantcontext the development for Little is known knowledge infrastructure. collaborative and network associations of professional about the role of interactions in the organization organizations in a knowledge-intensive field. Whereas, scientists scientists Whereas, in a knowledge-intensive field. of personal their social capital in the form contribute capital, economic contribute firms network contacts, to in order contracts consulting and legal guidance, of diverse sources these and protect utilize, locate, firms these biopharmaceutical While knowledge. the intellectual propertyown they do not end up through these social network ties created “owning” Because knowledge of problem-solving. pragmatic expertise many tacit and because often remains others’ boundary-spanning team from network ties stem individual problem-at-hand, the predate that affiliations these informal over control exertscientists greater networks. network organizations of intermediate role The 2: Paper networks: Exploratory analysis collaboration in creating as a association professional of an international heuristic device Marielle der Horlings, van Edwin Wen, Bei Authors: members’ traits, such as openness to experience and experience to such as openness traits, members’ impact had a limited on the motivation, intrinsic Trust interactions. facilitating of creativity formation as important identified for were of safety and a feeling creativity. facilitated that of interactions the formation with others as an on interactions saw Participants know-opportunity idea feedback, technical receive to knowledge different from and gage relevance how, domains. boundariesneeded expertise organizational across Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 4 Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: science, and fields; I examine how the context of context the examine how and fields; I science, industrythe biopharmaceutical scientists’ shapes much- and access evaluate, aware, ability become to biopharmaceutical scientists, project managers and scientists, biopharmaceutical team theories of social capital, Using project leaders. organization. To understand how these collaborations these collaborations understand how To organization. I types operate, organizational different between conducted 39 in-depth interviews 34 industrial with faculty, key opinion leaders, or industry key opinion leaders, consultants faculty, or teams the boundaries of the focal beyond located companies utilize teams of Ph.D.s from a range a range from of Ph.D.s teams utilize companies some obstacles require so, Even of disciplines. with university and coordinating communicating projects reach the marketplace. Even successful successful Even the marketplace. projects reach challenges. seriousprojects scientific experience biopharmaceutical with these challenges, cope To and uncertainty. Biopharmaceutical research and research Biopharmaceutical and uncertainty. – only about 2% of is no exception development allowing access to new knowledge, social networks new knowledge, to access allowing arise; innovative But problems creativity. facilitate rates failure high often by characterized are areas Research into the innovative process often stress the often stress process the innovative into Research of boundary-spanningcontribution By network ties. Research and Development Research J Mcbee David Authors: Paper 1: Communicating Across Organizational Organizational Across 1: Communicating Paper of Biopharmaceutical Boundaries in the Context relationship exists between creativity facilitating facilitating creativity between exists relationship Organizational outcomes. and creative interactions modeling. Observations collected modeling. and interviews were using a analyzed and were events the datathon at a find that results The theory grounded approach. participants’ communication patterns. The surveyThe patterns. communication participants’ graph random using exponential analyzed were data software by researcher from multiple disciplines. multiple disciplines. from researcher software by collect on the used to network data Surveys were Government And Industry, Academia, Across Collaborations Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 56 Collaborative) Collaborative isapartnership (The Developed in2013, The College &University Research research to address challenges. state specificpolicy thatdevelop networks leverage knowledge academic colleges anduniversities, to offers auniqueopportunity its smallgeographic size, and11publicprivate toperspectives determine solutions. Island, Rhode with and complex, requiring diverse knowledge, and skills, across multipleareas. These challengesare dynamic The State Islandfaces complex ofRhode challenges Authors: Amber Caulkins Lessons from Developing Network aKnowledge Paper 4:EstablishingaStatewide Research Initiative: collaboration.efficient cross-boundary From thiswe may understandbetter theconditions for ofprofessionalsvariety otherthanonlyresearchers. to thisthe understandingofcollaboration between a collaboration between researchers, andthisstudyadds collaboration. Previous research focused mainlyon andcross-sectoralto engage incross-discipline what motivations makeresearchers andpractitioners today’s grand challenges, thequestionbecomes to collaboration tackle cross-boundary isnecessary If Zouwen, Edwin andPeter Horlings Van Besselaar Den Authors: Bei Wen, Wim van Vierssen, van der Marielle collaboration Paper 3:Motivations behindcross-boundary various groups professionals inthewater domain. analyzing theco-attendance behavior amongthe heterogeneous formation. network This isdoneby International Water Association (IWA) to explore specialist groups, andthematic programs) from the this approach, we useattendance data (conference, databases. outofbibliometric contrastnetworks In to studies are co-authorship builtuponthescholarly search for andestablishinteractions. existing Most aboutthewaysless isknown inwhichindividuals between industry, science, andgovernment andeven SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts consensus-based questionsrelated to pressing, input from state government leadersto determine Using aunique process, The Collaborative seeks education. justice, criminal municipalservices, and services, regional competitiveness, andculture, social arts to healthcare, energy, workforce, manufacturing, teams. Research have projects explored issuesrelated interdisciplinary campuses, including11multi-campus with65researchersworking from across disciplinesand Collaborative hasdeveloped 39research projects, academic research andpublicpolicy. To date, The resourcesknowledge to improve between connections state andoffers apromising model for coordinating between all11institutionsofhighereducation inthe and interdisciplinary teams.and interdisciplinary collaborations that includestakeholders, researchers, andmeaningful statewide networks knowledge project, willprovide valuable insights for developing and recommendations for phaseofthe thenext Lessonsand policymakers. from learned thisevaluation, program andits’ ontheresearch impact community (2016). The evaluation assessesthepilotphaseof was completed inthethird year ofimplementation using bothquantitative andqualitative measures that This presentation willshare findingsfrom anevaluation academia. complexclarify information for audiences outsideof editorial anddata visualization resources that helpto throughout research development, project including Collaborative provides withstrategic faculty support teams.including cross-campus, interdisciplinary The research approaches that bestaddress thesequestions, Islandto develop withinRhode works with faculty challenges. policy state-level The Collaborative then Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 57 3:15-4:45 pm 3:15-4:45 pm

Authors: Jennifer H. Garvin,W Smith, Charnetta Jennifer Authors: Michael A. and Laura Weir Charlene R Virani, Salim Brown, Petersen Abstracts

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Amanda Vogel, Kara Hall, Anne Heberger Marino, Suzanne Christen and Damayanthi Ranwala and Damayanthi Suzanne Christen Marino, Heberger Kara Anne Hall, Vogel, Amanda

: Thematic Session 2 Thematic Thematic Session 1 Thematic Universities And Panel: Seeding And Watering New Cross-Disciplinary Collaborations: Approaches From Funders Funders From Approaches Cross-Disciplinary New Collaborations: Watering Seeding And Panel: mental models and network metrics are used to advance collaborations and scientific initiatives, and evaluate and evaluate initiatives, and scientific collaborations advance used to models and network metricsmental are success. Dr. Kara Hall of the US National Cancer Institute (NCI) will highlight innovative approaches used by the NCI and used by approaches Institute innovative will highlight (NCI) Kara Cancer Hall of the US National Dr. how talk will highlight This projects. research and novel new teams Kingdom generate United to Research Cancer has stimulated new interdisciplinary research collaborations through theme-based scientific retreats, speed- theme-based through retreats, collaborations scientific new interdisciplinary research has stimulated and findings. approaches evaluation and will share networking, and pilot project awards, cancer research. This talk will highlight approaches used to bridge disciplines. used to approaches talk will highlight This research. cancer CTSA the University’s will describe how of the Medical of South Ranwala University Carolina Damayanthi Dr. Suzanne Christen, JD, of the Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) will describe a recent collaboration between Stand Stand between collaboration (IAS) will describe Study a recent Advanced of the Institute for JD, Suzanne Christen, clinical advance to teams Science cross-disciplinary and fund stimulate and IAS to Cancer Convergence Up to initiative bringing together over 2000 scholars and professionals from across fields and disciplines in conferences, conferences, fields and disciplines in across from 2000 scholars and professionals over together bringing initiative science. high-risk, advance to high-reward and seed grants pre-conference tutorials, by their institutions to launch innovative cross-cutting collaborations. launch innovative their institutions to by will describe Initiative its 13 year Keck Futures of Sciences Marin, Academies Heberger of the National Anne Dr. Dr. Amanda L. Vogel of Leidos Biomed will provide an overview of key goals and challenges in seeding, watering, watering, an overview of key goals and challenges in seeding, provide Biomed will of Leidos Vogel L. Amanda Dr. used the varied approaches highlighting panel, the cross-disciplinary and introduce and growing teams, science applied a range of approaches to advance these goals. Panelists will describe sandpits, conferences, preconference preconference conferences, will describe sandpits, Panelists these goals. advance to of approaches applied a range success, for strategies transferable will highlight They speed networking, and funding approaches. tutorials, approaches. and evaluation lessons learned, these teams develop, launch, and sustain innovative collaborative research initiatives. This panel highlights how how panel highlights This initiatives. research collaborative and sustain innovative launch, develop, these teams successfully have with varying of resources, levels and universities, funders set of public and private a diverse Authors of new boundary-crossing the creation and help teams stimulate science to in approaches interest is strong There SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Paper 1: Use of Theoretic Frameworks and Models to and Models to Frameworks Theoretic of 1: Use Paper to Technology of Health Information Inform Design Primary Care VA in of Heart Failure Treatment Support Approaches Evaluation And Technologies New Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 58 provider’ssupport clinical needsandworkflow. our work onclinicalcontent andcommunication to frameworks, approach, focused inatransdisciplinary workOur illustrates from theuseof constructs theoretic tool to assistthem. decision support care teams, andto develop andassessaprototype wesupported, were ableto identify challengesfacing toDue theframeworks andtheinteractions they practices. and facilitators oftheadoption ofbetablockertitration different team membersjointly conceptualize barriers specialists.factors The PARiHS framework helped content amongtheinformatics, clinical, andhuman facilitated communication aboutworkflow andclinical information needs. model The socio-technical researchers to communicate aboutprovider’s a frame ofreference for cliniciansandhumanfactors interactions. For example, theCabana modelprovided The theoretic frameworks contributed to ourteam care providers, clinicalpharmacists, andnurses. assessments (UA)subsequent usability withprimary to inform Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) and interviews complete ourwork. We usedthetheoretic frameworks of the Department Veterans(VA) Affairs resources to We were team using adistributed, primarily virtual facilitation inclinicalpractice. framework identifies the role ofevidence, context, and (PARiHS) onResearchAction inHealthServices workflow, andorganizational culture. The Promoting technology addresses includingclinicalcontent, factors modelforThe socio-technical healthinformation knowledge, attitudes, andbehavior constraints. our work. The Cabana modelidentifies clinician We usedtheoretic frameworks andmodelsto inform failure.patients withheart care teams to improveprimary betablockertitration for researchers, designed acommunication mechanism for care providers, informatics andhumanfactors team, ofcardiologists, primary multi-disciplinary Our SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts analysis of digital trace data from andindirect thedirect created by scientific teams.Our hypothesis isthat the throughdiscovery theanalysis ofthedigital trace data that allow usto identify andmeasure thepace of scientific teams.Our research goalis to develop metrics andachievement objective for isanimportant often Discovery, thegainingofnewinsight orunderstanding, Kieliszewski Authors: Laura Anderson andCheryl Scientific Teams Paper 2: The Use ofDigital Trace Data to Examine affiliates, orthe U.S. Government. are notnecessarily theviews ofthe VA, theiracademic 037 funding. Views expressed are oftheauthorsand This research by the was supported VA, HSRD CRE12- of team science evaluation methods. andcould beusedtothey work, augment thescience methods to gather data empirical ofscience teams as of theircollective activity. These approaches provide feedback to enhance andaugment theirunderstanding benefit thescientific teams by providing reflective activity.discovery oftheanalytical outputcan Results changes incomputer application usagerelated to around events, discovery vocabulary andobservable conversation across phases, project emergence ofnew patterns ofsocialinteraction and include varying andchangesintopics. findings on vocabulary Our withafocus artifacts, withinproject text unstructured andthematicand textual analyses and ofstructured of communication channelssuchasemailorSlack; analysisand computing system logs;socialnetworking including: trace ethnography ofmeetingtranscripts digital trace data from work thedirect ofscience teams We usemultiplemethodsinourstudiesto analyze the suchaspapersand presentations.and shared artifacts social exchanges, tools andtechnology usagelogs, meeting conversations, written communication and (Figure 1).Digital trace data sources includetranscribed and theemergenceinto ofdiscovery team activity ofscientificproducts provides practices work insight Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 59 3:15-4:45 pm disciplines because access to datasets have been have datasets to disciplines because access the door to open of datasets releases Recent limited. these answers. explore disciplines how examined have researchers Previous Newman (2001, 2004) patterns. collaboration in differ field. The development of a self-scoring sheet for sheet of a self-scoring The development field. is the nextthis assessment phase of providing understanding for with usable tool scientists team knowledge in collaboration to related motivations In addition, this practical will teams. tool producing building team for be developed to strategies for allow Lastly, teams. and assembling developing useful to (in platform a digital bases for sheet is the the scoring will serve point that as a mobile access development) as portal as well continue in which to the MATRICx for with the MATRICx the collection associated of data project. important is therefore scientists two between distance) we However, projects. startingfor new collaborative connected within are scientists do not know well how Results. Several iterations have contributed to the the to contributed have iterations Several Results. maps scale that of a self-scoring development collaboration individual participantfor motivators and along experience of collaborative against degree functioning a graphical in the domains of collaborative establish to and teams individuals usable by context motivation. and depth of collaborative the degrees sheet provides The self-scoring Summary findings. of of the advancement technological the basis for as a mobile and promoted be designed to tool MATRICx collect for and to data teams use by for application framework graphical self-scoring The further research. will be used as part of the development of the technical mobile application. MATRICx the SciTS advances the research of how Statement Abstracts

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 3 Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Often, projects start new research when scientists mentors, make connections among their advisors, Understanding the connectivityand co-authors. (e.g., Collaboration in science is important for improving the is important in science improving for Collaboration of research. and reproducibility quality, productivity, is your world? is your and Elizabeth Novoa Daniel Acuna Authors: Paper 1: Author connectivity big 1: Author how within disciplines: Paper of motivators and threats which make up the MATRICx up the MATRICx which make and threats of motivators 2016). (Mallinson et al., framework from 150 participants. Items were analyzed applying analyzed 150 participants. Itemsfrom were 3.80.1 Winsteps® Rascha 1-parameter model using a hierarchy provided analysis data 2013). Pilot (Linacre, was used to investigate the rating scale structure, scale structure, the rating investigate used to was responses fit of and person-item unidimensionality, teams (Lotrecchiano et al., 2016). This list informed list informed This 2016). et al., (Lotrecchiano teams a representing of 55 indicators the development Rasch spectrum analysis of collaboration. hierarchical collaboration that were developed into 6 domains of into developed were that collaboration functioning in health and biomedical collaborative Methods. A review of the team science literature was was literature science of the team A review Methods. to and deterrents a list of motivators compile used to Integration, and Collaboration (MATRICx) instrument for for instrument (MATRICx) and Collaboration Integration, in team use the tool to be able to individuals and teams reflectionmaintenance. and Objective. To develop a translational self-scoring sheet self-scoring a translational develop To Objective. Readiness, Team for Assessment the Motivation for Alexandra Rosenberg, Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Lisa Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J. Rosenberg, Alexandra Schwartz Liu and John Collaboration (MATRICx) Collaboration Mallinson, Trudy Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Authors: Paper 3: A Self-Scoring 3: A the Motivation Mechanism for Paper and Integration, Readiness, Team for Assessment Network Analysis Through Insights Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 60 Grauwin andPablo Jensen Authors: Heisawn Jeong, Lund, Kristine Sebastian Researcher inEducational Networks Research Paper 2:Comparing Bibliographic with Maps amongthem. connections how teams ofscientists may beformed basedon based onfieldsofstudy. These results shedlight on create systems to automatically suggestcollaborators We willexplore ideasfor future work where we can Sciences =6.45withPhysics andAstronomy =5.2). minimum distance (compare Agricultural andBiological previous findingsthat thesciences have relatively high 0.52, p=0.02,respectively). results Our coincide with distance within fields(r(18)=0.52,p0.02,andr(18) and thelogofnumberpaperswithaverage correlation between thelogofnumberauthors (Newman, 2001),we confirm that there isasignificant has thehighest(6.75).Similarto previous studies average distance (3.41,Fig 1B)whereas Engineering only 2.2%oftheauthors(Fig. 1A), hastheshortest field, withasmallshare of that theMultidisciplinary frequent fieldofpublication perauthor. We found 19 fields(Fig. 1AandB) computed themost million authorsand25articles. We analyzed Science disciplineclassification, containing 16.9 Graph (Sinhaetal., 2015),matched to the Web of this question,we Academic analyzed theMicrosoft with significant differences across fields. Toanswer hypothesis isthat scientists are but closelyconnected differencesconnectivity across disciplines.Our The ofthiswork purpose isto understandauthor been relatively smallinscale. the course ofdecades. However, thesestudieshave collaborations between appliedandbasicsciences in countries andCoccia and Wang (2016)found stronger found strong patterns ofcollaboration across BRICS path. Finardi byconnected ashort andBuratti (2016) a “small world” pattern, where two scientists are Research, Physics, andComputer Science exhibit found that scientific collaborations inBiomedical SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts We for lookedat how agiven authors/participants 12 Divisionsand155SIGs(SignificantInterest Groups). EducationalAmerican Research Association (AERA) with capturednetworks inthe 2005annualmeetingof 2015). We thencompared thismapwithresearcher of18clustersnetwork (Lund, Jeong, Grauwin &Jensen, 2000-2004 ineducational research, whichresulted ina inScopus publishedfrom coupling on36,715articles research communities. We bibliographic firstperformed maps formed by shared citations mapinto human study, we examined theextent that bibliographic as professional membership(Longino, this 2013).In to such humanpractices subject is ahumanpractice insciencepractices (Grauwin &Jensen,2011).Citation commonly usedto understandtheshapeofresearch Bibliographic analyses basedoncitation data are research ofthefields. networks on how citation may influence andbeinfluenced by straightforward, andwe needto continue to reflect bibliographic andresearcher networks isnot networks cluster boundaries. The relationship between presenting, andpublishingtheirresearch across are dissemination, citing, alsoagents ofknowledge professional organizations,join particular researchers cite specific references, journals, and publish in certain associations may prompt andguideresearchers to weak matches together indicate that whiledisciplinary educational research community. strong Both and whilelarge,AERA, doesnotfullyrepresent theglobal to oneyear ofconference addition, In participation. data asfive years ofcluster authorship was compared which islikelyto bedueto thelimited scope ofthe networks. The match was notasstrong inothercases, that bibliographic clusters are relevant to researcher of theclusters Division/SIGs, andAERA suggesting clusters. Strong matches were found between some relative size (interms ofauthors)eachthese between different clusters, into account taking the Division/SIGsponsoredAERA sessionswere distributed Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 61 = 0.153, p < .001). Betweenness is only significantly = 0.153, p < .001). Betweenness is only significantly individuals can be that with SOC implying correlated lack of co- network despite in the institute’s central between associations study demonstrates The location. co-location,spatial SOC, and social networks. socio-physical perceptions of the workplace. The overall overall The of the workplace. perceptions socio-physical co-located 39% (N=152) and 53% for was rate response on 1 item the Part symmetrized We (N=66). scientists a network that frequencyinteraction and generated variables (DVs): dependent three create used to was a nodes directly or number of connected to degree or number of distinct individual; two-step reach given and of a specific individual; steps individuals within two individual falls on often a given or how betweenness the shortest other pairs of individuals. between paths on 2 item a Part were (IVs) variables independent The unit, the sense of community (SOC) in an individual’s linear regressions ran each DV we and co-location. For account To affiliation. organizational for controlling impacting potentially networks building layouts for the standard clustered we or sense of community, correlated significantly SOC was building. by errors (β = 0.00862, p < .01) and betweenness with degree higher had scientists (β = 0.00206, p < .05). Co-located (β (β = 0.0339, p < .01) and two-step reach degree Paper 4: The Associations between Social Networks, Social between Networks, Associations The 4: Paper Among Co-Location and Sense of Community, Scientists Policy Healthcare Kabo Felichism Authors: the analyze exploratory goal of our to study was The of social networks sense of community with association (SOC) co-location. and spatial Our was study sample policy healthcare formed for an institute at scientists than more from scientists together bringing in 2011 by of the 40% In 2012, around units. university 20 different complex. research a large at co-located was institute a two-part administered survey 2014 to We in late 21 plus (125 co-located) 390 scientists the institute’s Part focused 1 affiliates. of non-university employees on 2 focused and Part with colleagues, on interactions Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: namely, through enlarging and enriching individuals’ and enriching individuals’ enlarging through namely, ego networks. grant-seeking unidentified mechanisms by which the mechanisms unidentified can have CTSA productivity, research an impact on investigators’ investigators’ ego networks. This has major implications has major implications This ego networks. investigators’ the individual at change patterns collaboration how for It potentially indicates also and institutional levels. The difference in TRS score between the two groups groups the between two TRS score in difference The suggesting the CTSA with time, has institute increased impacts positive medium- and long-term on significant .019). In 2012 Group A had a significantly much larger larger much A had a significantly .019). In 2012 Group (meanA – meanB = 145.68 p < .001). TSR in increase between Group A and Group B (meanA – meanB = B (meanA Group A and Group between A had a significantly -4.50, p = .707). In 2010 Group p = (meanA – meanB = 23.33, TSR in increase larger change in TSR in the post-treatment years 2008, 2010, 2008, years in the post-treatment TSR change in difference no significant was and 2012. In 2008 there one-tailed t-tests to examine the hypothesis that Group Group that one-tailed the hypothesis examine to t-tests With time. over TSR in increase a greater have A would analyzed we 2005 as the baseline (pre-treatment), sample had two groups: Group A (N = 176) interacted A (N = 176) interacted Group groups: sample had two with the CTSA, had no B (N = 1,985) and Group sample independent ran We with the CTSA.interaction the importance of ‘weak’ ties (friends of friends) with ‘weak’ the importance of The study and knowledge flows. information respect to co-submissions and generated the ego network co-submissions and generated (TSR) two-step reach measure – number of nodes which assesses steps, within two can be reached that was consultation with the CTSA institute in 2006. We We with the CTSA consultation was in 2006. institute proposal networks based on grant investigator created research proposals to external sponsors in the year external to sponsors in the year proposals research submissions collected grant We 2006 (N = 2,161). the treatment the period 2002-2012 where for data whether they consulted with the CTSA with the whether they consulted institute. who submitted investigators Our study sample was The goal of our study was to examine differences differences examine to study was goal of our The ego networks based on investigators’ between Investigators at a Large Research University Research a Large at Investigators Kabo Mashour and George Felichism Authors: Paper 3: The Effect of a Clinical and Translational Translational and of a Clinical Effect The 3: Paper Networks Institute of Ego on the Science Award Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 Translational HealthResearch 62 organizational structures, andphilanthropic agility. also introduced: research businessmodels, translational underrepresented incurrent research strategies) are Additional areas ofemerging strategic attention (yet (1) pursuitofexcellence, and(2)strategic stewardship. along theseelements isguidedby two strands:thinking research teams, and (6)research AMC partnerships. (3) research organizations, (4)research focus areas, (5) research faculty, (2) research infrastructure andspace, strategic elements are outlinedintheframework: (1) help inform theirfuture strategic priorities. Sixcommon shared understandingoftheircurrent positionand developed toward to helpleadershipandfaculty a will introduce a “research strategy DNA” framework With aneye toward team science, thepresentation attention andfinancial resources. align orcompete withteam science for organizational that mayconsidering otherinstitutionalpriorities by providing theaudience withaholisticcontext for the presentation willhelpto advance theSciTSfield team science emerges in AMC research strategic plans, experiences. While highlighting theplaces where research strategic plansandtheauthors’ related at AMCs, aframework developed from areview of aboutresearchfor thinking strategies andpriorities presentation willshare arecently-published framework other strategic research enterprise priorities. This one ofmany elements withinacomplex array of andincreasing.important Butteam science isjust and research-intensive schoolsofmedicine—are academicmedicalcenters (AMCs)science—within focusInstitutional on,andinvestment in,team Authors: Haley Rand Academic Centers Medical Paper 1: Team ScienceasaStrategic Research at Priority Thematic 4 Session SciTS 2017Conference:

Abstracts

Seminar that convenes a cross-disciplinary community that community convenesSeminar across-disciplinary Washington University (C3@GWU) isaUniversity Creating aCulture ofCollaboration at George WatkinsRyan JuliaStorberg-WalkerL McDonald, ShaliniMisra, and Authors: R.Lotrecchiano, Gaetano Cleary, Sean Paige Think Tanks andAims Washington University (C3@GWU): University Seminar Paper 2:Creating aCulture ofCollaboration at George 2. Explore key topical areas to critical scientific culture at GWU. generate agendasfor increating action acollaborative beyond discourse and GWUto foster cross-disciplinary key contributors andstakeholders from throughout and communities tanks”)1. Assemble (“think knowledge of Objectives: C3@GWU Seminar • • • • • • mechanisms ofscientific collaboration at GWabout: term agendasanddiscussionsthat emphasize the stakeholders. andlong C3@GWUwillgenerate short GWU, regional institutes, andfederal government communities tanks”) (“think knowledge represent topics that foster collaborative science. C3@GWU to explore andaddress andexperts national partners collaboration themwithregional andconnects and interested faculty inissuesrelatedof expert to scientific Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. gender boundaries inscience.gender boundaries Issues related to crossing cultural, ethnic, and activities, Faculty reward andrecognition for collaborative and collaboration forRequired organizational team science supports informetrics Technologies for collaboration and scholarship team effectivenessMeasuring Developing andeducating team scientists

3:15-4:45pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 63 5:00-6:00 pm by which to better understand the nature and role of and role understand the nature better which to by science. ethics in team effective in ethics has analyzed work Much previous ethical decision-making of cultivating the at strategies projects leaned on Kohlbergian- Those individual level. moral of individual psychological based instruments While assess ethical development. to development presentation will conclude with links to free resources resources free with links to will conclude presentation and open funding opportunities. working individuals together involves science Citizen not only quandaries, scientific and solve identify to disciplines but often scientific individuals across from whose expertise lies outside of the realms and training can easily be science citizen In this way, of science. greatest with the team science defined as the ultimate impact The of citizen teams. across discipline diversity be to has the potential on the study of SciTS science as these be assessed to continue and will need to great and change. methods develop In this science. of team an understudied component strategy research outline a novel we presentation, collaborators and partners in the research process and partnersprocess collaborators in the research been used these methods have Over the years itself. ecology, such as ornithology, in disciplines prolifically use Their astronomy. and meteorology, oceanography, recent. more is far in biomedical research the benefits and barriers will examine presentation This methods open innovation to incorporating specific perspective, a federal from biomedical research into into public feedback implemented NIH has and how Some include of benefits examples its approaches. than would data and insight of more the acquisition approaches possible using conventional been have solve of the public to and harnessing the creativity of barriers examples include and a few problems, the securityprotecting and privacy of personal health The implementation. to delays and bureaucratic data Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 1 Thematic Ethics And Integrity In Team Science Science Team Integrity And Ethics In SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: for team science due to the communicative, the communicative, due to science team for differences and foundational methodological, ethics is yet And cultures. science among disparate Ethical decision-making, (i.e. the cognitive and affective and affective the cognitive decision-making, (i.e. Ethical of understanding and acting components in situations is especially challenging salience), moral of complex Authors: Jonathan Beever and Mark Beever Hannah Jonathan Authors: Paper 1: Ethical Foundations in Team Science Settings Team in Foundations 1: Ethical Paper the research or advisors to the research but as direct the research or advisors to the research officers from across the NIH, defines as science the NIH, defines citizen from across officers to approach a collaborative set of methods a complex not just as subjects the public, of involving research methods. The NIH Citizen Science Working Group, a Group, Working Science NIH Citizen The methods. 50 program of over comprised group interest research and other methods of open innovation in biomedical and other methods of open innovation the National with an emphasis on how research, Institutes of Health (NIH) supports open innovation This presentation will serve as a state-of-the-science presentation This crowdsourcing, overview science, on the use of citizen Look at Public Participation in Biomedical Research Participation Public at Look Authors: Katrina Theisz at the GW department, school, and university levels. the GW department,at levels. university and school, A Science: Team Ultimate The Science- 3: Citizen Paper 5. Disseminate key products and create knowledge- key products and create 5. Disseminate activity collaborative will enhance that sharing events and activities and decision- leadership university to GWU collaborative empowering for makers responsible science. growing culture of collaboration at GWU. GWU. at of collaboration culture growing policies, protocols, and team collaborative 4. Propose 3. Examine critical areas of academic and organizational organizational of academic and 3. Examine critical areas a functioning will strengthen that collaborative collaboration within and beyond the GWU scholarly the and beyond within collaboration community. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 64 Fletcher andStephen Zaccaro Authors: Samantha Dubrow, Laura Richard Klimoski, Science Multiteam Systems Paper Promoting 2:Holdingitalltogether: in Integrity actions. enculturation effects individual values and disciplinary ethics inteam science butalsoto the ways inwhich science bothindrawing attention to therole of This research hassignificance for thescience of team plan to studythem. thatand thetheories guidethemandoutlinearesearch this presentation,In we’ll develop thesehypotheses withinteams.of communication anddecision-making Further, thesedifferences play a role intheeffectiveness in whichmembersofdisciplinesare enculturated. exist between disciplinesprecisely becauseoftheways we propose that foundational normative differences effectively in team or group science settings.Second, and decreases researchers’ abilitiesto collaborate exacerbates differences inindividual value perspectives First, enculturation we thinkthat disciplinary To we pursuethiswork, posetwo related hypotheses. the cultures andcontexts ofgroup settings. values, andthat thesevalues are reflectively shaped by isorientated,character implicitly, or norms to particular foundationalists whoargue that theindividuals’ ethical we propose drawing oncharacter-based work ofmoral and individualisticmodelofethicaldecision-making, alternative to what hasbecome astandard rationalistic stages ofindividualformation withindisciplines. As an may differdecision-making across disciplinesand at team research strategy to studytheways that ethical response,In we have developed amultidisciplinary ofteam-based science.increasing importance had onteam science. This isasignificant gap, given the thesevariations in STEMdisciplinesandwhat impact differeddecision-making amongst groups collaborating questions arose asto how andto what extent ethical at theindividuallevel,ethical decision-making central this approach enhanced researchers’ understandingof SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts in scaleandscope (Zaccaro, Marks, &DeChurch, brought together to solve problems that are significant of teams, innature, interdisciplinary often that are ofmultiteam systems (MTSs),part whichare groups in scientific collective research where scientists are 2016). & Nilsson, These issueswillbeexacerbated Edwards &Roy, Fors, 2017;Martensson, Wallin, Zander, teams (e.g., inmultidisciplinary scientists participating for research quality. These issuesare faced often by to replicateinability findingsorstatistical standards ownership,claims to property intellectual andthe aspromised,including failure to disputed perform and plagiarism to includemore nuanced ones, begun to beyond extend examples ofdata fabrication exponentially inthelastten years. The issueshave Concerns around research integrity have grown Authors: John Walsh, You-Na Lee and Li Tang PaperMisconduct 3:DivisionofLaborand Scientific promote insuch collectives. to bestructured setting, andissuesoffree agency--can management, ethicalleadership,boundary norm assembly process andMTS governance--including may inscience arise MTSs, we aimto discusshow the to2004). Due thesepotential issuesofintegrity that and down to eachcomponent teams (Trevino &Brown, a failure incommunication ofmoral issuesfor theMTS faire for leadershipstructure theMTS canarise, causing necessarily keepingtheMTS missioninmind. Alaissez- who isfocused mostlyontheirteam’s mission,without practices. Second, eachteam hasitsown often leader between-team and inethicalnorms commonality precursorlevel to ethicalleadershipisanecessary agiven conclusion. to assert necessary Thus, MTS- publication processes, suchasthelevel ofvalidity disciplines may have different norms for thescientific Luciano, DeChurch, &Mathieu, 2015).Different potentially inethicalstandards (Lotrecchiano, 2013; to inperceived disparities research and practices differentiation between component teams canlead challenges. First, whenmultipleteams come together, 2012). Scientific MTSs may giverise to uniqueethical Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 65 5:00-6:00 pm Paper 2: A Dynamic Ecology of Teams in an Teams 2: A Dynamic of Ecology Paper International Virtual Research What Organization: Productive? Makes Teams Elizabeth Trudeau, IftekharAuthors: Ashley Ahmed, LambertSimpson, Natalie and Marshall Poole Scale in Semi-Arid Regions (ASSAR) project; a five-yearScale in Semi-Arid (ASSAR) Regions multi-disciplinarymulti-country, project that research some of the main barriers and enablers explore seeks to and sustained adaptation widespread effective, to of Africa semi-arid change in regions climate to paper starts The ASSAR onto mapping by and Asia. to describe often used are that frameworks different such boundary-spanning consortia, as such research transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaborations, emerging frameworks and of practice, communities It scholars. then moves science of team science from a range from emerged discuss the learning that on to were and staff members that of ASSAR researchers ASSAR’s through 2016, halfway surveyed in late lessons It emerging highlighting duration. by ends preliminary recommendations and provides date to consideration be taken into need to issues that around multi-site large and implementing when designing collaborations. interdisciplinary research displacement, and therefore should increase the increase should therefore and displacement, on Based size. team net of retraction, of probability and 506 paired sample of 263 retracted a matched indicators develop we not retracted, were papers that a produced that labor in the team of the division of retractions is higher as of rate the paper and find that even size), (net of team increases the division of labor retractions. effect on has a negative size though team discussion of the implications with a conclude We in particularfor policy, for science of these findings projects. science team organizing Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 2 Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: transaction costs and a challenging integration process. process. integration transaction and a challenging costs the learning explore purpose of this paper is to The at the Adaptation through halfway has emerged that institutional and personal capacities, and opposed institutional and personal capacities, large also entails disciplines and local contexts, regions and reflect a more systemic and integrated and integrated systemic and reflect a more regions working However, understanding of the issues. different time zones, several across collaboratively this collaborative research model holds the potential model holds the potential research this collaborative multiple can be applied to that yield unique insights to framework as yet to describe them, or to help harvest describe them, or to to as yet framework of process in the complex emerging are the lessons that that Some argue projects such as these. implementing these projects transdisciplinary compare and others is no clear there of practice, communities them to consortia are being funded to address wicked problems wicked problems consortia address funded to being are in the socio-ecological climate such as around realm, some call While change and sustainable development. An increasing number of large multi-partner, multi-partner, number of large increasing An inter-disciplinary distributed, geographically research trenches Scodanibbio Lucia Authors: Paper 1: Collaborative, multi-geography multi-geography 1: Collaborative, Paper the early lessons from interdisciplinary research: division of labor reduces the ability members of team division of labor reduces coordination work, increases each other’s monitor to goal to lead and may problems and communication team size may reduce retraction likelihood due to more more likelihood due to retraction reduce may size team greater and checkingpeople monitoring the results, division of labor that is associated with larger team team with larger is associated division of labor that scientific be a key factor to contributing may size larger While retractions. misconduct associated and the there has been an increase in the rate of retractions of retractions in the rate has been an increase there in the increase that We argue of published findings. Science is increasingly a team activity, and the size and the size activity, a team increasingly Science is same time, the At growing. has been of the teams International, Large-Scale Distributed Teams Teams Large-ScaleInternational, Distributed Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 66 oftheteams overand productivity time. Using content continents. We track thecomposition, focus project with 46different institutionalaffiliations across four from 2010to 2016that includes 217participants Organization that hasgenerated seventy nineprojects anInternational Computing Research (JLESC), Virtual development teams intheJoint Labfor Scale Extreme ofresearch and productivity and participants, This casestudylooksinto development, project overstructures timeto fullyrealize thisvalue. to andteam studydynamicsandchangesinnetworks measures ofshared leadership” (p.1), there isaneed and measures ascompared to aggregate and theories “relative value ofemploying theories socialnetwork Mathieu, and Kukenberger (2016)argue for the changing environment. Although D’Innocenzo, contribute to ourunderstandingofteams inthis basedapproachA network could significantly Woolley, 2011). team membership over time(O’Leary, & Mortensen, methodology to understandtheeffects ofmultiple Haas, 2012,p. 316). The scenario callsfor innovative number ofotherteams concurrently” (Cummings & for teams whosemembersallocate timeto agreater team, but surprisingly, isalsohigher performance allocate agreater oftheirtimeto thefocal proportion ishigherfor teamsperformance whosemembers organizations, research shows that, “at theteam level, work inmultinational Considering knowledge-intensive 2012; Tannenbaum, Mathieu, Salas, &Cohen, 2012). (Wageman,Gardner, team effectiveness Mortensen, & became significant inunderstanding teams and factors geographic dispersionandmultipleteam membership and collaboration hasbeenrapidly changing and However, thenature ofteams, team environment, Gardner,clear (Wageman, 2012). &Mortensen, defined andeffectivenesscriteria are somewhat leadership, purposes, are andboundaries well Mathieu, Salas, & Cohen, 2012)where membership, andteam-organization alignment (Tannenbaum,task, focuses ontheinteractions amongteam experience, Traditional research onorganizational teams primarily SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts through three keymoments initsdevelopment to thesuccess inCanada ofaresearch partnership Paper 3:Examination ofprocesses that contributed engineering productivity. the role among teams ofnetworks onscientific and the Cummings and Hassfindingsandalso to illuminate the potential to shedlight ontheparadox raised by to otherteams, theproductive itis. The results have more productive; and(3) ateamThe has more linkages more productive; (2) Teams that persistover timeare who are more are network central intheparticipation intheteams:to (1) productivity Teams withmembers data that enablesusto test three hypotheses related analysis, analysis, interviews, andnetwork we generate and physical proximity (Lapointe, 2008)isessential, Moreover, abalance distance between critical ifseeking leadership andto provide expertise. organizations are inintellectual asked to participate having fostered development of thisproject. Partner and astrong commitment isseenas by partners, organizations withcommunity research partnership research context and Canada inQuebec that favours et al., 1994). This way ofworking, combined witha major undercurrent intheworld ofresearch (Gibbons ofknowledge, a andthe co-creation promoting action research strategydevelopment ofaparticipatory the themesandissuesto alsoledto prioritize. the It this team helpedto create aconsensus regarding in2008,theanalysis that ledto establishing Starting implementation anditscontinuation over time. key moments inourteam’s development: itsorigin, its assessments, willbeexamined withemphasisonthree hindered it. These processes, brought to light by our aswell asthosethatthat facilitated thisundertaking, stepfamilies, thispresentation highlights theprocesses Science”—dedicated to parental separation and a large, research interdisciplinary partnership—“Team Based onourexperience establishingandmanaging Caroline, Saint-Amand Annick and Turcotte Daniel Authors: Robitaille Saint-Jacques Marie-Christine, Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 67 5:00-6:00 pm new knowledge it should change suggests that that intellectual it should add or subtract direction and that new intellectual with that align better to researchers these make to freedom team’s research The direction. of its additions or subtractions the success is critical to to consequences detrimental have but may research, been added or subtracted. who have the researchers On the continuum of research to development, development, to of research On the continuum is most unpredictable and is the end that research uncertain, in both the timescale and intellectual in the trenches Our experience of its outcomes. content sciences in the physical teams and research of research such teams the focus has been that and engineering a considerable by their tasks must be balanced bring to important of such examples Two of freedom. amount graphic, in the accompanying illustrated are freedom “permeability.” of concept the SciTS to both related gains new • In on the left, the example researcher a knowledge his or her contribution suggests that that one from switching by maximized be better might freedom researcher’s The another. to team research the impact is critical to switch make that of his or to detrimental have but may contribution, her research he or she has team the research to consequences abandoned. gains team • In a research on the right, the example challenge. The presentation will also outline strategies strategies will also outline presentation The challenge. time. over of the team evolution foster used to with the combined strategies, of winning Continuation supportedby nature project of a of a different creation this transition. to contributed have seem to all, The Teams: Development versus 2: Research Paper Focus and Freedom between Balance Delicate Venkatesh Narayanamurti Tsao and Jeff Authors: Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 3 Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: a stable market of attention already exists. We suggest We exists. already a stable market of attention pose challenges for may the decline of small teams that vitalitythe long-term and technology. of science leading large team leaders (and members) to minimize minimize leaders (and members) to team leading large where problems solving prominent the risks of R&D by may be attributable to the economy of science and of science the economy to be attributable may of science funded areas intensely more as technology, teams, small and large between amplify the difference while the work of small teams comes further comes of small teams while the work in the part that show of this difference We all. if at future, solve and refine important ideas from the immediate important the immediate and refine ideas from solve and articles, to patents attention a result, As past. immediate, is more teams large by software produced disrupt the system by drawing inspiration from older from inspiration drawing by disrupt the system build on, teams while larger and less popular ideas, software products, we find remarkably find consistent we software products, more are individuals and small teams that evidence software and articles, that patents produce likely to existing technologies, while smaller teams are built built are while smaller teams technologies, existing represented teamwork them. Analyzing generate to and articles, patents, of millions of research tens by teams generate. We argue that larger teams are better better are teams larger that argue We generate. teams and develop problems existing solve to designed teams in the production of high impactteams and science about whether and questions raises technology and products designs the ideas, influences size how Authors: Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang and James Evans Wang Dashun Wu, Lingfei Authors: eclipsing small are teams large that evidence Recent Paper 1: Small Teams Generate New Directions New in Generate Teams 1: Small Paper Science and Technology learn to work together and develop a shared vision of a shared and develop together work learn to this overcome of these families helped to the situation procedures for research production, governance and production, governance research for procedures to members of knowledgemobilization allow that it includes challenges that can hinder the smooth can hinder the challenges that it includes establishing In partnership. of a operation case, our New Findings On What Leads To Innovation Innovation To Leads What On New Findings Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 68 to linkages shedlight andindirect onthedirect factors. thisliterature STPIstaff conducted review and organizational cultures andnorms, among other such asthenature oftheteam, tasks, industry, societal complex, interacting withmany contextual variables, workforce diversity andinnovation istenuous and studied since the1950s. The relationship between andinnovationorganizational performance have been on innovation. Workforce diversity and itsrole in understand theevidence ofdiversity’s impact (STEM) workforce diversity andinnovation to better science, technology engineering, andmathematics We reviewed thebodyofliterature related to Authors: Vanessa Pena andAsha Balakrishnan ofQuantitativeReview Research Engineering Workforce onInnovation: A anditsImpact Paper 1: The and ofDiversity intheScientific Role distance between patentable inventions andprior Web ofScience, to determine theminimumcitation U.S. patents to inthe 32millionresearch articles We map, 4.8million buildanewknowledge linking Authors: Jones Ahmadpoor andBenjamin Mohammad Prior Scientific Advance Paper 3: The Frontier: Dual Patentable Inventions and oftheteam to itself.can beshifted theinnerworkings in composition andprimacy direction, andintellectual topurposely reduce uncertainty, teams are more stable of thecontinuum, spaces are knowledge narrowed mentioned). For teams towards thedevelopment end and research teams (e.g., just thepermeability ecosystem that facilitate thefreedom ofresearchers must begiven oftheresearch to theproperties towards theresearch endofthecontinuum, primacy we advance thistalk, thethesisthat,In for teams And Diversity In Gender Teams Thematic 4 Session SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts progress, thepatent- bridges thesameindividualoften more recent ofscientific theories and technological model”“linear ofscience. However, consistent with are consistent withsomecore conceptions ofthe across thepaper-patent linkages boundary to-firm connectivity,indirect andtheprevalence ofuniversity- enormously.vary Theconnectivity, findingsofmajority (patents) from thepatent-paper boundary, andfields 3degrees (papers)and2degreesindirect, peaking patents andpapers. Yet are typically thelinkages ofboth citation encompasses network themajority technological progress. We findthat theintegrated long-standing ideasaboutthenature ofscientific and institutions, andindividuals. The canalsoinform metric to characterize fields, ofimpact funders,new typology scientific advances. The distance provides metric a describing statisticaldescribing relationships between workforce We over collected 1,000measures across the63studies attitudes, andbeliefs. 3. Value, differences whichdescribed inpersonalities, and disciplines, and experience (across collaboration industries), networks, (e.g., education, tenure inteams andorganizations, 2. Informational, related suchascharacteristics to skills (e.g., age, gender, andrace/ethnicity), 1. Social, whichincluded demographic characteristics denoted three ofdiversity— types and innovation. Specifically, the workforce literature We definitionsofdiversity adopted wide-ranging studiestofrom ofempirical date. acollection workforce diversity affectsinnovation asunderstood surrounding theprocesses ofwhen,how, andwhy respective domains. withintheir more impactful appearstrikingly boundary paper boundary, andadvances alongthepatent-paper Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

5:00-6:00pm Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 69 Studies of the patterns of research collaborations collaborations of research of the patterns Studies papers often the co-authorship examine of research is planned research The institutes. within and across an exploratory and proof-of-concept social network gender between the relationship investigate to analysis positioning within of researchers’ and the centralities for bibliometric indicators reduces the chance of being the chance reduces bibliometric indicators for the actual of funding amount funded and/or reduces capacity increase to which in turn can reduce secured, impact. output and scientific research understanding of gender dimensions in current The Science- output and impact is undeveloped. research Metrix of new gender- is working on the development publications. on scientific indicators disaggregated will first outline some preliminary presentation This on the participation in scientific results of women co-authorship will then be Men-women publications. same-gender to and compared examined collaboration. regard in differences will highlight presentation The multidisciplinarity team impacts, and to and scientific science. team for implications discuss potential membership of 3: Social of grant network analysis Paper gender and network centralities researchers: university Eriko Fukumoto Authors: Leading research nations are recognizing gender issues recognizing are nations research Leading the throughout gender balance and acting improve to important Although gains have ecosystem. research as equalitybeen made in gender in research—such in and enrolling in the number of women increases and in the professional STEM education, completing in STEM occupations—gender of women engagement These ecosystem. disparities persist in the research the the higher one looks in acute more disparities are hierarchy. professional and promotions for on bibliometricReliance statistics are If women is rising worldwide. competitions in grant their male counterparts to relative a disadvantage at very might then women output, of research in terms scores lower having get stuck in a vicious circle: well Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Authors: Grégoire Côté Grégoire Authors: SciTS 2017 Conference: science: a bibliometric analysis of scientific activity of scientific a bibliometric analysis science: by gender and co-authorship men and women between Paper 2: Collaboration between men and women in men and women between 2: Collaboration Paper to innovation. Based on our findings, we provide we provide Based on our findings, innovation. to in diversity workforce managing for considerations STEM contexts. as task complexity, type of leadership, human resource human resource type of leadership, as task complexity, changed the among others, and industry, practices, relationship and direction of the level significance the presence of certain conditions. Context and a of certain Context the presence conditions. such with other factors, interaction measure’s diversity findings in the literature review also indicated that that review also indicated findings in the literature or negatively can positively diversity workforce and performanceimpact depending on innovation understand the nuances in the relationship between between in the relationship understand the nuances significant The and innovation. diversity workforce Based on the frequency of the collected measures, the Based on the frequencythe collected of measures, no effect or majority showed attributes of the diversity to context is crucial However, mixed. were the findings insight on the generalizability of non-STEM findings for generalizability on the of non-STEM findings insight versa. and vice the STEM workforce non-STEM studies other than the existence of more of more non-STEM studies other than the existence Further and studies in non-STEM contexts. measures could provide workforce to the STEM specific research small number of reported measures (<10). We did not We (<10). small number of reported measures STEM and across observe notable differences other disciplinary diversity—which may indicate attributes attributes disciplinary indicate may diversity—which or important STEM the prevalent for more are that based on a Some of these findings are workforce. diversity variables not previously studied in non-STEM studied in non-STEM previously variables not diversity network, collaboration and contexts—experience, Of the 63 studies, we identified 25 articles identified Of we (40 percent) the 63 studies, some STEM studies analyzed The STEM. to related the direction of the impacts (positive or negative) the direction of the impacts or negative) (positive based on measures and described the quantitative significance. and statistical frequency counts specific workforce findings with those from other with those findings workforce specific We analyzed and finance. such as business industries, diversity and innovation. We identified studies broader broader studies identified We innovation. and diversity the STEM- and compared STEM workforce than the Day 2: Tuesday, June 13 70 too. teams, andcareer ofresearchers trajectories activities onthe inunderstandingthegenderimpacts important researchers withintheorganizational context, whichis of thecollaboration patterns andinteractions of positioning willprovide study insights for thefurther of therelationship between researchers’ genderand teams at theorganizational level. The examination help usunderstandthecollaborative patterns and of researchers withinoneschoolat oneuniversity span across multipleinstitutes, structures thenetwork investigators. While collaborations ofresearchers often suchasgender,factors thepositions ofPIsandco- The latter phaseoftheanalysis considers related closeness centrality, andeigenvector centrality. of centrality measures includingthedegree centrality, and identifies structures examines aset theirnetwork names onthesamegrant. analysis The primary researchers astheco-appearance oftheresearchers’ analysis,network thisstudyoperationalizes thetiesof grant andwork intotal. in806projects As asocial the 259individuals, 208individualshadat leastone faculty, age, rank, gender, andrace/ethnicity. Among following tenured characteristics: andtenure-track at theengineering schoolallow identification ofthe The attributionaldata ofthe259individualresearchers co-investigator, andNSFdisciplineIDofeachgrant. allow theidentification investigator ofprincipal (PI), one large publicresearch university intheU.S., which grant data inanengineering schoolat of 806projects compared to maleresearchers? data isthe The primary researchers occupy lessadvantaged positions network one institute. questionis-dowomen The primary ofresearchthe networks grant membershipwithin SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 71 1:30 pm Abstracts

9:05 - 10:30 pm Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 1 Thematic Thematic Session 2 Thematic and Collaboratory Feature Panel: Humanities, Arts, Science, and Technology Alliance Alliance Technology Arts, Humanities, and Science, Panel: Feature Wednesday, June 14, 2017 June Wednesday, And Non-Academic Science Science Non-Academic And Panel: Beyond The Ivory Tower: Knowledge Production Between Academic Between Academic Knowledge Production Tower: IvoryThe Beyond Panel: available to anyone from around the world. around from anyone to available SciTS 2017 Conference: third paper, Sebastian Muñoz-Najar Galvez (Stanford University) and Charles J. Gomez (The and Charles University) J. (Stanford Sebastian Galvez Muñoz-Najar of California, University paper, third papers an illegal online repository made published research that SciHub, from Berkeley) usage data analyze of medicine between experts from academic and non-academic research environments. The second paper by paper by second The environments. expertsof medicine between academic and non-academic research from collaborated scientists and professional volunteers describes University) a case where Keep (Stanford Benjamin E. in the Finally, in RNA design. problems open scientific solve and cloud lab to environment using a problem-solving knowledge academic and non-academic science? between occurs production that in the field collaboration of a describes the evolution Tampere) by Elina I. Mäkinen first paper The of (University academic knowledge production is becoming integrated with non-academic science. The panel discussion The with non-academic science. academic knowledge integrated production is becoming typesWhat of boundary academic and between interfaces being created as: questions such are will address or hinder knowledge can society production? do they facilitate How benefit from How non-academic science? drivers for economic growth and national well-being. Yet, innovative science is partly science districted is allowed who innovative by Yet, well-being. and national growth economic for drivers in which the ways papers in this panel explore three The participateto in academic knowledge production. This panel examines an emerging trend in the global scientific enterprise: enterprise: in the global scientific production between trend knowledge an emerging panel examines This critical are and innovation technology, science, that It is widely agreed academic and non-academic science. Authors: Elina Mäkinen, Charles Gomez and SebastianAuthors: Galvez Muñoz-Najar Benjamin Keep, science to include its “art” and “craft”? and “art” include its to science in science, medicine, and health? (2) What differences exist? (3) How might SciTS and HASTAC as well as other as and HASTAC might SciTS exist? (3) How differences What health? (2) and medicine, in science, of team “science” extend understanding of the to and resources insights Humanities networks exchange Digital Consortium, it will focus on projects within the state. HASTAC is the international network Humanities, Arts, network Humanities, is the international HASTAC on projectsConsortium, within the state. it will focus and discussion of presentations panel will feature The and Consortium. and Alliance Technology and Science, in humanities and similarities collaboration between exist What (1) questions with the audience: overriding three Digital Humanities. It will establish a framework for collaborative research and education that bridges humanities that and education research collaborative It for Humanities. will establish a framework Digital a state-wide consortium, individual teams, levels: and inter/national three crosses framework The and technology. Humanities Digital the Florida by hosted of HASTAC, 2017 conference the November to a prelude As networks. Authors: Bruce Janz, Scot French, Julie Klein, Julian Chambliss and Janz, Scot French, Bruce Authors: in the cross-disciplinary and education research field of collaborative and demonstrate panel will define This Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 facilitation methods, successes andfailures Panel: 72 following allfour presentations. with event outcomes, highlighting successes, failures andlessonslearned. Interactive discussionwilltakeplace goal. audience, thepurpose, Eachpanelistwilldescribe method, andlogistics participant ofthe exercise along programmatic ofacommon event designed inservice to facilitate andcombining thesharing oftheirexpertise exercises inwhichteam of membersfrom insome type adiverse domainsparticipated array of knowledge themselves. thispanel, In team will present science practitioners ofintegrative theirexperiences withavariety theownershipalso needmethodsto ofcross-pollinating shift andintegrating matter ideasto experts thesubject across inamannerthat boundaries generateslinking combined, transformational understanding, practitioners as the linkbetween different ofthe team. However, serving moving parts time andeffort tobetruly effective at base.and knowledge areThese practitioners bought into concepts ofinterdisciplinarity andspendsignificant sector, expertise, across ofdisciplinary boundaries orotherdivision that results indifferences inculture, language For roles, many ininterdisciplinary peopleworking jobresponsibilities andcommunicating includeconnecting Authors requests) facilitate production. knowledge (visualrepresentations objects ofdata, aproblem-solvingof boundary environment, cloudlab, anddownload and collaboration between academicandnon-academicscientists. They alsoshedlight onhow differenttypes a problem-solving environment, acloudlab, anda allow“shadow for exchange ofinformation library”—that These three meetings, papersprovide insight into interfaces—transdisciplinary differenttypes ofboundary Thematic 3 Session Interdisciplinary IntegrationInterdisciplinary Exercises: Practitioners share meetingdesign, :

Christine Hendren,Christine Pips JackSchultz, Veazey andAmber Caulkins SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts

Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 1:30pm Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 73 1:30-3:00 pm agbioscience, a discipline underrepresented in the field. in the field. a discipline underrepresented agbioscience, analyzing funded and non- for 2: A framework Paper grant each phase of a research through funded teams competition Alina Contractor, Noshir Weber, Griffin Authors: Tyshchuk Lungeanu and Yulia 4. examine the productivity of the grant’s subcategories subcategories the productivity4. examine of the grant’s Scientific productivity through can be measured produces field that in any bibliometric analysis of basic idea is to The publications. within the receive publications the attention evaluate formal in citations counting communityby scientific using generated reports Citation were the literature. (WoS). of Science SEEDS output Web Reuter’s Thomson book proceedings, conference includes papers, WoS in and doctoral dissertations. patents, chapters, citations and average include the h-index Findings of its with several of the SEEDS program per item when average above or well above subcategories universities. and U.S sciences agricultural to compared OARDC practice and findings will inform research The future. SEED’s policy decisions regarding because it SciTS to contributes research This in initiative science of a team the outcome evaluates universities and agricultural science programs programs science and agricultural universities Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 4 Thematic SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: 2. calculate the average citations per item per item citations the average 2. calculate with US the productivity of the grant 3. compare bibliometric analysis. Objectives include: bibliometric analysis. the h-index 1. calculate The purpose of this study is to investigate the level of the level investigate purpose of this study is to The by program productivityscientific grant of the SEEDS Extension. To date, there has been little measurement been little measurement has there date, To Extension. output productivityresearch of the scientific of the funding. SEEDS grant from resulting research in agbioscience. SEEDS scientists work closely closely work SEEDS scientists in agbioscience. research plus OSU in 6 other OSU colleges with researchers safety and health, environmental sustainability, and sustainability, environmental and health, safety OARDC The goal of SEEDS: The bio-based energy. new encourage is to Program Grants Competitive integrates scientific disciplines to focus on finding focus on finding to disciplines scientific integrates security, including food problems societal solutions to station, the OARDC, is the largest public and privately public and privately is the largest the OARDC, station, in Ohio and the largest organization funded research Agbioscience facility in the U.S. research agbioscience Cochran experiment agriculture University’s Ohio State The station’s SEEDS competitive grant program grant SEEDS competitive station’s Smith and Graham Keith Julie Aldridge, Authors: Paper 1: Team science in agriculture: Perspectives Perspectives in agriculture: science Team 1: Paper experiment agricultural University on the Ohio State interactive evaluative discussion that may spark ideas for new applications of presented methods, or entirely new or entirely methods, presented of new applications sparkfor ideas may discussion that evaluative interactive their organizations. in exercises ideas for of applying the presented methods to different scenarios or disciplines, or patterns that may emerge across the across emerge may that or patterns or disciplines, scenarios different to methods of applying the presented four learned of having away come will Attendees or challenges. common successes terms of in exercises different participated as having of particular in an within the context as well and goals, communities exercises example incorporate in future iterations of the exercises. After all four panelsts have presented, there will be an open-ended will be there presented, have panelsts all four After of the exercises. iterations in future incorporate seed the discussion will include consideration to questions session. Potential answer question and panel-wide We will structure the first portion of this discussion by allowing each presenter to describe their approach and describeto their approach will structure the first portion each presenter by allowing of this discussion We to be useful may that attendees session to solicit from like critiquefeedback and they’d specific any identify Collaborations New Innovative Foster To Approaches Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 74 Through anefficient and uniquepeer-to-peer review and Authors: Burns Mark Valerie Johnson forDistribution Formation ofInterdisciplinary Teams Paper 3:MCubed: Token-Based Funding Seed almost asmuchfundedteams. and (3)non-fundedteams continued to collaborate gender were more likely to collaborate on proposals, joined by several newfaculty, ofthesame (2)faculty teams consisted ofasmallcore collaborators ofprior and awarded teams. findings include:(1)most Our random graph to models(ERGM) studytheapplicants and(2) apply; Networks”“Random usedexponential whodidnot consisting faculty ofrandomly selected that appliedfor teams fundingto matched virtual approach: (1) “Random Teams” compared teams actual non-funded teams. We analytical developed atwo-part awarded ofapplyingonthe teams andtheimpact years offundingonthe to determine boththeimpact the Post-Award Phase, we followed allteams for five of theteams that were awarded funding;and, (3)in in thePeer Phase, Review we lookedfor characteristics a proposal andwhethernewcollaborations formed; (2) looked at whichinvestigators choseto collaborate on pilot grant process: the (1)In Team Assembly Phase we we were ableto phasesofthe studythree distinct between teams.as connections Using theMTML model, Ordermembers; and(3)Higher (ecosystem) levels, such (dyad) level, collaboration suchasprior between team (2)Relational member; rank andgenderofeach faculty level,levels: (actor) (1)Individual suchasacademic framework to understandcollaboration at multiple (MTML) modelto create anintegrated explanatory funding. We developed aMulti-Theoretical Multilevel invited to in-personinterviews, and65were awarded Peer-review narrowed thisto 99teams that were 1,469 formed 458teams that submitted proposals. Translational 37,266eligible faculty, ScienceInstitute. Of in2009by itsClinicaland withinHarvard conducted funding competition for $50,000research pilotgrants, towards inaninternal evaluating teams participating thispresentationIn we ourapproach describe SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts creativity of the faculty andstudentscreativity to ofthefaculty bereleased. and token-based allows fundingdistribution the peer review system involving aninteractive website colleges. And thedevelopment ofaunconventional “cube” to involve from faculty at leasttwo different researchinterdisciplinary by requiring eachteam or and colleges at Michigan. The program fosters teams400 faculty/student inallnineteen schools six years, approximately distributing $30Mto over the President andProvost. The program hasrunfor Third Initiative establishedby Century theoffices of ofthe Research of (UMOR), Office MCubed ispart HousedwithintheUniversity ofMichigan of Michigan. teamsamong multi-unit, faculty-led at theUniversity to stimulate innovative research andscholarship system, MCubed distributes real-time seedfunding for thePreCIP thesecond CIPcohort, program. PreCIP program was launchedto create teams to primed apply but notalloftheteams. After thefirst year, anew development that were activities accessed by some, year, teams were offered a range ofprofessional funding for atwo-year thefirst period. During teams were formed andprovided withsignificant President for Research, research newinterdisciplinary Partnerships program” (CIP) sponsored by the Vice research teams. Through the “Catalyst for Innovative the formation andeffectiveness ofinterdisciplinary professional development program designed to assist The goalofthiswork was to create anintegrated Authors: Suter Meghan andEllenFisher Training for Effective Teaming Paper 4:Professional Development for Team Science: Michigan. the strategies for on itsimplementation, anditsimpact discuss thecore intheprogram’s design, to theMCubed program. thispresentation, In we will innovative due university intheworld for 2016,inpart systemthe University ofMichigan astheseventh most Chronicle Education, andReuters ofHigher recognized as Science (website), The Washington Post, and The To date, MCubed hasbeenfeatured invenues such Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 75 1:30-3:00 pm Resources, and Using Available Tools. Tools. Available and Using Resources, Measuring Team • The-Science-of-Team-Science: Effectiveness and Informetrics Technologies • Collaborative Scientists and Interprofessional Team • Educating to explore and address topics that foster collaborative collaborative foster that topics and address explore to and Its awareness raise main goal is to science. important areas key topical to scholarship around science. and team collaboration interface individuals to in In encouraging addition to and schools, disciplines, across scholarly conversation the seminar seminar ensures, which this institutions, issues about a variety of organizational addresses of informed which in the absence needed mechanisms, can understanding, and common policies, knowledge, serve scholarship goals. as barriers achieving team to and builds a GW seminar addresses university This of these a few around agenda of scholarly conversation critical mechanisms: Your Knowing Scientist: Being Prepared, Team • Being a and were more successful according to their respective respective their to according successful more and were is CIP teams for Success metrics. programmatic for funds by securingextramural significant defined publications new collaborative research, collaborative beyond collaboration and continued and presentations, is teams PreCIP for Success the CIP funding period. development completion of professional by defined the CIP and to submission of a proposal workshops, those and similar metrics to funding, selection for contribute findings These CIP teams. evaluate used to intentional how by demonstrating field the SciTS to activities for designed development professional accelerate can potentially interdisciplinary teams collaboration. productive Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 5 Thematic them with regional and national partners and national them with regional and experts SciTS 2017 Conference: (C3@GWU) University Seminar that convenes a cross- Seminar University convenes that (C3@GWU) disciplinary community of expert in faculty interested connects and collaboration scientific to issues related to this charge was to develop the Creating a Culture a Culture the Creating develop to was this charge to University Washington George at of Collaboration requiring more team-oriented scientific approaches team-oriented approaches scientific more requiring 2010; National (Bennet, Gadlin, & Levine-Finley, 2015; Obama, 2015). Our response of Science, Academy Foundation (NSF), and executive orders that encourage encourage that orders (NSF), and executive Foundation disciplines within and across collaboration greater and federal recommendations from agencies like the from recommendations and federal (NAS), the National of Science Academies National Science Institutes of Health (NIH), the National new initiatives exist on local, regional, and national and national regional, on local, exist new initiatives executive to responses from of these stem Many levels. Problem. In an effort to promote collaboration in collaboration In an effortto promote Problem. many tackling teams problems, complex research Science Framework (OSF) Science Framework and Megan Potterbusch Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano Paper 1: Creating a Culture of Collaboration at George George at of Collaboration a Culture 1: Creating Paper Utilizing the Open (C3@GWU) University Washington within their team in the workshop setting. We found found We setting. in the workshop within their team participated that those teams in the professional that closer social networks formed workshops development promoting intra-team learning through the sharing learning through intra-team promoting and providing and feedback; ideas, of challenges, the opportunityteams apply and practice the skillsto for emerging teams. These include: aligning workshops workshops aligning include: These teams. emerging for of academic research; the unique challenges to and engagement with industryand engagement and philanthropic elements key several found We partners and sponsors. development professional with successful associated and brand definition; validation of the research research of the validation definition; and brand with stakeholders; communication objectives through provided a variety of workshops on team building, building, a variety on team of workshops provided skills; communication proposition, mission, value Creating An Institutional Culture For Team Science Team For Institutional An Culture Creating Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 76 Authors: Hayes Robin Case Study of Team ScienceinthePhysical Sciences Paper 2:USDOEEnergy Frontier Research Centers: A science. and scholarshipinthearea ofteam andcollaborative similar programs asameansto increase awareness resources, we hopeto encourage othersto fashion university setting. Through oftheprogram sharing and expanding discourse, scholarship, ina andservice seminar provides alow modelfor cost, highimpact SciTS Advancement. The C3@GWUuniversity seminar’s multiplephases. as infrastructure for thesuccessful execution ofthe Framework were introduced, incorporated, andserved how thetechnologies suchastheOpenScience university setting. addition,we In willdemonstrate awareness andvalues, ina anditspotential impact plan asanexample ofhow to promote team science of theC3@GWUprogram anditsthree year strategic Method. The presenters planto provide anoverview theprocessby aswell making public. astheproducts develop scholarshipinthefieldof collaborative science allow othersto buildonthiswork andthereby further access to someoralloftheir work. This will inturn best suittheirneedswhilealsofacilitating future public each thinktankteam canorganize to theirOSFproject leveraging theOSF’s flexible and structure features, stakeholders withdifferent levels ofengagement.By as aplatform for engaging disparate anddiverse we explored theOpenScience Framework (OSF) the university community. To managethisundertaking, that andproducts aredeveloping delivered activities to andstaff willallowthis project to faculty contribute to intheseareas.thinkers andpractitioners Ultimately, key tank”“think outcomes, together whichwillbring archives, through university events andproducts, This university seminarcompiles, disseminates, and Science andResearch • Crossing Gender, Ethnic, andCultural in Boundaries • Trust, Vision, Credit Recognition andScholarly SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts science. Since 2009,DOEhasinvested $1.087Bin60 talented students andpostdocs interested inenergy scientific next-generation workforce by attracting of single-investigator projects. They alsotrain the basic research withacomplexity beyond thescope energy-relevant non-profits,to perform andindustry teams from universities, government laboratories, togetherbring creative, scientific multidisciplinary and national security. The intent isto oftheEFRCs the Department’s missionsinenergy, environment, foundation for advanced technologies that support grand challengescience andcreate thescientific (https://science.energy.gov/bes/efrc/) to further Energy Frontier Research Center program (EFRC) ofBasicEnergy Sciences (BES)establishedthe Office 2009,theU.S. ofEnergy’sIn Department (DOE) program to be highly successful inmeetingitsgoals. BoardEnergy Advisory Task Force have found theEFRC Two BESCommittees of Visitors of andaSecretary that andprocess structure canpromote team science. seekto identify themyriad impacts waysself-reported publication over networks co-authorship timeand shared withallthecenters. Preliminary analyses of been captured Practices inaGood document and events.and virtual Ideasto foster team science have Careerand anEarly that Network organizes in-person newsletter runby members; juniorEFRC quarterly students andpostdocs; communication contests; a biennial Principal Investigators’ that include Meetings within thematic teams; Director’s periodic meetings; monthly phonecalls year; amid-term peerreview; review andprogram managervisitwithinthefirst to promote synergy including:amanagement collaborations. BEShasexplored multiplemechanisms of team science rather thantraditional pairwise One majorchallengehasbeencreating aculture and staff. average, 18Sr. Investigators and50students, postdocs, a 4or5year renewable award andinvolves, period on institutions. Eachcenter isfundedat $2-$5M/year for EFRCs, ofwhich36are active, in40states at about150 Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 77 Excellence represent five broad areas of research. Each Each research. of areas broad five represent Excellence Office the Provost’s has a modest budget from area that and other kinds seed grants of programming for voluntary of self-definedcommittee are by a steering about thirty of all date, percent To faculty appointees. and a TAE, with the self-affiliate faculty Binghamton at a half a million dollars of just over modest investment least $5M in at generated have seed grants in internal 90% of the inter- about Furthermore, external awards. in the University projectsdepartmental across research this that showing affiliate, TAE least one at 2015-16 have of those faculty the attention structure has captured their departments outside of in collaborating interested while that a self-study shows However, in research. in developed gains and interest been rapid have there obstacles keep this effortthis structure, on the margins. better to experience paper will use Binghamton’s This aspects fundamental understand how of academic institutions challenge and higher education life work. collaborative transdisciplinary, Paper 4: Fundamental Challenges to Transdisciplinary Transdisciplinary Challenges to 4: Fundamental Paper Higher in Research Education Valerie Imbruce Authors: commonly is more research Transdisciplinary of how of goals than processes as a set understood efforts seek that Transdisciplinary them. achieve to bridge departments,to within and schools colleges intellectual, structural, entrenched face a university uses this three- paper This barriers. and inter-personal being part the processes consider characterization to a highly selective University, Binghamton at developed of New University in the State university public research coordinated wide, a university foster to system, York In transdisciplinary to its fourthapproach research. of Areas Transdisciplinary the of operation, year Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: existing T&P process and add additional evaluation and add additional evaluation process T&P existing science. team and reward recognize criteria to be rewarded. We suggest that universities provide provide universities that suggest We be rewarded. faculty junior to members additional mentorship within the collaborations their showcase to on how the current annual evaluation and T&P criteria does and annual evaluation the current faculty and that team science recognize not sufficiently efforts should research collaborative that believe interviews with faculty, and a survey of researchers at a at and a survey of researchers interviews with faculty, that Our study found public American university. large examines how T&P committees evaluate team science science team evaluate T&P committees how examines text and network analysis from analyzing data by T&P criteria, and annual evaluation level of college research often requires researchers and labs to work work and labs to researchers often requires research paper This disciplines. both within and across in teams service. This evaluation system was created in a context in a context created was system evaluation This service. individual by completed was when most research contemporary However, and labs. researchers and universities aims to evaluate faculty’s work and work faculty’s evaluate aims to and universities and teaching, high quality faculty research, for reward McCarty (T&P) and promotion tenure colleges at The process Evaluating Faculty Achievement Faculty Evaluating Kennelly Okraku and Christopher Therese Authors: Paper 3: Recognizing Team Science in the Tenure and Tenure the in Science Team 3: Recognizing Paper for Tool a Common Developing Process: Promotion Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 An Emerging Disciplineto Effect Collaboration Panel: Interdisciplinary Team Science Collaboration over Time Identify Potential Research Sites &Partners andto Monitor&Evaluate Panel: Before, During, Analysis andAfter –Using Network Social asa Tool 78 Panelists willshare ofscientific managers, theresults community as ofaAAASsurvey well aspreliminary role inteam science andscience communities broadly. and3)explore stepswork; required thechallengesandnext for validation ofwhat we functional believe isakey showcasing thediversity andcommonalities oftheroles andcontexts withinwhichmembersoftheCEFP cohort andenhancingitsdevelopment;for 2)share supporting examples ofscience management community by ofscience management community asanemergingoverview disciplineandintroduce CEFPasamechanism nascent profession. andleaders--are to 1)provide ofCEFPparticipants The goalsofthispanel--composed an Program (CEFP) to develop isworking aconceptual framework that could ofthis helpdefinekeycharacteristics The Association American for theAdvancement ofScience’s inaugural Community Engagement Fellowship andstakeholders.practitioners to engagetheirmembers.as scientific communities looking However, the role has yet to be definedformally byits Community management inscience isanemerging role for that provides research support critical teams aswell Authors: Jennifer Davison, Andreas Leidolf, Lou Woodley, Elisha Wood-Charlson Sandstrom andMalin communities. these communities asthebasisfor to anintervention strengthen core communities looselyconnected andbridge demonstrate amethodto identify stablecollaborative communities over timeandexplore thepotential to use scientists to inform changesto theorganization implementation. during oftheproject The third presentation will relationship intensity was adapted for analysis usewithsocialnetwork methodsto measure collaboration among relationships between theauthorsanddamstheystudy. The second presentation demonstrates how ascaleof in Brazil was usedto notonlyidentify existing clusters ofacademiccollaboration, butalsoto analyze the The firstpresentation illustrates analysis how ofpublications a co-author related to hydroelectric development three research that analysis projects eachusedsocialnetwork methodsto enhance team interdisciplinary science. thatmap andexamine facilitate thefactors andconstrain interactions amongscientists. thispanelwe In present is anemerging theme withinthescholarshipofteam science. analysis network presents Social novel ways to projects for collaborationEnhancing thecapacity interdisciplinary inlarge-scale amongscientists whoparticipate Authors: Ma Thematic 1 Session Thematic 2 Session Community inScientific Management Teams and Communities: son Mathews, Wendy-Lin andChristopher McCarty Bartels SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

to 3:30pm 3:30pm Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 79 3:30 pm cross-disciplinary collaborative research the quality cross-disciplinary research collaborative is directly (positive/negative) of emotional context transfer with the quality of information correlated episodes. within communicative of close examination involves Our investigation dialogues involving “Toolbox” 1-2 hour structured, These two aspects are in tension. Efforts to encourage Efforts aspects two to encourage in tension. These are criticism, as discouraging openness can be interpreted as critical can be silencing. perceived feedback whereas where contexts in research is exacerbated tension This of understanding can challenge existing new ways making to adjudicate it difficult of accuracy, standards preserve that openness. in ways critical exchanges in cross- research further to matters, And complicate disciplinary distinct puts in play and possibly contexts of accuracy. standards incompatible needs of openness and criticism must competing The but and insight, innovation maximize be managed to an understanding requires management successful In this talk, one another. to related they are of how of within the context that the hypothesis examine we Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 3 Thematic (cf. [3]). (cf. SciTS 2017 Conference: members can be criticized, improving their accuracy improving members can be criticized, generated of information the amount and increasing benefits when its emotional context encourages open context encourages benefits when its emotional on the transactional side, [2]. Second, communication team by exchanged benefits when the claims a team two key aspects of communication within research key aspectstwo within research of communication team a research side, on the relational First, teams. transactional communication [1]—i.e., between between [1]—i.e., transactional communication and its communication character of the affective character—guides our inquiryinformational into communication among collaborators critical. In critical. this among collaborators communication talk, and a familiar distinction relational between Collaborative research distributes the effort distributes of research Collaborative makes which a team, across understanding the world Gonnerman, Kara Hall, Troy Hall, Anna Malavisi, Michael Malavisi, Anna Hall, Troy Gonnerman, Kara Hall, O’Rourke, Marisa Rinkus, Brian Robinson and Stephanie Vasko transfer in cross-disciplinary in transfer dialogue Chad Crowley, Stephen Hubbs, Graham Authors: Paper 1: On the interaction of affect and information of affect and information 1: On the interaction Paper approach, and methodologies? and methodologies? approach, • How does the Science Community Manager role overlap or complement that of the Interdisciplinary Integrative of the Interdisciplinary that or complement Integrative overlap Manager Community does the Science role • How vision, scope, foundation, in underlying and differences commonalities are What roles? or other nascent Specialist, measure value? How can we support in our can we How value? each other in performingmeasure grow and collectively roles our multiple development? professional • Where is the profession of Science Community Manager headed over the course of the next Does course the 2-5 years? Manager Community of Science over headed is the profession Where • and demonstrate do we How profession? of an accredited in the form example for need formalization, this role community goals. We will also examine points of connection and synergy with other efforts, including those with other of connection points and synergy will also examine We community goals. and Implementation Science community and the Integration Intereach Science’s Team of within the Science questions include: Framing community. Following the presentations we will further explore with attendees issues around the community manager role, the community manager role, will further issues around we with attendees explore the presentations Following support best practices to and science and emerging team challenges, skill common sets, including required observations from follow-up research conducted on the CEFP cohort itself, through examination of job of job examination through conducted on the CEFP cohort itself, research observations follow-up from skills charts, analyses. and needs time budgets, self-assessment, organizational network maps, descriptions, Perspectives Disciplines And Build Bridges Across To Dialogue Approaches Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 80 synthesize themultiplescientific involved perspectives solar system oftheNExSSmissionto evolution. As part signals ofthoseconditions relate to of trajectories conditions for life onexoplanets, andhow detectable coordination that network investigates possible Exoplanet System Science(NExSS)isaNASAresearch for life onplanetsotherthanEarth. The Nexus for disciplines. Astrobiology search istheinterdisciplinary over aweek-long exercise to between buildbridges acquisition attitudes andknowledge interdisciplinary This paperstudiesthedevelopment andmerging of Desch Authors: Burnam-Fink, C.J. Michael Huffand Steve atKnowledge theNExSS Winter School Paper Attitudes 2:Development and ofInterdisciplinary communication, e.g., genderandcareer stage. variables that may influence theaffective of character demographic between thread andcertain quality evaluation alsoincludesassessment ofdependencies among thread andemotionalvalence. quality Our of ourmethodology, we evaluate therelationships thread. thedevelopment After describing andtesting we callthe “emotional valence” oftheconversational use theIBM Tone Analyzer that [4]to yieldaconstruct assessment ofemotionalcontext ofconversations we codes oftranscripts. episode usingexpert To provide an of information transfer withinacommunication investigatingIn ourhypothesis, we assessthequality their contribution to mutualunderstanding. judged exemplary, middle, orfailedfor of thequality awareness). Basedonthecodes, thethreads have been (e.g.,impact increase self-awareness, increase team- (e.g.,function new information, question)and iscodedeach oftheseturns for bothconversational comprising thematically related turns, and speaking research teams have beendividedinto 102threads Six ofthesedialoguesinvolving cross-disciplinary their approach to science andtheircommon project. teammates aboutthebeliefs andvalues that shape conversation scientific amongcross-disciplinary SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts successful team science between disciplines(Cooke et baseisakeycomponentand acommon knowledge of ofeachothers’knowledge disciplines. respect Mutual demonstrated improvementsall participants in understanding between thedisciplines. Furthermore, of theworkshop, indicating thedevelopment increased revealsurveys that thisdividelessenedover thecourse science.geochemistry, Pre and planetary andpost dividesbetween astrophysics, disciplinary prior andholisticapproachesreductionist matching astrobiology revealed theexistence ofasplitbetween ofattendee’sA survey favorability onopenquestions in researchers. researchers heldaweek-long Winter for School junior in thesearch for life intheuniverse, agroup ofNExSS medical centers around theUS. We useapre-post scienceinterdisciplinary teams withinseven major Respondents were individualscurrently engagedin for success for teams. interdisciplinary integration isthefirststep inimproving the conditions the effectiveness oftraining onbehaviors that facilitate integrative behaviors ofteam members. Establishing of communication training oncognitive andsocial Foundation study, supported we test theimpact of collaboration readiness. thisNational Science In an integrative capacity. Thus, theyare indicators among team membersisaprecursor to developing and innovation. Cognitive andsocialintegration likely to achieve integration theirgoalsofknowledge psychological, andcognitive processes, willbemore sustained through aninteractive social, system linking that develop anintegrative capacity, that is acapability Prior research teams suggests that interdisciplinary and Authors: Salazar Maritza Theresa Lant Science Participants Paper 3:EnhancingIntegrative among Capability Team (Davis &Scalice, 2014). inscientific interventions training impactful measuring the successful application ofamodelfor creating and al, 2015),andtheNExSS Winter demonstrates School Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 81 and express feelings, thereby revealing tacit revealing thereby feelings, and express knowledge is otherwise that communicate. to difficult this through knowledge creation Organizational amplifies individual-level knowledge process dialogic and crystallizes it as a part of the knowledge network the discovery of insights allowing of an organization, the effectiveness However, individually. not attainable knowledge creation of dialogue as organizational and boundaries of the the nature by is limited tool structures Organizational context. organizational decisional encourage social interaction; promote that and personal responsibility; on group autonomy focus leadership are performance; with strong combined dialogue. fostering necessary for conditions by offering field the SciTS advances research This and participatory, on collaborative, new insights less in a comparatively processes communicative social enterprises. form, organizational researched a shared understanding of the social problem to to the social problem understanding of a shared integrating and and coordinating be addressed; diverse across actors different the efforts of many since find that knowledge We knowledge domains. is often gained iteratively (social) systems of complex and translate transfer it is critical to and progressively, understandings and informal member experiences and systems transmission, oral rules, written through SEVs Effective apprenticeships. and informal of formal the through learningorganizations in creating invest and structures routines of organizational creation opportunities dialogue among and provide that for Sustained dialogue encourages actors. diverse between and when used with the sharing of experiences to enables members metaphorical language, effective articulatesuspend their assumptions, their perspectives Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Dialogue, conceptualized as a continuous inquiry as a continuous conceptualized Dialogue, the assumptions and certainties constitute into that developing 1993), is key to (Isaacs, life everyday space of social enterprises and understand the critical and understand the of social enterprises space social change. promoting it plays role empowerment in SEVs. Qualitative data from seven seven from data Qualitative in SEVs. empowerment reveal to analyzed in India and the US were urban SEVs in the collaborative of communication the centrality sectoral and inter-organizational knowledgesectoral inter-organizational and network and local capacity building, collaborative creation, goals are to address social problems and facilitate facilitate and social problems address to goals are & Stokols, (Trivedi social change sustained positive of inter- the process scrutinizes research This 2011). Entrepreneurial Ventures (SEVs). SEVs are collaborative collaborative are SEVs (SEVs). Ventures Entrepreneurial and participatory whose forms organizational This article focuses on the integral significance significance articleThis on the integral focuses of cross-institutional of dialogue in the creation knowledge of Social networks in the context Authors: Chitvan Trivedi and Shalini Misra Trivedi Chitvan Authors: Paper 4: The Integral Place of Dialogue in Social Place Integral The 4: Paper Ventures Entrepreneurial more likely to develop an integrative capacity will that an integrative develop likely to more their goals of knowledge integration help them achieve and innovation. scientists. If training increases the demonstration of the demonstration If increases training scientists. will be teams behaviors, and social integrative cognitive Thus, the presentation of this research advances the advances of this research presentation the Thus, a means of investigating by science of team science of individual readiness enhancing the collaboration their propensity to suggest new ideas and to engage in engage new ideas and to suggest to their propensity reflexivity. team the participants in the team the participants communication science in the team terms of in improvement significant showed training properties. We test for differences pre and post training, post training, and pre differences for test We properties. communication individuals who received comparing suggest that Our results those who did not. to training assess cognitive and social integration behaviors, which which behaviors, and social integration assess cognitive good psychometric have to been demonstrated have design to test the impact of training. Team members members Team the impact test to of training. design to surveys of scales developed comprised completed Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 Team Formation And Cohesion 82 of corruption. asasource creates andserves redundancy inefficiency of oilto Exxon’s with15.5 to production seethat e.g., compare Sinopec’s 124.6employees/M BBL democracy, where theywere highlyinterdependent; redundant, versus as oilfirms teams operating ina operating under adictatorship, where theywere highly for Cummings by as comparing oilfirms teams efficiency. However, Lawless (2017) foundsupport speculated improves that redundancy ateam’s science perspective, (2007,p. Centola &Macy 716) reducing interdependence. From atraditional social to teams,adds redundancy impedingteams by interdependent, implyingthat forced interdisciplinarity that thebestscientific teams were highly interdisciplinary, butby removing interdisciplinarity, scientific teams worstwere performing themost of team members? Cummings (2015)found that the ofteams: How to aggregatetheory thecontributions Team size to isafundamental acomplete barrier improves science andsocialwelfare. amongteams but that competitions (perturbations) competitions, politicalcontests, decisions); orjury (e.g., teamor predict performance winnersofsport teams, orfixdysfunctional cannotperfect interviews scientifically evaluating or teams withself-reports determined by itsmembership(Lawless, 2017);that established that ateam’s cannotbe performance ofinterdependence,derived from atheory we have size. With ofteam ourgoalametrics performance but nottheoretically, effect on team withanunknown statistically associated withthebestscience teams, interdependenceCooke (2015)reported &Hilton Authors: BillLawless teams anddysfunctional teams reveal perfect Paper 1:Perturbations ofinterdependent (science) Thematic 4 Session SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts to tear its structure apart. Concluding, to tear apart. itsstructure withfurther σ more individualsisimpossiblewithoutavote (viz.,the (1951/1963), aggregating preferences ofthree or e.g., andobservation; frommatches Arrow oftheory B, offactor leadingto knowledge severalthe exact deviation for A(σ factor From ofthestandard knowledge Equation (1),theexact [A,B]=iC →σ interdependence for orcompeting two teams factors is: With Fourier of pairsfrom Cohen (1995),ourtheory divorce, Eq. (3)isreversed: as saydysfunctional, illuminated a team by aperturbation, team’s contrast, mission.In whenateam becomes on team structure,least effort generating MEP for a (science) teams expend the the bestperforming From Eq. (3),as MEP): (maximumentropyfor performance or production, (leastentropystructure orLEP)timesthat production, to thestandard deviation ofentropy produced by team deteriorates,performance allowing usto revise Eq. (1) role lackof conflict, communication, etc., team fitness; asa team’s dofincrease, due to redundancy, onlyifitimprovesinterdisciplinarity isfunctional team With thismodelfrom theory, team fitiscrucial; log(dof of ateam and Assuming thebestavailable individualsfillthe roles as asingleunit, then adjustment, occurs with degrees offreedom, then,without members doesnotaggregate summarily. aggregation If (e.g., adictatorship). Thus, ateam ofinterdependent oraunilateral ruleinademocracy) decision majority Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. MEP → 0 σ (perfect team) LEP ; i.e., team expends adysfunctional entropy σ MEP ∑n log (dof A ≥ 1/2 ) ≤log(dof individuals σ σ LEP B ≥ 1/2(1) → 0 (3) ∑dof team = dof , inthelimit A ) precludes simultaneously ) (dysfunctional team) equalsto itsentropy gives team . But if the perfect team acts team acts . Butiftheperfect = 1 σ LEP . →∞ σ MEP ) , inthelimit →∞ (2) 3:30pm ; thus, Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 83 Authors: Amy Wilstermann and Rachael Baker Wilstermann Amy Authors: been have team science of benefits potential Many capacityachieve to including enhanced identified, productivity and improved increased and reach, goals, However, members. individual team for outcomes of these factors hinder attainment that several We proceed as follows. First, we perform a conventional perform we a conventional First, as follows. proceed We of predict the explanatoryOLS model to power deal with To of a game. factor on outcome ecosystem and data arising in dyadic autocorrelation dyadic observations, we across interdependence subsequent widely used in technique a perform regression, MRQAP data. dyadic ecosystem that Our demonstrates empirical analysis impactsgame in a factor significantly the outcome are Our results League. all seasons of Indian Premier characteristic of idiosyncratic by any not influenced be extended to well Cricket games in IPL and could the perspective From teams. other domains involving provides our research Science, Team of of Science art the wherein into insights building, of team novel factor of serve determinant ecosystem as a stronger of an organization. success Living Intentional from Lessons 3: Applying Paper Science Team to Communities that knowledge of former teammates, colleagues, or colleagues, knowledge teammates, that of former in a competitive role a substantial play collaborators factor of ecosystem role precise the However, setting. unexplored. still remains of a competition on outcome a setting in (IPL) exemplifies League Indian Premier – two emerges factor naturally which the ecosystem the for with each other in the past who played players We franchises. starts different same team, for playing impact is the What the question: empirically address robust How outcome? factor on match of ecosystem factor once ecosystem of is the effect and significant prior and within team of a team strength for control we data on longitudinal draws Ourinteractions? research in of every played match proceedings collected from and 2016. 2012 seasons of the IPL between all the five Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: from politics, business firms and sports, where we have we have business firms and sports, politics, where from allies worsen former between relations witnessed how imagine one could Intuitively rivalry. and lead to defined as difference of nA and nB. The current study The current nB. of nA and defined as difference instances by factor is motivated of ecosystem on role For example, if team A and team B are competing in competing B are A and team if team example, For from A and nB players from and nA players a match, factor is then ecosystem teammates, former B are defined as members belonging to overlapping teams. teams. overlapping to defined as members belonging the overlapping teams, In of competing the context teammates. former rivals who were to members refer impact on the outcome of a competition between two two between impact of a competition on the outcome is ecosystem fields, In of scientific the context teams. teams in multi-team membership are competing competing membership are in multi-team teams on the little explored focus We against each other. factor and its the ecosystem interaction: idea of team the premises of an individual’s task in multiple teams, task in multiple teams, of an individual’s the premises where has been done in the situation little contribution past experience of cooperation among individuals of cooperation past experience impacts the performance during a contest. of a team has been studied within membership multi-team While multi-team membership and coopetition and introduce and introduce membership and coopetition multi-team how investigating factor for of ecosystem the concept Noshir Contractor on literature the existing In advance this work, we vs. team competitions team vs. and Brian Uzzi Huang, Yun Satyam Mukherjee, Authors: for the science teams of tomorrow. of tomorrow. teams the science for factor influencing the victorteam in 2: Ecosystem Paper generation is additive (Shannon information), the two the two information), (Shannon is additive generation performance, whether the a team’s a metric for forming a key step machines or robots, humans, are teammates to itself and outsiders is subadditive (Von is subadditive itself and outsiders to Neumann information a dysfunctional while team’s information) emotionally in a state similar to a ground state, the state, a ground similar to emotionally in a state and state; a perturbed,dysfunctional at team excited of information generation the perfectthat team’s ones (i.e., more arrangements are possible), requiring requiring possible), are arrangements more ones (i.e., the perfect that operates (revenue); team energy more research, ceteris paribus, we expect to find that larger larger expect find that to we paribus, ceteris research, than smaller entropy more structures generate team Day 3: Wednesday, June 14 84 initiative at ourinstitution. assessment strategies for anewteam-based research the way that we structure, implement, anddesign gained from intentional livingcommunities are shaping of events andachievements. The lessonsandinsights centered andscaffolded mentoring, and celebration include Specific practices cooperative learning, growth- unique talents, andcommitment to community. include shared visionandmission,recognition of of collaborative research projects. Specificprinciples to enhance thelong-term successserve andthriving inintentionalfactors livingcommunities andmay that andpractices reduceprinciples theeffects ofthese of thesamedisruptive factors. We alsoidentified that team science livingshare andcommunity many United States we andtheUnited Kingdom, discovered faith-based intentional livingcommunities across the to team science. Through visitsanddiscussionswith ofourtraditionpractices could addto ourapproach institution, we wondered what theculture, values, and engaged inresearch at afaith-basedundergraduate science.the context inwhichtheyconduct As faculty researcher’s approach to doingscience isinformed by these factors. Philosophers ofscience suggestthat a dependent uponimplementing strategies that mitigate success ofateam science initiative istherefore, inpart, goal misalignment, have alsobeenidentified. The benefits, suchashightaskinterdependence and SciTS 2017Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Poster Abstracts

Submitted Posters

SciTS 2017 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 85 Day 1: Monday, June 12 86 Key Siesta and Gallery Science of Team Science2017–Poster Session Robin Straub Straub Robin POSTER 10 Miguez Mery and Magnan Kimberley Brown Salinero, Kennan POSTER 9 Hodges-Murad Tierini POSTER 8 Turcotte Dainel and Annick, S-Amand, Robitaille, Saint-Jacques, Caroline Marie-Christine, POSTER 7 Ujhazy Peter and Melissa Antman Nothwehr, Hruszkewycz, Steven Julia Andrew Hubbard, Artnold, Leah Kuzmin, Igor POSTER 6 Yanovitzky Itzak and Matthew Weber, Kristensen, M. Teis POSTER 5 Kamata Takehito POSTER 4 Guo Li POSTER 3 Falk-Krzesinski J. Holly POSTER 2 Grant Elliot David and Hall, Garner Kara Vogel, Amanda POSTER 1 Day 1:Monday, June12,2017 WEB-BASED WEB-BASED TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE SCITS COMMUNITY SciTS 2017Conference: CREATING SHAREDGOALS AND TRUST research partnership inCanadaresearch through three partnership keymoments inits Examination ofprocesses that contributed to thesuccess ofa R01Research Project GrantsOutperform inCitation Productivity Program Project Grant (P01andP50/SPOREs) Mechanisms Surrounding ChildhoodObesity When Scientific Matters:EvidenceReally Policy Windows States study ofpublicresearch fundingpoliciesinJapanandtheUnited Advancing international research collaborations: Acomparative around biotechnologies (Poster Presentation) Therapoid: anewonlineplatform for scientific collaboration Team Science Resource The Science of Mendeley Team An Essential Science(SciTS)Library: the SciTS Community The Team Science Toolkit: Hubfor An Sharing OnlineKnowledge Research on Transdisciplinary Teamwork at the ZZL-Network Teacher Education? Introducing aQuestionnaire for Accompanying How to Capture Transdisciplinary Cooperation andIntegration in UApplied to Science: Theory What’s Possible? Collaboration intheLoosely Coupled Academy development POLICY LEVEL PERSPECTIVES LEVEL POLICY Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 6:00 – 6:45 pm Day 1: Monday, June 12 87 Poster Abstracts Poster CURRICULUM CURRICULUM AND TRAINING Co-design models for addressing complex societal challenges complex Co-design addressing models for medication improve to analysis workflow Primary team care and coordination communication reconciliation Dynamic science: as a Planning Sustaining team Design ecology collaborative Measuring Proposal Needs and Allocating Sufficient Research Research Sufficient and Allocating Needs Measuring Proposal Support network: research clinical facilitating and the FACIAL science Team microsomia in craniofacial An Evidence Based Competency Model for Team Science Training Training Science Team Based Competency Model for Evidence An of An Teaching Service in the Learning Team-based Incorporating CA Fresno, from Study A Case Course: Application Agribusiness Science Team of and the Science Ethics Geomatics and society: effective transdisciplinary for prototypes science team a Self-Scoring the Motivation Developing Mechanism for and Collaboration Integration, Readiness, Team for Assessment (MATRICx) Science Restoration for Enterprise + Community Curriculum (CCERS) DESIGN, COMMUNICATION, AND COORDINATION DESIGN, COMMUNICATION, Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for McGreavy Steckowych POSTER 21 Tyler Quiring and Bridie POSTER 20 Marie Smith and Kathryn POSTER 19 Maeve Donohue Marina Rampazzo,Craig Mark Birgfeld, Urata, AlexisBabette Johns Saltzman and Amelia Drake, CarrieDaniela Heike, Luquetti, Daniela Scott Bartlett, Vivaldi, Laura Stueckle, Monica Vandenberg POSTER 18 POSTER 17 Pei Xu POSTER 16 Jonathan Beever Wiseman POSTER 15 Kevin Wooten, EduardoTheresa Salas, Lant, MaritzaHuda Salazar, Sarraj, Allan Brasier and Lori Erica Watson-Currie POSTER 14 Mallinson POSTER 13 Alexandra Rosenberg,R. Lotrecchiano, Gaetano andTrudy Margarita Paras andLopez Fernando POSTER 12 POSTER 11 POSTER SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Day 1: Monday, June 12 88 The Science of Mendeley Team An Essential Science(SciTS)Library: Team Science Resource The Team Science Toolkit: Hubfor An Sharing OnlineKnowledge theSciTSCommunity Authors: HollyJ. Falk-Krzesinski, Vice President, Strategic Alliances, Elsevier ofthe science producedthe quality by teams. SciTS research, stimulate for newdirections team science andresearch, practice andultimately helpto maximize science. doingso, By the Toolkit replication canreduce tools for ofpractical unnecessary team science aswell as team science, broadly and to make thisknowledge available to thewiderange ofstakeholdersinterested inteam Overall, the Toolkit aimsto integrate andunifythediverse andgrowing abouteffective knowledge practices for whoare usingteam science experts inthefield,hand-selected teaching team science, orstudying team science. measures to enablemeta-analysis andintegrative data analysis, collaboration. andinterdisciplinary Authors are data andreuse, sharing training undergraduates inteam science, crowdsourcing harmonizationof to support population blogfeaturethe very onthe Toolkit. Recent blogpostshave issuesas: addressed suchwide-ranging been generated by investigators, administrators, fundingagencies, andSciTSscholars. The poster alsohighlights improvement oriented evaluation, andrecognition andrewards for team science. The Toolkit’s tools have practical team science that are available onthe Toolkit, to helpwithformation, team functioning, team training, quality the success ofteam science, (SciTSlist). andavibrant linkedlistserv This poster tools highlights for practical The Toolkit blogfeaturing relevant perspectives knowledgeable to alsoincludesapopularexpert maximizing integrates resources from thewiderange ofdisciplinesgenerating scholarshiprelevant to success inteam science. teamfacilitate, science; (2)measures to orsupport studyorevaluate team science; and(3)abibliography that over 2600resources. The Toolkit offers threetypes of main resources: tools (1)practical to helpengagein, are of2011.Newcontentin thespring continually beingadded. andfunctionality The Toolkit currently includes Toolkit was created by theNational Cancer Institute, anddebuted at theAnnual InternationalSciTSConference a continuously evolving store knowledge that represents thecurrent “state ofthescience” intheSciTSfield. The resources ofallmemberstheSciTS community. Anyone canuploadordownload Toolkit resources, creating baseofresourcesa user-generated knowledge andinformation that leverages and thecollective knowledge forstop-shop resources to helpyou engagein,lead, facilitate, evaluate orstudyteam science. support, contains It to helpyou achieve your goals. The Team Science Toolkit (www.teamsciencetoolkit.cancer.gov) isanonlineone- research, improvement orto useinquality oriented evaluation? The Team Science Toolkit resources haspractical orfacilitatewho would team liketo science? better you Do support needmeasures orinstruments for SciTS leader whowould liketo create anorganizational climate that fosters success inteam science? Are you afunder Are you aninvestigator whoworks inteams orleadsteams? Are you anacademicadministrator ororganizational Inc.), Elliot (Westat, T. Inc.), andthe Grant (Westat, Team Science Toolkit Editorial Board Authors: Amanda L. Vogel (Leidos L.Hall(National Cancer BiomedicalResearch, Inc.),Kara David Institute), Garner Poster 2 Poster 1 SciTS 2017Conference: Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 89 Poster Abstracts Poster Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Poster 3 Poster combination of collaboration and biotechnologies will lead to better therapeutics for patients in every patients country. for therapeutics better will lead to and biotechnologies of collaboration combination crowdsourcing ecosystem. The Therapoid web portal enables international scientists to share research easily, while easily, research portal share to web scientists Therapoid enables international The ecosystem. crowdsourcing The collaboration. effective enable more use tools Simple to technologies. dormant develop to it also opens a path community. Once a biotechnology is on-boarded, free of cost, the global community can collaborate and advance and advance the global community can collaborate of cost, free is on-boarded, a biotechnology Once community. manuscript development funding, open biotechnologies, integrates Therapoid in an open way. the science a unified and blockchain into artificial open data, intelligence, open access, Server, prePrint Review, prePeer to come together, share knowledge and access technologies that will drive the next generation of pharmaceutical, the next of pharmaceutical, will drive that generation technologies knowledge share and access together, come to the global to freely biotechnologies open licensed provides Therapoid innovation. and therapeutic healthcare popularity and necessity. However, widespread adoption of these practices has not yet been achieved. To create a create To been achieved. adoption of these practices has not yet widespread However, popularity and necessity. as an online Therapoid is building Therapeutics Open research, of scientific flow the free for platform transparent community development the drug and therapeutic across stakeholders from allows that platform crowdsourcing system that is both expensive and uncertain. Similarly, academic scientists face issues such as reduced funding; issues such as reduced face academic scientists and uncertain. is both expensive that Similarly, system should collaboration Scientific barriers; crisis etc. and communication replication system; peer review broken in growing and other open scholarship practices are open source, open data, Open access, no borders. have The pharmaceutical industry faces a host of worsening problems: Multibillion-dollar industry pharmaceutical problems: The and decade- a host of worsening expenses faces and a patent new drug candidates, for rates market, high failure bring new drugs to times to long development Authors: Li Guo, Open Therapeutics Open Li Guo, Authors: Therapoid: a new online platform for scientific collaboration around biotechnologies around collaboration scientific for a new online platform Therapoid: SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Science Team Science Panel. Science Team Science conduct their consensus report on the science of team science, “Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science,” and Team Science,” of “Enhancing the Effectiveness conduct report science, their consensus of team on the science in Science Contributions Team of Recognition “Improving report, science of Medical team Sciences the Academy of Health Academy library the Canadian the primary for and constitutes reference Careers,” Biomedical Research the library in its entirety. The Mendeley Science of Team Science (SciTS) Library is the source of references for the for Science (SciTS) Library of references is the source Team Mendeley of Science The the library its entirety. in of Science to Academy of the National Council Research the National used by was Toolkit, Science Team NIH’s Desktop software providing over 2,000 references, most curated and organized into over three dozen practice- dozen three over into and organized most curated references, 2,000 over softwareDesktop providing the library to in member of the community can directly add references any a public group, As folders. oriented can access with a basic Mendeley profile and anyone new folders, fashion, including creating a crowdsourcing Mendeley Science of Team Science (SciTS) Library–https://www.mendeley.com/community/science-of-team- Science Team Mendeley of Science and science on team of empirical literature source and authoritative science-(scits)/–is the most comprehensive Mendeley the free web and through via the available group public world. It is a free, in the collaboration scientific acceleration. Consequently, it is imperative that team science leaders and practitioners can easily draw from the from leaders and practitioners science draw can easily team that it is imperative Consequently, acceleration. The science. team of praxis the most effective base for as an evidence literature science of team science growing by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) have demonstrated that that demonstrated Institutes have of Health (NIH) and National (NSF) Science Foundation the National by at least time, more takes team science result, As a costs. coordination significant entail initiatives science team research terms of in a distal payoff demonstrated also studies have however, than individual research; proximally, science initiatives, while external funding agencies in the United States and around the globe have made more made more the globe have and around while externalStates in the United funding agencies initiatives, science funded centers on research Studies funding opportunities science and team-based available. collaborative Team science initiatives are characterized by cross-disciplinary collaboration focused on complex problem-, problem-, cross-disciplinary complex on by characterized focused are initiatives collaboration science Team in team an upsurge has generated academia Over last decade, the or product-orientedproject-, research. Day 1: Monday, June 12 90 When Scientific Matters:EvidenceReally Policy Windows Surrounding ChildhoodObesity policies inJapanandtheUnited States Advancing international research collaborations: Acomparative studyofpublic research funding gather thedegree to which thenews mediacovered thetopic ofchildhood obesity, databases while third-party researchers sponsorsandtheiruse ofevidence. to identify policy Additionally, news databases were to queried andscientific interventions basedevidence.between policy Congressional bills were retrieved and coded by processes.is utilized inpolicy processes Understanding how evidence canhelpnarrow isusedinpolicy the gap congressional billsfrom 2001to to 2014onthetopic understandhow ofchildhoodobesity evidence shapesand rates,childhood obesity andtheresulting thisresearch turn, socialandeconomic In impacts. usesdata on tochallenges facingCongressional increasing to address issuespertaining membersworking complex policy rely ondiverse teams to address theresulting coordination. challengesofknowledge This studylooksat the When that challengesarise require from organizations knowledge multiple domainsofexpertise, increasingly Authors: Teis Matthew M.Kristensen, Weber, and Itzak Yanovitzky, Rutgers University studies addressing theneedsofunderstandingpublicresearch fundingpoliciesacross nations. gaps amongresearchers ininternational to research participate collaborations. This studywillcontribute to the researchers international to conduct research. to access addition,theinequality research In resources would yield internationalkey infrastructure research orpolices to support collaborations could bepotential challengesfor The publicresearch fundingpoliciesare crucialto advance science; however, theabsence ofconsistent public international research collaborations. thetimeofconference, By Iwillhave more specific research findings. research advancesSome policiesdefinedetailedguidelinesandsetspecificobjectives to theSciTSfield: promote and regulations oninternational research collaborations. offindingsand Statement ofhow the (3)Summary research collaborations, on international research 2)funding opportunities collaborations, and3)guidelines publicly available sources. This studyappliestheorganizational analysis 1)policiesoninternational criteria: identify potential challengesininternational research collaborations. The data andpoliciesare from collected Japan andtheUnited States. The ofthisstudyare purposes to analyze thegovernment agencies’ policiesand on examining theexisting publicresearch fundingpoliciesofthefour independent government agenciesin translational, clinical, andotherresearch. ofresearch (2)Description methods: based This studyisprimarily research research by providing fundingto researchers primary andresearch basic, facilitiesto conduct applied, JapanandtheUnited States,In thenational andfederal government roles agencieshave to advance important research fundingsystems are to critical allocate resources andpromote international research collaborations. collaborations andadvance international cooperation inscience. The responsibilities androles ofthepublic research fundingpoliciesofthenational andfederal government agenciesto promote international research (1) Objective, problem underinvestigation, hypothesis orresearch goal: This studyexamines andcompares the Authors: Takehito University ofMinnesota Kamata, Poster 5 Poster 4 SciTS 2017Conference: Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 91 Poster Abstracts Poster Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Poster 7 Poster Poster 6 Poster Science”—dedicated to parental separation and stepfamilies, this presentation highlights the processes that that the processes highlights this presentation and stepfamilies, separation parental to Science”—dedicated our assessments, by light to brought processes, These this undertaking, it. facilitated hindered as those that as well Authors: Marie-Christine, Saint-Jacques, Caroline Robitaille, Annick, S-Amand, and Dainel Turcotte and Dainel Annick, Robitaille, S-Amand, Marie-Christine, Caroline Authors: Saint-Jacques, partnership—“Team interdisciplinary research a large, establishing and managing Based on our experience by the CCI in relation to other similar NCI-supported to types in relation research of activitieswith translational associated the CCI by awards. and P01 activities were slightly lower as compared to those for “alal funded” R01s (mean 14.4, SD=4.4) and “all “all R01s (mean 14.4, SD=4.4) and funded” “alal those for to as compared lower slightly and P01 activities were of the P50/SPOREs as determined effectiveness superior cost to point data The P01s (mean 17.8, SD=6.5). funded” different types of translational awards, the P50/SPOREs featured the highest CCI (mean 32.9, SD=12.2) followed by followed CCI (mean 32.9, SD=12.2) the highest featured the P50/SPOREs awards, types of translational different Translational project (mean 15.2, SD=3.3). least one translational included at that project grants the P01 program subsets of R01 in translational CCIs The of 11.7 (SD=2.9). the mean CCI with the least productive were R01 grants citations attributed to publications supported by a specific grant activity in a given grant year. For each of the year. grant activity supported publications grant to specific a given attributed in a by citations the number of citations representing (CCI) the activity-specific cost index then calculated citation we years, three Among R01, P01, or P50/SPORE awards. of group in the targeted invested cost total per $100,000 produced years 2009, 2010 and 2011. Initial data were collected from IMPAC II databases using QVR. The initial dataset initial dataset The using QVR. II databases IMPAC collected from 2009, 2010 and 2011. Initial were data years activity number of each grant and the cumulative in 2009, 2010, or 2011, for incurred cost included the total have become an increasingly important policies and of scientific an increasingly in the assessment become objective component have projects supported research cancer of translational bibliometric analysis report we a comparative Here, programs. activities the NCI in fiscal by grant Excellence) Research of Programs R01, P01, or P50/SPORE (Specialized through Prolonged stagnation of the available biomedical research budgets accentuated the need to support the need to the most budgets accentuated biomedical research of the available stagnation Prolonged Bibliometric approaches mechanisms. funding cost effective through areas scientific and promising productive Authors: Igor Kuzmin, Leah Hubbard, Julia Artnold, Andrew Hruszkewycz, Steven Nothwehr, Melissa Antman and MelissaAntman Nothwehr, Hruszkewycz, Julia Artnold, Steven Andrew Hubbard, Leah Igor Kuzmin, Authors: Institute Cancer National Ujhazy, Peter Examination of processes that contributed to the success of a research partnership of a research in Canada the success to contributed that of processes Examination in its development key moments three through Program Project Grant Mechanisms Outperform (P01 and P50/SPOREs) Grant Project R01 Program Productivity in Citation Grants Project Research SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: to be acted as a key factorto upon, and further context impacting the importance the to points environmental of in policyfunctioning teams of diverse contexts. available government research were examined within and across years. Analysis suggests that policy windows are policy suggests that are Analysis windows years. within and across examined were research government available policy for windows is central of evidence body a preexisting but that in political power changes around formed were used to gather the number of government research reports available to legislators. The relationships relationships The legislators. reports to available research government the number of gather to used were and coverage, media news evidence, research use of global characteristicsbetween sponsorship networks, of the Day 1: Monday, June 12 92 seem to have contributed to thistransition. Continuation ofwinningstrategies, combined withthecreation ofadifferent ofaproject natureby all, supported this challenge. The presentation willalsooutlinestrategies usedto foster evolution oftheteam over time. to to learn work together anddevelop ashared visionofthesituation ofthesefamilieshelpedto overcome establishing procedures for research governance production, that allow andmobilization ofknowledge members 2008) isessential, itincludeschallengesthat ourcase, canhinderthesmoothoperation ofapartnership.In to provide Moreover, expertise. abalance distance between critical andphysical ifseeking proximity (Lapointe, fostered development ofthisproject. Partner organizations leadershipand are inintellectual askedto participate organizations withcommunity research andastrong commitment isseenashaving partnership by partners, (Gibbons etal., 1994). This way ofworking, combined witharesearch context andCanada inQuebec that favours ofknowledge,strategy amajorundercurrent andtheco-creation promoting intheworld action ofresearch consensus regarding research thethemesandissuesto alsoledto prioritize. thedevelopment It ofaparticipatory and itscontinuation over in2008,theanalysis that time. ledto establishingthisteam Starting helpedto create a will beexamined withemphasisonthree keymoments inourteam’s development: itsorigin, itsimplementation Collaboration intheLoosely Coupled Academy engaging theirlooselycoupled unitsincollaborative intheachievement action ofinstitution-widegoals. dynamics andcollaboration inhighereducation. The findingsofthisstudyprovide data that canaidinstitutionsin was determined by theircongruence to theevidence gathered from reviews oftheliterature outlining group collaborative goalattainment at thislarge, looselycoupled research university. The significance ofthesethemes presence andmanagement andthepresence ofconflict, ofasuperordinate goaldelineate what constitutes of theunits, thecollaborative processes ofthegroup, thecommitment oftheunitsto theinstitutional goal, the five elementsaction, proved significant intheachievement ofinstitutionalgoals. The processes andperformance forcollected thisstudyrevealed that whenconsidering how looselycoupled university unitsemploy concerted ofthecampus,derived from documents andarchival observation individualinterviews, direct records. The data institution to infuseentrepreneurial throughout principles theinstitution. The data for collected thisstudywas faculty, staff, andadministrators at alarge state theiracquisition university during ofa grant which required the phenomenon, thisstudyutilized aqualitative casestudymethodologyto explore thecollaborative ofthe efforts more data that iscollected explains how collaboration happensat alooselycoupled university. To examine this is noted to rely heavily oninstitutions’ to foster ability collaboration amongstitsmany components, itisvitalthat avoid redundant andprotect access efforts andaffordability. When that considering thefuture ofhighereducation proceduresand regulatory have increased. Collaboration isbeingtouted asameansto improve student learning, goals. Today’s highereducation institutionsare beingaskedto domore withlessasresources have decreased This research examines how looselycoupled university unitscollaborate intheachievement ofinstitutionalwide Authors: Tierini D. Hodges-Murad, Education Leadership Higher Poster 8 SciTS 2017Conference: Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 93 Poster Abstracts Poster Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Poster 10 Poster Poster 9 Poster beginning of the summer term 2017 comprising up to approximately 80 - 90 participants. Preliminary results will will 80 - 90 participants. results Preliminary approximately up to 2017 comprising of the summer term beginning by science of team the science to contributes outlined above questionnaire The out and discussed. be sketched shaped. within a jointly context particularlyteamwork dedicated instrument an assessment to analyze offering between the occupational groups involved. These interactions patters provide additional insights regarding the regarding additional insights provide patters interactions These involved. groups the occupational between the will be conducted at questionnaire The teams. within the development of transdisciplinarydegree integration to operationalize these dimensions. They cover aspects such as knowledge integration, team learning, social social learning, team aspects such as knowledge integration, cover They these dimensions. operationalize to satisfaction. teamwork and goal orientation collective behavior, trustworthiness, cooperative perceived cohesion, interaction In addition, an ego-centric of cooperative of patterns the reconstruction allows network analysis developed by Jahn, Bergmann, and Keil (2012) and Felt’s (2009) concept of epistemic living space. Its core Its core living space. of epistemic (2009) concept and Keil (2012) and Felt’s Jahn, Bergmann, by developed been adapted Established scales have the social and the organizational. the epistemic, dimensions comprise within a culture of togetherness and on equal footing. In order to conduct accompanying research on these research conduct to In accompanying order and on equal footing. of togetherness within a culture which is particularly the notion developed transdisciplinary was capture to a questionnaire designed teams the dimensions of integration by is inspired of the questionnaire framework conceptual The space’. ‘third of various groups of actors from the university as well as local schools, teacher training seminars and extra-school training teacher as local schools, as well the university of actors from various groups self- assess the project’s is to of the ZZL-Network research partners. A particular the accompanying challenge for interact these actor groups 2010) where (Bhabha, 1996; Zeichner, space’ ‘third aim of establishing a proclaimed The project ZZL-Network at the center for teacher education, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany, is Germany, Lüneburg, University Leuphana education, teacher for the center at project ZZL-Network The together bringing by system education teacher of the consecutive integration a better achieve to dedicated Authors: Robin Straub, ZZL-Network / Methodology Center ZZL-Network Robin Straub, Authors: generate deep trust, and maintain effective working relationships in service to goals that matter to the scientists to the scientists working in service relationships matter that to goals effective and maintain deep trust, generate them. achieve striving to Journeys that create shared values and allow work structures to organize based on self-management have have based on self-management organize structures to work and allow values shared create that Journeys and Kimberley Brown impact. high capacity Mery for displayed theater, Miguez, in social presencing trained vision, shared activate to exploring ways new are and leadership, self-managed teams for Magnan, a trainer (Jay Forrester). According to Jaime Lester, co-author (with Adrianna Kezar) of ‘Organizing Higher Education for Higher for Education ‘Organizing co-author Kezar) of (with Adrianna Jaime Lester, to According (Jay Forrester). Learning matters. structure work we and how matters, believe we what matters, value we what Collaboration,’ We wish to prototype the building of teams that have built a shared goal and developed trust-based relationships relationships trust-based goal and developed built a shared have that of teams the building prototype wish to We bydeveloped Otto U, Theory projectseffectively and sustainably. complex to take on challenging, sufficient thinking dynamics in systems Scharmer School the MIT Sloan at rooted is philosophically of Management, Authors: Kennan Salinero, Kimberley Brown Magnan and Mery Magnan Kimberley Brown Miguez, Kennan Salinero, ReImagineAuthors: Science How to Capture Transdisciplinary Cooperation and Integration in Teacher Education? Introducing Introducing Education? Teacher in and Integration Cooperation Transdisciplinary Capture to How the ZZL-Network at Teamwork Transdisciplinary on Research Accompanying for a Questionnaire Theory U Applied to Science: What’s Possible? Possible? What’s Theory Science: to U Applied SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Day 1: Monday, June 12 94 transferable teamwork to othertransdisciplinary settings. ‘third space’. Although itisdeveloped andappliedwithinthecontext ofteacher education itisconsidered to be Integration, andCollaboration (MATRICx) for Mechanism Developing theMotivation Assessment aSelf-Scoring for Team Readiness, prototypes for transdisciplinary effective team science andsociety: Geomatics list ofmotivators anddeterrents to collaboration that were developed into 6domainsofcollaborative functioning tool inteam andmaintenance. reflection Methods. A review ofthe team science literature was used to compile a Readiness, Integration, andCollaboration (MATRICx) instrument for individualsandteams to beableto usethe The ofthework objective isto develop atranslational self-scoring sheetfor theMotivation Assessment for Team Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Elsevier, John Liu, George LisaSchwartz, Washington University Authors: Alexandra Rosenberg, R.Lotrecchiano, Gaetano and Trudy George Mallinson, Washington University, to share someofthemostvaluable to lessonslearned document effectiveSci of teamscience. that have to bemobilize. prototypes-The ofthis lineofresearch achievements sixty -over give ustheopportunity between anddecision thescientificand information, asabridge frameworktools put act andthepolicy forward possible solution. The spatial approach usedto represent andgeo-technology andcommunicate theirknowledge The clueisto from consider compromised tacitandexplicit knowledge thesocialactors intheproblem andinthe are convened inacollaborative to participate teamwork for learning, discussion,consensus andscenario building. we reveal stakeholders enquiry Social thecomplexity ofthecontext anditsspatial functionality, Methodology: ponder theproblems addressed inresearch /planningandthepotentialities oftheirsolutions. At that level of environment,urban etc. ourdesign andmodelingprocess, In isat theterritoriallevel that we canidentify and global problems, suchasclimate change, energy, water, resources management, health,education, food systems, team develops conceptual andtechnological prototypes to address socialdemandsrelated to local, regional or andgeo-technology.(3) Cybernetics; (4)ICT Through aqualitative framework inter theSci andtransdisciplinary geomatic solutions: (1) Territory and spatial analysis; (2) Complex for and principles systems management; thinking andgeospatial informationknowledge management, for thedesign anddevelopment ofprototypes and geographic information. Objective: The teams´ paperemphasisesthebuildingblocksthat gearthemodelofSci incorporating continuous technological developments intheacquisition, processing andmanagement of differentknowledge, sources of meaning, representation and communication oftheprocesses involved, while tofrontiers conceptualize ofthedisciplinesthat itbecamenecessary abroader science that would integrate systems isprecisely dimensions. intheterritory, inthe It emphasizingspace-time socio-economic-ecological CONACYT, Mexico. mainachievement hasbeenoninnovative It´s methodsandtools advanced for thestudyof framework developed years thepasttwenty isatransdisciplinary during at CentroGeo- andsociety Geomatics Authors: Paras Margarita andFernando Lopez, CentroGeo –CONACYT Poster 12 Poster 11 SciTS 2017Conference: Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 95 Poster Abstracts Poster Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for External evaluators used a quasi-experimental design to assess the implementation, effectiveness, and impact effectiveness, used a quasi-experimental assess the implementation, External to evaluators design and students. project on educators of the CCERS Increase students’ knowledge of and interest in STEM+C knowledge of and interest Increase students’ conditions. local environmental to projects as suited other restoration model for a replicable Develop Increase quality and effectiveness of STEM+C teaching and learning of STEM+C Increase quality and effectiveness knowledge and instructional skill Increase teachers’ Poster 13 Poster • Description of research methods: Description of research • • • • improve the digital platform, and incorporate new partners from other disciplines (e.g., law & policy). law new partners other disciplines (e.g., and incorporate from platform, the digital improve Objectives: and community groups. The educational model is envisioned as a set of five programmatic pillars in which programmatic as a set of five model is envisioned educational The and community groups. on complementary focused activities, and implement and exhibits lessons, create partners to collaborate to has been obtained an additional Smart grant (SCC) Communities & Connected Now, science. restoration STEM-C education in public middle schools. The lessons engage students and teachers in long term restoration restoration in long term and teachers lessons engage students The STEM-C in public middle schools. education STEM professionals, scientists, citizen with peers, projects monitoring in collaboration and environmental ecology Watson-Currie (2016) discussed the CCERS partnership, a three-year education research project. New data New data project. research a three-year partnership, education (2016) discussed the CCERS Watson-Currie a curriculum enhance to develop working to having together are impact organizations these ten illustrates Authors: Erica Watson-Currie, SmartStart & Research Watson-Currie, Evaluation Erica Authors: Curriculum + Community Enterprise for Restoration Science (CCERS) Science Restoration for Enterprise + Community Curriculum SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: for a digital platform (in development) that will serve as a mobile access point for the MATRICx as well as portal as well in the MATRICx for will serve point that as a mobile access (in development) platform a digital for project. with the MATRICx the collection associated of data continue which to related to collaboration in knowledge producing teams. In addition, this practical tool will allow for strategies to to strategies In for addition, this practical will allow teams. in knowledge tool producing collaboration to related sheet is the bases the scoring Lastly, teams. and assembling developing building useful to team for be developed The self-scoring graphical framework will be used as part of the technical development of the MATRICx mobile as part will be used of the MATRICx framework development graphical of the technical self-scoring The for sheet of a self-scoring The development the SciTS field. advances the research of how Statement application. understanding motivations for usable tool with scientists team is the nextthis assessment phase of providing graphical context usable by individuals and teams to establish the degrees and depth of collaborative motivation. motivation. and depth of collaborative degrees establish the to individuals and teams usable by context graphical tool MATRICx of the advancement technological for the basis sheet provides The self-scoring Summary findings. of further collect for and to data teams research. use by for as a mobile application and promoted be designed to have contributed to the development of a self-scoring scale that maps individual participant motivators for maps individual participant scale that for of a self-scoring motivators the development to contributed have functioning a in domains of collaborative and along the experience of collaborative against degree collaboration structure, unidimensionality, and person-item fit of responses from 150 participants. Items were analyzed applying analyzed 150 participants.were from responses fit of Items person-item and unidimensionality, structure, of a hierarchy provided analysis data 2013). Pilot (Linacre, 3.80.1 Winsteps® Rascha 1-parameter model using iterations Several 2016). Results. (Mallinson et al., framework which make up the MATRICx threats and motivators in health and biomedical teams (Lotrecchiano et al., 2016). This list informed the development of 55 indicators of 55 indicators the development list informed This 2016). et al., (Lotrecchiano and biomedical teams in health scale rating the investigate Rasch used to spectrum was analysis of collaboration. a hierarchical representing Day 1: Monday, June 12 96 • • • • • offindings: Summary • • An Evidence for Model BasedCompetency Team Science Training Council (Cooke 2015)hascalled for &Hilton, moreto develop efforts authentic team science training, andthus Brooks,(Delise, Gorman, etal., Rentsch, &Steele-Johnson, 2010;Salas 2008).However, theNational Research et al., 2008). The available evidence canbeincreased suggestthat team through performance team training Konradt, (Hertel, & team skills Voss, 2006),aswell team asinterdisciplinary health research competencies (Gebbie (Salas,2009), majorteam factors Sims, &Burke, 2005),teamwork (Rousseau, Aubé, skills &Savole, 2006),virtual Tannenbaum, Salas, & Volpe, 1995),specific attitudes, behaviors, and cognitions (Salas,Rosen, Burke,Goodwin, & There are numerous team modelsavailable andabilities(Cannon-Bowers, basedknowledge, skills, depicting evidence basedguidance for thedevelopment oftraining programs for leadersandmembersofscientific teams. The ofthisposter purpose isto thedevelopment describe model designed ofacompetency specifically to provide Branch, Lori A. Wiseman, University of Texas Branch Medical University, R.Salazar, Maritza HudaSarraj, University ofCalifornia Allan R.Brasier, Irvine, University of Texas Medical Authors: KevinC. Wooten, University ofHouston ClearLake, Eduardo Salas, University, Rice Lant,Theresa Pace K. Poster 14 knowledge items wereknowledge greater scores thanknowledge for students incontrol group. improvement astheirteachers’ increased. 2teachers knowledge scores 2016,students Spring ofCohort on indicated exit surveys Brief theirscores items increased onknowledge eachsemester indicator (anindirect of withinteractive fieldtrips teachersexhibits designed began taking to complement developing curriculum. Pillar 5:Community Exhibits– Year to 1,prior receiving any CCERS 1 students lessons oractivities, ofCohort instruments were usedalthoughfewer lessonsandresources were provided. increased relative to control group; however, increases were more modestthanPillar 2assameevaluation Mentoring–Students’ (OST) Pillar 4:Out-of-School andself-ratings for knowledge confidence science abilities to bepresentedscience reports at annualsymposium. collective database. Onlinedashboard enablesstudents to analyze data from allsites, for andcreate charts scientists test water quality, monitor site conditions, othermeasurements, andcollect thenuploaddata to a Pillar 3:Digital Platform –Ongoingincrease incapabilities, resources, andusage:Students andcitizen improved, whereas control increased students confidence. didnotreport test scores test thancontrol onknowledge group; Also, confidence theirself-reported inscience ability Pillar 2:Student Learning 1teachers -Students receiving ofCohort CCERS achieved curriculum higherpost- usageofBybee’sby self-reported 5Emethods. environmental increased asindicated skills to justice facilitate andability experimental scenarios; Instruction Pillar 1: Teacher 1teachers’ Development –Cohort content increased, knowledge greatest increases in model, aswell asthecontribution ofeachcomponent. As data for 2016-17becomes available researchers willinvestigate oftheeducational thecollective impact datasets to compare findingsindifferent pillars. Researchers created composite items from theevaluation questionnaires, andusedthecorresponding SciTS 2017Conference: Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 97 Poster Abstracts Poster Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Poster 16 Poster Poster 15 Poster Ethics has been largely overlooked in the science of team science. Yet ethics and ethical decision-making have and ethical decision-making ethics have Yet science. of team in the science overlooked has been largely Ethics ethical analyze individual STEM researchers seeking understand how better to in research concerns been central Authors: Jonathan Beever, University of Central Florida of Central University Beever, Jonathan Authors: principles and contents. the service aspect of the team project help them propose ways to solve real world agribusiness problems. This This problems. agribusiness world real solve the service to ways aspect project help them propose of the team new education, agricultural especially those in to peer educators, provide to the SciTS field advances research learning of agribusiness understanding about the impact service of team-based learning students’ on expanding students (89%) believed that they understand the course contents better when the contents are related to a real a real to related are when the contents better contents they understand the course that believed (89%) students in school as years as well experience of work 2) years learned in a team; are and when the contents situation life communityreported in service; (94%) respondents that 3) almost all involvement team’s affect the positively conducted in spring 2017 from 86 agribusiness students taking the advanced agribusiness application course. taking course. students application 86 agribusiness agribusiness conducted in spring 2017 from the advanced show: results 1) A majorityThe of presented. model are logit a conditional from and results statistics Preliminary when the contents are related to a real life situation, to be assigned to a team? 2) What factors will affect the team’s factorsteam’s will affect the What 2) a team? to be assigned to situation, life a real to related are when the contents in community service? 3) will the service And helpful in involvement aspect project be considered of the team face-to-face Anonymous survey problems? agribusiness solve was to new ways in proposing assisting students feedback on this team project in order to identify means to improve agribusiness teaching and enhance students’ students’ and enhance teaching agribusiness improve means to identify to project in order on this team feedback better contents understand course includes: 1) will students under investigation Problems networks. collaborative Fresno State agribusiness department is among the first to incorporate service learning as a required team project service department agribusiness required to incorporate State learning as a is among the first Fresno students’ and analyze gather study aims to The course. application agribusiness of an advanced its teaching into Authors: Pei Xu, California State University Fresno University State California Xu, Pei Authors: Ethics and the Science of Team Science Team of and the Science Ethics Course: A Case Study from Fresno, CA Fresno, from Study A Case Course: Incorporating Team-based Service Learning in the Teaching of An Agribusiness Application Application Agribusiness of An Teaching Service in the Learning Team-based Incorporating SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: used to make an intervention into mature teams requiring situation-specific assistance. situation-specific requiring teams mature make an intervention into used to either developmental or evaluative rubrics. Advancement of SciTS Field: The proposed recursive and interrelated and interrelated recursive proposed The of SciTS Field: Advancement rubrics. evaluative or either developmental or can be teams, scientific of nascent development guide the general it can be used to that model is unique in (Liang, Farh, & Farh, 2012; Salazar, Lant, Fiore, & Salas, 2012); 2) Inquiring and Probing (Huber & Lewis, 2010; Marks, Marks, 2010; (Huber & Lewis, 2) Inquiring 2012); & Salas, and Probing Fiore, Lant, 2012; Salazar, & Farh, Farh, (Liang, This & Bunderson, 2005; Klein, 2005). Vegt, (Van and Integrating and 3) Reframing 2001); der & Zaccaro, Mathieu, can be used as which each distinct markers for competency, behavioral numerous for competency model provides from evidence provided by both general team literature as well as relevant team science literature. For example, example, For literature. science team as relevant as well literature team general both by provided evidence from Voice 1) Sharing Unique Information/Promotive involves: Exchange and Awareness the competency involving team science specific competency models are needed. Figure 1 depicts our overall model and the different sets different model and the 1 depictsoverall Figure our competencyneeded. specific models are science team model is built This within each competency set. 2 depicts competencies the three Figure and of competencies, Day 1: Monday, June 12 98 components. Conceptual precursorcurriculum. analysis to coherence ofits data-driven isanecessary ofethicaldecision-making demandscollaborativeof ethicaldecision-making approaches withinthedisciplinesandscaffolding withinthe reasoning, andmotivation form for anintegrated ethicaldecision-making. necessary ofskills triad The complexity an issueasethicalinthefirstplace, andthenhow reasoning translates through into motivation.Sensitivity, action intoconflicts relief. pushbeyond ethical Questions ofskill reasoning to consider how onebecomes sensitive to ethics, donotnecessarily align withpersonalvalues orsocietalnorms. Considering thesepotential scalebrings with societalandprofessional ethicalstandards. Professional standards, evidenced for example by codes of commitments are embeddedinresearch questions andcontexts. ofscalecompare Questions personalmorals address societalimplications. Finally, athird level ofscope focuses ontheways inwhichnormative/value-driven 2014.)At anotherlevel,over ofresearch broader traditional (McCormack andGarvin practices RCR impacts (Note that at least onestudyhasargued that team-based canoffer learning gainsinethicaldecision-making, applies. At onelevel,inquiry ethicsconcern academicintegrity orregulatory institutionalandcontextual issues. applies to research teams. address at ofscope Questions what inethicaldecision-making level ofanalysis ethical through ascaffoldedmaking approach ofscale, scope, andthenoutlineshow thisindividualisticmodel andskill applyinteam science? does ethicaldecision-making This presentation lays outthecomplexity ofethicaldecision- for thescience for ofteam science: (1)whatcollaborative isethicaldecision-making STEMresearch?, and(2)how relevant issuesandformulate normatively-appropriate actions. This evidences at disconnect leasttwo problems Measuring ProposalMeasuring NeedsandAllocating SufficientResearch Support communicate anddocument thesteps to asuccessful proposal. above systems are aresponse to assistresearch that stretch offices with andclearly theircapacity workloads to take onnewproposals. caneasilydetermine his/hercapacity research staffmember and/orsupervisor The easily tracks progress to completion. The entire research office caneasilybeassessedsothat a capacity work to evolve solutionsthrough acollaborative effort. Additionally, thissystem increases thepace ofsolutionsand andanagile system: management Method project software Akeycomponentof theKanban ofagile systems is (3) proposalThe tasks. withadeadlineandtheresponsible adaptation party; Eachtaskislisted onthechecklist are determined,services thePIand research staffdetermine theindividualswhoare responsible for meetingthe needs;(2) with staff time Proposalto meettheservice role assignments: Checklists Once the research office night hoursto meetdeadlines. Additionally, allows theresearch useofthechecklist office toallocate sufficient alleviates alast-minutechecklist request for research that office require services research staff towork into the systems: Proposal indicating thePIsdesired (1)Initial research Checklist Meeting office services: Thismeetingand each proposal, theUniversity of West Research Florida of andSponsored Office Programs is testingthe following pointingIn order fingersandfrustration. to set roles, expectations, and research office stafftimeneeded for front planningandforgoing androles theestablishment ofexpectations canleadto adeadlineday that involves shouldnotbeahindranceResearch staffcapacity to asuccessful grant application. Unfortunately, alackofup- VandenbergMonica Authors: Poster 17 SciTS 2017Conference: Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 99 Poster Abstracts Poster Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Poster 19 Poster Poster 18 Poster or create other problems” (Rittel and Webber 1973). The process of defining a problem and identifying possible and identifying of defining a problem process The 1973). Webber (Rittel and other problems” or create to solve because of incomplete, contradictory and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize. recognize. to often difficult are that contradictory requirements and changing because of incomplete, solve to reveal one aspect may effort the to solve of a wicked problem interdependencies, because of complex Moreover, Over the past few decades the role of design has grown in both industry being are Designers has grown and practice. of design decades the role Over the past few tasked with understanding and solving are that join and lead interdisciplinary teams called upon to increasingly difficult or impossible “Wicked are problems ‘wicked problems’. as to very societal issues often referred large Authors: Maeve Donohue, Northeastern Donohue, Maeve University Authors: developed a strong collaboration among a very team. diverse collaboration a strong developed team science to further research in craniofacial conditions. Through this collaboration, we have gained insights gained insights have we this collaboration, Through conditions. further in craniofacial to science team research and small number of participants conditions, with rare sets on a relatively data complex accruing methods for into incorporated existing resources (e.g. team science toolkit, PhenX common data elements, etc) whenever possible. possible. whenever etc) elements, data toolkit, common science PhenX team (e.g. resources existing incorporated methods for develop to and continue and in person meetings, meetings, teleconference conduct regular We a unique model for network provides FACIAL The Conclusions: in authorship and scholarship. recognition shared participants, including cases, controls, and parents. We completed 14 institutional and state IRB applications, and IRB applications, 14 institutional and state completed We and parents. controls, participants, including cases, and a series study protocols, of procedures, manuals of operating databases, collection data tools, developed included experts from the following disciplines: Biostatistics, Clinical Study Management, Epidemiology, Dental, Dental, Epidemiology, Management, Clinical Study Biostatistics, disciplines: included experts the following from Summary and Reconstructive Surgery. Plastic Pediatrics, Otolaryngology, and Maxillofacial Oral Surgery, Genetics, 600 study over enrolled support and have NIH funding to continuous this research, received have We of Findings: underdevelopment of the facial structures, most commonly the ear and mandible. Children with CFM often CFM with Children mandible. the ear and most commonly of the facial structures, underdevelopment does of care on standards and consensus available studies are outcome few yet multiple surgeries, undergo team multi-institutional research Our founding study CFM. network to FACIAL launched Innot exist. 2009, we Facial Asymmetry Collaborative for Interdisciplinary Assessment and Learning (FACIAL) network. Methods: (FACIAL) Interdisciplinary and Learning for Assessment Asymmetry Collaborative Facial births of 1:5,600 live and involves with a prevalence condition is a congenital (CFM) microsomia Craniofacial longitudinal care for children with congenital and acquired conditions of the head and neck. However, the of the head and neck. conditions However, and acquired with congenital children for care longitudinal assess objective is to of this study The in the US. teams craniofacial new to is relatively science of team concept of the evaluation through network among such teams a research of building and expanding the progress University of Washington, Mark Urata, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Daniela Vivaldi, University of North of University Vivaldi, Carolina Daniela Angeles, Los Hospital Mark Children’s Urata, Washington, of University coordinated, provide that teams among craniofacial Objective: Multidisciplinary concept is an intuitive clinical care Los Angeles, Lauren A. Kilpatrick, University of North Carolina, Daniela Luquetti, University of Washington, Seattle, Seattle, Washington, A. Kilpatrick, Lauren of University of North University Angeles, Daniela Luquetti, Los Carolina, Stueckle, Laura Washington, of North Saltzman, University of University Babette Marina Rampazzo, Carolina, Authors: Amelia F. Drake, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Scott Bartlett, Children’s Hospital of of North University Hill, Scott Bartlett, Chapel Drake, Carolina, Children’s F. Amelia Authors: Hospital Children’s Johns, Alessia Washington, of University Carrie Heike, Birgfeld, Craig Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Co-design models for addressing complex societal challenges complex Co-design addressing models for Team science and the FACIAL network: facilitating clinical research in craniofacial macrosomia craniofacial in network: clinical research facilitating and the FACIAL science Team SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Day 1: Monday, June 12 100 societal issues. implementation inorder canbeavaluable to approach better understandhow to solvingcomplex co-design methods andapproaches to involving stakeholdersinthedesign interdisciplinary process from research to people andfindthesuitablemethod, techniques and tools to reach that goal. This poster willmodeldifferent design to process definetheapproach, itisnecessary context andthegoal, engage the aparticipatory relevantIn that strives to involve actively allstakeholdersofanissueinthedesign process from research to implementation. design for individuals traditionally referred to as ‘users’ approach co-design into hasbegunto aparticipatory shift design process hasevolved inresponse to thesecomplex problems. The user-centered approach where experts comprehensive understandingofthecontext surrounding anissueinorder to identify possiblesolutions. The teamAn interdisciplinary approach isrequired to merge andapproaches multipleperspectives into amore regardless orcreativity, ofintellect cannotfullycomprehend orsolve problems ofthisscope ontheirown. ofproblems,these types creativity isneededto design newapproaches. However, anindividualstakeholder, solutions cannotbeseparated linearphases. order into In to distinct comprehend andformulate solutionsfor coordination care teamPrimary workflow analysis to improve medication reconciliation communication and Communication gaps Findings: PC team members. workflow maps were created and compared team to detect workflow communication gapsanddeviations among wereObservations across conducted PCteams over 6weeks hours. for Ideal-state 20observation andobserved process was pilot-tested inthePCoffice. andrevised usingvideosimulations and4hoursofpilotobservations The MRprocess withinaPCoffice. was observed A data with60 collectionform dataelements fortheMR Methods: collaborative for PCteam membersto opportunities improve medication useandsafety. (2)identify workflow carereconciliation (PC), gapsanddeviations, and(3) (MR)inprimary recommend carePilot team memberworkflows to: project (1)examine primary and communications for medication Steckowych, Andrew Stevens,Authors: Smith,Kathryn Marie University ofConnecticut Poster 20 2. 1. • • Data Verification: • • Data Collection Patient information verification self-reported was (62%) documented withoutfurther (100%) Community pharmacies/prescribers were MRprocess notcontacted during to verify medication use Patient preferences allergies (20%)orpharmacy (28%) were notrecorded. questionswere usedintheMRprocess (77%) Close-ended SciTS 2017Conference: Poster Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 1: Monday, June 12 101 ecological issues, and as a result the the and as a result issues, ecological state New England Sustainability state Poster Abstracts Poster making through science communication. Drawing on the concept on the concept Drawing ­making communication. science through Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for term and ongoing ethnography of our collaborative organization. This effortThis is part of a organization. of our collaborative and ongoing ethnography term Discontinued meds were deleted from EHR without verification from prescriber/pharmacy from (10%) verification EHR without from deleted meds were Discontinued wide strategy called “Dynamic Design Planning” through which insights from our ethnography are are our ethnography from which insights through “Dynamic Planning” Design called ­wide strategy making that help us “take the pulse” of our collaboration and reshape our team science as needed. We are are We as needed. science our team and reshape of our collaboration “take the pulse” making help us that Re-design MR workflow to optimize interdisciplinary roles in a community-health team model (PC teams + Re-design (PC team model community-health roles in a interdisciplinary to optimize MR workflow home health services). social agencies, community pharmacists, of MR workflow. coordination improve dynamics to Conduct further on team research Expand “team members” to integrate community pharmacists/other prescribers to improve medication medication improve community to pharmacists/other prescribers integrate to members” “team Expand efficiency. quality/safetyworkflow and use of open-ended collection the MR data questions in improve to programs training Implement team process. Problem with MR documentation system or insufficient time for completion (31%). for time or insufficient system with MR documentation Problem of visit (10%). phase intake after patient MR completed >10 medications list contains medication patients’ when the assistant one medical by MR not completed multiple providers/specialists. sees or if the patient • 4. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. 1. Poster 21 Poster of “integrated transmedia storymaking,” or the synergistic and dynamic use of multiple media to tell a range of a range tell media to and dynamic use of multiple or the synergistic storymaking,” transmedia “integrated of and to cultivate team our allows blogging collaborative finding that are we a single online platform, across stories useful. readily and is both robust that science to practice a commitment decision­ cultivate to space a digital provides blog that a public team developing by this ethnography expanding currently of meaning forms and diverse both shared larger team larger sharing and of information forms with other emergent and integrated our team, to provided tracked, rapidly have encountered these tensions through the communication research we conduct with our interdisciplinary we research the communication through these tensions encountered have on draws that communication model of team an ecological share we In presentation, this poster collaborators. a long­ from insights matters such as group leadership, identity, and purpose. As members of the tri members of the ­ As and purpose. identity, leadership, such as group matters to supporttools scientific we public decision makingConsortium relevant seeking about dams, provide to making their science accessible and applicable to stakeholders, they increasingly seek ways to develop timely and develop to seek ways they increasingly stakeholders, and applicable to making accessible their science and makingfor sharing collective information decisions about practical such as data concerns strategies flexible around difference of organizational tensions needs also reveal These and stakeholder engagement. integration Sustainability science aims to provide solutions to pressing and complex socio­ and complex pressing solutions to provide Sustainability to aims science and knowledge integration of collaboration levels conducting must practice unprecedented teams this science objectives with the goal of key research balance to strive teams these diverse As of disciplines. a range across Authors: Tyler Quiring, Bridie McGreavy, University of Maine University Bridie McGreavy, Quiring, Tyler Authors: Sustaining team science: Dynamic Design Planning as a collaborative ecology ecology Dynamic science: as a collaborative Planning Sustaining team Design SciTS 2017 Conference: SciTS 2017 Conference: Opportunities for Improved Team Communication and Coordination and Coordination Communication Team Opportunities Improved for Workflow deviations Workflow