The British Empire and the Early Cold War: a Comparison of Hong Kong and Cyprus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The British Empire and the Early Cold War: a Comparison of Hong Kong and Cyprus View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository THE BRITISH EMPIRE AND THE EARLY COLD WAR: A COMPARISON OF HONG KONG AND CYPRUS Christopher James Sutton Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of East Anglia School of History August 2014 This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Abstract This thesis seeks to re‐define the Cold War as first and foremost a conflict of imperialisms and to identify how it was fought on the ground. It does so by identifying and comparing British policies in two geostrategic colonies, Hong Kong (1938‐1952) and Cyprus (1941‐1955), where there operated two of what policy‐ makers considered to be the British Empire’s most critical communist threats: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Progressive Party of Working People (AKEL). The thesis examines the motivations and actions of British colonial policy‐ makers, as they attempted to recover Britain’s great power status and imperial prestige, against the challenges of international anti‐colonialism, colonial nationalisms, and, above all, the seemingly coordinated efforts of colonial, national, and transnational communist movements to undermine the British Empire. This British revisionist study argues that British imperialism (as well as that of the Soviet Union) started, defined the nature of, and was transformed in response to the Cold War. ii Contents Abstract .........................................................................................................................ii List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... iv Biographical Notes ........................................................................................................ v Acknowledgements .................................................................................................... xiii Introduction Introduction: Historiographies, Framework, and Sources ........................................... 2 Section One: From Enemy to Ally to Enemy Chapter One: A History of Anglo‐Soviet Imperial Tensions .............................................................. 36 Chapter Two: ‘A World of Grey Men’: The Rise of the CCP, 1938‐1946 .......................................... 55 Chapter Three: Moderate, Irreproachable, and Organized: The Rise of AKEL, 1941‐1946 ................ 74 Chapter Four: British Anti‐Communism: From Enemy to Ally to Enemy ........................................ 103 Section Two: Containment through Reform Chapter Five: The Breakdown of Allied Cooperation and the Resumption of the Cold War......... 108 Chapter Six: A Failed New Deal in Hong Kong: From Constitution to Repression, 1946‐1949 .... 126 Chapter Seven: A Failed New Deal in Cyprus: From Constitution to Repression, 1946‐1949 .......... 170 Chapter Eight: British Anti‐Communism: Containment through Reform ........................................ 206 Section Three: Containment through Repression Chapter Nine: The Decline of the British World System ................................................................. 210 Chapter Ten: The Fall of China and ‘Pax’ Americana, 1949‐1952 ................................................. 224 Chapter Eleven: ‘Too Much or Too Little Repression’: The Fall of AKEL, 1949‐1955 ......................... 259 Chapter Twelve: British Anti‐Communism: Containment through Repression .................................. 289 Conclusion Conclusion: Britain, the Empire, and the Cold War ................................................. 293 Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 312 iii List of Abbreviations ACJ Arthur Creech Jones [papers] AKEL Progressive Party of Working People AON Progressive Organization of Youth CCP Chinese Communist Party Cominform Information Bureau of the Communist and Workers’ Parties Comintern Communist International COS chiefs of staff DSE Democratic Army of Greece DSO defence security officer EAK Union of Cypriot Farmers EAM National Liberation Front EAS National Liberation Alliance ELAS Greek People’s Liberation Army ELES Limassol Committee for National Cooperation EOKA National Organization of Cypriot Fighters FTU Federation of Trade Unions [of Hong Kong] IRD Information Research Department IUS International Union of Students JIC(FE) Joint Intelligence Committee (Far East) KEK Cypriot Nationalist Party KKE Communist Party of Greece KKK Communist Party of Cyprus KMT Kuomintang [Nationalist Party of China] MBE Member of the British Empire MCP Malayan Communist Party MM Malcolm MacDonald [papers] MP member of Parliament NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NCNA New China News Agency OAG officer administering the government PDK Provisional Democratic Government [of Greece] PEK Pancyprian Farmers’ Union PEO Pancyprian Federation of Labour PEON Pancyprian National Youth Organization PESP Pancyprian Greek Socialist Vanguard PODY Pancypriot Organization of Democratic Women PRC People’s Republic of China PSE Pancyprian Trades Union Committee PSR political situation report ROC Republic of China SEK Confederation of Cyprus’s Workers SIFE Security Intelligence Far East SIME Security Intelligence Middle East TNA The National Archives [of the United Kingdom] TUC Trades Union Congress VOKS All‐Union Society for Cultural Relations with Foreign Countries WFDY World Federation of Democratic Youth WFTU World Federation of Trade Unions WIDF Women’s International Democratic Federation iv Biographical Notes ALEXANDER, 1st Viscount of Hillsborough (Albert Victor ALEXANDER) (1885‐1965). MP (Labour and Co‐operative), 1922‐1931, 1935‐1950. First lord of the Admiralty, 1940‐1945, 1945‐1946. Member, Cabinet mission to India, 1946. Minister of defence, 1946‐1950. ARMITAGE, Sir Robert Perceval (1906‐1990). New College, Oxford. Entered colonial administrative service, Kenya, 1930. Governor, Cyprus, 1954‐1955. Governor, Nyasaland, 1955‐1961. ATTLEE, Clement Richard (1883‐1967). University College, Oxford. MP (Labour), 1922‐1955. Parliamentary under‐secretary of state for war, 1924. Secretary of state for Dominion affairs, 1942‐1943. Deputy prime minister, 1942‐1945. Prime minister, 1945‐1951. Leader, Labour Party, 1935‐1955. BARTON, Cecil James Juxon Talbot (1891‐1980). Downing College, Cambridge. Entered colonial service, Kenya, c. 1914. Assistant district commissioner, Machakos, Kenya, 1914. Acting district commissioner, Turkana, Kenya, 1919. Colonial secretary, Fiji, 1936‐1941. Colonial secretary, Nyasaland, 1941‐1945. Principal, Colonial Office, 1945‐1958. BENNETT, John Sloman (1914‐1990). Magdalene College, Cambridge. Entered Colonial Office, 1936. Seconded, minister of state in the Middle East, 1941‐1945. Assistant secretary, Colonial Office, head of International Relations Department, 1946‐1947; Mediterranean Department, 1947‐1952. Seconded, Imperial Defence College, 1953. Assistant secretary, Colonial Office, head of General and Defence Department, 1953‐1956; West African B Department, 1957; Social Services B Department, 1958‐1962; Social Services Department, 1962‐1963; Economic, General, and Social Services Department, 1963‐1964; Gibraltar and South Atlantic Department (Commonwealth Relations Office/Foreign and Commonwealth Office), 1968‐1970. (Married Mary Letitia Somerville FISHER, 1955.) BEVIN, Ernest (1881‐1951). General secretary, Transport and General Workers Union, 1921‐1940. Member, General Council, TUC, 1925‐1940. President, TUC, 1937. MP (Labour), 1940‐1951. Minister of labour and national service, 1940‐ 1945. Secretary of state for foreign affairs, 1945‐1951. CHIANG Kai‐shek (1887‐1975). Commander‐in‐chief, KMT National Revolutionary Army, 1926‐1931. Director‐general, KMT, 1938‐1975. Chair, Supreme National Defence Council, ROC, 1939‐1975. President, ROC, 1948‐1949, 1950‐1975. President (prime minister), Executive Yuan, ROC, 1930‐1931, 1935‐1938, 1939‐ 1945, 1947. CHRISTODOULOU, Miltiades (1919‐2001). Member, AKEL, 1941‐1952. Municipal councillor, Nicosia, c. 1946‐1949. Founder and director, Cyprus News Agency, 1957‐1965. Director, Press and Information Office, Cyprus, 1965‐1981. v CHURCHILL, Sir Winston Leonard Spencer (1874‐1965). MP (Conservative), 1900‐ 1922, 1924‐1964. Parliamentary under‐secretary of state for the colonies, 1905‐ 1908. Home secretary, 1910‐1911. Secretary of state for war and air, 1919‐1921. Secretary of state for the colonies, 1921‐1922. Chancellor of the Exchequer, 1924‐1929. Minister of defence, 1940‐1945, 1951‐1952. Prime minister, 1940‐ 1945, 1951‐1955. Leader of the Conservative Party, 1940‐1955. CREECH JONES, Arthur (1891‐1964). National secretary, Transport and General Workers Union, 1919‐1929. MP (Labour), 1935‐1950, 1954‐1964. Parliamentary private secretary to the minister of Labour and National Service (Ernest BEVIN), 1940‐1945. Co‐founder and chair, Fabian Colonial Bureau, 1940‐1945. Member, Colonial Office Advisory Committee on Education in the Colonies, 1936‐1945. Chairman, Labour Party Advisory Committee on Labour Questions, 1944‐1945. Parliamentary under‐secretary of state for the colonies, 1945‐1946. Secretary of state for
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 501 25 November 2009 No. 5 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 25 November 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 513 25 NOVEMBER 2009 514 my hon. Friend the Member for North Ayrshire and House of Commons Arran (Ms Clark). In a letter I received from Ofcom, the regulator states: Wednesday 25 November 2009 “Ofcom does not have the power to mandate ISPs”— internet service providers. Surely that power is overdue, because otherwise, many of my constituents, along with The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock those of my colleagues, will continue to receive a poor broadband service. PRAYERS Mr. Murphy: My hon. Friend makes some very important points about the decision-making powers and architecture [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] that will ensure we achieve 90 per cent. broadband penetration. We are trying to ensure that the market provides most of that, and we expect that up to two thirds—60 to 70 per cent.—of homes will be able to Oral Answers to Questions access super-fast broadband through the market. However, the Government will have to do additional things, and my hon. Friend can make the case for giving Ofcom SCOTLAND additional powers; but, again, we are absolutely determined that no one be excluded for reasons of geography or income.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 America's Relations with Greece to 1945: from Aloof Soft Power to The
    1 AMERICA’S RELATIONS WITH GREECE TO 1945: FROM ALOOF SOFT POWER TO THE ONSET OF REGIONAL HARD POWER The Inaugural Demetrios and Demetra Partalis Kales Annual Lecture in Modern Greek History delivered at the Michigan League on November 12, 2009 by S. Victor Papacosma, Emeritus Professor of History and Director of the Lemnitzer Center for NATO and European Union Studies at Kent State University, Executive Director of the Modern Greek Studies Association The interest and involvement of the United States in Greek affairs began a slow trajectory from rather peripheral in the early nineteenth century to a level of increased concern by the end of World War II. But even by the beginning of 1945, as the following comments will try to point out, projections pointed to a limited regional presence for the United States, essentially a continuation of softer, relatively idealistic policy objectives. By early 1947, however, a dramatic reorientation would manifest itself, and not just for US relations with Greece. We must start at the beginning. George Washington in his 1796 Farewell Address had advised American abstention from European political and military entanglements. The level of American contact with the more distantly located, Ottoman-dominated Balkans developed even more slowly than that with other European regions during the nineteenth century. If any official American policy existed toward the problematic Eastern Question with its accompanying great power rivalries, it was that, in the issue of the Turkish Straits, freedom of the seas and therefore freedom of transit and navigation in the Straits should prevail both for naval and commercial vessels.1 The first Balkan people to attract the significant attention of America were the Greeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Hong Kong
    Modern Hong Kong Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History Modern Hong Kong Steve Tsang Subject: China, Hong Kong, Macao, and/or Taiwan Online Publication Date: Feb 2017 DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.280 Abstract and Keywords Hong Kong entered its modern era when it became a British overseas territory in 1841. In its early years as a Crown Colony, it suffered from corruption and racial segregation but grew rapidly as a free port that supported trade with China. It took about two decades before Hong Kong established a genuinely independent judiciary and introduced the Cadet Scheme to select and train senior officials, which dramatically improved the quality of governance. Until the Pacific War (1941–1945), the colonial government focused its attention and resources on the small expatriate community and largely left the overwhelming majority of the population, the Chinese community, to manage themselves, through voluntary organizations such as the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals. The 1940s was a watershed decade in Hong Kong’s history. The fall of Hong Kong and other European colonies to the Japanese at the start of the Pacific War shattered the myth of the superiority of white men and the invincibility of the British Empire. When the war ended the British realized that they could not restore the status quo ante. They thus put an end to racial segregation, removed the glass ceiling that prevented a Chinese person from becoming a Cadet or Administrative Officer or rising to become the Senior Member of the Legislative or the Executive Council, and looked into the possibility of introducing municipal self-government.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire and English Nationalismn
    Nations and Nationalism 12 (1), 2006, 1–13. r ASEN 2006 Empire and English nationalismn KRISHAN KUMAR Department of Sociology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA Empire and nation: foes or friends? It is more than pious tribute to the great scholar whom we commemorate today that makes me begin with Ernest Gellner. For Gellner’s influential thinking on nationalism, and specifically of its modernity, is central to the question I wish to consider, the relation between nation and empire, and between imperial and national identity. For Gellner, as for many other commentators, nation and empire were and are antithetical. The great empires of the past belonged to the species of the ‘agro-literate’ society, whose central fact is that ‘almost everything in it militates against the definition of political units in terms of cultural bound- aries’ (Gellner 1983: 11; see also Gellner 1998: 14–24). Power and culture go their separate ways. The political form of empire encloses a vastly differ- entiated and internally hierarchical society in which the cosmopolitan culture of the rulers differs sharply from the myriad local cultures of the subordinate strata. Modern empires, such as the Soviet empire, continue this pattern of disjuncture between the dominant culture of the elites and the national or ethnic cultures of the constituent parts. Nationalism, argues Gellner, closes the gap. It insists that the only legitimate political unit is one in which rulers and ruled share the same culture. Its ideal is one state, one culture. Or, to put it another way, its ideal is the national or the ‘nation-state’, since it conceives of the nation essentially in terms of a shared culture linking all members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989
    FORUM The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989 ✣ Commentaries by Michael Kraus, Anna M. Cienciala, Margaret K. Gnoinska, Douglas Selvage, Molly Pucci, Erik Kulavig, Constantine Pleshakov, and A. Ross Johnson Reply by Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana, eds. Imposing, Maintaining, and Tearing Open the Iron Curtain: The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2014. 563 pp. $133.00 hardcover, $54.99 softcover, $54.99 e-book. EDITOR’S NOTE: In late 2013 the publisher Lexington Books, a division of Rowman & Littlefield, put out the book Imposing, Maintaining, and Tearing Open the Iron Curtain: The Cold War and East-Central Europe, 1945–1989, edited by Mark Kramer and V´ıt Smetana. The book consists of twenty-four essays by leading scholars who survey the Cold War in East-Central Europe from beginning to end. East-Central Europe was where the Cold War began in the mid-1940s, and it was also where the Cold War ended in 1989–1990. Hence, even though research on the Cold War and its effects in other parts of the world—East Asia, South Asia, Latin America, Africa—has been extremely interesting and valuable, a better understanding of events in Europe is essential to understand why the Cold War began, why it lasted so long, and how it came to an end. A good deal of high-quality scholarship on the Cold War in East-Central Europe has existed for many years, and the literature on this topic has bur- geoned in the post-Cold War period.
    [Show full text]
  • Sino-British Agreement and Nationality: Hong Kong's Future in the Hands of the People's Republic of China
    UCLA UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal Title The Sino-British Agreement and Nationality: Hong Kong's Future in the Hands of the People's Republic of China Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9j3546s0 Journal UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, 8(1) Author Chua, Christine Publication Date 1990 DOI 10.5070/P881021965 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE SINO-BRITISH AGREEMENT AND NATIONALITY: HONG KONG'S FUTURE IN THE HANDS OF THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA Christine Chua* I. INTRODUCTION On July 1, 1997, the United Kingdom will officially relinquish its sovereignty over Hong Kong' to the People's Republic of China (PRC). The terms for the transfer of governmental control are set forth in the Joint Declaration of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Govern- ment of the People's Republic of China on the Question of Hong Kong (hereinafter, "Joint Declaration"), which was signed by rep- resentatives for both governments on December 19, 1984. The terms likewise appear in the Memoranda exchanged by the United 2 Kingdom and PRC governments on the signing date. Set forth in the Joint Declaration is the PRC's intent to estab- lish the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR). 3 Rules for implementing the separate government of the Hong Kong SAR are also enumerated. 4 The creation of the Hong Kong SAR is au- thorized by a provision in the PRC Constitution' originally in- * J.D., 1989, UCLA School of Law; B.A., 1985, Cornell University.
    [Show full text]
  • In Hong Kong the Political Economy of the Asia Pacific
    The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez- Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific Series editor Vinod K. Aggarwal More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/7840 Fujio Mizuoka Contrived Laissez-Faireism The Politico-Economic Structure of British Colonialism in Hong Kong Fujio Mizuoka Professor Emeritus Hitotsubashi University Kunitachi, Tokyo, Japan ISSN 1866-6507 ISSN 1866-6515 (electronic) The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ISBN 978-3-319-69792-5 ISBN 978-3-319-69793-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69793-2 Library of Congress Control Number: 2017956132 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Inevitability and Contingency: the Political Economy of Brexit1 Placing
    Inevitability and contingency: the political economy of Brexit1 Placing Britain’s vote on 23 June 2016 to leave the European Union in historical time raises an immediate analytical problem. What was clearly the result of a number of contingencies, starting with the 2015 general election where we can see how events could readily have turned out otherwise and was a shock to the British government that had not prepared for this outcome might also represent the inevitable end of Britain’s membership of the EU seen from the distant future. This paper seeks to take both temporal perspectives seriously. It aims to provide an explanation of the vote for Brexit that recognises the referendum result as politically contingent and also argue that the political economy of Britain generated by Britain’s position as non-euro member of the EU whilst possessing the offshore financial centre of the euro zone and Britain’s eschewal in 2004 of transition arrangements on freedom of movement for A8 accession states made Brexit an eventual inevitability, saving a prior collapse of the euro zone. Keywords: Brexit, European Union, Cameron, the euro, freedom of movement Britain’s vote on 23 June 2016 to leave the European Union (EU) presents a temporal paradox. Seen from the distant future, Brexit is likely to appear the inevitable outcome of the long history of Britain’s membership of the EU and its predecessors. Britain joined a partial economic union whose rules had been determined by others, when that union became a currency union it was unwilling to sacrifice monetary sovereignty and opted-out, and when that currency union produced an economic crisis that both required more political union and had spill-over effects for Britain, membership was rendered unsustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Geopolitics and Film Censorship in Cold War Hong Kong (Book Review)
    Conflict, Justice, Decolonization: Critical Studies of Inter-Asian Society (2019) 2709-5479 Hong Kong in the Cultural Cold War and the Colonial Southeast Asia: Review of Geopolitics and Film Censorship in Cold War Hong Kong (Book Review) Ip Po-Yee Institute of Social Research and Cultural Studies National Chiao Tung University This article is a review of Zardas Shuk-man Lee’s recently published book Geopolitics and Film Censorship in Cold War Hong Kong (2019), an extensive historical research regarding the institution of film censorship in Hong Kong during the 1940s-1970s. From the perspective of film censorship studies, Lee’s ambitious work questions the Cold War geopolitics and further contributes to cultural Cold War studies, Hong Kong colonial studies and Sinophone studies. Keywords: Cold War, Hong Kong, Sinophone, Colonial studies, Film censorship Over the past two decades, Cold War studies have been faced with a cultural turn. In lieu of the emphasis on political economy or diplomacy of the superpowers, researchers have begun to underscore the localized dimension of state propaganda and cultural production as well. Hong Kong has been commonly regarded as “Berlin of the East” during the Cold War era, an ideological battlefield highly contested by the Chinese Communist Party and the Taiwan Kuomintang – namely “the Left” and “the Right”. While extensive research regarding Hong Kong media and film production has been conducted, rarely has scholarly literature investigated Hong Kong film censorship. As one of the pioneering published research projects, historian Zardas Shuk-man Lee’s new book – translated from her previous thesis – Geopolitics and Film Censorship in Cold War Hong Kong( ​ ​ Chinese title:《冷戰光影:地緣政治下的香港電影審查史》) offers crucial insights about film censorship studies, the cultural Cold War, Hong Kong colonial studies and Sinophone studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mber - Order of the British Empire (Mbe)
    MEMBER - ORDER OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE (MBE) MBE 2021 UPDATED: 26 June 2021 To CG: 26 June 2021 PAGES: 99 ========================================================================= Prepared by: Surgeon Captain John Blatherwick, CM, CStJ, OBC, CD, MD, FRCP(C), LLD(Hon) Governor General’s Foot Guards Royal Canadian Air Force / 107 University Squadron / 418 Squadron Royal Canadian Army Medical Corps HMCS Discovery / HMCS York / HMCS Protecteur 12 (Vancouver) Field Ambulance 1 MBE (military) awarded to CANADIAN ARMY WW1 (MBE) CG DATE NAME RANK UNIT DECORATIONS / 09/02/18 AUGER, Albert Raymond Captain Cdn Forestry Corps MBE 12/07/19 BAGOT, Christopher S. Major Cdn Forestry Corps (OBE) MBE 09/02/18 BENTLEY, William Joseph LCol Asst Director Dental Svc MBE 20/07/18 BLACK, Gordon Boyes Major Cdn Forestry Corps MBE 20/07/18 BROWN, George Thomas Lieutenant Cdn Army Medical Corps MBE 12/07/19 CAINE, Martin Surney Lieutenant Alberta Regiment MBE 20/07/18 CALDWELL, Bruce McGregor Major OIC Cdn Postal Corps MBE 09/02/18 CAMPBELL, David Bishop LCol Cdn Forestry Corps MBE 05/07/19 CARLESS, William Edward Lieutenant Canadian Engineers MBE 05/07/19 CASSELS, Hamilton A/Captain Attached RAF MBE 12/07/19 CASTLE, Ivor Captain General List MBE 09/02/18 CHARLTON, Charles Joseph Captain Staff Captain Cdn HQ MBE 12/07/19 CLARKE, Thomas Walter A/Captain Cdn Railway Troops MBE 05/07/19 COLES, Harry Victor Lieutenant Cdn Machine Gun Corps MBE 20/07/18 COLLEY, Thomas Bellasyse Captain Phys & Bayonet Training MBE 09/02/18 COOPER, Herbert Millburn Lieutenant Asst Inspect Munitions MBE 12/07/19 COX, Alexander Lieutenant Saskatchewan Reg MBE 05/07/19 CRAIG, Alexander Meldrum S/Sgt Maj Cdn Army Service Corps MBE 14/12/18 CRAFT, Samuel Louis Captain Quebec Regiment MBE 10/05/19 CRIPPS, George Wilfitt Lieutenant 13 Bn Cdn Railway Troop MBE 12/07/19 CURRIE, Thomas Dickson A/Captain Cdn Railway Troops MBE 12/09/19 CURRY, Charles Townley Hon Lt General List MBE 05/07/19 DEAN, George Edward Lieutenant CFA attched RAF MBE 05/07/19 DRIVER, George Osborne H.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 10-Final Cover
    COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN Issue 10 Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, D.C. March 1998 Leadership Transition in a Fractured Bloc Featuring: CPSU Plenums; Post-Stalin Succession Struggle and the Crisis in East Germany; Stalin and the Soviet- Yugoslav Split; Deng Xiaoping and Sino-Soviet Relations; The End of the Cold War: A Preview COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN 10 The Cold War International History Project EDITOR: DAVID WOLFF CO-EDITOR: CHRISTIAN F. OSTERMANN ADVISING EDITOR: JAMES G. HERSHBERG ASSISTANT EDITOR: CHRISTA SHEEHAN MATTHEW RESEARCH ASSISTANT: ANDREW GRAUER Special thanks to: Benjamin Aldrich-Moodie, Tom Blanton, Monika Borbely, David Bortnik, Malcolm Byrne, Nedialka Douptcheva, Johanna Felcser, Drew Gilbert, Christiaan Hetzner, Kevin Krogman, John Martinez, Daniel Rozas, Natasha Shur, Aleksandra Szczepanowska, Robert Wampler, Vladislav Zubok. The Cold War International History Project was established at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C., in 1991 with the help of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and receives major support from the MacArthur Foundation and the Smith Richardson Foundation. The Project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to disseminate new information and perspectives on Cold War history emerging from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side”—the former Communist bloc—through publications, fellowships, and scholarly meetings and conferences. Within the Wilson Center, CWIHP is under the Division of International Studies, headed by Dr. Robert S. Litwak. The Director of the Cold War International History Project is Dr. David Wolff, and the incoming Acting Director is Christian F.
    [Show full text]
  • CF-130--Chapter 13
    166 13. On the Future of the “Post-Soviet Region” Dmitrii E. Furman* Contradictory trends and events appearing after the sudden collapse of the Soviet Union five years ago present analysts with a weighty challenge in attempting to anticipate the political future of the former Soviet region. Will the new states solidify their independent status, or will they tend towards convergence, cooperation, and even reunification? The decision of Russia’s State Duma to denounce the Belovezhsky Agreements and make new agreements on the “extended integration” of Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Belarus strongly contrasts with the Russian president’s assignment of nearly independent status to Chechnya.1 These apparently contradictory actions demonstrate the indefinite political borders and instability of the post-Soviet region. Neither in Russia, nor in the other countries of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), is there yet a sense of “naturalness” or stability in the present political situation. In almost every republic, separatist movements, and some self-proclaimed (i.e., “illegal”) states have emerged. Meanwhile, all manner of integrationist ideas and initiatives are proposed simultaneously. It could take decades for the region to assume a stable form, and there is no guarantee that by then all of the present states will still exist. In 1989–1991, anti-Soviet feelings were on the rise. Politicians, publicists, and scholars strove to harness these feelings and express them in compelling terms. At that time, while various “anti-imperial” thoughts and phrases filled newspapers and magazines, nobody was concerned with consistency or logic. The idea of sovereignty for the republics was presented side by side with the idea of ethnic minorities’ rights to independence from Russia.
    [Show full text]